英文部份
Anheim, R. (1971). Entropy and Art – an Essay on Disorder and Order. Los Angeles,: University of California Press.
Attneave, F. (1957a). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 221-227.
Attneave, F. (1957b). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 221-227.
Averill, J. R. (1994). In the eyes of the beholder. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions. (pp. 7-14). New York: Oxford University Press.
Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity. Journal of Personality, 67, 331-371.
Bar-Yam, Y. (1997). Dynamics of complex systems. Reading PA: Addison-Wesley.
Barron, F., & Welsh, G. S. (1952). Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality style: Its measurement by a figure preference test. . The Journal of Psychology & Marketing, 33, 199-203.
Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 274-290.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971a). Aesthetics and Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971b). Arousal-moderating Devices, Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971c). Information, Uncertainty, Redundancy, Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Meredith Corporation.
Berlyne, D. E. (1974). The new experimental Aesthetics, in Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Berlyne, D. E., & Borsa, D. M. (1968). Uncertainty and the orientation reaction. Perception and Psychophysic, 3, 77-79.
Berlyne, D. E., Craw, M. A., Salapatek, P. H., & Lewis, J. L. (1963). Novelty, complexity, incongruity, extrinsic motivation and the GSR. Journal of Experimental psychology, 66, 560-567.
Berlyne, D. E., & McDonnell, P. (1965). Effects of stimulus complexity and incongruity on duration of EEG desynchronization. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 18, 156-161.
Berlyne, D. E., & Peckham, S. (1966). The semantic differential and other measures of reaction to visual complexity. Canadian Journal of psychology, 20, 125-135.
Bernard, Y. (1972). Sex influence in aesthetic behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 663-666.
Birkhoff, G. D. (1932). Aesthetic Measure. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
Bucy, E. P., Lang, A., Potter, R. F., & Grabe, M. E. (1999). Formal features of cyberspace: Relationships between web page complexity and site traffic. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13), 1246-1256.
Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Munar, E., Nadal, M., & Burges, L. (2002). The "style scheme" grounds perception of paintings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 91-100.
Chatterjee, A. (2003). Prospects for a Cognitive Neuroscience of Visual Aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology of the Arts, 4, 55-60.
Chipman, S. F. (1977). Complexity and structure in visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 106, 269-301.
Chipman, S. F., & Mendelson, M. J. (1979). Influence of six types of visual structure on complexity judgments in children and adults. . Journal of Experimental Psychology & Marketing: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 365-378.
Clore, G. L. (1994). Why Emotions vary in intensity. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of emotion,fundanmental questions (pp. 386-393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Emotion in aesthetics:Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23, 177-188.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes Error : Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam Publishing Group.
Davidson, A. W., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2006). Environmental complexity: information for human-environment well -being. In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems (pp. 157-168): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, L., Wang, S., & Lindridge, A. (2007). Culture influences on emotional responses to on-line store atmospheric cues. Journal of Business Research, In Press, Corrected Proof(Volume 61, Issue 8, ), 806-812
Day, H. I. (1968). The important of symmetry and complexity in the evaluation of complexity, interest and pleasingness. Psychnomic Science, 10, 339-340.
Deng, L. (2006). Beyond usability: Affect in web browsing. Unpublished Dissertation, Texas A&M University, United States -- Texas.
Devereaux, M. (1997). The philosophical status of aesthetics. Speech at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Aesthetics, from http://www.aesthetics-online.org/ideas/devereaux.html
Dewey, J. (1980). Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dieberger, A., & Bolter, J. D. (1995). On the design of hyper "spaces. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 98.
Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: An environmental psychology approach. . Journal of Retailing, 58(34-57).
Dormann, C. (2006). Cultural Representations in Web Design: Differences in Emotions and Values Paper presented at the HCI 2005: People and Computers XIX - The Bigger Picture.
Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan. (1983). Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 4, 307-323.
Ekman, P. (1999). Basic Emotions. In D. a. M. Power (Ed.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Sussex, U.K: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical Testing of a Model of Online Store Atmospherics and Shopper Responses. Psychology & Marketing, 20(2), 139-150.
Eysenck, H. (1941). The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83-92.
Eysenck, H. J. (1942). The experimental study of the "good gestalt" -a new approach. Psychol. Review, 49, 344-364.
Eysenck, H. J. (1968). An experimental study of aesthetic preference for polygonal figures. The Journal of General Psychology, 79, 3-17.
Farrell, E., & Rogers, P. (1982). Is aesthetic response independent of age, sex, and IQ? Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16, 96-98.
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel,.
Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. . Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 77-89.
Feldman, J. (1997). Regularity-based perceptual grouping. . Computational Intelligence, 13(4), 582-623.
Fossum, T. A. (2000). Distinguishing Evaluation from Description in the Personality-Emotion Relationship Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 669-678.
Francès, R. (1976). Comparative effects of six collative variables on interest and preference in adults of different educational levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 62-79.
France, M. M., & Henaut, A. (1994). Art, Therefore Entropy. LEONARDO, 27(3), 219-221.
Frijda, N. H. (1994). Varieties of Affect: Emotion and Episodes, Moods, and Sentiments. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson. (Eds.), The nature of emotion (pp. 59-67). New York,: Oxford University.
Fu, F., Chiu, S.-Y., & Su1, C. H. (2007). Measuring the Screen Complexity of Web Pages. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting in Information Environments (pp. 720-729): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social Construction of Communication Technology. Academy of Management Journal of Business Research, 36(5), 921-950.
Furnham, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2004). Personality, intelligence and, art. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 705-715.
Furnham, A., & Walker, J. (2001). The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 997-1017.
Gardenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: the geometry of thoughts.: Bradford Books Bradford Books.
Gaunt, R., Leyens, J. P., & Demoulin, S. (2002). Intergroup relations and the attribution of emotions: Control over memory for secondary emotions associated with ingroup versus outgroup. Journal of Experiment Social Psychology, 38, 508-514.
Gehm, T., & Scherer, K. R. (1988). Relating situation evaluation to emotion differentiation: Nonmetric analysis of cross- cultural questionnaire data.: Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum.. .
Germonprez, M., & Zigurs, I. (2003). Causal Factors for Website Site Complexity. Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Golitsyn, G., & Petrov, V. (1995). Information and Creation: Integrating the "Two Cultures". Basel: Birkhauser.
Granovskaya, R. M., Bereznaya, I. Y., & Grigorieva, A. N. (1987). Whole form representations. In Perception of Form and Forms of Perception (pp. 116-146). New Jersery: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. . Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87-108.
Hall, A. C. (1969). Measures of the complexity of random black and white and coloured stimuli. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 29, 773-774.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension, Garden City. new York Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Hardiman, G. W., & Zernich, T. (1977). Preferences for the visual arts: A review of recent studies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 455-463.
Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K., Jr. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems., 9(1), 93-111.
Hassenzahl, M. (2001). The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN–COMPUTER INTERACTION, 13(4), 481-199.
Heaps, C., & Handel, C. H. (1999). Similarity and features of natural textures. . Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 25, 299-320.
Heckhausen, H. (1964). Complexity in perception: Phenomenal criteria and information theoretic calculus -a note on D. E. Berlyne's "complexity effects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18, 168-173.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Cupchik, G. C. (1985). Individual differences as predictors of preference in visual art. Journal of Personality, 53, 502-515.
Hekkert, P., Peper, C. E., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1994). The effect of verbal instruction and artistic background on the aesthetic judgment of rectangles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 12, 185-203.
Heylighen, F. (1996). What is complexity? , from http://pcp.lanl.gov/COMPLEXI.html
Hochberg, J., & McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figure goodness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46(361-364).
Hoffmann, R., & Krauss, K. (2004). A critical evaluation of literature on visual aesthetics for the web. Paper presented at the 2004 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists Republic of South Africa.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organisations Software of the Mind, . London: McGraw-Hill.
Hogeboom, M., & van Leeuwen, C. (1997). Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity. Acta Psychologica, 95, 141-164.
Isen, A. M. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
Ivory, Y. M., Sinha, R. R., & Hearst, A. M. (2000, June 2000). Preliminary findings on quantitative measures for distinguishing highly rated information-centric web pages. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Human Factors & the Web, Austin, TX,.
Ivory, Y. M., Sinha, R. R., & Hearst, A. M. (2001, March 2001). Empirically validated web page design metrics. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing Pleasure Products: An Induction to New Human Factors. London: Taylor and Francis.
Kahn, P. (1995). Visual cues for local and global coherence in the WWW. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 67-69.
Karvonen, K. (2000). The Beauty of Simplicity. Paper presented at the Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability.
Kemp, A. H., Silberstein, R. B., Armstrong, S. M., & Nathan, P. J. (2004). Gender differences in the cortical electrophysiological processing of visual emotional stimuli. NeuroImage, 16, 632-646.
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1982). Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problems sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 548-570.
Kim, J., Lee, J., & Choi, D. (2003). Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(6), 899-940.
Kim, J., & Moon, J. Y. (1997). Emotional usability of customer interfaces-focusing on cyber banking system interfaces. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 97, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kim, J., & Moon, J. Y. (1998). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interface- trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10, 1-29.
Kloss, M. G., & Dreger, R. M. (1971). Abstract art preferences and temperament traits: A study in the psychology of aesthetics. Journal of Personality Assessment, 35, 375-378.
Knapp, R. H., Brimner, J., & White, M. (1959). Educational level, class status, and aesthetic preference. Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 277-284.
Knapp, R. H., & Wulff, A. (1963). Preferences for abstract and representational art. The Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 255-262.
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205-223.
Kozbelt, A. (2001). Artists as experts in visual cognition. Visual Cognition, 8, 705-723.
Krauss, K. (2004). Visual aesthetics and its effect on communication intent: a theoretical study and website evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Southern African Computer Lecturers Association.
Kurosu, M., & Kashimura, K. (1995). Apparent Usability vs. Inherent Usability : Experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability. Paper presented at the CHI’95 MOSAIC OF CREATIVITY.
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Problems and promises with the circumplex model of emotion. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(25-59).
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508.
LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Li, N. L., & Zhang, P. (2005). Toward e-commerce websites evaluation and use: an affective perspective. Paper presented at the ICIS’05 Journal of the Association for Information Systems Sponsored Theory Development Workshop. from http://web.syr.edu/~nli/
Lindauer, M. S. (1990). Reactions to cheap art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 95-110.
Ling, C., Lopez, M., & Xing, J. (2007). Validating Information Complexity Questionnaires Using Travel Web Sites. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability (Vol. 4550, pp. 901-910): Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Liu, Y. (2000). Engineering Aesthetics and Erog-Aesthetics:Theoretical and Methodological Foundation. Paper presented at the The 5th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering-Theory, Application and Practice.
Locher, J. P. (1995). A Measure of the Information Content of Visual Art Stimuli For Studies in Experimental Aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 13(2), 183-191.
Machleit, K. A., & Eroglu, S. A. (2000). Describing and Measuring Emotional Response to Shopping Experience. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 101-111.
Mackiewicz, K. L., Sarinopoulos, I., Cleven, K. L., & Nitschke, J. B. (2006). The effect of anticipation and the specificity of sex differences for amygdala and hippocampus function in emotional memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 14200-15205.
Marcus, A., & Gould, E. W. (2000). Cultural Dimensions and Global Web User-Interface Design. Interactions, 7 (4 ), 32 - 46
Mattews, K. K. (1999). Aesthetics and Usability. from http://home.att.net/~kiana.matthews/independent_study/Aesthetics_Paper.htm
McBridge, G., King, M. G., & James, J. W. (1965). Social proximity effects on galvanic skin responses in adult humans. Journal of Psychology, 61, 153-157.
Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal Communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality , Social, 14, 261-292.
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, Massachusetts & London: The MIT Press.
Metzger, W. (1965). The foundations of artistic experience. Acta Psychologica, 24, 409-422.
Michailidou, E. (2005). Metrics of visual complexity. Unpublished Master thesis, University of Manchester.
Michailidou, E. (2008). Determining Users’ Perception of Web Page Visual Complexity and Aesthetic Characteristics: Human Centred Web Lab in School of Computer Science, University of Manchester.
Michailidou, E., Quan, H., & Harper, S. (2008). Web Page Visual Complexity: A Relationship Between Two Classification Methods: Human Centred Web Lab,School of Computer Science,University of Manchester.
Mowrer, O. H. (1946). The law of effect and ego psychology. Psychological Review, 53, 32-334.
Nielsen, J. R. (2006, January 20, 2007). F-Shaped Pattern For Reading Web Content., from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html
Norman, D. A. (2002). Emotion Design: Attractive Things Work Better. Interactions, IX(4), 36-42.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Human Computer Interaction, 19, 10-311.
Oliva, A., Mack, M. L., Shrestha, M., & Peeper, A. (2004). Identifying the Perceptual Dimensions of Visual Complexity of Scenes. Paper presented at the the 26th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175.
Ortony, A., Norman, D. A., & Revelle, W. (1988). The Brain Meets the Machine. In J. Fellous & M. Arbib (Eds.), Effective functioning: A three level model of affect, behavior,and cognition. Who Needs Emotions? New York: Oxford University.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenlogy: MIT Press.
Petrov, V. M. (2002). Entropy and Stability in Painting: An information Approach to the Mechanisms of Artistic Creativity. LEONARDO, 35(2), 197-202.
Philippot, P. (1993). Inducing and Assessing Differentiated Emotion-Feeling States in the Laboratory. Cognition and Emotion, 7(2), 171-193.
Philippot, P., & Rimé, B. (1997). The perception of Bodily sensation during emotion: A cross-cultural perspective. . Polish Bulletin of Psychology, 28, 175-188.
Polzella, D. J. (2000). Differences in reactions to paintings by male and female college students. . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 251-258.
Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1970). Freedom of Choice and Behavior in a Physical Setting. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Man and his physical setting (pp. 173-183). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rashevsky, N. (1938). Contribution to the mathematical biophysics of visual perception with special reference to the theory of aesthetic values of geometrical patterbs. Psychometrika, 3, 253-271.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing : 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-442.
Roberts, M. N. (2007). Complexity and aesthetic preference for diverse visual stimuli. Unpublished DOCTORAL THESIS, Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172.
Sautter, P., Hyman, M. R., & Lukosius, V. (2004). E-Tail Atmospherics: A critique of the literature and model extension. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 5(1), 14-24.
Savarese, J. M., & Miller, R. J. (1979). Artistic preferences and cognitive-perceptual style. . Studies in Art Education, 20, 41-45.
Schneider, S. C. (1987). Information Overload: Causes and Consequences. Human Systems Management, 7(2), 143-153.
Shannon, C., & Weaver, W. (1963). Mathematical Theory of Communication: University of Illinois Press.
Silvia, P. J. (2005). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119-133.
Simon, S. J. (2001). The impact of culture and gender on web sites: an empirical study. SIGMIS Database, 32(1), 18-37.
Snider, J. G., & Osgood, C. E. (1969). Semantic Differential Technique. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Song, G. (2007). Analysis of Web Page Complexity Through Visual Segmentation In Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Applications and Services (Vol. 4553/2007, pp. 114-123): Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Stamps, A. E. (2002). Entropy, Visual Diversity, and Preference. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(3), 300-320.
Strother, L., & Kubovy, M. (2003). Perceived complexity and the grouping effect in band patterns. Acta Psychologica, 114, 229-244.
Sutcliffe, A. (2002). Assessing the Reliability of Heuristic Evaluation for Website Attractiveness and Usability. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 137.
Tang, C. K. (1998). Information Rate and Aesthetic Preference of Modern Static Computer Artworks in terms of Viewers. National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
Tarasewich, P., Daniel, H. Z., & Griffin, H. E. (2001). Aesthetics and Web Site Design Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 67-81.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 19(4), 561-570.
Terwilliger, R. F. (1963). Pattern complexity and affective arousal. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 17, 387-395.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1994). Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(1), 167-187.
Thuring, M., Hannemann, J., & Haake, J. M. (1995). Hypermedia and cognition: Designing for comprehension. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 57-66.
Tobacyk, J. J., Myers, H., & Bailey, L. (1981). Field-dependence, sensation-seeking, and preference for paintings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 270-277.
Tractinsky, N. (1997). Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 97, Atlanta.
Tractinsky, N., & A.S. Katz, D. I. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127-145.
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 127-145.
Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Denburg, N. L., & Bechara, A. (2005). Does gender play a role in functional asymmetry of ventromedial prefrontal cortex? Brain, 128(2872-2881).
Tsai, T. W., Chang, T. C., Chen, K. S., & Tsai, I. C. (2006). Intriguing Young People on Website. Paper presented at the Design & Emotion 2006, Gothenburg, Sweden.
van der Helm, P. A. (2000). Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: From surprisals to precisals. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 770-800.
W3C. (1992, 2001). About The World Wide Web. from http://www.w3.org/
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in the dimensional structure of affect—Effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats:Comment on Russell and Carroll Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601-610.
Wikipedia, t. f. e. (2009). Aesthetic Emotion. from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetic_emotions
Wimelius, H. (2004). Fundamentals of user perception and interaction: environmental psychology applied in a study of web pages. PsychNology Journal, 2(3), 282-303.
Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18(1-14).
Wundt, M. E. (1905). Fundamentals of Psychology (7 ed.). Liepzig: Engelman.
Xing, J. (2004). Measures of Information Complexity and the Implications for Automation Design (No. DOT/FAA/AM-04/17). Virginia: Office of Aerospace Medicine Federal Aviation Administration.
Xing, J., & Mannjng, C. (2005). Complexity and automation displays of air control:Literature review and analysis. Washinoton DC: Federal Aviation Administration.

中文部份
李衍達. (2001). 信息世界漫談. 台北: 牛頓.
李雅萍. (2008). 2008年6月全球上網人口達14.6億人. from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
李澤厚. (1996). 美學四講. 台北，台灣: 三民書局
林佳燕. (2000). 大學生個人特質因素色彩嗜好關係之研究. Unpublished 碩士, 國立文通大學.
林彥呈, 許家斌, 王宗興, 管倖生, 張育銘, 陳國祥, et al. (2000). 網頁要素對感性認知影響之研究. 工業設計, 28(2), 122-128.
林珮雯. (2004). 電子商務網站介面設計研究─美感與使用性. 國立交通大學.
徐若倩. (2004). 灰關聯分析與TOPSIS方法應用於企業經營績效評估之研究. Unpublished 碩士論文.
高清漢. (2008). 使用者中心的電玩角色設計. Unpublished 博士論文, 國立交通大學, 新竹.
張華憫, & 鄧怡莘. (2004). 產品設計與情緒研究初探. Paper presented at the 2004 國際設計論壇暨第九屆中華民國設計學會設計學術研討會.
許峻誠. (2001). 網頁風格與視覺要素對設計評價影響之研究. Unpublished 碩士論文, 國立交通大學, 新竹.
郭錦鐘 (Ed.). (1984). 資訊理論與編碼. 台北: 徐氏基金會.
陳世運. (2001). 台灣網友平均每月閱讀網頁數居兩岸三地之冠. from http://www.iamasia.com.tw/
馮正民. (1998). 熵（Entropy）在交通運輸上之意義與應用. 交通運輸, 10, 57-65.
黃希庭. (1998). 人格心理學. 台北: 東華書局.
楊辛. (1993). 美的存在與美特徵. In 吳良鏞 (Ed.), 城市環境美學. 台北、台灣: 地景.
潘文章. (1990). 行為管理：觀念、行為、績效. In. 台北: 三民書局.
賴保禎, & 賴美玲. (2003). 賴氏人格測驗(新訂版)指導手冊. 台北 千華圖書出版社.