:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:建構專利佈局之分析模式:專利家族觀點
作者:蘇芳霈
作者(外文):Fang-pei Su
校院名稱:雲林科技大學
系所名稱:管理研究所博士班
指導教授:賴奎魁
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:專利家族專利優先權專利組合專利佈局patent familypatent prioritypatent portfolio
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:51
甚多公司擁有大量專利,然而其中只有少數公司有能力實現專利權的價值,以創造其最大財務資本。故對於一向重視經營績效的企業而言,如何將智財資本具體轉換為財務資本,顯然為一大經營課題。本文由公司內部的分析觀點,提出一套以專利優先權為基礎的專利組合方法-專利優先權方法(Patent Priority Approach, PPA),由涉入侵權訴訟的系爭專利作為資料檢索的起始點,建立其專利家族以形成研究之資料集,藉由使用專利優先權之主張與被主張的關係,將之建構為專利優先權網絡(Patent Priority Network, PPN);繼而提出演算法,以推導出關鍵鏈、顯著鏈和核心專利候選人的篩選法則。並以一醫療器材公司為例,說明PPA概念與方法的運用。整合上述演算法則,可以進行分析、評估及預測公司專利組合的良窳,進而將公司的智財資本加以體現為市場價值,提昇經營績效。研究中所提的方法與結果對於公司管理者,如CEO、CTO、R&D經理、智財經理等,可提供決策參考的洞見。
Many firms own a large number of patents, but just little ones can create their maximum financial capital through realizing the value of patents. Thus, how to transform the intellectual property capital into physical financial capital is an important issue of study for companies concerned with management performance. This study proposes an analysis approach, named Patent Priority Approach (PPA), based on patent priority from the company’s internal viewpoint. The approach initiates the steps of data search in the disputed patent, building the dataset from its patent family members, using the relation of claiming and be claimed of the priority patents when constructing the patent priority network. Therefore presents algorithms for critical chain, significant chain and core patent candidates. We illustrated the concepts and applications of PPA with the case of a medical device firm. Integrated the aforementioned information, the company’s patent portfolio strategy can be analyzed, evaluated, and predicted systematically. In addition, the market value can be realized to improve management performance. The conclusion of portfolio approaches and applications will provide insights for managers such as CEO, CTO, R&D managers and intellectual property managers.
1.肖曉堃,2008,”270萬美元缺口 自主研發第三代支架遭遇產業困局”,39健康網,http://cj.39.net/yphy/085/29/469749.html,Last visited at 05/20/2009。
2.洪永杰,2005,”專利申請的策略與專利佈局的模式”,http://designer.mech.yzu.edu.tw/,Last visited at 01/04/2009。
3.翁順裕,賴奎魁,陳孟祺,2008,”將專利組合鑲嵌至技術規劃中”,管理與系統,第十五卷第二期,頁323-354,4月。new window
4.國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心,2008,”再談專利佈局”,http://cdnet.stpi.org.tw/techroom/ pclass/2008/pclass_08_A022.htm,Last visited at 01/04/2009。
5.黃博偉,2007,「2006年全球醫療器材前五大併購案分析」,IT IS智網,http://www.itis.org.tw/rptDetailFree.screen?rptidno=5D74A3717128B5C4482572 EC00043180,5月31日,Last visited at 02/04/2008。
6.葉哲政、薛乃綺,2005,”生醫用金屬產業全球佈局與競爭策略”,經濟部科技專案成果。
7.Allison, J.R., Lemley, M.A., Moore, K.A. and Trunkey, R. D., 2004, “Valuable Patents”, Georgetown Law Journal, vol.92, no.3, pp.435-479.
8.Ashton, W. B.and Sen, R. K., 1988. “Using Patent Information in Technology Business Planning-I”, Research Technology Management, vol.31, no.6, pp.42-46.
9.Barney, J. 1991, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, vol.17, no.1, pp.99-120.
10.Breitzman, A. F.and Mogee, M. E., 2002, “The Many Applications of Patent Analysis”, Journal of Information Science, vol.28, no.3, pp.187-205.
11.Brockhoff, K., 1994, “R&D Project Terminations Decisions by Discriminate Analysis- An International Comparison”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol.41, no.3, pp.245-254.
12.Brockhoff, K., 1992, “Instruments for Patent Data Analysis in Business Firms”, Technovation, vol.12, no.1, pp.41-58.
13.Brockhoff, K. and Chakrabarti, A. K., 1998, “R&D/Marketing Linkage and Innovation Strategy: Some West-German Experience”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol.35, no.3, pp.167-174.
14.Brockhoff, K., Chakrabarti, A. K.and Hauschildt, J. 1999, The Dynamics of Innovation: Strategic and managerial implications, Springer.
15.Brockhoff, K., Ernst, H., and Hundhausen, E., 1999, “Gains and Pains from Licensing - Patent-portfolios as Strategic Weapons in the Cardiac Rhythm Management Industry”, Technovation, vol.19, no.10, pp.605-614.
16.Cronin, B. “Planning an international patent filing strategy: cost, cash-flow and capacity to succeed,” http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/ 117356325/PDFSTART, Last visited at 12/11/2008.
17.Davis, J.L. and Harrison, S. S.,2001, Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18.Deng, Z., Lev, B. and Narin, F., 1999, “Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance”, Financial Analysts Journal, pp.20-32, May/June.
19.Ernst, H., 1995, “Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and their Relationship to Company Performance”, Technovation, vol.15, no.4, pp.225-240.
20.Ernst, H., 1997, “The Use of Patent Data for Technology Forecasting: The Diffusion of CNC-technology in the Machine Tool Technology”, Small business Economics, vol.9, no.4, pp.361-381.
21.Ernst, H., 1998, “Patent Portfolios for Strategic R&D Planning”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol.15, no.4, pp.279-308.
22.Ernst, H., 2002, “Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol.4, no.1, pp.1-40.
23.Ernst, H., Fabry, B., and Soll, J. H., 2004, “Enhancing Market-oriented R&D Planning by Integrated Market and Patent Portfolios”, Journal of Business Chemistry, vol.1, no.1, pp.2-13.
24.Ernst, H. and Teichert, T. 1998, “The R&D/Marketing Interface and Single Informant Bias in NPD Research: An Illustration of a Benchmarking Case Study”, Technovation, vol.18, no.12, pp.721-739.
25.Granstrand, O., 1999, The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, MA, USA.
26.Hall, B. H., 1999, “Innovation and Market Value”, NBER Working Paper #6984, Cambridge, MA.
27.Hall, B. H., Jaffe A. and Trajtenberg, M., 2000, “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look”, University of California at Berekeley, Department of Economics Working Paper # 00-277, Berkeley, CA.
28.Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M., 2005, “Market Value and Patent Citations”, Rand Journal of Economics, vol.36, no.1, pp.16-38.
29.Harhoff, D., Scherer, F.M., Vope, K., 2003, “Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights”, Research Policy, vol.32, no.8, pp.1343-1363.
30.Haupt, R., Kloyer, M. and Lange, M., 2007, “Patent Indicators for the Technology Llife Cycle Development”, Research Policy, vol.36, no.3, pp.387-398.
31.Heyman, P. D., 2005, “Using a Patent Portfolio to Defend Against a Patent Infringement Suit”, Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, vol.17, no.7, pp.9-15.
32.Lai, K.K., Su, F.P., Weng, C.S., Lin, M.L. and Cheng, C. L., 2007, ”Co-opetition Strategy from the Patent Analysis Perspective: The Case of Stent Market”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, vol.4, no.2, pp.137-153.
33.Mintzberg, H and McHugh, A., 1985, “Strategy Formation in an Adhocracy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.30, no.2, pp.160-197.
34.Narin, F., E. Noma and R. Perry; 1987, “Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength”, Research Policy, vol.16, pp.143–155.
35.Parchomovsky, G.. and Wagner, R.P., 2004, “Patent Portfolios”, The Berkeley Electronic Press. http://lsr.nellco.org/upenn/wps/papers/51, Lasted visited at 11/11/2008.
36.Pegels, C. C. and Thirumurthy, M. V., 1996, “The Impact of Technology Strategy on Firm Performance”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol.43, pp.246-249.
37.Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E. and Hannan, M.T., 1996, “Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991”, American Journal of Sociology, vol.102, no.3, pp.659-689.
38.Putnam, J., 1996, The Value of International Patent Rights, Ph.D.Thesis. Yale University, Yale.
39.Robinson, C., P. Boyle and S. Al-Jurf; 2005, “Court Finds Patent Creates Presumption of Market Power in Antirust Tying Actions”, Washington Legal Foundation, vol.15, no.6, pp.1-2.
40.Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. and Edvisson, L., 1997, Intellectual Capital: Navigating the New Business Landscape, Macmillan Business, London.
41.Sherry, E.F. and Teece, D. J., 2004, “Royalties, Evolving Patent Rights, and the Value of Innovation”, Research Policy, vol.33, pp.179-191.
42.Simmons, E.S., 2009, “’Black Sheep’ in the Patent Family”, World Information Patent, vol.31, pp.11-18.
43.Tang, V. and Huang, B., 2002, “Patent Litigation as a Leading Market Indicator”, International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialization, vol.1, no.3, pp.280-291.
44.Teece, D. J., 1986, “Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing, and Public Policy,” Research Policy, vol.15, pp.285-305.
45.Teece, D. J., 2000, Managing Intellectual Capital-Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions, OXFORD University Press.
46.Teece, D. J., 2006, “Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”, Research Policy, vol.35, pp.1131-1146.
47.Thomas, P. and McMillan, G. S., 2001, “Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D as a Business”, Engineering Management Journal, vol.13, pp.9-14 , September.
48.Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno and N. Van Zeebroeck, 2008, “A Brief History of Space and Time: The Scope-year Index as a Patent Value Indicator Based on Families and Renewals”, Scientometrics, vol.75, no.2, pp.319-338.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE