:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:管理誘因對盈餘操縱的影響:預算寬列和創新績效的外溢效果
作者:蔡明修
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:財務金融技術學系
指導教授:鄭國枝
吳明政
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2021
主題關鍵詞:管理誘因盈餘操縱預算寬列創新績效中介效果Managerial IncentivesEarnings ManipulationBudget SlackInnovation PerformanceIntermediary Effect
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本研究目的乃從兩方面探討︰
(一)管理誘因對盈餘操縱的影響。(二)本研究考量管理誘因所造成的盈餘操縱是否外溢出預算寬列減少及創新績效增加之意想不到的效果。基於上述研究背景及目的,本研究建構原創性模式,並論述模式內關係、回顧相關文獻及發展研究假說於後。
本研究以相關文獻為基礎編製調查問卷。採用網路問卷調查法,樣本母群體包括兩大來源︰(一)研究者所參與社團相關人脈中之上市公司、上櫃公司、興櫃公司與中小企業公司,以及(二)台灣國際四大聯合會計師事務所審計簽證之國內上市公司、上櫃公司。研究對象為各個公司之企業負責人及各部門主管人員。
本研究共發出360份網路問卷,回收有效問卷185份,回收率約51.38%。所取得資料應用SPSS統計套裝軟體進行相關分析、信度分析、因素分析、簡單廻歸分析及調節複廻歸分析後獲得以下結論:
一、管理誘因與盈餘操縱呈正相關之假說不成立。
二、管理誘因與創新績效呈正相關之假說成立。
三、管理誘因與預算寬列呈負相關之假說不成立。
四、預算寬列與創新績效呈負相關之假說不成立。
五、盈餘操縱與創新績效呈正相關之假說不成立。
六、盈餘操縱與預算寬列呈負相關之假說不成立。
七、盈餘操縱於管理誘因與創新績效之間具中介效果之假說不成立。
八、預算寬列於管理誘因與創新績效之間具中介效果之假說不成立。
依據實證結果,分析管理誘因對盈餘操縱的影響:預算寬列和創新績效的外溢效果,及提出未來研究之建議。
In recent years, the research on innovation performance has mostly focused on how to motivate managers to achieve the goal of sustainable business. Although most of the previous literature believes that managerial incentives are directly helpful to innovation performance, there is not much evidence in the literature that managerial incentives are likely to trigger the dysfunctional behavior of earnings manipulation and budget slack, which will adversely affect innovation performance.
This research adopts the online questionnaire survey method, and the sample population includes two sources: one is the influence of managerial incentives on earnings manipulation; second of this study considers whether the earnings manipulation caused by managerial incentives is the unexpected effect of the reduction of the budget slack and the increase of innovation performance. Based on the above research background and purpose, this research constructs an original model, and discusses the relationships within the model, reviews relevant literature, and develops research hypotheses later.
This study is based on relevant literature to compile a questionnaire. Using the online questionnaire survey method, the parent group includes two sources: (1)Listed companies, OTC companies, Xing OTC companies, and small and medium-sized enterprises in the relevant connections of the associations the researcher participates in, and (2)The big 4 accounting firm joint accountants Domestic listed companies and OTC companies that have been audited by the firm. The research objects are the heads of companies and the heads of departments of various companies.
A total of 360 online questionnaires were sent out in this study, and 185 valid questionnaires were returned, with a return rate of 51.38%. After the data obtained is used SPSS statistical package software for correlation analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, simple regression analysis, and adjustment regression analysis, the following conclusions are obtained:
1.The hypothesis that managerial incentives are positively
correlated with earnings manipulation cannot be established.
2.The hypothesis that managerial incentives and innovation
performance are positively correlated is established.
3.The hypothesis that participation and managerial incentives are negatively correlated with budget allowances cannot be established.
4.The hypothesis that the budget slack is negatively correlated with innovation performance cannot be established.
5.The hypothesis that earnings manipulation and innovation
performance are positively correlated cannot be established.
6.The hypothesis that earnings manipulation and budget lenient are negatively correlated cannot be established.
7.The hypothesis that earnings manipulation has an intermediary effect between of the managerial incentives and innovation performance cannot be established.
8.The hypothesis that budget slack has an intermediary effect between managerial incentives and innovation performance cannot be established.
Based on the empirical results, analyze the impact of managerial Incentives on earnings manipulation as follows: the spillover effects of budget slack and innovation performance, and put forward recommendations for future research.
參考文獻

一﹑中文部份:

陳樹 (2002)。我國企業盈餘操縱問題之誘因、影響與因應對策,當代會計,第三卷第二期:頁 232。

陳志忠﹑張淑昭﹑王素玲 (2006)。朝陽商管評論,第五卷第二期,頁 26。

鄭丁旺 (2002)。未雨綢繆健全證券市場,會計研究月刊,第201期:頁 11。

二﹑英文部份:

Abernethy, M. A., Bouwens, J., & Kroos, P. (2017). Organization identity and earnings manipulation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58(C), 1-14.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino CA: Multivariate Software.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

Boivie, S., Lange, D., McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2011). Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identity on agency costs. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 551-576.

Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the Natural of Organizational Effectiveness, San Francisco: Jossey, Bass.

Carmines, E., & McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures in Bohmstedt, G. and Borgatta, E. (eds.), Social measurement: Current issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 65-115.

Cheng, Q., & Warfield, T. D. (2005). Equity incentives and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 441-476.

Church, B. K., Hannan, R. L., & Kuang, X. (2012). Shared interest and honesty in budget reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(3), 155-167.

Cooper, R. G. (1985). Industrial firm’s new product strategies, Journal of Business Research, 13, 107-121.

Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235-250.

Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401.

Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2013). Earnings quality: Evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2), 1-33.

Dunk, A. S. (1993). The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 400-410.

Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 255-307.

Fisher, J. G., Maines, L. A., Peffer, S. A., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). Using budgets for performance evaluation: Effects of resource allocation and horizontal information asymmetry on budget proposals, budget slack, and performance. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 847–865.

Fisher, J., Frederickson, J. R., & Peffer, S. A. (2002). The effect of information asymmetry on negotiated budgets: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 27-43.

Fletcher, C., & Williams, R. (1996). Performance management, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. British Journal of Management, 7, 169-179.

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(1), 115-134.

Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1), 3-73.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (2012). The earnings management game: It's time to stop it. Working paper. Harvard Business School and University of Southern California.

Khandwalla, P. (1972). The effect of different types of competition on the use of management controls. Journal of Accounting Research, 10(2), 275-285.

Kren, L. (1992). Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The Impact of information and environmental volatility. The Accounting Review, 67(3), 511-526.

MacKinnon, D. P. Warsi, G., & Dwyer, J. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41-62.

MacKinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17, 144-158.

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identity. Journal of Organization Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.

McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.

Nouri, H., & Parker, R.J. (1996). The effect of organizational commitment on the relation between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 74-90.

Onsi, M. (1973). Factor Analysis of Behavioral Variables Affecting Budgetary Slack. The Accounting Review. 48,538-48.

Schiff, M. and A.Y. Lewin. (1970). The Impact of People on Bedgets. The Accounting Review. 45,259-68.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). California: Brooks & Cole.

Van der Stede, W.A. (2000). The relationship between two consequences of budgetary controls: Budgetary slack creation and managerial short-term orientation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 609-622.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE