|
1.Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2.Adams, D. A., R. R. Nelson, & P. A. Todd. (1992). Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication. MIS Quarterly 16, no.2: 227-247. 3.Agarwal, R. & J. Prasad. (1997). The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies. Decision Science 28, no.3: 557-582. 4.Afuah & Tucci (2001). Internet Business Models and Strategies: Text and Case, New York: McGraw Hill. 5.Chin, W. W. & P. A. Todd. (1995). On the Use, Usefulness, and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution. MIS Quarterly 19, no.2: 237-246. 6.Croft B. (1996). Ten Reasons to Use Intranet for Training. Personnel Journal, 75(7), pp. 28. 7.Chen, L. D., M. L. Gillenson, & D. L. Sherrell. (2002). Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective. Information and Management 39, no.8: 705-719. 8.Carrillo, C. I. P. D. (2004). Intelligent Agents to Improve Adaptivity in a Web-based Learning Environment. Doctoral, University of Girona. 9.Chen, Mei-Fang. (2004). A Study on the Willingness and Barriers of Teachers at Primary School Level by Participating e-Learning in Kaohsiung County, Graduate Institute of Adult Education Master Thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University 10.Casadesus-Masanell, R. & Ricart, J. E. (2011). How to design a winning business model, Harvard Business Review, 89 (1-2), 100-107. 11.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340. 12.Davis, F.D. & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model: Three Experiments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 45, pp.19-45. 13.Driscoll & Margaret (1998). How to plot web based training. Training and Development, Vol.52, Iss. 11, pp.46. 14.Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 15.Frezza, Bill (1998). It's time to examine your company's e-business model. Internet week, Issue 720, p42. 16.Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful Implementation of E-learning Pedagogical Considerations. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 287–299. 17.Hong, Rong-Zhao (2005). E-learning development and application. Taiwan Education Review, Vol. 631, 2-10. 18.Jackson, M. & A. Watts, (2002), The Evolution of Social and Economic Networks, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 106, pp. 265295. 19.Johnson, M. W. et al., (2008). Reinventing Your Business Model. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. 20.Konczal, E. F. (1975). Models are for managers, not mathematicians. Journal of Systems Management, 26(1), pp.12-15. 21.Kilby, T.(1999). WBT Advantages & Disadvantages. Retrieved from http://www.filename.com/wbt/pages/process.htm, 22.Linda L. Esterson(2001). E-Training takes over workplace education. Baltimore Business Journal, 12. 23.Liu, I., M. C. Chen, Y. S. Sun, D. Wible & C. H. Kuo (2010). Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors that Affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers & Education, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp.600-610. 24.Rappa, M. (1999). “Topic 5. Business Models on the web, Managing the digital enterprise, http://digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html 25.Merriam, S. B.(1988). Case study research in education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Jossey-Bass. 26.Mahadevan, B. (2000). Business Models for Internet-Based E-Commerce: An Anatomy, California management Review, 42, 4, Summer, pp.55-69. 27.Milton Zall (2001). Web-based training: A viable option? , Area Development Site & Facility Planning. Easton, Sept.. 28.Moon, J. W. & Y. G. Kim. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information and Management 38, no.4: 217-230. 29.MacGregor, C. & T. Whittingham (2001). E-learning for Industry: The Competitive Advantage, in Proceedings of Vocational Education and Training Research Conference, Deakin University, Geelong, July. 30.Magretta, Joan (2002). Why Business Models Matter, Harvard Business Review, May, pp.86-92. 31.Negroponte, N. (1991). Products and Services for Computer Networks. Scientific American 265 (3): 76–83. 32.O'Leary, Mick, (2000). Distance Learning and Libraries, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 94-966. 33.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, pp.1-43. 34.Ong, C. S., J. Y. Lai & Y. S. Wang (2004). Factors Affecting Engineers' Acceptance of Asynchronous E-learning Systems in High-tech Companies. Information & Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 795-804. 35.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, Wiley. 36.Rubin, Allen & Earl Babbie (1993). Research Methods for Social Work, Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, California. 37.Rimm, S. B. (1997). Underachievement syndrome: A national epidemic. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 416-434). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon. 38.Rosenberg, M.J. (2001). 「E-learning---Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age」, Vol. 53, No. 27, pp.141-146. New York, McGram-Hill, c2001. 39.Saltzberg, S., Polyson S.,(1995). Distributed Learning on the World Wide Web, Syllabus, Vol.9, No.1, pp.10-12. 40.Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85-92. 41.Stauffer, David (2001). Business the Cisco way : secrets of the company that makes the Internet, Capstone. 42.Saade, R. & B. Bahli (2005). The Impact of Cognitive Absorption on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use in On-line Learning: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 317-327. 43.Timmers, Paul (1998). “Business Models for Electronic Markets, EM — Electronic Markets, Vol.8 No.2, p.4 44.Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., & Alex Lowy (2000). Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs, Harvard Business Review Press. 45.Tsai, Peng-Hen (2002). A Study of Sixth Grade Elementary Student Learning Cube and Awl with Network Digital School, Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education Master Thesis, National Pingtung University of Education. 46.Urdan, Trace A & Cornelia C. Weggen (2000). Corporate E-learning: Exploring a New Frontier, San Francisco, CA:WR Hambrecht+Co., pp.8-9. 47.Waller, V., & Wilson, J, (2001). A definition for e-learning, The ODL QC Newsletter, pp.12. 48.Xu, D. & H. Wang (2006). Intelligent Agent Supported Personalization for Virtual Learning Environments. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 825-843. 49.Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 50.Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), pp.1019-1042.
|