|
參考文獻
著作
1.Addison, N., Burgess, L., Steers, J., and Trowell, J. (2010), Understanding Art Education: Engaging Reflexively With Practice, Abingdon: Routledge.
2.Alexander, C. (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Vol. 5), Boston: Harvard University Press.
3.Archer, L. B. (1965), Systematic Method for Designers. London: Council of Industrial Design.
4.Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking, Oakland: Univ of California Press.
5.Ashton, K. (2015), How to Fly A Horse: The Secret History of Creation, Invention, and Discovery. New York: Doubleday
6.Banham, R. (1980), Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.Baskinger, M. and Bardel, W. (2013), Drawing Ideas: A Hand-Drawn Approach for Better Design, New York: Watson-Guptill.
8.Betts, P. (2004), The Authority of Everyday Objects: A Cultural History of West German Industrial Design (Vol. 34), Oakland: Univ of California Press.
9.Brown, T. (2009), Change By Design : How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation / 1st Ed, New York: Harper Business.
10.Burden, P. R. and Byrd, D. M. (2003), Methods for Effective Teaching. Boston:Pearson Education.
11.Cagan, J. and Vogel, C. M. (2002), Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation From Product Planning to Program Approval, Upper Saddle River: Ft Press.
12.Cairo, A. (2012), The Functional Art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization. San Francisco: New Riders.
13.Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D. and Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in Information Visualization - Using Vision to Think, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
14.Carr-Saunders, A. M. (1928), Professions: Their Organization and Place in Society, Wotton-under-Edge: Clarendon Press.
15.Christianson, S. (2012), 100 Diagrams That Changed the World, Beijing: Penguin China.
16.Condivi, A., Wohl, H. and Wohl, A. S. (1999), The Life of Michel-Angelo, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
17.Covi, D. A. (2005), Andrea del Verrocchio: Life and Work, Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
18.Cross, N. (2011), Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work, New York: Berg.
19.Dewey, J. (1916), Democracy and Education, New York: Macmillan.
20.Dewey, J. (2007), Experience and Education, New York: Simon and Schuster.
21.Dewey, J. (1998), How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22.Dreyfuss, H. (1984), Symbol Sourcebook: An Authoritative Guide to International Graphic Symbols, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
23.Dreyfuss, H. (2003), Designing For People, New York: Skyhorse Publishing Inc.
24.Edsall, L. (2003), Concept Cars: From the 1930s to the Present, New York: Barnes & Noble.
25.Eisenman, P. (1999), Peter Eisenman: Diagram Diaries, London: Thames & Hudson.
26.Eissen, K. and Steur, R. (2014), Sketching: Product Design Presentation, Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
27.Fiedler, J., and Feierabend, P. (2013), Bauhaus. Potsdam: h.f.ullmann publishing.
28.Forty, A. (1995), Objects of Desire: Design and Society Since 1750, London: Thames and Hudson.
29.Frayling, C. (1987), The Royal College of Art: One Hundred & Fifty Years of Art & Design, London: Vintage.
30.Gagne, R. M., and Briggs, L. J. (1974), Principles of Instructional Design, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
31.Gartman, D. (2012), From Autos to Architecture: Fordism and Architectural Aesthetics in The Twentieth Century, San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
32.Giedion, S. (2014), Mechanization Takes Command A Contribution to Anonymous History, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.Ginsburg, H. P., and Opper, S. (1988), Piaget''s Theory of Intellectual Development, Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
34.Haeckel, E. (2017), The Art and Science of Ernst Haeckel. Kӧln: Taschen GmbH.
35.Hanington, B., and Martin, B. (2012), Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions, Beverly: Rockport Publishers.
36.Hochgerg, J. (1972), Art, Perception and Reality, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.Hubka, V., and Eder, W. E. (2012), Design Science: Introduction to the Needs, Scope and Organization of Engineering Design Knowledge, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
38.Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995), Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science, Boston: A Bradford Book.
39.Kimura, K. (2010), Infographics, Toykyo: Seibundo Shinkosha.
40.Klanten, R., Ehmann, S., Schulze, F. and Losowsky, A. (2011), Visual storytelling : inspiring a new visual language, Berlin : Gestalten.
41.Koberg, D. and Bagnall, J. (2003), The Universal Traveler: A Soft-Systems Guide to Creativity, Problem-Solving, and the Process of Reaching Goals, Menlo Park: Crisp Learning.
42.Krum, R. (2014), Cool Infographics: Effective Communication with Data Visualization and Design, Hoboken: Wiley.
43.Lankow, J., Ritchie, J. and Crooks, R. (2012), Infographics: The Power of Visual Storytelling, Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
44.Lawson, B. (2006), How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, Abingdon: Routledge.
45.Lawson, B. (2012), What Designers Know, Abingdon: Routledge.
46.Lester, P. M. (2013), Visual Communication: Images with Messages, Boston: Cengage Learning.
47.Lindinger, H. (1991), Ulm Design: The Morality of Objects. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.Lindstrom, M. (2017), Small Data: The Tiny Clues That Uncover Huge Trends. London: Picador.
49.Lockwood, T. (2010), Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value, New York: Skyhorse Publishing Inc.
50.Lupton, E. (2014), Beautiful users: designing for people, San Francisco: Chronicle Books.
51.Manzini, E., and Coad, R. (2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, Design Thinking, Design Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.
52.Margolin, V. (1995), The Product Milieu and Social Action (Vol. 122), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.Medina, J. (2014), Brain Rules : 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School, Edinburgh: Canongate Books.
54.Mendelsund, P. (2014), What We See When We Read, New York: Vintage.
55.Mieczkowski, Y. (2005), Gerald Ford and the Challenges of the 1970s, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
56.Miller, P. H. (2002), Theories of Developmental Psychology, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
57.Moholy-Nagy, L. (2012), The New Vision: Fundamentals of Bauhaus Design, Painting, Sculpture, and Architecture, North Chelmsford: Courier Corporation.
58.Moore, W. E. (1970), The Professions: Roles and rules, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
59.Morris, R. (2009), The Fundamentals of Product Design, Worthing: AVA Publishing.
60.Mumford, L. (2010), Technics and Civilization, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.Munari, B. (2010), Da Cosa Nasce Cosa. Appunti Per Una Metodologia Progettuale, Italy: Laterza.
62.Neurath, M. and Kinross, R. (2008), Transformer: Principles of Making Isotype Charts, London: Hyphen Press.
63.Norman, D. (2013), The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition, New York: Basic Books.
64.Norman, D. A. (2010), Living with Complexity, Cambridge: MIT Press.
65.Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill.
66.Otto, K. N., and Wood, K. (2001), Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
67.Pahl, G., Wallace, K., Blessing, L. T. M., Beitz, W. and Bauert, F. (2013), Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, London: Springer.
68.Papanek, V. (2005), Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, Chicago: Chicago Review Press.
69.Pevsner, N. (2005), Pioneers of modern design: from William Morris to Walter Gropius, New Haven: Yale University Press.
70.Piaget, J. (1973), To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education, New York: Grossman Publishers.
71.Piaget, J. (2013), The Mechanisms of Perception, Abingdon: Routledge.
72.Raizman, D. (2003), History of Modern Design: Graphics and Products Since The Industrial Revolution, London: Laurence King Publishing.
73.Ramachandran, V. S. (2011), The Tell-Tale Brain : Unlocking the Mystery of Human Nature, London: Windmill Books.
74.Reigeluth, C. M. (2013), Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status, Abingdon: Routledge.
75.Rendgen, S. and Wiedemann, J. (2014), Understanding The World : The Atlas Of Infographics, Köln : Taschen.
76.Rendgen, S., Ciuccarelli, P., Holmes, N., Rogers, S., Wiedemann, J. and Wurman, R. S. (2012), Information Graphics, Köln: Taschen.
77.Roam, D. (2009), Unfolding the Napkin: The hands-on method for solving complex problems with simple pictures, London: Penguin.
78.Robert, S. (2007), Information Visualization-Design for Interaction, UK: Pearson Educated Limited.
79.Rodgers, P., and Milton, A. (2011), Product Design, London: Laurence King Publishing.
80.Rowe, P. G. (1991), Design Thinking, Cambridge: MIT Press.
81.Schein, E. H., and Kommers, D. W. (1972), Professional Education: Some New Directions. Hightstown: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
82.Schön, D. A. (1987), Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, Hoboken: Jossey-Bass.
83.Schön, D. A. (2017), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Abingdon: Routledge.
84.Shedroff, N. (2009), Design is the Problem: The Future of Design Must be Sustainable, New York: Rosenfeld Media.
85.Sheldon, R. and Arens, E. (1932), Consumer Engineering: A new Technique for Prosperity, New York: Harper.
86.Sheumaker, H., and Wajda, S. T. (2008), Material Culture in America: Understanding Everyday Life, Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
87.Sibbet, D. (2011), Visual Teams: Graphic Tools for Commitment, Innovation, and High Performance. Hoboken: Wiley.
88.Silver, N. and Cook, G. (2014), The Best American Infographics 2014, Boston : Mariner Books.
89.Simon, H. A. (1996), The Sciences of the Artificial (Vol. 3rd ed). Cambridge: MIT Press.
90.Smiciklas, M. (2012), The Power of Infographics: Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect With Your Audiences, Indianapolis: Indiana Que Publishing.
91.Sparke, P. (2009), Domestic Design. London: BBC.
92.Sparke, P. (2009), The Genius of Design, London: Quadrille Publishing Limited.
93.Sparke, P. (2013), An Introduction to Design and Culture: 1900 to the Present, Abingdon: Routledge.
94.Sparke, P., Hodges, F. and Coad, E. D. (1989), Design Source Book, Secaucus: Chartwell Books
95.Spence, R. (2007), Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition), Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
96.Spitz, R. (2002), Hfg Ulm: The View behind the Foreground: The Political History of the Ulm School of Design, 1953-1968, Fellbach: Edition Axel Menges.
97.Stickdorn, M., Schneider, J., Andrews, K., and Lawrence, A. (2011), This is Service Design Thinking: Basics, Tools, Cases (Vol. 1), Hoboken: Wiley.
98.Tilley, A. R. and Henry Dreyfuss Associates (2001), The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design, Hoboken: Wiley.
99.Tzeng, G.-H. and Huang, J.-J. (2011), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Boca Raton: CRC press.
100.Ulrich, K. T. (2003), Product Design and Development, Boston: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
101.Van Boeijen, A., Daalhuizen, J., Zijlstra, J., and van der Schoor, R. (2014), Delft Design Guide: Design Strategies and Methods, Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
102.Veblen, T. (2015), The Higher Learning in America: The Annotated Edition, Baltimore: JHU Press.
103.Wang, K. (2015), Infographic Design In Media, Mulgrave: Images Publishing.
104.Weinschenk, S. (2011), 100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People, Berkeley: New Riders.
105.Whiteley, N. (1997), Design for Society, Islington: Reaktion books.
106.Whitford, F. (1984), Bauhaus. London: Thames and Hudson London.
107.Wildbur, P., and Burke, M. (1998), Information Graphics : Innovative Solutions In Contemporary Design, London : Thames and Hudson.
108.Willcox, M. (2015), The Business of Choice: Marketing to Consumers'' Instincts Indianapolis: Pearson FT Press.
109.Wurman, R. S. (1989), Information Anxiety. New York: Doubleday.
110.代福平（2015），《信息可視化設計》，重慶：西南師範大學出版社。
111.周博（2014），《現代設計倫理思想史》，北京：北京大學出版社。
112.杭間、靳埭强、胡恩威（2014），《包豪斯道路歷史、遺澤、世界與中國》，濟南：山東美術出版社。
113.林震岩（2007），《多變量分析 : SPSS的操作與應用》，臺北：智勝文化出版。
114.迪人（2009），《世界是設計的》，北京：中國青年出版社。
115.唐麗英、王春和（2005），《STATISTICA 6.0版與基礎統計分析》，臺北：儒林。
116.孫皓瓊（2011），《圖形對話：什麽是信息設計》，北京：清華大學出版社。
117.袁烽（2016），《從圖解思維到數字建造》，上海：同濟大學出版社。
118.盛群力（2010），《現代教育設計論》，杭州：浙江教育出版社。
119.許江、靳埭强（2014），《遺産與更新：中國設計教育反思》，濟南：山東美術出版社。
120.許喜華（2008），《工業設計概論》，北京：北京理工大學出版社。
121.曾坤明、曾逸展（2008），《產品設計：歷史與挑戰》，臺北市：五南。
122.涂子沛（2012），《大數據：正在到來的數據革命、以及它如何改變政府、商業與我們的生活》，南寧：廣西師範大學出版社。
123.鄧振源（2012），《多準則决策分析方法與應用》，臺北市：鼎茂圖書。
譯著
1.何道寬譯（2015），《社會傳播的結構與功能》，Lasswell, H. 原著（1948），北京：中國傳媒大學出版社。
2.宋俊嶺、倪文彥譯（2014），《城市發展史——起源、演變和前景》Mumford, L. 原著（1961），北京：中國建築工業出版社。
3.李本正、范景中譯（2000），《文藝復興：西方藝術的偉大時代》，Gombrich, E. H. 原著（1986），杭州：浙江美術學院出版社。
4.李淑寧譯（2010），《經典設計150年》，Bony, A. 原著（2004），臺北市：馬可孛羅文化。
5.盛楊燕譯（2013），《大數據時代：生活、工作與思維的大變革》，Mayer-Schönberger, V. & Cukier, K.原著（2013），杭州：浙江人民出版社。
6.陳雪清、于曉紅譯（2012），《爲人的設計》，Deryfuss, H. 原著（1955），南京： 譯林出版社。
7.賀莉譯（2013），《信息可視化設計》，Wang, K. 原著（2013），瀋陽：遼寧科學技術出版社。
8.楊成凱、李本正、范景中譯（2012），《藝術與錯覺——圖像再現的心理學研究》，Gombrich, E. H. 原著（1960），南寧：廣西美術出版社。
9.楊思梁、徐一維、范景中譯（2015），《秩序感——裝飾藝術的心理學研究》，Gombrich, E. H. 原著（1979），南寧： 廣西美術出版社。
10.楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園 （2006），《社會及行為科學研究法》，重慶：重慶大學出版社。
11.趙璐、杜海濱譯（2016），《設計教育 教育設計》，Lehmann, K. 原著（2016），南京：江蘇鳳凰美術出版社。
12.鄧超譯（2016），《佐藤大：用設計解决問題》，Oki Sato 原著（2013），北京： 北京時代華文書局。
13.盧浚譯（2015），《皮亞傑教育論著選》，Piaget, J. 原著（1983），北京：人民教育出版社。
期刊論文
1.Adams, E. (2017), Thinking Drawing. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(3), pp. 244-252.
2.Adams, R. S., Cardella, M., & Purzer, Ş. (2016), Analyzing design review conversations: Connecting design knowing, being and coaching. Design Studies, 45, pp. 1-8.
3.Adams, R. S., Forin, T., Chua, M., & Radcliffe, D. (2016), Characterizing the work of coaching during design reviews. Design Studies, 45, pp. 30-67.
4.Agouridas, V. and Race, P. (2007), Enhancing knowledge management in design education through systematic reflection practice. Concurrent Engineering, 15(1), pp. 63-76.
5.Appiah, E. and Cronjé, J. C. (2012), Thumbnail sketches on idea development: The drawing board vs computer generation, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 11(1), pp. 49-61.
6.Archer, L. B. (1979), Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), pp. 17-20.
7.Atilola, O., Tomko, M. and Linsey, J. S. (2016), The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees, Design Studies, 42, pp. 110-136.
8.Barrett, P. S., Hudson, J. and Stanley, C. (1999), Good practice in briefing: The limits of rationality, Automation in Construction, 8(6), pp. 633-642.
9.Bell, Q. (1964), The schools of design. British Journal of Educational Studies, 12(2), pp. 218-219.
10.Belluigi, D. Z. (2016), Constructions of roles in studio teaching and learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(1), pp. 21-35.
11.Blakey, S. and McFadyen, J. (2015), Curiosity over conformity: The Maker''s Palette - a case for hands-on learning. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 14(2), pp. 131-143.
12.Blizzard, J. L., and Klotz, L. E. (2012), A framework for sustainable whole systems design. Design Studies, 33(5), pp. 456-479.
13.Boehm, S. (2015), Facilitating comprehension, connection and commitment to environmentally responsible design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(1), pp. 73-88.
14.Bremner, C. and Rodgers, P. (2013), Design without discipline. Design Issues, 29(3), pp. 4-13.
15.Brown, T. (2005), Strategy by design. Fast Company, 95, pp. 52-54.
16.Brown, T. and Wyatt, J. (2010), Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.
17.Buchanan, R. (1992), Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), pp. 5-21.
18.Budge, K. (2016), Learning to be: the modelling of art and design practice in university art and design teaching. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(2), pp. 243-258.
19.Caldwell, E. and Gregory, J. (2016), Internationalizing the art school: What part does the studio have to play? Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(2), pp. 117-133.
20.Calvo, M. (2017), Reflective Drawing as a Tool for Reflection in Design Research. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(3), pp. 261-272.
21.Cardoso, C. and Badke-Schaub, P. (2011), The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), pp. 130-146.
22.Cartmell, M. P. (1995), Design brief expansion: Process validation issues, Journal of Engineering Design, 6(1), pp. 17-29.
23.Cash, P., Hicks, B. and Culley, S. (2015), Activity Theory as a means for multi-scale analysis of the engineering design process: A protocol study of design in practice, Design Studies, 38, pp. 1-32.
24.Chen, W. (2016), Exploring the learning problems and resource usage of undergraduate industrial design students in design studio courses. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 26(3), pp. 461-487.
25.Çifçi, T. (2016), Effects of infographics on students achievement and attitude towards geography lessons, Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), pp. 154-166.
26.Cocchiarella, F. and Booth, P. (2015), Students as producers: an ''X'' disciplinary client-based approach to collaborative art, design and media pedagogy. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(3), pp. 326-335.
27.Coorey, J. (2016), Active learning methods and technology: strategies for design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(3), pp. 337-347.
28.Crick, K. and Hartling, L. (2015), Preferences of knowledge users for two formats of summarizing results from systematic reviews: infographics and critical appraisals. PLoS ONE, 10(10), pp. 1-8.
29.Crilly, N. (2015), Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers, Design Studies, 38, pp. 54-91.
30.Cross, N. (1985), Styles of learning, designing and computing. Design Studies, 6(3), pp. 157-162.
31.Cross, N. (1990), The nature and nurture of design ability. Design Studies, 11(3), pp. 127-140.
32.Cross, N. (2001), Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science. Design Issues, 17(3), pp. 49-55.
33.Cross, N. (2004), Expertise in design: An overview, Design Studies, 25(5), pp. 427-441.
34.Cummings, A. (2011)，〈對藝術家和設計師的教育英國皇家藝術學院研究生培養模式〉，設計，第23卷，第2期，頁80-85，北京。
35.de Bont, C., and Xihui Liu, S. (2017), Breakthrough Innovation through Design Education: Perspectives of Design-Led Innovators. Design Issues, 33(2), pp. 18-30.
36.de Eyto, A., Mc Mahon, M., Hadfield, M. and Hutchings, M. (2008), Strategies for developing sustainable design practice for students and SME professionals. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), pp. 331-342.
37.de la Cruz, L. A., and Mejía, G. M. (2017), Reflective didactic strategy to integrate semiotic theory and creative practice in graphic design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 83-97.
38.Deininger, M., Daly, S. R., Sienko, K. H., and Lee, J. C. (2017), Novice designers'' use of prototypes in engineering design. Design Studies, 51, pp. 25-65.
39.Design & Technology Association (2014), Action research to develop and validate a scheme of work to promote creativity and designerly thinking through play, Design & Technology Education, 19, pp. 17-29.
40.Dick, M. (2014), Interactive infographics and news values. Digital Journalism, 2(4), pp. 490-506.
41.Dong, A., Garbuio, M., and Lovallo, D. (2016), Generative sensing in design evaluation. Design Studies, 45, pp. 68-91.
42.Dorst, K. (2011), The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application, Design Studies, 32(6), pp. 521-532.
43.Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001), Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution, Design Studies, 22(5), pp. 425-437.
44.Dreamson, N. (2017), Online collaboration in design education: an experiment in real-time manipulation of prototypes and communication. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), pp. 188-199.
45.Dunlap, J. C. and Lowenthal, P. R. (2016), Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics, Journal of Visual Literacy, 35(1), pp. 42-59.
46.Eder, W. E. (2011), Engineering design science and theory of technical systems: Legacy of Vladimir Hubka, Journal of Engineering Design, 22(5), pp. 361-385.
47.Ellmers, G. (2017), Connecting learning from the graphic design project with thinking about approaches to design practice. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 69-82.
48.Emmanouil, M. (2015), Human-centred design projects and co-design in/outside the Turkish classroom: responses and challenges. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(3), pp. 358-368.
49.Fava, M. (2017), Drawing analogies to deepen learning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(3), pp. 315-324.
50.Fieldsend-Danks, P. (2016), The Dialogues project: Students as partners in developing research-engaged learning. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(1), pp. 89-102.
51.Firth, R., Stoltenberg, E., and Jennings, T. (2016), Using an outdoor learning space to teach sustainability and material processes in the product design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(3), pp. 327-336.
52.Frascara, J. (2017), Design, and design education: how can they get together? Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 125-131.
53.Friedman, K. (2012), Models of design: Envisioning a future design education. Visible language, 46(1/2), pp. 132.
54.Gale, C. (2017), #AlternativeArtschool // an interstitial space for creative dissent. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 99-115.
55.Gartman, D. (1994), Harley Earl and the Art and Color Section: The birth of styling at General Motors. Design Issues, 10(2), pp. 3-26.
56.Giloi, S., and Belluigi, D. Z. (2017), Underlying knowledge-knower structures in graphic design: Contributing to establishing a cohesive language for use in graphic design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 7-22.
57.Goatman, M. and Moody, L. (2014), The changing nature and definitions of industrial design and implications for prospective undergraduate students, Design & Technology Education, 19(1), pp. 21-29.
58.Goldschmidt, G. (2007), To see eye to eye: The role of visual representations in building shared mental models in design teams, CoDesign, 3(1), pp. 43-50.
59.Guler, K., and Atalayer, F. (2016), Assessing visual skill development in basic design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(1), pp. 71-88.
60.Haines-Gadd, M., Hasegawa, A., Hooper, R., Huck, Q., Pabian, M., Portillo, C., Zheng, L., Williams, L. and McBride, A. (2015), Cut the crap; design brief to pre-production in eight weeks: Rapid development of an urban emergency low-tech toilet for Oxfam, Design Studies, 40, pp. 246-268.
61.Harder, M. K., Burford, G., and Hoover, E. (2013), What is participation? Design leads the way to a cross-disciplinary framework. Design Issues, 29(4), pp. 41-57.
62.Hargrove, R., and Rice, A. (2015), The challenge of beginning. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(2), pp. 159-168.
63.Harland, R. (2017), Some important things to say about graphic design education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 3-6.
64.Haupt, G. (2018), Hierarchical thinking: a cognitive tool for guiding coherent decision making in design problem solving. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 28(1), pp. 207-237.
65.Hey, J. H., Joyce, C. K. and Beckman, S. L. (2007), Framing innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases, Journal of Design Research, 6(1-2), pp. 79-99.
66.Hsiao, S.-W., Wang, M.-F., and Chen, C.-W. (2017), Time pressure and creativity in industrial design. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(2), pp. 271-289.
67.Hu, Y.-C., Chiu, Y.-J., Hsu, C.-S. and Chang, Y.-Y. (2015), Identifying key factors for introducing GPS-based fleet management systems to the logistics industry, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, pp. 1-14.
68.Hung, H., Chu, P., Liu, Y., and Wu, C. (2017), Effects of various sketching tools on visual thinking in idea development. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(2), pp. 291-306.
69.Huppatz, D. J. (2015), Revisiting Herbert Simon''s "Science of Design". Design Issues, 31(2), pp. 29-40.
70.Jones, J. C., and Jacobs, D. (1998), PhD research in design. Design Studies, 19(1), pp. 5-7.
71.Kaiser, H. F. (1970), A second generation little jiffy, Psychometrika, 35(4), pp. 401-415.
72.Kamara, J. M., Anumba, C. J. and Evbuomwan, N. F. O. (2001), Assessing the suitability of current briefing practices in construction within a concurrent engineering framework, International Journal of Project Management, 19(6), pp. 337-351.
73.Kärnä-Behm, J. (2016), Promoting design probes in interior design and in the user-centred analysis of a space in the context of Finnish higher education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(2), pp. 175-189.
74.Kealy-Morris, E. (2015), The bookbinding workshop: making as collaborative pedagogic practice. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 14(2), pp. 119-129.
75.Kelley, T., and Sung, E. (2017), Sketching by design: teaching sketching to young learners. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(3), pp. 363-386.
76.Kim, E. and Kim, K. (2015), Cognitive styles in design problem solving: Insights from network-based cognitive maps, Design Studies, 40, pp. 1-38.
77.Kim, H., and Lee, H. (2016), Cognitive activity-based design methodology for novice visual communication designers. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(2), pp. 196-212.
78.Kim, M. J., Ju, S. R., and Lee, L. (2015), A cross-cultural and interdisciplinary collaboration in a joint design studio. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(1), pp. 102-120.
79.Kleinsmann, M. and Valkenburg, R. (2008), Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects, Design Studies, 29(4), pp. 369-386.
80.Kolko, J. (2015), Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), pp. 66-71.
81.Kruger, C., and Cross, N. (2006), Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes. Design Studies, 27(5), pp. 527-548.
82.Kullman, K. (2016), Prototyping bodies: a post-phenomenology of wearable simulations. Design Studies, 47, pp. 73-90.
83.Kurt, M., and Kurt, S. (2017), Improving design understandings and skills through enhanced metacognition: reflective design journals. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), pp. 226-238.
84.Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Kangas, K., Härkki, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2016), Textile teacher students'' collaborative design processes in a design studio setting. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 15(1), pp. 35-54.
85.Larkin, J. H. and Simon, H. A. (1987), Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words, Cognitive Science, 11(1), pp. 65-100.
86.Lee, Y. (2008), Design participation tactics: The challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process, CoDesign, 4(1), pp. 31-50.
87.Leenders, R. T. A. J., van Engelen, J. M. L. and Kratzer, J. (2003), Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), pp. 69-92.
88.Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L. and Markman, A. B. (2011), An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: Understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods, Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(3), pp. 031008-031018.
89.Lowe, R. K. (1993), Diagrammatic information: Techniques for exploring its mental repres-entation and processing, Information Design Journal, 7(1), pp. 3-17.
90.Lu, C.-C. (2017), Interactive effects of environmental experience and innovative cognitive style on student creativity in product design. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(4), pp. 577-594.
91.Lu, H.-P., Chen, J.-H., and Lee, C.-F. (2016), Supporting creative responses in design education - the development and application of the graphic design composition method. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(1), pp. 154-176.
92.Luo, S.-J., and Dong, Y.-N. (2017), Role of cultural inspiration with different types in cultural product design activities. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(3), pp. 499-515.
93.Maldonado, T. (1958), New developments in industry and the training of designers. Ulm, 2, pp. 25-48.
94.Maldonado, T. (1964), Science and design. Ulm, 10-11, pp. 10-29.
95.Manzini, E. (2016), Design culture and dialogic design. Design Issues, 32(1), pp. 52-59.
96.Margolin, V. (2013), The United States in World War II: Scientists, Engineers, Designers. Design Issues, 29(1), pp. 14-29.
97.McAuley, M., and Roxburgh, M. (2017), Learning theory through doing: Applying design studio methods in the construction of an academic argument. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 171-186.
98.McDonnell, J. (2016), Scaffolding practices: A study of design practitioner engagement in design education. Design Studies, 45, pp. 9-29.
99.Moreira, M., Murphy, E., and McAra-McWilliam, I. (2016), The emergence of an amplified mindset of design: implications for postgraduate design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(3), pp. 356-368.
100.Nascimento, S., and Pólvora, A. (2013), Opening up technologies to the social: Between interdisciplinarity and citizen participation. Design Issues, 29(4), pp. 31-40.
101.Oetting, J. (2015), The science behind why our brains crave infographics (In an Infographic), Retrieved from http://blog.hubspot.com/agency/science-brainscrave-infographics.
102.Oxman, R. (1999), Educating the designerly thinker, Design Studies, 20(2), pp. 105-122.
103.Oxman, R. (2004), Think-maps: Teaching design thinking in design education, Design Studies, 25(1), pp. 63-91.
104.Ozdamlı, F., Kocakoyun, S., Sahin, T. and Akdag, S. (2016), Statistical Reasoning of Impact of Infographics on Education, Procedia Computer Science, 102, pp. 370-377.
105.Paton, B. and Dorst, K. (2011), Briefing and reframing: A situated practice, Design Studies, 32(6), pp. 573-587.
106.Pauwels, P., De Meyer, R., & Van Campenhout, J. (2013), Design thinking support: information systems versus reasoning. Design Issues, 29(2), pp. 42-59.
107.Pedgley, O., Rognoli, V., & Karana, E. (2016), Materials experience as a foundation for materials and design education. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 26(4), pp. 613-630.
108.Pei, E., Campbell, I. and Evans, M. (2011), A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers, The Design Journal, 14(1), pp. 64-91.
109.Perttula, M. and Sipilä, P. (2007), The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation, Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), pp. 93-102.
110.Peterson, J. F., Frankham, N., McWhinnie, L., & Forsyth, G. (2015), Leading creative practice pedagogy futures. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 14(1), pp. 71-86.
111.Piaget, J. (1972), Development and learning. Readings on the development of children, pp. 25-33.
112.Poggenpohl, S. H. (2008), Design literacy, discourse and communities of practice. Visible language, 42(3), pp. 213.
113.Pollock, V. L., Alden, S., Jones, C., and Wilkinson, B. (2015), Open Studios is the beginning of a conversation: Creating critical and reflective learners through innovative feedback and assessment in Fine Art. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 14(1), pp. 39-56.
114.Rams, D. (1991), The Munich Design Charter. Design Issues, 8(1), pp. 74-77.
115.Rutherford. (2015), Improving Student Engagement in Commercial Art and Design Programmes. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(1), pp. 89-101.
116.Ryan, T. A. and Schwartz, C. B. (1956), Speed of perception as a function of mode of representation. The American Journal Of Psychology, 69(1), pp. 60-69.
117.Ryd, N. (2004), The design brief as carrier of client information during the construction process, Design Studies, 25(3), pp. 231-249.
118.Scheer, A., Noweski, C., and Meinel, C. (2012), Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).
119.Schön, D. A. (1984a), Design: a process of enquiry, experimentation and research. Design Studies, 5(3), pp. 130-131.
120.Schön, D. A. (1984b), Problems, frames and perspectives on designing. Design Studies, 5(3), pp. 132-136.
121.Schön, D. A. (1992), Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-based systems, 5(1), pp. 3-14.
122.Self, J., and Baek, J. S. (2017), Interdisciplinarity in design education: understanding the undergraduate student experience. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 27(3), pp. 459-480.
123.Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., and Cagan, J. (2015), Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, pp. 70-99.
124.Siricharoen, W. and Vinh, P. (2017), Question matrix method according to divided dimensions of infographics evaluation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 21(2), pp. 219-233.
125.Starkey, E., Toh, C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2016), Abandoning creativity: The evolution of creative ideas in engineering design course projects. Design Studies, 47, pp. 47-72.
126.Stechert, C. and Franke, H. J. (2009), Managing requirements as the core of multi-disciplinary product development, CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), pp. 153-158.
127.Steen, M. (2013), Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29(2), 16-28.
128.Stompff, G., Smulders, F., and Henze, L. (2016), Surprises are the benefits: reframing in multidisciplinary design teams. Design Studies, 47, pp. 187-214.
129.Sun, L., Xiang, W., Chen, S., and Yang, Z. (2015), Collaborative sketching in crowdsourcing design: a new method for idea generation. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 25(3), pp. 409-427.
130.Teal, R. (2010), Developing a (non-linear) practice of design thinking, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(3), pp. 294-302.
131.Thiessen, M. (2017), I don''t know, I just like it: Exploring how design students think about criticism. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(2), pp. 145-156.
132.Thompson, C. M. (2015), Creating "visual legacies": infographics as a means of interpreting and sharing research, Communication Teacher, 29(2), pp. 91-101.
133.Toh, C. A., and Miller, S. R. (2015), How engineering teams select design concepts: A view through the lens of creativity. Design Studies, 38, pp. 111-138.
134.Toth, C. (2013), Revisiting a genre: teaching infographics in business and professional communication courses, Business Communication Quarterly, 76(4), pp. 446-457.
135.Truchon, M. (2008), Borda and the maximum likelihood approach to vote aggregation, Mathematical Social Sciences, 55(1), pp. 96-102.
136.Tzeng, G.-H., Chiang, C.-H. and Li, C.-W. (2007), Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL, Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), pp. 1028-1044.
137.Uysal, V. Ş., and Topaloğlu, F. (2017), Bridging the gap: a manual primer into design computing in the context of basic design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(1), pp. 21-38.
138.Valkenburg, R., and Dorst, K. (1998), The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), pp. 249-271.
139.van Eck, D. (2015), Dissolving the ‘problem of the absent artifact’: Design representations as means for counterfactual understanding and knowledge generalisation. Design Studies, 39, pp. 1-18.
140.VanderMolen, J., and Spivey, C. (2017). Creating infographics to enhance student engagement and communication in health economics. Journal of Economic Education, 48(3), pp. 198-205.
141.Vandevelde, C., Wyffels, F., Ciocci, M.-C., Vanderborght, B., and Saldien, J. (2016), Design and evaluation of a DIY construction system for educational robot kits. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 26(4), pp. 521-540.
142.Vandevenne, D., Pieters, T., and Duflou, J. R. (2016), Enhancing novelty with knowledge-based support for Biologically-Inspired design. Design Studies, 46, pp. 152-173.
143.Visser, I., Chandler, L., & Grainger, P. (2017), Engaging creativity: Employing assessment feedback strategies to support confidence and creativity in graphic design practice. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16(1), pp. 53-67.
144.Waks, L. J. (2001), Donald Schon''s philosophy of design and design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(1), pp. 37-51.
145.West, D. (2007), A new generation. Icon, 43(January), pp. 56-64.
146.Wilson, S. E., and Zamberlan, L. (2017), Design pedagogy for an unknown future: a view from the expanding field of design scholarship and professional practice. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(1), pp. 106-117.
147.Wilson, S., and Zamberlan, L. (2015), Design for an unknown future: amplified roles for collaboration, new design knowledge, and Creativity. Design Issues, 31(2), pp. 3-15.
148.Wilson, W. H, Madsen, S. T, and Christophersen, R. (1958), Sources of art nouveau, Victorian Studies, 1(2).pp. 189-192
149.Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T. and Ball, L. J. (2013), Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design, Design Studies, 34(5), pp. 515-542.
150.Wong, J.-J., Chen, P.-Y., and Chen, C.-D. (2016), The metamorphosis of industrial designers from novices to experts. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 35(1), pp. 140-153.
151.Wormald, P. (2011), Positioning industrial design students to operate at the ''fuzzy front end'': Investigating a new arena of university design education, International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 21(4), pp. 425-447.
152.Wu, Q., and Wang, Y. (2015), To explore the effect of sub consciousness on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the sketching process of industrial design. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 25(4), pp. 563-584.
153.Wu, W.-W. (2008), Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach, Expert systems with Applications, 35(3), pp. 828-835.
154.Xiang, W., Sun, L., Chen, S., Yang, Z., and Liu, Z. (2015), The role of mental models in collaborative sketching. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 25(1), pp. 121-136.
155.Yang, M. C. (2009), Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design, Research in Engineering Design, 20(1), pp. 1-11.
156.Yang, Y.-P. O., Shieh, H.-M., Leu, J.-D. and Tzeng, G.-H. (2008), A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications, International journal of operations research, 5(3), pp. 160-168.
157.Yildirim, S. (2016), Infographics for Educational Purposes: Their Structure, Properties and Reader Approaches, Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology - Tojet, 15(3), pp. 98-110.
158.Yilmaz, S. and Seifert, C. M. (2011), Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design, Design Studies, 32(4), pp. 384-415.
159.Yilmaz, S., and Daly, S. R. (2016), Feedback in concept development: comparing design disciplines. Design Studies, 45, pp. 137-158.
160.Yu, A. T. W., Qiping, S., Kelly, J. and Hunter, K. (2008), Comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/architectural programming, Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 134(2), pp. 122-138.
161.Zeshui, X. and Cuiping, W. (1999), A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process1, European Journal of Operational Research, 116(2), pp. 443-449.
162.任娟莉（2008），〈淺談產品設計中的信息設計〉，科技信息，第26卷，第28期，頁213，濟南。
163.朱上上、潘雲鶴、羅仕鑒、莊越挺（2002），〈基於知識的産品創新設計技術研究〉，中國機械工程，第13卷，第4期，頁337-340，北京。
164.何蕾（2011），〈視覺傳達設計中的“視覺設計”與“信息設計”〉，藝術與設計，第9卷，第4期，頁31-33，北京。
165.吳中江、黃成亮（2014），〈應用型人才內涵及應用型本科人才培養〉，高等工程教育研究，第32卷，第2期，頁66-70，武漢。
166.李倩一（2011），〈就在你身邊——信息設計〉，藝術與設計，第9卷，第3期，頁39-41，北京。
167.李喻軍（2001），〈工業設計與信息設計〉，美術學報，第23卷，第2期，頁89-90，廣州。
168.杜淑幸、李建坤、楊西惠、張英（2006），〈基於材料知識的計算機輔助選材系統研究〉，機電産品開發與創新，第 19卷，第2期， 頁43-44，北京。
169.周嘉政（2015），〈標準作業流程應用於產品設計之研究〉，蘭陽學報，第14卷，第1期，宜蘭。
170.侯長林、羅靜、葉丹（2015），〈應用型大學視域下新建本科院校辦學定位選擇〉，教育研究，第37卷，第4期，頁61-69，北京。
171.唐星明（2004），〈包豪斯在中國真的過時了嗎?——致翟墨先生〉，美術觀察，第5期，頁29-30，北京。
172.孫晨燕、敬石開、劉海濱、常好麗（2010），〈基於知識的複雜産品設計過程〉， 計算機工程，第36卷，第4期，頁283-285，北京。
173.孫皓瓊（2010），〈信息設計——讀圖時代的信息視覺化〉，藝術與設計，第8卷，第4期，頁25-26，北京。
174.徐藝乙（2011），〈手工藝的傳統——對傳統手工藝相關的知識體系的再認識〉，裝飾，第8期，頁54-59，北京。
175.張帆（2010），〈信息設計與人類生活的關係〉，數位時尚，第5卷，第3期，頁26-27，南京。
176.許子凡（2016），〈從視覺複雜度與設計表現類型探討網頁資訊圖像之注目性〉，設計學研究，第19卷，第2期，頁 1-26，中壢。
177.許子凡、楊朝明（2015），〈網頁資訊圖像的表現形式與主題內容之關聯分析〉，設計學研究，第18卷，第1期，頁1-22，中壢。
178.許喜華、陳皓（2005），〈《漢城工業設計家宣言》，解讀與設計本體論研究〉，裝飾，第1期，頁84-85，北京。
179.陶善新、唐文獻、李莉敏（2003），〈基於知識驅動的産品開發系統研究與實現〉，計算機工程與應用，第39卷，第22期，頁129-131，北京。
180.彭彥潔（2009），〈面向大衆的信息設計〉，藝術與設計，第7卷，第3期，頁21-23，北京。
181.彭輝（2014），〈以感知價值爲核心的包裝産品信息設計研究〉，包裝工程，第36卷，第14期，頁119-123，重慶。
182.曾玲暉、張翀、盧應梅、馬楠（2016），〈基于卓越教學視角的大學應用型人才培養模式研究〉，高等工程教育研究，第34卷，第1期，頁19-23，武漢。
183.曾榮梅（2008），〈“視覺化”與當代設計思維〉，設計學研究，第11卷，第2期，頁1-19，中壢。
184.曾誰我（2006），〈設計的視覺模糊：模糊程度對設計構想與詮釋之影響〉，設計學研究，第9卷，第2期，頁101-123，中壢。
185.游萬來、楊敏英、羅士孟（2014），〈台灣初任工業設計師的工作與適應情形研究〉，設計學報，第19卷，第1期，頁43-66，臺北。
186.賁東寧、李世國（2009），〈析工業設計之演進 探信息設計之未來〉，美與時代，第24卷，第7期，頁24-26，鄭州。
187.楊敏英、游萬來、郭純妤（2010），〈台灣工業設計畢業生就業情形之初探〉，設計學報，第15卷，第2期，頁73-94，臺北。
188.葉建軍，薑獻峰（2010），〈面向産品創新的氣釘槍數字化工業設計平臺〉，輕工機械，第28卷，第1期，頁77-80，杭州。
189.鄔賀銓（2014），〈大數據思維〉，科學與社會，第34卷，第1期，頁1-13，北京。
190.熊光楞（2002），〈面向並行工程的知識管理研究〉，高技術通訊，第12卷，第6期，頁38-42，北京。
191.趙斌、袁清珂（2006），〈LED産品設計製造知識管理系統的研究〉，機電工程技術，第35卷，第6期，頁13-15，廣州。
192.劉佩芳（2009），〈淺談信息設計〉，藝術與設計，第7卷，第5期，頁20-22，北京。
193.劉征、孫守遷（2009），〈面向産品外觀設計的知識管理系統〉，計算機輔助設計與圖形學學報，第21卷，第3期，頁376-381，北京。
194.劉征、孫守遷、潘雲鶴（2009），〈基於信息框架的設計師認知策略劃分及應用〉，浙江大學學報，第43卷，第5期，頁884-889，杭州。
195.劉炯宙、李基拓、陸國棟（2012），〈色彩語義驅動的産品交互式遺傳配色設計〉，計算機輔助設計與圖形學學報，第24卷，第5期，頁669-676，北京。
196.蔡文沁、彭培林、薑壽山（2004），〈航空産品設計知識的表示與重用技術研究〉，計算機集成製造系統，第10卷，第1期，頁55-58，北京。
197.鄧成連（2000），〈設計策略評述〉，設計學報，第2期，頁53-72，臺北。
198.鄭永熏（2014），〈意識型態概念對師生互動之影響：工業設計教育知識內涵之批判與建構〉，設計學研究，第17卷，第2期，頁67-95，中壢。
199.魯曉波（2001），〈信息社會設計學科發展的新方向——信息設計〉，裝飾，第25卷，第6期，頁3-7+40-43，北京。
200.魯曉波（2007），〈信息設計中的交互設計方法〉，科技導報，第28卷，第1期，頁18-21，北京。
201.蕭世文、鄭佳靈（2010），〈同步設計策略於保溫瓶設計之應用研究〉，工業設計，第38卷，第1期，頁1-6，新北。
202.薛玉香、王占仁（2016），〈地方高校應用型人才培養特色研究〉，高等工程教育研究，第34卷，第1期，頁149-153，武漢。
學位論文
1.Archer, L. B. (1968), The Structure of Design Processes. (Doctor), Royal College of Art.
2.Cunningham, P. J. (1979), The formation of the schools of design, 1830-1850, with special reference to Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds. (Doctor), University of Leeds.
3.Jewison, D. (2015), Policy and Practice : Design Education in England from 1837-1992, with Particular Reference to Furniture Courses At Birmingham, Leicester And The Royal College of Art, (Doctor), De Montfort University.
4.王敏（2013），〈産品造型設計的“ATE”三維評價研究〉，武漢理工大學博士論文。
5.王巍（2007），〈汽車造型的領域知識描述與應用〉，湖南大學博士論文。
6.朱殿華（2010），〈複雜産品多學科優化方案設計理論及方法研究〉，天津大學博士論文。
7.何曉佑（2007），〈從“中國製造”走向“中國創造”〉，南京藝術學院博士論文。
8.吳屹（2011），〈中國當代藝術設計學科實驗教學體系研究〉，中國美術學院博士論文。
9.李怡（2012），〈基於成本—質量控制的工業設計知識管理研究〉，中南大學博士論文。
10.杜淑幸（2013），〈工業設計網絡化協同系統及關鍵技術研究〉，西安電子科技大學博士論文。
11.季鵬（2016），〈德國烏爾姆設計學院的基礎課程研究〉，南京藝術學院博士論文。
12.林志遠（2009），〈藝術設計學科特徵研究〉，中國藝術研究院博士論文。
13.夏燕靖（2007），〈對我國高校藝術設計本科專業課程結構的探討〉，南京藝術學院博士論文。
14.袁翔（2015），〈生成性學習資源驅動的設計教學模式研究〉，湖南大學博士論文。
15.曹小琴（2013），〈面向“兩化融合”的工業設計專業課程體系構建研究〉，武漢理工大學博士論文。
16.陳雨（2013），〈烏爾姆設計學院的歷史價值研究〉，江南大學博士論文。
17.覃京燕（2006），〈文化遺産保護中的信息可視化設計方法研究〉，清華大學博士論文。
18.歐靜（2016），〈基於語義特徵的複雜産品工業設計系統研究〉， 湖南大學博士論文。
19.譚浩（2006），〈基於案例的産品造型設計情境知識模型構建與應用〉，湖南大學博士論文。
研討會論文
1.何人可、周旭（2007），《2007國際工業設計教育研討會論文集》，北京：中國建築工業出版社。
2.Bateman, S., Mandryk, R. L., Gutwin, C., Genest, A., McDine, D. and Brooks, C. (2010),Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
3.Harmer, K. A. (2005). Organized waste - The history of planned obsolescence from the 1930''s to the present day, Waste: The Social Context, pp. 257-260. May 11 to 14, 2005, Edmonton: Edmonton Waste Management Centre of Excellence (EWMCE)
4.Lou, Y., & Ma, J. (2015), A 3D “T-shaped” design education framework, Arts, Research, Innovation and Society (pp. 123-136), Cham: Springer.
5.Sohn, J, and Eune, J. (2003), Study on developing integrated re-education program for designers in industry, Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 6th Asian Design International Conference [CD ROM], Tsukuba, Japan.
6.Tullis, T, and Wood, L. (2004), How many users are enough for a card-sorting study, Paper presented at the Proceedings UPA.
7.Yeh, W. (2003), The demand and the evaluation of the industrial design profession from the industries, Paper presented at The 6th Asian Design Conference.
其他資料
1.Doren, H. V. (1946), Refrigerator, US Patent 2,408,460.
2.Frederick C. (1920), Household engineering : scientific management in the home, American School of Home Economics.
3.Gaffney, G. (2000), What is card sorting. Information & Design.
4.Hart, G. (2013), Effective infographics: telling stories in the technical communication context, Retrieved from https://techwhirl.com/effective-infographics-telling-stories-in-the-technical-communication-context/
5.London, B. (1932), ‘Ending the depression through planned obsolescence’, website：https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:London (1932) Ending the depression through planned obsolescence.pdf (accessed : August 15, 2016)
6.Nielsen, J. (2008), How little do users read, Retrieved from https://faculty.washington.edu/farkas/TC510-Fall2011/NielsenHowLittleDoUsersReadDF.pdf
7.Norman, D. (2010), Why design education must change. core77, 11, 26.
8.Statistics, U. S. B. o. L. (2016, Tuesday, October 24, 2017), Occupational outlook handbook, 2016-2017 edition, industrial designers, Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/arts-and-design/industrial-designers.htm
9.國發［2014］10號，2014，「國務院關於推進文化創意和設計服務與相關産業融合發展的若干意見」，http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2014-03/14/content_8713.htm，搜索時間：2014年4月30日。
10.陽光高考（2017），〈工業設計與産品設計〉，教育部高校招生陽光工程制定平臺， Retrieved from http://gaokao.chsi.com.cn/zyk/zybk/specialityDetail.action?specialityId=73384212，搜索時間：2017年6月20日。
|