:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標之研究
作者:于承平
作者(外文):Yu, Cheng-Ping
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育學系
指導教授:胡茹萍
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標認可制評鑑higher technical and vocational educationquality assuranceindicatoraccreditation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
自從技專校院辦理綜合評鑑以來,業已達成評等優劣、發掘問題、導引方向、督促改進及輔導建議等功能,但仍存在著評鑑標準一致化、限制各校特色發展、學校爭取評鑑成績導致資源錯置等問題。故為強化評鑑優點並改善不足之處,進一步採行認可制評鑑;但如何使該項政策推動更為精進,並納入品質保證作法,值得進一步探討與改進。本研究以文獻分析,釐清認可制評鑑及品質保證關係,明確凸顯問題分析重點,並分別就澳洲及歐盟技職教育學制發展、縱向機關層級政策推動及橫向時間發展脈絡分析,呈現分析對象完整全貌,進而根據研究分析結果,提出我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標初步概念架構。
其次,運用專家訪談、專家效度問卷、模糊德懷術問卷及層級分析法進行57人/次學者專家訪談及調查分析,完成建構我國高級技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構及權重體系,並就研究結論分項說明如下:
一、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構包含4項構面、20項主指標及76項次指標,均具適切性。
二、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構整體構面權重分配由高而低依序為「輸入構面」、「成果構面」、「學習轉化構面」及「基礎構面」。
三、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構「基礎構面」以「1-1政策法令」主指標權重較高,「1-1-1校務推動符合大學法及其他相關辦法規定」次指標權重較高。
四、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構「輸入構面」以「2-1學校定位」主指標權重較高,「2-1-1學校及系科定位有明確特色對應產業」次指標權重較高。
五、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構「學習轉化構面」以「3-4教師專業發展」主指標權重較高,「3-4-1學校教師具備任教領域相關之業界實務經驗」次指標權重較高。
六、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構「成果構面」以「4-1學習成效」主指標權重較高,「4-1-1學生學習成效均達成學校訂定畢業條件要求」次指標權重較高。
七、 我國高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構之質性專家訪談與量化分析結果均具一致性。
最後,依據文獻探討及專家訪談結果,配合最後研究結果與討論,分別提出相關建議,供主管機關、科技校院及未來後續研究之參考。
Ever since the comprehensive evaluation system was implemented for technical and vocational colleges and universities in Taiwan, it has functioned in better discrimination between schools; discovery of existing problems, guidance of future directions, better supervision for schools to make improvements, and offer of consultations and suggestions. Nonetheless, there remain problems such as homogeneity of evaluative standard that limit schools to develop their own special characteristics, the solely concerns of schools to achieve better evaluative that result in displacements of school resources. Accreditation was subsequently implemented in order to maintain merits of current evaluative system and improve upon its loopholes. Nevertheless, how to further polish that policy and incorporate Quality Assurance into its mechanism is little explored and thus addressed in this paper.
By employing literature review as a means to delineate the relationships between accreditation and quality assurance, and further highlight points of problems during analysis. This study analyzes respective developments of TVE (Technological and Vocational Education) Systems within both Australia and European Union, in order to explore how policies are implemented within vertical hierarchy of institutions, and how theses have evolved over horizontal time pattern, so that present the whole picture of each evaluation system. This study eventually contributes to providence of a conceptual framework of quality assurance indicators for technical and vocational education in Taiwan.
Furthermore, through adapting in-depth interviews, expert validation questionnaire, fuzzy Delphi technique questionnaire, and hierarchical analysis, this study also conducted 57 persons/times interviews with scholars and professionals, and made surveillances and analyses thereafter, by which completed the construction of framework and weighting system of quality assurance for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan, the conclusions are as follows:
1. The current quality framework of assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education that comprise four dimensions, 20 primary indicators and 76 sub-indicators are appropriate.
2. The comprehensive weighting priorities of framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan sequence from high to low are as follows: "Input Dimension", "Outcome Dimension", "Dimension of Learning Transformation" and "Fundamental Dimension".
3. With regards to ‘Fundamental Dimension’ of framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan, the main indicator "1-1 Policies and Laws" occupies higher weight; and sub-indicator "1-1-1 Promote School Affairs in Compliance with the University Act and other Relevant Provisions" occupies higher weight.
4. With regards to ‘Input Dimension’ of framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan, the main indicator "2-1 Positioning of Schools" occupies higher weight; and sub-indicator "2-1-1 Positioning Schools and Faculties to have Clear Corresponding Industries with Special Characteristics" occupies higher weight.
5. With regards to ‘Dimension of Learning Transformation’ of framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan, the main indicator "3-4 Professional Development of Teachers” occupies higher weight; and sub-indicator "3-4-1 School Teachers have Professional Experiences relevant to Teaching Subjects" occupies higher weight.
6. With regards to "Outcome Dimension" of framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan, the main indicator "4-1 Learning Effectiveness" occupies higher weight; and sub-indicator “4-1-1 Learning Outcomes of Students that Match Graduate Requirements of Each School" occupies higher weight.
7. There shows a consistency between ‘Qualitative Interviews with Experts’ and ‘Results of Quantitative Analysis’ in the framework of quality assurance indicators for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan.
Finally, in accordance with results of literature reviews, in-depth interviews, final research results and other discussions above, this study proposes several suggestions for the reference of related authorities, universities, colleges of science and following researches.
一、中文文獻
王令宜(2011)。我國高等教育品質保證體系建構之研究(未出版博士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
王令宜、吳清山(2010)。我國推動高等教育品質保證系統之探究。教育資料集刊,48,1-18。
王保進(2006)。以品質保證為目標的美國高等教育認可制度。評鑑雙月刊,2,47-50。
王湘栗(2009)。教育政策行銷模式建構之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
全國法規資料庫(2006)。職業訓練機構設立及管理辦法。臺北市:勞動部。
全國法規資料庫(2011)。大學法。臺北市:教育部。
全國法規資料庫(2013)。大學評鑑辦法。臺北市:教育部。
全國法規資料庫(2015)。技術及職業教育法。臺北市:教育部。
行政院主計總處(2013)。就業、失業統計。臺北市:作者。擷取自http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/31228311071.pdf
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2012)。101年度訓練品質評核系統實施計畫國際參訪活動觀摩實錄報告。臺北市:作者。
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2013)。職能導向課程品質認證作業規範(草案)。臺北市:作者。
行政院經濟建設委員會(2012)。經濟動能提升方案。臺北市:作者。擷取自http://www.cepd.gov.tw/att/0017595/0017595_9.pdf
吳宗立(2007)。教育品質:學校經營的挑戰。教育研究月刊,160,17-29。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2012)。SPSS與統計應用分析(二版)。臺北市:五南。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(原作者:M.Q.Patton)。臺北市:桂冠(原著出版年:1990)。
吳思達、王湧泉、劉彥慧(2010年1月)。訓練品質系統評核指標之研究—以國家訓練品質系統(TTQS)為例。就業問題與政策相關議題。2010年金融海嘯下人力資源管理之挑戰-論壇與學術研討會,中華人力資源發展學會。
吳政達(2008)。教育政策分析-概念、方法與應用。臺北市:高等教育。
吳清山(2001)。教育發展研究。臺北市:元照。
吳清山、王令宜(2008)。從認可制評鑑走向品質保證。評鑑雙月刊,16,9-12。
吳清山、林天祐(2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
技專校院評鑑資訊網(2011)。下一輪科技大學(技術學院)評鑑指標規劃說明。臺北市:社團法人臺灣評鑑協會。http://tve-eval.twaea.org.tw/NewsFile/下一輪技專校院評鑑指標規劃說明(精簡版-2)1000217.doc
技專校院評鑑資訊網(2013)。103-107學年度科技大學(104-108學年度技術學院)評鑑指標公告版。臺北市:社團法人臺灣評鑑協會。擷取自 http://tve-eval.twaea.org.tw/NewsFile/103-107學年度科技大學(104-108學年度技術學院)評鑑指標公告版1020403.doc
李俊湖(2009)。教育品質與管控機制。研習資訊雙月刊,26(6),1-2。
李政翰(2006)。教育指標建構對教育發展重要性之探討。研習資訊,23(5),107-110。
李麗君(2014)。我國大學推動學習成果本位評量的現況與挑戰。高教評鑑與發展,8(1),41-71。
辛炳隆、吳秀玲(2002)。對當前臺灣失業問題之因應對策。臺北市:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
孟克培(2011)。澳大利亞高等教育的學習成效。評鑑雙月刊,34,46-51。
林思伶、王如哲(2014)。臺灣高等教育再出發-高等教育改革:回顧與展望。教育研究月刊,245,64-75。
林倖妃(2012)。能力紮根:從學校到職場。2012年天下教育特刊,511,92-97。
武曉霞(2014)。國民中小學校長專業標準建構之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
姚立德(2014)。臺北科技大學實施認可制評鑑經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊,51,15-20。
胡幼慧(1998)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。臺北市:巨流。
胡茹萍(2004)。我國職業繼續教育之理論建構與制度規劃(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
胡茹萍(2014)。臺灣技術及職業教育法芻議。臺灣教育,685,8-20。
孫仲山、王明政(2011)。澳洲的職業教育與訓練。就業安全半年刊,100(1)。擷取自http://www2.evta.gov.tw/safe/docs/safe95/userplane/half_year_display.asp?menu_id=3&;submenu_id=511&;ap_id=1303
孫志麟(2000)。國民教育指標體系建構之研究。國立臺北師範學院學報,13,121-148。
徐昌慧(2008)。澳洲技職教育與訓練之品質保證機制。評鑑雙月刊,16,35-38。
張一蕃(2014a)。以「職能導向學位課程認證」協助技專校院發展特色。評鑑雙月刊,50,47-49。
張一蕃(2014b)。再論職能導向學位課程認證。評鑑雙月刊,51,36-38。
張心怡(2012)。政策論述2:回歸自我改進本質-技專校院評鑑改採認可制。高教技職簡訊第67期電子報。擷取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/pages_d.php?fn=topic&;id=113
張基成、蔡政緯(2013)。以網路模糊德懷術與層級分析法發展數位化學習歷程檔案之知識管理行為量表。教育資料與圖書館學,50(1),103-133。
張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及統計。臺北市:五南。
張瑞觀、葉峻賓及陳啟榮(2011)。未來學校競爭力指標建構之研究。教育行政論壇,3(1),175-211。
教育部(2009)。大學自我評鑑結果及國內外專業評鑑機構認可要點。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2013a)。「人才培育白皮書專案計畫」。立法院第8屆第3會期教育及文化委員會第16次全體委員會議書面報告。
教育部(2013b)。教育部試辦認定技專校院自我評鑑結果審查作業原則。臺北市:作者。
教育部(2013c)。澳洲高等教育機構參考名冊。臺北市:作者。
教育部技術及職業教育司(2014)。公私立技專校院一覽表。桃園市:健行科技大學。
梁琍玲(2013)。澳洲資歷架構在終身學習的應用及其對我國的意涵。高等教育,8(2),115-158。
許士軍(2013)。談人才培育的策略性供需調適機制。TTQS電子專刊,1,8-11。
郭生玉(2005)。心理與教育研究法。臺北市:精華。
陳勁甫、徐強及許桂溶(2009)。層級分析法成對比較基礎標度系統之研究。管理與系統,16(2),201-218。
陳振遠(2012)。發展自我特色,善用技專評鑑認可新制。高教技職簡訊電子報,67。擷取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/pages_d.php?fn=forum&;id=130
陳舜田(2014)。談技專校院認可制評鑑指標。評鑑雙月刊,51,5-10。
傅勝利(2014)。技專校院認可制評鑑的定位與精神。評鑑雙月刊,51,11-14。
勞動部(2014)。促進青年就業方案(103-105年)(核定本)。臺北市:作者。
勞動部勞動力發展署(2014a)。103年TTQS訓練品質評核表-訓練機構版。臺北市:作者。
勞動部勞動力發展署(2014b)。職能發展及應用推動要點。臺北市:作者。
馮清皇(2008)。國民小學教育政策執行力指標建構之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃宗昊(2010)。歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構。問題與研究,49(3),145-176。
黃俐文(2012)。澳洲職能制度介紹。就業安全半年刊,101(2),27-32。
楊思偉、陳盛賢(2007)。日本高等教育評鑑制度。臺北市:臺灣評鑑協會。
楊國賜(2014)。提升我國大學生就業力的策略。臺灣教育,685,2-7。
廖佳玲(2011)。芬蘭與臺灣高等教育品質保證制度之比較研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
趙志揚、吳金蓮及陳高生(2013)。日本技職教育體系人力供給之現況及其義蘊。教育資料集刊,59,27-62。
劉秀曦(2009)。我國大學品質保證與競爭經費關連性之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
劉孟奇(2012)。借鏡AQTF-職能本位的課程品保機制。高教技職簡訊第67期電子報。擷取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/pages_d.php?fn=forum&;id=52
劉純良(2010)。專業學會的研究倫理規範與實踐:以英美的社會行為科學為例。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),40-47。
蔡政緯(2012)。以網路模糊德懷術及層級分析法發展大學生網路化學習歷程檔案之知識管理行為量表(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
蔡錫濤(2013)。澳洲訓練品質管理制度之借鏡。訓練品質系統電子專刊,3。擷取自 http://ttqs.evta.gov.tw/EDocs/2013003.pdf
鄧之卿(2009)。跨國餐旅觀光休閒學門品質評量工具之研究(未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
鄧志平、楊育儀、劉淑慧、王智宏及盧怡任(2014)。以O*NET職業資料建構三層次職能架構:兼顧職涯訓練和生涯輔導需求的可跨職業之職能架構。輔導季刊,50(4),39-49。
駐澳大利亞代表處教育組(2012)。澳洲職業教育與訓練制度。教育部電子報,538。擷取自http://epaper.edu.tw/print.aspx?print_type=windows&;print_sn=11451&;print_num=538
蕭玉真(2013)。政策論述:打造實用技職。高教技職簡訊電子報,67。擷取自http://www.news.high.edu.tw/pages_d.php?fn=topic&;id=347
蕭錫錡(2008)。澳洲國家職能標準制度。臺北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
戴華、甘偵蓉及鄭育萍(2010)。人文社會科學與研究倫理審查-執行研究倫理治理架構計畫的考察與反思。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(1),10-18。
蘇宗明(2010)。ISO9001:2008國際標準品質管理基本原則之理論探討。臺北市:BSI英國標準協會。擷取自http://www.bsigroup.tw/upload/eNews/No78/ISO9001.pdf
蘇錦麗(2008)。美國認可制之自願性高等教育品質保證機制。評鑑雙月刊,16,13-16。

二、英文文獻
Adler, M., &; Ziglio, E.(1996). Gazing into the oracle : The Delphi techniques and its application to social policy and public health. London : Jessica Kingsley.
Australian Government ComLaw(2011a). National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2011A00012
Australian Government ComLaw(2011b). Standards for NVR Registered Training Organisations 2011. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01356
Australian Government ComLaw(2011c). Fit and Proper Person Requirements 2011. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01341
Australian Government ComLaw(2011d). Financial Viability Risk Assessment Requirements 2011. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01405
Australian Government ComLaw(2011e). Data Provision Requirements 2011. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2011L01342
Australian Qualifications Framework Council(2013). Australian Qualifications Framework – Second Edition January 2013. Retrieved from http://www.aqf.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/AQF-2nd-Edition-January-2013.pdf
Australian Skills Quality Authority(ASQA)(2010). AQTF Essential Conditions and Standards for Initial Registration : SELF ASSESSMENT. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/69386/AQTF_Essential_Conditions_and_Standards_for_Initial_Registration_-_Self_Assessment_Checklist_for_Applicants.pdf
Australian Skills Quality Authority(ASQA)(2013). Essential Conditions and Standards for initial Registration. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/69330/AQTF_Essential_Conditions_and_Standards_for_Initial_Registration_-_publication_July_2013.pdf
Australian Skills Quality Authority(ASQA)(2014). The VET Quality Framework. Retrieved from http://www.asqa.gov.au/vet-registration/understand-the-requirements-for-registration/the-vet-quality-framework.html#standards
Blom, K., Meyers, D.(2003). Quality indicators in vocational education and training : International perspectives. Australia : National Centre for Vocational Education Research. Retrieved from http://www.ncver.edu.au/popups/limit_download.php?file=research/proj/nr0026.pdf
Cedefop (1996). Quality issues and trends in vocational education and training in Europe. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/quality-issues-and-trends-in-vocational-education-and-training-in-europe-pbHX9896647/downloads/HX-98-96-647-EN-C/HX9896647ENC_001.pdf?FileName=HX9896647ENC_001.pdf&;SKU=HX9896647ENC_PDF&;CatalogueNumber=HX-98-96-647-EN-C
Cedefop (2009). The relationship between quality assurance and VET certification in EU Member States. Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/Files/5196_EN.PDF
Cedefop (2011). Assuring quality in vocational education and training : The role of accrediting VET providers. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/3061_en.pdf
Cedefop (2013). Quality Assurance in VET and Higher Education for improving their permeability. Retrieved from http://www.eqavet.nl/uploads/eqavet/bjieenkomsten/Oct2013-Draft%20briefing%20paper%20call%20for%20nominations.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia (2007). AQTF 2007 : Standards for Accredited Courses. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/69341/AQTF_2007_Standards_for_Accredited_Courses.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia (2008a). AQTF 2007 : Learner Survey Guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/67518/AQTF_LearnerSurveyGuide.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia (2008b). AQTF 2007 : Employer Survey Guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/67518/AQTF_LearnerSurveyGuide.pdf
Commonwealth of Australia (2008c). AQTF 2007 : Competency Completion Online System Guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/67523/AQTF-CompetencyCompletionOSGuide3.pdf
Dongtao, Q. I. (2012). Taiwan’s talent deficit crisis. EAI Background Brief No. 710. Singapore: East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.eai.nus.edu.sg/BB710.pdf
Education and Culture DG (2009). European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training. Brussels, Belgium : Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from http://www.eqavet.eu/Libraries/Policy_Documents_2009/European_Quality_Assurance_Reference_Framework_brochure.sflb.ashx?download=true
Education and culture DG (2013). EQAVET implementation : “A European goal to be achieved through national approaches” Brussels, Belgium : Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Retrieved from http://www.eqavetprojects.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Brochure-ExperiencesWEB.pdf
ENQA-VET (2009). Developing guidelines for supporting quality assurance in VET systems. Retrieved from http://www.deqa-vet.de/_media/PDF_allgemein/TG_Report_Developing_guidelines.pdf
EQAVET (2011). European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training – a tool for VET providers. Retrieved from http://www.evta.net/website_docs/brochure_2011_en.pdf
EQAVET (2012). Building a quality assurance approach in line with the EQAVET – guidelines for VET providers. Retrieved from http://www.eqavet.eu/Libraries/Building_Blocks_brochure/Building_Blocks_brochure_-_English.sflb.ashx?download=true
European Association for Quality Assurance (ENQA)(2009). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Aera. Finland : Helsinki.
European Commission (EC)(2008). Proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of a European quality assurance reference framework for vocational education and training.. Brussels, Belgium : Commission of The European Communities. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0179:FIN:EN:pdf
European Commission (EC)(2012a). Rethinking Education : Investing in skills for better socio-economic outcomes. Strasbourg : France. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/news/rethinking/com669_en.pdf
European Commission (EC)(2012b). Vocational education and training for better skill, growth and job. Strasbourg : France. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/news/rethinking/sw375_en.pdf
European Communities (2009). Vocational Education and Training (VET) Europe : A policy overview. Netherlands : European Commission’s Education and Culture DG. Retrieved from http://www.na-lll.nl/documenten-1/Vocational%20Education%20and%20Training%20(VET)%20Europe.pdf
European Parliament and Council (2008). Recommendation of The European Parliament and of The Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 111, 1-7.
European Parliament and Council (2009). Recommendation of The European Parliament and of The Council of 18 June 2009 on the establishment of a European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training. Official Journal of the European Union, 155, 1-10.
Kazantzidou, N.(2012). Overview of EQAVET. Piraeus : Greece Retrieved from http://www.bequalplus.info/documents/Overview%20of%20EQAVET.pdf
Mortaki, S.(2012). The Contribution of Vocational Education and Training in the Preservation and Diffusion of Cultural Heritage in Greece : The Case of the Specialty “Guardian of Museums and Archaeological Sites”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(24), 51-58.
Shmavonian, K. (2012). Taiwan becomes more competitive as wages go down. Forbes Asia. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesasia/2012/10/24/taiwan-becomes-more-competitive-as-wages-go-down/
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012). Charting international labor comparisons (2012 edition). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/fls/chartbook/2012/chartbook2012.pdf
UNESCO (2005). Normative instruments concerning Technical and Vocational Education. Paris : UNESCO, Section for Technical and Vocational Education. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001406/140603e.pdf
UNESCO (2007). Quality Assurance and Accreditation : A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001346/134621e.pdf
Volmari, K., Helakorpi, S. &; Frimodt, R. (Eds.)(2009). Competence Framework for VET Professions : handbook for practitioners. Sastamala : Finnish National Board of Education and editors. Retrieved from http://www.capival.eu/attachments/article/105/111332_Competence_framework_for_VET_professions.pdf

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE