參考文獻
中文部分
王瓊珠(1991)：國小六年級閱讀障礙學童與普通學童閱讀認知能力之比較研
究。臺北市: 國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
行政院發展考核委員會(2005)：教育改革與教育政策：教育家的話 II (林天佑主
編)。臺北市: 行政院發展考核委員會。
吳美瑤、曾玉村(2019)：角色提及順位與呈現形式對中文讀者代名詞推論的影
響。教育心理學報，50(3)，437-454。
孟瑛如、田仲閔、魏銘志、周文聿 (2015)：國民小學四至六年級閱讀理解診斷
測驗。新北市: 心理出版社。
孟瑛如、張淑蘋、范姜雅菁、陳虹君、周文聿 (2015)：國民小學四至六年級識
字診斷測驗。新北市: 心理出版社。
邱麗景、王穗蘋、陳烜之(2012)：閱讀理解中的代詞加工: 先行詞的距離與性别
刻板印象的作用。心理學報，44(10)，1279-1288。
柯華葳(1997)：國語文低成就學生之閱讀理解能力研究(II)，行政院國家科學委
員會研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC86-2413-H-194-002-F5) 。
洪國鈞、李姝慧、陳修元、周泰立(2010)：語意部件與關聯強度對成人與國小
五年級孩童漢字語意處理效應的差異。中華心理學刊，52(3)，327-344。
南一書局出版社(2020)：讀書報告-佐賀的超級阿嬤。國民小學國語五下(第十冊)。臺南：南一。
張必隱、Danks, J. H. (1989)：中英文閱讀理解之比較研究。心理學報，1(04),
12-19。
教育部(2010)：「悅讀 101」教育部國民中小學提升閱讀計畫（2010年4月8
日）。教育部電子報，404期。
教育部(2011)：在職教師閱讀教學增能研習手冊。臺北市: 國立臺灣師範大學。
連啟舜、曾玉村(2018)：學童摘要的推論歷程。教育心理學報，48(4），537-
556。
陳偉英、皮姆馬克、泰德桑德斯(2013)：句法角色與話題性對實體突顯性的影
響。浙江大學學報 (人文社會科學版)，43(1)，122-134。
陳淑娟(1997)：「指導--合作學習」策略應用於國小閱讀教學之理論探討。臺中
師院學報，11，65-112。
陳黎明、許建章(2004)：現代漢語。青島: 中國海洋大學出版社。
陳薇帆(2001):以事件相關電位探討中文語音辨識中的字形一致性效應。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
曾志朗 (1989)：開拓華語文研究的新境界:中國心理學應面對認知與神經科學的
挑戰-一個不尊重自己語言的文化必然走向死亡。語文建設通訊(香港)，
24，18-40。
曾村玉、黃華秋、張菀芯(2018)：學童閱讀歷程的代名詞與因果推論發展研究:
橫切與個別差異的分析。教育心理學報，49(4)，513-535。
焦建亭、張必隱(2005)：漢語動詞的隱含因果性對代詞加工的影响。心理科
學，28(5)，1082-1085。
黃秋華 (2011)。學童代名詞推論的發展研究。臺南市: 國立成功大學教育研究
所博士論文(未出版)。
黃秋華、陸偉明 (2017)：代名詞與人名之性別訊息對學童閱讀代名詞之影響。
臺東大學教育學報，28(1)，53-76。
黃秋華、曾玉村、陸偉明(2014a)：提及順位在中文學童零代詞推論的效應。教
育心理學報，46(2)，233-250。
黃秋華、陸偉明、曾玉村(2014b)：中文學童代名詞推論能力的發展研究: 提及
順位與性別語意特徵的影響。教育心理學報，45(4)，555-576.
劉敏、陳修元、周泰立、吳瑞屯(2018): 國小三年級、 六年級學童及大學生字
彙處理歷程中語意部件扮演角色之發展變化。中華心理學刊，60(2)，81-
100。

外文部分
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load
hypothesis. Psychological review, 106(4), 748-765.
Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronominal
antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 35(3), 427-440.
Ariel, M.(2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, &
W. Spooren(Eds.), Text representation: Liguistic and psycholinguistic aspects
(pp. 29-87). Philly, PA: John Benjamins.
Arnold, J. E. (2001). The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of
reference continuation. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 137-162.
Arnold, J. E., Eisenband, J. G., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. C. (2000). The
rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun
resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76(1), B13-26.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual
review of psychology, 63, 1-29.
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. The
crosslinguistic study of sentence processing, 3, 3-76.
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and
language learning. Mechanisms of language acquisition, 157-193.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with
crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and
language, 59(4), 390-412.
Bock, J. K., & Irwin, D. E. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in
sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 19(4), 467.
Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive
Psychology, 2(4), 331-350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-3
Cacciari, C., Corradini, P., Padovani, R., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Pronoun resolution
in Italian: The role of grammatical gender and context. Journal of Cognitive
Psychology, 23(4), 416-434.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P.
Bryant(Eds). Handbook of children’s literacy (pp. 313-338). Dordrecht,
Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cajkler, W., & Comber, C. (2003). Accuracy in key stage 3 writing: a case study of
students' writing in a mixed secondary school. Paper presented at the British
Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Heriot-Watt University.
Callahan, S. M. (2008). Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from
electrophysiological studies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(3), 231-266.
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of
anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5),
601-609.
Carminati, M. N. (2005). Processing reflexes of the Feature Hierarchy (Person>
Number> Gender) and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua, 115(3),
259-285.
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical
gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and
Spanish. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49(3), 639-663.
Carreiras, M., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Villa, V. (1995). The advantage of first mention
in Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(1), 124-129.
Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development. Firt Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Chambers, C. G., & Smyth, R. (1998). Structural parallelism and discourse coherence:
A test of centering theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 593-608.
Chang, F. R. (1980). Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension:
Clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory & Cognition, 8(1), 58-64.
Chen, H.-C., Cheung, H., Tang, S. L., & Wong, Y. T. (2000). Effects of antecedent
order and semantic context on Chinese pronoun resolution. Memory &
Cognition, 28(3), 427-438. doi:10.3758/BF03198558
Chen, J.-Y., & Su, J.-J. (2011). Differential sensitivity to the gender of a person by
English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(3),
195-203.
Cheng, W., & Almor, A. (2017a). The effect of implicit causality and consequentiality
on nonnative pronoun resolution. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(1), 1-26.
Cheng, W., & Almor, A. (2017b). Referent predictability is affected by syntactic
structure: Evidence from Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(1),
157-174.
Corbett, A. T., & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential
antecedents. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 283-294.
Crawley, R. A., Stevenson, R. J., & Kleinman, D. (1990). The use of heuristic
strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 19(4), 245-264.
Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent
information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 121-132.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80010-3
Dery, J. E., & Bittner, D. (2016). Time and causation in discourse: Temporal
proximity, implicit causality, and re-mention biases. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 45(4), 883-899.
Department for Education( 2013). English programmes of study: key stages 1 and 2 (National curriculum in England). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335186/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_English_220714.pdf
Department for Education and Employment. (2000). The national literacy strategy:
Grammar for writing. Retrieved from http://www.sassoonfont.co.uk/fonts/sas/pri_lit_dev_wrtng_005501.pdf
Ditman, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2007). The contributions of lexico-semantic and discourse information to the resolution of ambiguous categorical anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 793-827.
Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of
antecedent typicality and distance. Language and Speech, 33(2), 103-119.
Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of Pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 32(2), 247-255. doi:10.1080/14640748008401161
Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration
during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 75-87.
Ehrlich, K. (1980). Comprehension of pronouns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 32(2), 247-255.
Ehrlich, M. F., & Remond, M. (1997). Skilled and less skilled comprehenders: French
children's processing of anaphoric devices in written texts. British Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 291-309.
Esaulova, Y., & Von Stockhausen, L. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a
prominence feature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1356).
doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01356
Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2009). The influence of only and even
on online semantic interpretation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(4),
678-683. doi:10.3758/pbr.16.4.678
Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of we in university lectures: reference and function.
English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), 45-66.
Francis, W. N., Kucera, H., Mackie, A. W. (1982). Frequency analysis of English
usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Frith, U. (1989). A new look at language and communication in autism. British
Journal of Disorder of Communication, 24, 123-150.
Fukumura, K., & Van Gompel, R. P. (2010). Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do
people take into account likelihood of reference？ Journal of Memory and
Language, 62(1), 52-66.
Fukumura, K., & van Gompel, R. P. (2015). Effects of order of mention and
grammatical role on anaphor resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 501.
Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. New York,
NY: Psychology Press.
Garnham, A., Gabriel, U., Sarrasin, O., Gygax, P., &Oakhill, J.(2012). Gender representation in different languages and grammatical marking on pronouns: When beautivians, musicians, and mechanics reman men. Discourse Processes, 49(6), 481-255. Doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.688184
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., & Cruttenden, H. (1992). The role of implicit causality and
gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns. Language and Cognitive Processes,
7(3-4), 231-255.
Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic inquiry,
5(3), 459-464.
Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974). Factors influencing assignment of
pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3(3), 227-243.
Gelormini-Lezama, C., & Almor, A. (2011). Repeated names, overt pronouns, and
null pronouns in Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(3), 437-454.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1989). Mechanisms that improve referential access. Cognition,
32(2), 99.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Foertsch, J. A. (1999). Three models of discourse
comprehension. Language processing, 283-300.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1988). Accessing sentence participants: The
advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(6), 699.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing
clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of
clause recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 735-755.
Gordon, P. C., & Chan, D. (1995). Pronouns, passives, and discourse coherence.
Journal of Memory and Language, 34(2), 216.
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the
centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive science, 17(3), 311-347.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Foster, K. L. (2000). Language comprehension and
probe-list memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 26(3), 766.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of
reference and the structure of language: An analysis of complex noun phrases.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 353-379.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing Inferences During
Narrative Text Comprehension. Psychological Rewiew, 101(3), 371-395.
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the
order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg(Ed.). Universals of language
(73-113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Greene, S. B., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse
models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
18(2), 266.
Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohension in English. London,UK: Longman.
Henrik Singmann, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall, Frederik Aust and Mattan S. Ben-
Shachar (2021). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. R package version
0.28-1. Available online:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afex
Hickmann, M., & Hendriks, H. (1999). Cohesion and anaphora in children's
narratives: A comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese.
Journal of child language, 26(2), 419-452.
Hirst, G. (1981). Anaphora in natural language understanding. Berlin, Germany:
Springer-Verlog.
Hirst, W., & Brill, G. A. (1980). Contextual aspects of pronoun assignment. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(2), 168-175.
Jäger, L. A., Benz, L., Roeser, J., Dillon, B. W., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Teasing apart
retrieval and encoding interference in the processing of anaphors. Frontiers in
Psychology, 6, 506.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language,
inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P., & Hyönä, J. (2017). The interplay of implicit
causality, structural heuristics, and anaphor type in ambiguous pronoun
resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46(3), 525-550.
Järvikivi, J., van Gompel, R. P., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2005). Ambiguous pronoun
resolution: Contrasting the first-mention and subject-preference accounts.
Psychological Science, 16(4), 260-264.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language
comprehension. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Kail, M., & Hickmann, M. (1992). French children's ability to introduce referents in
narratives as a function of mutual knowledge. First Language, 12(34), 73-94.
doi:10.1177/014272379201203405
Kim, S.-I., & Lee, J.-H. (1995). The effect of syntatic and pragmatic Constraints on
Sentential Representaition and Memory Accessibility. Korean Journal of
Cognitive Science, 6(2), 97-116.
Kim, S.-i., Lee, J.-h., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2004). The advantage of first mention in
Korean the temporal contributions of syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(6), 475-491.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY:
Cambridge university press.
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and
production. Psychological review, 85(5), 363.
Koornneef, A., Dotlačil, J., van den Broek, P., & Sanders, T. (2016). The influence of
linguistic and cognitive factors on the time course of verb-based implicit
causality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 455-481.
Koornneef, A. W., & Van Berkum, J. J. (2006). On the use of verb-based implicit
causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye
tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 445-465.
Lee, Y., Lee, H., & Gordon, P. C. (2007). Linguistic complexity and information
structure in Korean: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. Cognition,
104(3), 495-534.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference
grammar. Berkeley,CA: University of California Press.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1984). Third person pronouns in zero-anaphora in
Chinese discourse. In T. Givon(Ed.), Discourse and syntax(pp.311-335). New　
York, NY: Academic Press.
Long, D. L., & De Ley, L. J. J. o. M. (2000). Implicit causality and discourse focus:
The interaction of text and reader characteristics in pronoun resolution. Journal
of Memory and Language, 42(4), 545-570.
MacDonald, M. C., & MacWhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation
from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(4), 469-492.
Mandler, J. M., & Goodman, M. S. (1982). On the psychological validity of story
structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 21(5), 507.
Marslenwilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., & Koster, C. (1993). Integrative Processes in
Utterance Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(5), 647-666.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1033
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University
Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York,
NY: Cambridge university press.
McDonald, J. L., & MacWhinney, B. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution:
Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language,
34(4), 543-566.
McGee, A., & Johnson, H. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less
skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 49-59.
McKoon, G., Greene, S. B., & Ratcliff, R. (1993). Discourse models, pronoun
resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1040-1052.
Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1999). Representations and processes in the production of
pronouns: Some perspectives from Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language,
41(2), 281-301.
Millogo, V. E. (2005). The use of anaphoric pronouns by French children in narrative:
Evidence from constrained text production. Journal of child language, 32(2),
439-461.
Nation, K., Clarke, P., Wright, B., & Williams, C. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in
children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental
Disorders, 36, 911-919.
Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1986). Pronoun resolution in skilled and less-skilled
comprehenders: Effects of memory load and inferential complexity. Language
and Speech, 29(1), 25-37.
Qiu, L., Swaab, T. Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, S. (2012). The role of gender information
in pronoun resolution: Evidence from Chinese. PloS one, 7(5), e36156.
Reali, C., Esaulova, Y., Öttl, A., & von Stockhausen, L. (2015). Role descriptions
induce gender mismatch effects in eye movements during reading. Frontiers in
Psychology, 6, 1-13.
Rickheit, G., Schnotz, W., & Strohner, H. (1985). The concept of inference in
discourse comprehension. Advances in Psychology , 29,3-49.
Russell V. Lenth (2021). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares
Means. R package version 1.5.5-1. Available on line: https://CRAN.R-
project.org/package=emmeans
Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how？: Questions of
immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 4(3-4), SI235-SI262. doi:10.1080/01690968908406369
Sanford, A. J., & Lockhart, F. (1990). Description types and method of conjoining as
factors influencing plural anaphora: A continuation study of focus. Journal of
Semantics, 7(4), 365-378.
Sanford, A. J., Moar, K., & Garrod, S. C. (1988). Proper names as controllers of
discourse focus. Language and Speech, 31(1), 43-56.
Sedivy, J. (2014). Language in mind: An introduction to psycholinguistics.Sunderland,
MA: Sinauer Associates.
Shake, M. C., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. (2011). Age differences in resolving anaphoric
expressions during reading. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(6),
678-707.
Shillcock, R. (1982). The on-line resolution of pronominal anaphora. Language and
Speech, 25(4), 385-401.
Song, H. J., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old
children's interpretation of pronouns. Lingua,117(11), 1959-1987.
Spencer, M., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). The comprehension problems of children with
poor reading comprehension despite adequate decoding: A meta-analysis. Review
of Educational Research, 88(3), 366-400.
Stevenson, R. J., & Vitkovitch, M. (1986). The Comprehension of Anaphoric
Relations. Language and Speech, 29(4), 335-360.
doi:10.1177/002383098602900403
Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). The time course of the
influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts.
Journal of Memory and Language, 42(3), 423-443.
Su, J. J., Molinaro, N., Gillon-Dowens, M., Tsai, P. S., Wu, D. H., & Carreiras, M.
(2016). When “he” can also be “she”: An ERP study of reflexive pronoun
resolution in written mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 151.
Sun, C. F., & Givón, T. (1985). On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin
Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language, 329-351.
Trabasso, T., van ven Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of
narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612-630.
Warren, P. (2012). Introducing psycholinguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Watson, L. R. (1985). The TEACCH communication curriculum. In E. Schopler & G.
B. Mesibov (eds.): Communication problems in autism (pp.187-206). N.Y.:
Plenum Press
Xu, X., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. (2013). Processing biological gender and number
information during Chinese pronoun resolution: ERP evidence for functional
differentiation. Brain and Cognition, 81(2), 223-236.
Xu, X., & Zhou, X. (2016). Topic shift impairs pronoun resolution during sentence
comprehension: Evidence from event‐related potentials. Psychophysiology,
53(2), 129-142.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Wu, J. T. (1999). Comprehension of
referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5-6),
715-743.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (2001). The
processing of coreference for reduced expressions in discourse integration.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 21-35.
Yeh, C. L., & Chen, Y. C. (2007). Zero Anaphora Resolution in Chinese with Shallow
Parsing. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 17(1), 41-56.
Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and
less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79(2), 173-186.
Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension: An
experimental investigation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.