:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:基於評論探勘及評分因素分析之使用者喜好預測
作者:張馨予
作者(外文):Chang, Shin-Yu
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
指導教授:劉敦仁
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:推薦系統評分預測隱含主題模式面向語意協同過濾內容式過濾語意分析文字探勘Recommender systemRating predictionYelpLatent Dirichlet AllocationAspect-based SemanticsCollaborative filteringContent-based filteringSemantic analysisText mining
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
線上評論網站是熱門的評論資訊分享平台,提供使用者參考評論意見與評分來決定 消費行為,例如購買商品或是到訪商家。然而大量的線上評論資訊造成資訊過載問題, 使用者不容易找尋符合其喜好的商品或商家,因此分析線上評論網站之評論與評分來預 測使用者之喜好評分,並進行個人化推薦為重要之研究議題。
傳統使用者喜好評分預測方法大多以協同過濾方法分析歷史評分紀錄來預測個別 喜好評分,然而使用者之喜好評分通常受到不同面向的評分因素所影響,使用者對於各 面向有不同的喜好重視程度,而不同商家雖然有不同面向的表現,仍然可能獲得不同面 向喜好使用者所給予之相似評分。因此,僅分析使用者給予商家的評分來進行預測,無 法有效分析使用者在各面向之相似喜好以及商家在各面向之相似表現,將導致喜好預測 上的誤差。因此,傳統僅以使用者評分進行喜好分析預測之方法,有其限制而無法有效 預測喜好評分。
本研究提出新的使用者喜好評分預測方法,考量基於不同面向的評分因素包括使用 者對於不同面向的喜好重視以及商家在不同面向的表現,本研究探勘評論文字來發掘各 面向的意見語意,並以此為基礎分析使用者評分,發掘不同面向的評分因素,建立基於 面向喜好重視之使用者喜好評分預測模型,及商家的面向表現模型,進而預測使用者對 不同商家之喜好評分。本研究收集線上評論網站 Yelp 之資料進行實驗評估,實驗結果 顯示,本研究所提的方法優於傳統使用者喜好評分預測方法,能改善評分預測的準確性。
Online review websites are nowadays popular information sharing platforms, which help users decide whether to buy products or visit business stores by referring the review opinions and ratings. However, a large amount of review information results in information overload problems and difficulty for users to find preferred products or business stores. Accordingly, it is an important issue to predict user preferences and make recommendations by analyzing the review opinions and ratings on the websites.
Traditional rating prediction methods usually adopt collaborative filtering to predict user ratings based on historical rating records. However, users’ preference ratings are usually affected by the aspect-based ratings factors including user preference emphases and business performances on various aspects. Specifically, different users may have different emphases on aspect preferences. Business stores with different aspect performances may receive similar ratings from users with different aspect preferences. Consequently, predicting user preferences by only considering user ratings of business stores, cannot effectively identifying users with similar aspect preferences and business stores with similar business performances, and thus may result in poor predictions. Traditional methods, which only consider historical user ratings, are limited and not effective in predicting user ratings. This research proposes a novel rating
prediction method considering the aspect-based ratings factors. First, the review texts are analyzed to extract the opinion semantics of various aspects. Second, user ratings on aspect semantics are analyzed to discover the aspect-based rating factors, which are used to build the user rating prediction model and business performance model. Third, the two models are then used to predict user preference ratings on business stores. Finally, experiments are conducted to evaluate the proposed method using Yelp dataset. The experiment results show that the proposed method outperforms traditional methods and can improve the accuracy of rating predictions.
[1] H. Wang, Y. Lu, C. Zhai, Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: a rating regression approach, in: Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, 2010, pp. 783-792.
[2] S. Brody, N. Elhadad, An unsupervised aspect-sentiment model for online reviews, in: Proceddings of the Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp. 804-812.
[3] G. Ganu, N. Elhadad, A. Marian, Beyond the Stars: Improving Rating Predictions using Review Text Content, in: Twelfth International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB 2009), Providence, Rhode Island, USA, Citeseer, 2009, pp. 1-6.
[4] J. McAuley, J. Leskovec, D. Jurafsky, Learning attitudes and attributes from multi-aspect reviews, in: Procedding of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining, IEEE, 2012, pp. 1020-1025.
[5] M. Anderson, J. Magruder, Learning from the crowd: Regression discontinuity estimates of the effects of an online review database, The Economic Journal, 122 (2012) 957-989.
[6] P. Resnick, H.R. Varian, Recommender systems, Communications of the ACM, 40 (1997) 56-58.
[7] G. Adomavicius, A. Tuzhilin, Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions, IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 17 (2005) 734-749.
[8] J.S. Breese, D. Heckerman, C. Kadie, Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering, in: Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 1998, pp. 43-52.
[9] M. Deshpande, G. Karypis, Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 22 (2004) 143-177.
[10] B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, J. Riedl, Analysis of recommendation algorithms for e-commerce, in: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2000, pp. 158-167.
[11] P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, J. Riedl, GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews, in: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA,1994, pp. 175-186.
[12] Y. Koren, R. Bell, C. Volinsky, Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems, 0018-9162/09 IEEE, vol.42, no.8, pp.30-37, 2009.
[13] D.-R. Liu, C.-H. Lai, H. Chiu, Sequence-based trust in collaborative filtering for document recommendation, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69 (2011) 587-601.
[14] D.R. Liu, C.H. Lai, Y.T. Chen, Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group‐based approaches, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (2012) 2100-2117.
[15] D.-R. Liu, Y.-Y. Shih, Integrating AHP and data mining for product recommendation based on customer lifetime value, Information & Management, 42 (2005) 387-400.
[16] D.-R. Liu, Y.-Y. Shih, Hybrid approaches to product recommendation based on customer lifetime value and purchase preferences, Journal of Systems and Software, 77 (2005) 181- 191.
[17] D.-R. Liu, C.-H. Lai, W.-J. Lee, A hybrid of sequential rules and collaborative filtering for product recommendation, Information Sciences, 179 (2009) 3505-3519.
[18] R.J. Mooney, L. Roy, Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization, in: Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, San Antonio, Texas, United States, pp. 195-204, 2000.
[19] U. Shardanand, P. Maes, Social information filtering: algorithms for automating “word of mouth”, in: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1995, pp. 210-217.
[20] M. Balabanović, Y. Shoham, Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation, Communications of the ACM, 40 (1997) 66-72.
[21] M.J. Pazzani, D. Billsus, Content-based recommendation systems, The Adaptive Web, Lecture Notes in Computer Science P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa and W. Nejdl, eds., pp. 325-341: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2007.
[22] R. Burke, Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331-370, 2002.
[23] M.J. Pazzani, A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering, Artificial Intelligence Review, 13 (1999) 393-408.
[24] C. Zeng, C.-X. Xing, L.-Z. Zhou, Similarity measure and instance selection for collaborative filtering, in: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 652-658.
[25] P.S. Yu, Data mining and personalization technologies, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, IEEE, 1999, pp. 6- 13.
[26] M. Hu, B. Liu, Mining and summarizing customer reviews, in: Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, 2004, pp. 168-177.
[27] D.M. Blei, A.Y. Ng, M.I. Jordan, Latent dirichlet allocation, Journal of machine Learning research, 3 (2003) 993-1022.
[28] B. Lu, M. Ott, C. Cardie, B.K. Tsou, Multi-aspect sentiment analysis with topic models, in: Proceddings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, IEEE, 2011, pp. 81-88.
[29] J. Zhu, H. Wang, B.K. Tsou, M. Zhu, Multi-aspect opinion polling from textual reviews, in: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 1799-1802.
[30] T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, P. Hoffmann, Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis, in: Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2005, pp. 347-354.
[31] D. Tang, B. Qin, T. Liu, Learning semantic representations of users and products for document level sentiment classification, in: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Beijing, China, 2015, pages 1014–1023.
[32] T. Chinsha, S. Joseph, A syntactic approach for aspect based opinion mining, in: Proceddings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), IEEE, 2015, pp. 24-31.
[33] D. Tang, B. Qin, T. Liu, Y. Yang, User modeling with neural network for review rating prediction, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, 2015, pp. 1340-1346.
[34] J. Pennington, R. Socher, C.D. Manning, Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation, in: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2014, pp. 1532-1543.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top