:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探究過程導向式教學法應用於線上學習平台對大專護理學生學習英語寫作成效與看法之研究
作者:戴弘政
作者(外文):Hung-Cheng Tai
校院名稱:國立中山大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
指導教授:邱文彬
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2017
主題關鍵詞:過程導向式教學法外語教學英語寫作教學護理教育Process writing approachEnglish language writing teaching and learningEnglish as foreign language instructionNursing education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本研究探討「過程導向式教學法」應用於南部某科技大學護理系學生英文寫作的訓練成效。目標有四:一、評估過程導向式教學法所設計課程對於英文寫作能力提升的成效;二、探討學生對於過程導向式教學法所設計課程的滿意程度;三、探討學生對於過程導向式教學法所設計課程的看法;四、探討教師與線上助教對於過程導向式教學法所設計課程的看法。採單組實驗法不設置對照組,混合量性和質性資料收集。參與者包括44位知情同意參與研究、介於21至25歲的二技一年級學生、四位線上助教、及一位英語授課教師。教學介入採用過程導向式教學法,策略包含:提供線上寫作練習、多次修改、同儕回饋、教師與線上助教之間接回饋、直接回饋等共進行五篇寫作練習。資料收集工具含:寫作評分量尺、課程滿意度問卷、助教訪談、與教師反思日誌等四種。收集的量性資料以SPSS 21.0軟體分組間和組內兩類協助分析,主要用多變量重複量數的時間序列法(Repeated Measure MANOVA),質性資料則透過內容分析以輔助研究結果的說明。結果顯示:一、學生的前、中、後測的寫作能力都達顯著提升,且五次練習的寫作表現也都明顯進步;二、學生對於課程大致上感到滿意;三、學生對於課程的看法主要覺得線上寫作很能提高學習動力;回饋方式,則覺得教師和助教們的回饋比較同儕回饋要來的精確且有幫助;另外,學生覺得文法能力弱還是寫作的主要問題,而解決的方法則認為可以透過更多的閱讀來改善;四、教師和助教們則認為即時回饋是一項挑戰,而回饋的主要面向還是語言技能的教導,科技應用方面也有一些問題要克服。文末對大專生進行英語寫作教學時提供建議。
For nursing students in the vocational education system in Taiwan, English language writing skills instruction has long been ignored, jeopardizing their success in medical-oriented courses and careers. The current study tested the effectiveness of a language pedagogy, called process writing approach, in enhancing the learners’ learning outcomes. In this single-group without comparison experimental study, 44 students practiced 5 writing tasks guided by five teaching strategies: online writing platform, multiple revisions, peer review activities, and blended mode of teacher’s/tutors’ indirect and direct feedback, in one semester with 18 weeks. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed through statistical means and content analysis. Results showed the process writing approach significantly improved the learners’ writing competence. Students felt quite satisfied with the course design, perceived that the online writing practice as a meaningful activity, the teacher/TAs’ feedbacks were preferred as they were more accurate and helpful, and grammar competence was crucial for their writing capability while they believed more reading could be beneficial. Besides, the teacher/TAs held three perceptions toward the writing training course which were a demanding job, concentration on linguistics forms feedback, and some technological issues. Teaching implications were suggested.
Åberg, E. S., Ståhle, Y., Engdahl, I., & Knutes-Nyqvist, H. (2016). Designing a Website to Support Students'' Academic Writing Process. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(1), 33-42.
Ahmed, R. A. I., & Rajab, H. (2015). Enhancing Elementary Level EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension and Writing Skills through Extensive Reading Enrichment Program. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 28-43.
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373-398.
Anderman, E. M., & Dawson, H. (2011). Learning with motivation. In R. E. Maye & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 219-241). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ashton-Hay, S., & Pillay, H. (2010). Case study of collaborative learning in two contexts: what do English language learners gain? In E. Luzzatto & G. DiMarco (Eds.), Collaborative learning: Methodology, types of interactions and techniques (pp. 341-362). New York: Nova Science.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2005). Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Maths and Technology Education: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 69-93.
Barden, J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta‐cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 17-29.
Beach, R., & Bridwell, L. S. (Eds.). (1984). New directions in composition research. USA: Guilford Publications.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blass, L., Brown, K., Bunting, J. D., Diniz, L., Gordon, D., Hood, S., . . . Zemach, D. (2013). Skills for Effective Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Breuch, L. K. (2004). Virtual Peer Review: Teaching And Learning About Writing In Online Environments. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Brzozowski, A. M., Pike, A. C., Dauter, Z., Hubbard, R. E., Bonn, T., Engström, O., . . . Carlquist, M. (1997). Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor. Nature, 389(6652), 753-758.
Byrne, D. (1997). Teaching writing skills (9 ed.). London: Longman.
Cabell, S. Q., Tortorelli, L. S., & Gerde, H. K. (2013). How do I write…? Scaffolding preschoolers'' early writing skills. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 650-659.
Chen, K. T., Huang, T. S., Lin, S. R., & Lin, M. Y. (1993). College Entrance Examination Research Report: English Writing Assessment Criteria Taipei: College Entrance Examination Center.
Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language: Routledge.
Cohen, J. (1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and psychological measurement.
Connor, U., & Traversa, A. (2014). The Role of intercultural rhetoric in ESP education. Paper presented at the CELC 2014 Symposium on culture, cross-cultural communication, intercultural communication. Retrieved December.
Covill, A. E. (2010). Comparing peer review and self-review as ways to improve college students'' writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(2), 199-226.
Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling, 265, 296.
Deng, L., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Chen, P., & Zhan, Y. (2004). Implementing Process Writing Approach in the Experimental Teaching of College EnglishWriting [J]. Foreign Language Education, 25(6), 69-72.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58-74.
Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis: Oxford University Press.
Forrest-Pressley, D.-L., MacKinnon, G., & Waller, T. G. (2013). Instructional Practices: Academic Press.
GEPT. (2007). General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) Statistics Report on Elementary Level Test (year 2002-2007). Retrieved from Taipei: https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/research/statistics/初級測驗91~96年統計報告.pdf
Gliem, R. R., & Gliem, J. A. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales.
Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(I), 1-51.
Grabe, W. (2001). Notes toward a theory of second language writing. In T. J. Silva, & Matsuda, P. K. (Ed.), On Second Language Writing (pp. 39-57). Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1997). The writing course. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, & Hartford, B. (Ed.), Beyond methods: Components of second language teacher education (pp. 172-197). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1996). Theory And Practice Of Writing: An Applied Linguistics Perspective. New York: Longman.
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Second language reading-writing relations. Reconnecting reading & writing, 108-133.
Grabowski, J. (1996). Writing and speaking: Common grounds and differences toward a regulation theory of written language production. In C. M. Levy, & Ransdell, S. E. (Ed.), The science of writing (pp. 73-91). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879-896.
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396-407.
Griffiths, G. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31(3), 367-383.
Guénette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-53.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: OUP.
Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy, and Ransdell, S. E. (Ed.), The science of writing (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identify the organization of writing process. In L. W. Gregg, and Steinberg, E. R. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hedge, T. (1988). Writing. Oxford: OUP.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: OUP.
Hewett, B. L. (2000). Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision. Computers and Composition, 17, 265-288.
Honeycutt, L. (2001). Comparing e-mail and synchronous conferencing in online peer response. Written Communication, 18(1), 26-60.
Jang, S.-J., & Chen, K.-C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
Lan, Y. J., Sung, Y. T., Cheng, C. C., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Computer-supported cooperative prewriting for enhancing young EFL learners'' writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 134-155.
Lee, C. T. (2004). Why is there a ''bipolarity'' phenomenon? Retrieved from http://ejee.ncu.edu.tw/issues/04-1gapintro.htm
Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: Written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(01), 108-119.
Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201-213.
Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34-50.
Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., & Ki, W. W. (2014). The effects of a wiki-based collaborative process writing pedagogy on writing ability and attitudes among upper primary school students in Mainland China. Computers & Education, 77, 151-169.
Lingnau, A., Hoppe, H. U., & Mannhaupt, G. (2003). Computer supported collaborative writing in an early learning classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(2), 186-194.
Liou, H.-C. (2009). A case study of web-based peer review for college English writing. 課程與教學季刊, 13(1), 173-208.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Liu, P.-L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners'' writing. Comput. Educ., 57(4), 2548-2558.
Liu, Y., Surasin, J., & Brudhiprabha, P. (2015). An Application of the Process Writing Approach in Teaching English Writing to High School Students in China. Human Resource Development Journal, 6(1), 140-148.
Lo, J.-J., Yeh, S.-W., & Sung, C.-S. (2013). Learning paragraph structure with online annotations: An interactive approach to enhancing EFL reading comprehension. System, 41(2), 413-427.
Lu, R. L., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100-115.
Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer''s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (2014). Second language writing research: Perspectives on the process of knowledge construction: Routledge.
McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A discussion of Japanese to English contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44(2), 195-208.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, Calif. ; [Great Britain]: Jossey-Bass.
Min, H. T. (2003). Why peer comments fail. English Teaching & Learning, 27(3), 85-103.
Min, H. T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33, 293-308.
Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students'' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118-141.
Mourssi, A. (2013). Theoretical and practical linguistic shifting from product/guided writing to process writing and recently to the innovated writing process approach in teaching writing for second/foreign language learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 731.
Muncie, J. (2002). Process writing and vocabulary development: comparing Lexical Frequency Profiles across drafts. System, 30(2), 225-235.
NTIN. (2014). Curriculum framework: General education courses. Retrieved from http://www-news.ntin.edu.tw/teaching.aspx?id=36
Odom, S., & Helfers, R. C. (2016). Improving Criminal Justice Students’ Writing Outcomes Through Systematic Writing Instruction. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1-18.
Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter, and Nunan, D. (Ed.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (Vol. Chap.24, pp. 166-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pennington, M. C., Brock, M. N., & Yue, F. (1996). Explaining Hong Kong students'' response to process writing: An exploration of causes and outcomes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(3), 227-252.
Qi, F., & Zhang, L. (2015). A critical review of 40 years of contrastive rhetoric studies into L2 learners’ written discourse overseas and in China.
Racelis, J. V., & Matsuda, P. K. (2013). Integrating process and genre into the second language writing classroom: Research into practice. Language Teaching, 46(03), 382-393.
Reid, J. (2001). Writing. In R. Carter, and Nunan, D. (Ed.), The Cambridge Guide To Teaching English To Speakers Of Other Languages (pp. 28-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson, J. T. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147.
Santrock, J. W. (2008). Educational psychology (4th edition). New York: McGraw-Hill
Sasaki, M. (2000). Toward an empirical model of EFL writing processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 259-291.
Schoonen, R., & Gelderen, A. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165-202.
Shah, C., Erhard, K., Ortheil, H.-J., Kaza, E., Kessler, C., & Lotze, M. (2013). Neural correlates of creative writing: An fMRI Study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1088-1101.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners'' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
Sheen, Y. (2010a). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(02), 203-234.
Sheen, Y. (2010b). Introduction: The role of oral and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 169-179.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556-569.
Silvernail, D. L., & Gritter, A. K. (2007). Maine''s middle school laptop program: Creating better writers. Retrieved from Gorham, Maine: http://maine.gov/mlti/resources/Impact_on_Student_Writing_Brief.pdf
Simmerman, S., Harward, S., Pierce, L., Peterson, N., Morrison, T., Korth, B., . . . Shumway, J. (2012). Elementary Teachers'' Perceptions of Process Writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 51(4), 292-307.
Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
SPSS. (2012). IBM SPSS Statistics Version 21. Boston, Mass: International Business Machines Corp.
Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2002). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stevens, R. J. (2003). Student Team Reading and Writing: A Cooperative Learning Approach to Middle School Literacy Instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 137-160.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Tai, H. C. (2010). Attribution Theory and Writing Training: a Senior High School Classroom Research in Taiwan. Taipei: Crane.
Tai, H. C. (2012). Nursing learners attributions to their success and failure in learning English writing. Journal of Chang Gang Institute of Technology, 16(1), 140-170.
Tai, H. C. (2013). Factors influencing student nurses'' perceptions of success and failure in second language writing - A classroom-based study. Postmodern Openings, 4(2), 75-114.
Tai, H. C. (2016). Effects of collaborative online learning on EFL leaners'' writing performance and self-efficacy. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 119-133.
Tai, H. C., Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Exploring the effects of peer review and teachers'' corrective feedback on EFL students'' online writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284-309.
Tai, H. C., Pan, M. Y., & Lee, B. O. (2015). Applying technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35(6), 782-788.
Tai, H. C., Pan, M. Y., & Lee, B. O. (2016). Effects of attributional retraining in writing performance and perceived competence for university nursing learners. Nurse Education Today, 44, 66-73.
Thurston, A., Duran, D., Cunningham, E., Blanch, S., & Topping, K. (2009). International on-line reciprocal peer tutoring to promote modern language development in primary schools. Computers & Education, 53, 462-472.
Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: OUP.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Tsui, B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147-170.
Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An explanatory study of 16 Chinese writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 225-246.
Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28-36.
Weldy, T. G., Maes, J. D., & Harris, J. D. (2014). Process and practice: Improving writing ability, confidence in writing, and awareness of writing skills’importance. Journal of Innovative Education Strategies, 3(1), 13.
White, R. V. (Ed.) (1995). New ways in teaching writing. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
White, R. V., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow: Longman.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson education.
Wu, W.-C. V., Marek, M., & Chen, N.-S. (2013). Assessing cultural awareness and linguistic competency of EFL learners in a CMC-based active learning context. System, 41(3), 515-528.
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students'' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 186-193.
Yen, Y.-C., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Applying role-playing strategy to enhance learners’ writing and speaking skills in EFL courses using Facebook and Skype as learning tools: a case study in Taiwan. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 383-406.
Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.
Zhou, D. (2015). An empirical study on the application of process approach in non-English majors'' writing. English Language Teaching, 8(3), 89-96.
Zhou, H. (2015). An Empirical Study of Blog-assisted EFL process writing: Evidence from Chinese non-English majors. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 189-195.
Zimmerman, C. B., Burns, W., Burgmeier, A., Lange, R., Bixby, J., Caplan, N. A., & Adams, K. (2014). Inside Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
陳美芳, 黃楷茹, 謝佳男, & 林宜駿. (2010). 高中同儕寫作回饋的效度與效果探析. 教育科學研究期刊, 55(1), 63-90。
游春琪. (2009). 大學入學考試中心選才電子報第180期. 台北:大學入學考試中心。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE