1.王保進，套裝程式與資料分析，台北：高等教育出版社，2004，第35-55頁。
2.王鴻祥、洪瑞璘，「文創商品的隱喻設計模式」，設計學報，第十六卷，第四期，2011。
3.吳明隆，SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計(第三版) ，台北：易習圖書，2013。
4.吳致潔，創造力、認知型態與研究績效之關係，碩士論文，靜宜大學管理科學所，台中，2004。
5.邱皓政，量化研究與統計分析，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2006。
6.邵志怡，數位版權管理對電子書消費者態度一致性影響之研究，台北：致知學術，2013。
7.金星明譯，歇斯底里症研究（原作者：Freud S.），台北：知書房，2000（原著出版年：1895年）。
8.洪偉肯、陳玲鈴，「如何量測產品的矛盾語意」，設計學報，第十五卷，第四期，2010，第41-58頁。
9.胡幼慧、姚美華，「一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集. 資料、登錄與分析？」，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：台灣巨流圖書公司，1996，。
10.徐宗國，「紮根理論研究法——淵源、原則、技術與涵義」，質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例，台北：台灣巨流圖書公司，1996。
11.馬嘉陽、陳圳卿，「功能性過場動畫與情緒變化之關係探討」，設計學報，第二十四卷，第一期，2019，第1-16頁。
12.張春興，心理學原理，台北：東華書局股份有限公司，2003。
13.陳正昌，SPSS與統計分析，台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司，2013。
14.陳炫助，感性工學之綠色創新設計模式，博士論文，國立雲林科技大學，雲林縣，2016。
15.陳榮政譯，基礎社會研究法：質化與量化取向（原作者：W. Lawrence Neuman），台北：學富文化事業有限公司，2014。
16.游萬來，葉博雄，高曰菖，「產品意象及其表徵設計的研究以收音機為例」，設計學報，第二卷，第一期，1997，第31-45頁。
17.黃友玫譯，不為設計而設計等於最好的設計—生態學的設計論 （原作者：後藤武、佐佐木正人、深澤直人），台北：碁峰資訊，2008（原著出版年：2004）。
18.傳粹馨，「影響積差相關係數於α信度係數之因素」，教育學刊，第十四卷，1998，第193-206頁。
19.鄭仕弘，動作語意式產品之延滯性情感研究，博士論文，國立交通大學，新竹市，2015。
20.蕭瑞麟，不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡（第5版），台北：五南，2020。
21.Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E., “Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive ab-sorption and beliefs about information technology usage,” MIS quarterly, Vol.24, No.4, 2000, pp.665-694.
22.Alvre, Piret., Gouveia, Luis Borges., and Sousa, Sonia., “The impact of interface an-imations on the user experience: directing customer’s attention in online shopping sites,” UFP Research Days Proceedings, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 2017, pp. 1−17,
23.Anderson, R. C., and R. White., Confessions of a Radical Industrialist: Profits, Peo-ple, Purpose – Doing Business by Respecting the Earth, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2009.
24.Andreas, K., Tsiatsos, T., Terzidou, T., and Pomportsis, A., “Fostering collaborative learning in Second Life: Metaphors and affordances,” Computers & Education, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2010, pp. 603-615.
25.Ashbrook, D. L., Enabling mobile microinteractions, Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.
26.Atkinson, J.M., Garner, H.C., Gilmour, W.H., et al., “The introduction and evaluation of Community Care Orders,” Journal of Mental Health, Vol.11, No.4, 2002, pp.417-429.
27.Averill, J. R., “Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress,” Psychological bulletin, Vol. 80, No. 4., 1973.
28.Bahn, S., Lee, C., Nam, C. S., and Yun, M. H., “Incorporating affective customer needs for luxuriousness into product design attributes,” Human Factors and Ergo-nomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Vol.19, No.2, 2009, pp.105-127.
29.Basten, F., Ham, J., Midden, C., Gamberini, L., and Spagnolli, A., “Does trigger lo-cation matter? The influence of localization and motivation on the persuasiveness of mobile purchase recommendations,” In International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 121-132.
30.Behance, 2020 Design Trends, Behance, 2019，取自：https://www.behance.net/gallery/86124977/2020-Design-Trends2019
31.Behance, 2021 Design Trends, 2020，取自：https://www.behance.net/gallery/107015729/2021-Design-Trends
32.Behrens, Roy R. "Art, design and gestalt theory." Leonardo, Vol.31, No.4, 1998, pp. 299-303.
33.Betz, Sonya, and Robyn Hall., "Self-archiving with ease in an institutional repository: microinteractions and the user experience," Information Technology and Libraries, Vol.34, 2015, pp.43-58.
34.Blackler, A., Popovic, V., and Mahar, D., “Designing for Intuitive Use of Products. An Investigation,” In Journal of the Asian Design International Conference, Vol. 1, 6th Asian Design International Conference, 2003, pp. 1-16.
35.Bollini, L., “Beautiful interfaces. From user experience to user interface design,” The Design Journal, Vol.20, No.1, 2017, pp.89-101.
36.Breckler, Steven J., “A comparison of numerical indexes for measuring attitude am-bivalence,” Educational and psychological measurement, Vol.54, No.2, 1994, pp.350-365.
37.Britton, A., Setchi, R., and Marsh, A., “Intuitive interaction with multifunctional mo-bile interfaces,” Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Scienc-es, Vol.25, No.2, 2013, pp.187-196.
38.Bryman, A., and Cramer, D., Quantitative data analysis with SPSS for Windows: A guide for social scientists, London: Routledge, 1997.
39.Buck, R., Khan, M., Fagan, M., and Coman, E., “The user affective experience scale: a measure of emotions anticipated in response to pop-up computer warn-ings,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, Vol.34, No.1, 2018, pp.25-34.
40.Burlamaqui, L., and Dong, A., “Affordances: Bringing them out of the woods,” Interactions, Vol.23, No.4, 2016, pp.80-82.
41.Burmistrov, I., Zlokazova, T., Izmalkova, A., and Leonova, A., “Flat design vs tradi-tional design: Comparative experimental study,” In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 106-114.
42.Carroll, J. M., Mack, R. L., and Kellogg, W. A., “Interface metaphors and user inter-face design,” In Handbook of human-computer interaction, North-Holland, 1988, pp. 67-85.
43.Chang, B. W., and Ungar, D., “Animation: from cartoons to the user interface,” In Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 1993, pp. 45-55.
44.Chen, C. H., and Li, S., “The effect of visual feedback types on the wait indicator in-terface of a mobile application,” Displays, Vol.61, 2020, pp.1-10.
Cheung譯，利用動畫創造易用性：動畫的 UX 規範，Intersection，2017, Available online: https://intersection.tw/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E5%8B%95%E7%95%AB%E5%89%B5%E9%80%A0%E6%98%93%E7%94%A8%E6%80%A7-%E5%8B%95%E7%95%AB%E7%9A%84-ux-%E5%AE%A3%E8%A8%80-20b6c6475682. (accessed on 1 October 2021).
45.Chiang, T., S. Natarajan, and I. Walker, “A Laboratory Test of the Efficacy of Energy Display Interface Design,” Energy and Buildings, Vol.55, 2012, pp.471–480.
46.Chin, W. W., “How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of partial least squares,” Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp.655-690.
47.Chintalapani, G., Plaisant, C., and Shneiderman, B., “Extending the utility of treemaps with flexile hierarchy,” In Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on Infor-mation Visualisation, IEEE, 2004, pp. 335-344.
48.Chitturi, Ravindra., "Emotions by design: A consumer perspective," International Journal of Design, Vol.3, No.2, 2009, pp.7-17.
49.Constantiou, I. D., “Consumer behaviour in the mobile telecommunications’ market: The individual’s adoption decision of innovative services,” Telematics and Informat-ics, Vol. 26, No.3, 2009, pp.270-281.
50.Cooper A. The inmates are running the asylum: Why high tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Carmel, Undiana: Sams-Pearson Education, 2004.
51.Cooper, A., Reimann, R., and Cronin, D. About face 3: the essentials of interaction design. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
52.Corbin, J. and Anselm S., Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, New York: Sage publications, 2014.
53.Csikszentimihalyi, M., “Purpose and mind,” PsycCRITIQUES, Vol.20, No.4, 1975, pp.352-353.
54.Cummings, N. M., The uses and gratifications of communication in virtual spaces: media depictions of Second Life, 2002-2008, Doctoral dissertation, University Of Or-egon, 2008.
55.Dary W., Brand Seduction：How Neuroscience Can Help Marketers Build Memo-rable Brands, USA, New York: Career Press, Inc, 2016.
56.Davis, F. D., “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of in-formation technology,” MIS quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, 1989, pp.319-340.
57.Dessart, C. E., Motti, V. G., and Vanderdonckt, J., “Animated transitions between user interface views,” In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 2012, pp. 341-348.
58.Eames, Charles, Carla Hartman, and Eames Demetrios., 100 quotes by Charles Eames. California: Eames Office, 2007.
59.Eaves, Y. D., “A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis,” Journal of advanced nursing, Vol.35, No.5, 2001, pp.654-663.
60.Ermi, L., and Mäyrä, F., “Player-centred game design: Experiences in using scenario study to inform mobile game design,” Game Studies, Vol.5, No.1, 2005, pp.1-10.
61.Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., and Davis, L. M., “Atmospheric qualities of online re-tailing: A conceptual model and implications,” Journal of Business research, Vol.54, No.2, 2001, pp.177-184.
62.Falkowska, J., Kilijańska, B., Sobecki, J., and Zerka, K., “Microinteractions of forms in web based systems usability and eye tracking metrics analysis,” In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Springer, Cham, 2018, pp. 164-174.
63.Fang, Y. M., Chun, L., and Chu, B. C., “Older adults’ usability and emotional reac-tions toward text, diagram, image, and animation interfaces for displaying health in-formation,” Applied Sciences, Vol.9, No.6, 2019, pp.1-20.
64.Fang, Y.M.; Sun, M.S., “Applying Eco-Visualisations of Different Iinterface For-mats to Evoke Sustainable Behaviours towards Household Water Saving,” Behav. Inf. Technol, Vol.35, 2016, pp.748–757.
65.Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F., Structural equation models with unobservable varia-bles and measurement error: Algebra and statistics, 1981, pp.382-388.
66.Franzoni, V., Milani, A., Mengoni, P., and Piccinato, F., “Artificial intelligence visual metaphors in E-Learning interfaces for learning analytics,” Applied Sciences, Vol.10, No.20, 2020, pp.71-95.
67.Frohlich, D. M., “Direct manipulation and other lessons,” In Handbook of human-computer interaction, North-Holland, 1997, pp. 463-488.
68.Gardner, P. L., "Measuring ambivalence to science," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 24, No.3, 1987, pp. 241-247.
69.Ghiani, G., Manca, M., Paternò, F., and Santoro, C., “Personalization of context-dependent applications through trigger-action rules,” ACM Transactions on Comput-er-Human Interaction, Vol. 24, No.2, 2017, pp.1-33.
70.Gibson, J. J., The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition, East Sus-sex: Psychology Press, 2014.
71.Gonzaiez, C., “Does Animation in User Interfaces Improve Decision Making?” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 1996, pp.27–34.
72.Gonzales, S., Carson, M. B., Viger, G., O'Keefe, L., Allen, N. B., Ferrie, J. P., and Holmes, K., “User Testing with Microinteractions,” Information Technology and Li-braries, Vol.40, No.1, 2021.
73.Gonzalez, C., “Does animation in user interfaces improve decision making?” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 1996, pp. 27-34.
74.Gorsuch, R. L., “Three methods for analyzing limited time-series (N of 1) data,” Be-havioral Assessment, Vol.5, No.2, 1983.
75.Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., and Gudergan, S. P., Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling, New York: saGe publications, 2017.
76.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C., Análisis multivariante , Vol. 491, Madrid: Prentice Hall, 1999.
77.Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M., “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bul-let,” Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, Vol.19, No.2, 2011, pp.139-152.
78.Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., and Ringle, C. M., “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European business review, Vol.31, No.1, 2019, pp.1-24.
79.Harmon-Jones, C., Bastian, B., and Harmon-Jones, E., “Detecting transient emotional responses with improved self-report measures and instructions,” Emotion, Vol. 16, No.7, 2016.
80.Harrison, A. W., and Rainer Jr, R. K., “The influence of individual differences on skill in end-user computing,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.9, No.1, 1992, pp.93-111.
81.Hayes, Jackie R., "User interface design for online social media," California Poly-technic State University, 2014.
82.Head, V., “Designing Interface Animation: Meaningful Motion for User Experi-ence,” New York: Rosenfeld Media, 2016.
83.Hekkert, P., and Cila, N., “Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors,” Design Studies, Vol.40, 2015, pp.196-217.
84.Hekkert, Paul, and Piet CW van Wieringen, "The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings." Acta psychologica, Vol.94, No.2, 1996, pp.117-131.
85.Henseler, J., Hubona, G., and Ray, P. A., “Using PLS path modeling in new technol-ogy research: updated guidelines,” Industrial management & data systems, Vol.116, No.1, 2016.
86.Hirose, N., “An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition,” Cognitive Sys-tems Research, Vol.3, No.3, 2002, pp.289-299.
87.Holloway, I., and Wheeler, S., Qualitative research in nursing. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2002.
88.Huang, Shih Miao, Li Wu Jeng, and Lin Jui Chang, "Investigating the typical affec-tive meanings influencing interactivity of interactive products for Chinese-speaking users." Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol.311, 2013, pp. 316–321.
89.Huhtala, J., Sarjanoja, A.H., Mantyjarvi, J., Isomursu, M., and Hakkila, J., “Animat-ed UI transitions and perception of time,” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010, pp. 1339–1342.
90.Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A., “Direct manipulation interfac-es,” Human–computer interaction, Vol.1, No.4, 1985, pp.311-338.
91.Ishii, H., Lakatos, D., Bonanni, L., and Labrune, J. B., “Radical atoms: beyond tangi-ble bits, toward transformable materials,” Interactions, Vol.19, No.1, 2012, pp.38-51.
92.ISO, Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts, 2018, Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html (accessed on 29 May 2019).
93.Issara Willenskomer., “Creating Usability with Motion: The UX in Motion Manifes-to,” UX in Motion. 2017, Available online: https://medium.com/ux-in-motion/creating-usability-with-motion-the-ux-in-motion-manifesto-a87a4584ddc (accessed on 1 Oc-tober 2021).
94.Ives, B., “Graphical user interfaces for business information systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol.6, 1982, pp.15-47.
95.James, W., The Principles of Psychology, USA, New York: Henry Holt and Compa-ny, 1890.
96.Jeff, G., Lean UX: Applying lean principles to improve user experience, Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2013.
97.Jokinen, J. P., “Emotional user experience: Traits, events, and states,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 76, 2015, pp. 67-77.
98.Jordan, P. W., Thomas, B., McClelland, I. L., and Weerdmeester, B. (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry, Florida: CRC Press, 1996.
99.Jung, H., Wiltse, H., Wiberg, M., and Stolterman, E., “Metaphors, materialities, and affordances: Hybrid morphologies in the design of interactive artifacts,” Design Stud-ies, Vol.53, 2017, pp. 24-46.
100.Kaiser, H. F., An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, Vol.39, 1974, pp. 31-36.
101.Kang, S. R., & Lee, E., “User experience: Beyond usability,” In 6th Asian Design Conference, 2003.
102.Kapros, E., and Kipp, K., “Microinteractions and a Gamification Framework as a Mechanism for Capturing 21 Century Skills,” In International Conference on Learn-ing and Collaboration Technologies, Springer, Cham, 2016, pp. 25-35.
103.Kashdan, T. B., and Silvia, P. J., “Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge,” Oxford handbook of positive psychology, Vol.2, 2009, pp.367-374.
104.Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., and Fincham, F. D., “Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities,” Journal of per-sonality assessment, Vol.82, No.3, 2004, pp. 291-305.
105.Kennedy, J. M., “Arnheim, Gestalttheory and pictures,” Visual Arts Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1985, pp. 23–44.
106.Kim, B., Choi, M., and Han, I., “User behaviors toward mobile data services: The role of perceived fee and prior experience,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, No.4, 2009, pp.8528-8536.
107.Kim, S., and Lee, S., “Smash the dichotomy of Skeuomorphism and flat design: De-signing an affordable interface to correspond with the human perceptuomotor pro-cess,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.141, 2020.
108.Kim, S., and Lee, S., “Touch Digitality: Affordance Effects of Visual Properties on Gesture Selection,” In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1-8.
109.Koo, D. M., and Lee, J. H., “Inter-relationships among dominance, energetic and tense arousal, and pleasure, and differences in their impacts under online vs. offline environment,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.27, No.5, 2011, pp.1740-1750.
110.Krippendorff, K., “The semanticturn: A new foundation for design,” FL:Taylor&Francis, 2006.
111.Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M., “The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system,” Cognitive science, Vol.4, No.2, 1980, pp.195-208.
112.Lallemand, C., Gronier, G., and Koenig, V., “User experience: A concept without consensus? Exploring practitioners’ perspectives through an international sur-vey,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 43, 2015, pp. 35-48.
113.Lasseter, J., “Principles of traditional animation applied to 3D computer animation,” In Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 1987, pp. 35-44.
114.Law, E. L. C., Van Schaik, P., and Roto, V., “Attitudes towards user experience (UX) measurement,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 72, No.6, 2014, pp.526-541.
115.Lowry, P. B., Gaskin, J., Twyman, N., Hammer, B., and Roberts, T., “Taking ‘fun and games’ seriously: Proposing the hedonic-motivation system adoption model (HMSAM),” Journal of the association for information systems, Vol.14, No.11, 2012, pp.617-671.
116.Ma, J., Chen, C. C., and Lin, Y. C., “Emotional and Cognitive Assessment of Use of Functional Animation.,” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Vision and Applications, 2018, pp. 61-65.
117.Macaranas, A., Antle, A. N., and Riecke, B. E., “What is intuitive interaction? Balanc-ing users’ performance and satisfaction with natural user interfaces,” Interacting with Computers, Vol.27, No.3, 2015, pp.357-370.
118.Markus Jakobsson, and Steven Myers (Eds)., Phishing and countermeasures: Un-derstanding the increasing problem of electronic identity theft, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2006.
119.Matlin, M. W., and Foley, H. J., Sensation and perception, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1992.
120.Matthews, G., and Davies, D. R., “Individual differences in energetic arousal and sustained attention: A dual-task study,” Personality and individual Differ-ences, Vol,31,No.4, 2001, pp. 575-589.
121.McDaniel, R., “Understanding microinteractions as applied research opportunities for information designers,” Communication Design Quarterly Review, Vlo. 3, No.2, 2015, pp.55-62.
122.Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J. A., An approach to environmental psychology. New York: The MIT Press, 1974.
123.Menon, S., and Kahn, B., “Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience,” Journal of retailing, Vol.78, No.1, 2002, pp.31-40.
124.Meuser, Michael, and Ulrike Nagel. "ExpertInneninterviews—vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht." Das Experteninterview. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, 2002,pp. 71-93.
125.Meyer, K., “Long-Term Exposure to Flat Design: How the Trend Slowly Decreases User Efficiency.” 2015, Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/flat-design-long-exposure (accessed on 29 October 2021).
126.Michael A., Dealers of Lightning: Xerox PARC and the Dawn of the Computer Age, New York: Harper Business, 2005.
127.Mitsuo Nagamachi, and Anitawati Mohd Lokman, Innovations of Kansei engineering. Floida: CRC Press, 2016.
128.Neale, Dennis C., and John M. Carroll., “The role of metaphors in user interface de-sign,” Handbook of human-computer interaction, 1997, pp. 441-462.
129.Niedenthal, P. M., “Implicit Perception of Affective Information.” In Origins of Pho-bias and Anxiety Disorders, Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2003, pp.211–273.
130.Nielsen, J., “Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics,” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1994, pp. 152-158.
131.Nielsen, J., Usability 101: Introduction to Usability, 2012, Available online: https://www.nngroup.com/ articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/ (accessed on 29 October 2021).
132.Norman, Donald A., Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, New York: Basic Books, 2004.
133.Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H., “Validity,” Psychometric theory, Vol.3, No.1, 1994, pp.99-132.
134.Olwal, A., Starner, T., and Mainini, G., “E-Textile Microinteractions: Augmenting Twist with Flick, Slide and Grasp Gestures for Soft Electronics,” In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2020, pp. 1-13.
135.Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H., The measurement of mean-ing (No. 47). University of Illinois press, 1957.
136.Oswald, David, "Affordances and metaphors revisited: testing flat vs. skeuomorph design with digital natives and digital immigrants." Proceedings of the 32nd Interna-tional BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, 2018.
137.Pavlou, P. A., and Fygenson, M., “Understanding and predicting electronic com-merce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior,” MIS quarterly, Vol.30, No.1, 2006, pp.115-143.
138.Pearson, Sammy W., and James E. Bailey., “Measurement of computer user satisfac-tion,” ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, Vol.9, No.1, 1980, pp. 59-68.
139.Pibernik, J., Dolic, J., Milicevic, H. A., and Kanizaj, B., “The Effects of the Floating Action Button on Quality of Experience,” Future Internet, Vol. 11, No.7, 2019, pp.148.
140.Posner, M. I., and Boies, S. J., “Components of attention,” Psychological re-view, Vol.78, No.5, 1971, pp.391.
141.Pousman, Z., and J. Stasko., A Taxonomy of Ambient Information Systems: Four Patterns of Design, New York, NY: ACM, 2006.
142.Preece, J., Rogers, Y., and Sharp, H., Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (1st ed.), New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002.
143.Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., Petit, R., and Toivonen, H. “ContextPhone: A prototyp-ing platform for context-aware mobile applications." IEEE pervasive compu-ting, Vol.4, No.2, 2005, pp.51-59.
144.Rasmussen, M. K., Troiano, G. M., Petersen, M. G., Simonsen, J. G., and Hornbæk, K., “Sketching Shape-changing Interfaces: Exploring Vocabulary, Metaphors Use, and Affordances,” In CHI, 2016, pp.2740-2751.
145.Rukhiran, M., and Netinant, P., “A Practical Model From Multidimensional Layering: Personal Finance Information Framework Using Mobile Software Interface Opera-tions,” Journal of Information and Communication Technology, Vol.19, No.3, 2020, pp.321-349.
146.Ryu, K., and Jang, S., “RETRACTED ARTICLE: Influence of restaurants' physical environments on emotion and behavioral intention,” The Service Industries Jour-nal, Vol.28, No.8, 2008, pp.1151-1165.
147.Saffer, D., Microinteractions: designing with details. New York: O'Reilly Media, Inc, 2013.
148.Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Forde, S., Tuch, A. N., and Opwis, K., “Trust and distrust on the web: User experiences and website characteristics,” Computers in human behav-ior, Vol. 45, 2015, pp.39-50.
149.Segars, A. H., and Grover, V., “Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement,” MIS quarterly, Vol.22, No.2, 1998, pp.139-163.
150.Sinico, M., “To communicate withoutsigns through expressive qualities,” Gestalt Theory, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2019, pp. 47–60.
151.Speziale, H. S., Streubert, H. J., and Carpenter, D. R., Qualitative research in nurs-ing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wil-kins, 2011.
152.Still, J. D., and Dark, V. J., “Examining working memory load and congruency ef-fects on affordances and conventions,” International journal of human-computer studies, Vol.68, No.9, 2010, pp.561-571.
153.Stol, K. J., Ralph, P., and Fitzgerald, B., “Grounded theory in software engineering research: a critical review and guidelines,” In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2016, pp. 120-131.
154.Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., Basic of Qualitatiove research: Grounded theory proce-dures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
155.Strauss, A., and Corbin, J., Basics of qualitative research techniques, Thousand oaks, CA: Sage publications, 1998.
156.Streubert-Speziale, H. J., and Carpenter, D. R., Qualitative research in nursing: Ad-vancing the humanistic imperative (3rd ed.), Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott, 2003.
157.Sun, H., and Zhang, P., “The role of moderating factors in user technology ac-ceptance,” International journal of human-computer studies, Vol.64, No.2, 2006, pp.53-78.
158.Taylor, S., and Todd, P., “Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience,” MIS quarterly, Vol.19, No.4, 1995, pp.561-570.
159.Teuber, M., Blue Night by Paul Klee. In: Henle, M., ed., Vision and Artifact, 1976, New York: Springer, pp. 131-151
160.Thayer, R. E., “Energy, tiredness, and tension effects of a sugar snack versus moder-ate exercise,” Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.52, No.1, 1987, pp.119.
161.Thomas, Frank, Ollie Johnston, and Frank Thomas. The illusion of life: Disney ani-mation. New York: Hyperion, 1995.
162.Thovtrup, H., and Nielsen, J., “Assessing the usability of a user interface standard,” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1991, pp. 335-341.
163.Van der Heijden, H., “User acceptance of hedonic information systems,” MIS quar-terly, Vol.28, No.4, 2004, pp.695-704.
164.Van Der Linden, J., Amadieu, F., and Van De Leemput, C., “User Experience: A plural structure varying according to interaction types and social support,” 19th In-ternational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Vancouver, 2017, pp. 9-14.
165.Vanderdonckt, J., Bouzit, S., Calvary, G., and Chene, D., “Exploring a Design Space of Graphical Adaptive Menus: Normal vs. Small Screens.” ACM Transactions on In-teractive Intelligent Systems, Vol.10, No.1, 2019, pp.1-40.
166.Veen, J., The art & science of web design. San Francisco: New Riders, 2001.
167.Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D., “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test,” Decision sciences, Vol.27, No.3, 1996, pp.451-481.
168.Warren, W. H., “Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing,” Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, Vol.10, No.5, 1984, pp.683.
169.Webster, J., and Ho, H., “Audience engagement in multimedia presentations,” ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, Vol.28, No.2, 1997, pp.63-77.
170.Wimpenny, P., and Gass, J., “Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?” Journal of advanced nursing, Vol.31, No.6, 2000, pp.1485-1492.
171.Wold, H., “Systems under indirect observation using PLS,” A second generation of multivariate analysis: Methods, 1982.
172.Xenakis, I., and Arnellos, A., “The relation between interaction aesthetics and af-fordances,” Design Studies, Vol.34, No.1, 2013, pp.57-73.
173.Youn, J. H., Seo, Y. H., and Oh, M. S., “A study on UI design of social networking service messenger by using case analysis model,” Journal of information and com-munication convergence engineering, Vol.15, No.2, 2017, pp.104-111.
174.Zimbardo, P. G., and Ruch, F. L., Psychology and life (9th ed.). Scott, Foresman, 1975.