:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台灣主被併企業價值分解模型之實證研究
作者:陳盈棋
作者(外文):Ying-Chi Chen
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
指導教授:古永嘉
梁世安
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2011
主題關鍵詞:市價對帳面值被併公司主併公司併購活動TargetAcquirermerger activitymarket-to-book
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究參考學者Rhodes-Kropf and Viswanathan (2005)以及Shleifer and Vishny (2005)所發展的企業價值分解法,來檢視台灣併購活動(merger activity)中,是否存在較低成長機會價值的主併公司(acquirer)會併購較高成長機會價值的被併公司(target)。本研究以1997~ 2009年間公開發行的115組主被併公司為研究對象,將主被併公司之市價對帳面值之價差,分解為三個成份: 企業特性誤差、產業特性誤差及成長機會誤差。研究設計採用三種迴歸模式,分別納入歲稅後純益及負債比率的控制變數。將樣本分為純股票及混合交易兩組進行次樣本驗證。在軔度測試中,再將樣本依併購金額之四分位數分為四組次樣本,進行再驗證。
實證結果顯示,台灣併購活動中無論是全體樣本、純股票或混合交易、或依併購金額分組,皆可發現主併公司之成長機會誤差(價值)皆小於被併公司之成長機會誤差(價值),代表主併公司為尋求長期競爭優勢,會併購具未來成長機會的公司,以維持企業競爭力。
To test valuation errors affect merger activity, we base on 115 published merger companys from year 1997 to 2009 and refer to Rhodes-Kropf and Viswanathan (2005); Shleifer and Vishny (2005) develop a decomposition that breaks the market-to-book ratio (M/B) into three components: the firm-specific pricing deviation from short-run industry pricing; sector-wide, short-run deviations from firms’ long-run pricing; and long-run pricing to book.
We find strong support for recent theories by which predict that misvaluation drives mergers. So much of the behavior of M/B is driven by firm-specific deviations from short-run industry pricing, that long-run components of M/B run counter to the conventional wisdom: Low long-run value to book firms buy high long-run value-to-book firms. Misvaluation affects who buys whom, as well as method of paymen to explain aggregate merger activity.
參考文獻

一、中文部份
王淑芬(2006),企業評價,台北市,華泰文化事業股份有限公司,頁274-284。
孫梅瑞、陳隆麒(1999),國內上市公司從事公司併購活動對經營績效影響之研究,中山管理評論,10(1),頁155-184。new window

二、英文部份
Andrade, G. and Stafford, E. (2004), "Investigating the Economic Role of Mergers, " Journal of Corporate Finance 10(1): 1–36.
Black, Fisher and Scholes, Myron (1973), "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities, " Journal of Political Economy 81 (3): 637–654.
Copeland, Koller and Murrin (1994), Valuation: Measuring and Mamnaging The Value of Companies, New York, Wiley.
Donal, M. D. (2001), Mergers, Acquisions, and Other Restructuring Activities, College of Business Administration, Loyola Marymount University, LA, California.
Dong, M., Hirshleifer, D., Richardson, S. and Teoh, S. H. (2006), "Does Investor Misvaluation Drive the Takeover Market? " The Journal of Finance, 61(2): 725-762
Estañol, H., Nitsche and Seldeslacht (2006). Merger Clusters During Economic Booms, City University Economics Discussion Papers 06/07, Department of Economics, City University, London.
Fairfield, P.M., (1994). " P/B, P/E and the Present Value of Futher Dividents, " Financial Analysts Journal, 50: 23-11.
Feltham, G. and Ohlson, J. (1999). Residual Earnings Valuation With Risk and Stochastic Rates, The Accounting Review, 74(2): 165-183.
Francis, J. and Schipper, K. (1999). "Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance? " Journal of Accounting Research 37(2): 319–352.
Gort, M. (1969). "An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers, " Quarterly Journal of Economics 83: 624–642.
Gorton, G., Kahl, M. and Rosen, R. (2000), Eat or be eaten: a Theory of Mergers and Merger Waves, Unpublished working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Harford, J. (2005), "What drives merger waves, " Journal of Financial Economics, 77(3): 529-560
Hietala, P., Kaplan, S. N, and Robinson, D. T. (2003), "What is the Price of Hubris? Using Takeover Battles to Infer Overpayments and Synergies, " Financial Management 32(3):1–32.
Holmstrom, B., and S. N. Kaplan (2001), "Corporate governance and merger activity in the United States: Making sense of the 1980s and 1990s", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2): 121-144
Jensen, M. (1986), Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review 76(2): 323–329.
Jovanovic, B. and Rousseau, P. (2001), Mergers and technological change: 1885–2001. Unpublished working paper, New York University, New York.
Jovanovic, B. and Rousseau, P. (2002), The q-theory of mergers, American
Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 92 (2): 198–204.
Lambrecht, Bart M. and Myers, S. C., (2005), A Theory of Takeovers and Disinvestment. NBER Working Papers 11082, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Mitchell, M. L. and Mulherin, J. H. (1996), "The Impact of Industry Shocks on Takeover and Restructuring Activity, " Journal of Financial Economics 41(2): 193–229.
Moeller, S., Schlingemann, F., Stulz, R. (2004), " Firm size and gains from acquisition, " Journal of Financial Economics 73(2): 201–228.
Moeller, S., Schlingemann, F., Stulz, R. (2005). "Wealth destruction on a massive scale? An Analysis of Acquiring Firm Returns During The Recent Merger Wave," Journal of Finance 60(2): 757–782.
Mulherin, H. and Boone, A. (2000). "Comparing Acquisitions and Divestitures," Journal of Corporate Finance 6 (2): 117–139.
Ohlson, J. (1995), Earning, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation: An Empirical Pespective, New York University.
Penman, S. (1998). Combining earnings and book value in equity valuation,
Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (3): 291–324.
Rhodes–Kropf, M. and Robinson, D. T. (2005). The market for mergers and the boundaries of the firm, Unpublished working paper, Columbia University and Duke University, New York, and Durham, North Carolina.
Rhodes-Kropf, M. and Viswanathan, S. (2005), "Market valuation and merger waves, " Journal of Finance 59(6): 2685–2718.
Servaes, H. (1991), "Tobin's q and the gains from takeovers," Journal of Finance 46 (1): 409–419.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (2005). "Stock market driven acquisitions," Journal of Financial Economics 70(3): 295–311.
Smit, H. T.J., Van den Berg, W. A. and Maeseneire, W. D. (2005). Acquisitions as a Real Options Bidding Game, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-084/2, Tinbergen Institute.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE