:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術型高中教師人格特質與有效教學行為關係之研究
作者:曾耀霖
作者(外文):TSENG,YAO-LIN
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育與技術學系
指導教授:陳德發
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:技術型高中教師人格特質有效教學量表發展Teachers in Vocational High SchoolsPersonality TraitsEffective Teaching BehaviorScale Development
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
有別於學術類科教師,技術類科教師與學生之間師徒傳承意味濃厚,教師除傳遞專業知識外,更應著重自身人格特質於執行專業過程中。因此,本研究旨在探討技術類科教師人格特質與教學行為之關聯,並將透過結構方程模型進行驗證,以支持本研究假說。利用有效教學行為自編量表(五尺度四間格
)與五大人格特質自評表(The Big Five Inventory-44)進行全國網路發放與調查,發放的網路問卷(以點擊率計算)共612份,填答後提交送出之問卷為458份,刪除無效問卷24份,其有效問卷共為434份。有效回收率為70.92%,有效填答率為94.76%。並將透過SPSS 24.0等統計套裝軟體進行統計描述性分析、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、驗證性因素分析、結構方程式等統計方式進行結果分析。經分析後,所獲結論如下:
壹、有效教學行為現況中,受試者最認同的前三項分別是:
(1)能給予較易達成的學習目標;(2)透過結合生活實例;(3)建立互動的機制。故由上開結果可見
藉由短期目標的達成,建立學生信心,或透過與學生互動,將學習內容與生活結合,加深學生印
象,為本研究樣本中最為顯著的有效教學行為。
貳、單因子變異數分析可見不同「年齡」之教師於「教學中」行為有所差異;不同服務年資於教師「教
學中」、「教學後」行為有所差異;至於「不同任教科目」之「教學中」行為亦呈現統計差異。據
上述結果推估,除教師本身年齡與年資之外,不同任教科目之間的教學中行為,可能根據科目之間
的性質不同而有所差異。更重要的是—「不同教育程度」的教師與有效教學行為無顯著差異。因
此,研究推論職業類科教師之有效教學行為應與經驗成熟度較有關聯,而非學歷。
參、教師之五大人格特質與有效教學之結構方程式模型中發現,教師的「外向實踐性」於「親和樂群
性」為重要影響有效教學的人格特質。而單因子變異數分析中亦發現且不同「性別」之教師於
「親和樂群性」、「情緒穩定性」之人格特質上有所差異。
肆、教師之人格特質與有效教學行為,彼此間關係成立。
Different from teachers of general subjects, teachers and students of technical subjects have a strong sense of inheritance between teachers and students. Thus, this study aimed to explore the relationship between personality traits and teaching behaviors of technical teachers, and conducted double validation through structural equation modeling to support the hypothesis of this research. First of all, this study uses the Self-editing Scale of Effective Teaching Behavior (Five Scales and Four Grids) and the Big Five Personality Traits Self-Rating Scale (The Big Five Inventory-44), appropriateness of the scale.
A total of 612 online questionnaires (calculated by click-through rate) were distributed, 458 questionnaires were submitted and sent after completion, 24 invalid questionnaires were deleted, and a total of 434 valid questionnaires were obtained. The effective recovery rate was 70.92%, and the effective answer rate was 94.76%. Statistical descriptive analysis, t-test, single factor analysis of variance, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation and other statistical methods will be used to analyze the results through statistical package software such as SPSS 24.0. After analysis, the conclusions obtained are as follows:
1.The results show that the top three items that the respondents agree with the
most in the current situation of effective teaching behaviors are: (1) to give
learning goals that are easier to achieve; (2) to combine life examples; (3)
The mechanism of establishing interaction. Therefore, from the above results,
it can be seen that the achievement of short-term goals, building students'
confidence, or interacting with students, combining learning content with
life, and deepening students' impressions are the most significant effective
teaching behaviors in this research sample.
2.On the other hand, through one-way analysis of variance, it can be seen that
teachers of different "ages" have different behaviors in "teaching"; teachers
with different years of service in "teaching", "after teaching” behaviors were
different; as for the "in teaching” behavior of "different teaching subjects"
Statistical differences are presented. According to the above results, in
addition to the age and seniority of the teachers themselves, the teaching
behavior between different subjects may vary according to the nature of the
subjects. More importantly - teachers with "different educational levels" did
not differ significantly from effective teaching behaviors.
3.In reference to the current situation of the five major personality traits of
teachers and the structural equation model of effective teaching, it is found
that teachers' "extroverted practicality" and "friendly and gregarious" are
personality traits that have an important impact on effective teaching. The
one-way variance analysis also found that teachers of different "genders" had
differences in the personality traits of "agreeableness" and "emotional
stability"
4.The relationship between teachers' personality traits and effective teaching
behaviors is established.
壹、中文部分
王筱婷(2016)。人格特質對股票投資續擴承諾行為與績效之探討(未出版之碩士論文)。南華大學,嘉義縣。
李仁豪、鍾芯瑜(2020)。中文版簡式「五大人格量表」BFI的發展。測驗學刊,67(4),271 – 299。
李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。新北市:心理出版社。
林進材(2000)。有效教學—理論與策略。臺北市:五南文化出版。
林清山(2000)。學習理論與教學心理學的互動。教育研究集刊,45,1-13。
柯澍馨、林亭如(2007)。台灣地區高職餐飲科教師效能信念與有效教學行為之研究。學校行政,51,72-92。
徐諶(1995)。教材多元並非教學萬靈丹-黃政傑教授談教材多元化的先決條件。師友月刊,314,6-8。
張春興(2001)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
張淑惠、蔡銘修(2019)。讓教室變成遊戲室-以即時回饋系統輔助技能檢定學科模擬測驗。臺灣教育評論月刊
,8(4),98-102。
張蕊苓(1999)。兒童學習動機內化歷程中的影響因素探討。花蓮師院學報,9,33-60。
陳木金(1997)。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
教育部統計資訊(2020)。歷年度各級教育簡況:表A1 - 2 各級學校專任教師人數https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Education_Statistics/110/110edu_EXCEL.htm
許美瑞(2007)。台灣教師與廚師對中餐烹調技術士技能檢定意見之調查分析。餐旅暨家政學刊,4(4),315-332。
黃文振(1996)。落實技能檢定開展職業證照制度新紀元。就業與訓練,14,92-95。
黃家杰、陳美芳、陳長益、李乙明、呂金燮(2010)。教師區分性教學行為觀察量表(學生版)之編製。特殊教育研究學刊,35(1),63-82。
曾淑惠(2008)。職業類科教師有效教學的關鍵。教育研究與發展期刊,4(2),205-230。
蕭錫齊(2000)。技能檢定委託相關機構團體辦理之行性研究。台北勞工委員會職業練委託研究報告。
謝錫湖(2002)。技能檢定術科測驗對高職模具科技能學習影響之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學,臺北市。
蘇景進(2019)。探討高職學生技能檢定情形及高職優質化對技能檢定之提升效果。台灣教育,716,59-70。

貳、英文部分
Abrahams, L., Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., Santos, D., Kyllonen, P., John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2019). Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts. Psychological assessment, 31(4), 460-473.
Adams, E. (2001). A proposed causal model of vocational teacher stress. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 53(2), 223-246.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i-171
Becker, R., & Schubert, F. (2011). Die Rolle von primären und sekundären Herkunftseffekten für Bildungschancen von Migranten im deutschen Schulsystem. Integration durch Bildung (pp. 161-194). Springer.
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
Bergold, S., & Steinmayr, R. (2018). Personality and intelligence interact in the prediction of academic achievement. Journal of Intelligence, 6(2), 27-32.
Blazar, D. (2016). Teacher and teaching effects on students' academic performance, attitudes, and behaviors. Harvard University.
Blossfeld, G. J., Blossfeld, P. N., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2019). A sociological perspective on education as a lifelong process. In Research handbook on the sociology of education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Borich, G. D. (2016). Observation skills for effective teaching: research-based practice. Routledge.
Borkenau, P. (1988). The multiple classification of acts and the big five factors of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 337-352.
Brandt, N. D., Lechner, C. M., Tetzner, J., & Rammstedt, B. (2020). Personality, cognitive ability, and academic performance: Differential associations across school subjects and school tracks. Journal of personality, 88(2), 249-265.
Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American psychologist, 41(10), 1069-1077.
Brunello, G., & Checchi, D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic policy, 22(52), 782-861.
Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (1999). Methods for effective teaching.
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 56, 453-484.
Cattell, R. B. (1957). Personality and motivation structure and measurement.
Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16 PF): In clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test. Institute for personality and ability testing.
Celikkaya, T., & Filoglu, S. (2014). Attitudes of Social Studies Teachers toward Value and Values Education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 1551-1556.
Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2015). Personality: Theory and research. John Wiley & Sons.
Chilcoat, G. W., & Ligon, J. (1992). Studying the Progressive Era through Melodrama as the Method. Georgia Social Science Journal, 23(1), 10-17.
Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (neo-pi-r). Sage Publications, Inc.
Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1989). NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 3.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R). Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, FL.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol, 81(2), 322-331.
Cummins, J. (2013). Immigrant students’ academic achievement: Understanding the intersections between research, theory and policy. Herausforderung Bildungssprache–und wie man sie meistert, 19-41.
De Fruyt, F., Wille, B., & John, O. P. (2015). Employability in the 21st century: Complex (interactive) problem solving and other essential skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 276-281.
Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13-21.
Digman, J. M. (1989). Five robust trait dimensions: Development, stability, and utility. Journal of personality, 57(2), 195-214.
Donaldson, M., Mavrogordato, M., Youngs, P., & Dougherty, S. (2020). Appraising Principal Evaluation and Development. In Exploring Principal Development and Teacher Outcomes (pp. 56-68): Routledge.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson, R. (2019). How does education depend on social origin? In Research handbook on the sociology of education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (1989). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual alternatives. National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull, 116(3), 429-456.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Gupta, A. (2015). Foundations for value education in engineering: The Indian experience. Science and engineering ethics, 21(2), 479-504.
Gustafsson, J.-E., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions.
Hallam, S., & Ireson, J. (2006). Secondary school pupils' preferences for different types of structured grouping practices. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 583-599.
Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., & Glass, B. (2003). Learning to learn to teach: An``experiment''model for teaching and teacher preparation in mathematics. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 6(3), 201-222.
Houtte, M. V., Demanet, J., & Stevens, P. A. (2012). Self-esteem of academic and vocational students: Does within-school tracking sharpen the difference? Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 73-89.
Iscan, C. D. (2015). Views on values education: From teacher candidates to experienced teachers. Education, 136(2), 192-210.
John, O. P. (1990). The" Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. Handbook of personality: Theory and research.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2(1999), 102-138.
Johnson, D. P., & Whisman, M. A. (2013). Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis. Personality and individual differences, 55(4), 367-374.
Katilmis, A. (2017). Values Education as Perceived by Social Studies Teachers in Objective and Practice Dimensions. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 1231-1254.
Klein, M., Schindler, S., Pollak, R., & Müller, W. (2010). Soziale Disparitäten in der Sekundarstufe und ihre langfristige Entwicklung. In Bildungsentscheidungen (pp. 47-73). Springer.
Kogan, I. (2019). Still a safety net? Revisiting the role of vocational education and training in school-to-work transitions in Europe. In Research handbook on the sociology of education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kovalcikiene, K., & Daukilas, S. (2018). Vocational teachers’ personality, career calling and the aspects of teaching quality. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 8(1), 39-49.
Kovalcikiene, K., & Daukilas, S. (2019). Positive emotional atmosphere or technology-based training: teachers' priorities depending on their personality. Conference: International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends.
Kovalčikienė, K., & Genevičiūtė-Janonė, G. (2018). The relationship between the vocational teachers’ personality traits and the work motivation. Tarptautinis psichologijos žurnalas: biopsichosocialinis požiūris International journal of psychology: a biopsychosocial approach. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2018, Nr. 22.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of personality and social psychology, 86(1), 148-161.
Lechner, C. M., Anger, S., & Rammstedt, B. (2019). Socio-emotional skills in education and beyond: recent evidence and future research avenues. In Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Maaz, K., Hausen, C., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2006). Stichwort: Übergänge im Bildungssystem. Erziehungswissenschaften, 9, 299-327.
McCormick, C. B., & Pressley, M. (1997). Educational psychology: Learning, instruction, assessment. Longman Publishing/Addison Wesley L.
McCormick, W. J. (1979). Teachers Can Learn to Teach More Effectively. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 59-60.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81-90.
McElvany, N., Ferdinand, H. D., Gebauer, M. M., Bos, W., Huelmann, T., Köller, O., & Schöber, C. (2018). Attainment-aspiration gap in students with a migration background: The role of self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 159-166.
Miciuliene, R., Kovalcikiene, K., & Daukilas, S. (2020). Vocational Teacher's Inclination to Impart Values in Vocational Training: The Importance of Pedagogical-Didactical and Psychological Factors. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(2), 350-364.
Nießen, D., Danner, D., Spengler, M., & Lechner, C. M. (2020). Big Five Personality Traits Predict Successful Transitions From School to Vocational Education and Training: A Large-Scale Study. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1827.
Niesel, R., & Griebel, W. (2007). Enhancing the competence of transition systems through co-construction. Informing transitions in the early years, 21-32.
Nussbaum, J. F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication education, 41(2), 167-180.
Paat, Y.-F. (2015). Children of Mexican immigrants’ aspiration-attainment gap and educational resilience. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 9(1), 37-53.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological bulletin, 135(2), 322-328.
Research, O. M. o. E., Branch, I., & Ryan, D. W. (1984). Developing a new model of teacher effectiveness.
Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 118-137.
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of personality assessment, 63(3), 506-516.
Schofield, J. W. (2006). Migration background, minority-group membership and academic achievement: Research evidence from social, educational and developmental psychology. AKI.
Schoon, I. (2010). Childhood cognitive ability and adult academic attainment: evidence from three British cohort studies. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 1(3), 241-158.
Schoon, I., & Heckhausen, J. (2019). Conceptualizing individual agency in the transition from school to work: A social-ecological developmental perspective. Adolescent Research Review, 4(2), 135-148.
Schoon, I., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2009). Transitions from school to work: Globalization, individualization, and patterns of diversity. Cambridge University Press.
Shank, G. (2008). Abductive strategies in educational research. The American Journal of Semiotics, 5(2), 275-290.
Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Social Inequality Series.
Solís, M., Romero, A., & Galvín, P. (2012). Teaching structural analysis through design, building, and testing. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 138(3), 246-253.
Spengler, M., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2013). Personality is related to educational outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from two large-scale achievement studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 613-625.
Thompson, E. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international English big-five mini-markers. Personality and individual differences, 45(6), 542-548.
Thornberg, R. (2008). The lack of professional knowledge in values education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1791-1798.
Tirri, K. (2011). Holistic school pedagogy and values: Finnish teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 159-165.
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of educational psychology, 98(4), 788-806.
Vedel, A., & Poropat, A. E. (2017). Personality and academic performance. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 1-9.
Wind, S. A., Jones, E., Bergin, C., & Jensen, K. (2019). Exploring patterns of principal judgments in teacher evaluation related to reported gender and years of experience. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 150-158.
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and concurrent validation of the IPIP Big-Five factor markers in China: Consistencies in factor structure between Internet-obtained heterosexual and homosexual samples. Personality and individual differences, 45(7), 649-654.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE