臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：對外直接投資之不對稱訊息、最適進入決策與研究發展
作者：蔡宜臻
作者(外文)：Yi-jen Tsai
校院名稱：國立中央大學
系所名稱：產業經濟研究所
指導教授：邱俊榮
陳忠榮
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2008
主題關鍵詞：研究發展；進入決策；不對稱訊息；對外直接投資；R&D；entry mode；uncertainty；FDI
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
過去有許多文章討論與對外直接投資相關的議題，本論文則是針對並剖析對外直接投資與訊息不對稱、市場進入模式和研究發展的關聯性，藉以彰顯對外直接投資在各個議題中的重要性。上述三個議題，本論文是由三篇相互獨立的文章所組成分別為本文的第二章至第四章。接下來，我們將這三個不同議題所探討的主要內容分別簡述如下。第2章不對稱訊息與最適外人直接投資課稅政策：本章認為跨國廠商的對外直接投資，就地主國政府而言，吸引跨國廠商前來直接投資有許多可能的好處，最主要不外是希望獲取跨國廠商的技術，或是藉以創造就業機會。而地主國政府對外人直接投資課稅政策的制定，將同時影響兩國的廠商與政府。但是事實上，地主國政府對於跨國廠商的成本高低經常不具完全訊息，導致地主國政府可能使用錯誤的課稅政策，進而影響地主國的福利水準。故地主國政府，應如何在跨國廠商的成本為私訊息時，選擇一適當的課稅政策以兼顧稅收與就業，來追求福利的極大，是本章想討論的主要議題。第3章跨國廠商進入市場模式選擇：當跨國廠商考慮進入地主國市場時，通常面臨該以何種方式進入地主國市場的問題。對跨國廠商而言，在各種不同進入模式下有不同的優點與限制，並對兩廠商未來的關係與發展有相當程度的影響。因此，跨國廠商應如何選擇一個對其最合適且有利的市場進入模式進入地主國市場，這將是本章想探討的議題。第4章對外直接投資與研究發展：若是投資地主國較低廉的工資水準而吸引了跨國廠商的直接投資，在這樣的情況下，跨國廠商的直接投資究竟會不會影響其技術提升的誘因，因為在這樣的趨勢下，產業空洞化、失業問題等對經濟所造成的影響將不容忽視，正是本章想欲探討的議題。
This paper is about FDI. And it is to compose with three papers. One is about of uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to examine when foreign firm has cost uncertainty then host government should make separating or pooling tax policy. Then the two of this paper is to examine when foreign firms want to entry host country what is the best entry mode. And foreign firms entry mode can FDI、export or licensing. The last of this paper is purpose of this paper is to examine whether a lower labor cost in the host country will negatively affect a multinational firm’s R&D investment. An imperfectly competitive market structure and a production function with labor and technology inputs are utilized in this paper. The main findings in this paper are as follows. (1) If labor and technology were complementary inputs, the multinational firm will increase its R&D investment as it invests outward. (2) If labor and technology were substitute inputs, the impact of outward direct investment on multinational firm’s R&D investment is ambiguous. It is shown that the lower the host country’s wage or the larger the market size, it is more likely that the multinational firm’s R&D investment will decrease due to outward direct investment. (3) In the case that a host country’s firm also invests in R&D, its R&D investment will decrease while facing a foreign direct investment as labor and technology are complementary. On the contrary, as labor and technology are substitute, the host firm’s R&D investment may increase while facing a foreign direct investment.
第1章

劉孟俊（2006），「國外投資事業營運狀況調查分析報告」，經濟部投資審議委員會。
The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), World Investment Report 2007, United Nations.


第2章　

Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1984), “Trade Warfare: Tariffs and Cartels,” Journal of International Economics, 16, 227-242.
Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer (1987), “Foreign Direct Investment with Unemployment and Endogenous Taxes and Tariffs,” Journal of International Economics, 22, 257-279.
Brainard, S. L. and D. Martimort (1997), “Strategic Trade Policy with Incompletely Informed Policymakers,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 33-65.
Elberfeld, W., G. Georg and F. Stähler (2005), “Vertical Foreign Direct Investment, Welfare, and Employment,” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 5, 1280-1308.
Goldstein, I. and A. Razin (2006), “An Information-Based Trade off between Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 70, 271-295.
Lahiri, S. and Y. Ono (1998), “Foreign Direct Investment, Local Content Requirement, and Profit Taxation,” Economic Journal, 108, 444-457.
Lahiri, S. and Y. Ono (2003), “Export-Oriented Foreign Direct Investment and Local Content Requirement,” Pacific Economic Review, 8, 1-14.
Qiu, L. D. (1994), “Optimal Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information,” Journal of International Economics, 36, 333-354.
Qiu, L. D. and Z. Tao (2001), “Export, Foreign Direct Investment, and Local Content Requirement,” Journal of Development Economics, 66, 101-125.
Rafael, M., O. Vicente and S. M. Jose (2007), “Asymmetric Demand Information and Foreign Direct Investment,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 109, 93-106.
Razin, A. and E. Sadka (2006), “Corporate Transparency, Cream-Skimming and FDI,” European Economic Review, 51, 1263-1276.
Tigran, M. and L. Harvey (2005), “Tariffs, Quotas, and Forward Contracts under Asymmetric Information,” Review of International Economics, 13, 311-329.
Wong, K. (1990), “Incentive Incompatible, Immiserizing Export Subsidies,” University of Washington Discussion Paper 9020.
Xenia, M. (2003), “Tariff and Quota Equivalence in the Presence of Asymmetric Information,” Journal of International Economics, 61, 209-223.

第3章　

Belderbos, R. and L. Sleuwaegen (1998), “Tariff Jumping FDI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronic Firms in Europe,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 601-638.
Eicher, T. and J. W. Kang (2005), “Trade, Foreign Direct Investment or Acquisition: Optimal Entry Modes for Multinationals,” Journal of Development Economics, 77, 207-228.
Ethier, W. J. (1986), “The Multinational Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 805-833.
Fosfuri, A., M. Motta and T. Rønde (2001), “Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers through Workers’ Mobility,” Journal of Development Economics, 53, 205-222.
Fosfuri, A. (2000), “Patent Protection, Imitation and The Mode of Technology Transfer,”International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 1129-1149.
Horstmann, I. and J. R. Markusen (1987), “Strategic Investment and the Development of Multinationals,” International Economic Review, 28, 109-121.
Horstmann, I. and J. R. Markusen (1992), “Endogenous Market Structures in International Trade,” Journal of International Economics, 10, 361-368.
Harris, R. and N. Schmitt (2000), “Strategic Export Policy with Foreign Direct Investment and Import Substitution,” Journal of Development Economics, 62, 85-104.
Jocelyn, G.. A. and K. Saggi (2002), “Licensing versus Direct Investment: Implications for Economic Growth,” Journal of International Economics, 56, 131-153.
Kabiraj, T. and S. Marjit (2003), “Protecting Consumers through Protection: The Role of Tariff-Induced Technology Transfer,” European Economic Review, 47, 113-124.
Konishi, H., K. Saggi and S. Weber (1999), “Endogenous Trade Policy under Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 289-308.
Motta, M. (1992), “Multinational Firms and the Tariff-Jumping Argument,” European Economic Review, 36, 1557-1571.
Motta, M., J. F. Thisse and A. Cabrales (1997), “On the Persistence of Leadership and Leapfrogging in International Trade,” International Economic Review, 38, 809-824.
Murakami, Y. (2005), “Are Multinational Enterprises more Productive: A Test of The Selection Hypothesis,” Journal of Asian Economics, 16, 327-339.
Mukheriee, A. and P. Enrico (2006), “Tariffs, Licensing and Market Structure,” European Economic Review, 50, 1699-1707.
Qiu, L. D. and Z. Tao (2001), “Export, Foreign Direct Investment, and Local Content Requirement,” Journal of Development Economics, 66, 101-125.
Rowthorn, R. E. (1992), “Intra-Industry Trade and Investment under Oligopoly: The Role of Market size,” Economic Journal, 102, 402-414.
Rob, R. and N. Vettas (2003), “Foreign Direct Investment and Exports with Growing Demand,” Review of Economic Studies , 69, 1-20.
Smith, A. (1987), “Strategic Investment, Multinational Corporations and Trade Policy,” European Economic Review, 31, 89-96.
Saggi, K. (1996), “Entry into a Foreign Market: Foreign Direct Investment versus Licensing,” Review of International Economics, 4, 99-104.
Saggi, K. (1999), “Foreign Direct Investment, Licensing, and Incentives for Innovation,” Review of international Economics, 7, 699-714.
Song, E. Y. (1996), “Voluntary Export Restraints and Strategic Technology Transfer,” Journal of International Economics, 40, 165-186.
Sthäler, F. (2006), “Market Entry and Foreign Direct Investment,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24, 335-347.
Tang, M. J. and C. M. J. Yu (1990), “Foreign Market Entry: Production-Related Strategies,” Management Science, 36, 476-489.
Taylor, C.T. and Z. A. Silberston (1973), The Economic Impact of The Patent System: A Study of The British Experience, Cambridge University Press.
Teng, J. T., M. S. Chern and K. H. Kim (2001), “Entry Strategies for Multinational Enterprises and Host Countries,” European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 62-68.

第4章

王鶴松 (2003)，「加入WTO後兩岸經貿互動的利益與風險」，中國商銀月刊， 22， 1-10。
吳榮義 (2000)，「挽救傳統產業必須對症下藥」，台灣經濟研究院經濟評論。
徐世勳與吳秉叡 (2002)，「WTO架構下開放對大陸投資之經貿影響評估」，台灣經濟預測與政策，33，75-110。
陳建隆與徐芳霞 (2003)，「防禦型對外直接投資與內生化研發水準」，經濟論文叢刊，31，577-603。
潘治民與黃鴻 (1986)，「一階段與二階段方法求解均衡值之異同」，經濟論文叢刊，14，213-233。
蔡宏明 (2005)，「中國大陸高科技產業發展及台商赴大陸投資」，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，11，25-57。
Das, S. P. (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment and the Relative Wage in a Developing Economy,” Journal of Development Economics, 67, 55-77.
d’Aspremont, C. and A. Jacquemin (1988), “Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers,” American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1138.
de Bondt, R., L. Sleuwaegen, and R. Veugelers (1988), “Innovative Strategic Groups in Multinational Industries,” European Economic Review, 32, 905-925.
Glass, A. J. and K. Saggi (1999), “FDI Policies under Shared Factor Markets,” Journal of International Economics, 49, 309-332.
Grossman, G. M., E. Helpman and A. Szeidl (2006), “Optimal Integration Strategies for the Multinational Firm,” Journal of International Economics, 70, 216-238.
Harris, R. G. and N. Schmitt (2001), “Strategic Export Policy with Foreign Direct Investment and Import Substitution,” Journal of Development Economics, 64, 293-312.
Helpman, E., M. J. Melitz and S. R. Yeaple (2004), “Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms,” American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.
Kamien, M. I., Muller, E. and I. Zang (1992), “Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels,” American Economic Review, 82, 1293-1306.
Petit, M. L. and F. Sanna-Randaccio (1998), “Technological Innovation and Multinational Expansion: A Two-Way Link?”Journal of Economics, 68, 1-26.
Petit, M. L. and F. Sanna-Randaccio (2000), “Endogenous R&D and Foreign Direct Investment in International Oligopolies,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 339-367.
Skaksen, M. Y. and J. R. SØrensen (2001), “Should Trade Unions Appreciate Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 55, 379-390.
Veugelers, R. and P. Vanden Houte (1990), “Domestic R&D in the Presence of Multinational Enterprises,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8, 1-15.
Wang, J. Y. and M. Blomstrom (1992), “Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer,” European Economic Review, 36, 137-155.
Yeaple, S.R. (2003), “The Complex Integration Strategies of Multinationals and Cross Country Dependencies in the Structure of Foreign Direct Investment,” Journal of International Economics, 60, 293-314.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：868（臺灣：866，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67846397
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上