1.Abraham, B. P. and Moitra, S. D., 2001. Innovation assessment through patent analysis, Technovation, 21(4), 245-252.
2.Ahuja, G., 2000. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 317-343.
3.Anderson, H., Havila, V., Andersen, P. and Halinen, A. 1998. Position and role - conceptualizing dynamics in business networks, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3), 167-186.
4.Archibugi, D. and Planta, M., 1996. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys, Technovation, 16(9), 451-468.
5.Arora, A., Gambardella, A., 1994. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 24, 91–114.
6.Baum, J.A.C., Calabrese, T., Silverman, B.S., 2000. Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 267–294
7.Bierly, P., Damanpour, F. and Santoro, M. 2009. ‘The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation’. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 481-509.
8.Bonacich, P. 1972. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2, 12-120.
9.Borgatti, S.P. and Halgin, D. “Network theorizing,” Organization Science, 2011-Forthcoming.
10.Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. 1997. Network analysis of 2-mode data, Social Networks, 19(3), 243-269.
11.Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G. and Freeman, L.C. 2005. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
12.Breiger, R.L. 1974. The duality of persons and groups, Social Forces, 24, 201-229.
13.Breiger, R.L. 1995. Social structure and the phenomenology of attainment, Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 115-136.
14.Breschi, S., Lissoni, F. and Malerba, F. 2003. Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification, Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87.
15.Burt, R.S. 1976, Positions in networks, Social Forces, 55, 93-122.
16.Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
17.Burt, R.S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas, American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
18.Cantner, U. and Graf H. 2006. The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis, Research Policy, 35, 463-480.
19.Cappelin, R. 2003. Networks and Technological Change in Regional Clusters,” in J.Brocker, D. Dohse and R. Soltwedel (eds), Innovation Clusters and Regional Competition, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 52-78.
20.Chen, Y. S. and Chang, K. C., 2010. The relationship between a firm''s patent quality and its market value -- The case of US pharmaceutical industry, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 20-33.
21.Choi, C. and Park, Y., 2009. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 754-768.
22.Choi, C., Kim, S. and Park, Y., 2007. A patent-based cross impact analysis for quantitative estimation of technological impact: The case of information and communication technology, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(8), 1296-1314.
23.Cohen,W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capability: a newperspective on learning innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
24.Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H. and Gerdsri, P., 2006. Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981-1012.
25.Davis, A., Gardner, B., and Gardner, R. 1941. Deep South, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.Dhanaraj, C. and Parkhe, A. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 659-669.
27.Doreian, P and Fararo, T.J. 1985, Structural equivalence in a journal network, Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 10(3), 28-37.
28.Doreian, P. 1985, Structural equivalence in a psychology journal network, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(6), 411-417.
29.Dyer, J.H., Nobeoka, K., 2000. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3), 345–368.
30.Dyer, J.H., Singh, H., 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.
31.Eisenhardt, K., Schoonhoven, C.B., 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7, 136–150.
32.Ejermo, O. and Karlsson, C. 2006. Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships, Research Policy, 35(3), 412–430.
33.Ernst, H., Legler, S. and Lichtenthaler, U., 2010. Determinants of patent value: Insights from a simulation analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(1), 1-19.
34.Faust, K. 1997. Centrality in affiliation networks, Social. Networks, 19, 157–191.
35.Faust, K. and Wasserman, S. 1992. Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis, Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4, 23-78.
36.Field S, Frank KA, Schiller K, Riegle-Crumb C. and Muller C. 2006. Identifying positions from affiliation networks: Preserving the duality of people and events, Social Network, 28(2), 97-123.
37.Freeman, L.C., 1979. Centrality in social networks. I. Conceptual clarification, Social Networks, 1, 215–239.
38.Friedkin, N. 1991. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures,” American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1478 – 1504.
39.Gay B. and Dousset B. 2005, Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry, Research policy, 34, 1457-1474.
40.Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G. and van den Oord, A. 2008. ''Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717-1731.
41.Glasmeier, A., 1991. Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: the case of Switzerland and the world watch industry. Research Policy, 20, 469–485.
42.Granstrand, O., Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1997. Multitechnology corporations: why they have distributed rather than distinctive core competencies, Calif. Manage. Rev, 39 (4), 8-25.
43.Grant, R.M. and Baden-Fuller, C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliance. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61-85.
44.Gulati, R. 1995. Social structure and alliance formation pattern: a longitudinal analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652.
45.Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
46.Gulati, R., 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.
47.Hagedoorn, J., 1993. Understanding the rationale for strategic technology partnering: interorganizational models of co-operation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 371–386.
48.Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G.M., 2002. Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks, the efficacy of quasi-redundant contacts. Organization Studies, 23, 525–548.
49.Hamel, G.P., Doz, Y., Prahalad, C.K., 1989. Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67, 133–139.
50.Hanel, P., 1994. Interindustry flows of technology: an analysis of the Canadian patent matrix and input-output matrix for 1978-1989, Technovation, 14(8), 529-548.
51.Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. 1989, Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.Hargens, L.L. 2000. Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship, American Sociological Review, 65(6), 846-865.
53.Haustein, H. D. and Neuwirth, E., 1982. Long waves in world industrial production, energy consumption, innovations, inventions, and patents and their identification by spectral analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 22(1), 53-89.
54.Hawley, A. 1950, Human Ecology: A Theory of Community Structure. New York, NY: The Ronald Press.
55.Haythornthwaite, C., 1996. Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. LISR, 18, 323-342.
56.Hung, S. W. and Tang, R. H., 2008. Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan, Technovation, 28(9), 551-563.
57.Kale, P., Singh, H., Perlmutter, H., 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (Special Issue), 217–237.
58.Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N., 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 193–210.
59.Kinder, T., 2003. Go with the flow- a conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise. Research Policy, 32, 503-523.
60.Knoke, D. and R.S. Burt, 1983. Prominence, in: R.S. Burt and M.J. Minor, eds., Applied network analysis (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 195-222.
61.Knoke, D. and Yang, S. 2008. Social network analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences, Sage Publications, 2nd Ed.
62.Lavie, D. and Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation, Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 797-818.
63.Lee, J., Veloso, F. M., Hounshell, D. A. and Rubin, E. S., 2009. Forcing technological change: A case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US, Technovation, In Press, Corrected Proof
64.Lee, S., Yoon, B. and Park, Y., 2009. An approach to discovering new technology opportunities: Keyword-based patent map approach, Technovation, 29, 481-497
65.Lee, S., Yoon, B., Lee, C. and Park, J., 2009. Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmapping, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 769-786.
66.Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M. and Montressor, S. 1996, Intersectorial innovation flows and national technological system network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany, Research Policy, 25, 415–430.
67.Leydesdorff, L. 2004, Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports, Journal of Documentation, 60(4), 371-427.
68.Li, Y. R., 2009. The technological roadmap of Cisco''s business ecosystem, Technovation, 29(5), 379-386.
69.Lorrain, F. and H.C. White. 1971, Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 49-80.
70.Ma, Z. and Lee, Y., 2008. Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980-2005, Technovation, 28(6), 379-390.
71.Ma, Z., Lee, Y. and Chen, C. F. P., 2009. Booming or emerging? China''s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787-796.
72.Miller, D.J., Fern, M.J. and Cardinal, L.B. 2007. The use of knowledge for technological innovation within diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 308-326.
73.Mishina, Y., Pollock, T.G. and Porac, J.F. 2004. Are more resources always better for growth? resource stickiness in market and product expansion, Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1179-1197.
74.Mote, J.E. 2005. R&;D Ecology: Using 2-Mode Network Analysis to Understand Complexity in R&;D Environments, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1-2), 93-111.
75.Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E. and Silverman, B.S. 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm, Research Policy, 27(5), 507-523.
76.Nelson, R.R., Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
77.Nohria, N. 1992. Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations? In Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action, edited by N. Nohria and R. C. Eccles. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
78.Nooteboom, B., 1992. Towards a dynamic theory of transactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2, 281-299.
79.Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V. and van den Oord, A. 2007. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016-1034.
80.Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W.W., 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: the effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15, 5-21.
81.Park, Y. and Kim, M. 1999, A taxonomy of industries based on knowledge flow structure, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11(4), 541-549.
82.Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1997. The technological competency of the world''s largest firms: complex path-dependent, but not much variety, Research Policy, 6(2), 141-156.
83.Pilkington, A., 2004. Technology portfolio alignment as an indicator of commercialisation: an investigation of fuel cell patenting, Technovation, 24(10), 761-771.
84.Pldolny, J.M. and Stuart, T.E. 1995, A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1224-1260.
85.Pldolny, J.M., Stuart, T.E. and Hanan, M.T. 1996, Networks, knowledge, and niches: Compttition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991, American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659-689.
86.Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
87.Price D. 1965, Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149, 510-513.
88.Quinn, J.B., 2000. Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review 41(4), 13–28.
89.Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility, Management Science, 49(6), 751-766.
90.Rothaermel, F.T. and Boeker, W. 2008. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation, Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 47-77.
91.Rowley, T., Behrens, D., Krackhardt, D., 2000. Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 21 (3), 369–386.
92.Sampson, R.C. 2007. R&;D alliances and firm performance: the impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation, Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364-386.
93.Scott, J. 2002. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Sage Publications, London, 2nd Ed.
94.Shan, W., Walker, G., Kogut, B., 1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 15, 387–394.
95.Soete, L. and Wyatt, S. 1983. The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator, Scientometrics, (Jan), 31-54.
96.Sorenson O. and Waguespack D.M. 2005, Research on special networks and the organization of research and development: an introductory essay, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1/2), 31-50.
97.Sternitzke, C., Bartkowski, A. and Schramm, R. 2008, Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools, World Patent Information, 28(2), 115-131.
98.Storto, C. L., 2006. A method based on patent analysis for the investigation of technological innovation strategies: The European medical prostheses industry, Technovation, 26(8), 932-942.
99.Stuart, T.E. 1998. Network position and Propensities to Collaborate: An investigation of statategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 668-698.
100.Stuart, T.E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry, Strategic Management Journal, 21(8), 791-811.
101.Stuart, T.E. and Podolny, J.M. 1996, Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21-38,
102.Sun, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Ma, H. and He, G., 2008. Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(7), 1032-1042.
103.Thompson, P. 2006. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: Evidence from inventor- and examiner-added citations, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 383-388.
104.Tsuji, Y. S., 2002. Organizational behavior in the R&;D process based on patent analysis: Strategic R&;D management in a Japanese electronics firm, Technovation, 22(7), 417-425.
105.Vanhaverbeke, W., Gilsing, V., Beerkens, B. and Duysters, G. 2009. The role of alliance network redundancy in the creation of core and non-core technologies’ Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 215-244.
106.von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T. and Rost, K. 2005. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis, Research Policy, 34, 1591-1607.
107.Wagner, C. S., and Leydesdorff, L. 2005. Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000, International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(2), 185-208.
108.Wassermann, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, Cambridge University Press.
109.Wilson, T.P. 1982. Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts, Social Networks, 4, 105-116.
110.Wuyts, S., Colombo, M.G., Dutta, S., Nooteboom, B. 2005. Empirical test of optimal cognitive distance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28, 277–302.
111.Yoon, B. and Park Y. 2004. A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15, 37-50.
112.Zaheer, A., Bell, G.G., 2005. Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 809–825.
113.Zahra, S.A. 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: a taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340.