臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：《紅樓夢》霍克斯與楊憲益、戴乃迭英譯本中的俚語翻譯策略研究
作者：黃美娟
作者(外文)：HUANG, MEI-CHUAN
校院名稱：輔仁大學
系所名稱：跨文化研究所比較文學與跨文化研究博士班
指導教授：康士林
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2023
主題關鍵詞：紅樓夢；霍克斯；楊憲益；戴乃迭；概念隱喻理論；心理空間理論；隱喻翻譯模型；Hongloumeng；David Hawkes；Yang Xianyi；Gladys Yang；Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT)；Mental Space Theory (MST)；Metaphor Translation Model
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
本論文比較《紅樓夢》霍克斯 (David Hawkes) 譯本及楊憲益、戴乃迭 (Yang Xianyi and Gladys Yang) 譯本前八十回中使用俚語最多的三人王熙鳳、賈寶玉及劉姥姥對話中的俚語翻譯策略。首先爬梳三人物的俚語典故並進行文本及語料分析，發現在俚語使用上，王熙鳳貶低對手、彰顯自身；賈寶玉厭惡成年男性、歌頌少女；劉姥姥謙卑自我、讚揚賈府。俚語在《紅樓夢》對話中的功能除一般俚語的口語化、排外、幽默等特性外，更具有表達人物情緒、謀略運用、宗教寓意、伏筆、讖語及不寫之寫之功能。
在翻譯策略上，由於俚語屬文化詞 (culture-specific items)，本研究先檢視Baker (1992) 的詞層不對等翻譯策略 (Translation Strategies for Non-equivalent Words)，發現三人物俚語在霍譯本和楊譯本中最多使用翻譯策略均為「以相關文字翻譯」(paraphrasing using related words)，其他多項翻譯策略從缺。在原文中，俚語有大量譬喻用法，王熙鳳、賈寶玉及劉姥姥俚語中的譬喻使用佔98%、80%及81%。由於隱喻在俚語中的高度出現及譬喻翻譯分類模型較為缺乏，筆者根據語意學提出譬喻翻譯模型 (Metaphor Translation Model)，將隱喻翻譯分為1.不使用譬喻翻譯；2.相同譬喻翻譯；3.同種類譬喻翻譯；4.上位詞譬喻翻譯；5.跨種類譬喻翻譯，發現兩譯本譬喻翻譯策略均依序為：相同譬喻翻譯、不使用譬喻翻譯、跨種類譬喻翻譯、同種類譬喻翻譯及上位詞譬喻翻譯。
接著，本研究以Lakoff and Johnson (1980)的概念譬喻理論 (Conceptual Metaphor Theory)分析三人物之俚語譬喻，發現王熙鳳多使用實體譬喻 (entity metaphor) 中的「人是動物」 (HUMAN IS ANIMAL)、賈寶玉多使用「人是物品」(HUMAN IS OBJECT) 譬喻，劉姥姥則不特定。若干牽涉到歷史典故、《紅樓夢》小說人物互動及深層涵義相互映射，無法以概念譬喻理論分析者，則以 Fauconnier (1994, 1997) 的心理空間理論 (Mental Space Theory)及Fauconnier and Turner (2002) 的空間融合理論 (Blending Theory)分析俚語心理空間、《紅樓夢》心理空間、典故心理空間、譯者心理空間及深層涵義心理空間之互動。讀者的文學、歷史及語言知識越高，能理解的心理空間就越豐富。研究發現不同翻譯策略決定譯者心理空間的位置：直譯時與俚語心理空間重疊、譯出典故時譯者心理空間落在典故心理空間、譯者解釋俚語深層涵義時落在深層語義空間。由於兩譯本譯者多使用相同譬喻翻譯，因此譯者心理空間多與俚語心理空間重疊。兩譯本譯者均未在俚語翻譯中直接指涉《紅樓夢》文本中之人事物，因此譯者心理空間未與《紅樓夢》心理空間重合。
此外，漢語俚語時常用字精簡，根據Fillmore (1985) 的框架理論，源文母語讀者基於語言文化知識可自然產生心理空間映射，而《紅樓夢》兩譯本在譯文中均自動補足源語缺漏之語意項以利讀者創造出相應的心理空間，並利於情節之理解，讓讀者產生最大的閱讀樂趣。整體而言，兩譯本在俚語翻譯上均傾向維持俚語原貌，少有文化替代 (cultural substitution) 情形。
This dissertation undertakes a comparative analysis of the slang translation strategies employed in Hawkes’ and the Yangs’ translations of Hongloumeng (hereafter HLM), focusing on the characters Wang Xifeng, Jia Baoyu, and Liu Laolao, who most frequently utilize slang expressions in their dialogues within the first eighty chapters. The research begins by organizing the allusions and conducting literary and corpus analyses of the slang expressions used by the three characters. It is observed that Wang Xifeng employs slang to belittle opponents and elevate herself; Jia Baoyu expresses disdain for men and extols unmarried young women, while Liu Laolao employs slang to humble herself and glorify the Jia family. Slang in HLM serves not only colloquial purposes, excluding other subgroup members, and providing humor, but it also serves functions such as expressing characters’ emotions, strategic manipulation, parables, foreshadowing, prophecy, and writing without writing.
Regarding translation strategies, as slang represents culturally specific items, this study first examines Baker’s (1992) “Translation Strategies for Non-equivalent Words”. It is found that the most frequently used translation strategies employed by the three characters in Hawkes’ and the Yangs’ translations involve paraphrasing using related words, while many other translation strategies are seldom employed. The original text contains numerous metaphorical uses within the slang expressions, with metaphors accounting for 98% in Wang Xifeng’s slang, 80% in Jia Baoyu’s, and 81% in Liu Laolao’s. Due to the high occurrence of metaphor in slang and the absence of appropriate models for metaphor translation, the author proposes a semantics-based Metaphor Translation Model, which categorizes metaphor translation into five types: 1) Translation without using metaphors, 2) Translation with the same metaphor, 3) Translation with a metaphor of the same category, 4) Translating metaphor with a hypernym, and 5) Translation with a cross-category metaphor. It is found that the metaphor translation strategies employed by the two translations follow the order of: Translation with the same metaphor, Translation without using metaphors, Translation with a cross-category metaphor, Translation with a metaphor of the same category, and Translating metaphor with a hypernym.
Next, this research employs Lakoff and Johnson’s (1980) Conceptual Metaphor Theory to conduct an analysis of the slang metaphors employed by the three characters. The findings reveal that Wang Xifeng frequently utilizes the “HUMAN IS ANIMAL” metaphor, Jia Baoyu employs the “HUMAN IS OBJECT” metaphor within the entity metaphor, while Liu Laolao does not exhibit a specific pattern. For metaphors involving mutual mappings of historical allusions, interactions among characters in HLM, and underlying meanings, the author turns to Fauconnier’s (1994, 1997) Mental Space Theory and Fauconnier and Turner’s (2002) Blending Theory. These theoretical frameworks facilitate an examination of the interplay among the mental spaces associated with slang, HLM, allusions, underlying meanings, and the translations. The depth of the readers’ literary, historical, and linguistic literacy greatly influences their comprehension and engagement with these mental spaces during the reading process. Furthermore, the chosen translation strategy determines the positioning of the translation’s mental space. A direct translation aligns the translator’s mental space with that of the slang. Elaboration on the underlying meaning situates the translation within the underlying meaning mental space. When the translation explicitly reveals corresponding individuals and locales in HLM, it aligns with the mental space of the novel itself. Based on this analysis, it is apparent that the translation’s mental space never overlaps with that of HLM, as the slang translation never explicitly refers to the novel’s characters and settings. It can be observed that most of Hawkes’ and the Yangs’ translations are consistent with the mental space of the slang expressions.
Certain Chinese slang expressions commonly employed are characterized by conciseness and abbreviation. According to Fillmore’s (1985) Frame Theory, native readers of the original text possess the innate ability to naturally generate mental space mappings based on their language and cultural knowledge. Both translations of HLM fulfill the missing semantic components of the slang expressions, enabling readers to establish corresponding mappings in the translations and enhancing their comprehension of the narrative, thereby providing readers with an optimal reading experience. Overall, the two translations strive to preserve the original form of the slang expressions during the translation process, with less cultural substitutions.
Works Cited
Primary Sources:
Cao Xueqin. The Story of the Stone. Vols.1-3 translated by David Hawkes, Vols. 4-5
translated by John Minford, Penguin Books, 1973-1986, Indiana UP, 1979-1987.
---. A Dream of Red Mansions. Translated by Yang Xianyi and Gladys Yang, 3 vols,
Foreign Language Press, 1978-1980, Hong Kong Commercial Press, 1986.

Secondary Sources:
Al-Hassnawi, Ali. “A Cognitive Approach to Translation Metaphors.” Translation Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, 2007, https://translationjournal.net/journal/41metaphor.htm.
Ardali, Mortaza Taheri, Mohammad Bagheri, and Reza Eidy. “Towards a New Model of Metaphor Translation: A Cognitive Approach.” Iranian Journal of Translation Studies, vol. 11, 2013, pp. 35-52.
Baker, Mona. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. Routledge, 1992.
Croft, William and Alan Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge UP, 2004.
“David Hawkes Repository.” The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library, https://repository.lib.cuhk.edu.hk/tc/collection/hawkes
Klerk, Vivian. “Slang, Sociology.” Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2006, pp. 407-412.
Fauconnier, Gilles. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge UP, 1997.
---. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge UP, 1994.
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and
the Mind’s Hidden Complexities Basic Books. 2002.
Fillmore, Charles J. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quadernidi
Semantica, 6, 1985, pp.222-54.
---. “Frame Semantics.” Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by the Linguistics
Society of Korea, Hanshin, 1982, pp. 111–137.
---. “Frame Semantics.” Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Reading, edited by D.
Geeraerts, De Gruyter Mouton, 2006, pp. 373-400.
Gile, Daniel. Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. John Benjamins, 2009.
Gittings, John. “Obituary: David Hawkes”. The Guardian, 25 August 2009. www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/features.php?sea
Grady Joseph E., Todd Oakley, and Seana Coulson. “Blending and Metaphor.” Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. and Gerard G. Steen, John Benjamins, 1999, pp. 101–124.
Harper Collins, American Heritage College Dictionary of the English Language, 2022, www.ahdictionary.com/.
Kovecses, Zoltán. Metaphor in Culture-Universality and Variation. Cambridge UP, 2007.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. U of Chicago P, 1980.
Lighter, Jonathan E. Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang. Random House, 1994.
Mandelblit, Nili. “The Cognitive View of Metaphor and its Implications for Translation Theory.” Translation and Meaning, Part 3, edited by M. Thalen and B. Lewandowska-Tomasczyk, Maastricht UP, 1995, pp.482-495.
Mattiello, Elisa. “The Pervasiveness of Slang in Standard and Non-Standard English.” Mots Palabras Words, 6, 7-41. 2005.
Mieder, Wolfgang “The Wit of One, and the Wisdom of Many: General Thoughts on the Nature of the Proverb.” Proverbs are Never out of Season: Popular Wisdom in the Modern Age. Oxford UP, 1993, pp.3–40.
Newmark, Peter. A Textbook of Translation. Prentice-Hall International, 1988.
Ramos, Carolina. “High Context.” Encyclopedia of Diversity and Social Justice, 2014.
Robinson, Peter. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. Routledge, 2008.
Saal, Elvis. “The Persuasive Effect of Teenager Slang in Print-based HIV Messages.” 79 F&N Eigen Beheer, 2009.
Saeed, John I. Semantics. 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Spolsky, Bernard. Sociolinguistics. Oxford UP, 1998.
Tsai, Yiling. A Preliminary Study on the Chinese Translation Strategies for Hebrew
Metaphors in the Old Testament: Using Chinese Union Version and Revised
Chinese Union Version as Examples. Wu-Nan, 2013.
Venuti, Lawrence. The Translator's Invisibility. Routledge, 1995.
Wu Jingzi. The Scholars (Rulin waishi). Translated by Yang Xianyi and Gladys Yang. Renmin, 2011.
Wu, Yaping. An Analysis of Slang Translation Strategies in the Chinese Version of Stephen King’s Novel Duma Key. National Yunlin University of Science and
Technology, MA thesis, 2014.

Works in Chinese
Primary Sources
Aristotle亞里斯多德. Shixue詩學Poetics. Translated by Chen Zhongmei陳中梅.Taiwan Commercial Press, 2001.
Cao, Xueqin曹雪芹. Hongloumeng紅樓夢. China Times, 2016.
Liu, Xie劉勰. Wenxin Diaolong文心雕龍. Taiwan Kai Ming, 1958.

Secondary Sources
Ahrens, Kathleen. “Gainian piyu概念譬喻Conceptual Metaphor.” Yuyan yu renzhi語言與認知 Language and Cognition, edited by Su Yiwen 蘇以文 and Bi Yong’e 畢永娥. National Taiwan UP, 2009, pp. 229-262.
Cai, Yaqi蔡雅琪. Genuo xiaoshuo kudong zhi zhongyi ji pinglun葛諾小說酷冬之中
譯暨評論 A Harsh Winter, Novel by Raymond Queneau, Chinese Translation and Commentary. Fu Jen Catholic U, MA thesis, 2001.
Chen, Yaoling陳瑤玲. “Biyu yi, biyu ci yu cidian shiyi--cong tishici “biyu” wuyong
tanqi 比喻義、比喻詞語與辭典釋義——從提示詞「比喻」誤用談起 Meanings, Vocabularies, and Mistaken Explanations of Some Analogies in the Dictionaries.” Journal of Chinese Literature of Providence University, no. 6, 2020, pp.1-30.
Dang, Zhengsheng黨爭勝. Hongloumeng yingyi yishu bijiao yanjiu: jiyu Huokesi he
Yang Xianyi yiben紅樓夢英譯藝術比較研究：基於霍克思和楊憲益譯本A Comparative Study of the Art of English Translation of Hongloumeng: Based on the Translations of Hawkes and the Yangs. Peking UP, 2012.
Fan, Guili范瑋麗, Ta fanyi le zhengge Zhongguo: fanyijia Yang Xianyi yu Yingji
taitai Gladys de chuanqi aiqing yu rensheng他翻譯了整個中國:翻譯家楊憲益與英籍太太Gladys的傳奇愛情與人生He Translated the Whole of China: the Legendary Love and Life of Translator Yang Xianyi and His British Wife Gladys. Azure Books, 2015.
Fan, Shengyu范聖宇. Hongloumeng guankui: Yingyi, yuyan yu wenhua紅樓夢管窺：
英譯、語言與文化A Glimpse of Hongloumeng: English Translation, Language and Culture. China Social Sciences Press, 2004.
Feng, Qinghua馮慶華. Muyu wenhuaxia de yizhe fengge: Hongloumeng Huokesi yu
Minfude yiben yanjiu母語文化下的譯者風格：紅樓夢霍克斯與閔福德譯本研究Translation Styles as a Product of the Native Language Culture: A Survey of the English Versions of Hongloumeng. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 2008.
Huang, Lizhen黃麗貞. Hanyu sizige jiaoxue chutan漢語四字格教學初探A Study of
Chinese Four-Character Idiomatic Expressions. National Taiwan Normal U, MA thesis, 2013.
Huang, Qingxuan黃慶萱. Xiucixue修辭學Rhetoric. San Min, 1986.
Jiang, Fan江帆. Taxiang de Shitouji: Hongloumeng bainian yingyishi yanjiu他鄉的石
頭記：紅樓夢百年英譯史研究The Story of the Stone in a Foreign Land: A Study of the Centenary History of English Translation of Hongloumeng. Nankai UP, 2014.
Jiang, Qihuang姜其煌. Oumei Hongxue歐美紅學European and American Redology. Elephant Press, 2005.
Lei, Yin雷音. Yang Xianyi zhuan楊憲益傳Biography of Yang Xianyi. Ming Pao, 2007.
Li, Lingling李伶伶. Yijie taidou: Yang Xiangyi zhuan譯界泰斗︰楊憲益傳Master inTranslation: Biography of Yang Xianyi. Jiangsu People’s Publishing, 2011.
Liu, Jing劉婧. Shehui fuhaoxue shiyuxia Hongloumeng wenhua neirong de yingyi社會符號學視域下紅樓夢文化內容的英譯English Translation of the Cultural Content
of Hongloumeng from the Perspective of Social Semiotics. Central Compilation &
Translation Press, 2014.
Liu, Shicong劉士聰, editor. Honglou yipping—Hongloumeng fanyi yanjiu lunwenji紅樓譯評─紅樓夢翻譯研究論文集Hongloumeng Translation Review: A Collection of Essays on Translation Studies of Hongloumeg. Nankai UP, 2004.
Liu, Suxun劉素勳. “Lun Huokesi de Hongloumeng wenhua fanyi lunli論霍克斯的
紅樓夢文化翻譯倫理On the Ethics of Cultural Translation of Hawkes’The Story of the Stone.” Studies of Translation and Interpretation, vol. 13, 2010, pp. 57-90.
Luo, Xuanmin羅選民. “Hongloumeng yiming zhi kao: huwenxing de shijiao紅樓夢
譯名之考：互文性的視角An Examination of the Translation of Hongloumeng: from the Perspective of Intertextuality.” Chinese Translators Journal, vol. 6, 2021, pp.111-117.
Ou, Lijuan歐麗娟. Daguan Honglou. Mushen juan大觀紅樓.母神卷The Grand View
Red Mansion. Mother Goddess Volume. National Taiwan UP, 2015.
Ou, Lijuan歐麗娟. Honglou yimeng: Jia Baoyu yu ci jinchai紅樓一夢 :賈寶玉與次金
釵A Dream of Red Mansions: Jia Baoyu and the Second Twelve Beauties. 1st edition, Linking, 2017.
Pei, Mario白馬禮. Yuyan de gushi語言的故事The Stories of Languages. Translated by
Li Mubai李慕白, Taiwan Commercial Press, 1989.
Song, Qi宋淇. Hongloumeng xiyouji: Xiping Hongloumeng xin yingyi紅樓夢西遊記 :細評紅樓夢新英譯Hongloumeng’s Journey to the West: A Study of Its English
Translations. Linking, 1976.
Wang, Hongyin王宏印. Hongloumeng shi ci qu fu yingyi biaojiao yanjiu紅樓夢詩
詞曲賦英譯比較研究Comparative Study on the English Translation of Hongloumeng Poems, Ci, Lyrics, and Fu. Dalian Maritime UP, 2015.
Wang, Jiao and Chen, Kepei王姣, 陳可培. “Cong fanyi lunli fenxi Hongloumeng
liangge ying yiben從翻譯倫理分析紅樓夢兩個英譯本Analysis of Two English Translations of Hongloumeng from the Perspective of Translation Ethics.” Journal of Chungchou University, vol. 25, no. 5, 2008, pp.78-80.
Xiao, Jiayan蕭家燕. Hongloumeng gainian yinyu de yingyi yanjiu紅樓夢概念隱喻的
英譯研究A Conceptual Metaphor Study on the English Translation of
Hongloumeng. China Social Press, 2009.
Xie, Jianxiong謝健雄. “Hanyu chengyu qinggan piyu zhi gainian moshi yu yuyan jiegou漢語成語情感譬喻之概念模式與語言結構The Conceptual Models and Linguistic Structures of Emotional Metaphors in Chinese Idioms.” UST Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 2, 2006, pp. 43-65.
Xu, Shen許慎and Xu Xian徐鉉, editors. Shuowen jiezi fu jianzi說文解字附檢字Explaining Chinese Characters with Checking Characters. Zhonghua, 2004.
Yu, Guangxiong余光雄, Yingyu yuyanxue gailun英語語言學概論Introduction to English Linguitics. Bookman, 1986.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：263（臺灣：240，外國：23） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2459241 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68261182
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上