知覺轉化的機制：從引動認知理論理解費登奎斯方法的教與學_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	知覺轉化的機制：從引動認知理論理解費登奎斯方法的教與學
作者：	陳代樾
作者(外文)：	CHEN, TAI-YUEH
校院名稱：	國立臺北藝術大學
系所名稱：	舞蹈研究所
指導教授：	陳雅萍王雲幼
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2022
主題關鍵詞：	費登奎斯方法；引動認知理論；身體意象；身體基模；預測程序理論；知覺轉化；The Feldenkrais Method；Enactive Cognition；Body Image；Body Schema；Predictive Processing；Perceptual Transformation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:0

本研究關注費登奎斯方法(the Feldenkrais Method)的理論與實踐，藉由研究者自身同為實踐者的雙重身分，探問身體技能學習過程中從初學到專家的知覺轉化經驗，並從引動認知理論(enactive cognition)提供實用的建議。藉由引動性(enactive)、外延性(extended)與具身性(embodied)三個原則，本研究認為1.知覺轉化與行動有關，專家能藉由改變行動的方式獲得有效的訊息；2.知覺轉化與注意力和認知的外延有關，專家能調整注意力的部署來改變訊息的權重；3.知覺轉化與身體整體經驗有關，專家能耦合不同感官媒介的訊息，讓觀察帶有本體感或將觸覺視覺化。
本研究關注費登奎斯方法的歷史與未來，揭開身心實踐相關論述與科學發現的糾纏關係。本研究藉由Shaun Gallagher對身體意象(body image)和身體基模(body schema)的概念區分，重新理解費登奎斯方法中的自我意象(self image)，並釐清覺察、意識、注意力、意圖等容易混淆的相關概念。接著，預測程序理論(Predictive Processing)補足身體意象與身體基模的互動機制，以偏誤校正與精簡控制的平衡為核心，進一步解釋動中覺察(Awareness Through Movement)的教學策略，譬如注意力、想像力、限制與協同。最後，預測程序理論藉由將行動、知覺與認知看作是同一機制，理解功能整合(Functional Integration)如何是一種探問的方法，提供藉由相互預測增進自我調節的策略。

以文找文

This research focuses on the theory and practice of the Feldenkrais Method. Through the dual perspectives of the researcher as a practitioner, this research investigates the process of perceptual transformation from beginner to expert during skill acquisition and provides practical suggestions from enactive cognition. Taking three principles of enactive, extended and embodied, this research suggests that 1. Perception transformation is related to action. Experts can get adequate information by changing the ways of doing; 2. Perception transformation is related to the extension of attention and cognition. Experts can modify the deployment of attention to change the value of information; 3. Perception transformation is related to whole-body experience. Experts can have coupled information from different sensory modalities such as observation with proprioception or tactile with visualization.
This study focuses on the history and future of the Feldenkrais method, uncovering the entanglement between discourses of somatic practices with scientific discoveries. Following Shaun Gallagher's conceptual distinction between body image and body schema, this study re-understands the self image in the Feldenkrais Method and clarifies easily confusing concepts such as awareness, consciousness, attention and intention. Furthermore, Predictive Processing (PP) complements the interactive mechanism between body image and body schema. By focusing on the balance between error minimization and simplifying control, PP further explains the teaching strategies of Awareness Through Movement, such as attention, imagination, constraints, and synergy. Finally, PP understands how Functional Integration is a method of inquiry by viewing action, perception, and cognition as the same mechanism, providing strategies to enhance self-regulation by reciprocal prediction.

以文找文

（一）英文參考資料

Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system. Brain Structure and Function, 218(3), 611-643.
Ataria, Y., Tanaka, S., & Gallagher, S. (2021). Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. Oxford University Press.
Barrett, L. F., & Simmons, W. K. (2015). Interoceptive predictions in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(7), 419-429.
Beringer, E. (2001). Self-image. The Feldenkrais Journal, No.13,33-38.
Berthoz, A. (2000). The brain's sense of movement. Harvard University Press.
Berthoz, A. (2012). Simplexity. Yale University Press.
Blakemore, S., Wolpert, D., & Frith, C. (2000). Why can't you tickle yourself? Neuroreport, 11(11), R11-R16.
Brown, H., Friston, K., & Bestmann, S. (2011). Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation. Front Psychol. 2011; 2, Article 218.
Chabris, C. F., & Simons, D. (2010). The invisible gorilla: and other ways our intuition deceives us. HarperCollins.
Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19.
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235-296.
De Preester, H., & Knockaert, V. (2005). Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
De Vignemont, F. (2010). Body schema and body image—Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia, 48(3), 669-680.
Engel, A. K., Friston, K. J., & Kragic, D. (2015). The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science. MIT Press.
Feldenkrais, M. (1972). Awareness through movement. New York: Harper and Row.
Feldenkrais, M. (1993). Body awareness as healing therapy: The case of Nora. Frog Books.
Feldenkrais, M. (2002). The potent self: A study of spontaneity and compulsion. Frog Books.
Feldenkrais, M. (2011). Embodied wisdom: The collected papers of Moshe Feldenkrais. North Atlantic Books.
Feldenkrais, M. (2013). Body and mature behaviour: A study of anxiety, sex, gravitation and learning. Routledge.
Feldenkrais, M. (1980). Learn to Learn: A Manual to Make the Recorded Lessons Easier to Grasp and to Help You to Make the Most of Them when Listening. Feldenkrais Resources.
Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127-138.
Gallagher, S. (1995). Body schema and intentionality. The Body and the Self, 225-244.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Clarendon Press.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.
Ginot, I. (2012). Body Schema and Body Image: at the crossroad of somatics and social work. Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices, 3(1-2), 151-165.
Ginsburg, C. (1999). Body-image, movement and consciousness: Examples from a somatic practice in the Feldenkrais Method. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), 79-91.
Ginsberg, C. (2010). The Intelligence of Moving Bodies. AWAREing Press.
Hanakawa, T. (2016). Organizing motor imageries. Neuroscience Research, 104, 56-63.
Hanna, T. (1986). What is somatics. Somatics: Magazine-Journal of the Bodily Arts and Sciences, 5(4), 4-8.
Haseman, B. (2006). A manifesto for performative research. Media International Australia, 118(1), 98-106.
Hebb, D. O. (2005). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Psychology Press.
Hohwy, J. (2012). Attention and conscious perception in the hypothesis testing brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 96.
Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. OUP Oxford.
James, W. (1922). Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking. Longmans, Green and Co.
Kohler, I. (1962). Experiments with goggles. Scientific American, 206(5), 62-73.
Kohler, I. (1963). The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. Psychological Issues.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.
Penfield, W., & Rasmussen, T. (1950). The cerebral cortex of man; a clinical study of localization of function. Macmillan.
Pitron, V., Alsmith, A., & de Vignemont, F. (2018). How do the body schema and the body image interact? Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 352-358.
Poerksen, B. (2004). The certainty of uncertainty: Dialogues introducing constructivism. Imprint Academic.
Profeta, K. (2015). Dramaturgy in Motion : At Work on Dance and Movement Performance. University of Wisconsin Press.
Reese, M. (1999). About Moshé Feldenkrais . https://jerrykarzen.com/.
Reese, M. (2015). Moshe Feldenkrais - a Life in Movement. Feldenkraisresources.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Brass, M. (2015). How kinesthetic motor imagery works: a predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 109(1-3), 53-63.
Rywerant, Y. (2003). The Feldenkrais method: Teaching by handling. Basic Health Publications, Inc.
Rywerant, Y. (2008). Corollary discharge–the forgotten link: Remarks on the bodymind problem. Freeperson Press.
Rywerant, Y. (2007). How to plan an FI? What is the thinking behind the doing? How to teach it? Unpublished manuscript.
Schilder, P. (1950). The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. International University Press.
Seth, A. K. (2014). A predictive processing theory of sensorimotor contingencies: Explaining the puzzle of perceptual presence and its absence in synesthesia. Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(2), 97-118.
Stamenov, M. (2005). Body schema, body image, and mirror neurons. In H. De Preester, & V. Knockaert (Eds.), Body Image and Body Schema: Interdisciplinary perspectives on the body (pp. 21-43). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. MIT press.
Varela, F. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(4), 330-349.
Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999). The view from within: first-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
Watson, A. L. (2017). Multisensory integration, predictive coding and the Bayesian brain: reintegrating the body image and body schema distinction into cognitive science. The University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis.
Wiese, W., & Metzinger, T. (2017). Vanilla PP for philosophers: A primer on predictive processing. https://philpapers.org/rec/WIEVPF

（二）中文參考資料

費登奎斯（Moshe Feldenkrais）（1972/2017）。動中覺察。心靈工坊。
費登奎斯（Moshe Feldenkrais）（1981/2016）。費解的顯然。心靈工坊。
費登奎斯（Moshe Feldenkrais）（2010/2017）。身體的智慧。張老師。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	身體意象於臨床護理之應用

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫