:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:藝術創作轉化為空間意境設計模式之研究
作者:高婭娟
作者(外文):GAO, YAJUAN
校院名稱:國立臺灣藝術大學
系所名稱:創意產業設計研究所
指導教授:林榮泰
林伯賢
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2018
主題關鍵詞:藝術創作詩情畫意室內設計認知傳播設計模式Artistic creationIdyllic stelyInterior designCognition and communicationDesign model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
文化創意產業視角下,文化藝術和創意設計逐漸滲透生活和產業,跨界整合藝術創作與室內設計,促進創作者、設計師與使用者(觀眾/業主/消費者)三者有效互通,建構藝術創作轉化為室內空間的設計模式與發展創新產業,是值得深入探討之議題。
文章圍繞藝術創作到室內空間的轉化設計,以「詩情畫意」系列繪畫作品為研究對象,分三個階段性研究逐步展開。研究一為詩情畫意繪畫的認知與傳播研究,以認知與傳播理論為評量依據,瞭解海峽兩岸地區觀眾對「詩情畫意」畫作的感知程度與差異,並歸納專家對畫作審美認知的評述,作為畫作轉化設計的要點與基礎。研究二為詩情畫意畫作轉化為室內設計的個案研究,以「天光雲影共徘徊」、「天上浮雲似白衣」與「朝辭白帝彩雲間」三幅畫作轉化室內設計為案例,以設計師後設認知解題策略、創作者和觀眾認知和文化外中內三層次來詮釋「詩情」與「畫意」,按四大步驟轉化完成室內設計方案,將藝術意境融入生活空間設計,並建構設計模式。研究三為「詩情畫意」轉化室內設計作品的評估研究,檢核消費者對藝術創作轉化設計的認同程度、喜好及整體滿意度。結果表明消費者對轉化設計作品整體呈現較好的認同感和滿意度,且三個轉化層次和多項要素之間呈現顯著正相關,不同居住面積與預算花費的消費者的認同感和滿意度沒有差異,但不同教育學歷與不同專業背景的消費者具有顯著差異。在設計模式運用和執行上,色彩與圖案轉化、詩情畫意的風格營造和室內效果圖應重點被設計師注意並加強,同時也不容忽視為消費者提供客製化的轉化設計服務,最終營造打動消費者內心的空間意境氛圍,有利於提升消費者對設計方案的喜好與滿意度。最後基於轉化設計模式發展服務設計及服務藍圖,建構創意產業概念及商業模式,根據使用情境和使用者需求做出正確的設計服務,為居住空間營造文化意境,體現其生活精神。
本研究以藝術作品作為文化輸出的一種形式,驅動室內空間設計模式創新,賦予空間新的文化感受和意境內涵,期望為傳統行業增添藝術文化之創新元素,及提高設計產業服務內容與品質,提升全民文化創意美學素養與美化生活居住空間環境。
From the perspective of cultural and creative industries, artistic creation and creative design of related cultures are gradually infiltrated into life and industry. A cross-border integration of art creation and interior design can promote the effective interoperability among creators, designers, and users (audiences/owners/consumers). In order to construct the design pattern that transforms artistic creation into interior space, and develop innovative industries. These are issue worthy of in-depth discussion.
The article focuses on the transformation of artistic creation into interior space. Its research object is the series of “idyllic” paintings, which is gradually developed in three phases. Study 1 is the study of cognition and communication of “idyllic” paintings. Based on the theory of cognition and communication, the audience is aware of the degree of perception and difference in “idyllic” paintings on the both sides across the Taiwan Straits and sum up the experts' comments on the aesthetic perception of the painting, which is a key point and basis for paintings to transform into designs. Study 2 is the case study of transforming poetic and pictorial paintings into interior design. In connection with Study 1, the three interior paintings of “Reflected sunlight and cloud shadow lingered over and over”, “The clouds in the sky look just like white gowns” and “I set out with a farewell to Bai-Di Town glittered with morning cloud” are used as examples. The designer’s metacognitive problem-solving strategies, creators and audiences’ cognition and culture are used to interpret the “poetic sentiment” and the “pictorial intention” in three levels: external, central and internal. Four steps are taken to complete the interior design program, the artistic conception is integrated into the design of the living space and also the design model is constructed. Study 3 is the assessment of a transformation of “idyllic” works into interior design. It examines the degree of consumers’ recognition, preference, and overall satisfaction of the artistic creative transformation design. The result shows that consumers have a good recognition and satisfaction with the perceptual assessment on the implementation of the transformation interior design of artwork, and there is a significant positive correlation between the three transformation levels and multiple factors. There is no significant difference in the satisfaction and the sense of agreement of consumers in different house size and decoration budget. But the consumers’ different education and professional backgrounds make significant differences in their preferences for turning painting to interior design. In the application and execution of design model, the color and pattern transformation, idyllic stely creation, and interior renderings are worthy of the designer’s attention. At the same time, it is also impossible to ignore the conversion design for consumer customization. An ultimate creation of a moving atmosphere for the consumer’s inner space is conducive to the improvement of consumers’ preferences and satisfaction with design projects. Finally, it will develop service design and service blueprints based on the transformation design pattern and construct the concept of creative industry and business model. The situation of usage and the consumers’ needs to provide correct design services and create a cultural atmosphere for the living space reflect his life spirit.
This research uses artistic creation works as a form of cultural output to motivate innovations in the design of interior spaces, giving a new cultural feeling and artistic connotation to the space. This article will also add artistic and cultural innovation elements to traditional industries, enrich the content and quality of design industry services and enhance the quality of people’s cultural creative aesthetics and living environment.
一、中文部分
王受之(1995)。世界現代設計史。北京:新世界出版社。
王築筠(2003)。創作過程能否被界定?美育,135,78-79。
文化建設委員會(2010)。文化創意產業發展法。臺北:文化建設委員會。
白露露(2010)。室內裝潢設計方法與步驟。才智,14,22-22。
任文永、陳實(譯)(2013)。設計師式認知(原作者:Nigel Cross)。武漢:華中科技大學出版社。
李幼蒸(譯)(1994)。純粹現象學通論(原作者: Husserl, E)。臺北:桂冠。
李偉(2001)。從藝術與設計的關係看現代藝術設計教育改革。湖南商學院學報,8(6),132-134。
李婉婉(1996)。室內環境設計。臺北:東大圖書。
宋同正(2014)。序–服務設計的本質內涵和流程工具。設計學報,19(2),1-8。
林永發(2007)。自然與藝境——林永發水墨畫創作理念與作品解析。臺北:蕙風堂。
林俊宏(2006)。以顧客價值層及模式為基礎構建顧客價值管理架構——以國道客運業為例(未出版博士論文)。新竹市:國立交通大學。
林崇宏(2001)。設計倫理與價值:設計文化與新思維的探索。臺北:田園城市文化。
林榮泰(2005)。文化創意,設計加值。藝術欣賞,1(7),26-32。
林榮泰(2007a)。蒙家就是我家——從蒙得裏安談文化創意的簡約設計。藝術欣賞,3(5),4-9。
林榮泰(2007b)。來自原住民連杯的文化創意產品。藝術欣賞,3(2),21-28。
林榮泰(2009)。文化創意產品設計: 從感性科技,人性設計與文化創意談起。人文與社會科學簡訊,11(1),32-43。
林榮泰(2011)。從服務創新思維探討感質體驗設計。設計學研究,14(S),13-31。
林榮泰、李仙美(2015)。詩情畫意——仙雲之美習作經驗分享。新北:宇晨。
林榮泰、宋毓仁(2002)。全方位設計的人因評估模式。中華民國人因工程學會2002年會暨研討會論文集 (247-252頁)。新竹:國立清華大學。
林榮泰、劉邦初、李英傑、蘇錦夥、張淑華 (2010)。創意生活產業的感性場域與感質商品-The One 南園之個案研究。臺灣感性學會研討會論文,東海大學,臺中。
於浩(2009)。傳統室內空間的意境表達。藝術探索,23(5),105-106。
袁國強(2014)。基於室內設計要素總結。科學與財富,2,5-6。
徐啟賢(2004)。以臺灣原住民文化為例探討文化產品設計的轉換運用(未出版之碩士論文)。長庚大學工業設計研究所,桃園縣。
徐啟賢、林榮泰(2011)。文化產品設計程式。設計學報,16(4),1-18。
高婭娟、顏惠芸、林榮泰(2017)。藝術作品轉換到室內設計模式之研究:以 [詩情畫意] 系列畫作為例。藝術學報, (101),107-134。
孫琦(2014)。現代藝術語境中的室內設計研究(未出版博士論文)。南京林業大學,南京市。
陳秀娟 & Mihaly,C(1998)。生命的心流。臺北:天下文化。
陳勁甫、陳威亞(2005)大學生遊學產品意象、知覺價值、滿意度及購後行為意圖關係之研究。戶外遊憩研究,18(1),23-46。
陳朝平(2000)。藝術槪論。臺北:五南圖書。
陳靜晃(2002)。心理學概論。臺北:揚智。
陳璽敬、陳俊良、林志隆 (2014)。策展理念傳達效果探討——以 [原來臺灣] 展覽為例。設計學報, 19(3),1-22。
陳璽敬、顏惠芸、李仙美、林志隆(2016)。策展設計之個案研究-以 [詩情畫意——仙雲之美油畫習作展] 為例。設計學報,21(4),1-24。
陳韻如、林珮淳(2008)。從科技藝術探討當代跨領域創作之發展。發表於國立臺灣藝術大學主辦之 [SIGGRAPH TAIPEI 2008 國際學術研討會論文類發表]。臺北: 臺灣藝術大學。
陳繼勝(2005)。創作性藝術活動在精神科職能治療之應用。臺灣職能治療研究與實務——臨床筆記,1,54-63。
曹晉(2017)。室內空間藝術的情境與意境。美術大觀,2017 (6),118-11。
張似贊(譯)(2006)。建築空間論 :如何品評建築(原作者:Bruno Zevi)北京 :中國建築工業出版社。(原著出版年:1984)
張昇鵬(1995)。資賦優異學生創造思考能力與後設認知能力相關之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,1995(13),221-240。
彭琛、馬春明、周松竹、薛睿韜(2010)。大學藝術鑒賞。北京:中國民族攝影藝術。
葉茉俐(2014)。詩詞文化的創意設計應用(未出版博士論文)。臺灣藝術大學,新北市。
葉茉俐、林伯賢、徐啟賢(2011)。詩詞形神轉化的文化創意設計應用。設計學報, 16(4),91-106。
曾倫崇、章玉如(2012)。顧客知覺品質,體驗價值,滿意度與忠誠度關係之研究—以高雄,臺南地區飯店為例。嘉南學報(人文類),38,347-365。
資訊工業策進會(2008)。服務體驗工程方法指引-研究篇。臺北:經濟部技術處。
趙力忠、劉源(2007)。葉淺予文集。北京:中國文聯。
趙字南(2008)。淺談室內空間的意境營造。藝術理論,2008 (7),160-161。
趙雅博(1974)。藝術創作的心理因素。雄獅美術,46,84-86。
蔡麗芬(2009)。基於工作過程的專案教學法在室內裝飾設計課程中的應用。全國商情:經濟理論研究,21,96-98。
鄭力嘉(2008)。藝術創作活動的休閒效益之研究。國立臺東大學:臺東。
鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。臺北:桂冠圖書。
鄭麗玉(2006)。認知心理學:理論與應用。臺北:五南圖書。
漢寶德(2012)。設計型思考。臺北:聯經。
鄧宗聖(2012)。論藝術本位的文化創意教育。教育資料與研究,105,67-90。
劉暢、胡昌格(2016)。淺談繪畫到設計的延伸與轉化。藝術科技,2016 (5),149-150。
劉銳(2010)。因心造境,以手運心——室內空間園林意境設計研究。吉林藝術學院學報,(4),33-37。
謝玫晃、管倖生(2011)。形態聯想組合法應用於藝術商品設計。設計學報,16(4),57-73。
簡紅珠(1992)。教學研究的主要派典及其啟示之探析。高雄:復文。
蘇文清、嚴貞、李傳房(2007)。符號學與認知心理學基礎理論於視覺設計之運用研究-以「標誌設計」為例。人文暨社會科學期刊,3(1),95-104。
二、英文部分
Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: towns, Buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
Banham, R. (1967). Theory and design in the first machine age. New York and Washington: Praeger Publishers.
Cardozo, R.(1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research , 2(8), 244-249.
Coles, A. (2005). On art’s romance with design. Design Issues, 21(3), 17-24.
Cooper, R., & Press, M. (1995). The design agenda: a guide to successful design management. John Wiley and Sons.
Council, D. (2017). Eleven lessons: managing design in eleven global brands. A Study of the Design Process 2005.
Deming, (1981). Management of statistical techniques for quality and productivity. New York University.
Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: a philosophy of design. London: Reaktion.
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The american customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. the Journal of Marketing, 7-18.
Gao, Y. J., Lin, Y., Chen, L. Y., & Dai, D. C. H. (2016, July). From “Idyllic” to “Living Space”—Turning “Art Work” into “Interior Design”. In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 345-354). Springer, Cham.
Gao, Y. J., Chen, L. Y., Lee, S., Lin, R., & Jin, Y. (2017, July). A study of communication in turning “poetry” into “painting”. In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 37-48). Springer, Cham.
Gao, Y. J., Chang, W. C.,Fang, W. T., & Lin, R (2018). Acculturation in human culture interaction - a case study of culture meaning in cultural product design. Ergonomics International Journal, 2(1), 1-10.
Handa, R. (1999). Against arbitrariness: architectural signification in the age of globalization. Design Studies, 20(4), 363-380.
Hasell, M. J., & Benhamou, R. (1988). Interior design: a dynamic systems view. Journal of Interior Design, 14(2), 13-22.
Holec, H. (1987). The learner as manager: managing learning or managing to learn. Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 145-157.
Jones, M., & Samalionis, F. (2008). From small ideas to radical service innovation. Design Management Review, 19(1), 20-26.
Juran, J., & Gryna, F. M. (1988). Juran1’s quality control handbook(4th ed). New York: McGrawHill.
Jakobson, R. (1956). Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. Selected Writings, 7, 113-121.
Jakobson, R. (1987). Language in literature. The Belknap Press of Harvard.
Kim, B., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2009). Not just fun, but serious strategies: using meta-cognitive strategies in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 52(4), 800-810.
Kingman-Brundage, J. (1989). The ABCs of service system blueprinting. Designing a Winning Service Strategy, 30-43.
Leong, D., & Clark, H. (2003). Culture-based knowledge to towards new design thinking and practice - a dialogue. Design Issues, 19(3), 48-58.
Lin, R. T. (2007). Transforming taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: a case study of cross-cultural product design model. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 45-53.
Lin, C. L., Chen, C. L., Chen, S. J., & Lin, R. (2015). The cognition of turning poetry into painting, Journal of US-China Education Review B, 5(8), 471-487.
Lin, R., Hsieh, H. Y., Sun, M. X., & Gao, Y. J. (2016, July). From ideality to reality-a case study of mondrian style. In International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 365-376). Springer, Cham.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic.
Norman, D. A. (1997). Strategy training in the language classroom: an empirical investigation. RELC journal, 28(2), 56-81.
Oliver, R. L.(1981). Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction processes in retail settings. Journal of Retailing, 57(3), 25-48.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Petre, M., & Sharp, H. (2006). Complexity through combination: an account of knitwear design. Design Studies, 27(2), 183-222.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving . Orlando, FI: Academic Press.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana Uni, 111.
Shostack, G. L. (1982). How to design a service. European Journal of Marketing, 16(1), 49-63.
Shostack, G. L.(1987). Service positioning through structural change. Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 34-43.
Sigfried, G. (1982). Time and architecture-the growth of a new tradition. Cambridge. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1998). The impact of purchase involvement on the quality-value relationship. In Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, University of Otago, Dunedin (pp. 2545-2551).
Talbot, D. C. (1995). Metacognitive strategy training for reading: developing second language learners' awareness of expository textpatterns. HKU Theses Online.
Yair, K., Press, M., & Tomes, A. (2001). Crafting competitive advantage: crafts knowledge as a strategic resource. Design Studies, 22(4), 377-394.
Yair, K., Tomes, A., & Press, M. (1999). Design through marking: crafts knowledge as facilitator to collaborative new product development. Design Studies, 20(6), 495-515.
Zec, P., & Burkhard, J. (2010). Design value: a strategy for business success. Red Dot.
Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L., (2000). Service marketing: integrating customer focus across the firm. McGraw-Hill, New York.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE