:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:現成物應用於產品設計的發展脈絡、手法與認知
作者:王靜儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Wang, Ching-Yi
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用藝術研究所
指導教授:林銘煌
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:現成物產品設計事件相關電位卡片分類紮根理論Ready-MadeProduct DesignEvent-Related Potentials (ERPs)Card SortingGrounded Theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
現今產品設計的形式涵蓋各種可能性,現成物是其中的一種表達的介質,它運用既有的物品或人造物結合而成的方式,打破我們對東西習以為常的印象。這些既平常又陌生的作品,究竟有什麼獨特的美學特徵?與其他產品有何不同?ERP腦波實驗是否可以幫助我們更深入理解人們對現成物直覺反應?能否與一般偵測這種「錯誤安排方式」的N400和LPC成分相互驗證?現成物繼承了先期的藝術歷史,是否真的能完全轉化成為產品?這些皆是本研究感興趣的問題。
本研究內容分為五個階段進行:第一階段,文獻探討現成物作品,分別從藝術創作、產品設計、材料再生領域中,比較它們在形式與內涵上的異同。第二階段,以現成物產品設計為樣本、卡片分類為任務、紮根理論為分析工具,深入訪談與剖析受試者的認知。經編碼程序,主軸編碼依序為:(1)選擇構件、(2)提取功能、(3)編輯技法、(4)成形感知,以及(5)解讀意義。第三階段,ERP實驗I檢測不同產品的語意脈絡。樣本以桌椅配對為任務,以一般桌子,各別搭配四種風格椅子(一般、極簡、現成物、解構)。ERP I結果顯示,現成物和解構激起的N400和LPC效果最強,表現形式異於極簡和一般風格,而且兩者的語意脈絡也不同。第四階段,ERP實驗II則進一步檢視設計背景和非設計背景對現成物的認知差異。樣本使用四種由不同構件組成的現成物。ERP II結果顯示,具設計背景受試者的N400成分最高,表示設計師反應面向廣,觀察力較一般民眾敏銳。最後階段,將可實行的現成物創作流程和方針,導入現成物的實務創作。其設計成果有別於一般可見的產品,雖不如市面上的產品可提供大量生產的模式,但它確實能激起設計師的創意和反思。本研究結果可以掌握現成物的特徵、借用的規則、使用者可能的反應,亦能幫助本研究用客觀的觀點看待現成物在產品設計上的定位及存在的現象,並可提供設計師創作時的聯想脈絡之參考。
The styles of product design have reached all kinds of possibilities, and ready-made is one these kinds. Using existing objects or artificial components is very much against our common sense. What unique aesthetic characteristics can be presented in combinations of familiar and strange works? What are the differences between ready-made and other products? Can the ERP tool help us to understand direct human responses? Can the effect of different ‘wrong ways’ of arranging existing objects be detected in the N400 and LPC waveforms in different regions of the brain? With reference to early art history, can ready-made objects be fully transformed into novel products? All of these questions are of interest to us.
This study was divided into five stages. First this study analyzes ready-made designs by conducting a literature survey; it then classifies them into three categories: art design, product design and material recycling, to determine the differences in form and content, respectively. Second, the experiment uses ready-made product designs of the second category as samples, card sorting as the task and grounded theory as the analytical tool with which to interview and examine subjects' reactions. After the coding process, the axial coding totals five characters: (1) the selection component, (2) the extraction function, (3) compilation technology, (4) form perception and (5) interpretation. Third, the ERP Study I investigates how semantic networks represent different artistic products. The ERP Study I was recorded while participants made style-match judgments about table and chair sets. All of the tables were in normal styles, whereas, the chairs were in either normal, minimal, ready-made or deconstruction styles. The ERP I results found that both the ready-made and the deconstruction styles elicited N400 and LPC effects, which suggest that the forms of these two design styles possess differences from the minimal and normal styles. Furthermore, these results reveal that the semantic networks represent different design styles for the ready-made and the deconstruction styles. Fourth, an ERP Study II was recorded for the cognitive differences between the participants with design and non-design backgrounds to the ready-made design. The stimuli were used for five types of objects with differential percentages. The ERP II results showed that participants with design backgrounds elicited a higher N400 effect than the non-design background participants did, suggesting that the designers responded to a wider area and are more sensitive than the non-design background participants. Lastly, this study performs design guides and processes them into a ready-made design workshop. Since the design works are different from usual products, these works cannot provide a model for mass production. However, ready-mades can inspire designers’ creativity and thinking. The results can grasp deconstruction techniques and principles of ready-made designs and possible responses of users. This helps us to objectively review the orientation of ready-mades in product design and the phenomenon of its existence.
英文部分
1. Andreassi, J. L. (2000). Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response, New Jersey: Lawrence ErlbraumAssociates.
2. Andrews, S., Shelley, A. M., Ward, P. B., Fox, A., Catts, S. V., &; McCognaghy, N. (1993). Event-related potential indexes of semantic processing in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 443-458.
3. Antonelli, P. (1997). Curator’s essay (MoMa). Retrieved November 1, 2011, from http://www.moma.org/exhibitions/1997/castiglioni/essay.html
4. Arad, R. (2007). Chair Man: Ron Arad is the art world's favourite furniture designer, and his original pieces sell for hundreds of thousands. Here, he tells Susie Rushton about his latest creations. THE INDEPENDENT. Retrieved May 31, 2011, from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/house-and-home/interiors/chair-man-ron-arad-is-the-art-worlds-favourite-furniture-designer-and-his-original-pieces-sell-for-hundreds-of-thousands-here-he-tells-susie-rushton-about-his-latest-creations-744593.html
5. Azizian, A., &; Polich, J. (2007). Evidence for attentional gradient in the serial position memory curve from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 2071-2081.
6. Batty, M., &; Taylor, M.J. (2003). Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 613-620.
7. Bentin, S., &; Peled, B. S. (1990). The contribution of task-related factors to ERP repetition effects at short and long lags. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 359-366.
8. Bentin, S., Moscovitch, M., &; Heth, I. (1992). Memory with and without awareness: performance and electrophysiological evidence of savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18, 1270-1283.
9. Bhaskaran, L. (2005). Designs of the times: Using key movements and styles for contemporary design. London: RotoVision. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 443-458.
10. Bobes, M. A., Lei, M. A., Ibanez, S., Yi, H., &; Valdes-Sosa, M. (1996). Semantic matching of pictures in schizophrenia: A cross-cultural ERP study. Biol. Psychiatry 40, 189-202.
11. Bruce, V., &; Humphreys, G. (1994). Recognizing faces and objects. Visual Cognition, 1, 141-180.
12. Cheng, S. K., &; Rugg, M.D. (2004). An event-related potential study of two kinds of source judgment errors. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 113-127.
13. Ciuraru, C. (2009). Ron Arad: No Discipline at MoMA. California Literary Review. Retrieved September 5, 2012, from http://calitreview.com/4513
14. Coles, M., &; Rugg, M. D. (1996). Event-related brain potentials: an introduction. In Rugg, M. D., &; Coles, M.(Eds.) Electrophysiology of Mind. Oxyford University Press.
15. Culler, J. (2008). On deconstruction: theory and criticism after structuralism. New York: Routledge.
16. Debruille, J. B., &; Renoult, L. (2009). Effects of semantic matching and of semantic category on reaction time and N400 that resist numerous repetitions. Neuropsychologia, 47 (2), 506-17.
17. Delplanque, S., Silvert, L., Hot, P., Rigoulot, S., Sequeira, H. (2006). Arousal and valence effects on event-related P3a and P3b during emotional categorization, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 315 - 322.
18. Dolcos, F., &; Cabeza, R. (2002). Event-related potentials of emotional memory: encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(3), 252-263.
19. Eddy, M. D., &; Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for size invariance in masked picture repetition priming. Brain and Cognition, 71, 397-409.
20. Ellis, A. E., &; Nelson, C. A. (1999). Category prototypicality judgments in adults and children: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15, 193-211.
21. Fabiani, C. (2005). Preservation for the future. Reed Business Information, New York, Interior Design, 76(9), 196-202.
22. Fernando, C. &; Humberto, C. (2010). Campana Brothers: Complete Works (So Far). New York: Random House.
23. Ferrari, P. (2012). Achille Castiglioni. London: Phaidon.
24. Fischer, V. (1989). Design Now: Industry or Art? Munich: Prestal-Verlag.
25. Freitag, M., &; Freitag, D. (2009). FREITAG - customized bag. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.seedsandfruit.com/2009/10/freitag-customized-bags/
26. Freitag, M., &; Freitag, D. (2011). The history of the unique Freitag bag. FREITAG. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.freitag.ch/shop/FREITAG/page/History_page/detail.jsf
27. Friedman, D. (1990). Cognitive event-related potential components during continuous recognition memory for pictures. Psychophysiology, 27, 136-148.
28. Gamper, M. (2002a). Coming Home. Retrieved May 18, 2011, from http://www.gampermartino.com/projects/coming-home/
29. Gamper, M. (2002b). We Make Remake. Retrieved May 18, 2011, from http://www.gampermartino.com/projects/we-make-remake/
30. Gamper, M. (2007). A 100 Chairs in 100 Days. Retrieved May 18, 2011, from http://www.gampermartino.com/projects/a-100-chairs-in-a-100-days/
31. Gerlach, C., Law, I., &; Paulson, O. B. (2004). Structural similarity and category-specificity: a refined account. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1543-1553.
32. Goodman, J., Clarke, S., Langdon, P., &; Clarkson, J. P. (2007). Designers’ Perceptions of Methods of Involving and Understanding Users. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4554, 127-136.
33. Gregg, A. (2009). Bike Furniture Design. Retrieved June 1, 2011, from http://www.bikefurniture.com/pages1/about.htm
34. Guerra, S., Ibanez, A., Martin, M., Bobes, M. A., Reyes, A., Mendoza, R., Bravo, T., Dominguez, M. &; Sosa, M. V. (2009). N400 deficits from semantic matching of pictures in probands and first-degree relatives from multiplex schizophrenia families, Brain and Cognition, 70(2), 221-230.
35. Guidot, R., &; Boissiere, O. (1998). Ron Arad, Paris: Dis Voir, 12-13.
36. Hajcak, G., &; Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(4), 291-297.
37. Hajcak, G., Moser, J. S., &; Simons, R. F. (2006). Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. Emotion, 6(3), 517-522.
38. Heil, M., Rolke, B., &; Pecchinenda, A. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth: Semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects. Psychological Science, 15, 852-857.
39. Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., &; Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887-900.
40. Iversen, M. (2004).Readymade, Found Object, Photograph. Art Journal, 63(2), 45-57.
41. Juottonen, K., Revonsuo, A., &; Lang, H. (1996). Dissimilar age influences on two ERP waveforms (LPC and N400) reflecting semantic context effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 4, 99-107.
42. Karayanidis, F., Andrews, S., &; Ward, P. B. (1991). Effects of interterm lag on word repetition performance: an event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 28, 307-318.
43. Karis, D., Fabiani, M., &; Donchin, E. (1984). "P300" and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 177-216.
44. Kern, R. P., Libkuman, T. M., Otani, H., &; Holmes, K. (2005). Emotional stimuli, divided attention, and memory. Emotion, 5(4), 408-417.
45. Kiefer, M. (2001). Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 100-116.
46. Kuang, C. (2010). Arik Levy, Master of Detail: Design Is an Uncontrollable Muscle. Retrieved May 17, 2011, from http://www.fastcompany.com/1650508/arik-levy-master-of-details.
47. Kutas, M. &; Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
48. Kutas, M. &; Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials reflect word expectancy and semantic association during reading. Nature, 307, 161-163.
49. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., &; Cuthbert, B. N. (2001). International Affective Picture System: Technical Manual and Affective Ratings, NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.
50. Laws, K. R., &; Neve, C. (1999). A "normal" category-specific advantage for naming living things. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1263-1269.
51. Lee, K. C. K., &; Cassidy, T. (2007). Principles of design leadership for industrial design teams in Taiwan. Design Studies, 28(4), 437-462.
52. Levy, A. (2007). Transplastic. DesignBoom. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://www.designboom.com/contemporary/transplastic.html
53. Levy, A. (2011). Stockholm furniture fair lounge. DesignBoom. Retrieved May 17, 2011, from http://www.designboom.com/weblog/cat/8/view/13153/arik-levy-2011-stockholm- furniture-fair-lounge.html
54. Lin, H. M. (2003). Affective and Communicational Effect in Product Design - a Case Study Based on Alessi Kettles. The Science of Design. The Science of Design, 49(6), 77-84.
55. Lin, H. M., &; Fang, Y. M. (2007). The feature manipulation and cognition in contemporary vernacular design. The Science of Design, 54(1), 21-30.
56. Lin, M .H., Wang, C. Y., Cheng, S. K., &; Cheng, S. H. (2011a). An event-related potential study of semantic style-match judgments of artistic furniture. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 82, 188-195.
57. Lin, M. H., Fang, Y. M., &; Wang, C. Y. (2011b). A preliminary study of applying ERP on users’ reactions to web pages with different presentation formats. The Science of Design, 57(5), 89-98.
58. Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Luo, Y. J., &; Huang, Y. X. (2006). Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 398, 91-96.
60. Luo, Y. J., Wei, X., &; Wei, J. H. (2001). ERP effects of recognition of Chinese spoken and written words recognition. NeuroImage, 13(6), 562-562.
61. Mathalon, D. H., Roach, B. J., and Ford, J. M. (2010) Automatic semantic priming abnormalities in schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 75, 157-166.
62. McCarthy, G., &; Wood, C.C. (1985). Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance methods. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 62, 203-208.
63. McGuirk, J. (2006). Jurgen Bey. ICON, 39.
64. Moore, C. J., &; Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain, 122, 943-962.
65. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In: D. Besner, &; G. Humphreys (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Neely, J. H., &; Kahan, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In: H. L., Roediger (Ed.). The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of R.G. Crowder (pp. 69-93.). Washington: APA.
67. Neville, H. J., Kutas, M., Chesney, G., &; Schmidt, A. L. (1986). Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 75-92.
68. Nunez-Pena, M. I., &; Honrubia-Serrano, M. L. (2005). N400 and category exemplar associative strength. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 56, 45-54.
69. Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., &; Polich, J. (2008). Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77(3), 247-265.
70. Olofsson, J.K., &; Polich, J. (2007). Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biological Psychology 75, 101-108.
71. Otten, L. J., &; Rugg, M. D. (2005). Interpreting event-related brain potentials. In T. C. Handy (Ed.), Event-related potentials: a methods handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Palomba, D., Angrilli, A., &; Mini, A. (1997). Visual evoked potentials, heart rate responses and memory to emotional pictorial stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 27(1), 55-67.
73. Paz-Caballero, D., Cuetos, F., &; Dobarro, A. (2006). Electrophysiological evidence for a natural/artifactual dissociation. Brain Research, 1067, 189-200.
74. Polano, S. (2002). Achille Castiglioni complete works. Electa Architecture, Milano. Potentials Research (EEG suppl. 40), Amsterdam: Elsevier, 198-203.
75. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
76. Pritchard, W. S., Shappell, S. A., &; Brandt, M. W. (1991). Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. Advances in psychophysiology, 4, 43-106.
77. Proverbio, A. M., Zotto M. D., &; Zani, A. (2007). The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition. BMC Neuroscience, 8(24), 1-16.
78. Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of the Mind: Studies with modern imageing techniques. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 333-356.
79. Ramakers, R. (2006). Simply Droog: 10 + 3 years of creating innovation and discussion. Amsterdam: Droog.
80. Ramirez, J. A. (1998). Duchamp: love and death, even. London: Reaktion Books.
81. Rashid, K. (2004). Karim Rashid: evolution. New York: Universe.
82. Rawsthorn, A. (2007). Ingo Maurer: The magic of his light years. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/31/style/31iht-design3.1.7332345.html
83. Rawsthorn, A. (2008). Enzo Mari: A rebel with an obsession for form. Retrieved September 6, 2011, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/03/style/03iht-design3.1.17414904.html
84. Richter, H. (1997). Dada: art and anti-art. New York: Thames and Hudson.
85. Rolke, B., Heil, M., Streb, J., &; Hennighausen, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
86. Rugg, M. D. &; Nagy, M. E. (1989). Event-related potentials and recognition memory for words. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 72, 395-406.
87. Rugg, M. D. (1990). Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high- and low-frequency words. Memory and Cognition, 18, 367-379.
88. Scha, R. J. H. (2001). Readymades, Artificial Art, New Media. Exploding Aesthetics, 16, 40-47.
89. Schadewitz, N. (2009). Design patterns for cross-cultural collaboration. International Journal of Design, 3(3), 37-53.
90. Schupp, H. T., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. I., &; Hamm, A. O. (2004a). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: an ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41, 441-449.
91. Schupp, H. T., Ohman, A., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., &; Hamm, A. O. (2004b). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion, 4 (2), 18-200.
92. Segalowitz, S.J., Van Roon, P., Dywan, J. (1997). The ERP late positivity: a graduated response to stimulus repetition. Neuroreport 8, 757-760.
93. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., &; Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23, 695-703.
94. Short, R. (1994). Dada &; surrealism. London: Laurence King.
95. Sim, E. J. &; Kiefer, M. (2005). Category-related brain activity to natural categories is associated with the retrieval of visual features: Evidence from repetition effects during visual and functional judgments, Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 260-273.
96. Smith, M. E, &; Halgren, E. (1989). Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Congnition, 15, 50-60.
97. Starr, J. (2009). Tu-Be or Not Tu-Be: Desk Lamp by Ingo Maurer. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://3rings.designerpages.com/2009/08/31/tu-be-or-not-tu-be-desk-lamp- by-ingo-maurer/
98. Strauss, A., &; Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
99. Stuss, D. T., Picton, T. W., &; Cerri, A. M. (1988). Electrophysiological manifestations of typicality judgments. Brain Langue. 33, 260-272.
100. Stylepark (2007), Ingo Maurer: TU-BE 1. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from http://www.stylepark.com/en/ingo-maurer/tu-be-1
101. Sudjic, D. (1989). Ron Arad: restless furniture, New York: Rizzoli.
102. Taki, Y. (2004). From the legacy of the Castiglioni brothers. AXIS, 111, 127-131.
103. Thompson, K. (2009). Recreate is a cutting edge interior design range started by Katie Thompson in 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2011, from http://www.recreate.za.net/about
104. Turnbull, O. H., &; Laws, K. R. (2000). Loss of stored knowledge of object structure: Implications for "category-specific" deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 365-389.
105. Vendredi, J. (2009). Not just Design. Retrieved May 31, 2011, from http://ecran-voile.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html
106. Wanninger, C. (2009). Arik Levy: The Guesthouse workshop is like a marathon. IMM cologne, 4, 10-20. Retrieved May 17, 2011, from http://www.imm-cologne.com/global/dokumente/imm/en/IMM09_06_Trends_E_en.pdf
107. Wong, J. F. (2010). The text of free-form architecture: Qualitative study of the discourse of four architects. Design Studies, 31 (3), 237-267.
108. Yuan, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, A., Li, H., Wang, Q., Zhuang, Z., &; Jia, S. (2007). Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2764-2771.

中文部分
1. Eddie, W. (1992). 拼貼藝術之歷史(History of collage) (傅嘉琿譯),台北市:遠流。
2. Strauss, A., &; Corbin, J. (2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理稐研究法(Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory)(吳芝儀、廖梅花譯),嘉義市:濤石文化。(原作1998年出版)
3. Willy, R., (1991). 物體藝術(Objekt kunst)(吳瑪悧譯),台北市:遠流。
4. 周穆謙、王韋堯(2007)。 設計師與消費者在食品包裝理解力傳達設計之認知差異。設計學報,12(4),21-42。
5. 宋敏(2007)。Martino Gamper:用椅子拼貼的義大利人。2011年5月18日自網站http://www.britishcouncil.org/zh/china-arts-design-getitlouder-artists-martino_gamper.htm取得。
6. 張光琪(2003)。馬格利特。台北:藝術家。
7. 方裕民、林銘煌、廖軍豪(2006)。「失諧-解困」理論與設計邏輯中的幽默理解歷程。設計學報,11(2),65-81。
8. 林銘煌、方裕民、鄭仕弘(2008)。幽默設計的類別與表現技巧。設計學報,13(3),61-80。
9. 林銘煌、鄭仕弘(2004)。原型理論與原型設計。設計學報,9(4),1-16。
10. 林銘煌、鄭仕弘(2008)。剖析Castiglioni的設計美學與影響。工業設計雜誌,36(3),188-193。
11. 楊世瑩(2009)。SPSS統計分析即學即用。台北市:□峰。
12. 洪偉肯、陳玲鈴(2010)。如何量測產品的矛盾語意。設計學報,15(4),41-58。
13. 洪穎真(2007)。復古新潮流(上):古典元素的當代應用。工業設計雜誌,138,76-79。
14. 洪穎真(2009a)。打撈日常的漂浮物,化高價設計品:巴西兄弟檔Fernando and Humberto Campana。設計雜誌,145,29-33。
15. 洪穎真(2009b)。Turn Trash into Treasure:泰國設計師Singh Intrachooto的點石成金術。設計雜誌,145,34-37。
16. 王靜儀、林銘煌(2010)。剖析Jurgen Bey的設計美學。工業設計雜誌,38(1),96-101。
17. 謝碧娥(2008)。杜象:從反藝術到無藝術-美學藝術。台北市:秀威資訊科技。
18. 趙倫(2004)。ERP實驗教程。中國:天津社會科學院。
19. 鄭仕坤(2005)。事件相關腦電位在情節記憶的研究進展。應用心理研究,28 ,75-90。
20. 鄭仕弘、林盛宏、林銘煌(2010)。Operation Follows Meanings: 以雙重隱喻之燈具探索語意式操作脈絡。設計學報,15(3), 1-19.
21. 陸谷孫(1996). 英漢大辭典(The English-Chinese dictionary)。台北市:東華。
22. 魏景漢、羅躍嘉(2002)。認知事件相關腦電位教程。中國:經濟日報。
23. 黃庭超(2003)。杜象的現成物,達達與前衛之外:兼論對台灣裝置藝術現象的觀察。二十世紀西洋繪畫主流之探討研討會,2003新異象論壇藝術論文集,台北市:中華民國後立體派畫會。

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE