:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:在行動學習環境下內容呈現模式與學習者程度對認知負荷與英語聽力之影響
作者:陳怡容
作者(外文):I-Jung Chen
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:技術及職業教育研究所
指導教授:張基成
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2010
主題關鍵詞:認知負荷學習者程度聽力理解行動學習Cognitive loadLanguage proficiencyListening comprehensionMobile learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究嘗試在行動學習的環境下探討教學內容呈現模式對認知負荷與英語聽力之影響。研究重點有三:首先,當英語學習者在進行聽力訓練時,同時提供文字輔助,是否因為「模式效應」(the modality effect)而降低認知負荷,還是因為「重複效應」(the redundancy effect)而增加認知負荷,亦或以上兩種效應會根據學生的專家程度 (the expertise level),而造成不同程度的認知負荷,即所謂的「專家反向效應」。其次,本研究探討,前述的三種效應對學習成效的影響。本研究的第三重點是探討認知負荷和學習成效的關係。另外,在教學實驗完畢後,藉由問卷調查學生對於行動學習和文字輔助的意見與感受,作為研究發現的佐證。研究對象為162位科技大學主修應用外語的學生。利用學生校外教學的機會,以行動載具(PDA)同時進行英語聽力訓練。學生以隨機方式被分派到「單一模式」(single mode)組或「雙重模式」(dual mode)組。「單一模式」即只有提供聽力段落;相對地,「雙重模式」提供聽力段落和同步的文字輔助。
研究結果顯示,學習者英文能力在多媒體內容呈現模式對於認知負荷的影響具有調節作用;能力低的學生受惠於文字輔助,而降低認知負荷的程度。然而,學習者英文能力在多媒體內容呈現模式對於學習成效的影響則無調節作用。亦即,不管學習者的語言能力如何,「雙重模式」組的聽力測驗成績皆高於「單一模式」組。最後,認知負荷和學習成效呈現負相關的關係。
本研究建議: (一) 行動學習可以提供另一種學習概念,並非取代傳統學習;(二) 進行行動學習,由於環境的變化和周遭可能的突發事件,對學生造成較高的認知負荷,教師需要仔細規劃教材的呈現方式和課前活動 (pre-task activities);(三) 由於行動學習的周邊環境容易讓學生分心,故提供文字輔助有助於學習者降低認知負荷與提高學習表現。
This study explored the effects of content presentation mode on students’ cognitive load and listening comprehension in a mobile learning context. The first focus of this study was to investigate the effects of modality effects and its possible interaction with learners’ language proficiency level on the cognitive load. A second focus of the study was to probe the influence of these factors on students’ English listening comprehension. The third focus examined the correlation between cognitive load and task performance. Finally, students’ opinions regarding mobile learning treatment were collected to triangulate statistical results.
One hundred and sixty two students majoring in English in a technology university, using PDA as the learning tool for mobile listening comprehension training, were randomly assigned to one of the two presentation modes: (1) the single mode in which students were engaged in auditory materials only and (2) the dual mode in which they were exposed to audio and textual inputs simultaneously. Hierarchical regression was employed to examine the moderating effect of the learner’s proficiency levels. The results confirmed the moderator role of English proficiency in the modality effect on cognitive load; students with lower proficiency appeared to be more perceptive of the text aid. However, the moderating effect was not obtained on the task performance. Students provided with dual mode outperformed their counterpart group provided with single mode treatment. Finally, cognitive load was negatively correlated with task performance.
This study recommends that written text be displayed when students are engaged in a mobile English listening comprehension task to reduce learners’ cognitive load and to enhance listening comprehension. Also, the study provided pedagogical implications for content presentation when adopting mobile language learning.
Adcock, A. B. (2004). The interaction of learner expertise and instructional role of a pedagogical agent on learner perception of agent, perceived cognitive load and task performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Memphis, Memphis.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology mediated learning—a call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 1-10.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 417-423.
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1975). Working memory. In G. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (V.8, 47-89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Berne, J. E. (1998). Examining the relationship between L2 listening research, pedagogical theory, and practice. Foreign Language Annals, 31(2), 169-190.
Bird, S. A., & Williams, J. N. (2002). The effect of bimodal input on implicit and explicit memory: An investigation into the benefits of within-language subtitling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(4), 509-533.
Bobis, J., Sweller, J., & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary school geometry task. Learning and Instruction, 3(1), 1-21.
Borras, I., & Lafayette, R. C. (1994). Effects of multimedia courseware subtitling on the speaking performance of college students of French. The Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 61-75.
Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2004). Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: Auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science, 32, 115-132.
Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 5(2), 624-645.
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. w., & Kinshuk (2006). Adaptive language learning based on learner''s STM ability in m-learning environment. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT''06), Kerkrade, Netherlands.
Chen, N. S., Hsieh, S. W., & Kinshuk (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 93-113.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
Chung, J. M. (1999). The effects of using video texts supported with advance organizers and captions on Chinese college students'' listening comprehension: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 295-308.
Chung, K. K. H. (2008). What effect do mixed sensory mode instructional formats have on both novice and experienced learners of Chinese characters? Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 96-108.
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315-324.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooney, G., & Keogh, K. A. (2007). Use of mobile phones for language learning and assessment for learning, a pilot project. Paper presented at the mLearn 2007, Melbourne.
Cooper, G. (1998). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. Retrieved July 13, 2008 from http://paedpsych.jku.at:4711/
LEHRTEXTE/Cooper98.html
Danan, M. (2004). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta: Translators'' Journal, 49(1), 67-77.
DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223-234.
Diao, Y., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2007). The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language. American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 237-261.
Diao, Y., & Sweller, J. (2007). Redundancy in foreign language reading comprehension instruction: Concurrent written and spoken presentations. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 78-88.
Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206-220.
Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: an overlooked dimension in language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 173-180.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.
Garza, T. J. (1991). Evaluation the use of captioned video materials in advanced foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 239-258.
Geddes, S. J. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefit for learners. Knowledge Tree e-journal, 30(3), 214-228.
Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325-331.
Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners'' listening comprehension problems. System 28(1), 55-75.
Grgurović, M., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: Students'' use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 45-66.
Griffiths, R. (1992). Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385-390.
Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36, 85–93.
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Hawkings, R. (2004). Learning with digital technologies in museums, science centres and galleries. Futurelab series, Report 9. Retrieved October 3, 2008 from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit_reviews/Museums_Galleries_Review.pdf
Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924-936.
Hernandez, S. S. (2004). The effects of video and captioned text and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities on second language listening comprehension in a multimedia learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University, New York.
Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 109-132.
Hsi, S. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 308-319.
Huang, H., & Eskey, D. (2000). The effects of closed-captioned television on the listening comprehension of intermediate English as a second language students. Educational Technology Systems, 28(1), 75-96.
Huk, T., & Ludwigs, S. (2009). Combining cognitive and affective support in order to promote learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 495-505.
Hung, H. C., & Young, S. C. (2007). Constructing the game-based learning environment on handheld devices to facilitate English vocabulary building. Paper presented at the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Niigata, Japan.
Jamet, E., & Bohec, O. L. (2007). The effect of redundant text in multimedia instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 588-598.
Jones, C., Berry, L., & Stevens, C. (2007). Synthesized speech intelligibility and persuasion: Speech rate and non-native listeners. Computer Speech and Language, 21, 641-651.
Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors, 40(1), 1-17.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351-371.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126-136.
Kao, C. C. (2006). EFL listening comprehension strategies used by students at the southern Taiwan university of technology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota, South Dakota.
Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE''02). Vaxjo, Sweden.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157-165.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). Can mobile devices support collaborative practice in speaking and listening? EuroCALL Virtual Strand. Retrieved July 13, 2008 from http://vsportal2007.googlepages.com/collaborativepractice
Leahy, W., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(4), 401-418.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2005). Interactions among the imagination, expertise reversal, and element interactivity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology :Applied, 11(4), 266-276.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp.147-158). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Markham, P. (1999). Captioned videotapes and second-language listening word recognition. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 321-328.
Mayer, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319-334.
Nash, S. S. (2007). Mobile learning, cognitive architecture and the study of literature. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology (IISIT), 4, 811-818.
Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 95-106.
Nunan, D. (2003). Listening in second language. The Language Teacher, 7. Retrieved August 28, 2008 from http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/articles/2003/07/
nunan
O''Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., & Lefrere, P. (2003). MOBIlearn WP4 - Guidelines for Learning/Teaching/Tutoring in a Mobile Environment. Retrieved August 10, 2008, from http://www.mobilearn.org/
download/results/guidelines.pdf
Osada, N. (2004). Listening comprehension research: A brief review of the past thirty years. Dialogue, 3, 53-66.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, D. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. ETR&D, 53(25-34).
Paas, F., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351.
Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual Motor and Skills, 79(1), 419-430.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short term verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 17, 398-422.
Perry, D. (2003). Hand-held computers (PDAs) in schools. Coventry, UK: Becta. Retrieved March 12, 2010 from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?
resID=25833
Purpura, J. E. (1998). Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high- and low-ability test takers: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 15 (3), 333–379.
Rost, M. (1994). Introducing listening. London, England : Penguin.
Rost, M. (2005). L2 listening. In E. Hinkel (Eds.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (p.506). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Saran, M., Cagiltay, K., & Seferoglu, G. (2008). Use of mobile phones in language learning: Developing effective instructional materials. Paper presented at the 5th IEEE International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education, Beijing, China.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508.
Shin, S. K. (2005). Did they take the same test? Examinee language proficiency and the structure of language tests. Language Testing, 22(1), 31-57.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the Move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.
Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.
Sung, Y. T. (2000). The effect of prior knowledge, text structure, and multimedia presentations on text learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Sweller, J. (1993). Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organization and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 1-8.
Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp.19-29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Sweller, J. (2007). Keynote address: Cognitive load. Paper presented at the Symposium on Cognitive Load: Theory and Applications. Fo Guang University, Yilan, Taiwan.
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instructional Science, 12(3), 185-233.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217–228
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3(4), 257-287.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177.
Vanderplank, R. (1988). The value of teletext sub-titles in language learning. ELT Journal, 42(4), 272-281.
Yang, J. C., Lai, C. H., & Chu, Y. M. (2005). Integrating speech technologies into a one-on-one digital English classroom. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2005), Tokushima, Japan.
Yao, Y. (2006). The effect of different presentation formats of hypertext annotations on cognitive load learning and learner control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Florida.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE