:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:智慧生活科技產業跨領域核心能力與人才培育模式之研究
作者:陳俐淇
作者(外文):Chen, Li-Chi
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:教育與學習科技學系
指導教授:王子華
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:智慧生活科技產業智慧生活科技產業跨領域整合核心能力量表跨領域人才培育跨領域教育跨領域整合核心能力設計思考Smart Living Technology IndustryInterdisciplinary Core-Competencies Scale for Smart Living Technology Industryinterdisciplinary talent cultivationinterdisciplinary educationInterdisciplinary Core-CompetenciesDesign Thinking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本研究旨在探討智慧生活科技產業跨領域核心能力與人才培育模式,研究者參與教育部「智慧生活整合性人才培育計畫(第二期)─子計畫二:跨領域核心能力教學評量計畫」 (計畫主持人:王子華教授),共同建構「智慧生活科技產業跨領域整合核心能力量表」、發展訪談編碼,作為智慧生活科技產業跨領域人才培育之成效評量使用。
一、本研究建構之智慧生活科技產業之跨領域整合核心能力共包含「溝通」、「反思」、「實踐」、「科技的價值觀」和「創業家精神」五種核心能力,本研究建構之「智慧生活科技產業跨領域整合核心能力量表」,共32題,在量表信效度考驗方面,皆有良好的表現。
二、本研究發展智慧生活科技產業跨領域人才培育模式,教學方面建議參考設計思考的教學方式,評量方面是以「智慧生活科技產業跨領域能力核心能力量表」以及「教師預期與學生實際表現」評估,在質性方面則蒐集教師評分、訪談資料以及小組互動歷程資料。
三、智慧生活科技產業跨領域人才培育成效由以下可知
(一)在「智慧生活科技產業跨領域整合核心能力量表」的五個核心能力的表現
學生在溝通能力、實踐能力、科技的價值觀以及創業家精神都有進步,其中創業家精神的進步幅度最大,反思能力在量表中的變化並無明顯變化。
(二) 教師預期與學生表現
教師預期與學生表現之研究結果,實踐向度顯示教師預期與學生實際表現皆高,學生表現符合教師預期。溝通與創業家精神向度顯示教師預期低而學生實際表現高,意味著課程有其他未被教師關注到的優勢。反思和科技價值觀向度顯示教師預期高,但學生實際表現低,代表教學目標未達成。
(三)教師評分
教師在小組表現的評分是依據可行性、領導者、團隊合作、創意深度以及題目的適當性五個面向,前三名依序為第一組、第二組以及第五組,第一組和第二組在上述五個面向的表現優異、第二組在團隊合作時有衝突,第五組並無明顯的領導者。
(四)質性資料分析
學生課後立即訪談、心得報告以及追蹤訪談三種質性資料依據第三章整理的訪談架構分析歸納學生在「幸福工作坊」的學習成效,其中S1「對於學習活動進行方式的感受」與S2「自覺學習的效果」的成效良好,由於研究對象大多數沒有就業經驗,因此在S3「自覺發生的行為改變」以及S4「自覺對於產業的效果」的成效很難在訪談中問到。
(五)小組互動情形
本研究依據錄影資料及訪談資料畫出Define與Discover階段中小組互動歷程圖,由小組互動歷程圖可得知領導者領導較佳與互動情況較好的組別在跨領域教學中的表現最好(如第一組),領導者不明顯的組別、互動較少的組別表現會受影響,領導者屬於主控型,除了會影響團隊氣氛,亦會嚴重影響整組的表現。
關鍵詞:智慧生活科技產業、智慧生活科技產業跨領域整合核心能力量表、
跨領域人才培育、跨領域教育、跨領域整合核心能力、設計思考
Abstract
The author participate in the research project of Smart Living Integrated Talent Cultivation Program (Phase II) - Sub-project 2: Constructing Interdisciplinary Core Competency Assessment Model (PI: Professor Tzu-Hua Wang) funded by Ministry of Education. This study tries to construct the " Smart Living Technology Industry Interdisciplinary Integration Core-Competency Scale" and development interview code, as the effectiveness evaluation of the interdisciplinary talent cultivation of the Smart Living technology industry.
First, the interdisciplinary integration of core capabilities of the Smart Living technology industry constructed in this study consist of five core competencies: "communication", "reflection", "practice", "the values of technology" and "entrepreneurship". The "Interdisciplinary Core-Competencies Scale for Smart Living Technology Industry (IIC - SLTI Scale) " constructed in this study has a total of 32 items, and the scale has good reliability and validity.
Second, this study develops the interdisciplinary talent cultivation model of Smart Living science and technology industry. The teaching aspect is recommended to refer to the design thinking method. The qualitative aspects of the assessment are “Interdisciplinary Core-Competencies Scale for Smart Living Technology Industry” and “Teacher Expectation and Student Reality”. Performance assessment, which collects teacher ratings, interview data, and group interactions for analysis.
Third, Smart Living Technology Industry interdisciplinary talent development results are as follows
(1) The Performance of five core competencies in the " IIC - SLTI Scale "
Students have made progress in communication skills, practical ability, the values of technology, and entrepreneurial spirit. Among them, the entrepreneurial spirit has the greatest progress, and the change in reflective ability has not changed significantly in the scale.
(2) Teacher expectations and student performance
The results of the teacher's expectation and student performance, the practice dimension shows that the teacher's expectation and the student's actual performance are high, and the student's performance accord with the teacher's expectations. Communication and entrepreneurial downturns show that teachers' expectations are low and students' actual performance is high, meaning that the course has other advantages that are not of concern to teachers. Reflections and values of technology indicate that teachers' expectations are high but students' actual performance is low, and that the teaching objectives are not fulfilled.
(3) Teacher rating
The scores of teachers in the group performance are based on the feasibility, leadership, teamwork, depth of creativity and the appropriateness of the topic. The top 3 teams are in the first group, the second group and the fifth group, the first group and The second group had excellent performance in the above five dimension, the second group had conflicts in teamwork, and the fifth group had no obvious leaders.
(4) Analysis of qualitative data
The students' interviews, interview reports and follow-up interviews are based on the interview structure analysis in Chapter 3 to summarize the learning outcomes of the students in the "Happy Workshop", in which S1 "feeling the way of learning activities" and S2" The effect of conscious learning has been effective. Since most of the research subject with no carrier experience, the results of S3 "consciously changing behaviors" and S4 "consciously affecting the industry" are difficult to get answer in interviews.
(5) Group interaction
Based on the video data and interview data, this study draws the interaction diagram of the group in the Define and Discover phases. The group interaction history map shows that the leader with better leadership and better interaction has the best performance interdisciplinary teaching. (such as the first group), the group with less obvious leader and less interaction will be affected. The leader is the master type, which will affect the team atmosphere and will seriously affect the performance of the whole group (sixth group).
Keywords: Smart Living Technology Industry, Interdisciplinary Core-Competencies Scale for Smart Living Technology Industry (IIC - SLTI Scale), interdisciplinary talent cultivation, interdisciplinary education, Interdisciplinary Core-Competencies, Design Thinking
一、中文部份
Brown, T. (2010)。設計思考改造世界 (Change by Design:How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation;吳莉君譯)。台北市:聯經出版社。 (原作出版於2009年)
Martin, R. (2011). 設計思考就是這麼回事! (李仰淳、林麗冠譯)。台北市:遠見天下文化. (Original work published 2009)
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2011)。教育大未來:我們需要的關鍵能力(21st century skills: learning for life in our times;劉曉樺譯)。臺北市:如果出版社。(原作出版於2009年)
大專院校課程資訊網(2018)。查詢日期:2018年1月20日,檢自http://ucourse-tvc.yuntech.edu.tw/WebU/index.aspx。
王秀槐(2011)。學習成果導向的課程設計與評量:理念與實例。教育研究月刊,207,53-59。
王子華(2015)。教育部補助智慧生活整合性人才培育計畫(II)子計畫二跨領域核心能力教學評量計畫年度結案成果報告(104L135)。臺北市:教育部。
王子華(2018)。教育部補助智慧生活整合性人才培育計畫(II)子計畫二跨領域核心能力教學評量計畫年度結案成果報告(106J0911UC)。臺北市:教育部。
王保進(2011)。以學生學習成效品質保證為核心之第二週期系所評鑑作業規範。評鑑雙月刊,33,7-11。
王昕紅(2008)。美國工程與技術教育認證的新進展。高等學校理工科教學指導委員會通訊,6。http://jiaoyu.eol.cn/cooperate/crct/jun08/jxyj/200806/t20080603_300515.shtml
王英儒(2017)。以設計思考推動進行校園形象設計創作研究:以內湖高工為例。
未出版之碩士論文,臺灣師範大學設計學研究所,台北市。
王政彥(1990)。以CIPP評鑑當前的教育視導。教育研究,15,45-51。
行政院(2016)。數位國家‧創新經濟發展方案。查詢日期:2016年1月20日,檢自https://www.bost.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=05CD247F9B265CBC。
行政院主計處(2014)。人力資源調查統計年報。查詢日期:2017年1月20日,檢自https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=40928&ctNode=3102
李開復(2006)。做21世紀的人才。臺北市:聯經。
李嘉華(2009)。連結企業資源提升創業教育效益淺談日本創業教育之現況。臺灣經濟研究月刊,32(8),103-107。
李嘉華(2012)。從「歐洲智慧城市」計畫談我國智慧城市之發展方向-以台北市為例。臺灣經濟研究月刊,35(2),109-115。
李坤崇(2011)。大學課程發展與學習成效評量。臺北市:高等教育。
宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4), 97-130 。
吳心楷、宋曜廷、簡馨瑩(2010)。錄影分析在教育研究應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),1-37。
周素卿、劉佩玲(2012)。智慧生活家科技。臺灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心:臺北市。
林宜玄、蕭芳玲(2004),訓練評鑑模式之比較分析。商業職業教育季刊,93,11-20。
林秉毅(2008)。高齡學習方案規劃人員培訓成效評估之研究。未出版之碩士論文,
國立中正大學成人及繼續教育所,嘉義市。
林穎謙、唐玄輝(2009)。情境故事法對於跨領域合作設計課程之影響。工業設計雜誌,121,204-210。
林毓凱、方盈禎、林思萱、洪毓祥(2013)。智慧城市導入參考手冊。臺北市:資策會。
林舜晨(2013)。設計思考的應用—以探討高中生參與工作坊的經驗知覺為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學管理研究所 ,臺北市。
范斯淳、楊錦心(2012)。2012各國技職教育。教育資料集刊,55,71-102。 
侯冠瑜(2014)。以營運模式引導跨領域設計人才進行產品概念創新之研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所,雲林縣。
施雪初(2014)。服飾製作專業人才教育訓練評估之研究。康大學報,4,43-67。
唐玄輝、林穎謙(2011)。情境故事法運用於跨領域合作的問題與影響。設計學報,16(3),21-44。
連勇智、方至民、鍾招正(2009)。創業研究與家族企業:回顧與展望。組織與管理,2(2),51-76。
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。查詢日期:2016年1月20日,檢自http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/5/pta_2189_2524507_39227.pdf
袁大鈺、唐牧群(2010)。跨領域學術社群之智識網絡結構初探:以臺灣科技與社會研究為例。圖書資訊學刊,8(2),125-163。
財團法人資訊工業策進會 (Ed.). (2012)。智慧臺灣,臺北:行政院科技顧問組。
郭重吉(2008)。介紹跨領域的研究與教育。研究與創新,7,5-6。
教育部(2013)。教育部人才培育白皮書。查詢日期:2017年1月20日,檢自http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/5/pta_2189_2524507_39227.pdf
教育部(2017)。技術及職業教育政策綱領。查詢日期:2017年3月20日,檢自https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2300/News.aspx?n=3E8E4F90CE38C77B&sms=0458C794DB622AAE
陳玉蘭(2003)。論協同教學的實施與師資培育因應之道。教育科學期刊,3(1),57-78。
陳清溪(2014)。我國人才培育政策之探討。教育資料與研究,112,1-24。
陳俐淇、王子華、邱富源、沈欣宜、曾敏(2017)。「跨領域整合核心能力量表」的編製—以母嬰生活服務為例。科學教育學刊,25(2),143-168。
陳俐彤(2017)。設計思考的創新擴散研究-以大中華地區為例。未出版之碩士論文,清華大學科技管理研究所。
陳雅慧(2015)。「多元智能之父」加德納:未來人才,必備4大關鍵能力。親子天下雜誌,66,158-160。
陳瑜芬、賴銘娟(2007)。台灣創業課程現況之探究。創業管理研究,2(3),117-147。
陳明璋(1989)。創業的智慧。宏碁科技管理教育中心出版。
黃瑽寧(2017)。從STEM教育,進化為STEAM教育。親子天下。
黃子瓔(2010)。從3R到4C:淺談21世紀能力的發展與趨勢。數位典藏與學習電子報,9(11)。
許維蓉(2007)。大學工科教師對成果導向認證制度之態度研究。未出版之碩士論文,中央大學學習與教學研究所,桃園縣。
許芷維(2008)。第二屆歐洲品質保證論壇探討品質保證策略與實務。評鑑雙月刊, 12,60-61。
張火燦(1998)。策略性人力資源管理。台北市:揚智。
張岑瑤、林妙真(2013)。設計風格旅店試驗場:行動研究應用於整合型創意教學設計。文化創意產業研究學報,3(2),49-56。
湯堯、徐慧芝、蘇建洲(2016)。大學校院理工科系跨領域課程品質評估量表發展之研究。。教育科學研究期刊,61(1),91-113。
曾淑惠(2008)。教育評鑑:理論與實務的對話。臺北市:師大書苑。
曾淑惠(2004)。教育評鑑模式。臺北市:心理。
童羽薇(2015)。探討設計思考如何應⽤用於創新醫療照護服務—以遠距照護服務創新為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺灣大學商學研究所。
鄧鈞文、李靜儀、劉曉芬、陳怡如、鈕方頤( 2016)。學用合一: Knowledge-action Integration。台北市:高等教育出版。
楊維珍、林佳駿(2015)。以RD System整合運作跨領域團隊之成效─以同科系團隊培訓背景差異對競賽學習成效之影響為例。管理資訊計算,4(1),285-293。
楊雅筑(2014)。TED x Taipei許毓仁:不創業也要有創業家精神。查詢日期:2017年5月20日,檢自https://www.inside.com.tw/2014/08/27/mymkc-entrepreneurship
蔡孟利(2014)。如何引導跨領域合作能力的學習。科學月刊,529,4-5。
蔡錫濤(2000)。九年一貫課程重要概念釋疑。新講台教育雜誌,1,48-51。

蔡敦浩、林韶怡(2013)。創業教育的教學模式:典範差異與現況反思。創業管理研究,8(2),1-18。
蔡威德(2014)。設計思考導入地方體驗設計–以坪林為例。未出版之碩士論文,臺北科技大學創新設計研究所,台北市。
鄭泰昇(2002)。資訊建築-實質與虛擬的整合設計。建築師雜誌,331。
鄭育萍(2016)。大學教育再想像:史丹佛2025之創新大學學習生態系統。教育研究月刊,266,96-112。
謝如梅(2009)。創業教育在國際上的發展現況與未來展望。創業管理研究,
2(3),109-146。
顏佩如、溫羚勻(2016)。業師協同教學之教學策略與學習成效之研究。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,8,3-40。
羅希哲、蔡慧音、曾國鴻(2011)。高中女生STEM網路專題式合作學習之研究。高雄師大學報,30,41-61。
蘇明宏(2006)。壽險業務員人口因素與其教育訓練滿意度及工作效能關係之研究-以C保險公司為例。未出版之碩士論文,淡江大學保險研究所,新北市。
蘇錦麗(2009)。大學校院學生學習成果評估相關內涵分析。評鑑雙月刊,21,58-62 。
郁義鴻、李志能(2002)。創業管理。臺北市 : 五南。

二、英文部份
Abad-Grau, M. M., & Arias-Aranda, D. (2006). Operations strategy and flexibility: modeling with Bayesian classifiers. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(4), 460-484.
ACTS(2014). Assessment & Teaching of 21th century skill. Retrieved from http://atc21s.org/index.php
Adamson, L; Becerro, M. ; Cullen , P.; Gonzalez-Vega, L. ; Sobrino, J. J. & Ryan, N. (2010). Quality Assurance and Learning Outcomes. ENQA Workshop Report 17.
Ahmad, N., Ramayah, T., Wilson, C., & Liz, K. (2010). Is entrepreneurial competency and business success relationship contingent upon business environment?A study of Malaysian SMEs, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16(3), 182-203
Alliger, G., & Janak, E.(1989). Kirkpatrick’s Level of Training Criteria: Thirty Years Later. Personnel Psychology, 42(2), 331-343.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). Virtual classroom characteristics and student satisfaction with internet-based MBA courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32-54.
Babson College ( 2013a). Teaching Entrepreneurial Thought and Action: An Educator Program for Greater China, In Babson College (Ed.), Babson Park, MA.
Baird, I. S., & Thomas, H. (1985). Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking. Academy of Management Review, 10, 230-243.
Barr, H .,Koppel, I. ,Reeves, S.,Hammick, M.,& Freeth, D. (2005). Effective interprofessional education: Argument, assumption and evidence. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Learning for Mastery. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. Eds. B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings and G. F. Madaus. New York: McGraw, 47-63.
Brandt, R. (1993). On Outcome-Based Education: A Conversation with Bill Spady. Educational Leadership, 50, 66-70.
Brinckmann, J. (2007). Competence of top management teams and success of new technology based firms: a theoretical and empirical analysis concerning competencies of entrepreneurial teams and the development of their ventures.Wiesbaden: DUV.
Brinkerhoff, R. O. (1987). Achieving results from training: How to evaluate human resource development to strengthen programs and increase impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Brown, T. (2008). Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84-92.
Brown, T. (2009). Designers - think big! Retrieved from http://
www.ted.com/talks/tim_brown_urges_designers_to_think_big
British Design Council. (2005). Eleven lessons: A study of the design process. Retrieved from http:// www.designcouncil.org.uk.
Burrow, J. & Berardinelli, P (2003). Systematic performance improvement- refining the space between learning and result. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(1), 6-13.
Carree, M., & Thurik, A. R.(2010). The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth 557-594.
Capper, C. A., & Jamison, M. T. (1993).Outcomes-Based Education Reexamined: From Structural Functionalism to Poststructuralism. Educational Policy, 7(4), 427-46.
Co, M., & Mitchell, B. (2006). Entrepreneurship education in South Africa: a nation wide survey. Education &Training, 48 (5), 348-59.
Commission of the European Communities (2005). i2010 - A European Information Society for growth and employment. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/nn/Downloads/i2010%20-%20A%20European%20Information%20Society%20for%20growth%20and%20employment%202005_229.pdf
Cone, J. (2011). Teaching entrepreneurship in colleges and universities: how (and why) a new academic field is being built. Retrieved from http://www.kauffman.org/entrepreneurship/Teaching entrepreneurship-in-colleges.aspx.
Covin, J. G. and Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 47-63.
Covin, J.G., and Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
Council of Arts Accrediting Associations. (2009).Disciplines in combination: Interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and other collaborative programs of study. Reston, VA: Author.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Model. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Design Council (2018). The Design Process: What is the Double Diamond? Retrieved from
http://www. designcouncil. org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond
Dollinger, M. J.(2003). Entrepreneurship: Strategies and Resources (3th ed.), NJ : Prentice Hall.
Drucker, P. F.(1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. NY : Harper and Row.
Eaton, J. S. (2003). Is Accreditation Accountable? The Continuing Conversation between Accreditation and the Federal Government.CHEA Monograph Series, 1. Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., & Pearson, D. (2000). The impact of entrepreneurship training programs on an individual’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from www.babson.edu/entrep/fer
European Commission. (2008). Lifelong Learning for Creativity and Innovation. A Background Paper. Slovenian EU Council Presidency. Retrieved from http://www.sac.smm.lt/images/12 Vertimas SAC Creativity and innovation - SI Presidency paper anglu k.pdf
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 5, 157-188.
Gagne, R. M. (1974). Essentials of Learning for Instruction. Hinsdale: The Dryden Press.
Glaser, R. (1963).Instructional Technology and the Measurement of Learning Outcomes: Some Questions. American Psychologist, 18(8), 519-21.
Galvin, J. C. (1983).What trainers can learn from educators about evaluating management training. Training and Development Journal, 37 (8), 52-57.
Galloway, L., Anderson, M., Brown, W., & Wilson, L. (2005). Enterprise skills for the economy. Education & Training, 47(1), 7-17.
Ghosh, B. C., & Tan, W. L. (2001). The Key Success Factors, Distinctive Capabilities and Strategic Thrusts of top SMEs in Singapore. Journal of Business Research, 10(51), 209-221.
Greene, P. G., Katz, J. A.,& Johannisson, B.(2004).Introduction to special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(3), 238-241.
Gronlund, N. E.(1970). Stating Behavioral Objectives for Classroom Instruction. New York: Macmillan.
Growth. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.). Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, 5, Hamdi, M.(2007). Outcome-Based Education. Retrieved from http://celt.ust.hklobe/
downloadNPAAO_OBEbriefing/070313_SENGI%20-%20ABET%20Criteria.pdf.
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Halinen, I. & Jarvinen, R. (2008). Towards inclusive education: the case of Finland. Prospects, 38, 77-97.
Harden, R. M.(1999). AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-Based Education: Part 1-An Introduction to Outcome-Based Education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7-14.
Harris, M. L., & S.G. Gibson. (2008). Examining the entrepreneurial attitudes of US business students. Education Training ,50 (7), 568-81.
Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005a). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education & Training, 47(2), 98-111. 
Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005b). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part II. Education & Training, 47(3), 158-69.
Hornaday, J. A. (1982), Research about living entrepreneurs, in Calvin A. Kent, Donald L. Sexton, and Karl H. Vesper (eds), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Englewood C.
Hytti, U., & O’Gorman, C. (2004). What is Enterprise education? An analysis of the objectives and methods of enterprise education programmes in four European countries. Education & Training, 46(1), 11-23.
Huber, A. and Mayer, I. (2013). Smart Cities: An Emerging City Concept to
Frame Sustainable Transitions. European Institute for Energy Research.
IBM (2009). New York 2009. Retrieved from http://ibm.co/Ja1v83.
IDEO. (2012). The Design Thinking for Educators Toolkit. Retrieved from https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/
IDEO.(2015). The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. Retrieved from http://bestgraz.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Field-Guide-to-Human-Centered-Design_IDEOorg.pdf
Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2011). Core competencies for interprofessional
collaborative practice: Report of an expert panel, 2011. Retrieved from http:// www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/ipecreport.pdf
International Telecommunication Union [ITU] (2005). ITU Internet Report: The Internet of Things. Geneva: ITU. Retrieved from
https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/tunis/newsroom/stats/The-Internet-of-Things-2005.pdf
Jacobs, J. A., & Frickel. (2009). Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43-65.
Johnson, M. (1967). Definitions and Models in Curriculum Theory. Educational Theory, 17(2), 127-40.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-80.
Katz, J. A. (2003). The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876-1999. Journal of Business venturing, 18(2), 283-300.
Katz, J. A. (2007). Education and training in entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M.
Kelley, D. (2002). Human-centered design. Retrieved from TED Talks:
https://www.ted.com/talks/david_kelley_on_human_centered_design#t-1004674
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great ideas revisited-revisiting Kirkpatrick’s four-level Model. Training & development, 50(1), 54-59.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1987). Evaluation training and development handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.  
Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs :The Four Levels. San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Koehler.
Kirkpatrick, W. (2012). The new world kirkpatrick model. Retrieved from http://www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/OurPhilosophy/the new
WorldKirkpatrickModel/tabid/303/Default.aspx
Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H.C. and Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation . Decision Support Systems, 43, 111-126
Knight, D. B., Lattuca, L. R., Kimball, E. W., & Reason, R. D. (2013).Understanding interdisciplinarity: Curricular and organizational features of undergraduate interdisciplinary programs. Innovative Higher Education, 38(2), 143-158.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
Kuratko, D. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (5),577-598.
Kundu, S.C. , & Rani,S.(2007).Personality and attitudes of Indian young female workforce: Entrepreneurial orientation by education and regions. Managing Global Transitions, 5(3), 229-252.
Leibenstein, H. (1983). Competition and Z-efficiency: Reply. Journal of Political Economy, 81.
Lou, S. J., Liu, Y. H., Shih, R. C., &; Tseng, K. H. (2011). The senior high school students’ learning behavioral model of STEM in PBL. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21 (2), 161-183.
Luecht, R. M., Madsen, M. K., Taugher, M. P., & Petterson, B. J. (1990). Assessing professional perceptions: Design and validation of an interdisciplinary education perception scale. Journal of Allied Health, 19(2), 181-191.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Man, T. W. Y., & Lau, T. (2005). The context of entrepreneurship in Hong Kong: An investigation through the patterns of entrepreneurial competencies in contrasting industrial environments. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 464-481.
McNeir, G. (1993). Outcomes-Based Education: Tool for Restructuring. OSSC Bulletin, 36(8), 1-30.
McFadyen, A. K., Maclaren, W. M., & Webster, V. S. (2007). The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): An alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 21(4), 433-443. 
Manpower Group(2013). Manpower Group Talent Shortage Survey 2013. Retrieved from https://www.manpowergroup.com/wps/wcm/connect/6c099de4-398f-4546-bac4-2d2708362f16/talent-shortage-13-infographic.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=6c099de4-398f-4546-bac4-2d2708362f16
Miller, D.,(1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms.Management Science, 29, 770-791.
Morcke, A. M., Dornan, T., & Eika, B. (2013). Outcome (competency) Based Education: An Exploration of Its Origins, Theoretical basis, and Empirical Evidence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18 (4), 851-863.
Mitchelmore, S., & Rowley, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: a literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16(2), 92-111.
Montuori, A. (2008). Foreword transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity: Theory and practice (pp. 9-17). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Muzychenko, O., & Saee, J. (2004). Cross cultural professional competence in higher education. Journal of Management Systems, 16 (4), 1-19.
Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education & Training, 52(1), 20-47.
Nam, T. and Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City With Dimensions of Technology,People, and Institutions. 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, NY.
New Media Consortium.(2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf.
Oldham, G.R., & Cummings, A. (1996).Employee creativity: Personal and
contextual factors at work. Academy of management Journal, 39(3), 607-634.
Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and Communication Technology and Local Governance: Understanding the Difference between Cities in Developed and Emerging Economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27(6), pp. 585-607.
Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. N. (2001). Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers. New York: Longman.
Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 22, 215-225.
Rachman-Moore, D., & Kenett, R. S. (2006). The use of simulation to improve the effectiveness of training in performance management. Journal of Management Education, 30 (3), 455-77.
Rivera, R. J., & Paradise, A. (2006). State of the industry in leading enterprises: ASTD’s annual review of trends in workplace learning and performance. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Training and Development.
Robert, A. B., & Rebecca A. H. (2010). How Entrepreneurs Acquire The Capacity to Excel: Insights From Research on Expert Performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 49-65.
Rulke, D. L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2000). Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Science, 46(5), 612-25.
Schuler, R. S. (1986). Fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship in organizations: implications for organization structure and HRM practices. Human Resource Management, 25(4), 607-629.
Schumpeter, J. A.(1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Schmitt-Rodermund, E.(2004).Pathways to Successful Entrepreneurship: Parenting, Personality, Early Entrepreneurial Competence, and Interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 498-518.
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2000).Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave. Academy of management Journal, 43(2), 215-223.
Shook, C. L., & Bratianu, C. (2008). Entrepreneurial intent in a transitional economy: an application of the theory of planned behaviour to Romanian students. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1).
Siemens. (2004). Pictures of the Future: The Magazine for Research and Innovation. Munich, Germany: Siemens AG Corporate Communications and Corporate Technology.
Simon, M., Houghton, S., & Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: how individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-34.
Smart Cities and Communities (2013). Key Messages for the High-Level Group from the Smart Cities Stakeholder Platform Roadmap Group. Retrieved from http://eusmartcities.eu/sites/all/files/ Final%20key%20messages%20to%20HLG%20from%20Sta keholder%
20Platform_FINAL.pdf
Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-91.
Spady, W. G. (1977). Competency Based Education: A Bandwagon in Search of a Definition. Educational Researcher 6(1), 9-14.
Spady, W. D. & Marshall, K. G. (1991). Beyond traditional outcomes-based education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67-72.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcomes Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Spady, W. G. (1981). Outcome-based instructional management: A sociological perspective. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W. P., Schmitz, J. G., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. E. (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
Stanford d.school. (2010). The Bootcamp Bootleg. Retrieved from Stanford d.school: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Stevenson, H. H., & Gumpert, D. E.(1985).The heart of entrepreneurship. Harvard Business, 63(2), 85-94.
Stevenson, H. H.,& Jarillo, J. C. (1991). A new entrepreneurial paradigm. In A. Etzioni & P. Lawrence (Eds.), Socio-economics: Toward a new synthesis .Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Stevenson, H. H. (1983). A perspective on entrepreneurship. Harvard Business School Working Paper 9-384-131.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stopford, J. M. and Baden-Fuller, C. W. F.,(1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship.
Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 521-536.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoint on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
The University of Hong Kong (2011). OBASL & the relationship with learning outcomes, learning activities and assessment. Retrieved from http://ar.cetl.hku.hk/obasl.htm
Timmons, J. A., & Spinelli, S. (2004). New venture creation, 6th ed., Boston: McGraw Hill Inc.
Thompson, A. A., & Stappenbeck, G. J. (1997). The Business Strategy Game, Chicago: Irwin.
Tompson, G. H., & Dass, P. (2000). Improving students’ self-efficacy: The relative impact of case and simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31, 22-41.
Tyler, R. W. (2010). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
University of Virginia. (n.d.). Values & Core Competencies. Retrieved from https://ipe.virginia.edu/about/valuescorecompetencies/
United States Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (2010). Building Blocks for Competency Models. Retrieved from: http://www.careeronestop.org/CompetencyModel/Pyramid.aspx
Vande Zande, R. (2007). Design Education as Community Outreach and Interdisciplinary Study. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 3(1). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4f37f63k
Walsh, C. L., Gordon, M. F., Marshall, M., Wilson, F., & Hunt, T. (2005). Interprofessional capability: A developing framework for interprofessional education. Nurse Education in Practice, 5(4), 230-237.
Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. & Nelson, L. E.(2010). Helping CIOs Understand “Smart City” Initiatives. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research Inc. Press.
Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2005). Experience and cognition: do novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? International Small Business Journal, 23(1), 72-98
Werner, J. M. & DeSimone, R. L. (2006). Human resource development (4th ed .).Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.
Werner, J.M., & DeSimone, R. L. (2009). Human resource development (5th ed.).Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Wilhelmsson, M., Pelling, S., Uhlin, L., Dahlgren, L. O., Faresjö, T., & Forslund, K. (2012). How to think about interprofessional competence: A metacognitive model. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(2), 85-91.
Wolf, R. A. (2009). Future directions for American higher education accreditation. In T. W. Bigalke & D/ E. Neubauer (Eds.), Public good and quality in higher education in Asia Pacific. New York: Palgrave, MacMillan Press.
Wood, V., Flavell, A., Vanstolk, D., Brainbridge, L., & Nasmith, L. (2009). The road to collaboration: Developing an interprofessional competency framework. Journal of Interprofessionaln Care, 23(6), 621-629.
Yin , R. K.(2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zahra, S. A. (1993). New product innovation in established companies: associations with industry and strategy variables. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 47-69.
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. Martocchio (Ed.). Research in personnel and human resource management. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE