觸覺風格與意象__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	觸覺風格與意象
作者：	陳勇廷
作者(外文)：	Chen, Yung-Ting
校院名稱：	國立交通大學
系所名稱：	應用藝術研究所
指導教授：	莊明振
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2016
主題關鍵詞：	觸覺風格與意象；訪談法；語意差異法；因子分析；集群分析；SEM結構方程模式；tactile style and image；interviews；semantic differential method；factor analysis；factor analysis；structural equation modeling
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:0

透過觸覺感受，人們得以深刻地感知生活周遭的事物，並建立感官經驗，特別是有關產品的使用與所接觸的材料質感。本研究以三個階段的調查與實驗逐步探討人的觸覺感受特性與表達方式、具代表性的產品設計風格、設計風格的感受意象、風格的代表刺激及刺激項目的物理特徵屬性等，以建立人的觸覺風格。而研究最終目的在探討與調查觸覺風格與其感受意象所對應的觸覺物理特徵之關係，以此建構出觸覺風格的整體架構。
研究探討首先於階段一中，透過文獻探討與前測匯整相關資料與建構訪談工具，以焦點訪談進行6位盲人與5位觸覺敏銳之視覺正常者的訪談調查。訪談過程提供51種不同物理特徵的觸覺刺激樣本，在排除視覺的條件下，進行提供觸覺刺激的訪談以獲得廣泛的感受表達語彙。結果以Krippendorff所提出的五種感官經驗描述類別進行分類整理，各類別以KJ法進行內容的整理與歸納。最終建構出人的觸覺感受意象表達語彙清單與觸覺刺激樣本清單。
於階段二中進行11位專家的訪談調查，收集與彙整感受表現強烈的產品設計風格，並以KJ法進行內容分群整併，建構出後續實驗評估所需的刺激與量尺。其結果與第一階段的成果彙整，獲得12項代表性風格概念、35個代表性產品與37個代表性材料樣本，以及21對可用以評估跨感官意象的感受語彙對。接著，進行45位受測者（15位具有設計背景、15位無設計背景以及15位盲人受測者）的語意差異法（semantic differential method）評估。實驗以七點量尺進行三種刺激的SD評估：1)風格概念評估；2)風格的代表產品圖片的視覺評估；3)代表性材料樣本的觸覺評估。彙整評估數據後，以因子分析與集群分析整理出7種具代表性的觸覺風格，各風格皆有對應的感受意象與刺激樣本。
最後於階段三中匯整階段二所獲得之研究成果，進行觸覺刺激樣本之形態分析，獲得3客觀量測與7項主觀判定的物理特徵數值。以此物理特徵與觸覺感受因子與感受意象，進行感性工學的分析。本階段以相關分析、SEM結構方程模型分析，建構出觸覺風格中其與意象所對應的觸覺物理特徵屬性。
本研究結果可建立觸覺風格與意象的基礎架構，各階段的研究成果，可作為未來進行相關觸覺研究的參考。對設計師而言，本研究於材料、質感與感受之間的相關性，可協助設計師於產品設計時，作為選用合適材質與材料的參考，以營造對應的觸覺感受。

以文找文

Through the tactile sensation, people can perceive objects around their everyday life and build their sensory experience about using and textile on a product. This study conducted three-step survey and experiment to explore the tactile style and image.
In this study, we firstly conducted focus interview. Six blind and 5 normal interviewees were recruited in the interview. In each interview session, the interviewee was guided and encouraged by the interviewer to exhaustedly describe his/her tactile feeling on freely touching the reference samples only, without the aid of vision. This study also collected 51 samples of various textures, based on literature review and pilot study, to be used as stimuli reference in the interview to evoke interviewees’ tactile feeling and experience. Finally, we constructed a list of tactile vocabularies and samples as reference in next step experiment.
And then, we conducted interview on 11 design experts for identifying visually distinct design styles of product as references for tactile styles. Seven design styles were identified. The descriptions on design styles of design experts were then coded and sorted by the KJ method to result a set of 28 pairs of Image words as evaluating scale for semantic differential (SD) evaluation. Those findings integrated the results from first step then this study obtained 12 styles and 21 image pairs as evaluation stimuli and scales. These design experts were also asked to figure out representative products for each design style. Thirty five representative products, 5 products for each of 7 styles, were summarized. These representative products were prepared as visual stimuli of pictures. A comprehensive set of 37 material samples were also prepared as tactile stimuli. Finally, 45 subjects were recruited for a SD survey by using a 7-point scale to evaluate three sets of stimuli: concept of 12 styles by thinking, 35 product pictures by seeing and 37 tactile samples by touching, on each of the 21 Image scales. The data collected in the SD survey were analyzed by using factor analysis and cluster analysis.
Finally, we used structural equation modeling analysis to figure out the correlation between physical properties and tactile images and construct the model of tactile style and image.
The result of the investigation can help researchers to further understand the tactile style and to treat it as a useful reference for relative studies, while it can help designers to design products with demanded tactile feeling.

以文找文

英文文獻
1. Ackerman, D. (1990). A natural history of the senses. New York: Random House.
2. Albus, V., Gros, J., & Thun, M. (1989). Design Now: Industry or Art? (Fischer, V. Ed.): Prestel Pub; illustrated edition edition.
3. Atkin, R. H. (1974). Mathematical structure in human affairs. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
4. Bargh, J. A., Williams, L. E., Huanga, J. Y., Song, H., & Ackerman, J. M. (2010). From the physical to the psychological: Mundane experiences influence social judgment and interpersonal behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 267- 268.
5. Basdogan, C., Ho, C. H., & Srinivasan, M. (2001). An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(4), 443-460.
6. Baumgartner, E., Wiebel, C. B. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2015). A comparison of haptic material perception in blind and sighted individuals. Vision Research, 115(Part B), 238–245.
7. Berger, A. A. (1989). Seeing is believing: An introduction to visual communication. Mountain View, California: Mayfield pub.
8. Bhaskaran, L. (2005). Designs of the times: Using key movements and styles for contemporary design. UK: RotoVision Press.
9. Bolanowski, S. J., Verrillo, R.T. & McGlone, F. (2004). Passive, active and intra-active (self) touch. Behavioral Brain Research, 148, 41-45.
10. Boulding, K. E. (1956). The image: Knowledge in life and society. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Brave, S., & Dahley, A. (1997). In Touch: A Medium for Haptic Interpersonal Communication. Paper presented at the Proceedings of CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing, ACM Press (1997), 363-364.
12. Breckler, S. J., & Wiggins, E. C. (1991). Cognitive responses in persuasion: Affective and evaluative determinants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 180-200.
13. Bruner, J. S. (1975). From communication to language - a psychological perspective. Cognition, 3(3), 255-287.
14. Butter, R. (1990). The practical side of a theory: An approach to the application of product semantics. In S. Vakeva (Ed.), Paper presented at the Proceedings from the Products Semantics '89 Conference, at the University of Industrial Arts Helsinki UIAH, Helsinki, Finland, pp.b1-b17.
15. Chan, C. S. (1994). Operational definitions of style. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(2), 223-246.
16. Chen, K. S. (1997). Style recognition and description. Journal of Design, 2(2), 123-143.
17. Chen, Y. T. & Chuang, M C. (2014). The study of tactile feeling and it's expressing vocabulary. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(5), 675-684.
18. Choi, K. M, & Jun, C. R. (2007). A systematic approach to the Kansei factors of tactile sense regarding the surface roughness. Applied Ergonomics, 38(1), 53–63.
19. Chuang, M. C., Chang, Y. J. & Chen, Y. T. (2011). A study on tactile image of products - Using handleless cups as a case study. Paper presented at the In IASDR the International Association of Societies of Design Research., Netherlands.
20. Collins, H. (2003). Collins COBUILD advanced learner's English dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.
21. Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Harlow: Longman.
22. Cytowic, R. E. (2002). Synesthesia: A union of the senses (2nd edition). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
23. Dagman, J., Karlsson, M., & Wikstrom, L. (2010). Investigating the haptic aspects of verbalised product experiences. International Journal of Design, 4(3), 15-27.
24. Davies, A., Blakeley, A. G. H., & Kidd, C. (2001). Human physiology. Washington, DC, U.S.A.: Churchill Livingstone, National Charity Services, Inc.
25. Espe H. (1991). Symbolic qualities of watches. Object and Images-Studies in Design and Advertising, pp.124-131.
26. Fenko, A., Otten, J. J., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2010). Describing product experience in different languages: The role of sensory modalities. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3314-3327.
27. Finke, R. A., & Freyd, J. J. (1994). Imagery. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
28. Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477-491.
29. Gleitman, Henry. (1981/1995). Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
30. Goldstein, E.B. (2010). Sensation and perception. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
31. Grunwald, A.P. (1965). A braille-reading machine. Science, 154, 144-146.
32. Harding, J. (2004). Medical encyclopaedia: Aging changes in the senses. Retrieved January 22, 2009, from http://www. nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/004013.htm
33. Heller, M. A. (1982). Visual and tactual texture perception: Intersensory cooperation. Perception & Psychophysics, 31(4), 339-344. doi: 10.3758/BF03202657
34. Hepworth, B. (1954). Barbara Hepworth retrospective exhibition. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
35. Hinckley, K., & Sinclair, M. (1999). Touch-sensing input devices. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States: ACM, pp.223-230.
36. Hollins, M., Faldowski, R., Rao, S., & Young, F. (1993). Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(6), 697-705.
37. Hung, S. H, & Chuang, M. C. (2006). A study on the relationship between texture image and the constitution of suiting fabrics. Taiwan Textile Research Journal, 16(4), 38-47.
38. Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1987). Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury: a neurophysiological model of the bases of recovery from stroke. Prog Brain Res, 71, 249-266.
39. Jindo, T., & Hirasago, K. (1997). Application studies to car interior of kansei engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 105-114.
40. Kao, C. H. (2002). Exploring the relationship between the style and image and the goggles feature - From the style of prototype. Journal of Design, 7(1), 33-46.
41. Karana, E., & Hekkert, P. (2010). User-material-product interrelationships in attributing meanings. International Journal of Design, 4(3), 43-52.
42. Karlsson, G. (1996). The experience of spatiality for congenitally blind people: A phenomenological-psychological study. Human Studies, 19(3), 303-330.
43. Karlsson, M., & Velasco, A. V. (2007). Designing for the tactile sense: Investigating the relation between surface properties, perceptions, and preferences. CoDesign, 3(1), 123-133.
44. Katz, D., & Krueger, L. E. (1988). The world of touch. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (2003). Touch (A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor Eds.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
46. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Matula, D. E. (1993). Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19(4), 726-743.
47. Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., & Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: an 'expert system'. Perception and Psychophysics, 37(4), 299–302.
48. Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and emotion, 5(4), 345-379.
49. Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
50. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51. Kreifeldt, J. (2013). Some thoughts on haptic aesthetics for design transmodal aesthetics. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction International Conference, Theme: Cross-Cultural Design. Methods, Practice, and Case Studies, Las Vegas, USA.
52. Kreifeldt, J., Lin, R., & Chuang, M C. (2011). The importance of “feel” in product design feel, the neglected aesthetic “Do Not Touch”. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction International Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA.
53. Krippendorff, K. (2006). Semantic turn: New foundations for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
54. Kuo, W. F. (2007). Psychology and education of exceptional children. Taipei: Winjoin press.
55. Lederman, S. J. (1981). The perception of surface roughness by active and passive touch. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18(5), 253-255.
56. Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 342-368.
57. Lederman, S. J., Loomis, J. M., & Williams, D. A. (1982). The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness. Perception & Psychophysics, 32(2), 109-116.
58. Lo, I. L., & Chuang, M. C. (2003). The effect of texture of lacquer coating on the kansei evaluation of plastic product. Paper presented at the 6 the ADC the Asian Design International Conference, Theme: Design philosophy, Kansei philosophy, Tsukuba, Japan.
59. Loomis, J. M., & Lederman, S. J. (1986). Tactual perception (K. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. Thomas Eds.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
60. Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, Mass: MIT. Press.
61. Malnar, J. M., & Vodvarka, F. (2004). Sensory design. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
62. Maurer, C & Overbeeke C.J. & Smets, G. (1991). The semantics of street furniture. Object and Images-Studies in Design and Advertising, pp. 86-93.
63. Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1986). Thought-induced attitiude change: The effects of schema structure and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 259-269.
64. Nakada, K. (1997). Kansei engineering research on the design of construction machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 129-146.
65. Neisser, U. (1972). Changing conceptions of imagery. London: Academic Press.
66. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
67. Okamoto, S., Nagano, H. & Yamada, Y. (2013). Psychophysical dimensions of tactile perception of textures. Journal of IEEE Transactions in Haptics, 6(1), 81–93.
68. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “need for touch” scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430-442.
69. Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2006). If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 765-769.
70. Picard, D. (2006). Partial perceptual equivalence between vision and touch for texture information. Acta Psychologica, 121(3), 227-248.
71. Picard, D., Dacremont, C., Valentin, D., & Giboreau, A. (2003). Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. Acta Psychologica, 114(2), 165-184.
72. Poppeliers, J. C., Chambers, S. A. Jr., & Schwartz, N. B. (1983). What style is it? : A guide to American architecture. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
73. Prytherch, D., & McLundie, M. (2002). So what is haptics anyway? Research issues in art design and media, ISSN 1474-2365 (Issue No.2), Spring 2002.
74. Reisberg, D. (1992). Auditory imagery. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 532-547.
76. Ross, S. D. (1982). A theory of art. New York: State University of New York.
77. Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2006). The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta Psychologica, 121(1), 41-64.
78. Schifferstein, H. N. J. & Cleiren, M. P. H. D. (2005). Capturing product experiences: A split-modality approach. Acta Psychologica, 118(3), 293–318.
79. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Desmet, P. M. A. (2008). Tools facilitating multi-sensory product design. The Design Journal, 11(2), 137-158. doi: 10.2752/175630608X329226
80. Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert, P. (Eds.). (2008). Product experience. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
81. Schmitt, B.H. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 53-67.
82. Schultz, L. M., & Petersik, J. T. (1994). Visual-haptic relations in a two-dimensional size-matching task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 395-402.
83. Schwartz, A. S., Perez, A. J., & Azulaz, A. (1975). Further analysis of active and passive touch in pattern discrimination. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6(1), 7-9.
84. Shephard, R. N. (1978a). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33(2), 125-137.
85. Shephard, R. N. (1978b). Externalization of mental images and the act of creation. New York: Academic Press.
86. Smith, A. M., Chapman, C. E., Deslandes, M., Langlais, J. S., & Thibodeau, M. P. (2002). Role of friction and force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 211–223.
87. Sonneveld, M. H., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2008). The tactual experience of objects. In H. N. J. Schifferstein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product Experience. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
88. Sturman, D. J. & Zeltzer, D. (1993). A Design Method for “Whole-Hand” Human-Computer Interaction. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 11(3), 219-238.
89. Tanoue, C., Ishizaka, K., & Nagamachi, M. (1997). Kansei engineering: A study on perception of vehicle interior image. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 115-128.
90. Taylor, M. M., Lederman, J., & Gibson, R. H. (1973). Tactual perception of texture (E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman Eds. Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
91. Tiest, Wouter M. Bergmann. (2010). Tactual perception of material properties. Vision Research, 50(24), 2775-2782.
92. Tribushinina, E. (2008). Cognitive reference points: Semantics beyond the prototypes in adjectives of space and colour. Netherlands: Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.
93. Van Egmond, R. (2008). The experience of product sound. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
94. Van Lottum, C., Pearce, J., & Coleman, S. (2006). Features of kansei engineering characterizing its use in two studies: Men's everyday footwear and historic footwear. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 22(6), 629-650.
95. Vega-Bermudez, F., Johnson, K. O., & Hsiao, S. S. (1991). Human tactile pattern recognition: Active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65(3), 531-546.
96. Walker, J. A. (1990). Design history and history of design. USA, MA: Pluto Press.
中文文獻
1. 柯超茗（1997）。材料視覺與觸覺質感意象的研究。未出版碩士論文，雲林科技大學，雲林。
2. 呂明泉（2002）。視覺與觸覺意象差異研究-塑膠咬花。未出版碩士論文，成功大學，台南。
3. 林東龍，張文裕（2005）。混合材質在視觸覺上之差異性研究。高雄師大學報，19，pp.1-15。
4. 張春興（2009）。現代心理學：現代人研究自身問題的科學。臺北：東華出版社。
5. 蘇文清，嚴貞，李傳房（2007）。符號學與認知心理學基礎理論於視覺設計之運用研究-以“標誌設計”為例。人文暨社會科學期刊，3，1，95-104。
6. 陳烜之（2006、2007）。認知心理學。台北市：五南。
7. 周麗容（2005）。觸感意象引導國小學生視覺藝術表現的教學行動研究-以台中市文心國小為例。未出版碩士論文，新竹教育大學，新竹。
8. 蔡毓芬（譯）（2001）。格式與造形原理。台北：地景出版社。（Itten, Johannes, 1888-1967）。
9. 葉重新（2004）。心理學。臺北：心理出版社。
10. 卓淑玲（1985）。觸覺與系列性視覺之形狀偵測機制研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台灣大學，台北。
11. 林寶蓮（2001）。造形之視覺與觸覺意象研究-以塑膠容器形態為例。未出版碩士論文，銘傳大學，台北。
12. 張勝成（1991）。國小視覺障礙學生圖形觸覺教學效果之研究（國科會專題研究計畫成果報告編號：NSC80-0301-H018-005）。台北：中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
13. 林崇宏（1995）。造形基礎。台北：藝風堂。
14. 林崇宏（2007）。設計基礎原理。台北：全華科技圖書公司。
15. 陳俊宏、楊東民（1999）。視覺傳達設計概論。台北：全華科技圖書。
16. 蔡承諭（2004）。視、觸覺之形態與材質對產品意象影響研究。未出版碩士論文，雲林科技大學，雲林。
17. 彭聃齡，張必隱（2000）。認知心理學。台北：東華書局股份有限公司。
18. 李北達（譯）（1998）。牛津高階英漢雙解詞典。台北市：敦煌。（Albert Sydney Hornby, 1984）。
19. 陳俊智（2001）。以坐椅設計為例探討中西設計風格的認知與判斷。設計學報，6，2，79-99。
20. 陳啟雄，程英斌（2005）。應用風格理論探索明代靠背椅風格之研究。設計學報，10，4，87-105。
21. 顧惠敏（2006）。產品造形意象之衝突性協調研究。未出版碩士論文，華梵大學，台北。
22. 郭繼生（1995）。藝術史與藝術批評。台北市：書林。
23. 鍵和田務（1992）。設計史。台北市：藝風堂。
24. 莊明振，陳俊智（1994 ）。中西坐椅設計風格認知之探討。工業設計，23，4，228-241。
25. 莊明振，陳俊智（2004）。產品形態特徵與構成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究-以水壺設計為例。設計學報，9，3，43-58。
26. 劉宛育（2006）。建築風格辨識觀點的轉換-數位風格的浮現。未出版碩士論文，國立交通大學，新竹。
27. 詹若涵（2004）。產品意象與造形特徵之對應關係探討。未出版碩士論文，銘傳大學設計，台北。
28. 張耀仁（2010）。產品觸覺風格的探討-以握杯為例。未出版碩士論文，國立交通大學，新竹。
29. 廖敏如（2001）。塑膠材質透明度在產品感知設計應用之探討。未出版碩士論文，大葉大學，台中。
30. 鄭麗玉（1993）。認知心理學-理論與應用。台北：五南。
31. 游恆山（譯）（1998）。心理學。臺北：五南圖書出版社。（P. G. Zimbardo, 1990）
32. 徐磊青、楊公俠（2005）。環境心理學：環境，知覺和行為。台北：五南圖書出版社。
33. 游恆山、李素卿譯（1999）。心理學。台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。（Philip G. Zimbardo, Richard J. Gerrig,1979）
34. 王凱立，余青翰，卓玉敏，林伯涵，夏詩閔，孫嘉宏，陳美智，張芝綾，黃薇如，簡彩雲(譯)，王錫崗(總校閱)（2012）。人體生理學：身體功能之機轉(Vander's Human Physiology)。新北市：藝軒圖書出版社。（Eric P. Widmaier, Hershel Raff, Kevin T. Strang,2010）
35. 莊安祺譯（2008）。感官之旅（感知的詩學）。台北：時報文化出版社企業股份有限公司。（Diane Ackerman,1990）
36. 王甦、汪安聖（2004）。認知心理學。台北：五南圖書出版社。
37. 高建平譯（2005）。藝術即經驗。北京:商務印書館。(Dewey, J.,1859-1952)
38. 王受之（1997）。世界現代設計-Modern Design 1864-1996。台北市：藝術家出版社。
39. 羅雅萱譯 (2008) 。當代設計演化論。台北：原點出版。(Bhaskaran, L., 2005)
40. 林銘煌 (2013)。工業設計思潮(增訂版)。台北:全華。(ISBN 978-957-21-8801-9)
41. 徐峰、李慶祥 (2005)。精密機械設計。北京：清華大學出版社。
網頁文獻
1. Engineering Toolbox：http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/index.html(2016.06.22)
2. 聯東金屬販售材料熱傳導係數表：http://www.landon.com.tw/blog/rewrite.php/read-21.html(2016.06.22)
3. TED PELLA, INC：https://www.tedpella.com/company_html/hardness.htm(2016.06.22)；Mohs scale of mineral hardness
4. 英國莫式硬度WIKI百科：http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohs_scale_of_mineral_hardness(2016.06.22)
5. 台灣WIKI百科：http://www.twwiki.com/wiki/%E6%BB%91%E5%8B%95%E6%91%A9%E6%93%A6%E4%BF%82%E6%95%B8(2016.06.22)
6. 機械設計常用材料網站：http://coccad.com/subject/about/2824.html(2016.06.22)

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	學齡前兒童之森林意象--以中部地區兒童爲例

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫