家庭暴力相對人處遇團體之重要事件分析__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	家庭暴力相對人處遇團體之重要事件分析
作者：	鍾易廷
作者(外文)：	Chung, Yi-Ting
校院名稱：	國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱：	諮商心理與復健諮商研究所
指導教授：	卓紋君
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2019
主題關鍵詞：	重要事件；家庭暴力相對人；處遇團體；significant event；domestic violence；treatment group
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:1 共同引用:0 點閱:2

本研究探討家庭暴力相對人處遇團體中領導者與成員的重要事件、雙方對於重要事件的相同與相異之處，以及領導者與成員對於重要事件的後續處理。本研究採取立意取樣方式，邀請1位領導者與5位成員為研究對象，以簡短結構性回憶法（Brief Structured Recall, BSR）進行訪談，蒐集相關資料後以發現式取向進行資料分析。
本研究發現領導者認為對在12週團體中有助益的重要事件有14個主題，無助益重要事件有6個主題；成員認為對團體有助益的重要事件有18個主題，無助益重要事件有3個主題。
比較團體領導者與成員的重要事件，雙方關注在同一件事情，但是關注重點不同的主題可分為5大類：一、與課程主題有關；二、與成員自我探索有關、三與成員互動交流有關；四、與情緒宣洩有關與五、與負向經驗有關。兩者不同之處，在於領導者為了協助成員自我探索，需要不斷的評估與理解成員及團體動力，故重視「瞭解成員的狀態與風格」與「理解成員間的互動」，且領導者為了讓團體能夠順利進行，也會關注到「中斷成員重複的描述」與「維護成員的面子讓其更投入團體」。
以重要事件的後續處理角度來看，團體成員們的重要事件可分為3類，第一類是團體進行的當下，成員並未立即反映的有助益重要事件。第二類則是團體進行的當下，成員有立即反映的有助益重要事件，領導者多半給予支持、肯定或是引導其他成員給予回饋。第三類則是無助益重要事件，但成員在團體進行的當下仍未立即反映，領導者在當下也沒有察覺與進行處理，不過領導者會在團體後有覺察與瞭解，並在後續團體做出調整。
最後，研究者根據研究結果提出對團體實務工作者之建議：一、課程主題與成員經驗分享並重；二、多瞭解、評估成員的狀態與成員間的互動；三、適時讓成員情緒宣洩；四、多邀請成員在團體當下回饋想法與感受；與五、彈性活用課程主題。對家庭暴力相關機構之建議：讓相對人完整參與團體。對未來研究之建議：一、採用其他方案或學派來進行重要事件相關研究；二、可以採用更多元或單一議題的處遇團體來探討團體的重要事件內涵；三、研究對象的人數能夠控制在8-12人；與四、再多設置一位觀察員。以提供實務工作者、相關機構與後續研究參考。

以文找文

The purpose of this study is to explore the significant events of the leader and members in the domestic violence treatment group, and focus on the same and the opposite perspectives between the leader and the members, and their reactions after the significant events. The researcher adopted purposeful sampling, and interviewed the leader and five members. The data was collected by brief structured recall interviews. Then researchers analyzed the content of interviews by discovery oriented.
As a result of the comprehensive analysis, this study found 14 themes of helpful significant events and 6 themes of nonhelpless significant events in leader’s perception, and 18 themes of helpful significant events and 3 themes of nonhelpless significant events in members’ perception.
The similar but different perceptive themes between the leader and the members were classified into 1. learning, 2. self-exploration, 3. interaction, 4. emotional catharsis, and 5. negative experience. The leader paid more attention to “understand members’ state and style”, “understand their interactions between members”, “interrupt the members’ repeat narratives”, and “maintain the members’ self-respect” because to make the group working.
The leader didn’t deal with some helpful important events because members didn’t reflect immediately. When the members reflected immediately, the leader supported, approved, or leaded other members to give back. The leader also didn’t deal with some nonhelpless significant events, but she introspected and recognized after this session, and adjusted in the following session.
Finally, some practical suggestions and reference are prepared for the leaders of domestic violence treatment group: 1. Course themes and emotional catharsis are important equivalently. 2. More understand and assess members’ statuses and interactions. 3. Make members vent emotions suitably. 4. Invite members to share their thought and feelings frequently. 5. Use Course themes flexibly. For relative institutions: make members participate full course. And for further study: 1. Use different theories or programs to research the significant events. 2. Use single theme or multiple themes to research the contents of significant events. 3. Control 8-12 participants in the research group. 4. Add one more observer.

以文找文

一、中文文獻

王行（2005）。台灣地區已婚男性對夫妻性別角色觀念之研究。東吳社會工作學報，3，47-78。
王美懿、林東龍與王增勇（2010）。「病人」、「犯人」或「個人」？男性家暴「加害人」之再認識。社會政策與社會工作學刊，14（2），147–193。doi: 10.6785/SPSW.201012.0147
王思賢（2005）。家庭暴力面面觀。台中縣家庭暴力防治—社區工作者研習，7-15。台中縣：社團法人中華溝通分析學會。
王珮玲與黃志中（2005）。家庭暴力加害人處遇模式成效評估之研究。內政部補助。
內政部（2017，10月18日）․內政部統計年報。檢索http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/year/y09-02.xls
家庭暴力防治法（2005年2月4日修正）。檢索http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=D0050071
成蒂（2004）。終結婚姻暴力－加害人處遇與諮商。台北：心理。
成蒂（2006）。婚姻暴力加害人處遇與司法體系之連結。應用心理研究，32，101-133。
汪美鳳（2005）。家庭暴力臨床實務工作模式現況運用及暴力相關因素探討。澄清醫護管理雜誌，1（2），26-33。doi: 10.30156/CCMJ.200504.0004
李珊、林烝增、林家興與許玉霜（2017）。男性還是女性更具攻擊性？大學生約會暴力相關因素之探究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，31，103-130。doi: 10.6308/JCPRC.201711_(31).0004
李娟娟、張達人、謝宏林、王梅麗與張芳榮（2005）。婚姻暴力加害人認知教育與情緒支持性團體之療效探討。中華團體心理治療，11(3)，1-18。doi: 10.30060/CGP.200509.0001
吳秀碧、洪雅鳳與羅家玲（2003）。團體諮商歷程中領導者意圖與聚焦之分析研究。中華輔導學報，13，117-150。
吳秀碧、許育光、洪雅鳳與羅家玲（2004）。非結構諮商團體過程中領導者技術運用之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，17（3），23-56。doi: 10.30074/FJMH.200409_17(3).0002
吳珮貞（2004）。諮商歷程研究方法。諮商與輔導，209，2-5。doi: 10.29837/CG.200305.0002
林子軒（2011）。非自願性成員在團體中之抗拒行為－一個性侵害加害人刑後強制治療團體的觀察。中華團體心理治療，23（1），29-44。
林美珠與王麗斐（1998）。團體治療性與反治療性重要事件之分析。中華輔導學報，6，35-59。
林明傑（2011）。家庭暴力危險分級方案之成效再研究：一個犯罪防治分類分級整合模式的提出。犯罪學期刊，14（2），139-182。doi: 10.29607/ZHWHGX.201112.0004
林明傑與沈勝昂（2004）。婚姻暴力加害人分類之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，17（2），87-113。doi: 10.30074/FJMH.200406_17(2).0003
林明傑與黃志中（2003）。他們怎麼了？家庭暴力加害者的評估與輔導。嘉義：濤石文化。
林武雄（1996）。輔導中抗拒行為之處理。社區發展季刊，76，143-157。
卓紋君與黃創華（2004）。薩提爾模式家庭探源團體療效研究－參與者觀點的分析。中華心理衛生學刊，16（3），31-59。doi: 10.30074/FJMH.200309_16(3).0002
周玉真（2007）。焦點解決親職團體之團體效果與療效因素分析。教育心理學報，39（1），1-21。doi: 10.6251/BEP.20070123
周煌智（主編）（2016）。家庭暴力與性侵害加害人處遇業務－行政人員實務手冊。台北市：衛福部。
邱美華與謝麗紅（2009）。焦點解決團體諮商領導者意圖與成員知覺一致性分析。中華輔導與諮商學報，25，1-38。doi: 10.7082/CJGC.200903.0001
邱慧輝（2007）。面對非自願案主的態度、哲學信念與專業倫理。九十六年度「為反兒少性交犯罪行為人輔導教育」工作人員培訓：內政部兒童局。
邱獻輝（2010）。從關係主義文化變遷觀點建構男性親密暴力者的分類架構。中華輔導與諮商學報，46，93–126。
陳怡青、李維庭、張紀薇與李美珍（2012）。婚姻暴力加害人處遇成效評估研究之初探。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，8（2），17-53。doi: 10.29804/AJDVSO.201212.0002
陳伯偉、唐文慧與王宏仁（2014）。男性家暴者的諮商經驗：階級差異如何再製。臺灣社會學刊，227 – 273。
張芳榮、李娟娟、謝宏林、王梅麗、張達人（2005）。家庭暴力加害人非自願性團體治療之團體歷程探討。中華團體治療，11（2），1-13。
鈕文英（2015）。研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉。
黃志中（2002）。現實治療取向之家庭暴力加害人認知教育輔導團體。中華團體心理治療，8（2），2-8。doi: 10.30060/CGP.200212.0001
賈紅鶯（2011）。家族治療的文化脈絡與靈性議題：家暴的困境、轉變與反思。中華輔導與諮商學報，30，124–149。doi: 10.7082/CJGC.201108.0124
劉志如與劉彥君（2004）。大學生對認知治療團體之重要事件知覺分析初探。輔導與諮商學報，36（1），1-21。
衛生福利部（2018，9月10日）․衛生福利公務統計。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-3664-113.html
鄭青玫（2010）。男性婚暴加害人處遇團體療效因素變化歷程之初探研究。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，6（1），239-252。doi: 10.29804/AJDVSO.201007.0011
鄭青玫、蕭文與黃瑛琪（2014）。男性婚暴者參與開放式處遇團體之反療效因素變化歷程初探。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，27，81-135。doi: 10.6308/JCPRC.27.04
蔡麗芳（2002）。人際歷程回憶在諮商歷程研究中的運用。諮商與輔導，130，30-32。
蘇昭月、陳筱萍、周煌智、吳慈恩與黃志中（2005）。運用敘說研究探索家庭暴力施暴者的成長歷程與婚姻經驗。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1（1），1-26。doi: 10.29804/AJDVSO.200512.0001
程小蘋、黃慧涵、劉安真與梁淑娟（譯）（2013）。團體諮商─策略與技巧（原作者：E. E Jacobs, R. L Harvill, & R. L. Masson）。台北市：五南圖書。（原著出版年：2009）。
曾睿憓（譯）（2014）。是你選擇了憂鬱（原作者：W .Glasser）。台北市：商業周刊出版。（原著出版年：2010）。
劉淑慧、田秀蘭（譯）（2009）。諮商研究法（原作者：P. P. Heppner, B. E. Wampold, & D. M. Kivlighan）。台北市：學富（原著出版年：2008）。

二、英文文獻

Anderson, W. P., & Niles, S. G. (2000). Important events in career counseling: Client and counselor descriptions. The Career Development Quarterly, 48(3), 251-263. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2000.tb00290.x
Archer, J. (2013). Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence? Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 403-440. doi: 10.1037/a0029114
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychological Review, 23, 1023-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.001
Bancroft, L. (2007). Assessing and monitoring programs for men who abuse women. Retrieved from http://www.lundybancroft.com/pages/art icles_sub/monitoring_batterers.htm
Covell, C. N., Huss, M. T., ＆ Langhingchsen-Rohling, J. (2007). Empathic Deficits Among Male Batters: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 165-174. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9066-2
Cummings, L. A., Martin, J., Hallberg, E., & Slenon, A. (1992). Memory for therapeutic events, sessions effectiveness, and working alliance in short-term counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 306-312. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.39.3.306
Cummings, L. A., Siemon, A., & Hallberg, H. (1993). Sessions evaluation and recall of important events as a function of counselor experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 156-165. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.40.2.156
Dammen, T., Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (2015). An open trial of group metacognitive therapy for depression in Norway. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69(2), 126-131. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2014.936502
Doxsee, D. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1994). Hindering events in interpersonal relations groups for counselor trainees. Journal of Counseling & Development, 72, 621– 626. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb01692.x
Dutton, D. G. (2007). Thinking outside the box: Gender and court-mandated therapy. In J. Hamel & T. L. Nicholls (Eds.), Family interventions in domestic violence: A Handbook of Gender-Inclusive Theory and Treatment (pp.27-58). New York, NY: Springe. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000522012.13644.df
Eckhardt, C. I., Babcock, J., & Homack, S. (2004). Partner assaultive men and the stages and process of change. Journal of Family Violence, 19(2), 81–93. doi: 10.1023/B:JOFV.0000019839.98858.5c
Eckhardt, C., Murphy, C., Black, D., & Suhr, L. (2006). Intervention programs for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: conclusions from a clinical research perspective. Public Health Reports, 121, 369–381. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100405
Elliott, R. (1979). How clients perceive helper behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26, 285-294. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.26.4.285
Elliot, R. (1983). That in your hands: A comprehensive process analysis of a significant event in psychotherapy. Psychiatry Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 46(2), 113-29. doi: 10.1521/00332747.1983.11024185
Elliot, R. (1985). Helpful and unhelpful events in brief counseling interviews: An empirical taxonomy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 307-322. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.32.3.307
Elliott, R., & Shapiro, D. A. (1988). Brief Structured Recall: A more efficient method for studying significant therapy events. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61, 141-153. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1988.tb02773.x
Fitzpatrick, M., Peternelli, L., Stalikas, A., & Iwakabe, S. (1999). Client emotional involvement and occurrence of in-session therapeutic phenomena. Canadian Journal of Counselling, 33(3), 179-194.
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327-357. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_123
Grafanaki, S., & Mcleod, J. (1999). Experiential congruence: Qualitative analysis of client and counselor narrative accounts of significant events in timelimlted person-centred therapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 2(1), 20-32.
Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-9. doi: 10.1080/14733140212331384958
Haynes, P., Kelly, M., Warner, L., Quan, S., Krakow, B., & Bootzin, R. (2016). Cognitive Behavioral Social Rhythm Group Therapy for Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and sleep disturbance: Results from an open trial. Journal of Affective Disorders, 192, 234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.012
Heppner, P. P., Rosenberg, I. J., & Hedgespeth, J. (1992). Three methods in measuring the therapeutic process: clients’ and counselors’ constructions of the therapeutic process versus actual therapeutic events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 20-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-0167.39.1.20
Hettrich, E. L. & O’Leary, K. D. (2007). Females’ reasons for their physical aggression in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22, 1131-1143. doi: 10.1177/0886260507303729
Hill, C. E. & Corbett. M.M. (1993). A perspective on the history of process and outcome research in Counseling Psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 3-24. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.40.1.3
Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38(2), 139-149.
Huber, D. M., Saur, E. M., Mrdjenovich, A. J., & Gugui, P. C. (2010). Contributions to advisory working alliance: Advisee attachment orientation and pairing methods. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(4), 244-253. doi: 10.1037/a0019213
Johnson, M., E. (2014). A home with dignity: Domestic violence and property rights. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1, 1-54. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2332089
Johnson, M., E. (2015). Asylum Law -- Membership in a particular social group -- Board of immigration appeals holds that guatemalan woman fleeing domestic violence meets threshold asylum requirement. Harvard Law Review, 128 (7), p2090-2097.
Kivlighan, Jr. D., & Arthur, E. G. (2000). Convergence in client and counselor recall of important session events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(3), 267-276. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.79
Mahrer, A. R. (1988) Discovery – oriented psychotherapy research: rationale, aims, and methods. American Psychologist, 43, 267-276.
Mahrer, A. R., Gagnon, R., Fairweather, D. R., & Cote, P. (1992). How to determine a session is a very good one. Journal Intergrative and Eclectic Psychology, 11(1), 9-23. doi: 10.1037/10109-017
Mahrer, A. R., Lawson, K. C., & Stalikas, A. (1990). Relationships between strength of feeling, type of therapy, and occurrence of in-session good moments. Psychotherapy, 27(4), 531-541. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.27.4.531
Marmar, C. R. (1990). Psychotherapy process research: Progress, dilemmas, and future directions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 251-260.
Martin, J., Martin, W., & Slemon, G. A. (1987). Good moments mediation in person-centered and rational-emotive therapy. Journal of Conselting Psychology, 34,251-260.
Martin, J. & Stelmaczonek, K. (1988). Participants’ identification and recall of important events in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35(4), 385-390. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.58.3.265
Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational researcher, 33(2), 2-11. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033002003
McLeod, J. (l996). The emerging narrative approach to counseling and psychotherapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24, 173-184. doi: 10.1300/J035v13n01_05
Orlinsky, D. E., Ronnestad, M. H., & Willutzki, U. (2004). Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (5th ed., pp. 307-389). NY: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-69499-2_57
Paulson, B. L., Truscott, D., & Stuart, J. (1999). Clients’ perceptions of helpful experience in counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 317-324. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.46.3.317
Roback, H. B. (2000). Adverse outcome in group psychotherapy: Risk factors, prevention, and research directions. Journal of psychotherapy practice and research, 9(1), 113-122.
Ross, S., Healey, L., Diemer, K., & Humphreys, C. (2016). Providing an integrated response to family violence: Governance attributes of local networks in victoria : Providing an integrated response. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(2), 127-136. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12162
Shaughnessy, Z., ＆ Perl-Dekel, O. (2000). A comparison of therapeutic factors in two group treatment modalities: verbal and art therapy. Journal of Specialists in Group Work, 25, 288-304. doi: 10.1080/01933920008411468
Schmidt, M. C., Kolodinsky, J. M., Carsten, G., Schmidt, F. E., Larson, M., & MacLaclan, C. (2007). Short term change in attitude and motivating factors to change abusive behavior of male batterers after participating in a group intervention program based on the pro-feminist and cognitive-behavioral approach. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10896-007-9064-4
Schrock, D. & Irene, P. (2007). Negotiating negemonic masculinity in a batter intervention program. Gender and Society, 21, 625-49. doi: 10.1177/0891243207304975
Slabu, E. (2014). Family violence -- Theoretical and practical aspects. Public Administration & Regional Studies, 13(1), 49-60.
Stalikas, A., De-Stefano, D. S., ＆ Bernardelli, A. (1997). Client process in short term dynamic psychotherapy. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 10(1), 29-38. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.44.2.121
Stalikas, A., & Fitzpatrick, M. (1995). Client good moment: An intensive analysis of single session. Canadian Journal of counseling, 29(2), 160-175.
Straus, M. A. (2009). Gender symmetry in partner violence: evidence and implications for prevention and treatment. In Whitaker, D. J. & Lutzker, J. R. (Ed.), Prevention of partner violence: Research and evidence-based intervention strategies (pp.245-271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11873-011
Taft, C. T. ＆ Murphy, C. M. (2007). The working alliance in intervention for partner violence perpetrators: recent and theory. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 11–18. doi: 10.1007/s10896-006-9053-z
Walsh, R., Perrucci, A., & Severns, J. (1999). What’s in a good moment: A germeneutic study of psychotherapy values across levels of psychotherapy training. Psychotherapy Research, 9(3), 304-426. doi: 10.1093/ptr/9.3.304
Watson, J. C., ＆ Rennie, D. L. (1994). Qualitative analysis of client’ subjective experience of significant moments during the exploration of problematic reations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 500-509. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.41.4.500
Wilcox-Matthew, L., Ottens, A., & Minor, C. W. (1997). An analysis of significant events in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75(4), 282-292. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1997.tb02343.x
Yalom, I. D. (2005). Theory and practice of group psychotherapy(5th ed.). New York: Basic Books Inc.
Young, C., Cook, P., Smith, S., Turteltaub, J., & Hazelwood, L. (2007). Domestic violence: New visions, New solutions. In family interventions in domestic violence. A Handbook of Gender-Inclusive Theory and Treatment (pp.601-620). Springer Publishing Company, LLC.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	諮商心理師帶領家暴相對人團體之經驗分析

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫