:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以協作敘事取徑促進幼教師專業發展歷程之探究
作者:張素貞
作者(外文):Chang, Su-Chen
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:課程與教學研究所
指導教授:劉美慧
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:幼教師協作敘事取徑教師專業發展敘事探究preschool teacherscollaborative-narrative approachteachers’ professional developmentnarrative inquiry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
我是一位幼教的師資培育者,長期關注幼教師的專業發展,企圖在現有的幼教師專業發展方案之外,尋找另一種可能的取徑。本研究旨在透過協作敘事取徑,促進幼教師的專業發展,探究其歷程與成效,並再概念化幼教師專業發展取徑。
本研究採敘事探究方法,邀請彰化一所幼兒園的八位幼教師,組成「幼教師協作敘事團體」。本團體的運作兼重生命故事與教學故事的敘說,透過閱讀與敘說、教學難題的討論、團體的互動、對話與反思,共歷時一年半的協作敘事。
我主要規劃與運作團體的議程、營造團體的氣氛、促發協作者敘說及引導協作者進行討論與對話。本研究透過觀察、訪談與文件分析的方式蒐集運作歷程中的資料,並運用主題分析法加以分析。
研究結果發現,協作敘事取徑啟動幼教師專業發展的關鍵要素包括教師主體性的關注、團體凝聚力的建立、幼教師身分的覺知與建構、反思性思維的運作以及協作者、研究者和專業文本三方視域的對話與交融。本協作團體能促進幼教師專業發展,包括提升幼兒課程設計與教學實施能力、規劃適性的學習環境與發揮班級經營的效能、掌握人際溝通與經營技巧和致力於教師專業的開展與成長。
再概念化在職幼教師專業發展取徑的內涵為以關懷和開展生命為根基、「教師<-->學習者」身分的跨越與混種、透過多重回觀、反思與解構將經驗意義化、從對話中學習、課程是經驗文本/敘事文本、多元方法的運作方式以及知識是藉由三重敘事-->反思-->對話-->建構-->行動的建構而來。
最後根據結論,提出職前的幼教師資培育課程、在職的幼教師專業研習課程與後續研究的轉向與相關建議。
As a teacher educator, I have long concerned myself with the professional development of preschool teachers to identify an alternative approach to facilitate their improvement. In this study, a collaborative-narrative approach was used to facilitate the professional development of preschool teachers. The process and effectiveness of the said approach were later investigated and reconceptualized.
I invited eight preschool teachers from a preschool in Changhua to form a “collaborative-narrative group,” which focused on the narration of life and teaching stories in a course that spanned 18 month long. The group involved reading and narration, group interactions, dialogues and reflections, and discussions of difficulties encountered during teaching. My primary responsibility was to encourage and guide the collaborators’ engagement in narration, dialogues, and discussions. This study adopted narrative inquiry. Data involving the process of the collaborative-narrative group were collected through observations, interviews, and document analysis, followed by a thematic analysis method to examine the collected data.
The study results showed that the key factors of the collaborative-narrative approach that facilitated the professional development of preschool teachers included the teachers’ subjective attention, establishment of team cohesion, awareness and establishment of the teachers’ identity, and reflective thinking conducted through a three-way interaction between the collaborators, researchers, course text. The collaborative-narrative group introduced in this study successfully facilitated the preschool teachers’ professional development, which included improving their ability to design preschool curriculum and conduct teaching, organize learning environments and manage class adequately, master interpersonal communication and management skills, and dedicate themselves to their personal growth and professional development.
The approach for developing in-service preschool teachers’ professional development education was reconceptualized through the idea of caring for and expanding life. This enabled border-crossing the identities of teachers and learners. Moreover, multiple reflections were conducted to deconstruct experience and convert it to knowledge. This way, dialogue engagement enables learning, and curriculum as experiential and narrative texts. Finally, a diversified method was applied to acquire knowledge through triple narrative, reflections, dialogues, constructions, and actions.
According to the conclusions, this study proposed not only the recommendations for teacher education programs for preschool teachers but also the suggestions for further studies.
中文部分
丁雪茵(2003)。讓成長的動力持續下去。載於幼兒教育改革研究會(主編), 來!說我們的故事─幼教師的專業成長(17-36頁)。臺北市:心理出版社
丁雪茵(2012)。組織文化與幼稚園課程變革之輔導歷程:一所公立幼稚園之長期個案研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(編號:NSC 98-2410-H-134-006-MY2),未出版。
王秋絨譯(2002)。學習的弔詭:社會中的個人蛻變(原作者:P. Jarvis)。臺北市:學富文化。(原著出版於1992年)
王建軍、黃顯華(2003)。協作式的課程發展與教師專業發展。載於黃顯華、孔繁盛(主編),課程發展與教師專業發展的夥伴協作(1-17頁)。香港:香港中文大學出版。
王靜珠(2000)。落實幼兒教育師資培育制度由重視師範教育做起。幼兒教育年刊,12,1-16。
王靜珠(2012)。王靜珠文集〔下〕:幼兒教育篇。臺北市:五南出版社。
方永泉譯(2003)。受壓迫者教育學(原作者:P. Freire)。臺北市:巨流出版社。(原著出版於1970年)
全國教保資訊網(2015a)。輔導。臺北市:教育部。2015年3月27日,取自:
http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?page_id=159
全國教保資訊網(2015b)。104年度幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱研習參加方式。臺北市:教育部。2015年9月21日,取自:http://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads
全國法規資料庫(2015c)。法規查詢。2015年8月5日,取自:http://law.moj.gov.tw/Index.aspx
伍振鷟譯(1971)。聯合國文教組織關於教師地位建議案(原作者:United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)。臺北市:中國教育學會。(原作出版於1966年)
江麗美(譯)(1999)。幼教典範-六個傑出的幼教老師(原作者:W. Ayers)。臺北市:桂冠出版社。(原著出版於1989)
宋文里(譯)(2001)。教育的文化(原作者:J. Bruner )。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版於1996年)
李慕華(譯)(2000)。反思教學:成為一位探究的教育者(原作者:J. G. Henderson)。
臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版於1997)
宋文里(2002)。敘事與意識:另一個對話的位置。應用心理研究,16,157-165。
周淑卿(2004)。課程發展與教師專業。臺北市:高等教育。
林育瑋(1996)。幼教教師的專業成長歷程。臺北師院學報,9,803-832。
林育瑋(2003)。幼教教師的人際互動關係。載於幼兒教育改革研究會(主編), 來!說我們的故事─幼教師的專業成長(245-262頁)。臺北市:心理出版社。
林香君(2005)。應用敘事探究於教師教學經驗的轉化:以一位實踐統整課程教師的教學意義建構為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊,65,125-134。
林佩蓉(2003)。幼教夥伴,大家一起來成長!載於幼兒教育改革研究會(主編), 來!說我們的故事─幼教師的專業成長(1-6頁)。臺北市:心理出版社。
林佩蓉(2006)。失衡、失焦與失控的幼師培育政策。國民教育,46(6),24-37。
林佩蓉、陳娟娟(2010)。幼稚園輔導計畫之現況分析與省思。國教新知,56(4),15-26。
林佩蓉(2015年5月)。台灣幼教師資培育的昨日、今日、明日。「2015百年幼教論壇暨國際學術研討會」,國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所。
林佩璇(2002)。教學知識之研究:從研究典範的轉移到整合理解。課程與教學季刊,5(3),17-34。
林壽惠(1993)。教育部技職司八十一年度研究專案-醫事、護理類專科學校設置幼保科、組研究專案。台北市:教育部。
林春妙、楊淑朱(2005)。幼兒教師專業知能之研究。兒童與教育研究,1,55-84。
林清章(2012)。幼兒園教師專業能力指標之建構。幼兒教保研究期刊,8,53-79。
幸曼玲(2014)。邁向幼兒教育的新里程。載於幸曼玲(主編),幼兒園教保活動課程大綱的實踐(3-16頁)。臺北市:心理出版社。
幸曼玲、楊金寶、邱嘉慧、柯華葳、蔡敏玲、金瑞芝、郭李宗文、簡淑真、林玫君(2015)。新課綱想說的事:幼兒園教保活動課程大綱的理念與發展。臺北市:心理出版社。
邱慧芳(2010) 。一名男性幼教主管的生命故事。耕莘學報,8,135-147。
范信賢、黃茂在(2003)。課程改革中教師關心什麼?—教師敘說的探究。國教學報,15,149-174。
范信賢(2005)。讓教師變得更強:敘事、作品與社群。國立東華大學教育研究所學術活動文案記錄,1-6。2015年4月14日,取自: http://www.edu.ndhu.edu.tw/note/notebook/93-2/sch2_(04)940409.pdf93-2
范信賢(2009)。協作敘事的教師學習社群。研習資訊,26(3),27-34。
洪蓉徽、莊智棻(譯)(2008)。幼兒教育概論(原作者:A. M. Gordon, & K. W. Browne)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版於2007年)
孟樊(2001)。後現代的認同政治。新北市:揚智出版社。
徐明佑譯(2012)。地球上的天堂(原作者:S. Oppenheimer)。新北市:旺旺出版社。(原著出版於2006年)
胡幼慧、姚美華(2008)。一些質性方法上的思考。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(117-132頁)。臺北市:巨流出版社。
胡美智(2011)。從女性主義觀點探究幼教工作者之生命經驗。教育研究學刊,7,287-316。
胡美智(2013)。幼教師課程與教學生命史之探究(未出版之博士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
胡紹嘉(2008)。敘事、自我與認同—從文本考察到課程探究。臺北市:秀威出版社。
翁麗芳、黃怡貌(1995)。台灣幼兒教育發展之研究-托兒所的演變在台灣幼兒教育發展上的意義。史聯雜誌,25,11-38。
翁開成(2005)。生命、書寫與心理健康。應用心理研究,25,27。
倪鳴香(2004)。童年的蛻變:以生命史觀看幼教師角色的形成。教育研究集刊,50(4),17-44。
夏林清譯(2003)。反映回觀:教育實踐的個案研究(原作者:D. A. Schon)。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版於1991年)
夏林清譯(2004)。反映的實踐者:專業工作者如何在行動中思考(原作者:D. A. Schon)。臺北市:遠流出版社。(原著出版於1983年)
夏林清(2012)。斗室星空:家的社會田野。臺北市:導航基金會。
高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:首航初探之旅。臺北市:麗文文化。
莊明貞(2005)。敘事探究及其在課程研究領域之發展。教育研究月刊,130,14-29。
陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論與應用。臺北市:師大書苑。
陳美玉(1999)。教師專業學習與發展。臺北市:師大書苑。
陳欣希(2009)。引領幼教師專業成長的祕訣—激發並維持成長動力。國教新知,56(4),27-36。
陳木金、王素芸、楊念湘(2011年11月)。我國高級中等以下學校暨幼稚園教師在職進修研習課程規劃之研究。「2011師資培育的黃金十年」國際學術研討會論文集,國立台中教育大學。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南出版社。
陳淑琴(2008)。台灣幼托機構課程模式的發展探究:從課程究是敘事文本的觀點。香港大學基礎教育學報,17(1),17-32。
許玉齡、新竹幼教輔導團(2003)。新竹市幼稚園教師自我評鑑手冊。新竹市:新竹市政府。
張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120 。
張明麗 (2003)。早年家庭經驗影響女性幼稚園教師之個案研究。幼兒保育學刊,1,148-170。
張純子(2009)。 教師專業認同之敘說探究:一位男性幼兒教師「找尋」與「轉化」的故事。國民教育研究學報,2 3,8 1 - 111。
張純子(2010a)。幼教工作者專業認同歷程之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
張純子(2010b)。二位公私立幼稚園教師專業發展之傳記史探究。幼兒保育學刊,8,1-16。
張純子(2014)。資深幼兒教師信念與教學實務知識之敘說探究。南臺學報,39,131-146。張秀卿(1988)。近四十年來我國托兒事業之發展。教育資料集刊,13,147-176。
張盈堃(2013)。幼教工作者生活世界的探究-朝向文化研究取向的可能性。教育資料與研究,111,29-53。
張素貞(2014)。我的幼稚園輔導之旅。幼兒教保研究期刊,12,1-18。
張素貞(2015)。原住民幼教師身分認同之探尋。教育研究與實踐,28(1),61-98。
教育部(2006a)。台灣地區幼稚園教師在職進修學需求調查-課程與教學部分。2015年9月22日,取自:http://www2.inservice.edu.tw/
教育部(2006b)。台灣地區國小教師在職進修學需求調查-課程與教學部分。2015年9月22日,取自:http://www2.inservice.edu.tw/
教育部(2010)。100年度全國教師在職進修資訊網及全國推廣中心工作計畫。2015年9月21日,取自:http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/
教育部(2013)。幼兒園教保專業知能研習實施辦法。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2014a)。師資培育法。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2014b)。全國教師在職進修網。2014年8月15日,取自:http://www1.inservice.edu.tw/
教育部(2014c)。103 學年度教師自我專業進修研習規劃。2015年9月22日,取自:http://teacher.inservice.edu.tw/
教育部(2014d)。幼兒園教保活動課程暫行大綱。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2015a)。幼兒園教保活動課程手冊(上)。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2015b)。專科以上學校教保系科申請培育幼兒園教保員審認作業手冊。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2015c)。全國教師在職進修網。2015年1月27日,取自:http://www3.inservice.edu.tw/index2-3.aspx?Map=S06
教育部(2016a)。中華民國教師專業指引標準。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2016b)。幼兒園輔導計畫。臺北市:教育部。
陳佩正譯(2007)。教師生命自傳(原作者:N. Nieto)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版於2003)
國家教育研究院(2014)。雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。2015年3月27日,取自:http://terms.naer.edu.tw/
黃瑞琴(2005)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社。
甄曉蘭(1997)。教學理論。載於黃政傑(主編),教學原理(439-465頁)。臺北市:師大書苑。
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務:解構與重建。臺北市:高等教育。
廖鳳瑞譯 (1989)。專業的幼教老師(原作者:L. G. Katz)。臺北市:信誼基金會。(原著出版於1977年)
劉美慧(2005)。多元文化師資培育:一位師資培育者的敘事探究。載於中華民國師範教育學會(主編),教師的教育信念與專業標準(203-230頁)。臺北市:心理出版社。
劉美慧(2008)。成為多元文化教育工作者:師資培育者與基層教師的敘事探究、課程意識與教學實踐。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫(編號:NSC95-2413-H-003-035),未出版。
劉美慧(譯)(2009)。教學越界:教育及自由的實踐(原作者:b. Hooks)。臺北市:學富文化。(原著出版於1994年)
蔡春美(1988)。近四十年來我國幼兒教育師資之培養。教育資料集刊,13,41-65。
蔡敏玲、余曉雯(譯)(2003)。敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(原作者:D. J. Clandinin & F. M. Connelly)。臺北市:心理出版社。(原著出版於2000年)
劉貴傑(2005)。詮釋學及其教育意涵。區域人文社會學報,8,1-27。
潘淑滿 (2003)。質性理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社。
賴誠斌、丁興祥(2004)。自我書寫與生命創化—以蘆荻社大學員蕃薯的故事為例。應用心理研究,25,73-114。
潘正德(1999)。團體動力學。臺北市:心理出版社。
歐用生(1996)。教師專業成長。臺北市:師大書苑。
歐用生(2010)。課程研究新視野。臺北市:師大書苑。
歐用生(2011)。教師是故事創造者。載於陳伯璋(主編),課程美學(123-143頁)。臺北市:五南出版社。
盧美貴(2012)。幼兒教育概論。臺北市:五南出版社。
賴春金(2001)。幼稚園教師在職進修需求。教師天地,115,27-33。
謝斐敦、陳彥宏(2009)。女性生命故事光作坊實務手冊:騙嬰仔ㄟ查某人之生命拼布。台南市:崑山科大幼保系。
鍾怡靜(2014)。幼兒園課程即自傳文本-我的幼教課程意識與教學實踐研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立中山大學,高雄市。
魏美惠(2014)。近代幼兒教育思潮。臺北市:心理出版社。
簡楚瑛(1997)。幼教老師在職進修的現況與展望。新幼教,14,16-19。
簡楚瑛(2009)。課程發展理論與實務。臺北市:心理出版社。
蘇愛秋(2003)。學習角和大學習區。載於簡楚瑛(主編),幼教課程模式:理論取向與實務經驗(55-120頁)。臺北市:心理出版社。
饒見維(1996)。教師專業發展:理論與實務。臺北市:五南出版社。
顧瑜君(2007)。夥伴關係課程發展歷程中專家角色之研究。當代教育研究,15(2),頁141-186。
西文部分
Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses-negotiating personal professional spaces. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ins.
Bhabha, H., & Rutherford, J. (1990). The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207-237). London, UK: Lawrence and Wishert.
Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London, UK: Routledge.
Bayles, M. D. (1988). The professions. In J. C. Callahan (Ed.), Ethical issues in professional life (pp. 27-30). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1990). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & D. C. Calfee (EDs.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673-708) . New Tork, NY: Prentice Hall International.
Bruner, J. (1985). Narrative and paradugmatuc mode of thought. In E. Eisner(ED.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing(pp.97-115). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Butt, R., Raymond, D., McCue, G., & Yamagishi, L. (1992). Collaborative autobiography and the teacher’s voice. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 51–98). London, UK: Routledge.
Carol, M. (2000). Teacher change. In J. S.Ritchie & D. E.Wilson, Teacher narrative as critical inquiry-rewriting the script (pp. 90-112). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Cavazos, L., & The members of WEST(2001). Connected conversation: forms and functions of teacher talk. In C. M. Clark (Eds.), Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp. 137-171). New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Center for the Study of Child Care Employment(2014, February 12). Early childhood educator competencies a literature review of current best practices, and a public input process on next steps for California. Berkeley: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment. Retrieved from http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/cscce/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/competencies_report08.pdf
Center for Technology in Learning, SRI International (2014, February 12). Systemic vs. one-time teacher professional development: what does research say? Retrieved from http:// education.ti.com.
Clark, C. M. (2001). Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers' classroom images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 361-385.
Clandinin, J. D. (1993a). Learning to collaborate at the university: Finding our places with
each other. In J. D. Clandinin, A. Davis, P. Hogan & B. Kennard (Eds.), Learning
to teach. teaching to learn: Stories of collaboration in teacher education (pp 177-
191). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
Clandinin, J. D. (1993b). Teacher education as narrative inquiry. In J. D. Clandinin, A. Davis, P. Hogan & B. Kennard (Eds.), Learning to teach. teaching to learn: Stories of collaboration in teacher education (pp. 1-15). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
Clandinin, J. D. (1993c). Creating new spaces for women: Restorying teacher education. In J. D. Clandinin, A. Davis, P. Hogan & B. Kennard (Eds.), Learning to teach. teaching to learn: Stories of collaboration in teacher education (pp. 153-161). New York, NY: Teacher's College Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry : Experience and story in qualitative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Clandinin, D. J. (2001).Foreword. In C. M. Clark (Eds.), Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning(pp. vii-viii). New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J . (2002). Narrative inquiry: Toward understanding life,s artistry. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2),161-169.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teacher college press。
Collins COBUILD Advanced Dictionary of American English. (2007). Boston, MA: Thomson.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Research, 19(5), 2-14.
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (1999). Doing Qualitative Research. London, UK: Sage .
Craig, C. J., & Olson, M. R. (2002). Stories as a way of learning both practical and reflective orientations. In N. Lyons & V. K. LaBoskey (eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching ( pp. 115-129). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Day, C. (1993). The development of teachers’ thinking and practice: Does choice lead to empowerment? In J. Elliott (Ed.), Reconstruction teacher education: Teacher development. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1995). The experiential text and the limits of visual understanding. Educational Theory, 45(1), 7-18.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Bosten, MA: Heath and Co.
Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York, NY: Free Press.
Diamond, C. T. P., & Halen-Faber, C. V. (2005). Apple of change: Art-based methodology as poetic and visual sixth sense. In C. Mitchell, S. Weber & K. Oreilly-Scanlon (Eds.), Just who do we are?: Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching (pp. 81-94). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Diamond, C. T. P., & Mullen, C. A. (1999). The postmodern educator: Arts based inquiries and teacher development. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Eisele, J. E., & Wootton, L. R. (1971). Educating the curriculum specialist. Educational Leadership, 29(1), 50-55.
Eisner, E. W. (2002). Special series on art-based educational research. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2),131-137.
Eisner, E. W. (2005). From episteme to phronesis to artistry in study and improvement of teaching. In Reimagining schools (pp. 193-204). New York, NY: Rouledge.
Elbaz-Luwisch, F. (2005). Teacher voices: Storytelling and possibility. Greewich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspect. In M. C. Wittrock, (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp.37-49). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The natire of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3-56.
Florio-Ruane, S. (1991). Conversation and narrative in collaborative research: Anethnography of the written literacy forum. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings(Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 234-256). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Freire, P. (1973). Education for critical consciousness. New York, NY: Continuum.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6, 207-226.
Ghaye, T., & Ghaye, K. (1998). Teaching and learning through critical reflective practice. London, UK: David Fulton Press.
Gipe, J. P., & Richards, J. C. (1992). Reflective thinking and growth in novices, teaching abilities. Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 52-57.
Gitlin, A. D. (1990). Educative research, voice, and school change. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), November, 443-466.
Goodson, I. F. (1991). Teachers,Lives and Educational Research. In I. F. Goodson & R. Walker. Biography, identity and schooling: Episodes in educational research (pp. 137-149). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Goodson, I. F. (1994). Studying the teacher's life and work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 29-37.
Goodson, I. F. (1998). Storying the self: Life politics and the study of the teachers life and work. In W. Pinar (ed.), Curriculum-toward new identities (pp. 3-20). New York, NY : Garland Publishing, Inc.
Goodman, J. (1995). Working with teachers to reform schools: Issues of power, expertise and commitment. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development (pp. 65-79). London, UK: Cassel.
Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger. California, CA: Wadsworth Publish Company.
Grimmett, P. P., Erickson, G. L., Mackinnon, A. A., & Riecken, T. J. (1990). Reflective practice in teacher education. In R. T. Clift, W. R. Houston & M. C. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs (pp. 20–38). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Grumet, M. R. (1992). Existential and phenomenological foundations of autobiographical method. In W. Pinar & W. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 28-42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381-391.
Harris, B. (1967). Roles of supervisors and curriculum workers. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED017994)
Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127-150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Hord, S. (1986). A synthesis of research on organizational collaboration. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 22–26.
Hord, S. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. Hord (ed), Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Henderson, J. G. (1992). Collaborative inquiry. In R. B. Miller (eds.), Reflective teaching: Becoming an inquiring educator (pp. 108-121). New York, NY: Mcmillan Publishing Company.
Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/R/Tography-A metonymic metissage. In R. L. Irwin & A. De- Cosson (Eds.), A/R/Tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27-38). London, UK: Pacific educational Press.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Josselson, R. (2007). The ethical attitudes in narrative research: Principles and practicalities. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology (pp. 537-566). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Katz, L. G. (1972). Developmental stages of preschool teachers. Elementary School Journal, 73(1),50-54.
Katz, L. G. (1988).Where is earlyhood education as a profession? In B. Spodek , O. N. Saracho & D. L. Peters (Eds.), Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner (pp. 75-83). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Getting the story, understand the lives: From career stories to
teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9 (5/6),
443-456.
Kelchtermans, G., & Vandenberghe, R. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: A biographical perespective. Curriculum Studies, 26(1), 45-62.
Kelly, J., & Cherkowshi, S. (2014, May 8). Collaboration, collegiality, and collective reflection: A case study of professional development for teachers. Retrieved from http:// www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/pdf_files/kelly_cherkowski.pdf
LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: a study of preservice teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
LaBoskey, V. K. (2002). Stories as a way of learning both practical and reflective orientations. In N. Lyons & V. K. LaBoskey (eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 31-47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. London, UK: Sage.
Ljubetić, M. (2012). New competences for the pre-school teacher: A Successful response to the challenges of the 21st century. World Journal of Education, 2(1) , 82-90.
Lyons, N., & LaBoskey, V. K. (2002). Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Makler, A. (1991). Imagining history: A good story and a well-formed argument. In C. Witherell & N. Noodimgs (eds), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 29-47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Martin, J. R. (1987). Reforming teacher education, rethinking liberal education. Teacher Colledge Record, 88(3), 406-409.
Mason, B. T. (1991). Supervisor or curriculum specialist? Educational Leadership, 27(4), 401-403.
Maxwell, T. W. (1991). Curriculum consultant. In A. Lewy (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 357-359). Oxford, UK: The Pergrnan Press.
May, W. T. (1991). Curriculum consultant. In A. Lewy (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum (pp. 359-361). Oxford, UK: The Pergman Press.
McIntyre, J. (1979). Curriculum specialist: Technician or advocate? Clearing House, 53(4), 175-176.
Measor, L., & Sikes, P. (1992). Visiting lives: Ethics and methodology in life history. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 209–233). London, UK: Routledge.
Messer-Davidow, E. (1985). Knowers, knowing, knowledge: Feminist theory and education. Journal of Thought, 20(3), 8-24.
Moore, A. (2007). Understanding the social self: The role and important of reflexivity in schoolteacher’s professional learning. In T. Townsend & R. Bates (EDs), Handbook of teacher education: Globalization, standards and professionalism in Times of Change (pp. 571-584). Netherland, NO: Springer.
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richderson (ED.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th. ED.) (pp. 877-904) .Washington, WA: American Educational Research Association.
Murray, S. B. (2000). Levels of narrative analysis in health psychology. Journal of
Health Psychology, 5(3), 337-347.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2016, March 19). Five core propositions. Retrieved from http://www.nbpts.org/five-core-propositions
Pinar, W. F. (1994). The method of currere. In Autobiography, politics, and sexuality (pp. 19-27). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (2004). Introduction. In What is curriculum theory? (pp. 1-11). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2007). Validity issues in narrative research. Qualitative Inquire, 13(4),
471-486.
Posner, G. J. (1996). Field experience: A guide to reflective teaching (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thanking have to say about research on teacher learning. Educational Research,18(3), 373-388.
Rath, A. (2002). Action research as border crossing: Stories from the classroom. In N. Lyons & V. K. LaBoskey (eds.), Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching (pp. 146-159). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ross, A. (2000). What is the curriculum. In curriculum construction and critique (pp. 8-17). London, UK: Falmer Press.
Richderson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richderson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (4th. Ed.) (pp. 905-947). Washington, WA: American Educational Research Association.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. California: Sage Publications.
Ritchie, J. S., & Wilson, D. E. (2000). Teacher narrative as critical inquiry-Rewriting the script. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Schubert, W. H. (1991). Teacher lore: A basis for understanding praxis. In C.Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 207-233). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Seifert, K. (1988). Men in early childhood education. In B. Spodek , O. N. Saracho & D. L. Peters (Eds.), Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner (pp. 105-116). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Shertzer, B., & Stone, S.C. (1981). Fundamentals of guidance. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd.) (pp. 3-369). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. Needham, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2014, June 24). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/ann_rev/smith-gillespie-07.pdf
Spodek, B., & Saracho, O. (1988).Professionalism in early childhood education. In B. Spodek, O. N. Saracho & D. L. Peters (Eds.), Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner (pp. 59-74). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Spodek, B. (1995). The professional development of early childhood teachers. Early childhood education symposium of Taiwan and United States: The professional development of early childhood teachers. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei.
Spodek, B. (1995). Selecting professional development activities. Early childhood education symposium of Taiwan and United States: The professional development of early childhood teachers. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei.
Spence, D. P. (1982). Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Norton & Company.
Thayer-Bacon, B. (1995). Constructive thinking: Personal voice. Journal of Thought, Spring, 55-70.
Tinoca, L. F., & Valente, M. O. (2014, June 09). The process of teacher change as a
consequence of professional development. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com.tw
Toepfer, C. (1977). The supervisor and curriculum worker: Commitment and competence. Retrieved from ERIC database.(ED155139)
Tom, A. R., & Valli, L. (1990). Professional knowledge for teachers. In W. R. Houston (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 373-392). New Tork, NY: Macmillan.
Vander, V. K. (1988). Pathways to professional effectiveness for early childhood educators. In B. Spodek , O. N. Saracho & D. L. Peters (Eds.), Professionalism and the early childhood practitioner (pp. 137-160). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
van Manen, M. (1982). Phenomenological pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 12(3), 283-299.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching live experience- human science for action sensitive pedagogy. New York, NY: Suny.
Vella, J. (1995). Training through dialogue: promoting effective learning and change with adult. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Walker, R. (1991). Making sense and losing meaning. In I. F. Goodson & R. Walker, Biography, identity and schooling: Episodes in educational research (pp. 107-113). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, identity. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Witherell, C., & Noddings, N. (1991). Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic books.
Zellermayer, M. (2001). Resistance as a catalyst in teachers, professional development. In C. M. Clark (Eds.), Talk shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp. 40-63). New York, NY: Teacher College Press.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE