|
Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception. Berkeley, CA: University of Califonia Press. Arnheim, R. (1985). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. In S. Koch & D. E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp.856-865). New York: McGraw-Hill. Baltissen, R., & Ostermann, B. M. (1998). Are the dimensions underlying aesthetic and affective judgement the same? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 97-113. Beaton, A. (1985). Left side, right side. New Haven: Yale University Press. Berlyne, D. E. (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17, 274-290. Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279-286. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward and objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Berlyne, D. E. & Ogilvie, J. C. (1974). Dimensions of perceptions of paintings. In D. E. Berlyne (Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. New York: Hemisphere. Wiley. Bornstein, R. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265-289. Boyatzis, C., & Eades, J. (1999). Gender differences in preschoolers’ and kindergartners’ artistic production and preference. Sex Roles, 41(7-8), 627-638. Calkins, M. (1990). An attempted experiment in psychological aesthetics. Psychological Review, 7(6), 580-591. Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum. Chen, C. & I, B. (2002). Psychology and arts education. In R. Huang (Ed.) education of arts and humanity (pp. 155-168). Taipei: Laureate Book. Chao, H. (2005). A study of the response toward visual images among children and adolescent in Taiwan. Research in Arts Education, 9, 33-70. Chen, C. (2000). How children and adolescents talk about art: Children and adolescents’ conceptions in designing, preferring, and judging works of arts. Taipei: San Min Book. Comrey, A. L. & Lee, H. B. (1992). A course in factor analysis. Hillsalde, New Jersey; Erlbaum. Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2001). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 23(1), 113-118. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313-335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Robinson, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: An interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Malibu, Calif.: J.P. Getty Museum. Cupchik. G. C. (1986). A decade after Berlyne: New direction in experimental aesthetics. Poetics, 15, 345-369. Cupchik, G. C. (1992). From perception to production: a multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In G.C. Cupchik & J. Laszlo (Eds), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp.61-81). New York: Cambridge University Press. Cupchik, G. C., & Berlyne, D. E. (1979). The perception of collative properties in visual stimuli. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 93-104. Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8(1), 1-14. Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1992). Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Cupchik, G. C., & Gignac, A. (2007). Finding meaning and expressing emotion in response to artworks, Visual Arts Research, 33(1), 56-71. Cureton, F. E. & D’Agostino, R. B. (1983). Factor Analysis: A Applied Approach. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Minton, Balch. Dewey, J. (1934). Arts as Experience. New York: Minton, Blach. Diana, D. S. (2006). Exploratory or Confirmatory Factor Analysis? Statistics and Data Analysis 31, 200-231 Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Anchor Books. Everitt, B. S. (1975). Multivariate analysis: the need for data and other problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 237-240. Fechner, G. T. (1871). Vorschule der Ästhetik [Elements of Aesthetics]. ildesheim: Olms. Feinburg, S. G. (1979). The significance of what boys and girls choose to draw: Explorations of fighting and helping. In J. Loeb (Ed.), Feminist collage: Educating women in the visual arts (pp. 185-195). New York: Teachers College Press. Feldman, D. H. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Field, A. (2000). Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. London – Thousnad Oaks – New Delhi: Sage publications. Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29-51. Flynn, J.R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin,101, 171-191. Funch, B. S. (1997). The psychology of art appreciation. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. Gardner, H. (1981). Children’s perceptions of works of art: a developmental portrait. In D. O’Hare (Ed.), Psycholoy and the arts (pp. 123-147). Brighton: The Harvester Press. Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., Paus, T., Evans, A. C., Rapoport, J. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescent: A longitudinal MRI study. Natural Neuroscience 2, 861-863. Giedd, N. J., Snell, J. W., Lange, N., Rajapakse, J. C., Casey, B. J., Kozuch, P. L., Vaituzis, A. C., Vauss, Y. C., Hamburger, S. D., Kaysen, D., & Rapoport, J. L. (1996). Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hipponcampus in normal human development: Ages 4-18 years. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 366, 223-230. Gogtay, N.; Giedd, J. N.; Lusk, L.; Hayashi, K. M.; Greenstein, D.; Vaituzis, A. C.; Nugent, T. F. III; Herman, D. H.; Clasen, L. S.; Toga, L. S.; Rapoport, A. W., & Thompson, J. L. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101(21), 8174-8179. Gorsuch, R. L, (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Eelbaum. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw Hill. Habingm B. (2003). Exploratory factor analysis. Website: http://www.stat.sc.edu/~habing/courses/530EFA.pdf (accessed 10 May 2004). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Hargreaves, D. J., & Galton, M. J. (1992). Aesthetic learning: Psychological theory and educational practice. In B. Reimer & R. A. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education and aesthetic knowing (pp. 124-150). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. Hekkert, P., & van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483-495. Holbrook, M. B., & Zirlin, R. B. (1985). Artistic creation, artworks, and aesthetic appreciation: Some philosophical contributions to nonprofit marketing. Advances in Nonprofit Marketing, 1, 1-54. Housen, A. (1983). The eye of the bachelor: Measuring aesthetic development. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Housen, A. (1992). Validating a measure of aesthetic development for museums and schools. ILVS Review, 2, 213-237. Hsu, H. (2000). The development of representational strategies in children’s and adolescents’ expressive drawings. Journal of National Hualien Teachers College, 10, 337-358. Hutcheson, G. D. & Sofroniou, N. (1999).The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. I, B. (2008). Empirical Aesthetics of illustration and TV commercials. Taipei: Airiti Press. I, B., Lin, Y., & Chang, W. (2006). Aesthetic judgment and preference for popular images to adolescents in Taiwan. Communication Research Newsletter, 45, 10-13. Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Yasumasa, A. (2001). Sex differences in children’s free drawings. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 99-104. Jacobsen, T. (2002). Kandinsky’s questionnaire revisited: Fundamental correspondence of basic color and form. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 903-913. Kawecki, I. (1994). Gender differences in young children’s artwork. British Educational Research Journal, 20(4), 485-490. Kemp S. W. G., & Cupchik, G. C. (2007). The emotionally evocative effects of paintings. Visual Arts Research, 33, 72-82. Kinder, A., Shanks, D. R., Cock, J., & Tunney, R. J. (2003). Recollection, fluency, and the explicit/implicit distinction in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 551-565. King, R., Meganathan, J., Nagahara, J., & Boscolo, M. (1998). Individual differences in complexity preference and artistic style: neoclassical versus expressionistic aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16, 15-23. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the art. Durham: Duke University Press. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1984). Meaning assignment in perception. In W. D. Frohlich, G. J. W. Smith, J. G. Dragung & U. Henschel (Eds.), Psychological processes in cognition and personality (pp. 173-190). New York: Hemisphere /McGraw-Hill. Krupinski E, & Locher P. (1988). Skin conductance and aesthetic evaluative responses to nonrepresentational works of art varying in symmetry. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 355-358 Kubovy, M. (2000). Visual aesthetics. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, 8 (pp. 188-193). New York: Oxford University Press. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558. Leder, H. (2002). Explorationen in der Bildästhetik [Explorations in Visual Aesthetics]. Lengerich: Pabst. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508. Locher P. J., & Nodine, C. F. (1987). Symmetry catches the eye. In J.K. O’Regan & A. Lévy-Scjoen (Eds). Eye movements: from physiology to cognition (pp. 353-361). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Locher, P., & Nagy, Y. (1996). Vision spontaneously establishes the percept of pictorial balance. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 17-31. Locher, P. J. (2003). An empirical investigation of the visual rightmess theory of picture perception. Acta Psychologica, 114, 147-164. Lin, Y. & I, B. (2011) (in press). Generation and gender differences in aesthetic responses to popular illustration. Visual Arts Research, 37(1). Lin, S. F., & Thomas, G. V. (2002). Development of understanding of popular graphic art: A study of everyday aesthetics in children, adolescents, and young adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(3), 278-287. McGuinness, D. (1976). Sex differences in the organization of perception and cognition. In B. Lloyd & J. Archer (Eds.), Exploring sex differences (pp. 25-47). London: Academic Press. MacCallum, R. C. & Widaman K. F. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99. Majewski, M. M. (1979). Female art characteristics: Do they really exist? In J. Loeb (Ed.), Feminist collage: Educating women in the visual arts (pp. 197-201). New York: Teachers College Press. Martindale, C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 49-80. Martindale, C. (1996). A note on the relationship between prototypicality and preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14, 109-113. Martindale, C., & Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661-670. Martindale, C., Moore, K., & Borkum, J. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne’s psychological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 53-80. Martindale, C., Moore, K., & West, A. (1988). Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 79-96. May, R. (1975). The course to create. New York: W. W. Norton. Mead, A. M., & McLaughlin, J. P. (1992). The roles of handedness and stimuli asymmetry in aesthetic preference. Brain and Cognition,20, 300-307. Messinger. S. (1998). Pleasure and complexity: Brelyne revisited. The journal of Psychology, 132, 558-560. McLaughlin, J. P., Dean, P., & Stanley, P. (1983). Aesthetic preference in dextrals and sinistrals. Neuropsychologia, 21, 147-153. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: A Signet Book. Millis, K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320-329. Mingroni, M. A. (2004). The secular rise in IQ: Giving heterosis a closer look, Intelligence, 32, 65-83. Moles, A. (1968). Information theory and aesthetic perception. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Neperud, R., & Marschalek, D. G. (1988). Informational and affect bases of aesthetic response, Leonardo, 21(3), 305-312. Nicki, R. M., & Moss, V. (1975). Preference for non-representational art as a function of measures of complexity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 237-249. Nicki, R. M., Lee, P. L., & Moss, V. (1981). Ambiguity, cubist works of art, and preference. Acta Psychologica, 49, 27-41. Osborne, H. (1988). Some theories of aesthetic judgment. In G. Hardiman & T. Zernich (Eds.), Discerning art: Concepts and issues (pp. 281-294). Illinois: University of Illinois Press. (Original work published in 1979) Osborne, J. W., & Farley, F. H. (1970). The relationship between aesthetic preference and visual complexity in abstract art. Psychonomic science 19, 69-70. Parsons, M. (1987). How we understand art. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1952) Polzella, D. J., Hammar, S. H., & Hinkle, C. W. (2005). The effect of color on viewer’s ratings of paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23(2), 153-163. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(6-7), 15-51. Read, H. (1972). The meaning of art. London: Faber & Faber. Russell, P. A. (2003). Effort after meaning and the hedonic value of paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 99-110. Russell, P. A., & George, D. A. (1990). Relationship between aesthetic response scales applied to paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 15-30. Saklofske, D. W. (1975). Visual aesthetic complexity, attractiveness and diversive exploration. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 41, 813-814. Salkind, L., & Salkind, N. J. (1997). Gender and age differences in preference for works of art. Studies in Art Education, 38(4), 246-256. Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters: What parents and teachers need to know about the emerging science of sex differences. New York: Doubleday. Simon, R. M. (1992). The symbolism of style: Art of theory. London: Routledge. Strauch, B. (2003). The primal teen. New York: Anchor Books. Smith, L.F. & Smith, J. K. (2006). The nature and growth of aesthetic fluency. In P. Locher, C. Martindale, & L. Dorfman (Eds.), New direction in aesthetic, creativity, and the arts (pp. 47-58). New York: Baywood. Temme, J. E. (1992). Amount and kind of information in museums: Its effect on visitors satisfaction and appreciation of art. Visual Art Research, 18(2), 74-81. Tuman, D. (1999). Sing a song of sixpence: An examination of sex differences in the subject preference of children’s drawings. Visual Arts Research, 25, 51-62. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Pscychological Review, 84, 327-350. Van Meel-Jansen, A. (2006). The magic number five in art appreciation. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 24(1), 107-118. Veryzer, R. W. J. (1993). Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 224-228. Vitz, P. C. (1966). Preference for different amounts of visual complexity. Behavioral Science, 11, 105-114. Walsh, D. (2005). Why do they act that way? New York: Free Press. Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1-14. Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge: Havard University Press. Wohlwill, J. (1968). Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 4(5), 307-312. Wölfflin, H. (1950). Principle of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art (M. D. Hottinger, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1915). Woods, W. A. (1991). Parameters of aesthetic objects: Applied aesthetics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9(2), 105-114. Worringer, W. (1953). Abstraction and empathy: A contribution to the psychology of the style (M. Bullock, Trans). New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1908). Wundt, W. (1999). Principles of physiological psychology. (B. T. Edward, Trans.). Beijing: China Social Sciences Publishing House. (Original work published 1874) Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
|