臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：貨櫃航商不同策略群組經營效率研究-以資料包絡分析
作者：黃望修
作者(外文)：Huang, Wang-Hsiu
校院名稱：國立臺灣海洋大學
系所名稱：航運管理學系
指導教授：林光
張志清
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2016
主題關鍵詞：貨櫃航運；策略群組；資料包絡分析；效率分析；類別分析；Container Shipping；Strategic Group；Data Envelopment Analysis；Efficiency Analysis；Categorical Analysis
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
當航運產業面臨全球衰退之趨勢時，航運公司隨之調整其經營策略，以往的 研究揭示其調整多集中在運務精簡，或市場資源的重分配，本研究提出了建立企 業基本健全與能力為企業追求的經營目標，並檢證國際貨櫃航運各不同策略群組 的經營策略，有助於航運產業績效改善。本文首先將全球主要貨櫃航運業者，按照其執行擴張導向策略的程度分級為四個集群，而後以資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)為基礎進行類別分析(categorical analysis)，其間並建置三個時間視窗(time window)以產生所有貨櫃航運業者的效率值。
本研究建構基本經營策略的健全因子有兩類，一類含貨櫃運能與多角化兩項，另一類含以資產負債比例為代表的財務槓桿與以自有/租用貨櫃船隊比例為代表的營運槓桿，四者不同強弱程度之交互作用衍生效益對體質產生不同效果。本研究以營業收入、息前稅前與折舊攤銷前利得(EBITDA)，及淨利為業者績效指標，維持這些指標各期的優勢即為追求長期經營目標，本研究驗證了維持四者的動態平衡發展，可以達到貨櫃航運業者的擴張目標。
本研究分析模型分三階段，首先建構一過渡性 DEA 模型以測試規模效率； 其後為全正值的類別分析模型，並經 Mann-Whitney U test 分析證實集群平均值 差異的顯著性；最後導入負值因素建立 Range Directional Model (RDM)，作為完整的類別分析，由這些模型產生多項貨櫃航運業的效率值，可以對繁複的產業環境作深入廣泛的瞭解。研究結果顯示，在追求貨櫃航運業的永續發展中，業者以高運能低槓桿為策略者，較低運能高槓桿者有較佳的效率，要改善效率須從模型之四象中做動態調整。本研究提出全球主要貨櫃航航商的集群分類方法，以及平衡長期策略的概念，可對航運公司經營注入有利內涵；本研究之發現可做為航運公司策略研究之參考。
When shipping industry encountered global economic decline, container carriers adjusted their management strategies as indicated in previous researches. Most of their strategies, however, focused on operational reduction or market reallocation. Through efficiency analysis of various strategic groups of container carriers, this study found that improving management efficiency by building fundamental organizational competence and capabilities is a better approach to achieve sustained high performance. This research proposes a two-dimension measure to categorize major global container carriers into four groups according to their degree of long term growth-oriented strategies. The long term growth-oriented strategies are defined in two dimensions, one is represented by container fleet capacity and scope diversification, whilst the other consists of financial leverage (asset/debt ratio) and operating leverage (owned/chartered fleet ratio). Container carriers seeking for long-term success as measured by revenue, EBITDA and net profit need to maintain dynamically balanced positioning between aggressive capacity and conservative leverage among the four categories of strategic groups.
A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model was constructed to examine efficiency of container carriers. A Range Directional Model (RDM) with advanced classification of Decision Making Units (DMUs) is further conducted. Enhanced with these two refinements to the initial DEA model, the study performed a complete categorical analysis of container carriers’ efficiency across three time windows. The research results showed that the carriers operating with high capacity and low leverage performed better than their counterparties with low capacity and high leverage in sustaining their profits. To improve the performance, it requires dynamic re-positioning and adjustment among the four strategic quadrants as defined in our models. This balanced strategic positioning concept provides a new insight into the way shipping companies should be managed in the business cycles.
一、中文部分
1. 吉利，陳坤銘合譯(1984)，流沙上的現代經濟，台北：長河出版社。
2. 成中英 (2011)，C理論：中國管理哲學，中國大陸：人民東方出版社。
3. 邱惠玲 (2005)，不同生命週期下，企業經營績效與多角化策略之研究，台灣科技大學財金所碩士論文。
4. 陳春美 (2006)，唯行動或唯固網相對於全業務電信經營效率的研究，交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文。
5. 創意力文化事業編譯 (1988)，新科學革命，台北：創意力文化事業。
6. 曾仕強 (2011)，洞察易經的奧秘:易經管理的智慧，中國大陸：北京大學出版社。
7. 蔡伸章譯 (1993)，能趨疲：新世界觀，台北：志文出版社。
二、英文部分
1. Albertijn, S. Bessler, W. and Drobetz, W., (2011) “Financing shipping companies and shipping operations: A risk-management perspective,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp.70-82.
2. Ali, A. and Seiford, L.M. (1990) “Translation invariance in data envelopment analysis,” Operations Research Letters, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 403-405.
3. Amit, R., and Livant, J., (1988), Diversification Strategies, business cycles, and economic performance,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 99-110.
4. Andersen, P. and Petersen, N.C. (1993), “A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 39, pp. 1261-1264.
5. Andrew, K.R., (1971), The concept of corporate strategy, Homewood IL.: Dow-Jones-Irwin.
6. Asmild, M., Paradi, J., Aggarwall, V and Schaffnit, C. (2004) “Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 67-89.
7. Bang, H.S., Kang, H.W., Martin, j. and Woo, S.H. (2012), “The impact of operational and strategic management on liner shipping efficiency: a two-stage DEA approach,” Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2012, 653-672
8. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. (1984) “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1078-1092.
9. Baskin, K. (2011), “How Chinese thought can lead the transformation in management practice,” Chinese Management Studies, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 354-367.
10. Berry C.H. (1971), “Corporate growth and diversification,” Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 371-383
11. Bodie, Z., Kane, A. and Marcus, A. (2004) “Essentials of Investments,” 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
12. Brooks, M.R., (2000) Sea Change in Liner Shipping, Pergamon, Oxford.
13. Caves, R.E. and Pugel, T. (1980), “Intra-industry differences in conduct and performance: viable strategies in US manufacturing industries,” Monograph, New York University.
14. Chakravarthy, B., Lorange, P. (2004), Leading for Growth: Dealing with Leadership Dilemmas.
15. Charnes, A. et al. (1985), “Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production function,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 30, pp. 91-107.
16. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” European of Operations Research, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 429-444.
17. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M. (1994), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
18. Cheng, C.Y. (2005), “What is Wisdom?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 317-318
19. Chiu, R.H. (1996), “Logistics Performance of Liner Shipping in Taiwan,” PhD diss., Dept of Maritime Studies and International Transport, University of Wales College of Cardiff.
20. Cool, K. and Schendel, D., (1988) “Performance differences among strategic group members,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 207–223.
21. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. (2006) Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References, Springer, London.
22. Das, S.S. (2011), “To partner or to acquire? A longitudinal study of alliance in the shipping industry,” Mritime Policy & Management: The flagship lournal of international shipping and port research, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp.111-128.
23. Dess, G.G., Davis, P., 1984, Porter’s (1980), “Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 467-488.
24. Dynamar, Dynaliners Special, 4/2013, 24 July
25. Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 120, pp. 253-281.
26. Ferrari, C., Parola, F. and Benacchio, M. (2008) “Network economies in liner shipping: the role of home markets,” Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 35, No.2, pp. 127-143.
27. Fiegenbaum, A. and Thomas, H. (1990), “Strategic groups and performance: the US insurance industry 1970-84,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 197–215.
28. Førsund, F.R. (1992), “A comparison of parametric and non-parametric efficiency measures: The case of Norwegian ferries,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, No. 1-2, pp. 25-43
29. Fremont A., (2007), “Global maritime network: the case of Maersk,” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 431-442.
30. Galbraith, C., Merrill, G.B. and Morgan, G. (1994), “Bilateral strategic groups: the market fornon-tactical navy information systems,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 613–626.
31. Graham, M.G., (1998), “Stability and competition in intermodal container shipping: Finding a balance,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.25, No 2, pp. 129-147.
32. Gutiérrez, E., Lozano, S. and Furió, S. (2013) “Evaluating Efficiency of International Container Shipping Lines: A Bootstrap DEA Approach,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 55-71.
33. Hamel, G., Prahalad, C.K. (1993), “Strategy as stretch and leverage,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, pp. 75-84.
34. Harrigan, K.R. (1980) “Clustering competitors by strategic groups,” Proceedings of the Southwest Academy of Management Conference, San Antonio.
35. Harrigan, K.R. (1985), “An application of clustering for strategic group analysis: summary,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.55–73.
36. Heaney, S. (2008), “Top 20 container lines,” American Shipper September, pp.67-70.
37. Hergert, M. (1983), “The Incidence and Implications of Strategic Grouping in US ManufacturingIndustries,” Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
38. Herrero, Ines. (2005), “Different approaches to efficiency analysis: An application to the Spanish Trawl fleet operating in Moroccan waters,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 167, No. 1, p. 257-271.
39. Hoskisson, R.E. (1987), “Multidivisional structure and performance: the contingency of diversification strategy,” The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 4625-644.
40. Hunt, M.S. (1972), Competition in the major house appliance industry 1960–1970, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
41. Imai, A., Nishimura, E., Papadimitrious, S., Liu, M., (2006), “The economic viability of container mega-ships,” Transport Research Part E, Vol.42, No. 1, pp. 21-41.
42. Itoh, H., (2002) “Efficiency changes at major container ports in Japan: a window application of data envelopment analysis,” Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp.133-152.
43. Johnson E. (2011), Top 20 container lines, American Shipper, Sept. pp. 36.
44. Kling, J.A. and Smith, K.A. (1995), “Identifying strategic groups in the U.S. airline industry: an application of the Porter model,” Transportation Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 26–34.
45. Lele, M.M., (1992), “The lessons of strategic leverage,” Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 38-45.
46. Lewis, P. and Thomas, H. (1990), “The linkage between strategy, strategic groups, and performance in the UK retail grocery industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 385–397.
47. Lim, S.M. (1998) “Economies of scale in container shipping,” Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 361-373.
48. Lin L.C. and Tseng C.C. (2007), “Operational performance evaluation of major container ports in the Asia-Pacific region,” Maritime Policy Management, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 535-551.
49. Lirn, T.C., Shang, K.C., and Lu, C.S. (2014), “Strategic groups evaluation and firm performance for logistics services providers,” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 652-679.
50. Lorange, P. (2009), Managing in Business Cycle, Ivey Business Journal.
51. Lorange, P. (2005), Shipping Company Strategies, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 25.
52. Lornage, P. and Norman, V.D. (1973), Shipping Management, Bergen, Institute for Shipping Research.
53. Lu, C.S. (2000), “Logistics services in Taiwanese maritime firms,” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 79-96.
54. Lu, C.S. and Marlow, P.B. (1999) “Strategic groups in Taiwanese liner shipping,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1–26.
55. Lun, Y.H.V., Lai, K.H., Cheng, T.C.E. (2009), “A descriptive framework for the development and operation of liner shipping networks,” Transport Review: A Transnational Transdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp.439-457.
56. Lun, Y.H.V., Lai, K.H., Cheng, T.C.E. (2010), Shipping & Logistics Management, 63, Hong Kong Polytechnic Univ., Dept of Logistics & Maritime Studies, Springer Verlag London Ltd.
57. Lun, Y.H.V. and Marlow, P. (2011), “The impact of capacity on firm performance: A study of the liner shipping industry,” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 57–71.
58. Lynch R., (2003), Corporate Strategy, 3rd ed, Prentice Hall Financial Times, London.
59. Magirou, E.F., Psaraftis, H.N., Christodoulakis, N.M., (1992), Quantitative methods in shipping, Ch.3, Athens Univ. of Economics and Business, Report No E115.
60. Mason, R., Nair, R., (2013), “Supply-side strategic flexibility capabilities in container shipping,” International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 22-48.
61. Mas-Ruiz, F.J., Ruiz-Moreno, F. and Martinez, L.D.G. (2014), “Asymmetric rivalry within and between strategic groups,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol,35, pp.419-439.
62. Mckinsey & Company, (1989), Challenges in the 1990s: Strateging in Norwegian shipping companies, Oslo.
63. Mckinsey & Company, (1985), Excellence in Norwegian Shipping, Oslo
64. Miller, D., Friesen, P.H., (1986), Porter’s (1980) generic strategies and performance: an empirical examination with American data, Part 1, Organization Studies, Vol. 7, pp. 37-55.
65. Murray, A.A., (1988), “A contingency view of Porter’s generic strategies,” Academy of Management Reviw, Vol. 13, pp. 390-401.
66. Norman, M. and Stoker, B. (1991), Data Envelopment Analysis: The assessment of Performance, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
67. Oster, S. (1982) ‘Intra-industry Structure and the Ease of Strategic Change’, Review of Economic and statistics, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 376-383.
68. Panayides, P.M. (2003), Competitive Strategies and Organizational Performance in Shipping Management, Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Ltd.,
69. Panayides, P.M., Lambertides, N., Savva, C.S., (2011), “The relative efficiency of shipping companies,” Transportation Research Part E, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp.681-694.
70. Parola F., Caschili S., Medda F., and Ferrari C. (2014). “Measuring the scope of inter-firm agreements in the container shipping industry: an empirical assessment,” International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 466-487.
71. Peled, A. (2007), “Is aleverage strategy a good strategy for a bank?” Primary Credit and Operating Circular 10, FRB of Philadelphia.
72. Porter, M.E., (198) Competitive Strategy. Free Press., New York.
73. Rimmer, P.J. (1998), “Ocean liner shipping services: Corporate restructuring and port selection/competition,” Asia Pacific Viewpoint, Vol.39, No 2, pp. 193-208.
74. Robinson, R. (1998), “Asian hub/feeder nets: The dynamics of restructuring,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol.25, No. 1, pp. 21-40.
75. Ryoo, D.K., Lee, T.W. (2005), “The role of liner shipping co-operation in business strategy and the impact of the financial crisis on Korean liner shipping companies,” The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, pp. 346-374.
76. Sandberg, W.R., (1986), New venture performance: The role of strategy ang Industry structure, Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
77. Sjostrom, W., (2009), Competition and corporation in liner shipping, Centre for Policy Studies, National Univ. or Ireland, Cork, working paper No 2009-02
78. Slack, B., Corntois, C., McCalla, R., (2002), “Strategic alliance in the container shippingindustry: a global perspective,” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 65-76.
79. Smith, W.R. (1956), “Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 21, pp. 3-8.
80. Sondergaard, J., Eismark, L.R., Bovermann, J. (2012), Balancing the Imbalances in Container Shipping, Ideas and Insights, A.T. Kearney Global.
81. Sum, C.C., Teo, C.B. and Ng, K.K. (2001), “Strategic logistics management in Singapore,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, Vol. 9, No. 10, pp. 1239-1260.
82. Tone, K. (1997), “DEA with Controllable Category Levels,” in proceedings of the 1997 Spring National Conference of the Operations Research Society of Japan, pp. 126-127.
83. Varadarajan, P.R., Clark, T., (1994), “Delineating the scope of corporate, business and marketing strategy,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 31, pp. 93-105.
84. Walker, O.C., Ruekert, R.W., (1987), “Marketing’s role in the implementation of business strategies,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, pp. 15-33.
85. Yamin, S., Gunasekaran, A., Mavondo, F.T., (1999), “Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis,” Technovation, Vol. 19, pp. 507-518.
86. Yoon S.C. (2011), Long-term Oriented Management Philosophy to Manage Technology Companies, College of Bus. Adm., Seoul Nat. Univ. Korea, p1.
87. Yue, P. (1992) “Data envelopment analysis and commercial bank performance: A primer with applications to Missouri Banks,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 31-45.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：296（臺灣：289，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2413552 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68216382
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上