:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從當事人意思自治論仲裁之保全程序
作者:蔡惟鈞
作者(外文):TSAI, WEI-CHUN
校院名稱:中國文化大學
系所名稱:法律學系
指導教授:李復甸
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:仲裁臨時措施當事人意思自治單方臨時措施初步命令緊急仲裁人程序ArbitrationProvisional MeasuresInterim MeasuresParty AutonomyEx Parte Interim MeasuresPreliminary OrderEmergency Arbitrator Procedures
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
伴隨國際經貿往來之日益頻繁,因商業慣例、文化經濟體制、政策規章等差異,所造成之投資貿易爭議時常可見。若能建立一套完善且良好之爭端解決機制,得使投資人於面對商業爭端時更具信心,亦降低投資貿易不確定風險。因此於國際經貿的發展上,爭端解決機制之重要性不可言喻。近年來,於眾多商事爭端解決機制中,受到國際商事爭端當事人所重視者,即是具有迅速性、專業性、程序選擇之自由性、保密性與可執行性等優點的仲裁。
所謂之仲裁制度,係透過當事人間相互約定,將爭端提交於值得信賴之第三人(仲裁人)判斷,作為解決爭端之途徑。而仲裁制度中,訂有仲裁協議之爭端當事人於爭議交付仲裁前或仲裁程序進行中,就是否肯定當事人得賦予仲裁庭核准具有保全性質暫時措施之權限,隨著仲裁制度之發展有著不同之變化。本研究之目的,即係從當事人意思自治與仲裁間之關係出發,試圖尋找我國現行《仲裁法》下,就仲裁保全程序之解釋,是否仍具有不同之可能,並且就我國仲裁制度中保全程序之未來發展及立法修正提出規劃。
Obtaining provisional measures swiftly is paramount importance for parties in arbitration. Whether a provisional measure of protection is an arbitral award is a hotly debated question. Traditionally, requests for provisional measures have been a construct of courts. However, re-questing provisional measures from an arbitrator are increasingly being. There is a great debate within the international community as to the recommend, legality and enforceability of suggestion. This article will proceed to analyze the disadvantages, problems and the alleged ad-vantages of provisional measures from an arbitrator application in ar-bitration.
中文
一、專書
1.王澤鍵,民法總則,自版,2014年2月三版。
2.林俊益,國際商務仲裁淺析,永元文化,1993年10月初版。
3.姚瑞光,民事訴訟法論,自版,2012年1月版。
4.陳煥文,國際仲裁法專論,五南圖書出版有限公司,1994年4月初版。
5.黃翰義,改良式當事人進行主義之訴訟制度與程序正義,司法研究年報,第26輯,第4篇,司法院,2009年初版。
6.楊良宜、莫世杰、楊大明,仲裁法-從1996年英國仲裁法到國際商務仲裁,法律出版社,2006年。
7.楊建華、鄭傑夫,民事訴訟法要論(全),自版,2009年10月版。
8.楊玲,國際商事仲裁程序研究,法律出版社,2011年12月初版。
9.楊崇森、黃正宗 等合著,仲裁法新論,中華民國仲裁協會,2008年增訂三版。
10.趙秀文,國際商事仲裁法,中國人民大學出版社,2012年10月三版。
11.藍獻林,仲裁法論叢(一),自版,1988年7月初版。
二、期刊
1.吳從周,論「供擔保代釋明」之假扣押-評析民事訴訟法第526條第2項之修法變化,台灣法學雜誌,第187期,頁10,2011年。
2.李復甸、蔡惟鈞,國際仲裁制度回顧與展望,月旦法學,第269期,2017年10月。
3.李貴英,一九九六年英國新仲裁法評析,法學叢刊,第169期,1998年1月。
4.徐盛國,論智慧權糾紛之仲裁容許性(2),智慧財產權,2001年4月。
5.張庭禎,國際商務仲裁制度之研究(上),軍法專刊,第42卷第4期,1996年4月。
6.莊漢、張晨晨,中國大陸商事仲裁中的保全措施研究,兩岸商法評論,第3期第1卷,2012年12月。
7.許兆慶,美國二000年修訂統一仲裁法簡析(上),仲裁季刊,第64期,2002年6月。
8.藍瀛芳,仲裁的保全程序,仲裁季刊,第94期,2011年12月。
9.藍瀛芳,從德國新仲裁法看我國新仲裁法,商務仲裁,第51期,1998年11月。
英文
一、專書
1.ASSOCIATION FOR INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, INTERIM MEASURES IN INTERNA-TIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (Maklu Uitgevers N.V., 1st ed. 2007).
2.BERG, ALBERT JAN VAN DEN, NEW HORIZONS FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND BEYOND (Kluwer Law., 1st ed. 2005).
3.BERGER, KLAUS PETER, PRIVATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL BUSI-NESS: NEGOTIATION, MEDIATION, ARBITRATION (KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, 1ST ED. 2006).
4.BERGER, KLAUS PETER, INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC ARBITRATION (Kluwer Law International, 1st ed. 1993)
5.BERNARDINI, PIERO, THE ITALIAN LAW ON ARBITRATION: TEXT & NOTES (Kluwer Law, 1st ed. 1998).
6.BLINDER, PETER, INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION IN UNCITRAL MODEL LAW JURISDICTIONS (Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd ed. 2005).
7.BORN, GARY B, INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 2016 (Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 1st ed. 2009).
8.BORN, GARY, INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: LAW AND PRACTICE (Kluwer Law International, 2nd ed. 2016).
9.Chukwumerije, Okezie, Choice of Law in International Commercial Ar-bitration (Praeger, 1st ed. 1994).
10.FOUNCHARD, PHILIPPE, EMMANUEL GAILLARD & JOHN SAVAGE, FOUCHARD GAIL-LARD GOLDMAN ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (CITIC Publish-ing house, 1st ed. 2004).
11.FOURET, JULIEN, AND SAMAA HARIDI, 2017 ICC DISPUTE RESOLUTION STATISTICS (ICC Services, 1st ed. 2018).
12.HOLTZMANNT, HOWARD M., AND JOSEPH E. NEUHAUS, A GUIDE TO THE UN-CITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND COMMENTARY (Kluwer Law International, 1st ed. 1989).
13.HUNTER, MARTIN, AND ALAN REDFERN, LAW AND PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (Sweet & Maxwell, 4th ed. 2004)
14.LEW, JULIAN D. M., APPLICABLE LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: A STUDY IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS (Oceana Publications, 1st ed. 1987).
15.LEW, JULIAN D.M., LOUKAS A. MISTELIS AND STEFAN KRÖLL, COMPARATIVE IN-TERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION (Kluwer Law International, 2nd ed. 2003).
16.MOSER, MICHAEL J., ARBITRATION IN ASIA (Juris Publishing, 2nd ed. 2008).
17.NOUSSIA, KYRIAKI, REINSURANCE ARBITRATIONS (Springer, 1st ed. 2014).
18.RUBINO-SAMMARTANO, MAURO, INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION LAW AND PRACTICE (Juris Net, LLC., 3rd ed. 2014).
19.SUTTON, DAVID ST. JOHN, GILL, JUDITH, AND MATTHEW GEARING, RUSSELL ON AR-BITRATION (Sweet & Maxwell, 24th ed. 2015).
20.YANNACA-SMALL, KATIA, ARBITRATION UNDER INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT AGREEMENTS: A GUIDE TO THE KEY ISSUES (Oxford University Press, 1st ed. 2010).
21.YEŞILIRMAX, ALI, PROVISIONAL MEASURES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBI-TRATION (Kluwer Law, 1st ed. 2005)
22.ZEKOS, GEORGIOS I., INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AND MARINE ARBITRATION (Routledge-Cavendish, 1st ed. 2008)
二、專書論文
1.Cordero-Moss, Giuditta, The Arbitral Tribunal’S Power in Respect of The Parties’ Pleadings as A Limit to Party Autonomy, on Jura Novit Curia And Related Issues, in LIMITS TO PARTY AUTONOMY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 289 (Franco Ferrari ed., Juris Net, LLC, 1st ed. 2016).
2.Heider, Manfred, and Alice Fremuth Wolf, Austria, in GLOBAL LEGAL IN-SIGHTS – INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 26 (Joe Tirado ed., Global Legal Group Ltd, 2nd ed. 2016).
三、期刊
1.Ansari, Jamshed, Party Autonomy in Arbitration: A Critical Analysis, 6(6) RESEARCHER 47 (2014)
2.Bassler, William G., The Enforceability of Emergency Awards in the United States: or When Interim Means Final, 32 ARBITRATION INTERNA-TIONAL 559 (2016).
3.Berger, Klaus Peter, The Implementation of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Germany, 13 MEALEY’S INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION REPORT 38 (1998).
4.Bockstiegel, Karl-Heinz, The Role of Party Autonomy in International Arbitration, 51-SUM DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL 24 (1997).
5.Born, Gary, A New Generation of International Adjudication, 61 DUKE LAW JOURNAL 775 (2012).
6.Branson, C., Interim Measures of Protection in a Changing Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration World, 9 CROATIAN ARBITRATION YEARBOOK 9 (2002).
7.Brower, Charles H., What I Tele You Three Times is True: U.S. Courts and Pre-Award Interim Measure Under the New York Convention, 35 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 971 (1995).
8.Bucy, Dana Renée, How to Best Protect Party Rights: The Future of Interim Relief in International Commercial Arbitration Under the Amended UNCITRAL Model Law, 25 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 579 (2010).
9.Carlevaris, Andrea, and José Ricardo Feris, Running in the ICC Emer-gency Arbitrator Rules: The First Ten Cases, 25(1) ICC INT COURT OF AR-BITRATION BULLETIN 25 (2014).
10.Castello, James E., Arbitral Ex Parte Interim Relief: The View in Favor, 58-OCT DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL 60 (2003).
11.Chan, Andrew, and Renita Sophia Crasta, Interim Measures in Aid of Foreign Arbitration - a Re-think, 20 SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW JOURNAL 769 (2008).
12.Chionopoulos, Michael E., Preliminary Injunction Through Arbitration: The Franchisor's Weapon of Choice in Trademark Disputes, 20-SUM FRANCHISE LAW JOURNAL 15 (2000).
13.Davies, Martin, Court-Ordered Interim Measures in Aid of International Commercial Arbitration, 17 AMERICAN REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRA-TION 299 (2006).
14.Ferguson, Stephen M., Interim Measures of Protection in International Commercial Arbitration: Problems, Proposed Solutions, and Antici-pated Results, 12-WTR CURRENTS: INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW JOURNAL 55 (2003).
15.Fraraccio, Victoria M., Ex Parte Preliminary Orders in the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 10 VINDOBONA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW AND ARBITRATION 263 (2006).
16.Fry, Jason, and Clifford Chance, The Emergency Arbitrator - Flawed Fashion or Sensible Solution?, 7 No. 2 DISPUTE RESOLUTION INTERNATIONAL 179 (2013).
17.Garnett, Richard, International Arbitration Law: Progress Towards Harmonisation, 3(2) MELBOURNE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 400 (2002).
18.Giaretta, Ben, Duties of Arbitrators and Emergency Arbitrators under the SIAC Rules, 8 ASIAN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION JOURNAL 196 (2012).
19.Goldstein, Marc J., A Glance into History for the Emergency Arbitrator, 40 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 779 (2017).
20.Grunert, Jens, Interlocutory Remedies in England and Germany: A Comparative Perspective, 15 CIVIL JUSTICE QUARTERLY 18 (1996).
21.Hanessian, Grant, and E. Alexandra Dosman, Songs of Innocence and Experience: Ten Years of Emergency Arbitration, 27 AMERICAN REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 215 (2016).
22.Hickie, Kieran Robert, The Enforceability of Interim Measures of Pro-tection Granted by Arbitral Tribunals Outside the Seat of Arbitration: A New Approach, 12 VINDOBONA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW AND ARBITRATION 221 (2008).
23.Houtte, Hans van, Ten Reasons Against a Proposal for Ex Parte In-terim Measures of Protection in Arbitration. 20 ARBITRATION INTERNA-TIONAL 85 (2004).
24.Khan, L. Ali, Arbitral Autonomy. 74 LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW 1 (2013).
25.Kröll, Stefan, The Non-Enforceability of Decisions Rendered in Sum-mary Arbitral Proceedings Pursuant to the NAI Rules Under the New York Convention, 23 AMERICAN REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 75 (2012).
26.Lew, Julian D. M., Achieving the Dream: Autonomous Arbitration, 22(2) ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL 179 (2006).
27.Lu, May, The New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforce-ment of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Analysis of the Seven Defenses to Oppose Enforcement in the United States and England, Vol. 23, No. 3 ARIZONA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW 747 (2006).
28.McDonell, Neil E., The Availability of Provisional Relief in International Commercial Arbitration, 22 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW 273 (1983).
29.Michaelson, Peter, When Speed and Cost Matter: Emergency and Ex-pedited Arbitration, Vol. 218, No.4 NEW JERSEY LAW JOURNAL 50 (2014).
30.Myburgh, Andrew, and Jordi Paniagua, Does International Commercial Arbitration Promote Foreign Direct Investment?, 59 THE JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS 597 (2016).
31.Paraguacuto-Mahéo, Diana, and Christine Lecuyer-Thieffry, Emergen-cy Arbitrator: A New Player in the Field - The French Perspective, 40 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 749 (2017).
32.Redfern, D. Alan, Arbitration and the Courts: Interim Measures of Pro-tection--Is the Tide about to Turn?, 30 TEXAS INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 71 (1995).
33.Roth, Marianne, Interim Measures. 2012 JOURNAL OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION 425 (2012).
34.Santacroce, Fabio G., The Emergency Arbitrator: A Full-Fledged Arbi-trator Rendering an Enforceable Decision, 31 ARBITRATION INTERNATION-AL 283 (2015).
35.Saville, Lord Justice, Departmental Advisory Committee on Arbitration Law 1996 Report on the Arbitration Bill, 13 ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL 275 (1997).
36.Semple, W. G., The UNCITRAL Model Law and provisional measures in international commercial arbitration, 4 ARBITRATION AND DISPUTE RESO-LUTION LAW JOURNAL 269 (1994).
37.Sharma, Raghav, Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading SA: Ambushing International Commercial Arbitration Outside India?, 26(3) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 357(2009).
38.Sherwin, Peter J.W., and Douglas C. Rennie, Interim Relief Under In-ternational Arbitration Rules and Guidelines: A comparative Analysis. 20 AMERICAN REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 317 (2009).
39.Tat, Yeo Chuan, Xi, Choo Zheng, and Lye Kah Cheong, Interim Measures in Aid of Foreign Arbitrations – Time for the Deus Ex Machi-na?, 21 SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW JOURNAL 429 (2009).
40.Wang, William, International Arbitration: The Need for Uniform Interim Measures of Relief, 28 BROOKLYN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 1059 (2003).
41.Wauk, Alison C., Preliminary Injunctions in Arbitrable Disputes: The Case for Limited Court Jurisdiction, 44 UCLA LAW REVIEW 2061 (1997).
42.Werbicki, Raymond J., Arbitral Interim Measures: Fact or Fiction?, 57- JAN DISPUTE RESOLUTION JOURNAL 62 (2003).
43.Wirth, Markus, Interim or Preventive Measures in Support of Interna-tional Arbitration in Switzerland, 18 ASA BULLETIN 31 (2000).
44.Yesilirmak, Ali, Provisional and Protective Measures under Austrian Ar-bitration Law, 23 ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL 593 (2007).
45.Yu, Hong-lin, A Theoretical Overview of the Foundations of Interna-tional Commercial Arbitration, 1(2) CONTEMPORARY ASIA ARBITRATION JOURNAL 255 (2008).
德文
一、專書
1.Bandel, Stefan (2000), Einstweiliger Rechtsschutz im Schiedsverfahren: Zulässigkeit und Wirkungen schiedsrichterlicher und gerichtlicher einstweiliger Maßnahmen gemäß den Bestimmungen des SchiedsVfG. Münchener Universitätsschriften, Reihe der Juristischen Fakultät, 1. Aufl., München: Beck.
二、專書論文
1.Dr. Klaus Schumacher (1994), Fragen zum Anwendungsbereich des künftigen deutschen Schiedsver fahrensrechts, in: Aldin/Böckstiegel (Hrsg.), Festschrift für Ottoarndt Glossner zum 70 Geburtstag Gebun-dene, Frankfurt: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH, S. 341.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE