:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:輔助英語閱讀與聽力之適性化行動學習系統發展與評估
作者:許靜坤 引用關係
作者(外文):Ching-kun Hsu
校院名稱:國立臺南大學
系所名稱:數位學習科技學系博士班
指導教授:張智凱
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:閱讀註記個別學習合作學習適性學習字幕行動學習專家系統collaborative learningindividual learningexpert systemreading annotationcaptionadaptive learningmobile learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
本論文開發及評估了兩套行動學習系統,以適性化輔助學生改善英語閱讀理解和英語聽力訓練。在閱讀方面,本論文所提出的適性化行動輔助閱讀學習系統包含個人及合作閱讀註記功能,以及閱讀教材推薦功能,然後經由3個階段的測試。第一,在沒有提供閱讀教材推薦功能的情況下,學生閱讀統一的教材,實驗探討學生使用PDA分享閱讀教材並進行外語字彙註記共享成果,結果發現2、3、4人異質小組的合作閱讀理解程度顯著優於個人閱讀。第二,反之在沒有提供閱讀註記功能的情況下,測試本論文採用專家系統方法所開發的英語閱讀推薦功能,經比對推薦結果確定推薦正確率達到九成以上,而且實驗發現學生擁有適性化閱讀教材時有較佳的學習動機。第三,本論文測試結合行動閱讀註記功能與閱讀教材推薦功能,在此機制下變成只有具有相似喜好與閱讀理解程度的同質性學生,才會被系統指派到閱讀同一篇文章。有同一篇閱讀教材的學生始能合作閱讀,本論文比較了適性化行動個別閱讀、非適性化行動個別閱讀、與適性之同質小組合作閱讀之理解成效,發現適性化行動個別與合作閱讀理解皆表現優於非適性化行動個別閱讀,而且認知負荷減輕。以上三個階段的閱讀試驗,都有進行科技接受模式問卷調查。在聽力方面,本研究為了事先確認臺灣學生看影片時對於字幕的依賴程度,因此使用眼動儀分析學生觀看影片期間注視的焦點,結果發現超過七成的學生習慣將注意力放在字幕。本研究對字幕進行難度分級過濾處理,藉由留下較難或學習目標須學習的單字、隱藏容易的字彙,來提供學生適性的聽力訓練環境,研究發現隱藏部份字幕的聽力理解程度可達到和全字幕一樣,省略的字彙則讓學習者於訊息處理時沒有文字輸入,無法依賴眼睛讀取單字,促進學生接收與練習適應所熟識字彙的連音、省略音或重音等等;反之,顯示不熟稔的單字來讓學生眼睛讀取,可幫助學生辨認所聽到的是哪一個英語字,以免因為許多不同英語字彙發音相近,而造成聽者混淆,進而影響聽力理解。由於人類短暫記憶體之限制,因此本論文統計了過濾後字幕少於等於5、7、9個字彙之百分比,發現影片樣本有超過98%使用2200常用字過濾後,剩下字數不會超過短暫記憶限制。最後,本論文實驗來比較全班統一字幕過濾程度和個別適性字幕之可用性、使用滿意度、愉悅性和學習動機,發現兩者可用性相近,但是使用個別適性字幕的學習滿意度和愉悅性顯著較高,內在學習動機也較高。總結,本論文提出整合行動閱讀註記功能和閱讀教材推薦功能之適性化行動輔助閱讀學習系統,以及藉由分級字幕過濾發展適性化行動輔助聽力學習系統,帶給學生個人化以及隨時隨地的學習機會。
The dissertation developed and evaluated two mobile learning systems. One was used to support English reading. The other one was utilized to assist English listening. In terms of reading, the dissertation proposed a mobile learning system for adaptively assisting English reading. The system integrates the individual or collaborative reading annotation function with the reading material recommendation mechanism. Three experimental stages were conducted to evaluate the effects on individual reading and collaborative reading. Firstly, students read identical reading materials without reading recommendation mechanism in the experiment. They were assisted by the instant and shared reading annotation function. The experimental results indicated that those students who were heterogeneously grouped into twos, threes, and fours had significantly higher levels of reading comprehension than individual students, but those grouped into fives did not. Secondly, the dissertation evaluated the reading material recommendation function which was developed by an expert system method. In the experiment, the students read the material recommended by the system without using the reading annotation function. The accuracy of recommendation results is higher than ninety percent. The experimental results found the students had higher learning motivation when the students read adaptive reading materials. Thirdly, the dissertation assessed the integration of the mobile-assisted reading annotation function with the reading material recommendation mechanism. Only the students who had similar preferences and reading comprehension proficiency were recommended the same reading materials. The students should have the same reading materials when doing collaborative reading. Therefore, the collaborative group is homogeneous. The dissertation compared the reading comprehension of individual reading adaptively and non-adaptively with the reading comprehension of homogeneously collaborative reading. The experimental results showed that mobile-assisted individual or collaborative English reading adaptively had better reading comprehension and lower cognitive loads in comparison with the reading comprehension and cognitive loads of the non-adaptively individual reading. As for English listening, the dissertation confirmed the captions dependence of Taiwanese students by using eye-movement tracking machine to analyze the fixation targets of eyes when the students watched movies. The experimental results noted that more than seventy percent of the students are used to gaze and put their attention on captions. The dissertation processed the video captions by filtering and hiding the easier words but showing the harder words to carry out adaptive English listening learning on mobile devices. In addition, the experimental results found that the listening comprehension of the students using partial hidden captions was similar to the listening comprehension of the students using full captions. The hidden words avoid the students inputting information through reading text from eyes. The perception processing of ears becomes important so as to adapt the students to the features of reduced forms, assimilation, elision, and so on. On the contrary, unfamiliar vocabulary which was shown in the video captions so as to be read by the eyes of the students would assist students to recognizing the vocabulary they heard and prevent the students from confusing the vocabulary they heard with other words having similar pronunciation. Due to the limitation of human working memory, the dissertation calculated the percentage of the sentences which were filtered and had the left words fewer than or equal to 5, 7, 9 words. The test results of the 30 video samples showed that more than ninety-eight percent of sentences did not surpass the limitation of working memory after filtering the highest frequently used 2200 words from captions. Finally, the dissertation conducted an experiment to compare the effects of the identical caption-filtering and personalized caption-filtering on system usability, perceived satisfaction, enjoyment, and learning motivations. The experimental results indicated that the students had higher enjoyment and satisfaction with the personalized captions when watching videos to train English listening, resulting in higher intrinsic learning motivations. In conclusion, the dissertation proposed the integration of mobile-assisted reading annotation function with the reading material recommendation mechanism to adaptively assist students reading on mobile devices, and implemented a personalized mobile-assisted English listening learning system by an adaptive caption-filtering approach. The effects of the two mobile learning systems were also discussed in the dissertation.
Abdous, M., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(01), 76-95.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision sciences, , 30(2), 361-391.
Antonio, B., Soledad, B., & Carlos, C. (2007). JGOMAS: A new approach to AI teaching. IEEE Transactions on Education, 1–8.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication: Oxford University Press.
Brown, A. L., & Smiley, S. S. (1978). The development of strategies for studying texts. Child Development, 49(4), 1076-1088.
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Casamayor, A., Amandi, A., & Campo, M. (2009). Intelligent assistance for teachers in collaborative e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1147-1154.
Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m Learning: An experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 78-91.
Chai, J., & Erlam, R. (2008). The Effect and the Influence of the Use of Video and Captions on Second Language Learning. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 25.
Chang, C.-K. & Hsu, C.-K. (2011). A Mobile-assisted Synchronously Collaborative Translation-Annotation System for EFL Reading Comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning: an International Journal, 24(2), 155-180.
Chang, W. C. V. (2006). English Language Education in Taiwan: A Comprehensive Survey. Bimonthly Journal of Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129-144.
Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System, 28(3), 419-433.
Chen, J.-M., Chen, M.-C., & Sun, Y.-S. (2010). A novel approach for enhancing student reading comprehension and assisting teacher assessment of literacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1367-1382.
Chen, N. S., & Lee, Y. H. (2000). Group composition methods for cooperative learning in web-based instructional system. Paper presented at the ICCE/ICCAI 2000.
Chi, C. C., Kuo, C. H., & Peng, C. C. (2007). The Designing of a Web Page Recommendation System for ESL.
Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
Chu, C. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2826-2840.
Chung, J. M. (1996). The effects of using advance organizers and captions to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 14(1), 61-65.
Cowan, N. (1998). Attention and memory: An integrated framework: Oxford University Press, USA.
Cuseo, J. (1992). Cooperative learning vs. small-group discussions and group projects: The critical differences. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 2(3), 5–10.
Danan, M. (2004). Captioning and subtitling: Undervalued language learning strategies. Meta: Journal des traducteurs, 49(1), 67-77.
Danan, M. (2010). Dubbing projects for the language learner: a framework for integrating audiovisual translation into task-based instruction. Computer assisted language learning, 23(5), 441-456.
Davidson, N. (1994). Cooperative and collaborative learning: An integrative perspective. Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers, 13-30.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. J. (2001). What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer? Applied linguistics, 22(3), 324-337.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365.
Dror, I. E. (2007). Land minus and gold mines in cognitive technologies. In I. E. Dror (Ed.), Cognitive technologies and the pragmatics of cognition (pp. 1-7): Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dror, I. E., & Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognitioon onto cognotive technology. In I. E. Dror & S. Harnad (Eds.), Distributed cognition: How cognitive technology extends our minds (pp. 1-23): Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Durkin, J. (1994). Expert Systems- Design and Development: Macmillan Coll Div.
Fasting, R., & Lyster, H. (2005). The effects of computer technology in assisting the development of literacy in young struggling readers and spellers. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(1), 21-40.
Field, J. (2003). Promoting perception: lexical segmentation in second language listening. ELT Journal, 57, 325-334.
Fransella F, Bell R, Bannister D. (2004). A Manual for Repertory Grid Technique. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gagné, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little Brown.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Garza, T. J. (1991). Evaluating the use of captioned video materials in advanced foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 239-258.
Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (2000). The effects of cooperative learning on students with learning difficulties in the lower elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 19.
Glover, I., Xu, Z., & Hardaker, G. (2007). Online annotation-Research and practices. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1308-1320.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2012). Emerging technologies digital video revisited: storytelling, conferencing, remixing. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 1-9
Grgurovi, M., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Help options and multimedia listening: students’ use of subtitles and the transcript. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 45-66.
Guillory, H. G. (1998). The effects of keyword captions to authentic French video on learner comprehension. Calico Journal, 15, 89-108.
Harri-Augstein, E. S., & Thomas, L. F. (2005). The Kelly Repertory Grid as a vehicle for eliciting a personal taxonomy of purposes for reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 1(1), 53-66.
Harris, A. J., & Sipay, E. R. (1985). How to increase reading ability: A guide to developmental and remedial methods. (8th ed.). New York: Longman.
Hayati, A., & Mohmedi, F. (2011). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 181-192.
Hilke, E. V. (1990). Cooperative learning (2th ed.). Bloomington, Indiana: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Hsu, C.-K., & Chang, C.-K. (2010). Effects of Automatic Hidden Caption Classification on a Content-based Computer-Assisted Language Learning System for Foreign Language Listening. Paper presented at the ICCE2010, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Hsu, C.-K., Chang, C.-K., & Hwang, G.-J. (2009). Development of a Reading Material Recommendation System based on a Multi-Expert Knowledge Acquisition Approach. Paper presented at the ICALT 2009, Riga, Latvia.
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2010). Development of a reading material recommendation system based on a knowledge engineering approach. Computers & Education, 55, 76-83.
Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., Chang, Y.-T., & Chang, C.-K. (Impress). Effects of Video Caption Modes on English Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition Using Handheld Devices. Educational Technology & Society.
Hsu, J. (1994). Computer assisted language learning (CALL): The effect of ESL students’ use of interactional modifications on listening comprehension. Doctoral dissertation, College of Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Hsu, L (2012): English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study, Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI:10.1080/09588221.2011.649485
Hsu, M. H. (2008). A personalized English learning recommender system for EFLs. Expert systems with applications, 34(1), 683-688.
Huang, H., Chern, C., & Lin, C. (2009). EFL learners'' use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13-26.
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning 16, 413-425.
Hwang, G. J., Tseng, J. C. R., & Hwang, G. H. (2008). Diagnosing Student Learning Problems Based on Historical Assessment Records. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 77-89.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C., & Stephen Yang, J. H. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Computers & Education, 53(2), 402-413.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students'' reading comprehension. System, 38(1), 96-108.
Janzen, J., & Stoller, F. (1998). Integrating strategic reading in L2 instruction. Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(2), 251-269.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1998). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey: Merrill, Prentice Hall, Inc.
Juffs, A. (2011). Second language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(3), 277-286.
Kadyte, V. (2004). Learning can happen anywhere: A mobile system for language learning. In J. Attwell & C. Savill-Smith (Eds.), Learning with mobile devices. London: Learning and skills development agency.
Kellerman, S. (1990). Lip service: The contribution of the visual modality to speech perception and its relevance to the teaching and testing of foreign language listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 272-280.
Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 135-149.
Kiernan, P. J., & Aizawa, K. (2004). Cell phones in task based learning-Are cell phones useful language learning tools? ReCALL, 16(01), 71-84.
Klausmeier, H. J., Rossmiller, R. A., & Saily, M. (Eds.). (1977). Individually Guided Elementary Education: Concepts and Practices. New York: Academic Press.
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Arguelles, M. E., Hughes, M. T., & Leftwich, S. A. (2004). Collaborative Strategic Reading:" Real-World" Lessons From Classroom Teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 12.
Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N. (2012). Mobile Assisted Language Learning in university EFL courses in Japan: developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24(02), 169-187.
Koolstra, C. M., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (1999). Children''s vocabulary acquisition in a foreign language through watching subtitled television programs at home. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 51-60.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271-289.
Lan, Y.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2007). A mobile-device-supported peer-assisted learning system for collaborative early EFL reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 130-151.
Latifi, M., Mobalegh, A., & Mohammadi, E. (2011). Movie subtitles and the improvement of listening comprehension ability: Does it help? The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning (JLTL), 1(2), 18-29.
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: Words you don''t know, words you think you know, and words you can''t guess. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 20-34). New York: Cambridge University. .
Laufer, B., & Hill, M. (2000). What lexical information do L2 learners select in a CALL dictionary and how does it affect word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 3(2), 58-76.
Leitich, H., Kiener, H. P., Kolarz, G., Schuh, C., Graninger, W., & Adlassnig, K. P. (2001). A prospective evaluation of the medical consultation system CADIAG-II/RHEUMA in a rheumatological outpatient clinic. Methods Inform Med, 40(3), 213-220.
Leloup, J. W., & Ponterio, R. (2005). Vocabulary Support for Independent Online Reading. Language, Learning & Technology, 9(2), 3-8.
Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57-78.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2003). An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 751-765.
Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2006). Information retrieval from the World Wide Web: a user-focused approach based on individual experience with search engines. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 501-517.
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & G.D., C. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.
Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International journal of human-computer interaction, 7(1), 57-78.
Lin, Z. (2002). Discovering EFL learners’ perception of prior knowledge and its roles in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2), 172-190.
Liu, C. C., & Lee, J. H. (2005). Prompting conceptual understanding with computer-mediated peer discourse and knowledge acquisition techniques. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 821-837.
Liu, H.-C., & Chuang, H.-H. (2011). An examination of cognitive processing of multimedia information based on viewers'' eye movements. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(5), 503-517.
Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A Look at the Research on Computer-Based Technology Use in Second Language Learning: A Review of the Literature from 1990-2000. Journal of research on technology in education, 34(3), 250-273.
Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2009). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students'' English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2), 436-445.
Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer-assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: An evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 333-348.
Makany, T., Kemp, J., & Dror, I. E. (2009). Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive and for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 619-635.
Markham, P. L., Peter, L., & McCarthy, T. J. (2001). The effects of native language vs. target language captions on foreign language students’ DVD video comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 439-445.
Markham, P. L., Peter, L. A., & McCarthy, T. J. (2001). The effects of native language vs. target language captions on foreign language students'' DVD video comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 34(5), 439-445.
Matthew Lee, K.O., Christy Cheung, M.K.& Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42, 1095-1104
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
Milrad, M., Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile Learning: Small Devices, Big Issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products. Berlin: Springer.
Miranda-Mena, T. G., Bentez U, S. L., Ochoa, J. L., R., M.-B., Fernandez-Breis, J. T., & Salinas, J. (2006). A knowledge-based approach to assign breast cancer treatments in oncology units. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 451-457.
Mitterer, H., & McQueen, J. M. (2009). Foreign Subtitles Help but Native-Language Subtitles Harm Foreign Speech Perception.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students'' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology, 94(2), 249.
Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990). Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology, 81(2), 111-121.
Nah, K. C., White, P., & Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using a mobile phone to access the Internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. ReCALL, 20(03), 331-347.
Noels, K. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic extrinsic, and integrative orientations and motivations. In Z. Do‥ rnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 43-68). The University of Hawai, Second Language & Curriculum Center.
Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, M. K. (2000). Evaluation of a computer-based reading intervention in infant and junior schools. Journal of Research in Reading, 23(2), 194-209.
Norris, C., Hossain, A., & Soloway,, E. (2011). Using Smartphones as Essential Tools for Learning- A Call to Place Schools on the Right Side of the 21st Century. Educational Technology & Society, May-June, 18-25.
Obendorf, H. (2003). Simplifying annotation support for real-world-settings: a comparative study of active reading.
Ogata, H., Saito, N. A., Paredes, J. R. G., San Martin, G. A., & Yano, Y. (2008). Supporting classroom activities with the BSUL system. System, 11(1), 1-16.
Osuna, M. M., & Meskill, C. (1998). Using the World Wide Web to integrate Spanish language and culture: A pilot study. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 71-92.
Ou, H. C. (1996). The effectiveness of teaching English listening comprehension as a second or foreign language learning: New York: Longman.
Ozcelik, E., & Yildirim, S. (2005). FACTORS INFLUENCING THE USE OF COGNITIVE TOOLS IN WEB-BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(4), 295-307.
Paas, F. R. A. S., J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
Parker, R. E. (1985). Small-Group Cooperative Learning--Improving Academic, Social Gains in the Classroom. Nassp Bulletin, 69(479), 48-57.
Peng, H. Y., Chuang, P. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wu, T. T., & Huang, S. X. (2009). Ubiquitous performance-support system as Mindtool: A case study of instructional decision making and learning assistant. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 107-120.
Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners'' online dictionary use and its effect on L2 word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 36-58.
Phinney, M. (1996). Exploring the Virtual World: Computers in the Second Language Writing Classroom. In M. C. Pennington (Ed.), The power of CALL (pp. 137-152). Houston: Athelstan.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Inc. A Simon & Schuster Company.
Quade, A. M. (1996). An Assessment of Retention and Depth of Processing Associated with Notetaking Using Traditional Pencil and Paper and an On-line Notepad during Computer-Delivered Instruction. Paper presented at the Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 18th, Indianapolis, IN.
Reategui, E., Boff, E., & Campbell , J. A. (2008). Personalization in an interactive learning environment through a virtual character. Computers & Education, 51(2), 530-544.
Robinson, J. P. (2008). Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 141.
Roever, C., & Pan, Y. C. (2008). Test review: GEPT: General English Proficiency Test. Language Testing, 25(3), 403.
Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., & Winograd, T. (1997). Shared Web Annotations as a Platform for Third-Party Value-Added, Information Providers: Architecture, Protocols, and Usage Examples: Citeseer.
Segler, T. M., Pain, H., & Sorace, A. (2002). Second language vocabulary acquisition and learning strategies in ICALL environments. Computer assisted language learning, 15(4), 409-422.
Seo, K. (2002). The effect of visuals on listening comprehension: A study of Japanese learners'' listening strategies. International journal of listening, 15, 57–81.
Sharan, S., & Shaulov, A. (1990). Cooperative learning, motivation to learn, and academic achievement. Cooperative learning: Theory and research, 173-202.
Shih, S. P., Lee, F. M. & Chang, Y. F. . (2007). The research of utilizing technology assistance in English teaching and learning - A case study of students of applied foreign language department in far east university. Paper presented at the International Conference on Applied Linguistics and Foreign language Instruction.
Singer, M. H., & Crouse, J. (1981). The relationship of context-use skills to reading: A case for an alternative experimental logic. Child Development, 52(4), 1326-1329.
Slavin, R. E. (1985). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. New York: Plenum.
Smidt, E., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer assisted language learning, 17(5), 517-556.
Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL, 20(03), 290-314.
Stephen Yang, J. H., Zhang, J., & Chen, I. Y. L. (2008). A JESS-enabled context elicitation system for providing context-aware Web services. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2254-2266.
Stepp-Greany, J. (2002). Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium. Language, Learning & Technology, 6(1).
Stewart, M. A., & Pertusa, I. (2004). Gains to language learners from viewing target language closed-captioned films. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 438-442.
Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(03), 253-270.
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-297.
Tang, T. Y., & McCalla, G. (2005). Smart Recommendation for an Evolving E-Learning System: Architecture and Experiment. International Journal on E-Learning, 4(1), 105-129.
Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217-228.
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., Demetriadis, S., & Georgiadou, E. (2004). The value of adaptivity based on cognitive style: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 95-106.
Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Students’ use of web-based concept map testing and strategies for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 72-84.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(03), 191-210.
Vanderplank, R. (2010). Déjà vu? A decade of research on language laboratories, television and video in language learning. Language Teaching, 43(01), 1-37.
Virvou, M., & Alepis, E. (2005). Mobile educational features in authoring tools for personalized tutoring. Computers & Education, 44, 53-68.
Wang, K., & Liu, H. (2011). Language Acquisition with the Help of Captions. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 41-45.
Wang, Q. (2009). Design and evaluation of a collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1138-1146.
Waring, R., & Nation, P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental vocabulary learning. Writing and Vocabulary in Foreign Language Acquisition, 4, 97.
Williams, H., & Thorne, D. (2000). The value of teletext subtitling as a medium for language learning. System, 28(2), 217-228.
Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010). The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65-86.
Wu, Y. C. (2004). The Effects of Repeated Reading and Text Difficulty on Fifth Grade Reading Performance. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 35(4), 319-336.
Yang, F., Han, P., Shen, R., & Hu, Z. (2005). A Novel Resource Recommendation System Based on Connecting to Similar E-Learners. Advances in Web-Based Learning 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3583, 122-130.
Yang, J. C., Huang, Y. T., Tsai, C. C., Chung, C. I., & Wu, Y. C. (2009). An automatic multimedia content summarization system for video recommendation. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 49-61.
Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y. J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 860-879.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and Self-regulated Learning: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 267-295). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top