:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以雄渾論分析拜倫三部著作:〈紀隆的囚犯〉、〈黑暗〉和《曼弗雷德》
作者:尼琅菘
作者(外文):Jon Eric Nichols
校院名稱:國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱:英語學系
指導教授:張逸帆 博士
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2013
主題關鍵詞:拜倫雄渾論紀隆的囚犯黑暗曼弗雷德Lord ByronThe SublimeThe Prisoner of ChillonDarknessManfred
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:19
本論文採用浪漫時期三個重要的雄渾理論,分析拜倫三部主要作品中的雄渾。拜倫較少被視為雄渾作家的代表,然而他的許多作品呈現浪漫時期的雄渾精神。
早在拜倫發展成為成熟的作家之前,不少雄渾理論已經發展完成,並已明確指出,有哪些經驗符合雄渾的定義。本論文採用三位理論家的雄渾理論,作為分析拜倫作品的主要框架。這三位理論家是:希臘評論家卡修斯朗吉弩斯(Cassius Longinus),愛爾蘭政治家德蒙伯克(Edmund Burke),以及德國哲學家康德(Immanuel Kant)。這三位理論家對於浪漫時期雄渾理論的發展和運用有極大的影響力,因此本論文採用他們的理論來分析拜倫作品。
本文分析拜倫的三部作品:〈紀隆的囚犯〉(The Prisoner of Chillon),〈黑暗〉(Darkness)和《曼弗雷德》(Manfred)。這些作品皆完成於1816年,豐富地呈現拜倫雄渾的特質和他創作時的心態。在創作這三部作品時,拜倫正面臨個人情感的困境;他的婚姻由於醜聞爆發而濱臨破裂,隨即他離開祖國英國,選擇自我放逐的生活。這些情感上的混亂與不安,轉換成創作的能量,使拜倫得以寫出這些雄渾的作品。
本論文包括五章。第一章說明本論文研究動機,浪漫時期的歷史背景,並針對拜倫的研究進行文獻回顧。第二章運用朗吉弩斯的崇高理論,用以分析拜倫詩作〈紀隆的囚犯〉。第三章採用伯克的雄渾論,用以檢視拜倫詩作〈黑暗〉中呈現的雄渾特質。第四章以康德的雄渾論來解析拜倫的劇作《曼弗雷德》。第五章為結論,綜論雄渾論在浪漫時期及其後的發展,並評估這些雄渾理論後續的發展對於拜倫作品的優點。
This dissertation argues that many of Lord Byron’s works feature the characteristics which were generally associated with the practice of the sublime within the Romantic era, even though Byron is usually less appreciated as a writer of the sublime. To substantiate my central arguments, three important works by Lord Byron were selected to be analyzed with three theories of the sublime which were in prominence during the Romantic era.
By the time Lord Byron had reached maturity as a writer, several theories had already been developed for determining which experiences were evocative of the sublime and which experiences were not. In this dissertation the theories to be employed as the theoretical framework for my analyses were developed by Cassius Longinus, the Greek critic, Edmund Burke, the Irish statesman, and the German philosopher Immanuel Kant. These three theorists were chosen because of their influence upon the development and practice of the sublime during the Romantic era.
The three works by Byron which are analyzed are “The Prisoner of Chillon,” “Darkness” and Manfred. These works—primarily composed in 1816—display the richness of their sublime attributes as well as Byron’s mental state as he composed them. Each of these works was written while he was dealing with the emotional turmoil that proceeded from the scandalous dissolution of his marriage and his subsequent self-imposed exile from England. Emotional turmoil of this sort is speculated to be crucial to the creation of works with sublime attributes.
This dissertation contains five chapters. The first chapter, the introduction, provides the motivation, a historical context and a literature review. Chapter two provides an analysis of the poem “The Prisoner of Chillon” using Longinus’ theory of the sublime. Chapter three introduces Edmund Burke’s concept of the sublime and utilizes his guidelines for identifying the sublime as a theoretical framework in order to analyze Byron’s poem “Darkness.” Chapter four uses Kant’s notion of the sublime as the basis for conducting an analysis of Byron’s drama Manfred. The final chapter is devoted to a brief discussion of some of the theories of the sublime which were either developed within or after the Romantic era. In so doing, this dissertation aims to evaluate their relative merits for the purpose of analyzing the works of Lord Byron.
Bach, C.P.E. Essay on the True Art of Playing Keyboard Instruments. Trans. William Mitchell New York: W.W.,1949.
Balfour, Ian. Genres of the Sublime: Byronic Tragedy, Manfred, and “The Alpine Journal” in the Light of some European Contemporaries. Revue de l'Université de Moncton Special Issue (2005): 3-25.
Blessington, Marguerite. A Journal of the Conversations of Lord Byron with the Countess of Blessington. London: Richard Bently and Son, 1834.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Ed. A. Phillips. New York: Oxford U.P., 1990.
Byron, G.G. His Very Self and Voice: Collected Conversations of Lord Byron. Ed. Lovell, E. J. New York: Macmillan, 1954.
---. Byron’s Poetry. Ed. F. D. McConnell. New York: Norton, 1978.
---. Byron’s Letters and Journals. Ed. L. Marchand. London: John Murray, 1973-94.
---. Byron’s Letters and Journals, Volume VI: ‘The Flesh is Frail’, 1818-1819 . Ed. L. Marchand. Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard U.P., 1976.
Caputo, John. “Community Without Community.” Deconstruction in a Nutshell. New York: Fordham U. P., 1997.
Carlyle, Thomas. Sartor Resartus: The Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdrockh. Ed. Archibald Mac Mechan. Boston, and London: Ginn, 1897.
Cowper, William. The Poems of William Cowper: Volume I: 1748-1782. New York: Oxford U.P., 1980.
Day, Aidan. Romanticism: the New Critical Idiom. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
Drinkwater, John. The Pilgrim of Eternity: Byron—A Conflict. London and Aylesbury: Hazell, Watson and Viney, 1925.
Eisler, Benita. Byron: Child of Passion, Fool of Fame. New York: First Vintage Books, 2000.
Goode, Clement T. George Gordon, Lord Byron: A Comprehensive, Annotated Research Bibliography of Secondary Materials in English 1973-1994. London: Scarecrow Press, 1997.
Graham, Geoff. “Sensation and Classification.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 7. (1984): 558–559.
Grosskurth, Phyllis. Byron: The Flawed Angel. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.
Hartman, Geoffrey. “Romanticism and ‘Anti-Self- Consciousness’.” Centennial Review. Autumn.6 (4): (1962): 553-565.
Jung, Carl. The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche, Collected Works. Vol.8. New Jersey: Princeton U.P., 1970.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Cambridge: Hackett, 1987.
---. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1998.
---. Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime: Trans. John T. Goldthwaite. Berkeley: California U.P., 2003.
Lee, W. “William Wordsworth’s Aesthetics of Body: The Picturesque, the Sublime, and the Beautiful.” Diss. National Taiwan Normal University, 2010.
Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992.
Leitch, V. B., Cain, W. E., Finke, L., Johnson, B., McGowan, J., and Williams, J. J. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 1st Edition. New York: Norton, 2001.
Longinus. On the Sublime. Trans. H. L. Havell. London and New York: MacMillan, 1890.
Lyotard, Jean-François. Postmodern Fables. Trans. G.V.D. Abbeele, 1993 . Minneapolis: Minnesota U.P., 1997.
---. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi, 1979. Minneapolis: Minnesota U.P., 1999.
Marchand, Leslie. Byron: A Biography. 3 volumes. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1957.
---. Byron's Letters and Journals. 13 volumes. Cambridge: Belknap of Harvard U.P., 1980-93.
---. Byron: A Portrait. New York: Knopf, 1970.
Mayne, Ethel Colburn. Byron. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1924.
McGann, Jerome. Lord Byron: The Complete Poetical Works. 7 volumes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980-83.
Michael, J. “Positive and Negative Reinforcement, A Distinction That is No Longer Necessary; Or a Better Way to Talk About Bad Things.” Behaviorism. 3. (1975): 33–44.
Milbank, Ralph. Astarte. London: Christopher’s of London, 1909.
Modiano, Raimonda. Coleridge and the Concept of Nature. Tallahassee: Florida State U.P., 1985.
Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. Ann Arbor: Michigan U.P., 1960.
Moore, Thomas. Letters and Journals of Lord Byron with Notices of his life in two Volumes. New York: J and J Harper, 1830.
“Mount Aconcagua”. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Oct.12, 2012
.
Nicholson, Andrew. “Review of Clement Tyson Goode, Jr. ed. George Gordon, Lord Byron: A Comprehensive, Annotated Research Bibliography of Secondary Materials in English 1973-1994.” Romanticism on the Net. Numéro 11. (1998). .
Paley, Morton. “Envisioning Lastness: Byron’s ‘Darkness,’ Campbell's ‘The Last Man and the Critical Aftermath.” Romanticism: The Journal of Romantic Culture and Criticism. 1. (1995): 1-14.new window
Payne, Geoff. Dark Imaginings: Ideology and “Darkness” in the Poetry of Lord Byron. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.
Pryce-Jones, David. “The Dark Lord.” National Review. 6 July (2009):40.
Rutherford, Andrew. Byron: A Critical Study. Stanford: Stanford U.P., 1962.
Santucho, Oscar. George Gordon, Lord Byron: A Comprehensive Bibliography of Secondary Materials in English, 1807-1974, with a Critical Review of Research. Metuchen, New Jersey: The Scarecrow Press, 1977.
Schroeder, Ronald A. “Byron's ‘Darkness’ and the Romantic Dis-Spiriting of Nature.” Approaches to Teaching Byron's Poetry. F. W. Shilstone Ed. New York: Mod. Lang. Assn. of America, 1991.
Sharp, William. Sonnets of this Century. London and New York: Walter Scott, 1880.
Shaw, Phillip. The Sublime: the New Critical Idiom. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.
Stafford, Fiona J. The Last of the Race: The Growth of a Myth from Milton to Darwin. New York: Oxford U.P., 1994.
Stevens, Harold H. “‘I Am More Fit to Die Than People Think’: Byron on Immortality.” Christianity and Literature. 55.3 (2006): 333-336.
Stolnitz, J. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 1. London: Macmillan, (1973): 226.new window
Stowe, Harriet Beecher. Lady Byron Vindicated: A History of the Byron Controversy, from Its Beginning in 1816 to the Present Time1870. Boston: Fields, Osgood Co., 1870.
Thorslev, Peter. The Byronic Hero: Types and Prototypes. Minnesota Archive Edition. Minnesota U.P., 1962.
Trott, N. The Picturesque, the Beautiful and the Sublime. A Companion to Romanticism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.
Trelawney, Edward John. Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron. Boston: Tricknor and Fields, 1858.
Vail, Jeffrey. “‘The Bright Sun Was Extinguis’d:’ the Bologna Prophecy and Byron’s ‘Darkness’.” Wordsworth Circle. 28. (1997): 183-92
Weiskel, Thomas.The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U.P., 1976.
Žižek, S. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso, 1999.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE