:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以指示線索探討不同訊息處理策略者之顯控面板設計
作者:陳俊瑋
作者(外文):Chunwei Chen
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:設計學研究所博士班
指導教授:李傳房
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2009
主題關鍵詞:使用者介面設計產品設計眾用設計使用性Product designUser-interface designInclusive designUsability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
本研究旨在探究指示線索增進全面型資訊處理策略者(holistic information-processing strategy user)操作顯控裝置(control-display device)作業績效的有效性。在日常生活中,顯控裝置被許多使用者使用。由於顯控裝置不可能限定只被某類使用者可使用,故顯控裝置的設計在以人為導向的設計思考當下,需採用眾用設計(all-inclusive design)的概念進行設計,方可滿足不同使用者可同時使用的需求。吾人發現,日常生活中,並非所有的人都具有相同的顯控裝置作業能力,例如,全面型資訊處理策略者,往往無法有效操作顯控裝置。因此,在滿足不同使用者均可使用顯控裝置的前提下,吾人以為有必要找尋可增進全面型資訊處理策略者操作顯控裝置作業績效的顯控裝置設計方法,設計顯控裝置,以使顯控裝置能被全面型資訊處理策略使用者所使用。據此,本研究提出指示線索作為解決方案,並以1.假設測試研究、2.實例驗證研究與3.案例示範等探討之。假設測試研究包含兩實驗:訊息處理策略影響效應之驗證實驗與指示線索效益之驗證實驗等兩實驗。在訊息處理策略影響效應之驗證實驗中,吾人以ERP(event-related potential)量測全面型策略者(holistic strategy user)與細節型策略者(analytic strategy user)操作一致性(correspondent)與非一致性(non-correspondent)刺激反應配對任務時的P300反應差異,實驗所獲得的結果可用來驗證訊息處理之策略影響效應。在指示線索效益之驗證實驗中,吾人則以同樣設計有指示刺激線索(stimulus-directed cue)與指示反應線索(response-directed cue)的一致性與非一致性刺激反應配對任務來驗證指示線索之效益。至於在實例驗證研究中,吾人則以具有指示控制鈕線索(control unit-directed cue)、具有指示儀表器線索(display-unit directed cue)與不具有指示線索的三種顯控裝置,進一步驗證假設測試研究所獲得的實驗結果。最後,本研究再以公車駕控面板為範例,示範指示線索的實務設計方法。本研究所提出的設計方法可作為人機介面設計師設計眾用顯控面板的參考依據。
This paper discusses the effectiveness of using indexical cues to enhance the performances of holistic information-processing strategy users when operating a control-display device. Control-display device used in daily life should not be limited to one or a few specific groups of users no matter what system the control-display device is for. As a result it may be necessary to adopt a control-display device with inclusive design. It is evident that analytic information-processing strategy users respond efficiently and correctly to a control unit and its associated display/stimulus, while holistic information-processing strategy users are often confused under the same circumstances. This implies that the current control-display devices do not meet the needs of users with different information-processing strategies, such as people using a holistic information-processing strategy. Therefore, it is important to design a control-display device that can enhance the performances of holistic information- processing strategy users, so that more users can maintain a safe and efficient operation of a control-display device regardless of their information-processing strategies. We therefore proposed the indexical cue approach as a solution. We verify our approach by means of a hypothesis test (chapter 2), a case-based verification (chapter 3) and a case demonstration (chapter 4). In the hypothesis test, an information-processing strategies effect experiment examines the effect of the information-processing strategies, and an indexical cue effect experiment examines the effect of the indexical cue. In the information-processing strategies effect experiment, an event-related potential measurement of P300 is used to test the information-processing strategies effect while a participant operates a correspondent and a non-correspondent stimulus-response pairing task. In the indexical cue effect experiment, a correspondent and a non-correspondent stimulus-response pairing task, both equipped with stimulus-directed cue and response-directed cue, are used to test the effect of the indexical cue. In the case-based verification study, we verify the experimental results from the hypothesis using a control-display device equipped with control unit-directed cue (response-directed cue), a control-display device equipped with display unit-directed cue (stimulus-directed cue) and a control-display device equipped without an indexical cue. In the case demonstration study, we adopt a control unit-directed cue and a display unit-directed cue to design a control panel on a bus to demonstrate how the indexical cue approach can be applied in practice. The experimental results in this study provide user interface designer a solution for designing a control-display device suitable for more users with holistic information -processing strategies.
Adam, J. J., Paas, F. G. W. C., Teeken, J. C., van Loon, E. M., van Boxtel, M. P. J., Houx, P. J., Jolles, J. 1998. Effects of Age on Performance in a Finger-Precuing Task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 870-883.
Anzola, G. P., Frison, G. B. 1992. The spatial distribution of attention in S-R compatibility. Behavioral Brain Research, 49, 189-196.
Abascal, J., Nicolle, C. 2005. Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interacting with Computers, 17, 484-505.
Bakay, E. P., Marton, M., Rigo, P., Balazs, L. 1998. Responses to irrelevant probes during task-induced negative and positive shifts. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 28, 248–261.
Baumgartner, L., Valko, T., Esslen, M., Jäncke, L. 2006. Neural correlate of spatial presence in an arousing and non interactive virtual reality: an EEG and psychophysiology study. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9, 30–45.
Bayerl, J., Miller, D., Lewis, S. 1988. Consistent layout of function keys and screen labels speeds user responses. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, 24–28 October, Santa, Monica, Canada, 344–346.
Braddick, O. J., O’Brian, J. M., Wattam-Bell, J., Atkinson, J., Hartley, T., Turner, R. 2001. Brain areas sensitive to visual motion. Perception, 30, 61–72.
Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Jonides, J., Smith, D. D., Noll, D. C. 1997. A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage, 5, 49–62.
Brumby, M. N. 1982. Consistent differences in cognitive styles shown for qualitative biological problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 244–257.
Bystrom, K., Barfield, W, Hendrix, C. 1999. A conceptual model of the sense of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8, 241–244.
Canfield, A. 1980. Learning styles inventory form S-A: Manual, Humanic Media, Birmingham, MI.
Chan, H. S., Chan, K. W. L. 2005. Spatial S–R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human–machine interface design. Displays, 263, 109–119.
Chan, H. S., Shum, V. W. Y., Law, H.W., Hui, I. K. 2003. Precise effects of control position, indicator type, and scale side on human performance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 223, 380–386.
Chen, S. Y., Ford, N. 1998. Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia based learning system: An individual differences approach. Knowledge Organization, 25, 67–78.
Chan, C. H., Wong, W. K., Lee, M. C., Chi, I. 2009. Modified automatic teller machine prototype for older adults: A case study of participative approach to inclusive design, Applied Ergonomics, 40, 151-160.
Chou, H., Wang, T. 2000. The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 455-472.
Coombs, M. J., Gibson, R., Alty, J. L. 1982. Acquiring a first computer language: A study of individual differences. In Coombs, M.J., Atly, J.L. (Eds.), Computer skills and the user interface. London: Academic Press.
Cotton, B., Tzeng, O. J., HardyckSpatial, C. 1980. Role of cerebral hemispheric processing in the visual half-field stimulus-response compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 13-23.
Cohen, J. D., Forman, S. D., Braver, T. S., Casey, B. J., Servan-Schreiber, D., Noll, D. C. 1994. Activation of prefrontal cortex in a non-spatial working memory task with functional MRI. Human Brain Map, 1, 293–304.new window
Creem, S. H., Proffitt, D. R.2001. Defining the cortical visual systems: “What”, “Where”, and “How”. Acta Psychological, 107, 43–68.
Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M. 1995. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In Epstein, W., Rogers, S. (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition, Academic Press, CA.
D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., Zarahn, E., Ballard, D., Shin, R. K., Lease, J. 1998. Functional MRI studies of spatial and non-spatial working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 1–13.
Dewey, J. 1938. Experience and education, MacMillan, New York.
DeAngelis, G., Newsome, W. 1999. Organization of disparity-selective neurons in macaque area MT of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1398–1415.
Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., Paprotta, I. 1998. Selective dorsal and ventral processing: evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Visual Cognition, 5, 81–107.
Donchin, E., Coles, G. H. 1988. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral Brain Science. 11, 357–374.
Draper, J. V., Kaber, D. B., Usher, J. M. 1999. Speculations on the value of telepresence. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 2, 349–362.
Dubner, R., Zeki, S. 1971. Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulks in the monkey. Brain Research, 35, 528–532.
Ellis, D., Ford, N., Wood, F. 1985. Hypertext and learning styles. Learning Technology Unit. Sheffield: Employment Department.
Entwistle, N. J. 1981. Styles of learning and reaching. London: Wiley.
Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., Hounsell, D. J. 1979. Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365–380.
Eriksen, C. W. 1990. Attentional search of the visual field. In Brogan, D. (Ed.), Visual search. London: Taylor & Francis.
Fitts, P. M., Seeger, C. M. 1953. S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
Fitts, P. M. Deininger, R. L. 1964. S-R compatibility: Correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 483-492.
Ford, N. 1985. Learning styles and strategies of postgraduate students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 65– 77.
Ford, N. 1995. Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: An individual differences approach. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 43, 241–259.
Ford, N., Ford, R. 1992. Learning strategies in an ideal computer assisted learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 195–211.
Glicksohn, J., Golan, H. 2001. Personality, cognitive style and assortative mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1199-1209.
Ghozlan, R. 1997. Simon''s experiments and stimulus–response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic, responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 841, 35–45.
Gruenfeld, L. W., Weissenberg, P. 1974. Relationship between supervisory cognitive style and social orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 386-388.
Hamstra, S. 1989. The P300 evoked potential waveform component and mental capacity. MA Thesis. York University, Toronto.
Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P. 1987. Evidence for stimulus-response compatibility effects in a divided visual field study of cerebral lateralization. Acta Psychologica, 66, 127-138.
Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., Ehrenstein, W. H. 1990. Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in Psychology, 65, 117-143.
Hsu, S. H., Peng, Y. 1993. Control/display relationship of the four-burner stove: a reexamination. Human, Factors, 35, 745–749.
Huckabee, M. W. 1974. Introversion extraversion and imagery cognitive style. Psychological Reports, 43, 453-454.
Jonassen, D. H., Grabowski, B. 1993. Individual differences and instruction: an integrated model of cognitive styles. Educational Psychology, 7, 251–268.
Jung. C. 1926. Psychological types or the psychology of individuation. Harcourt Brace, New York.
Kayaert, G., Biederman, I., Beeck, H. P. O., Vongels, R. 2005. Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 212–224.
Keates, S., Clarkson, J., Robinson, P. 2002. Developing a practical inclusive interface design approach. Interacting with Computers, 14, 271-299.
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., Knill, D. C., 1997. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception, 26, 171–192.
Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R. Toplak, M. E. West, R. F., Keith, E. S. 2002. Heuristic and analytic processing: age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26-52.
Kolb, D. 1976. Learning Style Inventory technical manual, McBer, Boston.
Kolb, D. 1985. The Learning Style Inventory, McBer, Boston.
Korchin, S. J. 1986. Field dependence, personality theory, and clinical research. In Bertini, M., Pizzamiglio, L., Wapner, S. (Eds), Field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Konishi, S., Kawazu, M., Uchida, I., Kikyo, H., Asakura, I., Miyashita, Y. 1999. Contribution of working memory to transient activation in human inferior prefrontal cortex during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Cerebra Cortex, 9, 745–753.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V. 1989. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification, Psychological Review, 96, 101–124.
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., Depickere, A. 2005. What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system? Computers & Education, 45, 1-19.
Lee, J. 2007. The effects of visual metaphor and cognitive style for mental modeling in a hypermedia-based environment. Interacting with Computers, 19, 614-629.
Mazard, A, Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Crivello, F., Mazoyer, B., Mellet, E. 2004. A PET meta-analysis of object and spatial mental imagery. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 673–695.
Messick, S. 1984. The nature of cognitive styles: problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.
Messick, S. 1994. The matter of style: manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychology, 29, 121–136.
Milner, A. D., Goodale, M. A. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford University Press.
Mishkin, M., Unterleider, L. G., Macko, K. A. 1983. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414–417.
Myers, I. B. 1962. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Niaz, M. 1994. Pascual-Leone''s theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Educational Psychology, 14, 23–43.
Nicoletti, R. 1982. Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 664-673.
Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C. 1984. Right–left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333–345.
Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Ladavas, E. 1990. Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors. Acta Psychological, 57, 133-143.
Ong, C., Lai, J. 2006. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816-829.
Palmquist, R. A. 2001. Cognitive style and users’ metaphors for the web: an exploratory study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 24-32.
Pask, G. 1976a. Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 12–25.
Pask, G. 1976b. Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.
Pask, G. 1976c. Conversation theory: Applications in education and epistemology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pask, G. l979. Final report of S.S.R.C. Research programmer HR 2708. Richmond: System Research Ltd.
Pask, G. 1988. Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual or learning style. In Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
Pask, G., Scott, B. C. E. 1972. Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 4, 242–253.
Pask, G., Scott, B. C. E. 1973. CASTE: A system for exhibiting learning strategies and regulating uncertainty. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 5, 17–52.
Pasupathy, A., Connor, C. E. 2001. Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary confirmation. Neurophysiology, 86, 2505–2519.
Pascual-Leone, J. 1984. Attention, dialectic, and mental effort: toward an organismic theory of life stages. In Commons, M. L., Richards, F.A., Armon, G. (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development. New York: Praeger.
Pascual-Leone, J. 1987. Organismic process model of neo-Piagetian theories: a dialectical causal account of cognitive development. In: Demetriou, A. (Ed.), The neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Towards an integration. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Pascual-Leone, J. 1989. An organismic process model of Witkin''s field-dependence–independence. In: Globerson, T. Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive Style and Cognitive Development. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
Pascual-Leone, J. 1995. Learning and development as dialectical factors in cognitive growth. Human Development, 38, 338–348.
Pascual-Leone, J., Hamstra, S., Benson, N., Khan, I., England, R. 1990. The P300 event-related potential and mental capacity. Toronto.
Pascual-Leone, J., Baillargeon, R. H. 1994. Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral development, 17, 161-200.
Pennings, A. 1988. The development of strategies in embedded figures task. International Journal of Psychology, 23, 65-78.
Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J., Austin, E. J. 2005. Are intelligence and personality related to verbal-imagery and holistic-analytic cognitive styles? Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 201-213.
Phillips, J. G., Triggs, T. J., Meehan, J. W. 2003. Conflicting Directional and Locational Cues Afforded by Arrowhead Cursors in Graphical User Interfaces, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 75-87.
Posner, M. I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E.1990. The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.
Praamstra, P., Oostenveld, R. 2003. Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: a high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus–response compatibility. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 309-322.
Rayner, S. G. 2004. Cognitive Styles and Learning Styles. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 36, 2171-2175.
Regenbrecht, H., Schubert, T. 2002. Real and illusory interactions enhance presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 11, 425–434.
Riding, R. J. 1991. Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
Riding, R. J., Cheema, I. 1991. Cognitive styles: an overview and integration. Educational Psychology; 11, 219-215.
Riding, R.J., Pearson, F. 1994. The relationship between cognitive style and intelligence. Educational Psychology, 14, 413–425.
Riding, R. J., Sanabani, S. 1998. The effect of cognitive style, age, gender and structure on the recall of prose passages. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 173-185.
Riding, R.J., Sadler Smith, E. 1992. Type of instructional material, cognitive style and learning performance. Educational Studies, 18, 323–340.
Riding, R. J., Wicks, B. J. 1978. The effect of extraversion and presentation order in learning from picture commentary sequences in children. Educational Review, 5, 15-22.
Robertson, I.T. 1977. An investigation of some relationships between learning and personality. In Schmeck, R.R. (Ed.). Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
Roswarski, T. E., Proctor, R.W. 2000. Auditory stimulus–response compatibility: is there a contribution, 17, of stimulus-hand correspondence? Psychological Research, 63, 148–158.
Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Canoune, J., H., Ritter, W. 1990. Short-term memory storage and retention: an event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalogrical Clinging Neurophysiology, 76, 419–439.
Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Canoune, J., H. L., Ritter, W., Hammer, M. 1990. Multiple sources of P3b associated with different types of information. Psychophysiology, 27, 157–176.
Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Grafman, J. J., Canoune, H., Ritter, W. 1992. Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 1, 53–66.new window
Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Grafman, J. J., Canoune, H., Ritter, W. 1997. Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychological, 35, 195–209.
Sanders, M. S., McCormick, E. J. 1992. Human Factors in Enginerreing and Design. Mcgrawhill, New York.
Sadler-Smith, E. 2001. The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 609-616.
Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H. 1999. Embodied presence in virtual environments. In Paton, R., Neilson, I. (Eds.), Visual Representations and Interpretations, Springer-Verlag, London.
Schmeck, R. R. 1988. Learning strategies and learning styles. New York: Plenum Press.
Schwartz, S. 1975. Individual differences in cognition: Some relationships between personality and memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 2 17-225.
Shiffrin, R. M. 1988. Attention. In Atkinson, R. C. Hermstein, R. Lindzey, J. G., Luce, R. D. (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.
Simon, J. R., Rudell, A. P. 1967. Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.
Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., Craft, J. L. 1970. Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L. 1997. Are Cognitive Styles Still in Style? American Psychologist, 52, 700-712.
Stieben, J. 1994. Cognitive-style correlates of endogenous evoked potentials: a convergent-operations study of Pascual-Leone''s model. MA Thesis, York University, Toronto.
Soenens, B., Duriez, B., Goossens, L. 2005. Social–psychological profiles of identity styles: attitudinal and social-cognitive correlates in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 107-125.
Thompson, V. A. 2001. Intelligence, cognitive style and rationality: is being rational smart? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 77-79.
Treisman, A. M., Gelade, G. 1980. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. M., Gormican, S. 1988. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.
Tucker, P., Warr, P. 1996. Intelligence, elementary cognitive components, and cognitive styles as predictors of complex task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 91-102.
Umilta, C., Nicoletti, R. 1990. Stimulus-Response Compatibility. New York: North-Holland.
Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., Heilman. K. M. 1988. Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia, 26, 435-444.
Verfaellie, M., Bowers, D., Heilman. K. M. 1990. Attentional processes in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Advances in Psychology, 65, 261-275.
Vidyasagar, T. R., Pammer, K. 1999. Impaired visual search in dyslexia relates to the role of the magnocellular pathway in attention. Neuroreport, 26, 1283–1287.
Wallace, R. J. 1971. S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
Warber, D. 1989. The biological boundaries of cognitive styles: a neuropsychological analysis. In Globerson, T., Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive Style and Cognitive Development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Waterworth, J., Waterworth, E. 2001. Focus, locus and senses: the 3 dimensions of virtual experience. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4, 203–214.
Weller, H.G., Repman, J., Rooze, G. E. 1994. The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools, 10, 401–420.
Weller, H. G., Repman, J., Lan, W., Rooze, G. 1995. Improving the effectiveness of learning through hypermedia-based instruction: the importance of learner characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 451-465.
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., Karp, S. A. 1962. Psychological Differentiation, Studies of Development. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Witkin, H. A., Goodenough, D. R. 1982. Cognitive Styles: Essence and Origins-Field Dependence and Field Independence. New York: International Universities Press.
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., Karp, S. A. 1971. A Manual For The Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test. Consulting Psychologist, Palo Alto.
Witkin, H. A. 1973. The role of cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher—student relations Montréal, Canada, Paper presented at a Symposium Sponsored by the Graduate Record Examination Board.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D. R., Cox, P.W. 1977. Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.
Witmer, B. G., Singer, M. M. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 225–240.
Wood, F., Ford, N., Miller, D., Sobczyk, G., Duffin, R. 1996. Information skills, searching behavior and cognitive styles for student centered learning: a computer assisted learning approach. Journal of Information Science, 22, 79–92.
Wood, F., Ford, N., Walsh, C. 1992. Online searching and cognitive styles. London: British Library.
Yonas, A., Goldsmith, L. T., Hallstrom, J. L. 1978. Development of sensitivity to information provided by cast shadows in pictures. Perception, 7, 333–341.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE