:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:司法詢問員制度應用於兒童性侵害案件之實證研究
作者:溫翎佑
作者(外文):WEN , LING-YU
校院名稱:中央警察大學
系所名稱:警察政策研究所
指導教授:黃翠紋
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:司法詢問性侵害兒童被害人forensic interviewsexual assaultchild victim
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
2017年1月1日我國司法詢問員制度隨性侵害犯罪防治法第15條之1的施行,正式在我國實施。本研究為瞭解該制度於實務單位運作情形及對兒童性侵害被害人詢(訊)問之影響,以對該議題有瞭解之檢察官、警察人員與具有司法詢問經驗且為衛生福利部列冊之專業人士,和相關業務承辦人員為研究對象,進行深度訪談,共計訪談13位。
本研究綜合分析後發現,性侵害犯罪防治法15條之1施行前,已有專家學者協助特殊需求兒童之司法詢問,我國司法詢問員制度肇於民間團體想改善檢警人員詢(訊)問性侵害被害人兒童方式,在推行該制度之後,對提升檢警人員詢(訊)問能力確實產生助益,檢警機關目前運作模式仍維持以受過訓練之所屬人員詢(訊)問為主,至非具檢警人員身分之衛生福利部列冊專業人士以輔助詢(訊)問居多。究其原因,現行衛生福利部專業人士司法詢問員培訓內容,僅適用於檢警人員之司法詢問訓練,難以產生能夠詢問特殊需求之性侵害被害兒童、具備更專司法詢問能力者。因專業人士能力與檢警和司法機關需求有落差,致影響實務機關聘用意願。此外,衛生福利部列冊專業人士相關監督管理機制未建立,專業人士與檢警和司法機關的合作要件與程序亦未制度化等,在執行面上產生有列冊專業人士協助詢(訊)問的案件不見得能獲得更多案件調查資訊、早期(專業)鑑定制度吸收專業人士的運用、團隊融合不易等問題,使得相較於早期(專業)鑑定的醫療團隊,列冊專業人士的專業性信賴度較低,恐不利我國司法詢問員制度長期發展。
為期司法詢問員制度能落實,並進而發揮保障性侵害被害兒童司法權益效能,本研究建議我國司法詢問員制度維持現行雙軌制,佔較高比率的一般性侵害被害兒童,基於掌握詢(訊)問時效及經濟效益的原則下,維持過去的方式,以承辦案件且受過訓練的檢警與司法人員為主要詢(訊)問者,對於少數有特殊需求之兒童被害人則交由具備司法詢問專業的學者專家詢(訊)問為宜,以收彈性運用之效。另外在對檢警與審判機關建議方面,主要有五點:一、結構式司法詢問架構應可提升檢警與司法人員詢(訊)問品質,宜持續推廣使用;二、警察人員養成教育可納入司法詢問訓練課程,另法務部核發之證書應定期換發;三、提出需求的專業人士類型;四、建立合作機制;五、持續評估司法詢問架構的適用性並因應我國法律做調整。對主管機關衛生福利部建議亦有五點:一、建立專業人士管理機制;二、盤點目前列冊專業人士司法詢問能力;三、檢討現行培訓及檢核制度;四、列冊人員應回應檢警與審判機關對司法詢問人才需求;五、補助特殊需求兒童案件早期鑑定經費。
The Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act was amended in 2017 to announce the addition of 15-1 Article took forensic interviewer into Taiwan. The Act was formally implemented since 2017. In order to understand the issue of operation and the impact on the child sexual assault inquiry, the author of this research interviewed 13 subjects including prosecutors, police officers, experts with rich inquiry experience and related business undertakers.
This research found that experts and scholars have already assisted the judicial inquiry of children Sexual Assault with special needs before the implementation of Article 15-1. In Taiwan, forensic interview system was funded for the requirement of NGO to improve the inquiry of police officers. This system has indeed helped to enhance the inquiry (information) ability of the investigators. The current mode of field operation still maintained to carry out children Sexual Assault inquiry by the trained investigators. And most of forensic interviewer were asked to be assistants during the inquiry . The reason is that the training content of the forensic interview in the Ministry of Health and Welfare is more suitable for the investigators, but it is not customized to train an expert of child sexual assault victim inquiry. Besides, due to the gap exists between the forensic interviewer ability and the needs of the police and the judiciary, it will affect the willingness of the police and the judiciary to hire a forensic interviewer to do inquiry. In addition, the supervision, management and regulations of forensic interviewer system are not yet established. On the executive side, there are some problems to deal with such as that listed forensic interviewers are unable to obtain more investigation information during assisting inquiries, there is no Model for Early Identification of Sexual Assault Case by Professional Group to absorb the use of forensic interviewers, team integration is not easy, etc. Compared to the Early Identification of Sexual Assault Case by Professional Group, the trust for forensic interviewers, who are listed professionals, is low. Those problems may adversely affect the long-term development of the forensic interviewer system in Taiwan.
To implement the system of forensic interviewer effectively and to protect the interest of sexual assault child victims, this study suggests that the forensic interviewer system maintains the current dual-track system, which accounts for higher proportion of general sexual assault child victims. Based on the principle of quotation and economic efficiency, trained prosecutors and enforcement officers should be in charge of inquiry. For a small number of sexual assault child victims with special needs, the author advises to make it flexible to let the forensic interviewers, who are professional, carry out the inquiry. Moreover, there are five recommendations to the enforcement officers and the court. First, the structured protocol should be promoted and applied continuously, which could enhance the quality of the inquiry of the police officers and prosecutors. Second, the education of the police should be incorporated into the forensic interview course. And the certificate issued by the Ministry of Justice should be reissued regularly. Third, submit the type of forensic interviewer base on the field demand. Forth, establish a cooperative mechanism. And the last, continuously assess of the applicability of the forensic interview protocol and adjust the current laws as response. There are five suggestions for Ministry of Health and Welfare. First, establish a management mechanism of forensic interviewers. Second, inventory the current capacity of listed forensic interviewers. Third, review the current training and inspection system. Forth, listed forensic interviewer should respond to the needs of the judicial and judicial authorities in inquiry. Fifth, raise the funds of the Early Identification of Sexual Assault Case for the sexual assault child victims with special needs.
一、中文文獻
內政部(2004)。「性侵害案件減少被害人重複陳述作業」方案成效評估研究。
王文科(1993)。教育研究法。台北:五南圖書出版社。
王如玄(2015)。刑法妨害性自主罪修法後法實踐之我見。社區法展季刊,149,頁91-101。
王寬弘(2009)。我國犯罪被害人保護執行成效之研究--以犯罪被害人保護法保護對象為例,中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
王燦槐(2001)。我國性侵害受害者服務政策之分析-談官方性侵害防治中心的服務困境。中大社會文化學報,11,頁1-28。
王燦槐(2005)。性侵害防治中心在司法流程中的角色-減少性侵害被害人重複陳述作業之評析。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,1(1),頁111-136。
司法院(2003)。美國、加拿大少年家事業務之研究。臺灣高雄少年法院主辦,司法院少年及家事廳、臺灣高等法院暨所屬法院九十二年度法官及其他司法人員出國考察報告。
年代新聞。又見恐龍法官?性侵6歲女童二審判無罪,2010年9月27日。
何明晃(2009)。少年法院(庭)調查性侵害事件減少被害人重複陳述注意事項」之檢討─兼論減述作業流程之爭議。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,5(1),頁1-24。
余貞治(2014)。警察詢問性侵害案件兒童被害人之研究。中央警察大學刑事警察研究所碩士論文。
吳傳銘、詹景全、黃瑞雯(2011)。赴美參訪兒童保護及性侵害防治業務考察報告。臺北市政府社會局。
吳維雅(2007)。「你相不相信孩子」?-論兒童性侵害案件中之兒童證人及專家證人兼評台灣高等法院92年少連上訴的218號刑事判決。檢察新論,1,頁131-151。
李佳玟(2011)。走出信與不信的迷宮-論兒童性侵害案之程序問題與改進之道。國際刑事法學會台灣分會圓桌論壇。
李建璋(2011)。兒童性侵害評估。台灣醫界,54(5),頁257-260。
李晉偉(2014)。淺談美國兒童證人司法訪談員制度-從偵查實務角度研析。刑事雙月刊,63,頁54-59。
李翠玲、林俊杰(2018)。兒童與心智障礙性侵害被害者司法詢(訊)問模式相關問題初探(上)。法務通訊第2885期。
林志潔、吳耀宗、金孟華、劉芳伶、王士帆(2017)。性侵害案件無罪原因分析之研究-以強制性交案件為中心。法務部委託研究。
林淑貞譯(2001)。辯方證人。Loftus, E. & Ketcham, K.原著(1991), Witness for the defense: the accused, the eyewitness, and the expert who puts memory on trial.台北:商周出版社。
金孟華(2010)。從女性主義法學觀察性侵害法律改革之演進。國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
施志鴻(2014)。英國偵查式詢問之簡介。執法新知論衡,10(2),頁101-130。
胡幼慧(2000)。質性研究—理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流圖書公司。
范國勇、謝靜琪、陳建安、周偉捷(2012)。性侵害問題之調查研究。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究。
韋愛梅(2009)。美國SART模式介紹。刑事雙月刊,30,頁23-26。
馬慧(2014)。防止虐待兒童的法律對策—以日本為例。南京廣拜電視大學學報,2014年1期,頁42-45。
張瑋心(2014)。性侵兒童案件之程序法研究—美國法之啟示。中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所博士論文。
張錦麗(2005)。台灣地區「性侵害被害人減少重複陳述方案」之行動研究。暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系博士論文。
許春金(2010)。犯罪學,台北:三民書局總經銷。
許春金、馬傳鎮、陳玉書、王珮玲、蔡田木、李樹中、盧淑惠(1999)。台灣地區性侵害犯罪狀況與型態之調查研究。內政部家庭暴力及性侵害防治委員會委託研究。
郭文東(2008)。台灣保護業務之概況。2008犯罪被害人保護業務國際交流研討會論文集,財團法人犯罪被害人保護協會。
郭若萱、林燦璋(2011)。對目擊證人使用認知詢問法之分析。警學叢刊,41(6),頁97-113。
陳昱如、周愫嫻(2016),從兒童性侵害案件看兒童性同意權與證述能力,刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(19),頁201-226
陳慈幸(2008)。被害者學與犯罪被害人保護之現狀與未來趨向 刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(11) ,頁 51-62。臺北:法務部。
陳慧女、林明傑(2003)。兒童性侵害案件中的專家證人與兒童作證。社區發展季刊,103,頁212-224。
華筱玲、沈瓊桃(2014)。論兒童性侵害案件驗傷採證和詢問工作。司法周刊,1694,頁2-3。
華筱玲、張淑慧、鄭瑞隆(2016)。兒少性侵害案件應用兒童證人司法訪談範本效果評估研究,衛生福利部委託研究。
鈕文英(2013)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。臺北:雙葉書廊。
黃富源(2008)。司法心理學的議題與難題。檢察新論,3,頁118-137,台灣高等法院檢察署。
黃富源(2016)。資料蒐集方式(四):非侵入性之方法、次級資料分析、官方統計資料之利用。刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法。臺北:五南出版社
黃翠紋(2013) 。婦幼安全政策分析, 台北:五南圖書出版公司。
黃翠紋(2013)。我國性侵害防治政策推動現況及未來展望。社區發展季刊,142,頁39-50。
黃翠紋、陳佳雯(2012)。我國性侵害防治政策推動現況之研究。警政論叢,12,頁1-31。
葉毓蘭 (2011)。以被害人為中心的刑事偵訊:以性侵害與人口販運為例。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集(14) ,頁 149-177。臺北:法務部。
趙善如、陸悌、蔡景宏、張麗珠、林宏陽、郭致遠(2014)。高雄市性侵害案件專業團隊早期鑑定模式成效評估研究案。高雄市政府社會局家庭暴力暨性侵害防治中心委託研究報告。
劉峻谷(2006)。性侵孫女?阿公判無罪。聯合報2006年11月19日A8版。
鄭瑞隆(2017)。NICHD 司法詢問技術於兒少性侵害案件之運用。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集20期,頁271-288。
賴月蜜(2009)。小娃兒進衙門-談司法與社工在「兒童出庭」的保護。社區發展季刊128期,頁86-98。
霍春亨、王淑慧(2013)。性侵害案件一站式服務內涵之初探一以台北市為例。犯罪學期刊,16(2),頁151-180。
二、英文文獻
Anderson, G., Anderson, J. & Gilgun, J. (2014). The Influence of Narrative Practice Techniques on Child Behaviors in Forensic Interviews. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23(6), 615-634.
Benson, M. & Powell, M. (2015). Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(3), 309-322
Bolen, R.(2001) . Extra-familial Sexual Abuse. Child Sexual Abuse: Its Scope and Our Failure. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Brackmann, N. (2013). Interviewing Children with the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Investigative Interviewing (NICHD) Protocol. Interviewing Child Witnesses - Proceedings of the Erasmus Mundus Joint PhD in Legal Psychology Theoretical Course Interviewing Child Witnesses,45-52.
Bruck, M., Ceci, S. and Francoeur, E. (2000). Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to report genital touching in a medical examination: Developmental and gender comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(1), 74-83.
Butler, E. (2001). Anatomy of the McMartin child molestation case. Lanham: University Press of America.
Ceci, S. & Bruck, M. (2009). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association..
Cederborg, A., Alm, C., Lima da Silva Nises, D. & Lamb, M. (2013). Investigative interviewing of alleged child abuse victims: an evaluation of a new training programme for investigative interviewers. Police Practice and Research, 14(3), 242-254.
Cheit, R. (2014). The Witch-Hunt Narrative: Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2017) .The Child Abuse and Neglect User Manual Series. Available online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/usermanual.cfm.搜尋日期:2017年5月8日。
Clark,A.(2013). Child Witnesses: A Short Review of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Interviewing Protocol.Interviewing Child Witnesses - Proceedings of the Erasmus Mundus Joint PhD in Legal Psychology Theoretical Course Interviewing Child Witnesses ,36-44.
Crabtree, B. and Miller, W. (1992). Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Cyr, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec. Child Abuse and Neglect,33, 257-268.
Davies, D. & Faller, K.C. (2007). Interviewing children with special needs. In K. C. Faller, Interviewing children about sexual abuse: Controversies and best practice (pp. 152–163). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, C. S. (1993). Court School: Supporting Child Witness. Children Today, 22(1), 10-12.
Everson .M.(2012).Child Forensic Interviewing at Age 30: Virtuous to a Fault.Paper presented at the San Diego International Conference on Child and Family Maltreatment, San Diego, CA, USA,26 January.
Faller, K. (2007 ). Interview Structure, Guidelines, and Protocol. Interviewing Children about Sexual Abuse: Controversies and Best Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 66–89.
Faller, K. (2014). Forty Years of Forensic Interviewing of Children Suspected of Sexual Abuse, 1974–2014: Historical Benchmarks. Social Sciences, 4(1), 34-65.
Faller, K.& Hewitt,S.( 2007). Special Considerations for Cases Involving Young Children.” Interviewing Children about Sexual Abuse: Controversies and Best Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 142–151.
Faller, K.(2000).Child Maltreatment and Child Protection in the United States. Maltreatment in Early Childhood: Tools for Research-Based Intervention. New York: Haworth Press.
Faller, K.(2003) .Working with Protective Services and the Police. Understanding and Assessing Child Sexual Maltreatment, (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Faller, K., Grabarek, M. and Ortega, R. (2010). Commitment to child welfare work: What predicts leaving and staying?.Children and Youth Services Review, 32(6), 840-846.
Faller, K., Grabarek, M. and Ortega, R. (2010). Commitment to child welfare work: What predicts leaving and staying? Children and Youth Services Review, 32(6), 840-846.
Finkelhor, D. (2008).Childhood Victimization: Violence, Crime, and Abuse in the Lives of Young People. New York: Oxford University Press.
Finkelhor, D.(1979) Sexually Victimized Children. New York: The Free Press,.
Finkelhor, D., Williams, L. & Burns, N. (1993). Nursery crimes : Sexual Abuse in Day Care. Newbury Park: Sage.
Finkelhor,D.(1984).Sexual abuse as a social problem.In Child Sexual Abuse: NewTheory and Research. New York: The Free Pres.
Fontes, L. (2000). Interviewing immigrant children and families about child maltreatment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Forgey, M. A., Badger, L., Gilbert, T., & Hansen, J. (2013). Using standardized clients to train social workers in intimate violent partner assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 49, 292-306.
Goodman,G.S.(2006).Children's Eyewitness Memory: A Modern History and Contemporary Commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62(4),811–832.
Hechler, D.(1989). The Battle and the Backlash: The Child Sexual Abuse War. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Henry, J. (1997). System intervention trauma to child sexual abuse victims following disclosure. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12(4), 499-512.
Henry, K, C. (1978).Sexual abuse: Another hidden problem. Pediatrics ,62,382–89.
Hershkowitz, I., & Terner, A. (2007). The effects of repeated interviewing on children’s forensic statements of sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 1131–1143.
Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D. & Lamb, M. (2005). Trends in children's disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(11), 1203-1214.
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(3),336-344.
Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M., Katz, C. and Malloy, L. (2013). Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse?Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 6-14.
Hewitt, S. (1999). Assessing allegations of sexual abuse in preschool children: Listening to small voices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hewitt, S.(1999). Assessing Allegations of Sexual Abuse in Preschool Children: Listening to Small Voices. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications,
Home Office. (1992).Memorandum of Good Practice on Video Recorded Interviews with Child Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
Home Office. (2011). Guidance for Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings.
Jennifer M. Schaaf, Daniel Bederian-Gardner,& Gail S. Goodman, (2015). Gating out misinformation: Can young children follow instructions to ignore false information?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33, 390-406.
Jones, D & McQuiston, M.(1986). Interviewing the Sexually Abused Child. Denver: Kempe National Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse.
Katz, C. & Hershkowitz, I. (2009). The Effects of Drawing on Children’s Accounts of Sexual Abuse. Child Maltreatment, 15(2), 171-179.
Kinnear, K.(2007).Child Sexual Abuse: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, Inc.
La Rooy, D., Lamb, M. & Memon, A. (2010). Forensic Interviews with Children in Scotland: A Survey of Interview Practices Among Police. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26(1), 26-34.
Lamb, M. Hershkowitz ,I . Orbach, Y. & Esplin ,P. (2008).Tell Me What Happened:Structured Investigative Interviews of Child Victims and Witnesses. West Sussex:Wiley-Blackwell.
Lamb, M., &Garretson,M. E.(2003) The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews. Law and Human Behavior 27,157–71.
Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11-12), 1201-1231.
Lamb, M., Sternberg, K., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D. & Esplin, P. (2002). The Effects of Intensive Training and Ongoing Supervision on the Quality of Investigative Interviews With Alleged Sex Abuse Victims. Applied Developmental Science, 6(3), 114-125.
Lamb,M. Hershkowitz,I., Orbach,Y. & Esplin ,P.W.(2008). Structured Investigative Interviews of Child Victims and Witnesses. Wiley.
Lamb,M.(1994).The Investigation of Child Sexual Abuse: An International, Interdisciplinary Consensus Statement.” Family Law Quarterly,28,1021–1028.
Lyon, T. (2014). Interviewing Children. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 73-89.
Malloy, L., Lyon, T., & Quas, J. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(2), 162–170.
Myers, J. (1994). The Backlash: Child Protection under Fire.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Naka ,M .(2014).A Training Program for Investigative Interviewing of Children ,in Investigative Interviewing, Springer NewYork Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Olafson .E, David. L. C, and Roland C. S. (1993) .Modern history of child sexual abuse awareness:Cycles of discovery and suppression.Child Abuse & Neglect ,17,7–24.
Oregon Department of Justice, Crime Victims’ Services Division, Child Abuse
Poole, D, & Lamb, M. (1998) .A Flexible Interview Protocol. Investigative Interviews of Children. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association, 105–112.
Powell, M. B., & Barnett, M. (2014). Elements underpinning successful implementation of a national best-practice child investigative interviewing framework. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22, 368-377.
Powell, M., Cassematis, P., Benson, M., Smallbone, S. & Wortley, R. (2014). Police officers’ strategies for coping with the stress of investigating Internet child exploitation. Traumatology: An International Journal, 20(1), 32-42.
Powell, M., Fisher, R. & Hughes-Scholes, C. (2008). The effect of intra- versus post-interview feedback during simulated practice interviews about child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(2), 213-227.
Price, H. & Roberts, K. (2011). The effects of an intensive training and feedback program on police and social workers' investigative interviews of children. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 43(3), 235-244.
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 183-186.
Saywitz, K.(1989).Children‘s conceptions of the legal system: Court is a place to play basketball. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross & M. P. Toglia(Eds.), Perspectives on Children’s Testimony. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sharman, S. , Hughes-Scholes, C., Powell, M., & Guadagno, B. (2012). Police officers’ ability to play the role of the child during investigative interview training. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 14, 312-321.
Sisti, H. M., Glassi, A. L., & Shors, T. J. (2007). Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: Learning over time enhances memory and the survival of new neurons. Learning and Memory, 14, 368-375.
Smets, L. & Rispens,I .(2014). Investigative Interviewing and Training:The Investigative Interviewer Apprentice,in Investigative Interviewing, Springer NewYork Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Smets, L. (2012). Police investigative interviewing – A new training approach, Reeks Politiestudies, Antwerpen: Maklu.
Son, L. K. (2004). Spacing one's study: Evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 601-604.
Sternberg, K., Lamb, M., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. & Hovav, M. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children's abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21(11), 1133-1146.
Stewart, H., Katz, C., & La Rooy, D. J. (2011). Training forensic interviewers. Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Summit, R. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse & Neglect, 7, 177–193.
T Tedesco, J. & Schnell, S. (1987). Children's reactions to sex abuse investigation and litigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11(2), 267-272.
Thierry, K., Lamb, M., Orbach, Y. & Pipe, M. (2005). Developmental Differences in the Function and Use of Anatomical Dolls During Interviews With Alleged Sexual Abuse Victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1125-1134.
Turk, V. & Brown, H. (2010). The Sexual Abuse of Adults with Learning Disabilites: Results of A Two Year Incidence Survey. Mental Handicap Research, 6(3), 193-216.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.(1993).Child Sexual Abuse: Intervention and Treatment Issues. Washington,D.C.
Yuille, J. C., Marxsen, D., & Cooper, B. (1999). Training investigative interviewers: Adherence to the spirit, as well as the letter. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 323-336.
三、網路資料
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC)( 2012) .Practice Guidelines: Forensic Interviewing in Cases of Suspected Child Abuse. Available online: http://www.apsac.org/practice-guidelines.搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC)(1990). Practice Guidelines:Psychosocial Evaluation of Suspected Sexual Abuse in Young Children . Available online:http://www.apsac.org/practice-guidelines.搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC).( 1997) .Practice Guidelines:Psychosocial Evaluation of Suspected Sexual Abuse in Young Children, 2nd ed.”Available online: http://www.apsac.org/practice-guidelines.搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
Anderson, J., Ellefson J., Lashley J., Miller A. L., Olinger A., Russell A.&Weigman J. (2010). The CornerHouse forensic interview protocol: RATAC®. Thomas M. Cooley Journal of Practical and Clinical Law, 12, 193–331. Available online: https://www.cornerhousemn.org/images/CornerHouse_RATAC_Protocol.pdf搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
Child Welfare Information Gateway (2011).Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010,11–320.Available online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/federal/index.cfm?event=federalLegislation.viewLegis&id=142.搜尋日期:2017年5月8日。
Children’s Bureau (2011).Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 . Available online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/federal/index.cfm?event=federalLegislation.viewLegis&id=142.搜尋日期:2017年4月11日。
CornerHouse.( 2013) .Forensic Interview Protocol. Available online:http://www.cornerhousemn.org/forensicinterviews.html尋日期:2017年5月30日。
CornerHouse.(2017) “Interagency Child Abuse Evaluation Center.” Available online:http://www.cornerhousemn.org/timeline.html搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
CornerHouse.(2017). Timeline. Available online: http://www.cornerhousemn.org/timeline.html,搜尋日期:2017年4月11日。
Gunderson National Child Protection Training Center. Training. Available online: http://www.gundersenhealth.org/ncptc/trainings. http://nationalcac.org/events/bfi-training.html 搜尋日期:2017年5月30日
Harborview Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress, and WA State Criminal Justice Training Commission. Washington State Child Interview Guide. Available online: http://depts.washington.edu/hcsats/PDF/guidelines/WA%20State%20Child%20Interview%20Guide%202009%202010.pdf.搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
Midwest Region Children’s Advocacy Center. (2013) .Key Survey Findings National Multi-Site Survey of Children’s Advocacy Centers..Available online: http://www.mrcac.org/content/uploads/2014/02/2013-Key-Survey-Findings.FINAL_.pdf 搜尋日期2017年5月30日。
Ministry of Justice.(2011) Achieving the Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings 2011: Conducting Interviews with Children. Available online: http://llrscb.proceduresonline.com/chapters/g_achv_best_evid.html#conducting_interv_ch 搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
Multidisciplinary Intervention (CAMI) Program.(2012) “Oregon Interviewing Guidelines, Third Edition,.” Available online: http://www.doj.state.or.us/victims/pdf/oregon_interviewing_guidelines.pdf 搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
National Children’s Advocacy Center. About the NCAC Child Abuse Library Online (CALiO).Available online: http://www.nationalcac.org/calio-library/about-the-ncac-child-abuse-reseachlibrary-搜尋日期:2017年5月30日
National Children’s Advocacy Center.(2017). Forensic Interview of Children Training. Available online: http://nationalcac.org/events/bfi-training.html 搜尋日期:2017年5月30日
National Children’s Advocacy Center.(2017). History. Available online: http://www.nationalcac.org/history/history.html#搜尋日期:2017年4月11日。
National Children’s Alliance.(2011). Standards for Accredited Members Revised 2011. Available online: http://www.nationalchildrensalliance.org/sites/default/files/download-files/NCARevised StandardsforMembers_0.pdf ,搜尋日期:2017年4月11日。
NICHD Protocol and Translated Versions.Available online: http://nichdprotocol.com/thenichd-protocol/搜尋日期:2017年5月30日.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.(2015).Child Forensic Interviewing Best Practices. Available at:https://www.ojjdp.gov/pubs/248749.pdf 搜尋日期:2017年4月11日。.
Rapport, Anatomy Identification, Touch Inquiry, Abuse Scenario, and Closure (RATAC).CornerHouse/Finding Words Training Manual. Available online: http://rtmq.infosathse.com/Kansas/ratac.htm搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
State of Michigan Governor’s Task Force on Child Abuse and Neglect and Department of Human Services. Forensic Interviewing Protocol, 3rd ed. Available online: http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dhs/DHS-PUB-0779_211637_7.pdf 搜尋日期:2017年5月30日。
朱惠英(2016)。當兒童成為被害人,其證言如何被聽見?網址:http://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/4098,搜尋日期:2017年3月7日。
法務部(2015)。加強犯罪被害人保護方案簡介。網址:https://www.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=366673&ctNode=37182&mp=001,搜尋日期:2017年6月27日。
法務部(2017)。2017年犯罪被害人保護方案。網址:http://www.dlit.edu.tw/studentaffairs/board/data/20174193253477.pdf,搜尋日期:2017年6月27日。
法務部(2017)。地方法院檢察署執行性侵害案件裁判確定情形統計。網址:http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWEB/common/SubMenu.aspx?menu=INF_COMMON,搜尋日期:2017年7月20日。
法務部(2017)。地方法院檢察署辦理性侵害案件偵查收結件數。網址:http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWEB/common/SubMenu.aspx?menu=INF_COMMON,搜尋日期:2017年7月20日。
高雄地方法院檢察署(2014),性侵害案件減述流程及兒童、心智障礙者早期鑑定之簡介,網址:http://www.ksc.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=339066&ctNode=23691&mp=021。搜尋日期:2018年3月20日。
現代婦女基金會(2018)。司法詢問員制度與培力。網址:https://www.38.org.tw/initiative2.asp?p_kind=%E7%8F%BE%E4%BB%A3%E5%80%A1%E8%AD%B0&p_kind2=%E5%8F%B8%E6%B3%95%E8%A9%A2%E5%95%8F%E5%93%A1%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E8%88%87%E5%9F%B9%E5%8A%9B。搜尋日期:2018年4月20日。
陳怡利(2014)。性侵害案件減述流程及兒童、心智障礙者早期鑑定之簡介。台灣高雄地方法院檢察署。網址:http://www.ksc.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=339066&ctNode=23691&mp=021。搜尋日期:2017年3月20日。
陳慧女(2016)。辨識兒童性侵害及被害人的保護服務。反性別暴力電子報,12。網址:http://tagvedm.mohw.gov.tw/epaper_1.php?content=editor_report&id=144,搜尋日期2017年7月20日。
黃菁瑜(2013)。美國國家兒童健康與人類發展中心偵察審問程序。網址:http://cfrc.ntu.edu.tw/knowledge_03-2.php?info_id=387,搜尋日期:2016年11月30日。
衛生福利部(2016)。家內性侵害-暗夜哭泣的孩子。反性別暴力電子報,12。網址:http://tagvedm.mohw.gov.tw/epaper_1.php?content=editor_report&id=144,搜尋日期2017年7月20日。
衛生福利部(2017)。性侵害事件通報被害人年齡統計。網址:https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=cnujL3dbo2qWZux5VTc%2bbw%3d%3d&d=m9ww9odNZAz2Rc5Ooj%2fwIQ%3d%3d,搜尋日期:2017年7月20日。
衛生福利部(2017)。性侵害通報件數統計。網址:https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_Category.aspx?fs=jw0bIEF46cR1iPSYA35XlQ%3d%3d&cs1=j4OJB%2fx9ZkKPvc%2fvmatJ4g%3d%3d&cs2=xk0hVsyjD3bX1JiQ2L%2blVA%3d%3d,搜尋日期:2017年7月20日。
衛生福利部(2017)。攜手再造性侵害防治的溫柔革命。網址:http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-8922-1.html,搜尋日期:2017年7月20日
勵馨基金會(2014)。誰來拯救蘿莉塔?-沒嘴巴的家內性侵兒童,網址:https://www.goh.org.tw/mobile/news_detail.asp?PKey=aBSUaB33aBTJaB30aBYIaB31&Class1=aBTQaB32。搜尋日期:2017年3月20日。

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top