郭生玉 （2004）。教育測驗與評量。 新北市: 精華書局。
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 508-600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Angoff, W. H. (1984). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Bennett, R. E., & Ward, W. C. (1993). Construction Versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Berk, R. A. (1986). A consumer’s guide to setting performance standards on criterion-referenced tests. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 137-172.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. (2010). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38(6), 635-657. doi: 10.1007/s11251-008-9091-4
Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6-28.Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209-222.Cizek, G. J. (1993). Reconsidering standards and criteria. Journal of Educational measurement, 30(2), 93-106.
Cizek, G. J. (2006). Standard setting. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 225-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard setting: A guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Ebel, R. L. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement (2rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Eckes, T. (2005). Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-facet Rasch analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(3), 197-221.
Eckes, T. (2009). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Reference supplement to the manual for relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment.
Giraud, G., Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (2005). Teachers' conceptions of the target examinee in Angoff standard setting. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(3), 223-232.
Hartley, J., & Trueman, M. (1983). The effects of headings in text on recall, search and retrieval. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(2), 205-214. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02551.x
Hartman, D. K., & Allison, J. (1996). Promoting inquiry-oriented discussions using multiple texts. In L. B. Gambrell & J. F. Almasi (Eds.), Lively Discussions! Fostering Engaged Reading (pp. 106-133). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (1997). Standard setting: An alternative approach. Journal of Educational measurement, 34(4), 353-366.
Jaeger, R. M. (1982). An iterative structured judgment process for establishing standards on competency tests: Theory and application. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, 461-475.
Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1999). Modifying mental representations: Comprehending corrections. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 303-318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 425-461.
Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., LSA Research Group, L. R. G., Matthews, C., & Lamb, R. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8(2), 87-109.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological review, 95(2), 163-182.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Modeling comprehension processes: The construction-integration model. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition (pp. 93-120). New York: Cambridge university press.
Knoch, U., Read, J., & von Randow, J. (2007). Re-training writing raters online: How does it compare with face-to-face training? Assessing Writing, 12(1), 26-43. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.001Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1983). The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.
León, J. A., & Carretero, M. (1995). Intervention in comprehension and memory strategies: Knowledge and use of text structure. Learning and instruction, 5(3), 203-220.
Lewis, D. M., Mitzel, H. C., & Green, D. R. (1996). Standard setting: A bookmark approach. Paper presented at the the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large Scale Assessment, Boulder, CO.
Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
Livingston, S. A., & Zieky, M. J. (1989). A comparative study of standard-setting methods. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(2), 121-141.
Loomis, S. C. (2000). Feedback in the NAEP Achievement Levels Setting Process. Paper presented at the the meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, New Orleans.
Loomis, S. C., & Bourque, M. L. (2001). From tradition to innovation: Standard setting on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Standard setting: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 175-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mitzel, H. C., Lewis, D. M., Patz, R. J., & Green, D. R. (2001). The bookmark procedure: Psychological perspectives. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting Performance Standards: Concepts, Methods, and Perspectives (pp. 249-281). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nedelsky, L. (1954). Absolute grading standards for objective tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 14, 3-19.
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and instruction, 1(2), 117-175.Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. vanOostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99-122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reckase, M. D. (2000a). The ACT NAGB Standard Setting Process: How "Modified" Does It Have To Be before It Is No Longer a Modified-Angoff Process? S.l.: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
Reckase, M. D. (2000b). The Evolution of the NAEP Achievement Levels Setting Process: A Summary of the Research and Development Efforts Conducted by ACT. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing, Inc.
Reckase, M. D. (2013). Innovative methods for helping standard-setting participants to perform their task: The role of feedback regarding consistency, accuracy, and impact. Setting Performance Standards: Theory and Applications, 159.
Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, lnc.
Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478.
Rouet, J.-F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A. B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of Information Search Tasks on the Comprehension of Instructional Text. Discourse processes, 31(2), 163-186. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3102_03
Royer, J. M., Carlo, M. S., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. (1996). The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading. Cognition and instruction, 14(3), 373-408.
Schwarz, B. (2003). Collective reading of multiple texts in argumentative activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 133-151. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00077-6
Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students' misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and instruction, 13(3), 373-400.
Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (2004). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R. B. Ruddel & N. J. U. (Eds.) (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.)(pp. 640-653). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Valenti, S., Neri, F., & Cucchiarelli, A. (2003). An overview of current research on automated essay grading. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2(1), 319-330.van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. A. Balota, G. B. F. d'Arcais & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423-445). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents' text processing and reasoning. Cognition and instruction, 23(4), 467-502.