:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧資本的價值及國際化與審計品質對貸款利率的影響
作者:蔡學章
作者(外文):Hsuehchang Tsai
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:國際企業學系
指導教授:滑明曙
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:智慧資本會計盈餘價值關聯性國際化貸款利率負債比率審計品質Intellectual capitalEarningsValue relevanceInternationalizationLoan interest ratesDebt ratioAudit quality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:27
本博士論文旨在探討智慧資本的價值及國際化與審計品質對貸款利率的影響,包含三篇深具管理意涵的研究。這三篇研究之題目分別為「企業智慧資本的價值關聯性」、「企業國際化對貸款利率的影響」及「審計品質的價值:來自貸款利率訂價的證據」。
本論文第一篇研究之目的在於,探討企業智慧資本的價值關聯性。此篇研究之動機在於,近年來有不少研究顯示,企業股東權益的市場價值與帳面價值的差異正在逐年擴大,而且有些實證研究的結果指出,會計盈餘與帳面價值已逐漸喪失其對股價的解釋能力。此篇研究使用兩階段的超額盈餘折現值法,衡量兩個不同國家樣本企業的智慧資本,分析企業實質基本的價值與實質基本的市價淨值比,是否分別都能顯著的解釋其實際觀測的價值與實際觀測的市價淨值比,並檢驗企業智慧資本與帳面價值對股價的聯合解釋能力是否優於會計盈餘與帳面價值。此篇研究之實證結果證明,企業實質基本的價值與實質基本的市價淨值比,確實分別都能顯著的解釋其實際觀測的價值與實際觀測的市價淨值比。迴歸的實證結果亦顯示,企業智慧資本與帳面價值對股價的聯合解釋能力確實優於會計盈餘與帳面價值;而且,若將智慧資本這個變數納入會計基礎的評價模式中,將可顯著提高其對股價的解釋能力。這些研究結果的管理意涵在於,智慧資本已經成為知識經濟時代中企業價值的重要部分,且智慧資本確實比會計盈餘更能強而有力的解釋企業的股價。
本論文第二篇研究之目的在於,探討台灣中小企業之國際化程度對其貸款利率與負債融資比率的影響。此篇研究之動機在於,先前的研究對於企業國際化、負債比率及其負債融資成本的關係之實證結果並無一致的定論,且沒有論文著重在新興市場中的中小企業研究上。此篇研究使用台灣已上市櫃中小企業2001-2006年期間之1038個實際的貸款利率資料,進行多元迴歸分析,期能提供新興市場實證的證據。此篇研究之實證結果證明,國際化程度較高的企業確實支付較低的銀行貸款利率。此外,研究之實證結果亦顯示,企業之國際化程度與其負債比率之間存有顯著的負向關係,且跨國型中小企業的平均負債比率亦低於國內型的中小企業。這些研究結果的管理意涵在於,跨國型中小企業致力於拓展國際市場時,可享有比國內型中小企業更多國際營運與更多成長機會的利益,因而享有較低的貸款利率,但同時也須面對比國內型中小企業較高的負債代理成本,因而產生較低的負債比率。
本論文第三篇研究之目的在於,探討審計品質對中小企業貸款利率的影響。此篇研究之動機在於,先前雖有很多論文探討過審計簽證對企業貸款利率的影響,卻很少有實證的研究探討審計品質的高低是否會影響企業的貸款利率,尤其是著重在新興市場的中小企業研究上。此篇研究使用台灣已上市櫃中小企業2001-2006年期間之1038個實際的貸款利率資料,進行多變量迴歸分析,期能提供新興市場實證的證據。研究之實證結果顯示,僱用四(五)大會計師事務所的會計師審計的企業,確實比僱用非四(五)大會計師事務所的會計師審計的企業,享有較低的貸款利率,但僱用四(五)大會計師事務所的會計師審計簽證的中小企業,在貸款利率上所能享有的利益,會隨著企業信用評等的好壞而變動。此外,在使用686家中小企業信用評等配對的子樣本進行檢測時,我們亦發現僱用四(五)大會計師事務所的會計師審計的中小企業之貸款利率,比僱用非四(五)大會計師事務所的會計師審計的中小企業之貸款利率,平均而言低了0.087%,且其所節省的利息負擔確實超過其所多支付的審計費用,而能產生淨利益。這些研究結果的管理意涵在於,較高的審計品質確實能降低中小企業的銀行貸款利率,但是企業信用評等的好壞在審計品質對其貸款利率的影響上,卻扮演著非常重要的角色。信用評等愈佳者,其所能享有的利息利益愈多。
綜合上述三篇研究的實證結果與管理意涵可知,企業的智慧資本、國際化程度及審計品質確實與企業價值的提高或享受貸款利率的利益有很密切的關係。因此,一個企業應致力於智慧資本的創造與管理,以增進其企業價值的提升;投資者則應投資那些實質基本價值明顯高於實際觀測價值的股票,以獲取投資的利潤。此外,一個企業也應積極拓展國際市場,並強化其審計品質,以能獲得更多來自於銀行貸款較低利率的利益。
The objective of this doctoral dissertation is to investigate the value relevance of intellectual capital and the effects of internationalization and audit quality on loan interest rates. This dissertation consists of three studies that may provide managerial implications. These studies are entitled “The Value Relevance of Intellectual Capital”, “The Effects of Internationalization on Loan Interest Rates”, and “The Value of Audit Quality: Evidence from Loan Pricing”, respectively.
The first study of this dissertation aims to investigate the value relevance of intellectual capital (IC). This research is motivated by the increasing gap between the market value and book value of firm’s equity and the empirical results of several studies that the joint explanatory power of earnings and book value for stock prices has decreased over time. This study uses a “two-stage” discounted residual income (DRI) model to measure firm’s IC and test it on two different country samples (142 electronics companies in the US and 239 in Taiwan). The empirical results show that a firm’s IC-measured fundamental value and fundamental P/B ratio are highly correlated with its current observed value and observed P/B ratio, respectively. In regressions of stock prices, the joint explanatory power of IC and book value is superior to that of earnings and book value. Moreover, the empirical results also document that including IC in the Accounting-based valuation model will significantly increase the explanatory power of the model for stock prices. These empirical results imply that IC has been the major part of a firm’s value in the knowledge-based economy, and that IC can powerfully explain the firm’s stock price more than earnings.
The second study of this dissertation aims to reinvestigate the effects of firm internationalization on loan interest rates as well as the relationship between firm internationalization and debt ratios with a focus on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This research is motivated by the inconclusive results of empirical studies on the effects of firm internationalization on debt costs and the relationship between firm internationalization and debt ratios, as well as by the lack of such research that focuses on SMEs in emerging markets. Using a panel sample of 1,038 SME year observations in Taiwan from 2001 to 2006, our findings indicate that an SME with a higher degree of internationalization (DOI) does pay lower loan interest rates. Our findings also indicate that the SME’s debt ratio is inversely related to its DOI, and that the average debt ratio of multinational SMEs is lower than that of domestic SMEs. These results provide empirical evidence that a higher DOI leads to lower interest rates on bank loans to SMEs and results in a lower level of debt financing by the SMEs, implying that multinational SMEs aggressively expand into international markets may enjoy more benefits from diversification and more growth opportunities, while facing higher agency costs of debt than domestic SMEs.
The third study of this dissertation aims to investigate the effects of audit quality on loan interest rates for SMEs. This research is motivated by the inconclusive results of experimental studies on how loan officers both use and perceive audited financial statements and the limited amount of direct empirical research on the value of audit quality in relation to loan interest rates. This study uses a multivariate regression to investigate the effects of audit quality on loan interest rates for SMEs. In our full sample of 1,038 annual observations in Taiwan during the period 2001-2006, the empirical results indicate that Big 4 (5) audited SMEs actually pay lower interest rates than non-Big 4 (5) audited SMEs, and that the interest rate benefit of purchasing a Big 4 (5) audit decreases as a firm’s credit rating increases. These results imply that higher audit quality does reduce the interest rates on bank loans, and a firm’s credit rating is crucial in determining the effects of audit quality on the interest rates of bank loans. Using a credit rating-matched subsample of 686 SMEs, we find that the Big 4 (5) audited SMEs’ interest rates are, on average, 8.7 basis points lower than those of non-Big 4 (5) audited SMEs. Moreover, these interest savings can cover the entire premium of Big 4 (5) audit fees and result in net benefits.
From the empirical results and managerial implications of three studies that mentioned above, it is quite obvious that the intangible IC, firm internationalization and well audit quality may increase firm’s value. Therefore, a firm should strive to enhance the creation and management of IC to enlarge its value, and the investor should invest in a portfolio of stocks whose fundamental value is obviously higher than observed value in order to get profits. Furthermore, a firm should strive to expand into international markets and enhance its audit quality in order to obtain more benefits from the lower interest rates on bank loans.
Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2006. Earnings management, litigation
risk and asymmetric audit fee responses. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25(1): 85-98.
Asthana, S.and J. Krishnan. 2006. Factors associated with the early adoption of the SEC’s revised auditor fee disclosure rules. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 25(2): 41-51.
Asthana, S., J. Krishnan, and S. Kim. 2004. The effect of enron, andersen, and
Sarbanes-Oxley on the market audit service. Working paper, Temple University.
Aoun, D. and A. Heshmati. 2008. International Diversification, capital structure
and cost of capital: Evidence from ICT firms listed at NASDAQ. Applied
Financial Economics 18: 1021-1032.
Armstrong, V. and L. Riddick. 1998. Legal and economic effects on firm value created by differences in bankruptcy law among countries. Working Paper, Washington State
University.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and
earning. Quality Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(September):71-97.
Bamber, E. M. and R. A. Stratton. 1997. The information content of the
uncertainty– modified audit report: Evidence from bank loan officers. Accounting
Horizons 11(2): 1-11.
Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1998. Relative valuation roles
of equity book value and net income as a functional of financial health. Journal of
Accounting and Economics 25(1): 1-34.
Barth, M. E. and R. Kasznik. 1999. Share repurchase and intangible assets. Journal
of Accounting and Economics 28: 211-241.
Berger, A. N. and G. F. Udell. 1990. Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk.
Journal of Monetary Economics 25: 21-42.
Berger, A. N. and G. F. Udell. 1995. Line of credit and relationship lending in
small firm finance. Journal of Business 68: 351-81.
Becker, C., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K.P. Subramanyam. 1998. The
effect of audit quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting
Research 15: 1-24.
Blackwell, D. W. and D. B. Winters. 1997. Banking relationships and the effect of monitoring on loan pricing. Journal of Financial Research 20: 275-89.
Blackwell, D. W., T. R. Noland, and D. B. Winters. 1998. The value of auditor
assurance: Evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research 36:
57-70.
Botsan C.A; M.A. Plumlee, and X. Yuan. 2004. The role of information precision
in determining the cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies (Jun-Sep): 233-259.
Booth, R. 1998. The measurement of intellectual capital. Management Accounting
76(10): 26-28.
Bontis, N., W. C. C. Keow, and S. Richardson. 2000. Intellectual capital and
business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital
1(1):85-100.
Brown, S., K. Lo, and T. Lys. 1999. Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring
changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and
Economics 28(2): 83-115.
Burgman, T. 1996. An empirical examination of multinational capital structure,
Journal of International Business Studies 27: 553-570.
Canibano, L., M. Garcia-Ayuso, and P. Sanchez. 2000. Accounting for intangibles:
a literature review. Journal of Accounting Literature 19: 102-130.
Casterella, J. R., J. R. Francis, B. L. Lewis, and P. L. Walker. 2004. Auditor
industry specialization, client bargaining power, and audit pricing. Auditing: A
Journal of Practice & Theory 23: 123-140.
Capar, N. and M. Kotabe. 2003. The relationship between international diversification and performance in service firms. Journal of International Business Studies 34(4): 345-355.
Chaney, P. and K. Philipich. 2002. Shredded reputation: the cost of audit failure.
Journal of Accounting Research 40(4): 1221-1245.
Chauvin, K.W. and M. Hirschey. 1993. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the
market value of the firm. Financial Management 22: 128-140.
Chen, M. C., S. J. Cheng, and Y. Hwang. 2005. An empirical investigation of the
relationship between intellectual capital and a firm’s market value and financial
performance. Journal of Intellectual Capita 6(2): 159-176.
Chin C., P. Lee, H. Chi, and A. Anadarajan. 2006. Patent citation, R&D spillover,
and Tobin Q: Evidence from the Taiwan semiconductor industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 26(1):67-84.
Chkir, I. E., and J. C. Cosset. 2001. Diversification strategy and capital structure
of multinational corporations. Journal of Multinational Financial Management
11: 17-37.
Chung, H. and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and
abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78(4): 931-955.
Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance
of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and
Economics 24: 39-67.
Core J. E., W. R. Guay, and A. V. Buskirk. September. 2001. Market valuations in
the new economy: An investigation of what has changed. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations
and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 20(3): 297-322.
Czarnitzki, D. and K. Kraft. 2007. Are credit ratings valuable information?
Applied Financial Economics 17: 1061-1070.
Diamond, D. W. 1989. reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of
Political Economy 97: 828-62.
Doukas, J.and C. Pantzalis. 2003. Geogeaphic diversification and agency costs of debt of multinational firms. Journal of Corporate Finance 9, 59-52.
Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of IC: An introduction.
International Management Accounting Study 78(2): 32-36.
Easley, D. and M. O’Hara. 2004. Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance
4:1553-1583.
Edvinsson, L. and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital—Realizing Your
Company’s True Value by Finding Its Hidden Roots. Harper Collins Publishers,
Inc., New York.
El Shamy, and Kayed. 2005. The value relevance of earnings and book values in
equity valuation: an international perspective—The case of Kuwait. International
Journal of Commerce and Manaqement 15(1): 68-79.
Fan, J. P. H. and T. J. Wong. 2002. Do external auditors perform a corporate
governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Working Paper,
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Fatemi, A. M. 1988. The effect of international diversification on corporate
financing policy. Journal of Business Research 16: 17-30.
Feltham, G. and J. Oholson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for
operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2):
319-52.
Ferguson, A. and D. Stokes. 2002. Brand name audit pricing, industry
specialization and leadership premium post-Big and Big 6 mergers. Contemporary
Accounting Research 19(1): 77-110.
Francis, J. R. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices – A study of
The Australian market. Journal of Accounting & Economics 6(2): 133-151.
Francis, J. and K. Schipper. 1998. Have financial statements lost their relevance?
Working paper, University of Chicago.
Francis, J. R., E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors
in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
18(Fall): 17-34.
Francis, J. R., L. Ryan, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2005. The market pricing of
accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39:295-327.
Frankel, R. and C. M. C. Lee (1998). Accounting valuation, market expectation,
and Cross-sectional stock returns. Journal of Accounting & Economics 25(3):
283-319.
Frenkel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors’ fees
for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77:
71-105.
Geringer, J. M., S. Tallman, and D.M. Olsen. 2000. Product and international
diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management
Journal 21: 51-80.
Ghosh, A. and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality.
The Accounting Review 80(2): 585-612.
Goldfinger C. 1997. Understanding and measuring the intangible economy:
Current status and suggestions for future research. CIRET seminar, Helsinki.
Gramling, A. A. and D. N. Stone. 2001. Audit firm industry expertise: A review
and synthesis of the archival literature. Journal of Accounting Literature 20: 1-29.
Grant, R. M. 1987. Multinationality and performance among british
manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies 18(3):
79-87.
Gul, F. A., C. J. P. Chen, and J. S. L. Tsai. 2003. Discretionary accounting
accruals, managers’ incentives and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research
20(3): 441-464.
Hand, J. 1998. Does CEO human capital make a difference? Working paper,
University of North Carolina.
Hitt, M. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and H. Kim. 1997. International diversification:
effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms.
Academy of Management Journal 40(4): 767-798.
Hyytinen, A. and M. Pajarinen. 2005. Financing of technology-intensive small
business: Some evidence rrom the ICT industry. Information Economics and
Policy 17: 115-132.
Jensen, M. and W. Mecking. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,
agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(October):
305-360.
Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and
Takeover. American Economic Review 76: 323-329.
Johnson, D., K. Pany, and R. White. 1983. Audit reports and the loan decision:
Actions and perceptions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 3: 38-51.
Kaplan, R. S. and Norton D. P. 2004. Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible
Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Khurnan, I. K. and K. K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting
credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 auditors: Evidence from Anglo-American
countries. The Accounting Review 79(2): 473-496.
Kim, W. S. and E. O. Lyn. 1986. “Excess market value, the multinational
corporation and Tobin’s Q ratio: A note,” Journal of International Business
Studies 17: 119-125.
Lee, W. S. and C. C. Kwok. 1988. Domestic and international practice of deposit
insurance: A survey. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 10: 29-62.
Lee, C. M. C., J. Myers, and B. Swaminathan. 1999. What is the intrinsic value of
the Dow? Journal of Finance 54(5): 1693–1741.
Lev, B. 1999. Seeing is believing – a better approach to estimating knowledge
capital, CFO magazine, April 2000.
Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Brookings
institution press Washington, D.C.
Lev, B. 2003. Remarks on the measurement, valuation, and reporting of
intangible assets. FRBNY Economic policy Review. 2003(Sep): 17-22.
Lev, B. and P. Zarowin. 1999. The boundaries of financial reporting and how to
extend them. Journal of Accounting Research 37(2): 353-85.
Maddala, G. S. 2001. Introduction to Econometrics, 3rd Edition. John Willey &
Sons. Ltd.
Masoulas, Vasilis. 1998. “Organizational requirements definition for IC management”. International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 16, Nos. 1/2/3. p.126-143.
Mansi, S. A. and D. M. Reeb. 2002. Corporate international activity and debt
financing. Journal of International Business Studies 33: 129-147.
Mishra, S., K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 2005. Do investors’ perceptions
vary with types of nonaudit fees? Evidence from auditor ratification voting.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24(2): 9-25.
Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the
auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory
auditor rotation? The Accounting Review 78(3): 779-799.
Nair, R. D. and L. E. Ritenberg. 1987. Messages perceived from audit, review,
and compilation reports: Extension to more diverse groups. Auditing: A Journal of
Practice and Theory 7: 15-38.
Ohlson J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in security valuation.
Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 661-87.
Palmrose, Z-V. 1986. Audit fees and audit size: Further evidence. Journal of
Accounting Research 24(1): 97-110.
Penman, S. H. 2001. Financial Statement Analysis and Security Valuation.
McGRAW-Hill, International Edition.
Petersen, M., and R. Rajan. 1994. The benefits of lending relationships:
evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance 49: 3-37.
Pillsbury, C. M. 1985. Limited assurance engagements. Auditing: A Journal of
Practice and Theory 5: 463-79.
Pittman, J. A. and S. Fortin. 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for
newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 113-136.
Reckers, P. M. J. and K. Pany. 1979. Quarterly statement reliability and auditor
association. Journal of Accountancy (October): 97-100.
Reeb, D. M., C. C. Kwok, and H. Y. Baek. 1998. Systematic risk of the
multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 29: 263-279.
Reeb, D. M., S. A. Mansi, and J. M. Allee. 2001. Firm internationalization and the
cost of debt financing: evidence from von-provisional publicly traded debt.
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36: 395-414.
Reynolds, J. K., D. R. Deis, and J. R. Francis. 2004. Professional services fees and
auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1): 29-52.
Riahi-Belkaoui, Ahmed. 2003. Intellectual capital and firm performance of US
multinational firms: A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal
of Intellectual Capital 4(2): 215-226.
Roos, G.. R., L. E. Roos, and N. C. Dragonetti. 1998. Intellectual Capital:
Navigating in the New Business Landscape, New York University Press.
Roslender, R. 2000. Accounting for intellectual capital: A contemporary
management accounting perspective. Management Accounting 78(3): 34-37.
Seetharaman, A., F. A. Gul, and S. G. Lynn. 2002. Litigation risk and audit fees:
Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US market. Journal of Accounting &
Economics 33(1): 91-115.
Shapiro, A. 1978. Financial structure and the cost of capital in the multinational
corporation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 13: 211-266.
Simon, D. and J. R. Francis. 1988. The effects of auditor change on audit fees:
Test of price cutting and price recovery. The Accounting Review 63(2): 255-269.
Singh, M. and A. Nejadmalayeri. 2004. Internationalization, capital structure,
and cost of capital: Evidence from French corporations. Journal of
Multinational Financial Management 14:153-169.
Singh, M., W. N. Davidson III, and J. A. Suchard. 2003. Corporate
diversification strategies and capital structure, Quarterly Review of Economics
and Finance 43: 147-167.
Sinkey, J. 1998. Commercial Bank Financial Management in the Financial
Services Industry. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual capital: the new wealth of organizations. New
YORK: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Strawser, J. R. 1994. An investigation of the effect of accountant involvement
with forecasts on the decisions and perceptions of commercial lenders. Journal
of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 9: 553-60.
Sullivan, D. 1994. Measuring the degree of internationalization of a firm.
Journal of International Business Studies 25(2): 325-342.
Tallman, S. and J. Li. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product
diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management
Journal 39(1): 179-196.
Teoh, S. and T. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response
coefficient. The Accounting Review 68(April): 346-366.
Verdi, R. S. 2005. Information environment and the cost of equity capital. Working Paper. University of Pennsylvania.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE