企業動態決策能力與獨特性資源：策略性決策迴路觀點__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	企業動態決策能力與獨特性資源：策略性決策迴路觀點
作者：	陳志昕
作者(外文)：	Chen Chih-Hsi
校院名稱：	國立嘉義大學
系所名稱：	企業管理學系
指導教授：	侯嘉政
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2014
主題關鍵詞：	資源基礎觀點；動態能力；獨特性資源；動態策略性決策能力；系統動力學；決策循環迴路；resources-based view；dynamic capabilities；distinctive resources；dynamic strategic decision making capabilities；system dynamics；loop-based decision making
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:1

摘要
策略管理的研究已經有五十年的歲月，這一龐大且複雜的領域，已區分出兩大領域主流，一是大多數人所專注的策略內容(strategy content)，以及少數人所研究的另一主流，專注於策略過程(strategy process)。資源基礎觀點(RBV)及動態能力(DC)是策略管理研究兩個最核心的主軸。許多學者更是竭盡心力，根基於RBV與DC兩理論，以各種研究的主題，欲將兩理論加以延伸。
本研究從企業實務營運的策略決策角度出發，根據策略理論的策略流程主軸，在現今市場全球化及亂流般的劇烈環境變動下，因企業策略決策通常變得非常複雜，除了RBV及DC的理論外，應該如何建構在這兩大理論基礎下，更進一步描述或發現及探討那些因素，影響其策略流程，才可以適當描述卓越企業實務上的完整模式，以增添RBV與DC理論的可應用性，拉近與實務運作的實證價值。
本研究透過多重個案的深入訪談，分析所蒐集的資料發現，廠商在不同的市場動態性下，成功企業會以三種不同決策能力：調適型(adaptive)、深思型(interpretative)、即興創作型(improvisational)的動態策略性決策能力，掌握及整合獨特性資源(distinctive resources)，並隨時考慮決策相關各因子間的持續互動迴路影響，以系統動力學的概念，根據決策迴路調整修正，產生最適策略決策及績效。發展出「市場動態性→動態策略決策能力→獨特性資源→策略執行→決策迴路」的模式，以更貼近實務地，描述成功企業的策略經營之道。從五項觀念性架構議題討論，透過多重個案的複現邏輯，發展出增加策略管理流程中，DSDMC模式之探索性研究，透過這些議題的發現，可做為未來可以一般化實證研究的方向。
關鍵字：
資源基礎觀點、動態能力、獨特性資源、動態策略性決策能力、系統動力學、決策循環。

以文找文

Abstract
The field of strategy research is now about 50 years, in this large and complex field, there are two main streams have been split, strategy content has attracted more scholars attention and impacted both academy and practice substantially, the other strategy process has made much less impact comparatively.
Under current global turbulent business situation, the most challenging practice for managers is to deploy the necessary resources and make profit through the right strategic decision making. How to understand the essence of these successful strategies’ process under the approaches of resources-based view and dynamic capabilities theory would be a potential contribution to the strategy research and economics.
This dissertation aims to form a more comprehensive systematic structure of dynamic strategic decision making capabilities (DSDMC) in the strategy process study and for practical managerial application. By using multiple-case study, interviewed eleven listed-company-scale business top managers, studied their successful strategic decision process under dynamic market environment, to understand how they do in making the right decision in a fine-grained methodology. The result found there are three types of DSDMC are adopted in terms of varied environment, i.e. adaptive type, interpretative type, and improvisational type, which under the mediator of distinctive resources and complex process factors as system dynamics defined condition, a loop-based strategic decision making viewpoint been proposed along with other four conceptual issues which have been agreed with by collected evidences, which could be the hypothetic subjects for future further research to extend strategic decision making theory.
Key words：
Resources-based View, Dynamic Capabilities, Distinctive Resources, Dynamic Strategic Decision Making Capabilities, System Dynamics, Loop-based Decision Making.

以文找文

參考文獻
一、中文文獻

1. 司徒達賢(2001)，策略管理個案集。台北：智勝文化。 new window

2. 余雅文 (2003)，企業動態能力之探究與衡量。國立嘉義大學管理研究所，未出版之碩士論文。
3. 尚榮安譯 (2001)，個案研究法。台北：弘智文化。英文原作者(Yin R.), 書名：Case Study Research: Design and Methods.
4. 林靜宜(2008)，捷安特傳奇。台北：天下文化。
5. 高敬文 (1999)，質化研究方法論。台北：師大書苑。
6. 高淑清(2008)，質性研究的18堂課-首航初探之旅，高雄：麗文文化。
7. 高淑清(2008)，質性研究的18堂課-揚帆再訪之旅，高雄：麗文文化。
8. 侯嘉政 (2012)，策略群組理論之評論與未來研究之議題 – 動態能力觀點，嘉義大學討論稿。
9. 陳明哲(2010)，動態競爭。台北：智勝文化。
10. 張玉文 (2011)，實在的力量-鄭崇華與台達電的經營智慧, 清華大學出版社。
11. 張志堅 (2000)，動態能耐管理與競爭互動之研究，義守大學管理科學研究所，未出版之碩士論文。
12. 劉震濤、楊君苗、殷存毅、徐昆明(2006)，台商企業的中國經驗，台北：台灣培生。
13. 魏錫鈴 (2009)，騎上頂峰：捷安特與劉金標傳奇，台北：聯經出版。
14. 李茸，揚季，白希峰譯，James McGregor 原著 (2006), 與龍共舞，天下雜誌。

二、英文文獻
1. Akgun A., Byrne J., Lynn G., Heskin H., (2007), New Product Development in Turbulent Environments: Impact of Improvisation and Unlearning on New Product Performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24, 203-230. new window

2. Ali A. J. (2005), Bad management Theories: Mistaken Conclusion. Advance in Competitiveness Research. Vol. 13, No.1, 2005. new window

3. Ambrosini and Bowman (2009), What are Dynamic Capabilities and are They a Useful Construct in Strategic Management?. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 11, issues 1, 2009 Mar. new window

4. Ambrosini V.，Bowman C., Collier N. (2009), Dynamic Capabilities: An Exploration of How Firms Renew their Resource Base. British Journal of Management, 20, S9–S24.
5. Amit R. and Schoemaker P. (1993), Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 33-46.
6. Barney J. (2001), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. new window

7. Bell G., Bromiley P., Bryson J., (1997), Spinning a Complex Web: Links Between Strategic Decision Making Context, Content, Process and Outcome. Ch. 11 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science + Business Media New York.
8. Bianchi C. and Montemaggiore G. B. (2008), Enhancing Strategy Design and Planning in Public Utilities through “Dynamic” balanced scorecards: Insight from a Project in a City Water Company. System Dynamic Review Vol. 24, No. 2, (summer 2008): 175-213.
9. Bossidy L. and Charan R., (2002), Execution the discipline to get the things done. Audio-Tech Business Summaries. Vol. 11, No.8, Section 1. new window

10. Burgelman R. K. (1983), A Model of the Interaction of the Strategic Behavior, Corporate Context, and the Concept of Strategy. Academy of Management Review, 1983, vol. 8, No. 1, 61-70. new window

11. Carr C., (1997), Strategic Decision Making as Improvisation. Ch. 8 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
12. Cao G., Wiengarten F., Humphreys P. (2011), Towards a Contingency Resource-based View of IT Business Value. Systemic Practice and Action Research, Feb. 2011, Vol. 24, Issue 1, 85-106. new window

13. Costa P., Buede D, (2000), Dynamic Decision making: A Comparison of Approaches. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 9: 243-262.
14. Dean J., Sharfman M., (1996), Does Decision Process Matter ? A Study of Strategic Decision Making Effectiveness. Acadamy of Management Journal; Vol. 39, No. 2, 368-396.
15. Drazin R., Andrew H. &; Van D. V. (1985), Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 30, No.4, (Dec. 1985), pp. 514-539.
16. Eisenhardt K, (1997), Strategic Decision Making as Improvisation. Ch. 15 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
17. Eisenhardt K, Martin J. (2000), Dynamic Capabilities: What are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1221.
18. Ghoshal S. (2005), Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education. Vol. 4, No. 1, 75-91. new window

19. Gonzalez C., Lerch J., Lebiere C., (2003), Instance-Based Learning in Dynamic Decision Making. Cognitive Science. 27, 591-635.
20. Gopalakrishnan S. and Dugal M. (1998), Strategic Choice versus Environmental Determinism: A Debate Revisited. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 6, No.2, 146-164.
21. Gulati R. (1999), Network Location and Learning: The Influence of network Resources and Firm Capabilities of Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 397-420.
22. Helfat C., Peteraf M. (2003), The Dynamic Resource-based View: Capability Life Cycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 997-1010.
23. Helfat C.E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Singh H., Teece D. J., Winter S. G. (2007), Dynamic capabilities - Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Black well Publishing, Chapter 1. new window

24. Hitt M., Ireland R., (1985), Corporate Distinctive Competence, Strategy, Industry and Performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, 273-293.
25. Ho G.T.S., Choy K.L., Chung S.H. and Lam C.H.Y. (2010), An Examination of Strategies under the Financial Tsunami. Industrial Management &; Data, 110(9), 1319-1336.
26. Hsiao N, (2000), Exploration of Outcome Feedback for Dynamic Decision Making. A Dissertation for the Ph. D, State University of New York. Bell &; Howell Information and Learning Company.
27. Lee K., He X. (2009), The Capability of the Samsung Group in Project Execution and Vertical Integration: Created in Korea, Replicated in China. Asia Business &; Management Vol. 8, 3, 277-299.
28. Kim K, Park J., (2000), Integrating Distinctive Manufacturing Competence Globally: Its Effect on Business Performance. Multinational Business Revew; Spring 2000: 8. 1. new window

29. Kobashi T., Fujikawa N. (2009), A Research on Development of Inter-organizational Learning: Through the Case of an International Strategic Alliance. Journal of International Business Research, 8, SI. 2.
30. Langley P., and Simon H. (1981), The Central Role of Learning in Cognition, Ch. 12 of Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition – Model of Thought, Carnegie Mellon University.
31. Lavie D. (2007), Alliance Portfolios and Firm Performance: A Study of Value Creation and Appropriation in the U.S. Software Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1187-1212.
32. Leybourne S., Sadler-Smith E., (2006), The Role of Intuition and Improvisation in Project Management. International Journal of Porject Management 24, 483-492.
33. Lockett A, Thompson S. (2001), The Resource-based View and Economics. Journal of Management. 27: 723-754.
34. Lu Y., (1997), Strategic Decision Making as Improvisation. Ch. 9 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
35. Luo Y. (2003), Industrial Dynamics and Managerial Networking in an Emerging Market: The Case of China. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1315-1327.
36. Macgrath R., Macmallan I., Tushman M., (1992), The Role of Executive Team Actions in Shaping Dominant Designs: Towards the Strategic Shaping of Technological Progress. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, 137-161.
37. Macher J.T., Nowery D.C. (2009), Measuring Dynamic Capabilities: Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing. British Journal of Management, 20, S41-S62.
38. Magni M., Proserpio L., Hoegl M., Provera B., (2009), The Role of Team Behavioral Integration and Cohesion in Shaping Individual Improvisation. Research Policy 38, 1044-1053.
39. Mahoney J., Pandian R. (1992), The Resource-base View within the Conversation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 363-380.
40. Mauws M., (2000), But Is It Art? Decision Making and Discursive Resources in The Field of Cultural Production. The Journal of Apllied Behavioral Science; 36, 2, 229-243.
41. Merten P. P. (1991), Loop-based Strategic Decision Support Systems. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 371-386.
42. O’hare G., O’Grady M., Tynan R., Muldoon C., Kolar H., Ruzzelli A., Diamond D., Sweeney E., (2007), Embedding Intelligent Decision Making Within Complex Dynamic Environment. Artif Intell Rev, 27, 189-201.
43. Papadakis V., Barwise P., (1998), Strategic Decision. Springer Science + Business Media New York.
44. Penrose E. (1995), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press. Electronic Book 272 pages.
45. Powell T. (1996), How Much does Industry Matter? An Alternative Empirical Test. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 323 - 334.
46. Rajagopalan N., Rasheed A., Datta D., Spreitzer G., (1997), A Multi-Theoretic Model of Strategic Decision making Process. Ch. 14 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science + Business Media New York.
47. Ray G., Barney J., Muhanna W. (2004), Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependant Variables in Empirical Tests of The Resources-Based View. Strategic Management Journal 25: 23-37.
48. Roth K. &; Morrison A. (1990), An Empirical Analysis of the Integration Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries. Journal of International Business Studies: Forth Quarter 1990; 21, 4, 541.
49. Schultz F., (2001), Explaining the Link Between Strategic Decision Making and Organizational Performance: an Exploration of the Influence of Executive Decision-Making expertise and Environmental Turbulence. A Thesis of the Graduate School of The University of Minnesota, Bell &; Howell Information and Learning Co.
50. Shi X., Xia H.S., (2001), Model of Interactive Algorithm of Bi-Level Multi-Objective Decision-Making With Multiple Interconnected Decision Makers. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 10: 27-34.
51. Skraba A., Kljajic M., Borstnar M., (2007), The Role of Information Feedback in the Management Group Decision-Making Process Applying System Dynamics Models. Group Decision and Negotiation 16: 77-95.
52. Shrivastava P. and Grant J.H. (1985), Empirical Derived Models of Strategic Decision-Making Process. Strategic Management Journal Vol. 6, 97-113.
53. Simon H., Langley G., (1981), Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving. Answering Technique, Col. 47, No.1, 1-27. new window

54. Sirmon D., Hitt M.A., Ireland R. D. (2007), Managing Firm Resources In Dynamic Environment to create Value: Looking inside the Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32, No.1, 273-292. new window

55. Sterman J.D. (2004), Business Dynamics – Systems Thinking and Modeling for a complex World. Singapore: McGraw Hill Companies (Asia).
56. Takahashi N. (1997), A Single Garbage Can Model and The Degree of Anarchy in Japanese Firms. Human Relations. Vol. 50, No.1, 97-108. new window

57. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Sheun A. (1997), Dynamic Capability and Strategic Management. Strategic management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
58. Wang C., Ahmed P., (2007), Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of management Reviews. Vol. 9, 1, 31-51. new window

59. Williason (1991), Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, 75-94.
60. Winter S., (2003), Understanding Dynamic Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal. 24, 991-995.
61. Yamamoto M., (1997), Strategic Decision Making as Improvisation. Ch. 10 of Strategic Decisions. Springer Science+Business Media New York.
62. Yin R. (1994), Case Study Research – Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
63. Zott C. (2003), Dynamic capabilities and the Emergence of Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal 24: 97-125.

三.電子媒體資料
1. http://investor.apple.com new window

2. http://mops.twse.com.tw/index.htm 台灣證券交易所公開資訊觀測站。
3. http://www.deltaww.com T集團公司網站
4. http://www.electroiq.com/index.html
5. http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottdecarlo/2013/04/17/the-worlds-biggest- companies-2/
6. http://www.masterkong.com.cn/investor/ D集團公司網站
7. http://www.moneydj.com/kmdj/wiki/wikiviewer.aspx?keyid=7febea16-d275-473f-a929-1d800232ea12 (MoneyDJ 財經知識庫)
8. www.newwide.com/ N集團公司網站
9. www.yuanta.com.tw/post/files/9921.pdf 巨大機械工業股份有限公司2010年現金增資發行新股公開說明書-元大寶來證券。

四、專業報告
1. 彭德明與方耀為 (2010)。中央銀行國際金融參考資料第六十輯，1-26。 new window

2. L集團公司年報

五、其他媒體
1. Time Magazine, 2013-June-17, P. 27 new window

2. Forbes Business 2013-Apr-17

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	以資源基礎觀點探索組織轉捩策略及企業生命階段所賦予之情境效果

1.	從資源基礎觀點探討文創商品的可持續競爭優勢之研究：以台灣土鳳梨酥為例
2.	1
3.	基於持續性與利潤性觀點之企業知識資產分類架構

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫