教學模式與創業自我效能對創業能力與創業態度影響之研究_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	教學模式與創業自我效能對創業能力與創業態度影響之研究
作者：	黃文谷
作者(外文)：	Huang, Wen-Guu
校院名稱：	國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：	科技應用與人力資源發展學系
指導教授：	侯世光
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2011
主題關鍵詞：	教學方法；自我效能；創業能力；創業態度；instructional mode；self efficacy；entrepreneurial capability；entrepreneurial attitude
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:40

隨著創業型經濟的興起，創業管理議題逐漸受到台灣學術界與實務界的注意。基於鼓勵創業的重要性，近年來，國內愈來愈多的大專院校開始開辦創業相關課程，然而，在創業課程如雨後春筍般的發展之際，國內創業課程的設計與實施卻還是處於萌芽階段。因此，本研究旨在釐清不同創業教學方法對學生創業能力與創業態度之影響。研究採用「準實驗設計」（quasi-experiment design）方法，將三個班級各賦與不同的教學方法，包含傳統講述、個案教學以及模擬教學。三種不同教學方式之班級皆以教授創業計畫書撰寫為主，並以問卷調查方式進行前後測測驗，了解課程開始前與結束後學生創業能力與創業態度的轉變情形。
傳統講述課程進行方式是由教師主導全部教學活動的內容與進行，將其認為重要的知識與觀念以系統化與結構化的方式，灌輸予學生；個案教學以六家企業創辦人自身案例為主，藉由學員本身作為個案中的人物或面對個案中的情況時，應採取哪些決策或如何調整其行為作為主軸；模擬教學則以賽局理論為基礎，透過創業學習工具之操作，運用每回競賽結果數字做決策情報，找出創業問題點並對症下藥。
研究結果發現，三種教學方法（傳統講述、個案教學與模擬教學）均對於學生的學習成效產生正向的影響，其中，創業模擬成效較佳。另外，不同教學方式與創業自我效能在創業態度上有顯著的交互作用。研究亦發現，在教學歷程中，如要提升學生創業基礎能力，採取模擬教學對學生的學習成效最有幫助，且學習效果亦顯著優於個案教學；反之如要提升學生創業進階能力時，個案教學對學生的學習成效最有幫助，且學習效果亦顯著優於傳統講授法。
其次，過去研究顯示創業自我效能是影響學習成效的主要因素。然而，本研究發現，教學方法與創業自我效能在創業能力的表現上，其交互作用並無顯著的差異性。結果顯示，在創業領域方面，或許自我相信的信念程度多寡，對於能力的展現沒有等值之效果，此為研究之另ㄧ項重要的發現與具體的貢獻。
最後，藉由研究結果的呈現，本研究提出四項具體建議：
1.加強推廣校園創業模擬課程或競賽活動
2.落實開課前學生自我效能之調查
3.針對不同創業能力的養成，設計不同教學方法
4.運用研究發現於政府辦理之各項創業訓練課程

以文找文

With the rise of the entrepreneurial economy, entrepreneurial management has gradually attracted attention from the academia and industry in Taiwan. In view of the importance of encouraging entrepreneurship, more and more universities or colleges have started to open the relative courses on entrepreneurship recently. However, while the entrepreneurship courses have mushroomed, the design and implementation of the domestic entrepreneurship are still in its infancy. Therefore, this study aims to clarify the influences of different instruction modes on students’ entrepreneurial capability and attitude. This study employs quasi-experiment design for the three classes to be instructed by different modes covering traditional lecturing, case teaching and simulation teaching. These three classes are all taught how to write business plans , and then by way of questionnaire for pre-tests and post-tests in order to realize the changes of students’ entrepreneurial capability and attitude before and after taking the course.
Traditional lecturing is conducted totally by the teacher for the content of the course and all the important knowledge and concepts are taught to the students systematically and structurally. As to case teaching, six entrepreneurs’ cases are taken for the students to play the case characters and adopt what decisions or adjust what behaviors in face of certain conditions of the cases. Simulation teaching is based on the game theory. Through the operation of the entrepreneurial learning tools (Chain Store Master), each time the final figure of the competition is used as the data for decision making so as to identify the entrepreneurial problems and offer the solutions.
The results of the study find that three instructional modes (that is, traditional lecturing, case teaching and simulation teaching) have positive influences on the learning effect of the students, while entrepreneurial simulation has preferable effect. In addition, different instructional modes have remarkable interaction on entrepreneurial self efficacy and entrepreneurial attitude. The study also finds that in the process of teaching, if the students are to enhance their basic entrepreneurial capability, simulation teaching is most helpful and much better than case teaching in the learning effect of the students. On the contrary, if the students are to enhance their advanced entrepreneurial capability, case teaching is most helpful and much better than traditional lecturing in the learning effect of the students.
Secondly, previous studies indicated that entrepreneurial self efficacy is a major factor in learning effect. However, this study finds that there are no remarkable differences in the interaction among the instructional modes, entrepreneurial self efficacy and the performance of entrepreneurial capability. The results show that in the entrepreneurial field, the degree of self-confidence might not have the equivalent effect on the performance of the capability. This is another important finding and substantial contribution of the study.
At last, the study concludes the following four recommendations.
1.To enhance the promotion of entrepreneurial simulation courses or competitions in the campus.
2.To implement the investigation of students’ self efficacy before the start of the course.
3.In respect of the cultivation of different entrepreneurial capabilities, different instructional modes are designed.
4.To employ the study findings on the various entrepreneurial training courses held by the government.

以文找文

中文部分
王震武、林文瑛、林烘煜、張郁雯、陳學志（2005）。心理學。台北：學富。
俞文釗（1996）。管理心理學。台北：五南。
柯承恩（2009）。個案教學與知識建構。商管科技季刊，10（2），395-402。 new window

郁義鴻、李志能（2002）。創業管理。台北：五南。
徐光國（1996）。社會心理學。台北：五南。
陳瑜芬、賴銘娟（2007）。台灣創業課程現況之探究。創業管理研究，2（3），117-147。 new window

張春興（2002）。張氏心理學辭典。台北：東華。
張新仁、邱上真、張酒雄、方吉正、莊麗娟、簡妙娟（2003）。學習與教學新趨勢。台北：心理。
陳俊廷（2008）。個案教學之理論與推動實務。人事月刊，47（4），42-46。
陳書梅（2002）。知識創新與教育效能之提升。書苑季刊，51，65-71。
黃安邦（譯）（1986）。社會心理學（Sears, D. O., Freeman, J. L. &; Peplau L. A.）。台北：五南。
詹慧雯、林麗雪（2011）明新科技大學管理學院誰廣個案教學之研究，明新學報，37（1），207-216。 new window

趙平宜（2009）。教學與學習-從哈佛的個案與參與是學習方法談起。商管科技季刊，10（4），761-769。 new window

劉常勇（2002）。創業管理的十二堂課。臺北：天下遠見。 new window

蔡敦浩、張玉山、劉常勇（2007）。創業論壇：台灣創業教育與創業研究面臨的問題與挑戰。創業管理研究，2（3），149-172。 new window

賴銘娟（2004）。技職校院商管群學生創業態度及其影響因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立雲林科技大學，雲林市。
謝如梅（2009）。創業教育在國際上的發展現況與未來展望。創業管理研究，2（3），109-146。 new window

英文部分
Abad-Grau, M. M., &; Arias-Aranda, D. (2006). Operations strategy and flexibility: modeling with Bayesian classifiers. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(4), 460-484.
Ahmad, N., Ramayah, T., Wilson, C., &; Liz, K. (2010). Is entrepreneurial competency and business success relationship contingent upon business environment？A study of Malaysian SMEs, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &; Research, 16(3), 182-203
Ahmad, N. H., Halim, H. A., &; Zainal, S. R. M. (2010). Is Entrepreneurial Comptetency the Silver Buller for SME Success in a Developing？International Business Management, 4(2), 67-75
Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago：Dorsey Press.
Allport, G.W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
Arias-Aranda, D., &; Bustinza-Sánchez, O. (2009). Entrepreneurial Attitude and Conflict Management through Business Simulations. Industrial Management and Data System, 109(8), 1101-1117
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barbosa, S., Gerhardt, M., &; Kickul, J. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efﬁcacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership &; Organizational Studies, 13(4), 86–104.
Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., &; Smith, K.G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292-303.
Bird, B. (1995).Towards a theory of entrepreneurial competency, Advances in Entrepreneurship. Firm Emergence and Growth, 2, 51-72.
Boyd, N. G., &; Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory &; Practice, 63-77.
Brinckmann, J. (2007) Competence of top management teams and success of new technology based firms: a theoretical and empirical analysis concerning competencies of entrepreneurial teams and the development of their ventures, Wiesbaden: DUV.
Carter, K., &; Unklesbay, R. (1989). Casesin teaching and Law. Curricullum Studies, 21(6), 527-536.
Chandler, G. N., &; Jansen, E. (1992). The founder’s self-assessed competence and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(3), 223-36.
Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G., &; Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295-316.
Chrisman, J. J., &; Katrishen, F. (1994). The economic impact of small business development center counseling activities in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 271–280.
Chrisman, J. J., &; McMullan, W. E. (2000). A preliminary assessment of outsider assistance as a knowledge resource: the longer-term impact of new venture counseling. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(3), 39-53.
Co, M., &; Mitchell, B. (2006). Entrepreneurship education in South Africa: a nation wide survey. Education &;Training, 48(5), 348-59.
Cope, J., &; Watts, G. (2000). Learning by doing: an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reﬂection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &; Research, 6(3), 104-24.
Cox, L. W., Mueller, S. L., &; Moss, S.E. (2002). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(2), 229-245.
Curry, B. U., &; Moutinho, L. (1992). Using computer simulations in management education. Management Learning, 23(2), 155-67.
Desiraju, R., &; Gopinath, C. (2007). Encouraging participation in case discussion: A comparison of the MICA and the Harvard case method. Journal of Management Education, 25(4), 394-408.
Drnovsek, M., &; Glas, M. (2006). Women Entrepreneurs in Slovenia: by fits and starts. In Welter, F., Smallbone, D., and N. Isakova (eds.), Enterprising Women in Transition Economies. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., &; Pearson, D. (2000). The impact of entrepreneurship training programs on an individual’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson Conference Proceedings, retrieved from: www.babson.edu/entrep/fer
Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: a brief history. Simulation and Gaming, 32 (1), 97-110.
Fayolle, A. (2002). Les déterminants de l’acte entrepreneurial chez les étudiants et les jeunes diplômés de l’enseignement supérieur français. Revue Gestion 2000, 4, 61-77.
Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., &; Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Effect and Counter-effect of Entrepreneurship Education and Social Context on Student’s Intentions. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 24(2), 509-523
Fishbein, M., &; Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Forbes, D. P. (2005). The effects of strategic decision making on entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Sep, 599~626.
Fuchs, K., Werner, A., &; Wallau, F. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in Germany and Sweden: what role do different school systems play? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 365-381.
Galloway, L., Anderson, M., Brown, W., &; Wilson, L. (2005). Enterprise skills for the economy. Education &; Training, 47(1), 7-17.
Ghosh, B. C., &; Tan, W. L. (2001). The Key Success Factors, Distinctive Capabilities and Strategic Thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Business Research, 10(51), 209-221.
Greene, P. G., Katz, J. A., &; Johannisson, B. (2004). Introduction to special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(3), 238–241.
Griffiths, J. M., &; King, D. W. (1985). New directions in library and Information science education, Final report, New York: Knowledge Industry Publications.
Harris, M. L., &; Gibson, S. G. (2008). Examining the entrepreneurial attitudes of US business students. Education &; Training, 50(7), 568-581.
Harrison, R.T., &; Leitch, C. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial learning: researching the interface between learning and the entrepreneurial context. Entrepreneurship Theory &; Practice, 29(4), 351-72.
He, X. (2005). Evaluation on Capability of Enterprisers: a Method and Frame for Qualitative Research. Academic Journal Graduate School Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Henry, C., Hill, F., &; Leitch, C. (2005a). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education &; Training, 47(2), 98-111.
Henry, C., Hill, F., &; Leitch, C. (2005b). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part II. Education &; Training, 47(3), 158-69.
Hoy, W. K., &; Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational Administration:Theory, Research, and Practice, NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
Hui, S. K., Csete, J., &; Raftery, J. (2006). Factors involved in the success of Hong Kong construction and property entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &; Research, 12(4): 228-245.
Hytti, U., &; O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is Enterprise education? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. Education &; Training, 46(1), 11-23.
Jackson, S. E., &; Dutton, J. E. (1988). Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370-387.
Jiwa, S., Lavelle, D., &; Rose, A. (2005). E-entrepreneurship: learning in a simulated environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 3(3), 42-56.
Kaplan , J., &; Warren, A. (2007). Patterns of Entrepreneurship, New York : John Wiley.
Katz, J. A. (2007). Education and training in entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, &; R. A. Baron (Eds.). The psychology of entrepreneurship. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keys, J. B., &; Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307 -336.
Kirby, D. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge? EducationþTraining, 46(8/9), 510-19.
Knirk, F. G. (1991).Case Materials:Research and Practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(l), 73-81.
Knotts, U. S., &; Keys, B. J. (1997). Teaching strategic management with a business game. Simulation &; Gaming, 28, 377 -394.
Kolvereid, L., &; Moen, O. (1997). Entrepreneurship among business graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference? Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(4).
Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47-57.
Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21.
Krueger, N., &; Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: perceived self-ecacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25(3), 385-400.
Kundu, S. C., &; Rani, S. (2007). Personality and attitudes of Indian young female workforce: Entrepreneurial orientation by education and regions. Managing Global Transitions, 5(3), 229–252.
Kundu, S. C., &; Rani, S. (2008). Human resources’ entrepreneurial attitude orientation by gender and background: a study of Indian Air Force trainees. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 5(1), 77-101.
Kuratko, D. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (5), 577-598
Kuratko, D. F. (2003). Entrepreneurship Education: Emerging Trends and Challenges for the 21st Century. White Paper, U.S. Association of Small Business Education.
Kuratko, D. F., &; Hodgetts, R. M. (2004). Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, practice. Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishers.
Lainema, T., &; Makkonen, P. (2003). Applying constructivist approach to educational business games: Case real game. Simulation &; Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(1), 131-149.
Lane, D. C. (1995). On a resurgence of management simulations and games. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46 (5), 604-25.
Lang, C. (1986). Case Method Teaching in the Community Collage. MA: Education Development Center. Inc.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., &; Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79 -122.
Man, T., Lau, T., &; Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises. A conceptualisation with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (2), 123-42.
Man, T.W., &; Lau, T. (2000). Entrepreneurial competencies of small business owner/managers in the Hong Kong services sector: a qualitative analysis. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 8(3), 235-54.
Man, T. W. Y., &; Lau, T. (2005). The context of entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: An investigation through the patterns of entrepreneurial competencies in contrasting industrial environments. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 464-481.
Masurel, E., Montfort, K. V., &; Lentink, R. (2003). SME innovation and the crucial role of the entrepreneur. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit
Mead, M. (1939). From the South Seas: Studies of Adolescence and Sex in Primitive Societies, New York: Morrow Ltd.
Meeus, M. T. H., &; Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2000). Firm behaviour and innovative performance: an empirical exploration of the selection-adaptation debate. Research Policy, 29, 41-58
Miles, W. G., Biggs, W. D., &; Schubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation: a comparison. Simulation and Gaming, 17(1), 7-24.
Mitchell, R. C. (2004). Combining cases and computer simulations in strategic management courses. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 198-204.
Mitchelmore, S., &; Rowley, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: a literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &; Research, 16(2), 92-111
Moratis, L., Hoff, J., &; Reul, B. (2006). A dual challenge facing management education : simulation-based learning and learning about CSR. The Journal of Management Development, 25(3/4), 213.
Muzychenko, O., &; Saee, J. (2004). Cross cultural professional competence in higher education. Journal of Management Systems, 16 (4), 1-19.
Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education &; Training, 52(1), 20-47.
Parry, S. B. (2000). Training: The quest for competence. Grand Pacific : Management International Corp.
Posner, G. J., &; Rudnitsky, A. N.（2001）. Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman.
Priyanto, S. H. (2005). Relationship between entrepreneurial learning, entrepreneurial com- petencies, and venture success: empirical study of SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(5/6): 454- 468.
Rachman-Moore, D., &; Kenett, R. S. (2006). The use of simulation to improve the effectiveness of training in performance management. Journal of Management Education, 30 (3), 455-77.
Reitz, H. J. (1981). Behavior in Organizations, Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, Inc
Rice, M. P. ( 2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 163-187.
Robbins, S. P. (1991). Management, (3rd ed.), England Cliff：NJ：Prentice-Hall.
Robert, A. B., &; Rebecca A. H. (2010). How Entrepreneurs Acquire The Capacity to Excel: Insights From Research on Expert Performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal., 4, 49-65.
Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C., &; Hunt, H. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory &; Practice, 15(4), 13-31.
Rose, R. C., Kumar, N., &; Yen, L. L. (2006). The Dynamics of Entrepreneurs’ Success Factors in Influencing Venture Growth. The Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability. 2(2). 5-23.
Rulke, D. L., &; Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-25.
Saulo D. B., Kickul, J., &; Smith, B. R. (2008). The road less intended: integrating entrepreneurial cognition and risk in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16(4), 411-439.
Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2004). Pathways to successful entrepreneurship: Parenting, personality, entrepreneurial competence, and interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 498-518.
Scholten , V., Kemp R., &; Omta, O. (2004). Entrepreneurship for life: the entrepreneurial intention among academics in the life sciences, European Summer University Conference 2004, Enschede, 1-15.
Schwoerer, C. E., May, D. R., Hollensbe, E. C., &; Mencl, J. (2005). General and speciﬁc self-efﬁcacy in the context of a training intervention to enhance performance expectancy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 111-129.
Scott, M. G., &; Daniel, F. T. (1988). The long-term supply of entrepreneurs: students' career aspirations in relation to entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 26 (October), 37-44.
Shaver, K. G. (1987), Principles of Social Psychology, Winthorp, Cambridge: MA.
Shook, C. L., &; Bratianu, C. (2008). Entrepreneurial intent in a transitional economy: an application of the theory of planned behaviour to Romanian students. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1).
Shulman, J. (Ed.). (1992). Case studies for teacherproblem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Simon, M., Houghton, S., &; Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: how individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-34.
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., &; Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-91.
Stokes, D., &; Blackburn, R. (2002). Learning the hard way: the lessons of owner-managers who have closed their businesses. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 9(1), 17-27.
Swiercz, P., &; Spencer, B. (1992). HRM and sustainable competitive advantage: Lessons from delta air lines. Human Res. Plann., 15, 35-46.
Tannenbaum, S. I., &; Mathieu, J. E. (1991). Meeting trainees' expectations: The influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 759-769.
Thompson, A. A., &; Stappenbeck, G. J. (1997). The Business Strategy Game, Chicago: Irwin.
Timmons, J. A., &; Spinelli, S. (2004). New venture creation, 6th ed., Boston: McGraw Hill Inc.
Tkachev, A., &; Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among Russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 269-280.
Tompson, G. H., &; Dass, P. (2000). Improving students’ self-efficacy: The relative impact of case and simulations. Simulation &; Gaming, 31, 22-41.
United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (2010). Building Blocks for Competency Models. Retrieved from: http://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/Pyramid.aspx
Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., &; Wright, M. (2005). Experience and cognition: do novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? International Small Business Journal, 23(1), 72-98
Wood, R., &; Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
Zhao, F. (2005). Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour &; Research, 11(1), 25-41.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., &; Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	個案式教學法對學習者學習成效分析之研究
2.	社會研究方法課程導入個案教學法對於邏輯能力提昇之成效研究--以玄奘大學「傳播研究方法」課程為例
3.	「創新創業競賽」與「問題導向式學習」融入「行銷管理專題」課程教育成效之PDCAF行動研究
4.	導入「產學專案」之創新餐旅創業課程：學生學習與課程成效評估之研究
5.	融入競賽學習於設計創業人才培育歷程--以遠東科技大學學生創業團隊為例
6.	大學創業教育與創業意圖：情感與認知觀點
7.	創業課程接受模式：整合性探討課程易理解性、認知有用性和課程參與態度對創業意圖的影響
8.	以科技導向數位學習培育大學生餐飲業創業素養之研究
9.	提升三創類通識課程學習成效之教學歷程探討--以「生活創意發想與實作」為例
10.	參與式教學與公務人員跨域協調能力建構使力點之反思
11.	情境學習應用於行銷課程之教學方法研究--三創競賽獲獎方程式
12.	技專校院創業教育與學生創業能力之關聯性探究
13.	問題導向學習教學模式下學習動機對學習滿意度影響之研究--以弘光科技大學為例
14.	途中臺北國際青年旅舍：從背包客的旅行到創業的旅途
15.	家庭環境對創業意向與創業行為之影響：以兩岸創業家為例

1.	建構社會創業者核心能力評估模式之研究
2.	科技大學時尚造型相關科系學生人格特質、創業自我效能與創業意向之研究
3.	網路微型企業創業家創業能力培育之研究-以3C產業行銷為例
4.	探究台灣民宿創業中的身體知識：風格化知識的創造歷程
5.	科技大學學生個人背景變項、創業動機、創業自我效能與創業意向關係之研究
6.	創業家的失敗學習－經驗釋意與「韌力-學習」模型之建構
7.	冷凍空調維修服務業微型創業管理之創業環境、動態能力與創業績效關係研究
8.	創業認知觀點下的機會辨識過程：以創業警覺能力為中介變項
9.	台灣國際新創事業績效影響因素之研究－國際化、廠商優勢、市場進入策略與成長策略
10.	廠商能力建構基礎之實證研究--以台灣國際新創公司為例
11.	網絡關係對新創企業發展影響之研究－以台灣高科技公司為例

1.	案例教學在教育學院的應用與成效

無相關著作

1.	臺灣技專院校餐旅管理科系學生創造力人格、創業機會與創業態度之關聯性研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫