臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：應用AHP-TLF-RMCGP處理機場地勤設備購買最適化決策模型之研究
作者：陶幼卓
作者(外文)：Tao, Yu-Jwo
校院名稱：國立臺灣海洋大學
系所名稱：航運管理學系
指導教授：李選士
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2021
主題關鍵詞：設備購買決策；層級分析法；田口損失函數；模糊線性規劃式；修正多選擇目標規劃式；Equipment purchase decision；Analytic hierarchy process；Taguchi loss function；Fuzzy linear programming；Revised multi-choice goal programming
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
選擇機場地勤服務公司設備供應商是一件非常重要且複雜的問題，其能提供機場地勤公司日常運營的安全保證。主要研究目的為幫助臺灣機場地勤服務公司採購經理人員能使用簡單的評估模式以確定最合適的機場地勤服務設備供應商，及求解機場設備購買最適量。研究方法是整合層級分析法、模糊線性規劃式、田口損失函數暨修正多選擇目標規劃式等決策模型來幫助機場地勤服務公司採購經理人員選擇最適合的機場地勤服務設備供應商，使用田口損失函數權重加上修正多選擇目標規劃式以提供機場設備購買最適量。最後，經由實例驗證分析可得知使用整合層次分析法及田口損失函數暨修正多選擇目標規劃式決策模型可得到最適合設備供應商是S3，及設備供應商S2可提供最適供應量推送30台，拉式35台。本文主要貢獻是比較AHP、AHP-FLP和AHP-TLF-RMCGP機場設備購買決策模型幫助機場公司採購經理人員解決設備供應商選擇問題。此模型可以使航空地勤業採購經理人員在品質管理、維修保養、產品保證、技術轉讓、合作名聲以及合理價格的考慮下做明確決策。此採購量最適化模式貢獻如下：其一允許決策者設置與設備供應商標準相關多個需求水準。亦指修正多選擇目標規劃式的優點是可以讓決策者同時滿足多選項目標水準達成，意即同時達到滿意的水準，用鎖定目標值的大小，來達到滿意水準。其二有助於解決不確定因素問題。此外，AHP-TLF-RMCGP模型可能有利於解決不同的多準則決策問題，例如模糊不確定數據決策的問題。另外，本論文研究將可以提供相關地勤公司同業來參考。
關鍵詞：設備購買決策、層級分析法、田口損失函數、模糊線性規劃式、修正多選擇目標規劃式
Choosing an equipment supplier for an airport ground handling company is a very important and complex issue, which can provide security guarantees for the daily operations of the airport ground handling company. The main purpose of the research is to help the purchasing managers of Taiwan Airport Ground Service Company to use a simple evaluation model to determine the most suitable airport ground service equipment supplier, and to find the most appropriate amount of airport equipment purchase. The research method is to integrate decision models such as Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy linear programming (FLP), Taguchi loss function (TLF) and revised multi-choice goal programming (RMCGP) to help airport ground service company procurement managers choose the most suitable airport ground service equipment supplier, using Taguchi loss function weight plus the revised multi-choice goal programming to provide the most appropriate amount of airport equipment purchase. Finally, through the example verification and analysis, it can be known that using the integrated analytic hierarchy process and Taguchi loss function and the revised multi-choice goal programming decision model can be obtained that the most suitable supplier is S3, and supplier S2 can provide the most suitable supply to push 30 units and pull 35 units. The main contribution of this paper is to compare AHP, AHP-FLP and AHP-TLF-RMCGP airport equipment purchase decision models to help airport company purchasing managers solve the supplier selection problem. This model allows the aviation and ground handling industry procurement managers to make clear decisions in the consideration of quality management, maintenance, product assurance, technology transfer, reputation for cooperation, and reasonable prices. The contribution of this procurement optimization model is as follows: First, it allows decision makers to set multiple demand levels related to supplier standards. It also refers to the advantage of multi-choice goal planning that allows decision makers to meet the multi-choice goal level at the same time, which means to achieve a satisfactory level at the same time, and use the size of the target value to achieve the satisfactory level. The second is to help solve the problem of uncertain factors. In addition, the AHP-TLF-RMCGP model may be beneficial to solve different multi-criteria decision-making problems, such as fuzzy uncertain data decision-making problems. In addition, the research in this paper will provide reference for related ground handling companies.
Keywords: Equipment purchase decision, Analytic hierarchy process, Taguchi loss function, Fuzzy linear programming, Revised multi-choice goal programming
一、中文部分
1.王敏華（2011），「應用模糊層級分析法建構物流中心區位評選模式」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系博士論文。
2.李東明（2021），「多準則群體決策法在評選室內設計師之應用」，設計學報，第二十六卷，第一期，頁 39-57。
3.李建輝（2013），「應用分析層級程序法探討社區安寧照護服務品質關鍵因素-以臺大醫院金山分院為例」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
4.李啟仲（2014），國際航空運輸協會 「空側安全與運作管理」課程報告，出國報告（出國類別：實習），交通部民用航空局。
5.余豐榮、 廖奕雯（2015），「田口損失函數與層級分析法應用於學校午餐供應商評選模式」，科學與工程技術期刊 ，第十一卷， 第二期，頁17-24。
6.林信宏、張博涵（2016），機場機坪管理，出國報告（出國類別：實習），交通部民用航空局。
7.航空站空側設施及作業認證辦法，交通部，上網日期：2021年7月17日，檢自https://tinyurl.com/ezb28dwj。
8.航空站空側作業管理手冊，交通部民用航空局，上網日期：2021年7月17日，檢自https://tinyurl.com/hfy4wpzv。
9.張紹勳（2012），模糊多準則評估法及統計，臺北：五南圖書。
10.畢威寧（2005），「結合AHP與TOPSIS法於供應商效評估之研究」，科學與工程技術期刊，第一卷，第一期，頁75-83。
11.曹慧玲（2013），「應用分析層級程序法探討區公所服務品質關鍵因素-以基隆市某區公所為例」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
12.彭艷婷（2019），「應用多準則決策技術於機場地勤服務設備供應商之選擇問題建構」，國立中央大學企業管理學系博士論文。
13.鄭春生（2019），品質管理：現代化觀念與實務應用， 臺北：三民書局。
14.鄭舒安（2018），「應用層級分析法探討組合型航空公司貨機機型評選」，國立交通大學管理學院（運輸物流學程）碩士論文。
15.潘美桂（2010），「應用分析層級程序法探討影響使用電信費電子帳單服務之因素」，國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
16.鄧振源、曾國雄（1989），「層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上） 」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第六期，頁13707-13724。
17.鄧振源、曾國雄（1989），「層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（下） 」，中國統計學報，第二十七卷，第七期，頁13767-13870。
18.韓文銘、 廖珮妏（2012），「整合田口損失函數與層級分析法於軟體產品使用者品質評估之應用」，品質學報，第十九卷，第二期，頁97-116。
19.蘇朝墩（2013），品質工程：線外方法與應用，新北市：前程文化事業有限公司。

二、英文部分
1.AI-Harbi, K.M. (2001), “Application of the AHP in project management,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 19-27.
2.AI Khalil, M. I. (2002), “Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 469-474.
3.Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H. and O’Brien, C. (2006), “Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for the supplier selection in a supply chain,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 394-407.
4.Ayağ, Z. (2002), “An analytic-hierarchy-process based simulation model for implementation and analysis of computer-aided systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40, No. 13, pp.3053-3073.
5.Ayağ, Z. and Özdemir, R.G. (2006), “A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 17, pp. 179-190.
6.Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1970), “Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment,” Management Science, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp.141-164.
7.Besterfield, D.H., Besterfield-Michna, C., Besterfield, G.H. and Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2003), Total Quality Management, 3rd ed, USA N.J. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc.
8.Bhutta, K.S. and Huq, F. (2002), “Supplier selection problem: A comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches,” Supply Chain Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 126-135.
9.Bozdağ, C.E., Kahraman, C. and Ruan, D. (2003), “Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 51, No.1, pp. 13-29.
10.Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Fuzzy hierarchical analysis,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 233-247.
11.Chan, F.T.S., Chan, H.K., Lau, H.C.W. and Ip, R.W.L. (2006), “An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry,” Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 636-661.
12.Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K., Lau, H.C.W. and Choy, K.L. (2008), “Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 14, pp. 3825-3857.
13.Chang, D.Y. (1996), “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 649-655.
14.Chang, C.T. (2007), “Multi-choice goal programming,” Omega, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 389-396.
15.Chang, C.T. (2008), “Revised multi-choice goal programming,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 2587-2595.
16.Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1957), “Management Model and Industrial Application of Linear Programming,” Management Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 1-113.
17.Chen, C.B. and Klein, C.M. (1997), “An efficient approach to solving fuzzy MADM problems,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 88, No.1, pp. 51-67.
18.Chen, M.F. and Tzeng, G.H. (2004), “Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 40, No. 13, pp. 1473-1490.
19.Dağdeviren, M. and Yüksel, I. (2008), “Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management,” Information Sciences, Vol. 178, No. 6, pp. 1717-1733.
20.Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S. and Kılınç, N. (2008), “Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 8143-8151.
21.Dulmin, R. and Mininno, V. (2003), “Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method,” Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 177-187.
22.Ealey, L.A. (1988), Quality by Design: Taguchi Methods and US Industry, USA I.N.: ASI Press: Bloomington.
23.Fashoto, S.G., Akinnuwesi, B., Owolabi, O. and Adelekan, D. (2016), “Decision support model for supplier selection in healthcare service delivery using analytical hierarchy process and artificial neural network,” African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 10, No.9, pp. 209-232.
24.Fong, S.W. and Choi, S.K.Y. (2000), “Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process,” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 547-557.
25.Fuhr, J. and Beckers, T. (2006), “Vertical governance between airlines and airport: A transaction cost analysis,” Review of Network Economics, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 386-412.
26.Goztepe, K. and Kahraman, C. (2015), “A new approach to military decision making process:Suggestions from MCDM point of view,” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Military and Security Studies, İstanbul, Turkey, Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 118-122.
27.Haleh, H. and Hamidi, A. (2011), “A fuzzy MCDM model for allocating orders to suppliers in a supply chain under uncertainty over a multi-period time horizon,” Expert Systems with Applications Exp, Vol. 38, No. 8, pp. 9076-9083.
28.Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981), Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29.Ignizio, J.P. (1985), Introduction to Linear Goal Programming, USA C.A.: Sage.
30.Inan, T. (2018), “Performance measurement system (PSM) and balanced scorecard (BSC) strategies used in the process related with ramp handling services of ground handling management,” Journal of Aviation, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
31.Ji, J. and Chen, K. (2021), Evaluation of Integrated Energy System in Airports Based on Comprehensive Weighting Method, International Conference on Advances in Energy, Environment and Chemical Science (AEECS 2021), E3S Web Conf, Vol. 245, 2021. DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202124501022 Published online 24 March 2021.
32.Lai, Y.J. and Hawang, C.L. (1994), Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making, Methods and Applications; Germany Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
33.Lee, S.M. (1972), Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, USA P.A.: Auerbach.
34.Lee, Z.Y., Chu, M.T., Wang, Y.T. and Chen, K.J. (2020), Industry performance appraisal using improved MCDM for next generation of Taiwan. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 13, pp. 5290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135290.
35.Liao, C.N. and Kao, H.P. (2010), “Supplier selection model using Taguchi loss function, analytical hierarchy process and multi-choice goal programming,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 571-577.
36.Liao, C.N. and Kao, H.P. (2011), “An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, No. 9, pp. 10803-10811.
37.Magdalena, R. (2012), “Supplier selection for food industry:A combination of taguchi loss function and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process,” Asian Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 13-22.
38.Miller, G. A. (1956), “ The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information”, Psychological Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 81-97.
39.Mohanty, B.K. and Singh, N. (1994), “Fuzzy relational equations in analytical hierarchy process,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp.11-19.
40.Mon, D.L., Cheng, C.H. and Lin, J.C. (1994), “Evaluation weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 127-134.
41.Monczka, R.M., Nichols, E.L., Jr. and Callahan, T.J. (1992), “Value of supplier information in the decision process,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 20-30.
42.Mortezaa, Z., Rezab, F.M., Seddiqc, M.M., Shararehd, P. and Jamale, G. (2016), “Selection of the optimal tourism site using the ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS in the framework of Integrated Coastal Zone Management: A case of Qeshm Island,” Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol.130, pp. 179-187.
43.Ordoobadi, S.M. (2010), “Application of AHP and Taguchi loss functions in supply chain,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 110, No. 8, pp. 1251-1269.
44.Ordoobadi, S.M. (2013), “Application of AHP and Taguchi loss functions in evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologies,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 67, No. 9, pp. 2593-2605.
45.Pitchipoo, P., Venkumar, S. and Rajakarunakaran, K.M. (2011), “Modelling and development of decision model for supplier selection in process industry,” International Journal of Computer Aided Engineering and Technology , Vol. 3, No.5-6, pp. 504-516.
46.Quigley, C. and McNamara, C. (1992), “Evaluating product quality: An application of the Taguchi quality loss concept,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 19-25.
47.Romero, C. (2001), Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach, Omege, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 563-71.
48.Saaty, T.L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York : McGraw-Hill.
49.Saaty, T.L. (1988), The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, USA P.A. RWS: Pittsburgh.
50.Saaty, T.L. (2008), “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” International Journal of Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 19, pp. 83-98.
51.Sakawa, M. (1993), Fuzzy Sets and Interactive Multiobjective Optimization, New York: Plenum.
52.Sakib, N. (2014), “Identifying Optimum Supply Unit Using an Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP Approach in Apparel Industry Sector,” Industrial Engineering & Management, Vol. 3, No. 5 : 143. doi: 10.4172/2169-0316.1000143.
53.Sarkis, J. and Talluri, S. (2002), “A model for strategic supplier selection,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 18-28.
54.Schmidberger, S., Bals, L., Hartmann, E. and Jahns, C. (2009), “Ground handling services at European hub airports: Development of a performance measurement system for benchmarking,” International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 104-116.
55.Schrage, L. (2002), LINGO Release 8.0; USA Chicago, IL. 60622: LINGO System Inc.
56.Sevkli, M., Lenny Koh, S.C., Zaim, S., Demirbag, M. and Tatoglu, E. (2008), “Hybrid analytical hierarchy process model for supplier selection,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108, No. 1, pp.122-142.
57.Shen, C.W., Peng, Y.T. and Tu, C.S. (2019), “Multi-criteria decision-making techniques for solving the airport ground handling service equipment vendor selection problem,” Sustainability , Vol. 11, No. 12, pp. 3466.
58.Shyur, H.J. and Shih, H.S. (2006), “A hybrid MCDM model for strategic vendor selection,” Mathematical and Computer modeling, Vol. 44, No. 7-8, pp. 749-761.
59.Taguchi, G. and Phadke, M.S. (1989), Quality Engineering through Design Optimization. Quality Control, Robust Design, and the Taguchi Method, Dehnad, K.( Ed.). USA M.A. Boston: Springer.
60.Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E. and Hsiang, T. (1989), Quality Engineering in Production System, USA New York: McGraw-Hill College.
61.Tamiz, M., Jones, D. and Romero, C. (1998), “Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the current state-of-the-art,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 111, No. 3, pp. 569-581.
62.Tsai, Chi-Mao., Lee, Hsuan-Shih. and Gan, Guo-Ya. (2021), “A New Fuzzy DEA Model for Solving the MCDM Problems in Supplier Selection," Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 1, Article 7.
63.Tiwari, R.N., Dharmahr, S. and Rao, J.R. (1987), “Fuzzy goal programming an additive model,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 27-34.
64.van Laarhoven, P.J.M. and Pedrycz, W. (1983), “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 11, No. 1-3, pp. 229-241.
65.Vargas, L. G. (1990), “An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications,” European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 2-8.
66.Vonderembse, M.A. and Tracey, M. (1999), “The impact of supplier selection criteria and supplier involvement on manufacturing performance,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 33-39.
67.Wang, T.C. and Chang, T.H. (2007), “Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 870-880.
68.Wang, J.J. and Yang, D.L. (2007), “Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing,” Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 34, No. 12, pp.3691-3700.
69.Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H. and Rüenauver, E. (1997), “Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 100, No.2, pp. 351-366.
70.Yoon, K. Paul. and Hwang, C.L. (1985), “Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: Part II. Multi-plant strategy and plant relocation,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 361-370.
71.Yoon, K. Paul. and Hwang, C.L. (1985), Multiple attribute decision making: an introduction, USA: SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
72.Zeleny, M. (1975), Multiple criteria decision making, Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
73.Zimmermann, H.J. (1978), “Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions,” Fuzzy Sets Syst, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-55.
74.Zimmermann, H.J. (2000), “An application-oriented view of modeling uncertainty,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 190-198.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1214（臺灣：1207，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67658743
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上