:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用情感喚醒原理之感性設計模式建構
作者:鄧 建國
作者(外文):Teng, Chien-Kuo
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用藝術研究所
指導教授:莊明振
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:情感設計情感喚醒創造力深度驚喜設計模式emotional designemotional arousalcreativitylater wowdesign model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
當代的產品重視情感面向,強調產品對人產生情感的聯繫作用,注重產品的愉悅感受,而發展出情感設計。然而,設計師要如何在設計時,以適當的產品語言來喚醒使用者的記憶,讓使用者更能感受到產品所傳達的情感,尚無較為明確的做法。再者,設計概念的發展,需要結合主動及被動的啟發,若能在設計的發想階段引進設計元素的發想刺激,將可激發設計創意,幫助設計者產生內在心理的感觸連結。
本研究基於情感設計與預設用途理論之相關探討,整合情境劇本的故事方法與心理喚醒之原理,提出造形聯想設計模式,以發展產品概念。本研究提出一設計模式,讓設計者能以預想使用者的產品經驗為導向,依擬定之設計步驟,產生更具情感效果的造形成果。此設計模式,係以「心理喚醒的情境脈絡」與「造形發想步驟」兩個向度,定義出「造形情感喚醒」之創作思考矩陣。其中,情感喚醒的情境脈絡,包含:1)傳達語言的建立、2)狀態差異的強化,及3)意象的連結等三種手法。造形發想步驟則包含:1)建立設計情境、2)設計特徵明確化、3)技術特質的應用、4)設計張力的強化等四個設計步驟。本研究具體陳述此模式的建構理論、執行方式與執行成果的驗證:首先,敘述相關的理論與此設計模式的使用原則及步驟。其次,藉由童話情境、科幻情境、現實情境等三種情境故事類型,發展出六件概念產品,來驗證其應用性也藉此呈現其所對應的產品想像,以及情感喚醒的操作過程與要點。設計者可彈性地運用矩陣的垂直軸與水平軸之技巧,較為周延地連結情感與造形,藉由外觀的變化效果,促成設計者、使用者與產品之情感聯繫。經驗證結果顯示,此模式的發展應用,有助於設計者的設計發想,較易獲得wow的驚喜設計效果。最後,本論文也將對執行之要點、應注意事項,提出檢討與建議。
Today’s products emphasize the aspect of emotion so that products have to be designed with the power of linking with human emotion. However, in design process, there is no clear approach of how to adopt appropriate design language that designers can follow to wake the users’ memory for perceiving the conveyed emotion in products. On the other hand, as the development of design concepts requires a combination of active and passive inspiration, if some inspiring stimuli for design elements can be introduced in the conceiving phase of design, they will stimulate designers’ creativity to develop designs with arousal link to users’ feelings.
Based on theories of emotional design and affordance, an emotional design model, which integrates approaches of scenario design emotional arousal, is proposed in this study. With referring to this design model, designers can consider the users experience of using products beforehand, then follow the design procedure of this model to develop product form with emotion arousing power. The core of this design model is an idea stimulating matrix with two dimensions of emotion arousal context and from developing process. The emotion arousal context includes: 1) design language establishment, situational difference contrasting, and image links. Whereas, the form developing process can be divided into four steps: 1) building design scenario, 2) clarifying design characteristics, 3) applying technology, and 4) strengthening tension of design. After the primitive has been built, the model was consecutively applied to six conceptual design cases for verifying the applicability of this model and for finding improvements to the model. In these design cases, three types of scenario: fairy tales, science-fiction and reality scenario have been adopted. It was found that, by using this design model, designers can flexibly manipulate the idea stimulating matrix to develop proper product form for connecting demanded emotions. In this way, this model helps to build the emotional connection among designer, users and the product. Likewise, it is easier to obtain product with the wow impression to their audience in conceptual design developed with this model. At last, suggestions and restrictions of applying this emotional design model were discussed and concluded.
外文期刊專書文獻
Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to design. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Battarbee, K. (2001). Design for user experience. Helsinki, University of Art and Design Helsinki UIAH.
Berlyne,D.(1960). Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw Hill.
Berlyne,D. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Carroll, J.M. (ed.) (1995). Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. Wiley, New York.
Demirbliek, O. &; Sener, B. (2003) Product design, semantics and emotional response, Ergonomics: Vol. 46, NOS N13/14, pp.1346-1360.
Desmet, P. (2007). Nine sources of product emotion. Proceedings of IASDR 07 [CD ROM]. Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design.
Desmet, P. &; Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1 (1), 57-66.
Desmet, P. (2008). Product Emotion. In: H. N. J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert (Eds). Product experience (pp. 379-397). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Desmet, P. (2010). Three Levels of Product Emotion. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KANSEI ENGINEERING AND EMOTION RESEARCH 2010. PARIS: KEER2010.
Fredrickson, B. &; Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172-175.
Hasdogan, G., (1996). The role of user models in product design for the assessment of user needs. Design Studies. 17, 19~33.
Jordan, P. W. (2000). Designing pleasurable products. London: Talyor &; Francis.
Joe, P., (1997). Scenarios as an essential tool; stories for success. Innovation Quar. J. Ind. Des. Soc. Am. 20~23.
Khaslavsky, J. &; Shedroff, N. (1999) Understanding the seductive experience, Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 45-49.
Krippendorff, K. (1996). On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the propositions that “Design is making sense (of Things )”. Design Issues, 4(2), 9-39.
Levy P. &; Yamanaka, T. (2008). Kansei tsudies description and mapping through kansei studies keywords, Proceeding of Emotion Research in Practice.International Symposium for Emotion and Sensibility 2008. [CD ROM] (pp. 209-214). Korea:KAIST.
Lidwell, W., &; Holden K., &; Butler J. (2008). Universal Principles of Design. Taipei: UN Books.
Lin, R. T. (2007). Transforming Taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: A case study of a cross-cultural product design model. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 45-53.
McDonagh, D., Bruseberg, A. &; Haslam, C. (2002). Visual product evaluation : exploring users’ emotional relationships with products. Applied Ergonomics, pp.231-240.
Moggridge, B. (1993). Design by story-telling. App. Ergon 24 (1), 15~18.
Myerson, J. (2001) IDEO:Master of Innovation. London: Laurence King Publishing.
Nardi, B.(1992). The use of scenarios in design. SIGCHI Bull. 24 (3), 13~14.
Norman, D. (1990). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Norman, D. (2005). Human-centered design considered harmful. ACM Digital Library magazine.
Nardi, B.(1992). The use of scenarios in design. SIGCHI Bull. 24 (3), 13~14.
Parrish, P.(2006). Design as Storytelling. TechTrends. Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 72-82.
Reisner, D.(1992). Further uses of scenario. SIGCHI Bull. 24 (3), 15.
Rabiger, M. (2006), Developing Story Ideas. USA: Focal Press.
Rowe, P. (1992). Design thinking (4th ed.). USA: The MIT Press.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
Stanton, N., Young, M. (1998). Ergonomics methods in consumer product design and evaluation. In: Stanton, N. (Ed.), Human Factors in Product Design. Taylor and Francis Ltd, UK, pp. 21~52.
Suri, F. &; Marsh, M.(2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied Ergonomics 31. 151~157.
Taylor, G. (2011). How to Draw and Paint Science Fiction Art. Singapore: Page One Publishing.
Teng, C. K. &; Chuang, M. C. (2007). The appraisal factors and evaluation of emotional design. Proceedings of IASDR 07 [CD ROM]. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design.
Teng, C. K. &; Chuang, M. C. (2008). The form arousal applied model of emotional design. Emotion Research in Practice, Proceedings of International Symposium for Emotion and Sensibility 2008 (pp. 215-219). Korea: KAIST.
Welker, K., Sanders, E. &; Couch, J. (1997). Design scenarios to understand the user. Innovation Quart. J. Ind. Des. Soc. Am. 24~27.
You, H. C. &; Chen, K. S. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Design Studies, 28.

中文期刊專書文獻
Bergstrom, B. (2011),視覺溝通的文法(Eeeentials of Visul Communication,陳芳誼譯)。台北市:原點出版。
Brown, T. (2010),設計思考改造世界(Change by Design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation, 吳莉君譯)。台北:聯經出版。
Cagan J. &; Vogel C. (2004),創造突破性產品:從產品企劃到企劃通過的創新之路(Creating breakthrough products: innovation from product planning to approval,蕭羨一譯)。台北市:中衛發展中心。
Ellen W. (1977),創造的世界-藝術心理學(Invented Worlds- The psychology of the art, 陶東風等譯)。台北市:田園城市文化。
Lidwell, W., Holden K., &; Butler J. (2008),設計的法則 (Universal Principles of Design,呂亨英譯)。台北市:原點出版。(原作2003年出版)
Lupton, E.(2012),圖解設計思考:好設計,原來是這樣想出來的!(Graphic Design Thinking: Beyond Braindstorming,林育如譯)。台北市:商周出版。
Mullen, B. &; Johnson, C.(1996),消費者行為心理學 (The Psychology of Consumer Behavior,游橫山譯)。台北市:五南出版。
Maurer, I.(2005). http://mocoloco.com/archives/001737.php;ingo-maurer.com.
Philip, N. (2003),睡美人:關於魔咒的12童話 (The Illustrated Book of Fairy Tales,周思芸譯)。台北市:天下遠見。(原作1997年出版)
Ramakers, R. &; Moors, A. (2008),就是droog 10+3年的創新與討論(Simplydroog,10+3years of creating innovation and discussion,李俊逸、呂奕欣 譯)。台北市:田園城市文化。
Rodgers, P. &; Milton, A.(2012),好設計!打動人心征服世界( Prouuct design,楊久穎譯)。新北市:謬思出版。
Underwood &; Shaughnessy(1989),心理學實驗研究法 (譯自:Experimentation in Psychology)。台北市:遠流出版。
Verganti, R. (2011),設計力創新(Design-Driven Innovation,呂奕欣譯)。台北市:馬可孛羅文化出版。(原作2009出版)
Zeisel, J.(1996),研究與設計 (Inquiry by Design-Tools for environment-behavior research,關華山譯)。台北市:田園城市文化(原作1984出版)。
林文寶等著(1998),認識童話。台北市:天衛文化。
林銘煌(2005),Alessi義大利設計精品的築夢工廠。台北市:桑格文化。
後藤武、佐佐木正人、深澤直人(2008),不為設計而設計就是最好的設計-生態學的設計論 (The Ecological Approach to Design,黃友玫譯)。台北市:漫遊者文化。(原作2004年出版)
原研哉、阿部雅世(2009),為什麼設計(蔡欣芸等譯)。台北市:木馬文化出版。(原作2007年出版)
游曉貞、陳國祥、邱上嘉(2006),直接知覺論在產品設計應用之審視。設計學報,11(3),13-27。
陳嵩季(2005),應用類型媒材激發創意的方法研究-以科幻電影為例。國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文。
張華閔、鄧怡莘(2004),產品設計與情緒研究初探。2004國際設計論壇暨第九屆中華民國設計學會設計學術研討會論文集(頁907-912),台北市:中華民國設計學會。
鄧建國、莊明振 (2008),應用情感喚醒的造形聯想設計模式探討。設計學報,13(3),81-98。
鄧建國 (2009),微建築的情感與功能挑戰:Tea &; Coffee Towers. ALESSI觀察。現代美術,145,58-67,台北:台北市立美術館。

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE