國民小學校長魅力領導與互易領導對組織變革影響：學校社會網絡的中介效果_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	國民小學校長魅力領導與互易領導對組織變革影響：學校社會網絡的中介效果
作者：	廖昌珺
作者(外文)：	Liao, Chang-Chun
校院名稱：	國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱：	教育研究所
指導教授：	王智弘翁福元
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2017
主題關鍵詞：	魅力領導；互易領導；組織變革；社會網絡；Charismatic leadership；transactional leadership；organizational change；school social network
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:12

本研究探討國民小學不同背景變項之教師知覺校長領導風格之差異及學校社會網絡中介教師知覺校長魅力領導及互易領導於學校組織變革之影響，並綜合研究結果，提出對於教師、校長及教育相關人員之建議。
本研究採用問卷調查法，以臺中市、彰化縣與苗栗縣教師為研究對象，採分層叢集抽樣，施以改編之「國民小學校長魅力領導與互易領導對組織變革影響：學校社會網路的中介效果」問卷。問卷編製經文獻探討分析、專家審題、編製預試問卷、回收預試問卷統計分析後，編製正式問卷，分層叢集抽樣1020 位教師，回收866 份，得回收率84.90%，回收問卷經篩選後，得完全排除遺漏值有效問卷829 份，回收問卷之有效率95.73%。進行資料分析，研究以描述統計、ANOVA分析、t 檢定或F 檢定、結構方程式分析。
本研究得到以下結論：
1. 國民小學教師能感受到校長有魅力領導行為表現。
2. 國民小學教師對校長的互易領導的對後效酬賞與積極例外管理的運用有較高的感受。
3. 國民小學教師重視學校組織變革的發展過程。
4. 國民小學教師會關注學校社會網絡的關聯性、中心化與資源取得情形。
5. 對於組織變革的影響，校長魅力領導比互易領導容易受到社會網絡中介效果影響。
6. 男性、30-40 歲、年資11-15 年、教師兼主任與13-24 班規模的教師認為學校社會網絡中介效果對校長魅力領導與組織變革間的影響較大。
7. 女性、30-40 歲、年資11-15 年、級任教師與49 班以上的教師認為社會網絡中介效果對校長互易領導與組織變革間的影響較大。

以文找文

The study has three aims: 1. probing the differences of diverse background elementary school teachers’ awareness of different principals’ leading styles. Probing the relationship between elementary school principals’ Charasmatic leadership and organizational change with the mediation effect of school social network. 4. Probing the relationship between elementary school principals’ transactional leadership and organizational change with the mediation effect of school social network. Participants were recruited from Taichung City, Changhua County and Miaoli County, using stratified cluster sampling. Participants were asked to complete survey questionnaires on “the influence of elementary school principal’s Charismatic leadership and transactional leadership on organizational change - school social network as a mediator”. The try-out processes have been done to authenticate validity and reliability of study instruments. The response rate is 84.90% with 866 out of 1020 returned questionaires. The data is analysed by descriptive statistics, item analysis, ANOVA, T-test or F-test, and structural equation modeling.
The conclusions are as the following.
1. The relationship, centralization and resource acquisition of the social network of elementary school have obvious perceptions, and the recognition of social norms is relatively low.
2. The greater effect of school social network mediation of principals’ transactional leadership were higher for male teachers; 30-40 years old teacher age group comparative higher than other age group; 11-15 years teaching experiences comparative higher than other teaching experiences groups; teachers from 13-24 students class size group were higher than other students class size group .
3. The great effect of school social network mediation of principals’ transactional leadership were higher for female teachers; 30-40 years old teacher age group comparative higher than other age group; 11-15 years teaching experiences comparative higher than other teaching experiences groups; homeroom teachers and the teachers who teach size with more than 49 students were higherest among the prospective comparing groups.
The results reflected the status quo how elecmentary school teachers perceived principal Charismatic leadership and transactional leadership and can be served as references for implementing future school organizational change.

以文找文

王如哲與黃月純（2013）。大學校長全球化領導知能指標之建構。教育政策論壇，16（2），1-26。doi: 10.3966/156082982013051602001
吳明隆（2009）。結構方程式—AMOS的操作與應用。臺北市：五南。
吳清山（2004）。學校行政研究。臺北市：高等教育。
吳清山（2005）。當前學校組織變革的理念。教師天地，123，4-16。
吳清山與林天祐（1997）。組織變革。教育資料與研究，18，62。台北市：國立教育資料館。
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體AM0S之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。臺北市：心理。
林天佑（2000）。教育行政改革。臺北市：心理。
邱皓政（2008）。量化研究與統計分析—SPSS中文視窗資料分析範例解析。臺北市：五南。
秦夢群（1998）。教育行政：理論部分。臺北市：五南。
張苙雲（2011）。社會學實證研究中的脈絡效應。傳播研究與實踐，1（2），49-55。 new window

教育部（無日期）。國小概況表(80～104 學年度)。擷取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n=1B58E0B736635285&s=D04C74553DB60CAD
梁福鎮(2013)。教育行政學理論與實務。臺北市：五南。
黃芳銘（2009）。結構方程模式理論與應用，五版。臺北市：五南。
楊振昇（2005）。教育組織變革與學校發展研究。台北市：五南。 new window

榮泰生（2011）。Amos與研究方法。臺北市：五南。
潘慧玲（2002）。反思與展望：我們從學校革新中學到了什麼。學校革新：理念與實踐，潘慧玲主編，443-473。台北市：學富文化。 new window

謝文豪（2004）。學校變革領導。教育研究月刊，119，66-79。 new window

Adams, J. S. (1963). Wage inequities, productivity and work quality. Industrial Relations, 3, 9-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.1963.tb00805.x
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, & future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academy of Marking Science, 16, 76-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327.
Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 419–439.
doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.004.
Barbuto.J. E. (1997). Taking the charisma out of transformational leadership. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12(3), 689-697. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v10n3p26
Barbuto.J. E.,Jr. (1997). Taking the charisma out of transformational leadership. Social Behavior and Personality, 12(3), 689-697. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15533-3_2
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (2000). The future of leadership in learning organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 18-40. doi: 10.1177/107179190000700302.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S.
Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Kirkpatrick, S. A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 43-54. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.43.
Becker, B., & Smith, M. (2011).Social contexts & processes that influence effective school principals. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 4(1), 10-17.
Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (1995). Promoting effective school leadership: A change-oriented model for the preparation of principals. Peabody Journal of Education, 70(3), 14-36. doi: 10.1080/01619569509538833.
Bell, R. M. (2013). Charismatic leadership case study with ronald reagan as exemplar. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 6(1), 66-74.
Boyd, V. (1992). Creating a context for change. Issues about Change, 2(2). Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Brands, R., Menges, J. I., & Kilduff, M. (2015). The leader-in-social-network schema: The role of network perceptions in gendered attributions of charisma. Organization Science, 26, 1210-1225. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0965.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Bycio, P., & Hackett, R. D. (1995). Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional & transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 468-478. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.80.4.468.
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, 3nd ed. London: Routledge
Carter, D. R., DeChurch, L. A., Braun, M. T., & Contractor, N. S. (2015). Social network approaches to leadership: An integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 597–622. doi: 10.1037/a0038922
Choi, J. (2006). A motivational theory of Charismatic leadership: envisioning, empathy, and empowerment. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(1), 24-43 . doi:10.1177/1071791 9070130010501.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 439-45. doi: 10.1002/job.4030150508
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of Charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 12, 637–647. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306715
Craig, L. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, Jr. H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, & empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 6(2), 172–197. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
Deistler, M., & Seifert, H. (1978). Identifiability and consistent estimability in econometric models. Econometrica, 46, 969–980. doi: 10.2307/1909759
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, Transactional, & Laissez-Faire Leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.
Earle, L., & Earle, T. (1999). Social context theory. South Pacific Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 1-12.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: A social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 139-157. doi: 10.2307/2112701.
Furst, S. A., & Cable, D. M. (2008). Employee resistance to organizational change: Managerial influence tactics & leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 453–462. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.453
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective school. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328-355.
Hater, J. J., & Bass B. M. (1988). Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational & transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(4), 695-702. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.73.4.695.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 597-606. doi: 10.1086/222355
Hoogh, A. H. B. D., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2009).Neuroticism and locus of control as moderators of the relationships of Charismatic and autocratic leadership with burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 1058–1067. doi: 10.1037/a0016253
Hormuth, S. E. (1999). Social meaning and social context of environmentally-relevant behaviour: Shopping, wrapping, and disposing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 277-286. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1999.0134.
House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Ouarterly, 16, 321-338. doi: 10.2307/2391905.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. (eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The global study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993).Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891-902. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.891
Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational & transactional leadership, & distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680-694. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.5.680
Huckfeldt, R. R. (1983). Social contexts, social networks, and urban neighborhoods: Environmental constraints on friendship choice. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 651-669. doi: 10.1086/227908
James A, O., & Ogbonna, I. G. (2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: Evidence in literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(2), 355-361.
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 new window

Kenan Özcan, K., Karataş, İ. H., Çağlar, Ç., & Polat, M. (2014). Administrators’ power usage styles & their impact on the organizational culture in colleges of education: A case study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 560-569. doi: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core Charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36-51. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36
Klein, K. J. & House, R. J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 183-198. doi: 10.1080/17437270902946660
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A.H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1-13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001
Langlois, R. N. (1998). Personal capitalism as Charismatic authority: The organizational economics of a weberian concept. Industrial & Corporate Change, 7(1), 195-213. doi: 10.1093/icc/7.1.195
Mahoney, J. L. (2014). School extracurricular activity participation and early school dropout: A mixed-method study of the role of peer social networks. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 143-154. doi: 10.5539/jedp.v4n1p143.
Malle, B. F. (2011). Attribution theories: How people make sense of behavior. In Chadee, D. (Ed.), Theories in social psychology, 72-95. Wiley-Blackwell.Dual.
Mason, M.F. & Morris, M.W. (2010). Culture, attribution and automaticity: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 292-306. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq034.
McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), 117-130.
Medley, F, & LaRochelle, D. R. (1994). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Unpublished manuscript, University of Florida, College of Nursing.
Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J. & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64-79. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0158
Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2009). Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: The role of Charismatic leadership and employees’ trust in top management. Journal of Change Management, 9(4), 399–417. doi: 10.1080/14697010903360608.
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly December, 46(5), 623-670. doi: 10.1177/0013161x10378689
Moran, B. (1992). Gender differences in leadership. Library Trends, 40(3), 475-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420110395728.
Nohe, C., Michaelis, B., Menges, J. I., Zhang, Z., & Sonntag, K. (2013). Charisma & organizational change: A multilevel study of perceived charisma, commitment to change, & team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 378–389. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.02.001.
Opdenakker, M.-C., & Damme, J. V. (2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33 (2), 179-206. doi: 10.1080/01411920701208233
Pastor, J.-C., Meindl, J. R., & mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 410-420. doi: 10.2307/3069355
Pearce, C. L., & Sims, Jr. H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, & empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 6(2), 172–197. doi: 10.1037//1089-2699.6.2.172
Pieterse, J. H., Marjolein, C.J., Caniëls, M. C.J., & Homan, T. (2012), Professional discourses and resistance to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(6), 798 – 818. doi: 10.1108/09534811211280573
Pitts, V. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2009). Using social network methods to study school leadership. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 32(2), 185-207. doi: 10.1017/S106279870000380X
Rafferty, A. E., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). Perceptions of organizational change: A stress & coping perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1154–1162. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154
Rowold, J., & Laukamp, L. (2009). Charismatic leadership and objective performance indicators. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58 (4), 602–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00365.x
Rutter, M. (1999). Social context: meanings, measures and mechanisms. European Review, 7(1), 139-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279870000380X
Shamir, B., House, R. J. & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of Charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology, pp.290-312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. doi: 10.2307/270723
Sosik, J. J., & Dionne, S. D. (1997). Leadership styles and deming's behavior factors. Journal of Business & Psychology, 11(4), 447-462. doi: 10.1007/BF02195891
Stajkovic, A.D., Carpenter, M., & Graffin, S. (2011). Charismatic leadership, social networks, and goal-setting among U.S. and Chinese executives. In Carpenter, M. (Ed.), The handbook of research on top management teams. New York, NY: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Stewart, J. (2006). Transformational leadership: An evolving concept examined through the works of Burns, Bass, Avolio, and Leithwood. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 54, 1-29.
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Menges J. I. (2015). The miC.R.ofoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1361–1387. doi: 10.1177/0149206315573996
Venkataramani, V., & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology Copyright, 92(4), pp. 952–966. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.952
Venkataramani, V., Green, S. G., & Schleicher, D. J. (2010). Well-connected leaders: The impact of leaders’ social network ties on LMX and members’ work attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1071–1084. doi: 10.1037/a0020214.
Venkataramani, V., Richter, A. W., & Clarke, R. (2014 ). Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical Creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology , 99(5), 966–975. doi: 10.1037/a0037088
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. In Henderson, A. M. & Parsons, T. (Eds.), New York: The Free Press.
Weibler, J., & Rohn-Endres, S. (2010). Learning conversation and shared network leadership: Development, gestalt, and consequences. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(4), 181-194. doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000015
Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science : IS, 4(1), 67-67. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67
Wiza, M., & Hlanganipai, N. (2014).The impact of leadership styles on employee organisational commitment in higher learning institutions. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 135-143. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p135
Woolley, M. E., Kol, K. L., & Bowen, G. L. (2009). The social context of school success for Latino middle school students: Direct and indirect influences of teachers, family, & friends. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43-70. doi: 10.1177/0272431608324478
Young, B., & Smith, T. (1997). Findings from the condition of education: The social context of education. U.S. Department of Education, office of educational research & improvement, NCES 97-981.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations(8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Zohar, D., & Tenne-Gazit, O. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744–757. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	蒙特梭利教育理念促進校長變革領導之探究：以一所學校型態實驗教育為例
2.	國民小學校長文化領導實踐策略之探究
3.	國中師資培育的另類思維--選才先於培育
4.	十二年國教課綱轉化歷程之微觀政治個案探究--以一所前導學校為例
5.	臺灣學校型態實驗教育品質保證的內涵與發展策略
6.	地方政府教育政策實施成效評估之研究
7.	學校準備好了嗎？國高中教育人員實施108課綱的變革準備度
8.	國民小學校長實施公開授課之研究
9.	國民中小學校長推動108課綱的領導取向與具體作為
10.	中小學校長實施公開授課的作法、挑戰及前瞻
11.	凝聚學校共責的新力量：教師績效責任領導之實踐分析
12.	校長領導與教師教學支持
13.	一所小學校本課程的解構與重塑之論證分析--以微觀政治觀點取向
14.	運動與休閒管理專業化程度之評估指標建構
15.	國民小學校長分布式領導、教師組織承諾與資訊通信科技運用關係之研究

1.	國民中小學活化校園指標建構之研究
2.	行政機關改制行政法人關鍵因素之研究_以智慧資本及組織認同之觀點
3.	國民小學校長變革領導、動態能力與學校經營績效測量模式驗證及關係之研究
4.	技術型高中學校內部行銷與關係行銷對學生關係品質之跨層次影響研究
5.	高級中等學校學生學習成效之校務研究
6.	國民小學校長正向領導、教師希望感與學校效能關係之研究
7.	私立高級中學校長轉型領導、學校組織學習、教師專業發展與資優生有效學習之關係研究
8.	臺灣原住民族幼兒園實施沉浸式族語教學之研究
9.	國中教師參與決定、工作士氣與學校組織效能之研究
10.	競值架構應用在國民中學校長領導行為、學校組織創新與組織變革關係之研究
11.	我國普通型高中校長關係領導、組織變革、行政效能與競爭優勢關係之研究
12.	國民小學校長學習領導系統模式建構之研究
13.	國民小學教師變革關注、變革接受與教學效能關係之研究—以教師專業發展評鑑政策實施為例
14.	一位初任校長變革領導之個案研究
15.	高級中等學校校長領導行為與教師工作投入程度之關係研究-教師心理資本與工作動機的中介效果

1.	教育行政實務與應用
2.	教育行政：理論與模式
3.	學校組織變革 : 組織、領導人和成員的需求平衡與轉變
4.	我國教育部組織再造分析與展望
5.	社會變遷中大學治理體系現代化之挑戰與策略

無相關著作

1.	中部地區國民中學校長文化領導與學校組織變革關係之研究
2.	轉換型領導、交易型領導與工作績效關係之研究－以自我效能為中介效果

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫