:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專利判決書分類之研究-以美國上訴法院聯邦巡迴庭為例
作者:許文齡
作者(外文):Wen-Ling Hsu
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:企業管理系博士班
指導教授:耿筠
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2014
主題關鍵詞:專利判決書分析書目計量學引文分析Citation analysisBibliometricsPatent decision
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
在知識經濟的經營環境中,專利是影響高科技產業競爭發展的關鍵要素之一,台灣科技廠商已在全球占有一席之地,因而成為國外大廠商控告專利侵權的對象。在國際上智慧財產訴訟案件中,美國因其市場規模與專利訴訟的法院見解地位,成為最矚目的焦點。因此本研究認為有必要了解美國專利訴訟中各項爭訟的議題類型,透過展開完整的判決書網絡,了解關鍵判例與議題發展軌跡,將能有助於了解法院見解與相關管理實務的準備工作。本研究主要係透過Westlaw Internation蒐集美國聯邦巡迴上訴法院1982-2011年間共計 4,460 篇專利判決書,運用專利判決書引證的特性,建立判決書間的引證網絡關聯網,並進行爭訟議題之分類。研究結果發現共有169篇先例判決書於30年間被引證次數超過30次,透過判決書共被引分析法將其分為九大類,分別為:解釋申請範圍、均等論、缺乏非顯而易見性、手段功能用語、不正行為、損害賠償、缺乏新穎性、裁量錯誤與缺乏可實施性。本研究並參考Patent Law等專利法書籍,發現此九大類與近十年主要專利訴訟案件方向大致相同,顯示出以社會科學角度對判決書進行分類的結果與法學角度相同,確立本分類方法之可行性。
In the business environment of a knowledge-based economy, patents are a key factor that influences the competition and development of the high-tech industry. Taiwanese technology manufacturers, which are vital players in the global market, have been frequently accused by large foreign enterprises of patent infringement. Intellectual property lawsuits in the United States attract wide international attention because of the country’s market size and the prestige of its court opinions regarding patent lawsuits. Therefore, this study examined the types of issues involved in various litigations among U.S. patent lawsuits, and expanded complete patent decision networks to investigate key cases. This facilitates the understanding of U.S. court opinions and the preparations for relevant management practices. In addition, this study developed an analysis method by using a law database to collect 4,460 patent decisions issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit between 1982 and 2011. Results of this study will be divided into nine categories of “Claim Construction”, “Doctrine of equivalents”, ” Obviousness”, ” Means-plus-function”, “Inequitable conduct”, “Damages”, “Novelty”, ” Abuse of discretion” and “Lack of enablement”. Following classification, the litigation issues were confirmed by U.S. Patent Law to ensure that the classification method and logic used in this study possess practical validity.
王世仁,2007,讀美國判決學專利:案例導讀與分析,翰蘆圖書出版有限公司。

王正華、陳秀娟,2011,專利分析相關文獻關係與發展趨勢:採用引用文獻分析與社會網絡分析,科技管理學刊,16(4),42-77。

吳曉君,2003,建構半導體代工業專利分類支援系統:專利共同引用分析的觀點,國立雲林科技大學,博士論文

呂春嬌,2002,從分類理論看分類法未來的發展與趨勢,中國圖書館學會會報,69,176-199。

沈宗倫,2008,專利侵害均等論之過去、現在及未來-我國法應何去何從?,東吳法律學報,20(2),173-222。

孟連生,1996,試論引文索引法的性質與功能。資訊傳播與圖書館學,3(1),15-19。

侯猛,2008,法律引證的制度意義,社會科學研究,(2),94-97。

孫遠釗,2011,評臺灣面對國外專利侵權訴訟的對應策略-兼論政府參與「智慧財產基金」的可行性,政大智慧財產評論,137-173。

張啓聰,2011,美國程序專利法制之探討-以In re Bilski案為中心,東吳法律學報,22(3),149-186。

張善斌、林美蘭、賴奎魁、張淑敏,2007,再論專利分析相關文獻知分類研究,科技管理學刊,12(3),1-34。

陳光華、陳雅琦,2001,臺灣人文學引用文獻資料庫之建置,圖書館學與資訊科學,27(1),51-77。

馮震宇,2004,影響專利侵害認定的判決:從Festo判決看均等論的未來,載於智慧財產權發展趨勢與重要問題研究,81-91。

黃慕萱、蔣禮芸,2006,從專利引用網路探討我國資訊電子業公司研發領域之變遷,大學圖書館,10(1),2-29。

詹麗萍,2006,引文分析與電子期刊使用評鑑,數位時代圖書館館藏發展研討會論文集,265-278。

蔡明月,2005,引文索引與引文分析之探討,圖書館學與資訊科學,31(1),45-53。

蔡明月,2003,資訊計量學與文獻特性,國立編譯館,台北市。

賴奎魁、林美蘭、張淑敏、張善斌,2006,專利分析相關文獻之分類研究:採用書目計量學方法,科技管理學刊,11(1),137-148。

Adelman, M. J., Rader, R. R., and Thomas, J. R. (2009). “Case and Materials on PATENT LAW(Third Edition)”. West Academic Publishing.

Basberg, B.(1987). “Patents and the Measurement of Technological Change: A Survey of the Literature.” Research Policy, 16(2-4), 42-46.

Bastian Hanisch, and Andreas Wald (2012). “A Bibliometric View on the Use of Contingency Theory in Project Management Research.” Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4-23.

Baum, L. (2006). “ Judges and their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton.” N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Bayer A. E., Smart J. C., and McLaughlin G. W. (1990). “Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444-452.

Braam, R. R., Moed H. K., and Anthony F.J. van Raan. (1991). “Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. II: Dynamical Aspects.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 252-266.

Breitzman, A. F., and Mogee, M. E. (2002). “The many Applications of Patent Analysis.” Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 187-205.

Brooks, T. A. (1986). “Evidence of complex citer motivations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36.

Budd, J. M. (1988). “A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature.” Research in Higher Education, 28(2), 180-190.

Chisum D. S. (2004) Principles of Patent Law: cases and materials.

Collins Jr, Paul M. (2008). “The Consistency of Judicial Choice.” The Journal of Politics, 70 (3), 861-873

Columbia Law Review Association, the Harvard Law Review Association, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, and the Yale Law Journal. (2005). “THE BLUEBOOK: A Uniform System of Citation”, eighteenth edition, pp.3-45

Courtial, Callon & Sigogneau. (1993). “The Use of Patent Titles for Identifying the Topics of Invention and Forecasting Trends.” Scientometrics, 26 (2), 231-242.

Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). “Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science.” Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

Epstein L.,Jeffrey A. Segal and Timothy Johnson (1996). “The Claim of Issue Creation on the U.S. Supreme Court.” The American Political Science Review, 90 (4), 845-852

Francisco Jose Acedo , Carmen Barroso, Cristobal Casanueva, Jose Luis Galan (2006). “ Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis.” Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983.

Francisco Munoz-Leiva, Maria Isabel Viedma-del-Jesus, Juan Sanchez-Fernandez, Antonio Gabriel Lopez-Herrera (2012). “An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective.” Quality & Quantity, 46(4), 1077-1095.

Hoffman D. L., and Holbrook M. B.(1993). “The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometrics study of author co-citations in the first 15 years of the journal of consumer research.” Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 505-517.

James Bessen、Michael J. Meurer (2005). “Lessons for Patent Policy From Empirical Research on Patent Litigation.” Lewis & Clark Law Review, 9(1), 1-27.

Jennings, R. L., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling, A. (2008). “A bibliometric analysis of "school psychology international" 1995-2007.” School Psychology International, 29(5), 515-528.

Kenneth A. Heischmidta & Peter Gordona (1993). “Rating of Marketing Publications: Impact of Accreditation and Publication History.” Journal of Education for Business, 68(3), 152-158.

Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Yu, K. (2008). “Ten Years of Conflict Management Studies: Themes, Concepts, and Relationships.” International Journal of Conflict Management, 19(3), 234-248.

Mary J. Culnan, Charles A. O''Reilly, Jennifer A. Chatman (1990). “Intellectual Structure of Research in Organizational Behavior, 1972-1984: A Co-citation Analysis.” Journal of the American Society for Informaiton Science, 41(6), 453-458.

McMurtray, F. and J. M. Ginski. (1972). “Citation Patterns of the Cardiovascular Serial Literature.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23 (May/June), 174-175.

Moody J. (2004). “The structure of a social science collaboration network: disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999.” American Sociological Review, 69(2), 213-238.

Mueller, J. M. (2005). An Introduction to Patent Law. ASPEN publishers.

Narin, F. (1994). “Patent Bibliomatrics.” Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.

Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., and Natarajan, V. (2008). “The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis.” Strategic Management Journal, 29, 319-336.

Osareh, F. (1996). “Bibliometric, Citation Analysis and Co-Citation Analysis: A Review of Literature.” International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 46(3), 149-158.

Pavitt K. (1985). “Patent Statistics as Indicators of Innovative Activities: Possibilities and Problems.” Scientometric, 7(1-2), 77-99.

Pilkington, A. and Fitzgerald, R. (2006). “Operations Management Themes, Concepts and Relationships: A Forward Retrospective of the IJOPM.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 26(11), 1255-1275.

Reeves, B. and Borgman, C. (1982). “A Bibliometric Evaluation of Core Journals in Communication Research.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association.

Rob Robinsion (2011). “Activism, Attitudes, and the Citation of Precedent in Supreme Court Opinions.” Midwestern Political Science Association(Proceeding in Chicago)

Saeed Samiee & Brian R. Chabowski (2012). “Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 364-386.

Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A. and Sillanpaa, A. (2006). “Scholarly Communities in Entrepreneurship Research: A Co-Citation Analysis.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399-415.

Small H. (1973). “Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.

Smith, L. C. (1981). “Citation analysis.” Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.

Tsay M. Y. (2009). “An Analysis and Comparison of Scientometric Data between Journals of Physics, Chemistry and Engineering.” Scientometrics, 78(2), 279-293.

Tsuji, Y. S. (2001). “Product Development in the Japanese and US Printer Industries.” Technovation, 21(5), 325-332.

USPTO(2012) PTMT Special Report, All Patent, All Types-January 1987- December 2011.

Van Raan, A.F.J. (2003). “The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments Technikfolgenabschatzung.” Theorie und Praxis, 12 (1), 20-29

White H. D. and Griffith B. C. (1981). “Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.

White, H. D. and McCain, K.W. (1998). “Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science.” 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327-355.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE