:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:城市公共開放空間品質系統改善之混合多屬性決策模型
作者:朱柏葳
作者(外文):ZHU, BO-WEI
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:都市計劃研究所
指導教授:曾國雄
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2019
主題關鍵詞:城市公共開放空間品質系統改善策略多屬性決策模型Public open spacequalitysystematic improvement strategiescaption evaluation methodD-DANP-mV model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
城市人口日益快速增長和高速城市化進程給現有的城市公共開放空間帶來了巨大的挑戰。近年來,大量的研究致力於建立一個更好的證據基礎,以證明高質量的城市公共開放空間的益處及對整個社會的經濟、環境和社會價值。隨著這些證據的挖掘,城市公共開放空間被認為是有能力對都市地區的一些關鍵議程作出積極貢獻,這些議題包括公共衛生、社會包容、都市行銷、都市更新等。值得注意的是,在這些議題發展的基礎上出現了一些關於品質提升的新議題。例如,如何合理分配資源以提高城市公共開放空間的品質,或者在「綠色仕紳化」議題中的關於「僅綠就好(just green enough)」的主張,建議城市公共開放空間品質應該得到分期漸進的、系統的改善。
在城市公共開放空間系統改善的訴求下,本研究檢視了目前制定改善策略不同階段所常用的方法,發現幾個問題。第一,鮮有人討論在建立評價框架時要採用何種數據來源(原始來源數據或者次級來源數據)通常有什麼樣的判別機制;第二,在利用原始數據建立評價框架的階段,一些常用的評價方法往往存在一些局限性,如回憶偏差、社會期望偏差或研究者解釋偏差等;第三,在準則權重訓練階段,常用的方法都是建立在準則是彼此獨立的假設基礎上,這樣的假設可能不大符合真實世界的實際情況,即問題所涉及的準則之間往往存在著相互影響關係。從系統改善的角度看,這些方法可能面臨着一些挑戰,即最終確定的改善優序是否是影響根源項,而這將影響資源分配的有效性。因此,面對以上問題,本文的研究目的是在釐清評價框架建立問題中的數據源選擇機制的基礎上,提出一種將字幕評估法(CEM)與多屬性決策模型(即D-DANP-mV 模型)相結合的混合決策模型,以期為城市公共開放空間品質提升制定系統改善策略提供有效的工具。
本文澳門本島的城市公共開放空間進行了實證研究,以展示新的混合模型的優越性。第一,使用CEM在一系列需要以旅客吸引為目標進行品質改善的城市公共開放空間中展開了數據搜集工作,獲得了一個用戶偏好資料庫,它包含1790張圖片數據以及每張照片上附有的文字評價數據。第二,用於辨認準則間影響關係和訓練影響權重的DEMATELL資料庫,是通過9位專家的價值判斷資料的收集建立的。第三,用於計算績效表現上的間隙值的VIKOR資料庫是由從36個用戶志願者那裏搜集到的回饋數據而建立的。通過對第一個數據集中數據的分析,建立了一個包含14個準則的評估框架;通過對第二個數據集數據的分析,確定了評價標準的影響網路關係圖(INRM)和影響權重;通過對第三個數據集數據的分析,得到了每個準則的間隙值和案例整體的間隙值。綜合考量這三部分的分析結果,進而可以建立城市開放空間品質改善的策略。結果表明,新建框架中的新標準與從之前從次級源數據中建立的初始框架中的準則有些許不同,而新建立的評價框架更適用於在旅客吸引目標下的澳門城市公共開放空間改善狀況。研究結果還表明,使用新模型的得出改善優序與在其他「頭痛醫頭」思路指導下獲得的改善優序是有差別的,而新模型可以為城市公共開放空間品質總體系統改善提供更有建設性和前瞻性的資源分配和利用的方法。
本研究為決策者提供了一種綜合、實用的方法模型,用於城市公共開放空間品質系統地微觀干預,其優越性是運用該模型從整體上找到準則改善優序以及各準則改善上的影響關係,從而在合理配置資源的前提下,為城市公共開放空間品質的改善制定系統的、適合在地的改進策略。
The rapid urbanization and burgeoning populations have created enormous challenges to existing urban public open spaces (POSs). In recent years, a great deal of research has been devoted to establishing an improved evidence base on the benefits of good quality POS and its economic, environmental and social value to society. Through such evidence, POS was recognized as having the ability to contribute positively to some of the key agendas in urban areas including health, social inclusion, city marketing, urban renewal, and so on. Notably, there are some new issues, such as the rational allocation of resources for improving POS quality in the POS place-keeping issues, or the opinion of ‘just green enough’ in the environmental justice issue, which emphasize that POS quality should be improved systematically.
Under the demand of making systematic strategies for improving POS quality, this study has examined the methods commonly used at different stages of making improvement strategies and discovered several research problems. First, at the stage of building an evaluation framework, determining which consideration factors would affect the decision on what kind of data (secondary source data and/or primary source data) should be adopted for building an evaluation framework is rarely discussed. Second, at the stage of using primary source data to build an evaluation framework, some commonly used methods often suffer from a number of limitations, such as the recall bias, social desirability bias or researcher interpretation bias. Third, at the stage of training the weights of criteria, the commonly used methods all operate on the assumption that the criteria are independent, which may not fit the current real-world situation where there are often interrelations among the involved attributes. In light of systematic improvement, these methods may face a challenge in determining whether the priorities found are finally the crucial improvement ones at the root of the impact, which is important in regard to the rational allocation of resources. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is that, based on clarifying the mechanism of data source selection for building an evaluation framework, proposing a novel hybrid model that combines caption evaluation method (CEM) and the D-DANP-mV model (DEMATEL-DANP-modified VIKOR) for making systematic improvement strategies of POS quality.
An empirical study in Macao peninsula is presented in order to illustrate the superiority of the new hybrid model. A user-preference database containing 1790 photographs with logs was obtained by employing CEM in a series of POSs which need to be improved for tourist attraction. The DEMATEL database for calculating correlation and influential weights of criteria was generated by systematically collecting value judgments by 9 experts. Then a VIKOR database for calculating the performance-gap was obtained from 36 user-volunteers’ responses. An evaluation framework with 14 criteria was established through the analysis of the first database, and the influential network relation map (INRM) and influential weights of the criteria were identified from the analysis of the second and third databases; the performance-gap value in each criterion and also the total gap value were thereby obtained. According to these three parts of the results, the improvement strategies of POS quality could be established. The findings show that the determined evaluation framework is more applicable to the local situation under the goal of tourist attraction, and the new criteria differ to some extent from those in the initial framework which was obtained from secondary sources data. The findings also show that the results of the new model differ from those obtained by using ‘stop-gap piecemeal’ methods. It implies that the new model can provide a more constructive and proactive allocation and utilization of resources for overall improvement.
This study may provide decision makers with an integrated and practical way to establish priorities and influential relationships of micro-scale interventions of POS quality in a holistic manner, in order to make systematic improvement strategies for POS quality improvement under the rational allocation of resources.
Ahern, J. (1991). Planning for an extensive open space system: linking landscape structure and function. Landscape and urban planning, 21(1-2), 131-145.
Akmar, A. N., Konijnendijk, C. C., Sreetheran, M., & Nilsson, K. (2011). Greenspace planning and management in Klang valley, Peninsular Malaysia. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 37(3), 99-107.
Almanza, E., Jerrett, M., Dunton, G., Seto, E., & Pentz, M. A. (2012). A study of community design, greenness, and physical activity in children using satellite, GPS and accelerometer data. Health & place, 18(1), 46-54.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.
Aspinall, P. A., Thompson, C. W., Alves, S., Sugiyama, T., Brice, R., & Vickers, A. (2010). Preference and relative importance for environmental attributes of neighbourhood open space in older people. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(6), 1022-1039.
Austin, M. E. (2004). Resident perspectives of the open space conservation subdivision in Hamburg Township, Michigan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2-3), 245-253.
Balomenou, N., & Garrod, B. (2014). Using volunteer-employed photography to inform tourism planning decisions: A study of St David's Peninsula, Wales. Tourism Management, 44, 126-139.
Balomenou, N., & Garrod, B. (2016). A review of participant-generated image methods in the social sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 335-351.
Balomenou, N., Garrod, B., & Georgiadou, A. (2017). Making sense of tourists' photographs using canonical variate analysis. Tourism Management, 61, 173-179.
Balram, S., & Dragićević, S. (2005). Attitudes toward urban green spaces: integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landscape and urban planning, 71(2-4), 147-162.
Banerjee, T. (2001). The future of public space: beyond invented streets and reinvented places. Journal of the American planning association, 67(1), 9-24.
Bastian, O., Haase, D., & Grunewald, K. (2012). Ecosystem properties, potentials and services − The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example. Ecological Indicators, 21, 7–16.
Beck, H. (2009). Linking the quality of public spaces to quality of life. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(3), 240-248.
Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. American journal of preventive medicine, 28(2), 159-168.
Bird, M. E., Datta, G. D., Van Hulst, A., Kestens, Y., & Barnett, T. A. (2015). A reliability assessment of a direct-observation park evaluation tool: the Parks, activity and recreation among kids (PARK) tool. BMC public health, 15(1), 906.
Britain, G. (2002). Assessing Needs and Opportunities: A Companion Guide to PPG17. Commission for Health Improvement. Great Britain. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7660/156780.pdf
Booth, M. L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Clavisi, O., & Leslie, E. (2000). Social–cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. Preventive medicine, 31(1), 15-22.
Boulton, C., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., & Byrne, J. (2018). Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature. Landscape and Urban Planning, 178, 82-101.
Brownson, R. C., Boehmer, T. K., & Luke, D. A. (2005). Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors?. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 26, 421-443.
Brownson, R. C., Hoehner, C. M., Day, K., Forsyth, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2009). Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. American journal of preventive medicine, 36(4), S99-S123.
Brueckner, J. K., & Fansler, D. A. (1983). The economics of urban sprawl: Theory and evidence on the spatial sizes of cities. The review of Economics and Statistics, 479-482.
Bullock, C. H. (2008). Valuing urban green space: hypothetical alternatives and the status quo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(1), 15-35.
CABE (2005). Decent Parks? Decent Behaviour? The Link between the Quality of Parks and User Behaviour. London: CABE. Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118142349/http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/decent-parks-decent-behaviour.pdf
CABE & Mayor of London (2008). Open Space Strategies: Best Practice Guidance.
CABE. (2010). Urban green nation: Building the evidence base. London: CABE. Available online: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/urban-green-nation_0_0.pdf
CABE Space, (2004). Raising the Standard: The Green Flag Award Guidance Manual. London: CABE.
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary public space, part two: classification. Journal of urban design, 15(2), 157-173.
Carmona, M (2019). Principles for public space design, planning to do better. URBAN DESIGN International, 1-13.
Carmona, M., De Magalhaes, C., Blum, R., Hopkins, J., 2004. Is the Grass Greener. . .? Learning From International Innovations in Urban Green Space Management. CABE Space, London. Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118111326/http://www.cabe.org.uk/files/is-the-grass-greener-full.pdf
Carmona, M., De Magalhaes, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: the management dimension. Routledge.
Carpenter, J. (2006). Addressing Europe's urban challenges: lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative. Urban Studies, 43(12), 2145-2162.
Carr, S., Stephen, C., Francis, M., Rivlin, L. G., & Stone, A. M. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.
Chapin, T. S. (2012). Introduction: from growth controls, to comprehensive planning, to smart growth: planning's emerging fourth wave. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(1), 5-15.
Chen, Z., & Ye, M. (2009). Western theories on urban public space: an exploration for a comprehensive definition [J]. City Planning Review, 6.
Chen, Y., Liu, T., & Liu, W. (2016). Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: A case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53, 66-77.
Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban planning, 68(1), 129-138.
Chuang, Y. C., Hu, S. K., Liou, J. J., & Lo, H. W. (2018). Building a Decision Dashboard for Improving Green Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 17(05), 1363-1398.
City of Vienna, (2014). STEP 2025: The thematic concept “Green and Open Spaces”. Fachkonzept MOBILITÄT. Available online: https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008440.pdf
Clifton, K. J., Smith, A. D. L., & Rodriguez, D. (2007). The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(1-2), 95-110.
Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & McKenzie, T. L. (2010). Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others?. Preventive medicine, 50, S9-S12.
Conway, H. (1991). People's parks: the design and development of Victorian parks in Britain. Cambridge University Press.
Conway, H. (2000). Parks and people: the social functions. The regeneration of public parks, 9-20.
Coombes, E., Jones, A. P., & Hillsdon, M. (2010). The relationship of physical activity and overweight to objectively measured green space accessibility and use. Social science & medicine, 70(6), 816-822.
Cooper Marcus,C.,Francis,C.(Eds.),1998.People Places: Design Guidelines for Urban Open Space, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Toronto.
Cranz, G. (1982). The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America. The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America.
Cuthbert, A. R. (1995). The right to the city: surveillance, private interest and the public domain in Hong Kong. Cities, 12(5), 293-310.
Dadvand, P., Bartoll, X., Basagaña, X., Dalmau-Bueno, A., Martinez, D., Ambros, A., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2016). Green spaces and general health: roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment international, 91, 161-167.
Daniels, T., & Lapping, M. (2005). Land preservation: An essential ingredient in smart growth. Journal of planning literature, 19(3), 316-329.
Davis, S. G. (1986). Parades and power: Street theatre in nineteenth-century Philadelphia. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
DCLG, (2006) . Assessing Needs and Opportunities: A Companion Guide to PPG17. Department for Communities and Local Government, London, UK. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/assessing-needs-and-opportunities-a-companion-guide-to-planning-policy-guidance-17
De la Barrera, F., Reyes-Paecke, S., & Banzhaf, E. (2016). Indicators for green spaces in contrasting urban settings. Ecological Indicators, 62, 212-219.
De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and planning A, 35(10), 1717-1731.
Dempsey, N., & Burton, M. (2012). Defining place-keeping: The long-term management of public spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(1), 11-20.
Development Bureau of Hong Kong, 2011. Public Open Space in Private Developments Design and Management Guidelines. Hong Kong. Available online: https://www.devb.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_582/Guidelines_English.pdf
Doick, K. J., Atkinson, G. E., Cordle, P., & Giupponi, N. (2013). Investigating design and provision of access facilities as a barrier to woodland use. Urban forestry & urban greening, 12(1), 117-125.
Dorwart, C. E., Moore, R. L., & Leung, Y. F. (2009). Visitors' perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: A model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leisure Sciences, 32(1), 33-54.
Doxiadis, T., & Liveri, D. (2013). Symbiosis: integrating tourism and Mediterranean landscapes. Journal of Place Management and Development, 6(3), 240-255.
Dunnett, N., Swanwick, C., & Woolley, H. (2002). Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces. London: Department for transport, local government and the regions. Available online: http://publiekeruimte.info/Data/Documents/e842aqrm/53/Improving-Urban-Parks.pdf
Edwards, N., Hooper, P., Knuiman, M., Foster, S., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Associations between park features and adolescent park use for physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 21.
Edwards, N., Hooper, P., Trapp, G. S., Bull, F., Boruff, B., & Giles-Corti, B. (2013). Development of a public open space desktop auditing tool (POSDAT): a remote sensing approach. Applied Geography, 38, 22-30.
Efroymson, D., Ha, T. T. K. T., & Ha, P. T. (2009). Public spaces: How they humanize cities. Dhaka, Bangladish: HealthBridge-WBB Trust. Available online: https://healthbridge.ca/images/uploads/library/Public_Spaces_How_they_Humanize_Cities.pdf
Ekkel, E. D., & de Vries, S. (2017). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and urban planning, 157, 214-220.
Ewing, R., & Handy, S. (2009). Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Urban design, 14(1), 65-84.
Foster, C., Hillsdon, M., Jones, A., & Panter, J. (2006). Assessing the relationship between the quality of the urban green space and physical activity. London: CABE.
Fors, H., Molin, J. F., Murphy, M. A., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015). User participation in urban green spaces–for the people or the parks?. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 722-734.
Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012a). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401-409.
Francis, J., Wood, L. J., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2012b). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between Public Open Space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social science & medicine, 74(10), 1570-1577.
Francis, M. (2003). Urban open space: Designing for user needs. Island Press.
Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1451-1456.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology letters, 3(4), 390-394.
Fung, C. K., & Jim, C. Y. (2015). Unraveling Hong Kong Geopark experience with visitor-employed photography method. Applied Geography, 62, 301-313.
Garrod, B. (2007). A snapshot into the past: The utility of volunteer-employed photography in planning and managing heritage tourism. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 2(1), 14-35.
Garrod, B. (2008). Exploring place perception a photo-based analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2), 381-401.
Gehl, J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space. Island press.
Gidlow, C. J., Ellis, N. J., & Bostock, S. (2012). Development of the neighbourhood green space tool (NGST). Landscape and Urban Planning, 106(4), 347-358.
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M., & Knuiman, M. (2005). Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 169-176
Girling, C. L., & Helphand, K. I. (1997). Retrofitting suburbia. Open space in Bellevue, Washington, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 36(4), 301-313.
Godbey, G. (2009). Outdoor recreation, health, and wellness: Understanding and Enhancing the Relationship. Washington: Outdoor Resources Review Group. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1408694
Gold, S. (1972). Nonuse of neighborhood parks. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 38(6), 369-378.
Gölcük, İ., & Baykasoğlu, A. (2016). An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP. Expert Systems with Applications, 46, 346-366.
Goličnik, B., & Thompson, C. W. (2010). Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces. Landscape and urban planning, 94(1), 38-53.
Gospodini, A. (2001). Urban design, urban space morphology, urban tourism: an emerging new paradigm concerning their relationship. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 925-934.
Greenspace Scotland, 2008. Greenspace Quality: A Guide to Assessment, Planning and Strategic Development. Greenspace Scotland, Stirling. Available online: http://www.ukmaburbanforum.co.uk/docunents/other/qualityguide.pdf
Greenwood, V. A., & Dwyer, L. (2017). Reinventing Macau tourism: gambling on creativity? Current Issues in Tourism, 20(6), 580-602.
Grow, H. M., Saelens, B. E., Kerr, J., Durant, N. H., Norman, G. J., & Sallis, J. F. (2008). Where are youth active? Roles of proximity, active transport, and built environment. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 40(12), 2071-2079.
Hammer, S., Kamal-Chaoui, L., Robert, A., & Plouin, M. (2011). Cities and green growth: a conceptual framework. 2011/08. Paris: OECD.
Han, B., Cohen, D. A., Derose, K. P., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., & Raaen, L. (2014). How much neighborhood parks contribute to local residents' physical activity in the City of Los Angeles: A meta-analysis. Preventive medicine, 69, S106-S110.
Hancock, H. K. (1973). Recreation preference: its relation to user behavior. Journal of Forestry, 71(6), 336-337.
Heyman, E. (2012). Analysing recreational values and management effects in an urban forest with the visitor-employed photography method. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(3), 267-277.
Hong Kong Planning Department (2018). Chapter 4: Recreation, open space and greening. Available online (04/04/2019): https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/tech_doc/hkpsg/full/pdf/ch4.pdf
Hooper, P., Elands, B., Peters, K., de Vries, S., van den Bosch, M., & Thompson, C. W. (2018). Public health impact of nature contact—pathways to health promotion and disease prevention. Oxford Textbook of Nature and Public Health: The Role of Nature in Improving the Health of a Population, 95.
Hu, S. K., Lu, M. T., & Tzeng, G. H. (2014). Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4401-4413.
Huang, K. W., Huang, J. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2016). New hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for improving competence sets: Enhancing a company’s core competitiveness. Sustainability, 8(2), 175.
Huang, C. H., Tsaur, J. R., & Yang, C. H. (2012). Does world heritage list really induce more tourists? Evidence from Macau. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1450-1457.
Hummon, D. M. (1991). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. By Ray Oldenburg (Book Review). Social Forces, 69(3), 931.
Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social studies of science, 36(2), 299-320.
Jacobs, J. (1989). The death and life of great American cities. 1961. New York: Vintage.
Jansen-Verbeke, M. C. (1988). Leisure, recreation and tourism in inner cities: explorative case-studies. Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit, Interfaculteit der Geografie en Prehistorie, Geografisch en Planologisch Instituut.
Jansson, M., & Persson, B. (2010). Playground planning and management: an evaluation of standard-influenced provision through user needs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(1), 33-42.
Kaczynski, A. T., Besenyi, G. M., Stanis, S. A. W., Koohsari, M. J., Oestman, K. B., Bergstrom, R., ... & Reis, R. S. (2014). Are park proximity and park features related to park use and park-based physical activity among adults? Variations by multiple socio-demographic characteristics. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 146.
Kaczynski, A. T., & Havitz, M. E. (2009). Examining the Relationship between Proximal Park Features and Residents' Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 27(3).
Kaczynski, A. T., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Environmental correlates of physical activity: a review of evidence about parks and recreation. Leisure sciences, 29(4), 315-354.
Kaczynski, A. T., Potwarka, L. R., & Saelens, B. E. (2008). Association of park size, distance, and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American journal of public health, 98(8), 1451-1456.
Kaczynski, A. T., Stanis, S. A. W., Besenyi, G. M., & Child, S. (2013). Peer Reviewed: Differences in Youth and Adult Physical Activity in Park Settings by Sex and Race/Ethnicity. Preventing chronic disease, 10.
Karuppannan, S., & Sivam, A. (2013). Comparative analysis of utilisation of open space at neighbourhood level in three Asian cities: Singapore, Delhi and Kuala Lumpur. Urban Design International, 18(2), 145-164.
Kayden, J. S. (2000). Privately owned public space: the New York City experience. John Wiley & Sons.
Kellet, J., & Rofe, M. (2009). Creating active communities: How can open and public spaces in urban and suburban environments support active living. University of South Australia: Adelaide, Australia.
Kemperman, A., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Green spaces in the direct living environment and social contacts of the aging population. Landscape and Urban Planning, 129, 44-54.
Kendal, D., Lee, K., Ramalho, C., Bowen, K., & Bush, J. (2016). Benefits of urban green space in the Australian context. Available online: https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/122914/2016-CAUL-Benefits%20of%20Urban%20Green%20Space.pdf?sequence=1
Klenosky, D. B. (2002). The “pull” of tourism destinations: A means-end investigation. Journal of travel research, 40(4), 396-403.
Koga, T., Taka, A., Munakata, J., Kojima, T., Hirate, K., & Yasuoka, M. (1999). Participatory research of townscape, using “caption evaluation method”. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 517, 79-84.
Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., Giles-Corti, B., & Karakiewicz, J. A. (2013). Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough? Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 92-99.
Koohsari, M. J., Mavoa, S., Villanueva, K., Sugiyama, T., Badland, H., Kaczynski, A. T., ... & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health & Place, 33, 75-82.
Krekel, C., Kolbe, J., & Wüstemann, H. (2016). The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics, 121, 117-127.
Kuo, F.E.; Sullivan, W.C.; Coley, R.L.; Brunson, L. Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. Am. J. Commun. Psychol.1998, 26, 823–851.
Lachowycz, K., & Jones, A. P. (2011). Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. Obesity reviews, 12(5), e183-e189.
Lachowycz, K., & Jones, A. P. (2013). Towards a better understanding of the relationship between greenspace and health: development of a theoretical framework. Landscape and Urban Planning, 118, 62-69.
Land, Public Works and Transport Bureau of the Macao. (2010). Integrated Urban Design for Macao. Available online: https://urbanplanning.dssopt.gov.mo/cn/download/Estudo02.pdf
Lange, A., Giles-Corti, B., & Broomhall, M. (2004). Quality of Public Open Space Tool (POST): observers’ manual. Perth, Western Australia: School of Population Health, University of Western Australia. Available online: http://www.sph.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/411951/POST_Manual.pdf
Lebel, L., Krittasudthacheewa, C., Salamanca, A., & Sriyasak, P. (2012). Lifestyles and consumption in cities and the links with health and well-being: the case of obesity. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 4(4), 405-413.
Lee, A. C., & Maheswaran, R. (2011). The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. Journal of public health, 33(2), 212-222.
Lee, A. C. K., Jordan, H. C., & Horsley, J. (2015). Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning. Risk management and healthcare policy, 8, 131-137.
Lee, J., Davidson, J. W., & Krause, A. E. (2016). Older people’s motivations for participating in community singing in Australia. International Journal of Community Music, 9(2), 191-206.
and spontaneity.
Lee, Y., Gu, N., & An, S. (2017). Residents' perception and use of green space: Results from a mixed method study in a deprived neighbourhood in Korea. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(6), 855-871.
Lindholst, A. C., Sullivan, S. G., van den Bosch, C. C. K., & Fors, H. (2015). The inherent politics of managing the quality of urban green spaces. Planning Practice & Research, 30(4), 376-392.
Lindholst, A. C., van den Bosch, C. C. K., Kjøller, C. P., Sullivan, S., Kristoffersson, A., Fors, H., & Nilsson, K. (2016). Urban green space qualities reframed toward a public value management paradigm: The case of the Nordic Green Space Award. Urban forestry & urban greening, 17, 166-176.
Liou, J. J., & Chuang, Y. T. (2010). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3755-3761.
Liou, J. J., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). Comments on “Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview”. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(4), 672-695.
Liu, C. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Lee, M. H. (2012). Improving tourism policy implementation–The use of hybrid MCDM models. Tourism Management, 33(2), 413-426.
Liu, C. H., Tzeng, G. H., Lee, M. H., & Lee, P. Y. (2013). Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 95-107.
Lo, A. Y., & Jim, C. Y. (2012). Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land use policy, 29(3), 577-586.
Loeffler, T. A. (2004). A photo elicitation study of the meanings of outdoor adventure experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(4), 536-556.
Lopes, M. N., & Camanho, A. S. (2013). Public green space use and consequences on urban vitality: An assessment of European cities. Social indicators research, 113(3), 751-767.
Lloyd, K., & Auld, C. (2003). Leisure, public space and quality of life in the urban environment. Urban policy and research, 21(4), 339-356.
Lu, M. T., Lin, S. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2013). Improving RFID adoption in Taiwan's healthcare industry based on a DEMATEL technique with a hybrid MCDM model. Decision Support Systems, 56, 259-269.
Lu, M. T., Tzeng, G. H., Cheng, H., & Hsu, C. C. (2015). Exploring mobile banking services for user behavior in intention adoption: using new hybrid MADM model. Service business, 9(3), 541-565.
Lynch, K. (1995). City sense and city design: writings and projects of Kevin Lynch. MIT press.
Macao Government Tourism Office. (2017a). Macao Tourism Industry Development Master Plan. Retrieved from https://masterplan.macaotourism.gov.mo/Comprehensive_Report_en.pdf
Macao Government Tourism Office. (2017b). Compilation Report of Public Opinions.Available online: http://industry.macaotourism.gov.mo/image/pressroom/20170110123346b.jpg
Macao Government Yearbook. (2013). Retrieved from https://yearbook.gcs.gov.mo/files/yearbook/2013/myb2013ePA01CH01.pdf
Macao Government Yearbook. (2018) Retrieved from http://yearbook.gcs.gov.mo/uploads/yearbook_pdf/2018/myb2018cPA01CH13.pdf
MacKay, K. J., & Couldwell, C. M. (2004). Using visitor-employed photography to investigate destination image. Journal of Travel Research, 42(4), 390-396.
MacKay, K. J., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1997). Pictorial element of destination in image formation. Annals of tourism research, 24(3), 537-565.
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of urban space: An inquiry into a socio-spatial process (p. 168). Chichester: Wiley.
Madanipour, A. (1999). Why are the design and development of public spaces significant for cities?. Environment and planning B: Planning and Design, 26(6), 879-891.
Madanipour, A. (Ed.). (2013). Whose public space?: International case studies in urban design and development. Routledge.
Madureira, H., Nunes, F., Oliveira, J., & Madureira, T. (2018). Preferences for urban green space characteristics: A comparative study in three Portuguese cities. Environments, 5(2), 23.
Makworo, M., & Mireri, C. (2011). Public open spaces in Nairobi City, Kenya, under threat. Journal of environmental planning and management, 54(8), 1107-1123.
Marchal, V., Dellink, R., Van Vuuren, D., Clapp, C., Chateau, J., Magné, B., & Van Vliet, J. (2011). OECD environmental outlook to 2050. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 8, 397-413.
Marcuse, P. (2004). The threat of terrorism and the right to the city. Fordham Urb. LJ, 32, 767.
Martí, P., Nolasco-Cirugeda, A., & Serrano-Estrada, L. (2017). Assessment tools for urban sustainability policies in Spanish Mediterranean tourist areas. Land Use Policy, 67, 625-639.
Martinelli, L., Battisti, A., & Matzarakis, A. (2015). Multicriteria analysis model for urban open space renovation: An application for Rome. Sustainable Cities and Society, 14, e10-e20.
Maruani, T., & Amit-Cohen, I. (2007). Open space planning models: A review of approaches and methods. Landscape and urban planning, 81(1-2), 1-13.
Mathieson, A., & Wall, G. (1982). Tourism, economic, physical and social impacts. London: Longman.
Matsuoka, R. H., & Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and urban planning, 84(1), 7-19.
Mayor of London (2004) The London Plan , Greater London Authority. Available online: https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/planning/london-plan/past-versions-and-alterations-london-plan/london-plan-2004
McCartney, G. (2005). The impact of the 50th Macau Grand Prix on Macau's destination image. International Journal of Event Management Research, 1(1), 46-64.
McCormack, G. R., Rock, M., Toohey, A. M., & Hignell, D. (2010). Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: A review of qualitative research. Health & place, 16(4), 712-726.
McEachan, R. R. C., Prady, S. L., Smith, G., Fairley, L., Cabieses, B., Gidlow, C., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2016). The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(3), 253-259.
Mean, M., & Tims, C. (2005). People make places: growing the public life of cities. Demos.
Michael, Y. L., Green, M. K., & Farquhar, S. A. (2006). Neighborhood design and active aging. Health & place, 12(4), 734-740.
Mitchell, D. (1995). The end of public space? People's Park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the association of American geographers, 85(1), 108-133.
Mitchell, R., Astell-Burt, T., & Richardson, E. A. (2011). A comparison of green space indicators for epidemiological research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 65(10), 853-858.
Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2007). Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(8), 681-683.
Moran, M., Van Cauwenberg, J., Hercky-Linnewiel, R., Cerin, E., Deforche, B., & Plaut, P. (2014). Understanding the relationships between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of qualitative studies. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 11(1), 79.
MORI. (2005). Physical Capital: Liveability in 2005. London: MORI. Available online: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/publication/8000-03/sri_local_gov_physical%20capital_liiveability_in_2005_2005.pdf
Naoi, T., Airey, D., Iijima, S., & Niininen, O. (2006). Visitors’ evaluation of an historical district: Repertory Grid Analysis and Laddering Analysis with photographs. Tourism Management, 27(3), 420-436.
Naoi, T., Yamada, T., Iijima, S., & Kumazawa, T. (2011). Applying the caption evaluation method to studies of visitors’ evaluation of historical districts. Tourism Management, 32(5), 1061-1074.
Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2007). Toward a methodology for measuring the security of publicly accessible spaces. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(3), 283-297.
Németh, J., & Schmidt, S. (2011). The privatization of public space: modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(1), 5-23.
Neto, O. A., Jeong, S., Munakata, J., Yoshida, Y., Ogawa, T., & Yamamura, S. (2016). Physical Element Effects in Public Space Attendance. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 15(3), 479-485.
Nday, R. U., & Manu, A. K. (2017). Vitality of Public Open Space (Case Study: Taman Nostalgia Kupang). Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4-1), 125-132.
Nutsford, D., Pearson, A. L., & Kingham, S. (2013). An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public health, 127(11), 1005-1011
Oku, H., & Fukamachi, K. (2006). The differences in scenic perception of forest visitors through their attributes and recreational activity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 75(1), 34-42.
Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Café, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House Publishers.
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455.
Ostergren, D., Solop, F. I., & Hagen, K. K. (2005). National park service fees: Value for the money or a barrier to visitation? Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 23(1).
Ou-Yang, Y. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., & Tzeng, G. H. (2008). A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International journal of operations research, 5(3), 160-168.
Pan, S., Lee, J., & Tsai, H. (2014). Travel photos: Motivations, image dimensions, and affective qualities of places. Tourism Management, 40, 59-69.
Park, C., & Song, H. (2018). Visitors’ perceived place value and the willingness to pay in an urban lake park. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(11), 2518.
Pauleit, S., Slinn, P., Handley, J., & Lindley, S. (2003). Promoting the natural greenstructure of towns and cities: English nature's accessible natural greenspace standards model. Built Environment, 29(2), 157-170.
Peng, K. H., & Tzeng, G. H. (2019). Exploring heritage tourism performance improvement for making sustainable development strategies using the hybrid-modified MADM model. Current Issues in Tourism, 22(8), 921-947.
Peschardt, K. K., Schipperijn, J., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2012). Use of Small Public Urgan Green Spaces (SPUGS). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 11(11), 234-244
Pikora, T., Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Jamrozik, K., & Donovan, R. (2003). Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social science & medicine, 56(8), 1693-1703.
PPG, 2002. Planning Policy Guidance 17 (PPG17): Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. Available online: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120920042539/http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/ppg17.pdf
PPS (Project for Public Spaces). (2011) What makes a successful spaces? Available online: http://www.pps.org/articles/grplacefeat/
Pusparini, F. D., & Arifin, H. S. (2017). Landscape Management of Public Open Space in Bogor Heritage City. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 91, No. 1, p. 012020). IOP Publishing.
Qu, G. B., Zhao, T. Y., Zhu, B. W., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, S. L. (2019). Use of a Modified DANP-mV Model to Improve Quality of Life in Rural Residents: The Empirical Case of Xingshisi Village, China. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(1), 153.
Rabe, S. E., Gantenbein, R., Richter, K. F., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2018). Increasing the credibility of expert-based models with preference surveys–Mapping recreation in the riverine zone. Ecosystem services, 31, 308-317.
Ramirez, L. K. B., Hoehner, C. M., Brownson, R. C., Cook, R., Orleans, C. T., Hollander, M., ... & Petersmarck, K. (2006). Indicators of activity-friendly communities: an evidence-based consensus process. American journal of preventive medicine, 31(6), 515-524.
Reklaitiene, R., Grazuleviciene, R., Dedele, A., Virviciute, D., Vensloviene, J., Tamosiunas, A., ... & Bernotiene, G. (2014). The relationship of green space, depressive symptoms and perceived general health in urban population. Scandinavian journal of public health, 42(7), 669-676.
Richardson, E. A., Pearce, J., Mitchell, R., & Kingham, S. (2013). Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health. Public health, 127(4), 318-324.
Ries, A. V., Voorhees, C. C., Roche, K. M., Gittelsohn, J., Yan, A. F., & Astone, N. M. (2009). A quantitative examination of park characteristics related to park use and physical activity among urban youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), S64-S70.
Rigg, K. K., McNeish, R., Schadrac, D., Gonzalez, A., & Tran, Q. (2019). Community needs of minority male youth living in inner-city Chicago. Children and Youth Services Review, 98, 284-289.
Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 160-169.
Roberts, H. V. (2017). Using Twitter data in urban green space research. Applied Geography, 81, 13-20.
Romolini, M., Ryan, R. L., Simso, E. R., & Strauss, E. G. (2019). Visitors’ Attachment to Urban Parks in Los Angeles, CA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.
Rosenzweig, R. (1985). Eight hours for what we will: Workers and leisure in an industrial city, 1870-1920. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenzweig, R., & Blackmar, E. (1992). The park and the people: a history of Central Park. Cornell University Press.
Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281.
Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process (Vol. 4922). Pittsburgh: RWS publications.
Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J. B., & Chen, D. (2003). Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. American journal of public health, 93(9), 1552-1558.
Scarles, C. E. (2011). Eliciting embodied knowledge and response: Respondent-led photography and visual autoethnography. In T. Rakic, & D. Chambers (Eds.), An introduction to visual research methods in tourism. London: Routledge
Schipperijn, J., Bentsen, P., Troelsen, J., Toftager, M., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2013). Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12(1), 109-116.
Schroeder, H. W., & Anderson, L. M. (1984). Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of leisure research, 16(2), 178-194.
Seaman, P. J., Jones, R., & Ellaway, A. (2010). It's not just about the park, it's about integration too: why people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 78.
Shafer, C. S., Lee, B. K., & Turner, S. (2000). A tale of three greenway trails: user perceptions related to quality of life. Landscape and urban planning, 49(3-4), 163-178.
Shen, K. Y., & Tzeng, G. H. (2018). Advances in multiple criteria decision making for sustainability: Modeling and applications. Sustainability, 10(5), 1–7.
Shi, S., Gou, Z., & Chen, L. H. (2014). How does enclosure influence environmental preferences? A cognitive study on urban public open spaces in Hong Kong. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13, 148-156.
Shores, K. A., & West, S. T. (2008). The relationship between built park environments and physical activity in four park locations. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(3), e9-e16.
Shores, K. A., & West, S. T. (2010). Rural and urban park visits and park-based physical activity. Preventive medicine, 50, S13-S17.
Smith, V. K., Poulos, C., & Kim, H. (2002). Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resource and energy economics, 24(1-2), 107-129.
Stedman, R., Beckley, T., Wallace, S., & Ambard, M. (2004). A picture and 1000 words: Using resident-employed photography to understand attachment to high amenity places. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(4), 580.
Stępień, J. (2018). Urban Green Space as a Tool for Cohesive and Healthy Urban Community. In Interdisciplinary Approaches for Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 5-15). Springer, Cham.
Sugiyama, T., Cerin, E., Owen, N., Oyeyemi, A. L., Conway, T. L., Van Dyck, D., ... & Mitáš, J. (2014). Perceived neighbourhood environmental attributes associated with adults׳ recreational walking: IPEN Adult study in 12 countries. Health & place, 28, 22-30.
Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N. J., Owen, N., & Giles-Corti, B. (2010). Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1752-1757.
Sugiyama, T., & Thompson, C. W. (2007). Outdoor environments, activity and the well-being of older people: conceptualising environmental support. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1943-1960.
Sugiyama, T., Thompson, C. W., & Alves, S. (2009). Associations between neighborhood open space attributes and quality of life for older people in Britain. Environment and behavior, 41(1), 3-21.
Sun, M., Ryan, C., & Pan, S. (2014). Assessing tourists' perceptions and behaviour through photographic and blog analysis: The case of Chinese bloggers and New Zealand holidays. Tourism Management Perspectives, 12, 125-133.
Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., & Woolley, H. (2003). Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment (1978-), 94-106.
Taylor, L., & Hochuli, D. F. (2017). Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 25-38.
Thompson, C. W. (2002). Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning, 60(2), 59-72.
Thompson, C. W. (2011). Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme. Landscape and urban planning, 99(3-4), 187-195.
Thompson, C. W. (2013). Activity, exercise and the planning and design of outdoor spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 79-96.
Thompson, C., Aspinall, P., Bell, S., & Findlay, C. (2005). “It gets you away from everyday life”: local woodlands and community use—what makes a difference?. Landscape Research, 30(1), 109-146. 
Thompson, C.W.; Sugiyama, T.; Alves, S.; Southwell, K (2007). Parks and Open Spaces: Design Findings and Recommendations. I’DGO-Inclusive Design for Getting Outdoors. Edinburgh: OPENspace. Last updated 10 June 2007. Available online: Http://www.idgo.ac.uk/design_guidance/open_spaces.htm#landscape
Timan, T., Newell, B. C., & Koops, B. J. (Eds.). (2017). Privacy in public space: Conceptual and regulatory challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Timperio, A., Jeffery, R. W., Crawford, D., Roberts, R., Giles-Corti, B., & Ball, K. (2010). Neighbourhood physical activity environments and adiposity in children and mothers: a three-year longitudinal study. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 7(1), 18.
Tsaur, S. H., Tzeng, G. H., & Wang, K. C. (1997). Evaluating tourist risks from fuzzy perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(4), 796-812.
Turel, H. S., Yigit, E. M., & Altug, I. (2007). Evaluation of elderly people's requirements in public open spaces: A case study in Bornova District (Izmir, Turkey). Building and Environment, 42(5), 2035-2045.
Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., & Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
Tzeng, G.H.; Huang, J.J.(2011). Multiple Attribute Decision Making—Methods and Applications; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA.
Tzeng, G. H., & Shen, K. Y. (2017). New concepts and trends of hybrid multiple criteria decision making. CRC Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition. Available from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications
Urban Task Force (1999) Towards an Urban Renaissance, Report of the Urban Task Force. London: E. and F.N. Spon.
Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. SAGE Publications Ltd.pp.119-154. Available online: http://thuvienso.vanlanguni.edu.vn/bitstream/Vanlang_TV/5893/6/SA2414-the-tourist-gaze-3-0-3e_n6.pdf
Van Cauwenberg, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Clarys, P., Nasar, J., Salmon, J., Goubert, L., & Deforche, B. (2016). Street characteristics preferred for transportation walking among older adults: a choice-based conjoint analysis with manipulated photographs. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 13(1), 6.
Van Cauwenberg, J., Van Holle, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Clarys, P., Nasar, J., Salmon, J., ... & Deforche, B. (2014). Physical environmental factors that invite older adults to walk for transportation. Journal of environmental psychology, 38, 94-103.
Van Dillen, S. M., de Vries, S., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2012). Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents' health: adding quality to quantity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(6), e8-e8.
Van Dyck, D., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Owen, N., Kerr, J., ... & Sallis, J. F. (2012). Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults’ transport-related walking and cycling: Findings from the USA, Australia and Belgium. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 70.
Van Hecke, L., Ghekiere, A., Van Cauwenberg, J., Veitch, J., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Van Dyck, D., ... & Deforche, B. (2018). Park characteristics preferred for adolescent park visitation and physical activity: A choice-based conjoint analysis using manipulated photographs. Landscape and urban planning, 178, 144-155.
Van Herzele, A., Collins, K., & Tyrväinen, L. (2005). Involving people in urban forestry—A discussion of participatory practices throughout Europe. In Urban forests and trees (pp. 207-228). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003). A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landscape and urban planning, 63(2), 109-126.
Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & De Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2), 5-18.
Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The star model of publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575-598
Vogt, S., Mielck, A., Berger, U., Grill, E., Peters, A., Döring, A., ... & Wolf, K. (2015). Neighborhood and healthy aging in a German city: distances to green space and senior service centers and their associations with physical constitution, disability, and health-related quality of life. European journal of ageing, 12(4), 273-283.
Walmsley, A. (2006). Greenways: multiplying and diversifying in the 21st century. Landscape and urban planning, 76(1-4), 252-290.
Wan, Y. K. P., & Li, X. (2013). Sustainability of tourism development in Macao, China. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(1), 52-65.
Wang, C. & Burris, M.A. (1992). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behaviour, 24(3), 369-387.
Wang, X., Li, X. R., Zhen, F., & Zhang, J. (2016). How smart is your tourist attraction?: Measuring tourist preferences of smart tourism attractions via a FCEM-AHP and IPA approach. Tourism Management, 54, 309-320.
Warren, S. (2005). Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(6): 861-882.
Wendel, H. E. W., Zarger, R. K., & Mihelcic, J. R. (2012). Accessibility and usability: Green space preferences, perceptions, and barriers in a rapidly urbanizing city in Latin America. Landscape and urban planning, 107(3), 272-282.
Whyte, W.H., 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.
Williams, K., & Green, S. (2001). Literature review of public space and local environments for the cross cutting review. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford Centre for Sustainable Development.
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and urban planning, 125, 234-244.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2016). Urban green spaces and health: A review of evidence. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/urban-health/publications/2016/urban-green-spaces-and-health-a-review-of-evidence-2016
World Health Organization (WHO). (2017). Urban Green Space Interventions and Health—A Review of Impacts and Effectiveness. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland. Available online: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/environment-and-health/urban-health/publications/2017/urban-green-space-interventions-and-health-a-review-of-impacts-and-effectiveness.-full-report-2017
World Health Organization & UN-Habitat. (2016). Global report on urban health: equitable healthier cities for sustainable development. World Health Organization.Available online: http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204715
Woolley, H. (2003). Urban open spaces. Taylor & Francis.
Woolley, H. (2006). Freedom of the city: Contemporary issues and policy influences on children and young people's use of public open space in England. Children's Geographies, 4(01), 45-59.
Xiong, L., Teng, C. L., Zhu, B. W., Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, S. L. (2017). Using the D-DANP-mV model to explore the continuous system improvement strategy for sustainable development of creative communities. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(11), 1309.
Yamashita, S. (2002). Perception and evaluation of water in landscape: use of Photo-Projective Method to compare child and adult residents’ perceptions of a Japanese river environment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62(1), 3-17.
Yang, J. L., & Tzeng, G. H. (2011). An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1417-1424.
Yu, P. L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8), 936-946.
Yung, E. H., Conejos, S., & Chan, E. H. (2016a). Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities, 52, 114-122.
Yung, E. H., Conejos, S., & Chan, E. H. (2016b). Public open spaces planning for the elderly: The case of dense urban renewal districts in Hong Kong. Land use policy, 59, 1-11.
Zavadskas, E. K., Govindan, K., Antucheviciene, J., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29(1), 857-887.
Zeitler, E., Buys, L., Aird, R., & Miller, E. (2012). Mobility and active ageing in suburban environments: Findings from in-depth interviews and person-based GPS tracking. Current gerontology and geriatrics research, 2012.
Ziller, R. C., & Lewis, D. (1981). Orientations: Self, social, and environmental percepts through auto-photography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 338-343.
Zhai, Y., Li, K., & Liu, J. (2018). A Conceptual Guideline to Age-Friendly Outdoor Space Development in China: How Do Chinese Seniors Use the Urban Comprehensive Park? A Focus on Time, Place, and Activities. Sustainability, 10(10), 3678.
Zhang, T., & Yu, Y. (2010). The Production and Management of Urban Public Open Space in the Globalization Era: The Case of Qianjiang New Town [J]. In Urban Planning Forum (Vol. 5, pp. 5-14).
Zhu, B. W., Zhang, J. R., Tzeng, G. H., Huang, S. L., & Xiong, L. (2017). Public open space development for elderly people by using the DANP-V model to establish continuous improvement strategies towards a sustainable and healthy aging society. Sustainability, 9(3), 420.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE