|
參考文獻 中文部分 林煥祥(2009)。科學素養的評量。科學發展,438,66-69。 洪振方(2003)。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報,15,641-662。 洪振方、封中興(2011)。以「探索-論證- 評價」為基礎的探究教學模式在國中自然科之教學成效。科學教育研究與發展季刊,60,1-34。 吳明珠(2008)。科學模型本質剖析:認識論面向初探。科學教育月刊,306,2-8。 吳百興、張耀云、吳心楷(2010)。科學探究活動中的科學推理。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56,53-74。 翁群評(2016)。學科能力測驗自然考科與科學素養評量之關連性探討。考試學刊,11,42-76頁 周金城(2008)。探究中學生對科學模型的分類與組成本質的理解。科學教育月刊,306,10-17。 邱美虹(2015)。以系統化方式進行模型與建模能力之線上教學與評量系統—探討科學課程、概念發展路徑與建模能力之研究。科技部計畫報告。 邱美虹(2008)。模型與建模能力之理論架構。科學教育月刊,306,2-9。 邱美虹(2016)。科學模型、科學建模與建模能力。臺灣化學教育,第十一期。網頁:http://chemed.chemistry.org.tw/?p=13898。 邱美虹和劉俊庚(2008)。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建模能力。科學教育月刊,314,2-20。 陳毓凱、洪振方(2007)。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育月刊,305,4-19。 曾茂仁(2016)。探討建模本位探究教學於化學電池的學習成效與建模能力 國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。 楊琇停和王國華(2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育月刊,15(4),439-459。 教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱。台北:教育部。 張志康(2009)。從概念改變理論探究建模教學對學生力學心智模式與建模能力之影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。 國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校——自然科學領域。查詢日期:2018年11月20日,檢自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/63/pta_18538_24Y0851_60502.pdf。 劉俊庚(2010)。探討模型與建模對於學生學習原子概念之影響。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。 劉湘瑤(2016)。科學探究的教學與評量。科學研習,55(2),5-11 鐘建坪(2010)。引導式建模導向探究教學初探。科學教育月刊,328,2-19。 鐘建坪(2013)。模型本位探究策略在不同場域學習成效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。 國家教育研究院(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校——自然科學領域。查詢日期:2018年11月20日,檢自https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/63/pta_18538_24Y0851_60502.pdf。 劉湘瑤(2016)。科學探究的教學與評量。科學研習,55(2),5-11 謝州恩、吳心楷(2005)。探究情境中國小學童科學解釋能力成長之研究。師大學報:科學教育類,50(2),55-84。 英文部分 Apedoe, X. S. (2008). Engaging students in inquiry: Tales from an undergraduate geology laboratory-based course. Science Education, 92(4), 631-663. Bell, D. (2002). Making science inclusive: Providing effective learning opportunitiesfor children with learning difficulties. Support for Learning, 17(4), 156-161. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. N. H. Heinemann: Portsmounth. Bybee, R. W. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell, & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (20-46). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Brickman P., Gormally C., Armstrong N., Hallar B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students' science literacy and confidence. Int. J. Schol. Teach. Learn. 3, 1-22. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Buckley, B. C. & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Investigating the Role of Representations and Expressed Models in Building Mental Models. In J. K. Gilbert and C.J. Boulter(eds.), Developing Models in Science Education (pp.119-135.) Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Buckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlits, B., et al. (2004). Model-based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 23-41. Campbell, B., Kaunda, L., Allie, S., Buffler, A. & Lubben, F. (2000). The communication of lab investigations by university entrants. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 839–853. Campbell, T., Abd-Hamid, N. H., & Chapman, H. (2010). Development of instruments to assess teacher and student perceptions of inquiry experiences in science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 13–30. Cheng, M. F., Lin, J. L., Lin, S. Y., & Cheng, C. H. (2017). Scaffolding middle school and high school students’modeling processes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 207–217. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Implications for learning and discovery in sciences. In R.Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science:Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science(129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Chiu, M.-H., & Lin, J.-W. (2019). Modeling competence in science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://diser.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43031-019-0012-y Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041-1053. Costenson, K. & Lawson, A.E. (1986). Why isn't inquiry used in more classrooms? The American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150-158. de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM education: The Go-Lab federation of online labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1, 3–16. Dewey, J.[1933(1910)]. How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath. diSessa, A. A.(1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman 8: P. Pufall (Eds), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12. Edelson, D.C., Gordin, D.N. & Pea, R.D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450. Ertepinar, H. & Geban, O. (1996). Effect of instruction supplied with the investigative oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course. Educational Research, 38, 333–344. European CommissionScience education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. European Commission., Brussels (2007) Gibson, H. L. (1998). Case studies of an inquiry-based science programs’ impact on students’ attitudes towards science and interest in science careers. ERIC document reproduction service no. ED 417 980. Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes toward science. Science Education, 86, 693-705. Giere, R. N. (1999). Using models to represent reality. In L. Magnani, N. J.Nersessian, & P.Thagard (eds.), Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery ( 41-57). New York:Kluwer. Gilbert, J. K. (1993). Models and modeling in science education. Hatfield: The Association for Science Education. Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modeling : routes to more authentic science education, International Journal of Science, & Math Education, 2, 115-130. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., J., & Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert and C. J. Boulter (eds.) Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (1995). Learning science meaningfully: constructing conceptual models. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gobert, J. D., & Buckley, B., et al. (2000). Introduction to model-based teaching and learning in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891–894. Greca, I. M., & Moriea, M. A. (2000). Mental model, conceptual models, and modelling.International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1-11. Grosslight, L.; Unger, C.; Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science conceptions of middle and high school students and experts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799-822. Halloun, I. A. (2006).Modeling Theory in Science Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. Hansen, M. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37. Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science Mathematics & ICT Education, 7, 9–33. Harms, N. C. & Yager, R. E. (eds.) (1981). What research says to the science teacher,Vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association. Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atom, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84(3), 352-381. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<352::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-J Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171–212. Jeong, H., Songer, N. B., & Lee, S.-Y. (2007). Evidentiary competence: Sixth graders' understanding for gathering and interpreting evidence in scientific investigations. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 75-97. Jong, C. P.; Chiu, M. H. & Chung, S. L. (2015).The use of modeling-based rext to improve students’ modeling competencies.Science Education, 99(5),986–1018. Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modeling, and implications for the education of modelers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369-387. Keselman A. (2003) Supporting inquiry learning by promoting normative understanding of multivariable causality.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40 (2003), pp.898-921 Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. doi: 10.1177/1365480216659733 Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology, pp. 275-297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018 Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). "Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 313-350. Krajcik, J. S., & Czerniak, C. L. (2014). Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project-based approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. 404 pp. ISBN 978-0-415-53405-5, Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1998). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Khan, S. (2007). Model-Based Inquiries in Chemistry. Science Education, 91, 877-905. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000b). Model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 5). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2000). Symbolizing, communicating, and mathematizing: Key components of models and modeling. Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers , 361– 384 Liu, C. K., & Chiu, M. H. (2010). Modeling process of structure of the atom and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Paper presented at ASERA 2010, Australia,Sydney. Louca, T., Zacharia, Z.C., & Constantinou, C.P. (2011). In quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 919–951. Luckie, D. B., Maleszewski, J. J., Loznak, S. D., & Krha, M. (2004). Infusion of Collaborative Inquiry throughout a Biology Curriculum Increases Student Learning: a Four-year Study of "Teams and Streams". Advances in Physiology Education, 28(4), 199-209. Mäeots M., Pedaste M., Sarapuu T. 2008. Transforming students’ inquiry skills with computer-based simulations. In 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 1–5 July, Santander, Spain. DOI:10.1109/ICALT.2008.239. Maia, P. F., & Justi, R. (2009). Learning of chemical equilibrium through modelling-based teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 603-630. Martin-Hansen(2002). Defining Inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37. McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion.In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mentalmodels (pp.299-324). Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaum Associates, Inc. Namdar, B., & Shen, J. (2015). Modeling-oriented assessment in K-12 science education: A synthesis of research from 1980 to 2013 and new directions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 993-1023. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1012185 National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Nersessian, N.J. (2008) Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. NGSS (2013). View the NGSS (next generation science standards) in disciplinary core idea (DCI) Arrangements, in topic arrangements, performance expectations individually. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards Niss, M. (2009). Metamodelling messages conveyed in five statistical mechanical textbooks from 1963 to 2001. International Journal of Science Education, 31(5), 697-719. Pedaste M., Mäeots M., Siiman L.A., De Jong T., Van Riesen S.A., Kamp E.T., Tsourlidaki E. (2015) Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational research review 14, 47-61. Passmore, C., Stewart, J., & Cartier, J. (2009). Model-based inquiry and school science:Creating connections. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 394–402 Pfundt, F. & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science education. (3rd ed.). Keil, West Germany: IPN. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66(2), 211-227. Rumelhart, D. E. & Norman, D. A. (1981).Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning. In R. Klatsky & J. W. Cotton(Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Salomon, G., D. N. Perkins, & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20 , 2–9. Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. Saari, H., & Viiri, J. (2003). A research-based teaching sequence for teaching the concept of modeling to seventh-grade students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1333-1352. Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(5), 410-422. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1–103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Schwarz, C. V. & White, B. Y. (2005). Metamodeling knowledge: developing students’understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 165-205. Schwarz, C.V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654. Sensevy, G., Tiberghien, A., Sylvain Laube, J. S., & Griggs, P. (2008). An epistemological approach to modeling: cases studies and implications for science teaching. Science Education, 92, 424-446. Shen, J., & Conferey, J. (2007). From conceptual change to transformative modeling: a case study of an elementary teacher in learning astronomy. Science Education, 91,948-966. Shrigley, R.L.(1990). Attitude and behavior correlates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 97-113. Stake,R.E.,& Easley,J.A.(1978).Case studies in science education.Urbana,IL:Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation,University of Illinois. Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk. http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2002). Students’ understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-368. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2002). Experienced teachers’ knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modelling in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1255-1272. doi:10.1080/09500690210126711 Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development.Review of educational research, 57, 51-67. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change [special issue].Learning and instruction, 4, 45-69. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). "Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students. "COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 16(1), 3-118. Wilhelm, P., & Beishuizen, J. J. (2003). Content effects in self-directed inductive learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 381-402 Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112-143. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941– 967. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2015). Models and Modeling: An Introduction. (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27, 172-223.
|