:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:台韓之跨國技術競爭力,孰強孰弱?
作者:程琪
作者(外文):CHEN, CHI
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
指導教授:方文昌
林婷鈴
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2016
主題關鍵詞:專利分析技術創新技術機會國家技術競爭力模型patent analysistechnological innovationtechnological opportunitynational technological competitiveness model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:3
全球經貿環境瞬息萬變之際,科技實力會直接影響國家的整體競爭力,各國為了維持經濟成長,大力提倡及獎勵產業進行研究與發展,尤以產業結構為高科技產業的台灣與南韓最為相似。本研究蒐集1976年到2015年台灣與韓國在美國取得的發明型專利,比較兩國在四個期間的產業發展趨勢、技術創新能力與重要公司的變化,並採用專利組合分析,探討兩國之產業、技術與公司地位,藉由與主要競爭對手國比較,挖掘技術機會與彌補產業缺口,提升我國的創新競爭力。研究結果顯示韓國的研發速度與成果已領先台灣,並且台灣的技術能力偏重在半導體,韓國則是均衡多元化發展,以及台灣對跨國研發合作意願高,韓國則偏向資源集中且保守態度,總體而言,台灣的專利品質水準較韓國高,其研究結果可作為政府與決策制定者擬定產業政策之重要參考依據。
Faced with the global competition, scientific and technological strength will directly affect the country's overall competitiveness. Various countries in order to sustain economic growth, thus to vigorously promote and reward industrial research and development, particularly for the high-tech industrial structure of Taiwan and South Korea, both of them are similar. This study collected the invention patent from 1976 to 2015 in Taiwan and South Korea, which are acquired from the United States, as to compare the industrial development trend, technological innovation capability and changes of significant company to the two countries in four periods, as well as adopting patent portfolio analysis as to understand the industry, technology and corporation position of the two countries. By the comparison with the main competitor country, mining the technological opportunities and make up the gaps of industries as to enhance our innovative competitiveness. The results demonstrate that the R&D speed and outcomes in South Korea has been leading Taiwan, and Taiwan emphasis on technological capacity in the semiconductor, South Korea is a balanced development of diversification. Otherwise, Taiwan has high R&D cooperation willingness, South Korea tends to focus resources and conservative attitude. Overall, the patent quality in Taiwan is better than South Korea. Finally, according to the research results of the study, which can be available as the reference for the governments and decision-makers to develop the industrial policy.
1.Abraham, B. P. and Moitra, S. D. (2001). Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 21(4), 245-252.
2.Acs, Z. J., Anselin, L., and Varga, A. (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069-1085.
3.Amidon, D. M. (1996). The challenge of fifth generation R&D. Research Technology Management, 39(4), 33-41.
4.Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., and Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725-740.
5.Ashton, W. B. and Sen, R. K. (1989). Using patent information in technology business plannin-II. Research Technology Management, 32(1), 36-42.
6.Basberg, B. (1987). Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 16, 131-141.
7.Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Sabate, F. and Canabate, A. (2012). A brokering knowledge from university to the marketplace: the role of knowledge transfer offices. Management Decision, 50(7), 1285-1307.
8.Bessen, J. (2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37, 932-945.
9.Bessen, J. (2009). Estimates of Patent Rents from Firm Market Value. Research Policy, 38, 1604-1616.
10.Blazsek, S. and Escribano, A. (2010). Knowledge spillovers in US patent: a dynamic patent intensity model with secret common innovation factors. Journal of Econometrics, 159(1), 14-32.
11.Boer, H. and During, W. E. (2001). Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product, process and organizational innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(1-3), 83-107.
12.Boland, R. J. and Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372
13.Bontis, N. (2004). National intellectual capital index: a United Nations initiative for the Arab region. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(1), 13-39.
14.Brockhoff, K. (1992). Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms. Technovation, 12(1), 41-58.
15.Chang, S. B. (2012). Using patent analysis to establish technological position: two different strategic approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 3-15.
16.Cho, T. S. and Shih, H. Y. (2011). Patent citation network analysis of core and emerging technologies in Taiwan: 1997–2008. Scientometrics, 89(3), 795-811.
17.Choi, D., Lee, S. and Kim, T. (2012). The complementarities and contextual ties of corporate R&D strategies: an empirical analysis of Korean manufacturing industry. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(3), 311-333.
18.Coccia, M. (2009). What is the optimal rate of R&D investment to maximize productivity growth? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(3), 433-446.
19.Cohen, W. M. and Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In (R. C. Schmalensee and R. Willig, Eds.) Handbook of Industrial Organization Vo1. II. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V.
20.Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
21.Danthine, J. P. and Jin, X. (2007). Intangible capital, corporate valuation and asset pricing. Economic Theory, 32(1), 157-177.
22.Desyllas, P. and Hughes, A. (2009). The revealed preferences of high technology acquirers: an analysis of the innovation characters of their targets. Combridge Journal of Ecnomics, 33(6), 1089-1111.
23.Dosi, G. (1984). Technical Change and Industrial Transformation, London: Macmillan.
24.Drucker, P. F. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York, NY: Butterworth Heinemann.
25.Dzinkowski, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: an introduction. Management Accounting, 78(2), 32-36.
26.Ernst, H. (1997). The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 9(4), 361-381.
27.Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15(4), 279-308.
28.Faber, J. and Hesen, A. B. (2004). Innovation capabilities of European nation’s cross-national analyses of patents and sales of product innovations. Research Policy, 33(2), 193-207.
29.Fischer, T. and Leidinger, J. (2014). Testing patent value indicators on directly observed patent value - an empirical analysis of ocean tomo patent auctions. Research Policy, 43(3), 519-529.
30.Fung, M. L. (2005). Are knowledge spillovers driving the convergence of productivity among firms? Economica, 72, 287-305.
31.Gao, X., Guo, X. and Guan, J. (2014). An analysis of the patenting activities and collaboration among industry-university-research institutes in Chinese ICT sector. Scientometrics, 98(1), 247-263.
32.Goldenberg, D. H. and Linton, J. D. (2012). The patent paradox - new insights through decision support using compound options. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 180-185.
33.Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicator: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
34.Guan, J. and Chen, K. (2010). Measuring the innovation production process: across-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation, 30(5-6), 348-358.
35.Gurmu, S. and Pérez-Sebastián, F. (2008). Patents, R&D and lag effects: evidence from flexible methods for count panel data on manufacturing firms. Empirical Economics, 35(3), 507-526.
36.Haas, R. W. (1989). Industrial Marketing Management: Texts and Cases, 4th ed. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company, 63-86.
37.Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
38.Han, D. and Han, I. (2004). Prioritization and selection of intellectual capital measurement indicators using analytic hierarchy process for the mobile telecommunications industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(4), 519-527.
39.Hargadon, A. and Fanelli, A. (2002). Action and possibility: reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 13(3), 290-302.
40.Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716-749.
41.Hennings, K. H. (1987). Capital as a factor of production. In J. Easwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Eds.), The New Palgrave: Capital Theory, New York: W W Norton & Co Inc.
42.Hwang, J. T. and Kim, B. K. (2006). Analysis on the multi-technology capabilities of Korea and Taiwan using patent biblometrics. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 14(2), 183-199.
43.Hwang, S. N. and Hsu, S. S. (2014). Constructing R&D efficiency evaluation model with time-lag effect: an empirical study of IC industry in Taiwan. Journal of Technology Management, 19(1), 23-50. (in Chinese)
44.Jaffe, A. B. and Trajtenberg, M. (2002).Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.Jung, S. and Imm, K. Y. (2002). The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: a comparative case of patent statistics. World Patent Information, 24(4), 303-311.
46.Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions form innovation in organizations’, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
47.Karvonen, M. and Kässi, T. (2012).Patent citations as a tool for analysing the early stages of convergence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1094-1107.
48.Kim, E., Cho, Y. and Kim, W. (2014). Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: patent citation network. Scientometrics, 98(2), 975-998.
49.Kim, Y., Song, K. and Lee, J. (1993).Determinants of technological innovation in the small firms of Korea. R&D Management, 23(3), 215-226.
50.Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185-205.
51.Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
52.Krafft, J., Quatraro, F. and Saviotti, P. P. (2011). The knowledge-base evolution in biotechnology: a social network analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20(5), 445-475.
53.Lee, C. Y. and Huang, Y. C. (2012). Knowledge stock, ambidextrous learning, and firm performance: evidence form technologically intensive industries. Management Decision, 50(6), 1096-1116.
54.Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L. and Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extend two-stage network structure. International Journal of Management Science, 40(5), 611-618.
55.Lilien, G. L. and Yoon, E. (1989). Determinants of new industrial product performance: a strategic reexamination of the empirical literature. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36(1), 3-10.
56.Lin, B. W., Lee, Y. and Hung, S. C. (2006). R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685.
57.Liu, C., Shan, W. and Yu, J. (2011). Shaping the interdisciplinary knowledge network of China: A network analysis based on citation data from 1981 to 2010. Scientometrics, 89(1), 89-106.
58.Liu, J. S. and Lu, W. M. (2010). DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance. International Journal of Management Science, 38(6), 453-464.
59.Liu, L. and Cao, C. (2014). Who owns the intellectual property rights to Chinese genetically modified rice? Evidence from patent portfolio analysis. Biotechnology Law Report, 33(5), 181-192.
60.Lutolf-Carroll, C. and Prines, A. (2009). From innovation to cash flows: value creation by structuring high technology alliances, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
61.Mahmood, I. P. and Singh, J. (2003). Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy, 32, 1031-1054.
62.Martino, J. P. (1993). Technological Forecasting for Decision Making, New York: McGraw-Hill.
63.Martino, J. P. (2003). A review of selected recent advances in technological forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70, 719-733.
64.Mathews, J. A. and Hu, M. C. (2007). Enhancing the role of universities in building national innovative capacity in Asia: The case of Taiwan. World Development, 25, 245-264.
65.Mitchell, G. R. (1999). Global technology policies for economic growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60(3), 205-214.
66.Moser, M. R. (1985). Measuring performance in R&D settings. Research Technology Management, 28(5), 31-33.
67.Motwani, J., Dandridge, T., Jiang, J. and Soderquist, K. (1999). Managing innovation in French small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(2), 106-114.
68.Nelson, A. J. (2009). Measuring knowledge spillovers: what patents, licenses and publications reveal about innovation diffusion. Research Policy, 38, 994-1005.
69.Nelson, H. (1982). R&D spending: economy dims spending-being hopes. Industry Week, Cleveland, 212, 28-31.
70.OECD (1996), The Knowledge-based Economy. Paris.
71.Park, G. and Park, Y. (2006).On the measurement of patent stock as knowledge indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73, 793-812.
72.Park, K. H. and Lee, K. (2006).Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), 147-175.
73.Pavitt, K. (1988). Uses and abuses of patent statistics, In A. F. J. van Raan(Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 509-536.
74.Petruzzelli, A. M., Rotolo, D. and Albino, V. (2015). Determinants of patent citations in biotechnology: an analysis of patent influence across the industrial and organizational boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 208-221.
75.Pilkington, A., Romano, D. and Omid, T. (2002). The electric vehicle: patent data as indicators of technological development. World Patent Information, 24(1), 5-12.
76.Porter, A. L. and Cunningham, S. W. (2005). Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage. New York, NY: Wiley.
77.Reitzig, M. and Puranam, P. (2009). Value appropriation as an organizational capability: the case of IP protection through patents. Strategic Management Journal, 30(7), 765-789.
78.Roos, J. (1998). Exploring the concept of intellectual capital (IC). Long Range Planning, 31(1), 150-153.
79.Roussel, P. A., Saadand, K. N., and Erickson, T. J. (1991).The evolution of third generation R&D. Planning Review, Chicago, 19(2), 18-26.
80.Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economics Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
81.Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
82.Schumpter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
83.Simmie, J. (1998). Reasons for the development of ‘Islands of innovation’: evidence from Hertfordshire. Urban Studies, 35(8), 1261-1289.
84.Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J. and Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 346-357.
85.Trappey, A. J. C. and Trappey, C. V. (2008).An R&D knowledge management method for patent document summarization. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108(2), 245-257.
86.Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
87.Wang, E. C. and Huang, W. C. (2007). Relative efficiency of R&D activities: a cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach. Research Policy, 36(2), 260-273.
88.Wang, M. Y. and Hsu, S. S. (2005). A modified method for patent portfolio analysis: a study on magnetic random access memory technology. Journal of Technology Management, 10(3), 97-120. (in Chinese)
89.Weick, K. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 41-74.
90.Wong, C. Y. and Wang, L. (2015). Trajectories of science and technology and their co-evolution in BRICS: Insights from publication and patent analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 90-101.
91.Wu, J. and Shanley, M. T. (2009). Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 474-483.
92.Zha, X. and Chen, M. (2010). Study on early warning of competitive technical intelligence based on the patent map. Journal of Computers, 5(2), 274-281.
93.Zheng, J., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D. Z. and Huang, M. H. (2014). International collaboration development in Nanotechnology: a perspective of patent network analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 683-702.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top