1.Ahuja, G. 2000a. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425-455.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
2.Ahuja, G. 2000b. The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 317-343.
3.Almeida, P. 1996. Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter special issue): 155-165.
4.Amabile, T. A. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
5.Anderson, J. C. 1987. An approach for confirmatory measurement and structural equation modeling of organizational properties. Management Science, 33 (4): 525-541.
6.Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3): 411-423.
7.Argote, L., & Ingram, P. 2000. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage for firms. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82 (1): 150-169.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
8.Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3): 396-402.
9.Association of Industries in Science Parks (AISP) 2009. Science park business directory (HSP & CTSP & STSP). Hsinchu, Taiwan: AISP.
10.Bagozzi, R. P., & Philips, L. W. 1982. Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 459-489.
11.Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. 1988. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (1): 74-94.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
12.Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administration Science Quarterly, 36: 421-458.
13.Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. 1997. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (6): 1369-1397.
14.Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
15.Basberg, B. L. 1987. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 16: 131-141.
16.Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biothechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 267-294.
17.Beckman, C. M., & Haunschild, P. R. 2002. Network learning: The effects of partners' heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (1): 92-124.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
18.Bekkers, R., Duysters, G., & Verspagen, B. 2002. Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM. Research Policy, 31 (7): 1141-1161.
19.Bell, G. G. 2005. Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3): 287-295.
20.Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A. 2007. Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18 (6): 955-972.
21.Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238-246.
22.Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. C. 1980. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88 (3): 588-606.
23.Bonacich, P. 1987. Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92 (5): 1170-1182.
24.Bonner, J. M., & Waler Jr., O. C. 2004. Selecting influential business-to-business customers in new product development: Relational embeddedness and knowledge heterogeneity considerations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (3): 155-169.
25.Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. 2002. Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (4): 437-469.
26.Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49 (4): 432-445.
27.Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
28.Boschma, R. A., & Terwal, A. L. J. 2007. Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the south of Italy. Industry and Innovation, 14 (2): 177-199.
29.Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
30.Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2): 339-365.
31.Burt, R. S. 2007. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1): 119-148.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
32.Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M., & Michaud, C. 2000. The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11 (2): 123-147.
33.Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.Chen, M.-H., & Wang, M.-C. 2008. Social networks and a new venture's innovative capability: The role of trust within entrepreneurial teams. R&D Management, 38 (3): 253-264.
35.Chen, S., Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Lehaney, B. 2006. Toward understanding inter-organizational knowledge transfer needs in SMEs: Insight from a UK investigation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10 (3): 6-23.
36.Christopher, M., & Gaudenzi, B. 2009. Exploiting knowledge across networks through reputation management. Industrial Marketing Management, 38 (2): 191-197.
37.Chu, W.-W. 2009. Can Taiwan’s second movers upgrade via branding? Research Policy, 38: 1054-1065.
38.Cohen, W. 1995. Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change: 182-198. England, Oxford: Blackwell.
39.Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of lndustrial Organization: 1059-1107. New York: North-Holland.
40.Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128-152.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
41.Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
42.Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46 (6): 740-751.
43.Collinson, S., & Gregson, G. 2003. Knowledge networks for new technology-based firms: An international comparison of local entrepreneurship promotion. R&D Management, 33 (2): 189-208.
44.Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. 2009. Knowledge portfolios and the organization of innovation networks. Academy of Management Journal, 34 (2): 320-342.
45.Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. 2003. Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20 (1-2): 39-68.
46.Cyert, R., & March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
47.D’Adderio, L. 2003. Configuring software, reconfiguring, memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12 (2): 321-350.
48.Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. 2002. Alliance constellations: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27 (3): 445-456
49.de Carolis, D. M., Litzky, B. E., & Eddleston, K. A. 2009. Why networks enhance the progress of new venture creation: The influence of social capital and cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (2): 527-545.
50.Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
51.Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
52.Dodgson, M. 1993. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies, 14 (3): 375-394.
53.Dodgson, M., Mathews, J., Kastelle, T., & Hu, M.-C. 2008. The evolving nature of Taiwan's national innovation system: The case of biotechnology innovation networks. Research Policy, 37 (3): 430-445.
54.Edelman, L. F., Brush, C. G., & Manolova, T. 2005. Co-alignment in the resource-performance relationship: Strategy as mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 359-383.
55.Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4): 532-550.
56.Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (special issue): 1105-1121.
57.Feinberg, S. E., & Majumdar, S. K. 2001. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 421-437.
58.Fiet, J. O. 1996. The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery. Small Business Economics, 8: 419-430.
59.Fiet, J. O. 2008. Prescriptive entrepreneurship. Boston, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
60.Fiet, J. O., & Patel, P. C. 2008. Entrepreneurial discovery as constrained, systemic search. Small Business Economics, 30 (3): 215-229.
61.Fiet, J. O., Jr. Norton, W. I., & Clouse, V. G. H. 2007. Systematic search as a source of technical innovation: An empirical test. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24 (4): 329-346.
62.Fiol, M. C. 1995. Thought worlds colliding: The role of contradiction in corporate innovation processes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19: 71-91.
63.Fleming, L., King III, C., & Juda, A. I. 2007. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18 (6): 938-954.
64.Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18: 39-51.
65.Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1: 215-239.
66.Freeman, L. C. 1997. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40 (1): 35-41.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
67.Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. 2000. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 113-137.
68.Gomes-Casseres, B., Hagedoorn, J., & Jaffe, A. B. 2006. Do alliances promote knowledge flows? Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 5-33.
69.Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6): 1360-1380.
70.Granovetter, M. S. 1983. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1: 201-233.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
71.Grant, R. M. 1996. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7 (4): 375-387.
72.Gulati, R. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 293-317.
73.Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.
74.Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. 1999. Where do inter-organizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5): 1439-1493.
75.Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C. 2003. Which ties mater when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 127-144.
76.Gulati, R., Dialdin, D. A., & Wang, L. 2002. Organizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Eds.), The blackwell companion to organizations: 281-303. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
77.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
78.Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.
79.Hansen, M. T. 2002. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13 (3): 232-248.
80.Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Lovas, B. 2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5): 776-793.
81.Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (4): 716-749.
82.Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1996. Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. Rand Journal of Economics, 27: 32-59.
83.Hite, J. M. 2005. Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (1): 113-144.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
84.Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. 2003. Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (2): 165-187.
85.Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1): 88-115.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
86.Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. 2005. Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science, 16 (4): 359-371.
87.Jack, S. L. 2010. Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (1): 120-137.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
88.Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Majchrzak, A. 2008. Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19 (2): 260-276.
89.Katila, R. 2002. New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5): 995-1010.
90.Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6): 1183-1194.
91.Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. 2003. Social networks and organizations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
92.Kilduff, M., Tsai, W., & Hanke, R. 2006. A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 1031-1048.
93.Kirzner, I. M. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60-85.
94.Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20 (2): 403-437.
95.Kogut, B. 2000. The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3): 405-425.
96.Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3 (3): 383-397.
97.Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 2008. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (6): 639-661.
98.Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. 2002. Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23 (9): 795-816.
99.Kraatz, M. S. 1998. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6): 621-643.
100.Kratzer, J., Gemunden, H. G., & Lettl, C. 2008. Balancing creativity and time efficiency in multi-team R&D projects: The alignment of formal and informal networks. R&D Management, 38 (5): 538-549.
101.Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1): 55-67.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
102.Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76-104.
103.Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., Cousins, P. D., & Handfield, R. B. 2009. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26: 156-172.
104.Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. 2007. The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 667-694.
105.Lechner, C., Frankenberger, K., & Floyd, S. W. 2010. Task contingencies in the curvilinear relationships between intergroup networks and initiative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (4): 865-889.
106.Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6/7): 615-640.
107.Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
108.Lin, B.-W., Li, P.-C., & Chen, J.-S. 2006. Social capital, capabilities, and entrepreneurial strategies: A study of Taiwanese high-tech new ventures. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (2): 168-181.
109.Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46 (4): 393-405.
110.Lorentzen, A. 2008. Knowledge networks in local and global space. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20 (6): 533-545.
111.March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2 (1): 71-87.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
112.Mathews, J. A., & Cho, D.-S. 2000. Tiger technology: The creation of as semiconductor industry in East Asia. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
113.McFadyen, M. A., & Jr. Cannella, A. A. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (5): 735-746.
114.Mello, A. S., & Ruckes, M. E. 2006. Team composition. Journal of Business, 79 (3): 1019-1039.
115.Meyer-Dohm, P. 1992. Human resources 2020: Structures of the “learning company. Conference Proceedings, Human Resources in Europe at the Dawn of the 21st Century. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
116.Miller, D. J., Fern, M. J., & Cardinal, L. B. 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2): 308-326.
117.Mishra, D. P., Heide, J. B., & Cort, S. G. 1998. Information asymmetry and levels of agency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 35 (3): 277-295.
118.Murphy, G., Trailer, J., & Hill, R. 1996. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research, 36: 15-23.
119.Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. 2005. Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26 (3): 415-441.
120.Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242-266.
121.Nerkar, A., & Paruchuri, S. 2005. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51 (5): 771-785.
122.Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5 (1): 14-37.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
123.Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning by interaction: Absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 4: 69-92.
124.Nooteboom, B. 2005. Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: An analysis of multimedia and biotechnology. European Management Review, 2: 179-197.
125.Nooteboom, B., van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36 (7): 1016-1034.
126.Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
127.Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. 2004. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 860-875.
128.Orsenigo, L., Pammolli, F., & Riccaboni, M. 2001. Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30 (3): 485-508.
129.Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15 (1): 5-21.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
130.Patel, P. C., & Fiet, J. O. 2009. Systematic search and its relationship to firm founding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (2): 501-526.
131.Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 369-388.
132.Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. 2002. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8): 707-725.
133.Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
134.Powell, W. W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganization collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
135.Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. 2007. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 479-516.
136.Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. 2003. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2): 240-267.
137.Reed, R., & DeFillippi, R. J. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15: 88-102.
138.Rodan, S. 2002. Innovation and heterogeneous knowledge in managerial contact networks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (2): 152-163.
139.Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. 2004. More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562.
140.Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (4): 287-306.
141.Salman, N., & Saives, A.-L., 2005. Indirect networks: An intangible resource for biotechnology innovation. R&D Management, 35 (2): 203-215.
142.Sammarra, A., & Biggiero, L. 2008. Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (4): 800-829.
143.Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Organization Science, 11: 448-469.
144.Shipilov, A. V. 2009. Firm scope experience, historic multimarket contact with partners, centrality, and the relationship between structural holes and performance. Organization Science, 20 (1): 85-106.
145.Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. 2008. Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53 (1): 73-108.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
146.Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. 2006. When exploration backfires: Unintendend consequences o fmultilevel organizational search. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (4): 779-795.
147.Simonin, B. L. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (7): 595-623.
148.Singh, J. 2005. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51 (5): 756-770.
149.Sinkula, J. M., Baker, W. E., & Noordewier, T. 1997. A framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 25: 305-318.
150.Soda, G., Usai, A., & Zaheer, A. 2004. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 893-906.
151.Soh, P.-H. 2003. The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 18: 727-744.
152.Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., & Kraimer, M. L. 2001. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 316-325.
153.Spencer, J. W. 2003. Firms’ knowledge-sharing strategies in the global innovation system: Empirical evidence from the flat panel display industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (3): 217-233.
154.Spender, J.-C., & Grant, R. M. 1996. Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Winter special issue): 5-9.
155.Stam, W., & Elfring, T. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (1): 97-111.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
156.Steensma, K., & Corley, K. 2000. On the performance of technology-sourcing partnerships: The interaction between partner interdependence and technology attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 1045-1067.
157.Stewart, A. M., Mullarkey, G. W., & Craig, J. L. 2003. Innovation or multiple copies of the same lottery ticket: The effect of widely shared knowledge on organizational adaptability. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11 (3): 25-44.
158.Stuart, T. E. 1998. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 668-698.
159.Stuart, T. E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a hightechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.
160.Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21-38.
161.Tiwana, A. 2008. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 251-272.
162.Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5): 996-1004.
163.Tsai, W. 2002. Social structure of coopetition within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganization knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13 (2): 179-190.
164.Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4): 464-476.
165.Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61 (4): 674-698.
166.Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. 1997. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8: 109-125.
167.Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 57-91.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
168.Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
169.Watson, J. 2007. Modeling the relationship between networking and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (6): 852-874.
170.Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., Ortqvist, D., & Autio, E. 2010. Quality meets structure: Generalized reciprocity and firm-level advantage in strategic networks. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (4): 597-624.
171.Winter, S. G. 1987. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In Teece, D. (Eds.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal: 159-184. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
172.Witt, P. 2004. Entrepreneurs' networks and the success of start-ups. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16 (5): 391-412.
173.Wu, F., & Cavusgil, T. 2006. Organizational learning, commitment, and joint value creation in interfirm relationships. Journal of Business Research, 59: 81-89.
174.Wu, L.-Y., Wang, C.-J., Chen, C.-P., & Pan, L.-Y. 2008. Internal resources, external network, and competitiveness during the growth stage: A study of Taiwanese high-tech ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (3): 529-549.
175.Wuyts, S., Colombo, M. G., Dutta, S., & Nooteboom, B. 2005. Empirical tests of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58 (2): 277-302.
176.Yang, C.-H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J.-R. 2009. Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Evidence from Taiwan. Research Policy, 38 (1): 77-85.![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
177.Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 6, 587–613.
178.Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (9): 809-825.
179.Zheng, Y., Liu, J., & George, G. 2010. The dynamic impact of innovative capability and inter-firm network on firm valuation: A longitudinal study of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (6): 593-609.