吳聲毅(2018)。STEM教育中的運算思維學習。科學研習，57(2)，2-3。
國家發展委員會(2018)。107-109年各重點產業人才新增需求推估結果。取自： https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/18/relfile/6037/29fb15c8-89d8-4c6f-9059-420971546cf0.pdf
Afini Normadhi, N. B., Shuib, L., Md Nasir, H. N., Bimba, A., Idris, N., & Balakrishnan, V. (2018). Identification of personal traits in adaptive learning environment: Systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 130, 168-190. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.005
Alyuz, N., Okur, E., Oktay, E., Genc, U., Aslan, S., Mete, S. E., & Esme, A. A. (2016). Semi-supervised model personalization for improved detection of learner’s emotional engagement. Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 100–107. doi:10.1145/2993148.2993166
Amir, E. S., Sumadyo, M., Sensuse, D. I., Sucahyo, Y. G., & Santoso, H. B. (2016). Automatic detection of learning styles in learning management systems by using literature-based method. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, 141–144. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.324
Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). From Scratch to “real” programming. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(4), 1-15. doi:10.1145/2677087
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Keating, T., Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2005). Using virtual reality computer models to support student understanding of astronomical concepts. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(4), 333-356.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London, England: Allen Lane.
Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. doi:10.1145/1929887.1929905
Bass, K. M., Hu Dahl, I., & Panahandeh, S. (2016). Designing the game: How a project-based media production program approaches STEAM career readiness for underrepresented young adults. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 1009-1024. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9631-7
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effect of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12, 23-37.
Berland, M., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Comparing virtual and physical robotics environments for supporting complex systems and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 628-647. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9552-x
Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145-157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED336049.pdf
Bosch, N., D'Mello, S. K., Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Shute, V., Ventura, M., & Zhao, W. (2016a). Detecting student emotions in computer-enabled classrooms. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 4125-4129.
Bosch, N., D'Mello, S. K., Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R. S., & Shute, V., Ventura, M., & Zhao, W. (2016b). Using video to automatically detect learner affect in computer-enabled classrooms. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, 6(2), 1-26. doi:10.1145/2946837.
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-25.
Bryant, J., & Vorderer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Psychology of entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Burke, L. A., & Ray, R. (2008). Re-setting the concentration levels of students in higher education: An exploratory study. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 571-582.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. New York, NY: NSTA Press.
Cabada, R. Z., Estrada, M. L. B., Hernandez, F. G., Bustillos, R. O., & Reyes-Garcia, C. A. (2018). An affective and web 3.0-based learning environment for a programming language. Telematics and Informatics, 35(3), 611-628. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.03.005
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.
Chen, G., Shen, J., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., Huang, X., & Eltoukhy, M. (2017). Assessing elementary students’ computational thinking in everyday reasoning and robotics programming. Computers & Education, 109, 162-175. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.001
Chen, S. Y., Chang, C., Yang, T., & Wang, J. (2018). An investigation of the development of an animated e-book: A gender difference approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 28-36. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.018
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898–909. doi:10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6
Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Vision for a science nation: Responding to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Australia’s future. Retrieved from https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A78103
Corno, L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22, 14-22.
Cortina, K. S., Miller, K. F., McKenzie, R., & Epstein, E. (2015). Where low and high inference data converge: Validation of class assessment of mathematics instruction using mobile eye tracking with experts and novice teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 389–403.
Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240-249. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.006
Denning, P. J. (2007). Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33-39.
Devine, J., Finney, J., de Halleux, P., Moskal, M., Ball, T., & Hodges, S. (2019). Make code and codal: Intuitive and efficient embedded systems programming for education. Journal of Systems Architecture, 53, 19-30.
Dewey, J. (1997). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Heath & Co.
Dierking, L. D. (2010). A comprehensive approach to fostering the next generation of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education leaders. The New Educator, 6, 297-309. doi:10.1080/1547688X.2010.10399607
Ding, N., Bosker, R., & Harskamp, E. (2011). Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 56(2), 325-336. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.004
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban high school students’ IT/STEM learning: Findings from a collaborative inquiry- and design-based afterschool program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116-137. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9457-5
Durbrow, E. H., Schaefer, B. A., & Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Learning-related behaviours versus cognitive ability in the academic performance of vincentian children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 471-483.
Erickson, F. (2007). Ways of seeing video: Toward a phenomenology of viewing minimally edited footage. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 145-155). New York, NY: Routledge.
Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Falkner, N. (2014). The Australian digital technologies curriculum: Challenge and opportunity. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference, 3-12.
Farris, A. V., & Sengupta, P. (2016). Democratizing children’s computation: Learning computational science as aesthetic experience. Educational Theory, 66, 279-296. doi:10.1111/edth.12168
Feng, C. Y., & Chen, M. P. (2014). The effects of goal specificity and scaffolding on programming performance and self-regulation in game design. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 285-302. doi:10.1111/bjet.12022
Fine, C. (2010). Delusions of gender: How our minds, society, and neurosexism create difference. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
Fujii, K., Marian, P., Clark, D., Okamoto, Y., & Rekimoto, J. (2018). Sync class: Visualization system for in-class student synchronization. Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference, 1-8. doi:10.1145/3174910.3174927
Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2016). A brief introduction to TACCLE 3 — coding European project. Proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education, 288-295. doi:10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751876
Gerjets, P., Walter, C., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Zander, T. O. (2014). Cognitive state monitoring and the design of adaptive instruction in digital environments: Lessons learned from cognitive workload assessment using a passive brain-computer interface approach. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 385(8), 1-21. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00385
Geron, A. (2019). Hands-on machine learning with scikit-learn, keras, and tensorflow: Concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. New York, NY: O’Reilly Media.
González-Gómez, F., Guardiola, J., Rodríguez, Ó. M., & Alonso, M. Á. (2012). Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers & Education, 58(1), 283-290. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.017
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2000). Looking in classrooms. New York, NY: Longman.
Gouws, L. A., Bradshaw, K., & Wentworth, P. (2013). Computational thinking in educational activities: An evaluation of the educational game light-bot. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 10-11. doi:10.1145/2462476.2466518
Greiff, S., Molnár, G., Martin, R., Zimmermann, J., & Csapó, B. (2018). Students' exploration strategies in computer-simulated complex problem environments: A latent class approach. Computers & Education, 126, 248-263. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.013
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. doi:10.3102/0013189x12463051
Hämäläinen, R., Wever, B. D., Nissinen, K., & Cincinnato, S. (2019). What makes the difference – PIAAC as a resource for understanding the problem-solving skills of Europe's higher-education adults. Computers & Education, 129, 27-36. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.013
Heintz, F., Mannila, L., & Farnqvist, T. (2016). A review of models for introducing computational thinking, computer science and computing in K-12 education. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1-9. doi:10.1109/FIE.2016.7757410
Hornburg, C. B., Rieber, M. L., & Mcneil, N. M. (2017). An integrative data analysis of gender differences in children’s understanding of mathematical equivalence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 163, 140-150. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.002
Howse, J., & Minichino, J. (2020). Learning OpenCV 4 computer vision with python 3. New York, NY: Packt Publishing.
Hsu, T., Chang, S., & Hung, Y. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296-310. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.6.581
Joiner, R., Messer, D., Littleton, K., & Light, P. (1996). Gender, computer experience and computer-based problem solving. Computers & Education, 26(3), 179-187. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(96)00008-5
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 384-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kier, M. W., Blanchard, M. R., Osborne, J. W., & Albert, J. L. (2014). The development of the STEM career interest survey (STEM-CIS). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 461-481. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3
Kleinknecht, M., & Gröschner, A. (2016). Fostering preservice teachers' noticing with structured video feedback: Results of an online- and video-based intervention study. Teacher and Teacher Education, 59, 45-56. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.020
Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., Periathiruvaldi, S., Alexander, C., Mayes, G., & Magoun, D. (2012). Measurement of STEM dispositions in elementary school students. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1052-1059.
Kong, S. (2016). A framework of curriculum design for computational thinking development in K-12 education. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(4), 377-394. doi:10.1007/s40692-016-0076-z
Krumpe, T., Scharinger, C., Rosenstiel, W., Gerjets, P., & Spueler, M. (2018). Unity and diversity in working memory load: Evidence for the separability of the executive functions updating and inhibition using machine learning. Biological Psychology, 139, 163-172. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.09.008
Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2017). Behavioral patterns of elementary students and teachers in one-to-one robotics instruction. Computers & Education, 111, 31-43. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.002
Lachner, A., Jarodzka, H., & Nückles, M. (2016). What makes an expert teacher? Investigating teachers’ professional vision and discourse abilities. Instructional Science, 44(3), 197-203.
Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (2014). Handbook of research on science education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of china and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301-317. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
Lin, C. F., Hung, Y. H., Chang, R. I., & Hung, S. H. (2014). Developing a problem-solving learning system to assess the effects of different materials on learning performance and attitudes. Computers & Education, 77, 50-66. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.007
Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does LEGO training stimulate pupils’ ability to solve logical problems? Computers & Education, 49(4), 1097-1111. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008
Liu, H. P., Perera, S. M., & Klein, J. W. (2017). Using model-based learning to promote computational thinking education. In P. Rich, & C. B. Hodges (Eds), Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 153-172). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Liu, S. (2017). Relationship between the factors influencing online help-seeking and self-regulated learning among Taiwanese preservice teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 38-45. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.034
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907. doi:10.1002/sce.20441
Martínez-Miranda, J., Pérez-Espinosa, H., Espinosa-Curiel, I., Avila-George, H., & Rodríguez-Jacobo, J. (2018). Age-based differences in preferences and affective reactions towards a robot’s personality during interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 245-257. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.039
McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137-1164. doi:10.1002/tea.20377
Mefoh, P. C., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. C., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problem solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 47-52. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.03.002
Minogue, J., Madden, L., Bedward, J., Wiebe, E., & Carter, M. (2010). The cross-case analyses of elementary atudents’ engagement in the strands of science proficiency. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(5), 559-587. doi:10.1007/s10972-010-9195-y
Mu, S., Cui, M., Wang X. J., Qiao, J. X., & Tang D. M. (2019). Learners’ attention preferences of information in online learning: An empirical study based on eye-tracking. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(4). doi:10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0090
Naima, F., Monalisa, Suman, S., & Nayeem, S. (2016). A review on different approaches for human face recognition. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Technology and Science, 6(7), 1-5.
Ong, C., & Lai, J. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 816-829. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
Peterman, K., Kermish-Allen, R., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2016). Measuring student career interest within the context of technology-enhanced STEM projects: A cross-project comparison study based on the career interest questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 833-845. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9617-5
Poh, M., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 57(5), 1243-1252.
Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41.
Raca, M. (2015). Camera-based estimation of student’s attention in class. Retrieved from https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/212929
Raca, M., & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). System for assessing classroom attention. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 265-269. doi:10.1145/2460296.2460351
Raca, M., Tormey, R., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). Sleepers’ lag-study on motion and attention. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, 36-43. doi:10.1145/2567574.2567581
Reshma, P. A., Divya, K. V., Geethu, J., & Subair, T. B. (2017). A study of gender recognition from iris: A literature survey. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems, 132-135. doi:10.1109/ISS1.2017.8389306
Ritzhaupt, A. D., Pastore, R., Wang, J., & Davis, R. O. (2018). Effects of organizational pictures and modality as a feedback strategy on learner comprehension and satisfaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1069-1086.
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J., & Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678-691. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., Moreno-León, J., & Robles, G. (2018). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the computational thinking test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18, 47-58. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.004
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96, 411-427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007
Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016).Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141.
Sandanayake, T. C., & Madurapperuma, A. P. (2013). Computational model for affective e-Learning. Proceeding of the 2013 IEEE International Conference in MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education, 174-179. doi:10.1109/MITE.2013.6756329
Sewak, M., Karim, R., & Pujari, P. (2018). Practical convolutional neural networks. Birmingham, England: Packt Publishing.
Shen, C., Vasilyeva, M., & Laski, E. V. (2016). Here, but not there: Cross-national variability of gender effects in arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,146, 50-65. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.016
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. doi:10.1177/0022487108328155.
Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., & Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Computers & Education, 85, 49-58. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
Sysło, M. M., & Kwiatkowska, A. B. (2015). Introducing a new computer science curriculum for all school levels in Poland. In A. Brodnik & J. Vahrenhold (Eds.), Informatics in schools. curricula, competences, and competitions (pp. 141–154). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing .
Taub, R., Armoni, M., Bagno, E., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). The effect of computer science on physics learning in a computational science environment. Computers & Education, 87, 10-23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.013
Topalli, D., & Cagiltay, N. E. (2018). Improving programming skill in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch. Computers & Education, 120, 64-74. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.011
Turner, P. R., Levy, R., & Fowler, K. (2015). Collaboration in the mathematical sciences community on mathematical modeling across the curriculum. CHANCE, 28(4), 12-18.
Vasuki, J., & Priyadarshini, S. (2017). A study on basics of data mining, machine learning and big data. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5(2), 1302-1309. doi:10.15680/IJIRCCE.2017
Viola, P., & Jones, M. (2001). Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 511-518.
Viola, P., & Jones, M. (2004). Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 57(2), 137-154.
Wang, J., Antonenko, P., Celepkolu, M., Jimenez, Y., Fieldman, E., & Fieldman, A. (2018). Exploring relationships between eye tracking and traditional usability testing data. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(6), 483-494.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127-147. doi:10.1007/s1096-015-9581-5
Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., & Kawamoto, D. C. (2012). The fairy performance assessment. Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 388-393. doi:10.1145/2157136.2157200
Whitehill, J., Serpell, Z., Lin, Y., Foster, A., & Movellan, J. R. (2014). The faces of engagement: Automatic recognition of student engagement from facial expressions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 86-98. doi:10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2316163
Wilkerson-Jerde, M. H. (2014). Construction, categorization, and consensus: Student generated computational artifacts as a context for disciplinary reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(1), 99-121. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9327-0
Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Proceedings of 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing, 45-48. doi:10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536091
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-34. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wu, C. H., Tzeng, Y. L., & Huang, Y. M. (2014). Understanding the relationship between physiological signals and digital game-based learning outcome. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 81-97.
Yang, J. C., & Chen, S. Y. (2010). Effects of gender differences and spatial abilities within a digital pentominoes game. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1220-1233. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.019
Yurdugül, H., & Aşkar, P. (2013). Learning programming, problem solving and gender: A longitudinal study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 605-610.
Zaletelj, J. (2017). Estimation of students’ attention in the classroom from kinect features. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis, 178-181. doi:10.1109/ISPA.2017.8073599
Zaletelj, J., & Košir, A. (2017). Predicting students’ attention in the classroom from kinect facial and body features. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing, 80, 1-12. doi:10.1186/s13640-017-0228-8
Zhong, B., Wang, Q., & Chen, J. (2016). The impact of social factors on pair programming in a primary school. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 423-431. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.017
Zurmehly, J., & Leadingham, C. (2008). Exploring student response systems in nursing education. Computers Informatics Nursing, 26(5), 265-270.