:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:獨立生活之高齡者使用機器人輔助日常生活活動意向的影響因素研究
作者:黃天楊
作者(外文):HUANG, TIAN-YANG
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:設計學院設計博士班
指導教授:黃啟梧
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2021
主題關鍵詞:高齡者機器人使用意向科技接受模式結構方程模型ElderlyRobotBehavioral Intentions to useTechnology Acceptance ModelStructural Equation Model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
隨著年齡的增長,獨立生活之高齡者需要更多的外部輔助來開展日常生活活動,以實現其獨立性及在地老化。機器人是能用於高齡者日常生活活動輔助的潛在方案,然而,高齡者接受使用機器人輔助之意向的影響因素卻知之甚少。為此,本研究以科技接受模式(TAM)為理論基礎,加入任務科技適配模式中的任務特徵、科技特徵與任務科技適配度、社會認知理論中的自我效能、個人電腦使用模型中的社會因素,以及價格效應之概念關係模式中的感知價值變數,構建了高齡者機器人技術接受模型(SRTAM),探討了該接受模型中各影響因素間的關係。研究採用結構方程模型對403份資料進行分析,結果顯示感知有用性和社會因素正向影響使用態度和使用意向;感知易用性對感知有用性和使用態度有積極影響;科技特徵是任務科技適配度的前置因素;任務科技適配度對感知有用性和使用意向有顯著影響;使用態度顯著影響使用意向;自我效能正向影響感知易用性,但其對感知有用性和使用意向的影響卻未顯著;研究顯示任務科技適配度對使用意向的影響效果最大,其次是感知有用性和使用態度。本研究進一步拓展了TAM,豐富了TAM的應用,並為高齡輔助機器人的研發設計與接受度研究提供了參考。
With the increase of age, the elderly who live independently need more external assistance to carry out their daily life activities in order to achieve their independence and ageing in place. Robots are a potential solution that can be used to assist the elderly in daily activities. However, little is known about the factors that influence the elderly’s intention to use robots. Therefore, this research takes the technology acceptance model (TAM) as the theoretical foundation, add task characteristics, technology characteristics, and task-technology fit in the task-technology fit model, self-efficacy in the theory of social cognitive, social factor in the model of personal computer utilization, and the perceived value in the conceptual relationship model of price effect. The Senior robot technology acceptance model (SRTAM) is constructed, and the relationship among the factors in the acceptance model is discussed. A Structural Equation Model was used to analyze 403 samples of data. The results showed that perceived usefulness and social factors had positive effects on attitude towards using and behavioral intentions to use. Perceived ease of use has a positive effect on perceived usefulness and attitude toward using; Technology characteristics are the antecedents of task-technology fit; Task-technology fit has a significant effect on perceived usefulness and behavioral intentions to use; Attitude toward using significantly affects behavioral intentions to use. Self-efficacy positively affected perceived ease of use, but its effect on perceived usefulness and behavioral intentions to use was not significant. Research has shown that task-technology fit has the greatest effect on behavioral intentions to use, followed by perceived usefulness and attitude toward using. This study further expanded TAM, enriched its application, and provided a reference for the research and development, design and acceptance of age-assisted robots.
Adjzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ajzen, I. (1991a). Benefits of leisure: A social psychological perspective. Benefits of leisure, 411-417.
Ajzen, I. (1991b). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. Handbook Attitudes, 173, 31.
Akter, S., D'ambra, J., & Ray, P. (2011). An evaluation of PLS based complex models: the roles of power analysis, predictive relevance and GoF index. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2011)(pp.1-7), Detroit, USA.
Al-Maatouk, Q., Othman, M. S., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2020). Task-Technology Fit and Technology Acceptance Model Application to Structure and Evaluate the Adoption of Social Media in Academia. IEEE Access, 8, 78427-78440.
Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(11), 825-840.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the association for information systems, 8(4), 3.
Baisch, T. Kolling, B. Klein, J. Pantel, F. Oswald, & Knopf., M. (2018). Dynamic interplay between general experience and robot-specific expertise at older adults‘ first encounter with a robot: Implications for robot design. Gerontechonology, 17(4), 215-231.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social clinical Psychology Review, 4(3), 359-373.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales.Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), (pp. 307-337). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 56(5), 805-814.
Bardaro, G., Antonini, A., & Motta, E. (2021). Robots for Elderly Care in the Home: A Landscape Analysis and Co-Design Toolkit. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1-25.
Barea, R., Bergasa, L., López, E., Escudero, M., Hernández, J., & Willemaers, Y. (2004). Tele-medicine system based on a personal robotic assistant. Paper presented at the 10th IEEE Internacional Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics MMAR, Miedzyzdroje, Poland : 909-915.
Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kennsuke, K. (2005). A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human- Computer Interaction, Las Vegas.
Beer, J., Prakash, A., Smarr, C., Chen, T., Hawkins, K., Nguyen, H., & Rogers, W. (2017). Older users’ acceptance of an assistive robot: Attitudinal changes following brief exposure. Gerontechnology, 16(1), 21-36.
Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis TAM? Journal of the association for information systems, 8(4), 211-218.
Biswas, M., Romeo, M., Cangelosi, A., & Jones, R. B. (2020). Are older people any different from younger people in the way they want to interact with robots? Scenario based survey. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 14(1), 61-72.
Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value. Journal of consumer research, 17(4), 375-384.
Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H. (2009). Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 94-103.
Bruner, G., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 58(5), 553-558.
Bugmann, G., & Copleston, S. N. (2011). What can a personal robot do for you? Paper presented at the Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2002). Violent video games and hostile expectations: A test of the general aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1679-1686.
Cajita, M. I., Hodgson, N. A., Budhathoki, C., & Han, H. R. (2017). Intention to Use mHealth in Older Adults With Heart Failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 32(6), E1-E7.
Cajita, M. I., Hodgson, N. A., Lam, K. W., Yoo, S., & Han, H.-R. (2018). Facilitators of and barriers to mHealth adoption in older adults with heart failure. Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN, 36(8), 376-382.
Caranasos, G. J. (1993). A more opportune description of the stages of aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41(8), 888.
Carmeli, E. (2009). Aspects of assistive gerontechnology. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 8(3), 215-217.
Casey, D., Felzmann, H., Pegman, G., Kouroupetroglou, C., Murphy, K., Koumpis, A., & Whelan, S. (2016). What people with dementia want: designing MARIO an acceptable robot companion. Paper presented at the International conference on computers helping people with special needs, Springer, Cham.
Cassel, C., Hackl, P., & Westlund, A. H. (1999). Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. Journal of applied statistics, 26(4), 435-446.
Chang, I.-C., Hwang, H.-G., Hung, W.-F., & Li, Y.-C. (2007). Physicians’ acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(2), 296-303.
Chen, H.-R., & Tseng, H.-F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan. Evaluation and program planning, 35(3), 398-406.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H.-s. (2013). Use or non-use of gerontechnology—A qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(10), 4645-4666.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. (2011). A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology, 10(1), 1-12.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635-652.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-336).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1674-1684.
Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of marketing research, 16(1), 64-73.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd editon). Hillsdale,New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS quarterly, 145-158.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16-29.
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333-352.
Dadlani, P., Sinitsyn, A., Fontijn, W., & Markopoulos, P. (2010). Aurama: caregiver awareness for living independently with an augmented picture frame display. Ai & Society, 25(2), 233-245.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
De Graaf, M. M., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 115-173.
De Veer, A. J., Peeters, J. M., Brabers, A. E., Schellevis, F. G., Rademakers, J. J. J., & Francke, A. L. (2015). Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC health services research, 15(1), 103-111.
Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 307-319.
Dubowsky, S., Genot, F., Godding, S., Kozono, H., Skwersky, A., Yu, H., & Yu, L. S. (2000). PAMM-A robotic aid to the elderly for mobility assistance and monitoring: a" helping-hand" for the elderly. Paper presented at the Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37065).
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statistical science, 54-75.
Egea, J. M. O., & González, M. V. R. (2011). Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 319-332.
El Hedhli, K., Chebat, J.-C., & Sirgy, M. J. (2013). Shopping well-being at the mall: Construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 856-863.
Ellis, R. D., & Allaire, J. C. (1999). Modeling computer interest in older adults: The role of age, education, computer knowledge, and computer anxiety. Human Factors, 41(3), 345-355.
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009). More than a servant: Self-reported willingness of younger and older adults to having a robot perform interactive and critical tasks in the home. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting.
Ferreira, J. B., da Rocha, A., & da Silva, J. F. (2014). Impacts of technology readiness on emotions and cognition in Brazil. Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 865-873.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, UK: Addison-Wesley.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for information systems, 4(1), 1-78.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American psychologist, 52(1), 45-56.
Gillsjö, C., & Schwartz‐Barcott, D. (2011). A concept analysis of home and its meaning in the lives of three older adults. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 6(1), 4-12.
Giuliani, M. V., Scopelliti, M., & Fornara, F. (2005). Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. Paper presented at the Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on.
González, A., Ramírez, M. P., & Viadel, V. (2015). ICT learning by older adults and their attitudes toward computer use. Current gerontology and geriatrics research, 2015, 1-7.
Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management science, 41(12), 1827-1844.
Goodhue, D. L. (1998). Development and measurement validity of a task‐technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information system. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 105-138.
Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D., & March, S. T. (2000). User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Information & Management, 38(2), 87-101.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS quarterly, 213-236.
Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J., & Cajander, Å. (2003). Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22(6), 397-409.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair J, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). washington,dc: Sage publications.
Hair J, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage publications.
Hasan, B. (2006). Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on IS acceptance. Information & Management, 43(5), 565-571.
Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 20(3), 76-88.
Heerink, M. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social robots by aging adults. Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Heerink, M. (2011). Exploring the influence of age, gender, education and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. Paper presented at the 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Lausanne Switzerland, 147-148.
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010a). Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361-375.
Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010b). Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot. Virtual Reality, 14(1), 77-84.
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2006). Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. International Journal of Assistive Robotics and Mechatronics, 7(3), 33-43.
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., . . . Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organizational research methods, 17(2), 182-209.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43(1), 115-135.
Ho, S. H., & Ko, Y. Y. (2008). Effects of self‐service technology on customer value and customer readiness: The case of Internet banking. Internet Research.
Hoefman, R., Meulenkamp, T., & De Jong, J. (2017). Who is responsible for providing care? Investigating the role of care tasks and past experiences in a cross-sectional survey in the Netherlands. BMC health services research, 17(1), 477.
Huang, T., & Huang, C. (2021). Attitudes of the elderly living independently towards the use of robots to assist with activities of daily living. Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation, 69,55–65.
Huang, T. Y., & Huang, C. W. (2019). Elderly's acceptance of companion robots from the perspective of user factors. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14.
Hung-Chou, L., Te-Yung, C., & Su-Hui, K. (2018). Effects of Social Influence and System Characteristics on Traceable Agriculture Product Reuse Intention of Elderly People: Integrating Trust and Attitude Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(3), 291.
Hung, L. L., Liu, C., Woldum, E., Au-Yeung, A., Berndt, A., Wallsworth, C., . . . Chaudhury, H. (2019). The benefits of and barriers to using a social robot PARO in care settings: a scoping review. Bmc Geriatrics, 19(1), 232.
Hung, S. Y., & Liang, T. P. (2001). Effect of computer self‐efficacy on the use of executive support systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(5), 227–237.
Ienca, M., Jotterand, F., Vica, C., & Elger, B. (2016). Social and Assistive Robotics in Dementia Care: Ethical Recommendations for Research and Practice. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 565-573.
International Federation of Robotics. (2020a). Executive Summary World Robotics 2020 Industrial Robots. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/Executive_Summary_WR_2020_Industrial_Robots_1.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.
International Federation of Robotics. (2020b). Executive Summary World Robotics 2020 Service Robots. Retrieved from https://ifr.org/img/worldrobotics/Executive_Summary_WR_2020_Service_Robots.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2020.
Islam, M. M., & Hossain, M. E. (2015). An Investigation of Consumers' Acceptance of Mobile Banking in Bangladesh. International Journal of Innovation in the Digital Economy(IJIDE), 6(3), 16-32.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102-138.
Junglas, I., Abraham, C., & Ives, B. (2009). Mobile technology at the frontlines of patient care: Understanding fit and human drives in utilization decisions and performance. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), 634-647.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark IV. Educational and psychological measurement, 34(1), 111-117.
Kavandi, H., & Jaana, M. (2020). Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: A systematic review. Health & Social Care in the Community.
Khaksar, S. M. S., Khosla, R., Singaraju, S., & Slade, B. (2019). Carer’s perception on social assistive technology acceptance and adoption: moderating effects of perceived risks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-24.
Kim, H.-b., Kim, T. T., & Shin, S. W. (2009). Modeling roles of subjective norms and eTrust in customers' acceptance of airline B2C eCommerce websites. Tourism Management, 30(2), 266-277.
Kim, S., & Garrison, G. (2009). Investigating mobile wireless technology adoption: An extension of the technology acceptance model. 11(3), 323-333.
Koay, K. L., Syrdal, D. S., Walters, M. L., & Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Living with robots: Investigating the habituation effect in participants' preferences during a longitudinal human-robot interaction study. Paper presented at the Robot and Human interactive Communication, 2007. RO-MAN 2007. The 16th IEEE International Symposium on.
Koceski, S., & Koceska, N. (2016). Evaluation of an Assistive Telepresence Robot for Elderly Healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems, 40(5), 7.
Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the association for information systems, 13(7) , 546-580.
Kohnke, A., Cole, M. L., & Bush, R. (2014). Incorporating UTAUT predictors for understanding home care patients' and clinician's acceptance of healthcare telemedicine equipment. Journal of technology management & innovation, 9(2), 29-41.
Krick, T., Huter, K., Domhoff, D., Schmidt, A., Rothgang, H., & Wolf-Ostermann, K. (2019). Digital technology and nursing care: ascoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies. BMC health services research, 19, 400.
Kwak, M.-K., Lee, J., & Cha, S.-S. (2021). Senior Consumer Motivations and Perceived Value of Robot Service Restaurants in Korea. Sustainability, 13(5), 2755.
Latikka, R., Turja, T., & Oksanen, A. (2019). Self-efficacy and acceptance of robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 157-163.
Lawton, M. P. (1990). Aging and performance of home tasks. Human Factors, 32(5), 527-536.
Lee, J., Lee, D., Park, Y., Lee, S., & Ha, T. (2019). Autonomous vehicles can be shared, but a feeling of ownership is important: Examination of the influential factors for intention to use autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 107, 411-422.
Lee, M.-T., Su, Z.-Y., Hou, Y.-H., Liao, H.-C., & Lian, J.-D. (2011). A decision support system for diagnosis related groups coding. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3626-3631.
Lee, M. K. O., Shi, N., Cheung, C. M. K., Lim, K. H., & Sia, C. L. (2011). Consumer's decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Information & Management, 48(6), 185-191.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for information systems, 12(1), 752-780.
Lim, S., Xue, L. S., Yen, C. C., Chang, L., Chan, H. C., Tai, B. C., . . . Choolani, M. (2011). A study on Singaporean women's acceptance of using mobile phones to seek health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(12), e189-e202.
Lin, W.-S., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Antecedences to continued intentions of adopting e-learning system in blended learning instruction: A contingency framework based on models of information system success and task-technology fit. Computers & Education, 58(1), 88-99.
Lindenberger, U., Lovden, M., Schellenbach, M., Li, S. C., & Kruger, A. (2008). Psychological principles of successful aging technologies: A mini-review. Gerontology, 54(1), 59-68.
Linner, T., Guttler, J., Bock, T., & Georgoulas, C. (2015). Assistive robotic micro-rooms for independent living. Automation in Construction, 51, 8-22.
Liu, I.-F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers Educational Gerontology, 54(2), 600-610.
Lohmöller, J.-B. (1989). Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Heidelberg, Germany:: Physica.
Louie, W. Y. G., McColl, D., & Nejat, G. (2014). Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults. Assistive Technology, 26(3), 140-150.
Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 57(2), 123-146.
Lu, J. F., Chi, M. J., & Chen, C. M. (2014). Advocacy of home telehealth care among consumers with chronic conditions. Journal of clinical nursing, 23(5-6), 811-819.
Łukasik, S., Tobis, S., Kropińska, S., & Suwalska, A. (2020). Role of Assistive Robots in the Care of Older People: Survey Study Among Medical and Nursing Students. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e18003.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84-99.
Macedo, I. M. (2017). Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: An empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 935-948.
Marcel, I. (1991). Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: a pilot study. Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 28(2).
Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
Matzler, K., Bailom, F., Hinterhuber, H. H., Renzl, B., & Pichler, J. (2004). The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance–performance analysis. Industrial marketing management, 33(4), 271-277.
McColl, D., & Nejat, G. (2014). A Socially Assistive Robot That Can Monitor Affect of the Elderly During Mealtime Assistance. Journal of Medical Devices-Transactions of the Asme, 8(3), 2.
Melzer, P. (2019). Towards a holistic evaluation concept for personalised learning in flipped classrooms. In A Conceptual Framework for Personalised Learning (pp. 101-116). Gabler, Wiesbaden.: Springer.
Miao, R., Wu, Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Song, Y., Zhang, H., . . . Jiang, Z. (2017). Factors that influence users’ adoption intention of mobile health: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Production Research, 55(19), 5801-5815.
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2017). Report of the Senior Citizen Condition Survey 2017. Retrieved from https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-48636-de32ad67-19c8-46d6-b96c-8826f6039fcb.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2020.
Mitzner, T. L., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Identifying the Potential for Robotics to Assist Older Adults in Different Living Environments. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 213-227.
Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. In Perceived Quality (pp. 209-232): MA: Lexington Books.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
Moores, T. T. (2012). Towards an integrated model of IT acceptance in healthcare. Decision Support Systems, 53(3), 507-516.
Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel psychology, 53(2), 375-403.
Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C. J., & Murfield, J. E. (2019). “She had a smile on her face as wide as the great Australian bite”: a qualitative examination of family perceptions of a therapeutic robot and a plush toy. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 177-185.
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Murfield, J., Thalib, L., Beattie, E., Shum, D., & Draper, B. (2019). Using a therapeutic companion robot for dementia symptoms in long-term care: reflections from a cluster-RCT. Aging & Mental Health, 23(3), 329-336.
Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Cambridge: Academic Press
O'brien, M. A., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2012). Understanding age and technology experience differences in use of prior knowledge for everyday technology interactions. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 4(2), 1-27.
Office, C. (2014). 2014 White Paper on Aging Society (Summary Version). Retrieved from https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2014/gaiyou/s11.html/. Accessed 10 Dec 2020.
Oh, J.-C., & Yoon, S.-J. (2014). Predicting the use of online information services based on a modified UTAUT model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(7), 716-729.
Oh, S. H., Kim, Y. M., Lee, C. W., Shim, G. Y., Park, M. S., & Jung, H. S. (2009). Consumer adoption of virtual stores in Korea: Focusing on the role of trust and playfulness. Psychology Marketing, 26(7), 652-668.
Okazaki, S., & Mendez, F. (2013). Exploring convenience in mobile commerce: Moderating effects of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1234-1242.
Oksenberg, L., & Kalton, G. (1991). New strategies for pretesting survey questions. Journal of official statistics, 7(3), 349-365.
Or, C. K., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009). A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(4), 550-560.
Pagani, M. (2006). Determinants of adoption of high speed data services in the business market: evidence for a combined technology acceptance model with task technology fit model. Information & Management, 43(7), 847-860.
Pal, D., Funilkul, S., Vanijja, V., & Papasratorn, B. (2018). Analyzing the Elderly Users' Adoption of Smart-Home Services. Ieee Access, 6, 51238-51252.
Pal, D., Triyason, T., Funilkul, S., & Chutimaskul, W. (2018). Smart homes and quality of life for the elderly: Perspective of competing models. Ieee Access, 6, 8109-8122.
Pan, S. Y., & Jordan-Marsh, M. (2010). Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1111-1119.
Patterson, P. G., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business‐to‐business, services context: an empirical examination. International Journal of service Industry management.
Peterson, R. (1997). A quantitative analysis of rating-scale response variability. Marketing Letters, 8(1), 9-21.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
Ponte, E. B., Carvajal-Trujillo, E., & Escobar-Rodríguez, T. (2015). Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tourism Management, 47, 286-302.
Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2006). Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), 999-1007.
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta psychologica, 104(1), 1-15.
Quaosar, G. A. A., Hoque, M. R., & Bao, Y. (2018). Investigating factors affecting Elderly's intention to use m-health services: An empirical study. Telemedicine and E-Health, 24(4), 309-314.
Rahimpour, M., Lovell, N. H., Celler, B. G., & McCormick, J. (2008). Patients' perceptions of a home telecare system. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(7), 486-498.
Rahman, M. S., Ko, M., Warren, J., & Carpenter, D. (2016). Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 12-24.
Ramírez-Correa, P., Grandón, E. E., Ramírez-Santana, M., & Belmar Órdenes, L. (2019). Explaining the use of social network sites as seen by older adults: The enjoyment component of a hedonic information system. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(10), 1673.
Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in" MIS Quarterly". MIS quarterly, iii-xiv.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.
Rogers, W. A., Meyer, B., Walker, N., & Fisk, A. D. (1998). Functional limitations to daily living tasks in the aged: A focus group analysis. Human Factors, 40(1), 111-125.
Roy, S. K., Shekhar, V., Lassar, W. M., & Chen, T. (2018). Customer engagement behaviors: The role of service convenience, fairness and quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 293-304.
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90-103.
Scopelliti, M., Giuliani, M. V., & Fornara, F. (2005). Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 146-155.
Sefcik, J. S., Johnson, M. J., Yim, M., Lau, T., Vivio, N., Mucchiani, C., & Cacchione, P. Z. (2018). Stakeholders' Perceptions Sought to Inform the Development of a Low-Cost Mobile Robot for Older Adults: A Qualitative Descriptive Study. Clinical Nursing Research, 27(1), 61-80.
Selwyn, N. (2004). The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18(4), 369-384.
Seo, K.-H., & Lee, J.-H. (2021). The Emergence of Service Robots at Restaurants: Integrating Trust, Perceived Risk, and Satisfaction. Sustainability, 13(8), 4431.
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. European review of social psychology, 12(1), 1-36.
Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of consumer research, 15(3), 325-343.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., & Blake, J. (2019). The effectiveness of various robotic technologies in assisting older adults. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 892-918.
Shore, L., Power, V., De Eyto, A., & O’Sullivan, L. W. (2018). Technology acceptance and user-centred design of assistive exoskeletons for older adults: A commentary. Robotics, 7(1), 3.
Shu, Q., Tu, Q., & Wang, K. (2011). The impact of computer self-efficacy and technology dependence on computer-related technostress: A social cognitive theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(10), 923-939.
Silva, R., Rodrigues, R., & Leal, C. (2020). Social Factors Influence on Accounting Students Attitude to Use Games Based Learning. In The Role of Gamification in Software Development Lifecycle: IntechOpen.
Smarr, C. A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014). Domestic Robots for Older Adults: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(2), 229-247.
Snoj, B., Korda, A. P., & Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product & Brand Management.
Sobrepera, M. J., Lee, V. G., Garg, S., Mendonca, R., & Johnson, M. J. (2021). Perceived Usefulness of a Social Robot Augmented Telehealth Platform by Therapists in the United States. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 6(2), 2946-2953.
Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? Ai & Society, 31(4), 445-454.
Stafford, R., Broadbent, E., Jayawardena, C., Unger, U., Kuo, I. H., Igic, A., . . . MacDonald, B. A. (2010). Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. Paper presented at the 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 82-87.
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D. M., & Broadbent, E. (2014). Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(1), 17-32.
Stapels, J. G., & Eyssel, F. (2021). Let’s not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots. Plos One, 16(1), e0244697.
Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2017). Statistical hand book of Japan 2017. Retrieved from http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/index.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2020.
Straub, D., & Burton-Jones, A. (2007). Veni, vidi, vici: Breaking the TAM logjam. Journal of the association for information systems, 8(4), 5.
Sun, H. S., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Syed-Abdul, S., Malwade, S., Nursetyo, A. A., Sood, M., Bhatia, M., Barsasella, D., . . . Raja, M. (2019). Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. Bmc Geriatrics, 19(1), 223.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 125-143.
Tsai, C.-H. (2014). Integrating social capital theory, social cognitive theory, and the technology acceptance model to explore a behavioral model of telehealth systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(5), 4905-4925.
United Nations. (2017). World Population Ageing 2017. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2020.
Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information technology theory and application, 11(2), 5-40.
Ursachi, G., Horodnic, I. A., & Zait, A. (2015). How reliable are measurement scales? External factors with indirect influence on reliability estimators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 679-686.
Van Kemenade, M. A., Hoorn, J. F., & Konijn, E. A. (2018). Healthcare Students' Ethical Considerations of Care Robots in The Netherlands. Applied Sciences-Basel, 8(10), 1712.
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Dzi, K., & Gastmans, C. (2021). Older adults’ experiences with and perceptions of the use of socially assistive robots in aged care: A systematic review of quantitative evidence. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 104399.
Varki, S., & Colgate, M. (2001). The role of price perceptions in an integrated model of behavioral intentions. Journal of Service research, 3(3), 232-240.
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. J. M. q. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. 115-139.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2006). Living with seal robots in a care house-evaluations of social and physiological influences. Paper presented at the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
Wang, E. S. T., & Chou, N. P. Y. (2014). Consumer Characteristics, Social Influence, and System Factors on Online Group-buying Repurchasing Intention. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 119-132.
Wang, L., Chen, J., & Ju, D.-Y. (2021). Factors Contributing to Korean Older Adults’ Acceptance of Assistive Social Robots. Electronics, 10(18), 2204.
Wang, N., Shen, X.-L., & Sun, Y. (2013). Transition of electronic word-of-mouth services from web to mobile context: A trust transfer perspective. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1394-1403.
Wang, Q., & Sun, X. (2016). Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM). Technological Forecasting Social Change, 107, 59-68.
Wang, R. H., Sudhama, A., Begum, M., Huq, R., & Mihailidis, A. (2017). Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(1), 67-79.
Wang, S.-L., Chen, Y. L., Kuo, A. M.-H., Chen, H.-M., & Shiu, Y. S. (2016). Design and evaluation of a cloud-based Mobile Health Information Recommendation system on wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 49, 221-235.
Wang, S. L., & Lin, H. I. (2019). Integrating TTF and IDT to evaluate user intention of big data analytics in mobile cloud healthcare system. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(9), 974-985.
Webster, C., & Ivanov, S. (2021). Tourists’ perceptions of robots in passenger transport. Technology in Society, 67, 101720.
Whelan, S., Murphy, K., Barrett, E., Krusche, C., Santorelli, A., & Casey, D. (2018). Factors Affecting the Acceptability of Social Robots by Older Adults Including People with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment: A Literature Review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 643-668.
Wiener, J. M., Hanley, R. J., Clark, R., & Van Nostrand, J. F. (1990). Measuring the activities of daily living: Comparisons across national surveys. Journal of gerontology, 45(6), 229-237.
Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 57(2), 185-209.
Williams, M. D., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2014). Consumers' intentions to use e-readers. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(2), 66-76.
Wolbring, G., & Yumakulov, S. (2014). Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6(3), 457-468.
Wold, H. (1974). Causal flows with latent variables: partings of the ways in the light of NIPALS modelling. European economic review, 5(1), 67-86.
World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ageing/events/world-report-2015-launch/en/
Wu, D., Gu, H., Gu, S., & You, H. (2021). Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory. Health Policy and Technology, 100525.
Xu, Q. L., Ng, J. S., Tan, O. Y., & Huang, Z. Y. (2015). Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 477-486.
Yang, H.-d., & Yoo, Y. (2004). It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model. Decision Support Systems, 38(1), 19-31.
Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256-269.
Yang, S., Lu, Y., Chen, Y., & Gupta, S. (2015). Understanding consumers' mobile channel continuance: an empirical investigation of two fitness mechanisms. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(12), 1135-1146.
Yen, D. C., Wu, C.-S., Cheng, F.-F., & Huang, Y.-W. (2010). Determinants of users’ intention to adopt wireless technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 906-915.
Yeo, V. C. S., Goh, S.-K., & Rezaei, S. (2017). Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 35, 150-162.
Yoo, S. J., Han, S.-h., & Huang, W. (2012). The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 942-950.
Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: a meta‐analysis of the TAM: Part 1. Journal of Modelling in Management, 2(3), 251–280.
Yu, P., Li, H., & Gagnon, M.-P. (2009). Health IT acceptance factors in long-term care facilities: a cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(4), 219-229.
Yusif, S., Soar, J., & Hafeez-Baig, A. (2016). Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 94, 112-116.
Yusoff, R., & Mohd Janor, R. (2014). Generation of an interval metric scale to measure attitude. Sage Open, 4(1), 1-16.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
Zhang, X., Yu, P., Yan, J., & Spil, I. T. A. (2015). Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC health services research, 15(1), 71.
Zhou, J. N., Zhang, B., Tan, R. H., Tseng, M. L., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2020). Exploring the Systematic Attributes Influencing Gerontechnology Adoption for Elderly Users Using a Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 12(7), 17.
陳禹辰, 尚榮安, 何照義, & 謝素娟. (2008). 公用服務事業員工的 e 化科技接受意圖: 以 TAM 與 TTF 探討. 電子商務學報, 10(1), 305-327.
陳禹辰, 尚榮安, & 劉蔚廷. (2010). 以 TAM 與 TTF 探討組織員工的 e 化科技接受意圖—組織疏離員工的組織學習效應. 資訊管理學報, 17(4), 139-169.
陳至柔, 吳如娟, & 林松江. (2016). 雲端 CRM 系統持續使用意圖之實證研究: 整合任務-科技適配模式與體制理論. 電子商務學報, 18(1), d1-40.
龔仲華, & 龔曉雯. (2018). Industry4.0時代的主角 : 工業機器人完全掌握. 臺灣: 佳魁資訊.
國家發展委員會. (2018). 中華民國人口推估(2018至2065年). Retrieved from https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=84223C65B6F94D72/.取自2018年12月9日.
洪新原, 洪幼力, & 劉晴. (2020). 影響顧客使用理財機器人之因素. 資訊管理學報, 27(3), 341-375.
李文雅. (2003). TAM 與TTF 整合模式之驗證:以乙級電腦軟體應用技術士為例. 國立雲林科技大學資訊管理所碩士論文.
李雲江. (2011). 機器人概論. 北京: 機械工業出版社.
梅陳玉嬋, 齊依, & 徐永德. (2009). 老年社會工作.上海:上海人民出版社.
邱皓政. (2019). 量化研究與統計分析: SPSS 與 R 資料分析範例解析. 臺北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
王宗松. (2012). 多元族群學生之資訊能力與採用行動數位元學習模式對科技接受度之影響. 大仁學報(41), 71-88.
吳明隆. (2011). SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計. 臺北: 易習圖書.
吳文智, & 王本正. (2016). 以整合型科技接受模式探討照護型機器人輔助於高齡者之服務研究. 福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 4(2), 285-286.
謝俊宏. (2013). 以社會影響因素觀點探討企業對 IFRS 財報軟體使用意圖之研究. 建國科大社會人文期刊, 32(1), 41-59.
許麗穎, & 喻豐. (2020). 機器人接受度的影響因素. 科學通訊, 65, 496-510.
張冬妮. (2013). 基於科技接受模型理論的老年居家健康管理系統接受度及其影響因素的調查研究. 廣州: 南方醫科大學社會醫學與衛生管理事業管理(碩士班)
張紀萍. (2015). 科技接受模式與應用-以慢性病長者遠距照護使用為例. 護理雜誌, 62(3), 11.
鄭淑華, 許哲瀚, 龔建吉, 張馨雲, & 趙建蕾. (2019). 結合科技接受模型及任務科技配適度探討護理人員使用社群媒體對工作績效之影響. 醫務管理期刊, 20(4), 267-287.
中國國家統計局. (2018). 中國人口與就業統計年鑒-2018. 北京: 中國統計出版社.
周浩, & 龍立榮. (2004). 共同方法偏差的統計檢驗與控制方法. 心理科學進展, 12(6), 942-950.
周家華. (2000). 老人學研究-理論與實務. 臺北: 正中書局.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top