:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:存續者偏誤、基金分類與績效持續性之研究
作者:王南喻 引用關係
作者(外文):Nan-Yu Wang
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:商業教育學系
指導教授:陳信憲
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2008
主題關鍵詞:共同基金績效持續性存續者偏誤Mutual fundPerformancePersistenceSurvivorship Bias
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
共同基金績效持續性對投資大眾、投資顧問以及共同基金的經理人而言,是一個非常典型的重要議題。本文藉由考量存續者偏誤、績效衡量指標不同與基金績效分等級時的差異,來分別檢視台灣境內基金的績效持續性的影響,並運用績效二分法、Spearman的等級相關檢定,以及Fama- MacBeth 橫斷面迴歸分析法作檢視及穩健測試,最後提供投資策略給投資人參考。研究結果顯示:(1)檢視股票型基金的績效年持續性時,將受到存續者偏誤的影響。(2)檢視基金績效衡量指標不同時,考量風險調整與否之績效對整體基金績效年持續性之測試結論將相反;對樣本不含清算合併之股票型基金及其他類型基金而言,衡量績效不同對持續性檢測有差異,反之則無;債券型基金則非常穩定。(3)檢視依據績效優劣作等級分法時,績效最佳組與績效最差組皆相對於中等績效基金,更具有兩年績效持續性之強度。(4)本文支持台灣境內共同基金具有某種程度的績效持續性,而且績效持續性的強弱程度會因為依據投資標的分類、績效評估指標不同,呈現不一致的情況。(5)投資人可投資具有兩年績效優越持續性的債券型基金,以獲取正向報酬。
For most of investors, investment advisors, and fund managers, mutual fund performance persistence is an important issue. However, most of the empirical studies do not provide consistent results. This study focuses on factors that measuring the mutual fund performance persistence, such as survivorship bias, definition of performance, and method of return categories. This study emploies a standard statistical test of two-way table which is based on the log odds ratio. The study use Spearman’s rank correlation test and Fama-Machbetch cross-section regresstion anlysis to run robust tests. The empirical results of study support the following notions. First, survivorship bias and different performance affect performance persistence of stock funds and balance funds. Second, there exists a certain degree of persistence in mutual fund performace for different performace and categories. Finally, funds within the best and the worst performance groups have more persistent perfomace in mutual funds classification algorism. Investors can get positive return by investing bond funds.
一、中文文獻
1. 王佳眞、徐辜元宏 (2004)。風險值的應用與台灣共同基金績效指標之持續性,臺大管理論叢,14(2),23-48。
2. 池祥萱、林煜恩與周賓凰 (2007)。基金績效持續與聰明錢效果:台灣實證,管理學報,24(3),307-330。
3. 林修葳、王佳真 (2003)。台灣共同基金績效持續性之研究,管理學報,20(4),655 – 688。
4. 林楚雄、洪秋萍(2005),從獨特性風險之觀點探討我國開放型共同基金之風險分散程度、績效與風險調整行為,管理學報,22(1),109-131。
5. 邱顯比 ( 1993),基金績效評估之理論與實務,證券市場發展季刊,19,33-45。
6. 邱顯比 (1994),基金績效評估之模擬研究,臺大管理論叢,5(2),47-82。
7. 邱顯比、林清珮 (1999)。共同基金分類與基金績效持續性之研究,財務金融學刊,7(2),63-88。
8. 徐清俊、姜志堅 (2003),基金績效持續性與基金類型之相關性研究,遠東學報, 20(4),785-798。

9. 高蘭芬、陳安琳、余育欣與盧正壽 (2007)。運氣好或操作策略好?-拔靴法下共同基金之績效衡量,管理與系統,14(3),341-358。
10. 高蘭芬、陳安琳、湯惠雯與曹美蘭 (2005)。共同基金績效之衡量-模擬分析法之應用,中山管理評論,13(2),667-694。
11. 郭維裕、李愷莉 (2006)。台灣共同基金短期績效持續性的研究-以“漂移者-停駐者”模型為例,經濟論文,34(4),469-504。
12. 陳信憲、王南喻 (2005),美國開放式股票型基金長短期績效持續性之研究,台灣金融財務季刊,6(4),21-39。
13. 陳信憲、王南喻與陳怡珮 (2006),檢視共同基金績效之持續性與其動能週期,臺灣銀行季刊,57(1),77-88。
14. 黃聖棠、溫英幹與鄢欽瑞 (2006)。共同基金之績效評比-台灣地區之實證研究(1995-2002),華岡經濟論叢,5(2),31-67。

二、英文文獻
1. Agarwal, V., and Nail, N.Y. (2000), Multi-period Performance Analysis of Hedge Funds, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(2), 327-342.
2. Berk, J. B., and Green, R. C. (2004), Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets, Journal of Palitical Economy, 112(6), 1269-1295.
3. Blake, C. R. , Elton, E. J., and Gruber, M. J. (1993), The Performance of Bond Mutual Funds, Journal of Business, 66(3), 371-403.
4. Blumen, I., Kogan, M., and McCarthy P. J. (1956), The Industrial Mobility of Labor as a Probability Process, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 51(276), 702-704.
5. Bollen, N. B., and Budde, A. (2005), Short-term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, The Review of Financial Study, 18, 569-597.
6. Brown, S. J., and Goetzmznn, W. N. (1995), Performance Persistence, Journal of Finance, 50, 679-698.
7. Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W., Ibbotson, R. G., and Ross, S. A. (1992), Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies, Review of Financial Studies, 5, 553-580.
8. Carhart, M. M. (1997), On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance, 52, 57-82.
9. Carhart, M. M., Carpenter, J. N., Lynch, A.W., and Musto, D. K. (2002), Mutual Fund Survivorship, Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1439–1463.
10. Carlson, R. S. (1970), Aggregate Performance of Mutual Funds, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 5, 1-31.
11. Carpenter, J., and Lynch, A. (1999), Survivorship Bias and Attrition Effects in Measures of Performance Persistence, Journal of Financial Economics, 54, 337–374.
12. Christensen, R. (1990), Log-Linear Models. Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Conrad, J., and Kaul, G. (1998), An Anatomy of Trading Strategies, Review of Financial Studies, 11(3), 489-519.
14. Deaves, R. (2004), Data-conditioning Biases, Performance, Persistence and Flows: The Case of Canadian Equity Funds, Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(3), 673-695.

15. Droms, W. G. (2006), Hot Hands, Cold Hands: Does Past Performance Predict Future Returns? Journal of Financial Planning, 19(5), 60-69.
16. Droms, W. G., and Walker, D. A. (2001), Performance Persistence of International Mutual Funds, Global Financial Journal, 12, 237-248.
17. Droms, W. G., and Walker, D. A. (2001), Persistence of Mutual Fund Operating Characteristics: Returns Turnover Rates, and Expense Ratios, Applied Financial Economics, 11, 457-466.
18. Dunn, P. C., and Theisen, R. D. (1983), How Consistently Do Active Managers Win? Journal of Portfolio Management, 12, 47-51.
19. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., and Blake, C. R. (1996), The Perisitence of Risk-adjusted Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, 69, 133-157.
20. Goetzmann, W. N., and Ibbotson, R. G. (1994), Do Winners Repeat? Patterns in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 9-18.
21. Grinblatt, M., and Titman, S. (1992), The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Finance, 47, 1977-1984.
22. Gruber, M. J. (1996), Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds, Journal of Finance, 51, 783–810.
23. Hendricks, D., Patel, J., and Zeckhauser, R. (1993), Hot Hand in Mutual Funds: Short-Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974-1988, Journal of Finance, 48(1), 93-130.
24. Hendricks, D., Patel, J., and Zeckhauser, R. (1997), The J-shape of Performance Persistence Given Survivorship Bias, Review of Economics & Statistics, 79(2), 161-166.
25. Horst, J. T., and Verbeek, M. (2000), Estimating Short-Run Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, The Review of Economices and Statistics, 82(4), 646-655.
26. Hsu, C. S., and Lin, J. R. (2007), Mutual Fund Performance and Persistence in Taiwan: A Non-Parametric Approach, The Service Industries Journal, 27(5), 509- 523.
27. Huij, J., and Derwall, J. (2008), “Hot Hands” in Bond Funds, Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 559-572.

28. Huij, J., and Verbeek, M. (2007), Cross-sectional Learning and Short-run Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 973-997.
29. Jensen, M C. (1972), Optimal utilization of market forecasts and the evaluation of investment portfolios, Mathematical Methods in Investment and Finance, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
30. Jensen, M. C. (1968), The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-64, Journal of Business, 23, 389-416.
31. Kahn, R. N., and Rudd, A. (1995), Does Historical Performance Predict Future Performance? Financial Analysis Journal, 51, 43-52.
32. Malkiel, B. G. (1995), Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991, Journal of Finance, 50, 549-572.
33. Roll, R. (1978), Ambiguity when performance is measured by the security market line, Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1051-1069.
34. Sharpe, W. F., (1966), Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, 39, 119-138.
35. Shu, P. G., Yeh, Y. H., and Yamada, T. (2002), The Behavior of Taiwan Mutual Fund Investors-performance and Fund Flows, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 10, 583-600.
36. Treynor, J. L. (1965), How to Rate Management of Investment Funds, Harvard Business Review, 43, 63-75.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE