臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：企業社會責任表現變動與股價報酬關聯之實證研究
作者：葛俊佑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Chun-You Ko
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：會計學研究所
指導教授：葉疏
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2015
主題關鍵詞：企業社會責任；股權價值；股價報酬；企業社會責任優勢；企業社會責任劣勢；Corporate Social Responsibility；Shareholder Value；Stock Returns；CSR Strength；CSR Concern
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:10
近年國際間社會責任投資 (socially responsible investment) 的快速發展，顯示企業社會責任已是投資人關心的重要活動；而無論自願性或強制性永續報告書 (sustainability report) 及整合報告書 (integrated report) 的編製，皆突顯利害關係人對相關活動資訊的需求與重視。過去研究顯示企業從事社會責任相關活動不僅為企業帶來多方效益，也因此承擔諸多成本。然而，當企業改變社會責任活動投入時，投資人如何評估企業價值的變化；且當社會責任活動投入改變之項目屬性不同時，投資人對企業價值的變化是否具有不同判斷，過去研究提供的證據仍相當有限。本研究參照Ball and Brown (1968) 的研究方法，使用股價報酬檢驗企業社會責任表現變動對股權價值的影響。具體而言，本研究檢驗：(1)、企業社會責任表現之變動，與股價報酬間是否存在任何關聯；(2)、企業社會責任表現變動與股價報酬間之關聯性，是否因其變動項目屬性係企業之正面作為 (優勢；最佳管理實務) 或負面作為 (劣勢；企業面臨之嚴重挑戰) 而不同。
實證結果顯示，當未考慮企業社會責任表現變動項目之屬性，而僅以整體評分衡量時，無法發現社會責任表現變動與股價報酬間具有顯著一致的關聯性。進一步依據變動項目屬性分別進行測試時，則發現優勢項目變動與股價報酬呈現顯著負向關聯 (優勢增加時，報酬較低)，但劣勢項目變動與股價報酬呈現顯著正向關聯 (劣勢改善時，報酬較高)。本研究之發現顯示企業投入資源於改善其所面臨之社會責任挑戰議題 (劣勢) 時，投資人可能認同其作為將可替股東創造價值；但企業一味地投入資源於追求最佳管理實務 (優勢) 時，可能傷害股東之利益。本研究提供企業改變社會責任活動資源投入時，對於股權價值影響的證據，並呈現將企業社會責任活動資訊依屬性區分之重要性，實證結果亦可提供經理人從事社會責任相關活動決策參考的依據。
The rapid development of socially responsible investment (SRI) worldwide in recent years indicates that corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been an important activity that investors are interested in. The voluntary or mandatory preparation of sustainability reports and integrated reports also highlight the demand and significance of information about CSR activities to the stakeholders of firms. Prior research indicates that there are various costs and benefits associated with firms’ CSR activities. However, it is not clear how investors adjust their perceived firm value when firms change their inputs in CSR activities. Besides, little is known about whether investors’ adjustment in perceived firm value differs when firms change their CSR activities in different nature, i.e. positive performance (strength; management best practices) and negative performance (concern; most serious challenges). Following Ball and Brown (1968), this study uses stock performance to examine the net effect of changes in CSR performance. Specifically, this study examines: (1) whether there is any association between changes in CSR performance and stock returns, and (2) whether the association between changes in CSR performance and stock returns is conditional on the nature of CSR activities.
The empirical results show that, without considering the nature of CSR activities, changes in CSR performance do not have a significant correlation with stock returns. Further tests conditional on the nature of CSR activities reveal that for strength activities the changes in CSR performance have significantly negative associations with stock returns (firms with increase in strengths have lower returns), but for concern activities the changes in CSR performance have significantly positive associations with stock returns (firms with elimination in concerns have higher returns). The findings of this study indicate that managers could create value for their shareholders by engaging in CSR activities that address for serious challenges firms faced, while managers might destroy value for their shareholders by simply pursuing the best CSR practices. The findings of this study not only provide evidence of the effects on changes in equity value when firms change their inputs in CSR activities, but also highlight the importance of the distinction between information on different nature of CSR activities. These findings also provide important implications for managers in making CSR activities decisions.
Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1): 3-30.
Anderson, J. C., and A. W. Frankle. 1980. Voluntary social reporting: An iso-beta portfolio analysis. The Accounting Review 55 (3): 467-479.
Balakrishnan, R., G. B. Sprinkle, and M. G. Williamson. 2011. Contracting benefits of corporate giving: An experimental investigation. The Accounting Review 86 (6): 1887-1907.
Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (2): 159-178.
Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (1): 71-86.
Baron, J. 1996. Do no harm. Codes of Conduct: Behavioral Research into Business Ethics.197-213.
Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1): 77-104.
Becchetti, L., R. Ciciretti, I. Hasan, and N. Kobeissi. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder''s value. Journal of Business Research 65 (11): 1628-1635.
Belkaoui, A. 1976. The impact of the disclosure of the environmental effects of organizational behavior on the market. Financial Management 5 (4): 26-31.
Bénabou, R., and J. Tirole. 2010. Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77 (305): 1-19.
Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social Responsibility of the Businessman. New York: Harper.
Brammer, S., C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin. 2009. The stock performance of America''s 100 Best Corporate Citizens. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49 (3): 1065-1080.
Cahan, S. F., C. Chen, L. Chen, and N. H. Nguyen. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and media coverage. Journal of Banking and Finance 59: 409-422.
Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility evolution of a definitional construct. Business & society 38 (3): 268-295.
Chatterji, A. K., D. I. Levine, and M. W. Toffel. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 (1): 125-169.
Chatterji, A. K., R. Durand, D. I. Levine, and S. Touboul. 2014. Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Forthcoming, Strategic Management Journal.
Cheng, M. M., W. J. Green, and J. C. W. Ko. 2014. The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors'' decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (1): 131-162.
Cheung, A. W. K. 2011. Do stock investors value corporate sustainability? Evidence from an event study. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (2): 145-165.
Clarkson, P. M., Y. Li, and G. D. Richardson. 2004. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 329-353.
Cole, C. J., and C. L. Jones. 2004. The usefulness of MD&A disclosures in the retail industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 19 (4): 361-388.
Cormier, D., M. Magnan, and B. Morard. 1993. The impact of corporate pollution on market valuation: some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics 8 (2): 135-155.
Council on Foundations. 2012. Increasing Impact, Enhancing Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Leading Corporate Philanthropy. Virginia.
Crilly, D., N. Ni, and Y. Jiang. 2015. Do‐no‐harm versus do‐good social responsibility: Attributional thinking and the liability of foreignness. Forthcoming, Strategic Management Journal.
Dahlsrud, A. 2008. How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15 (1): 1.
Deckop, J. R., K. K. Merriman, and S. Gupta. 2006. The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management 32 (3): 329-342.
Deng, X., J. K. Kang, and B. S. Low. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics 110 (1): 87-109.
Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2011. Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review 86 (1): 59-100.
Dhaliwal, D. S., O. Z. Li, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2014. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33 (4): 328-355.
Dhaliwal, D. S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y. G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 723-759.
Di Giuli, A., and L. Kostovetsky. 2014. Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics 111 (1): 158-180.
Easton, P. D., and T. S. Harris. 1991. Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (1): 19-36.
Edmans, A. 2011. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics 101 (3): 621-640.
El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. C. Y. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (9): 2388-2406.
Entine, J. 2003. The myth of social investing. Organization & Environment 16 (3): 352-368.
European Commission. 2011. A Renewed EU Strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Brussels, Belgium.
Feng, Z. Y., M. L. Wang, and H. W. Huang. 2015. Equity financing and social responsibility: Further international evidence. The International Journal of Accounting 50 (3): 247-280.
Flammer, C. 2015. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Forthcoming, Management Science.
Freeman, R. E. 1994. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly 4 (4): 409-421.
Freeman, R. E., A. C. Wicks, and B. Parmar. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science 15 (3): 364-369.
Freeman, R. E., and J. Liedtka. 1991. Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach. Business Horizons 34 (4): 92-98.
Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine Sep. 13, 1970.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). 2013. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines: Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill, and J. M. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30 (4): 425-445.new window
Hassel, L., H. Nilsson, and S. Nyquist. 2005. The value relevance of environmental performance. European Accounting Review 14 (1): 41-61.
Herremans, I. M., P. Akathaporn, and M. McInnes. 1993. An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18 (7/8): 587-604.
Hoi, C. K., Q. Wu, and H. Zhang. 2013. Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) associated with tax avoidance? Evidence from irresponsible CSR activities. The Accounting Review 88 (6): 2025-2059.
Hong, H., and M. Kacperczyk. 2009. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93 (1): 15-36.
Huang, X., and L. Watson. 2015. Corporate social responsibility research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature 34: 1-16.
Ingram, R. W. 1978. An investigation of the information content of (certain) social responsibility disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 16 (2): 270-285.
International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). 2013. The International Framework. London.
Jaggi, B., and M. Freedman. 1982. An analysis of informational content of pollution disclosures. Financial Review 17 (3): 142-152.
Jaggi, B., and M. Freedman. 1992. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: Pulp and paper firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 19 (5): 697-713.
Jiao, Y. 2010 Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (10): 2549-2561.
Jo, H., and H. Na. 2012. Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics 110 (4): 441-456.
Karnani, A. 2011a. CSR stuck in a logical trap. California Management Review 53 (2): 105-111.
Karnani, A. 2011b. Doing well by doing good: The grand illusion. California Management Review 53 (2): 69-86.
Karoff, P. 2012. CSR Rule #1: Do no harm. Stanford Social Innovation Review Jun. 28, 2012.
Kerstein, J., and S. Kim. 1995. The incremental information content of capital expenditures. The Accounting Review 70 (3): 513-526.
Kim, Y., M. S. Park, and B. Wier. 2012. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review 87 (3): 761-796.
King, A. A., and M. J. Lenox. 2001. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5 (1): 105-116.
Kothari, S. P. 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31 (1): 105-231.
Lee, S., M. Singal, and K. H. Kang. 2013. The corporate social responsibility - financial performance link in the US restaurant industry: Do economic conditions matter? International Journal of Hospitality Management 32: 2-10.
Lev, B., C. Petrovits, and S. Radhakrishnan. 2010. Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal 31 (2): 182-200.
Lyon, T. P., and J. P. Shimshack. 2015. Environmental disclosure: Evidence from Newsweek''s green companies rankings. Business & Society 54 (5): 268-675.
Lyon, T., Y. Lu, X. Shi, and Q. Yin. 2013. How do investors respond to Green Company Awards in China? Ecological Economics 94: 1-8.
Lys, T., J. P. Naughton, and C. Wang. 2015. Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60 (1): 56-72.
Mackey, J., M. Friedman, and T. J. Rodgers. 2005. Rethinking the social responsibility of business. Reason 10:15-17.
Matsumura, E. M., R. Prakash, and S. C. Vera-Muñoz. 2013. Firm-value effects of carbon emissions and carbon disclosures. The Accounting Review 89 (2): 695-724.
Mattingly, J. E., and S. L. Berman. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business and Society 45 (1): 20-46.
Minor, D., and J. Morgan. 2011. CSR as reputation insurance: Primum non nocere. California Management Review 53 (3): 40.
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) ESG Research. 2015. MSCI ESG KLD STATS: 1991-2014 Data Sets: Methodology.
Moser, D. V., and P. R. Martin. 2012. A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility research in accounting. The Accounting Review 87 (3): 797-806.
Nidumolu, R., C. K. Prahalad, and M. R. Rangaswami. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review 87 (9): 56-64.
Oler, D. K., M. J. Oler, and C. J. Skousen. 2010. Characterizing accounting research. Accounting Horizons 24 (4): 635-670.
Owen, G. 2013. Integrated reporting: A review of developments and their implications for the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education 22 (4): 340-356.
Patten, D. M. 1990. The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures: The case of the Sullivan principles signings. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 (6): 575-587.
Phillips, R., R. E. Freeman, and A. C. Wicks. 2003. What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (4): 479-502.
Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2006. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78-92.
Porter, M. E., and M. R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89 (1/2): 62-77.
Ramchander, S., R. G. Schwebach, and K. Staking. 2012. The informational relevance of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from DS400 index reconstitutions. Strategic Management Journal 33 (3): 303-314.
Rivoli, P., and S. Waddock. 2011. "First they ignore you...": The time-context dynamic and corporate responsibility. California Management Review 53 (2): 87-104.
Scalet, S., and T. F. Kelly. 2010. CSR rating agencies: What is their global impact? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1): 69-88.
Servaes, H., and A. Tamayo. 2013. The impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The role of customer awareness. Management Science 59 (5): 1045-1061.
Shane, P. B., and B. H. Spicer. 1983. Market response to environmental information produced outside the firm. The Accounting Review 58 (3): 521-538.
Spicer, B. H. 1978. Investors, corporate social performance and information disclosure: An empirical study. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 94-111.
Vance, S. C. 1975. Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks. Management Review 64 (8): 19-24.
Waddock, S. 2003. Myths and realities of social investing. Organization and Environment 16 (3): 369-380.
Whetten, D. A., G. Rands, and P. Godfrey. 2002. What are the responsibilities of business to society? Handbook of Strategy and Management 373-408.
Wood, D. J., and R. E. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 (3): 229-267.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：578（臺灣：569，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67854281
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上