:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:再探互為主觀性:以激進構式語法分析正向反諷
作者:莊惠鈞
作者(外文):Andrew Hui-Chun Chuang
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:語言學研究所
指導教授:蘇以文
呂佳蓉
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:互為主觀性正向反諷激進構式語法語用學句法學認知語言學intersubjectivitypositive ironyRadical Construction GrammarpragmaticssyntaxCognitive Linguistics
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
本論文旨在透過激進構式語法 (Radical Construction Grammar) 為語用中之互為主觀性(intersubjectivity) 以及正向反諷 (positive irony) 間之關係提供一個新的研究模式。精確來說,本論文探討正向反諷之語用功能如何被構式化 (constructionalized),進而證明此正向反諷之構式為一“互為主觀性化之結構”(intersubjectified construction)。目前的構式語法理論多元,且多著力於能夠完整描述語言之樣貌,但卻往往在需要處理語用或大腦認知層次之階段感到力猶未逮。本研究透過分析三個特定之正向反諷構式結構 (positive-ironic constructions) 探索語言之認知機制,進而在構式語法的框架下,為語用句法研究之介面提供新的解決方法。正向反諷之使用雖曾被提及具有協助建立說話者間關係之功能,但在文獻上相較於負向反諷 (negative irony) 卻極少被討論。本論文不但由認知語言學的角度探究正向反諷,更跳脫原本只侷限在雙邊關係 (dyadic interaction) 之反諷研究,進而檢視三邊之互動關係 (triadic interaction),進一步探討互為主觀性本身如何成為正向反諷構式結構所包含之認知功能之一。每個討論反諷構式的章節都聚焦並反映一種認知機制,本論文透過三個正向反諷之構式分析,提供構式語法理論分析語用現象時之解決方法。
This doctoral dissertation presents a novel exploration into the relationship between intersubjectivity and positive irony through the lens of Radical Construction Grammar (RCG)—i.e., how a linguistic construction may encode (constructionalize) the pragmatic-discursive function of positive irony that reflects intersubjectivity as an intersubjectified construction? Despite the ambition of existing construction grammars to provide comprehensive understandings of language, these frameworks have struggled to adequately incorporate the pragmatic and cognitive (metarepresentational) dimensions of language use. By examining the cognitive mechanisms underlying three positive-ironic constructions, this study seeks to bridge the existing theoretical gap, contributing a solution to the longstanding issue of connecting syntax and pragmatics within constructionist frameworks. The central theme of the research is positive irony, an aspect within linguistics that, despite its importance in facilitating the establishment of social bonds and enhancing communicative exchanges, has received relatively limited attention in scholarly discourse. Rather than adhering to the conventional dyadic interaction analyses, this investigation extends its purview to include triadic situations, thereby promoting a more comprehensive understanding of how intersubjectivity is encapsulated in positive-ironic constructions from a cognitive-functional perspective. Each distinct construction imparts a unique contribution to solving the research questions, thereby enhancing the overall comprehension of the research topic.
Andersen, H. (2001). Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In H. Andersen (Ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress (pp. 79–93). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.11and
Anolli, L., Ciceri, R., & Infantino, M. G. (2000). Irony as a game of implicitness: Acoustic profiles of ironic communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(3), 275–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005100221723
Apperly, I. A. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “theory of mind.” Psychology Press.
Apperly, I. A. (2012). What is “theory of mind”? Concepts, cognitive processes and individual differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.676055
Aristotle. (1991). On rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published circa 350 B.C.E.)
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. Columbia University Press.
Arnon, I., Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. A. (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001
Astington, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1311
Atkin, A. (2006). Peirce’s theory of signs. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/.
Attardo, S., Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3–4), 293–347. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219029
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3
Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969
Attardo, S. (2002). Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure detection. In A. Katz, C. Cacciari, R. W. Gibbs Jr., & M. Turner (Eds.), Figurative language and thought (pp. 166–185). Oxford University Press.
Attardo, S. (2017). Theories of humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 4–17). Routledge.
Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3–4), 293–347. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. University of Texas Press.
Back, K. (1994). Conversational implicature. Mind & Language. 9(2), 124–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1994.tb00220.x
Baldick, C. (2008). The Oxford dictionary of literary terms (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199208272.001.0001
Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677
Bara, B. G. (2010). Cognitive Pragmatics: The Mental Processes of Communication. MIT Press.
Barbe, K. (1995). Irony in context. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.34
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage-Based Models of Language. University of Chicago Press.
Baron-Cohens, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 47–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x99002149
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology or mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. University of Chicago Press.
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5185–5198. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463
Beretta, A., Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2005). The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 57–65. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.006
Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. Basic Books.
Bergen, B. K., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied Construction Grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman, & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 147–190). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.08ber
Bergen, B. K., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002
Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication: The rhetorical underpinnings of the theory of signs. Continuum.
Bergs, A. T., & Dieter, S. (2001). The role of markedness in the actuation and actualization of linguistic change. In H. Andersen (Ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress (pp. 225–248). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.219.04ber
Berrendonner, A. (1981). Éléments de pragmatique linguistique. Les éditions de minuit.
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In H. Hasselgård, & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181–190). Rodopi.
Bisang, W. (1996). Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language, 20(3), 519–597. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20.3.03bis
Blackburn, S. (1994). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Blass, R. (1990). Relevance relations in discourse: A study with special reference to Sissala. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015323
Blakemore, D. (1994). Echo questions: A pragmatic account. Lingua, 4, 197–211.
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(94)90009-4
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex.
Boas, H. C., & Sag, I. A. (Eds.). (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. CSLI.
Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language–A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idioms, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2669–2683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Booth, W. C. (1974). A Rhetoric of Irony. University of Chicago Press.
Booth, W. C. (2004). The rhetoric of RHETORIC: The quest for effective communication. Blackwell.
Borenstein, M., Larry, V., Hedges, J. P., T., & Higgins, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Boxer, D., & Cortés-Conde, F. (1997). From bonding to biting: Conversational joking and identity display. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(3), 275–294. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8
Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. (1979). Three language variables in communication research: Intensity, immediacy, and diversity. Human Communication Research, 5, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1979.tb00639.x
Bradac, J. J., Bowers, J. W., & Courtright, J. A. (1982). Lexical variations in intensity, immediacy, and diversity: An axiomatic theory and causal model. In R. N. St. Clair, & H. Giles (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language (pp. 193–223). Psychology Press.
Breheny, R. (2002). The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00194
Brems, L. (2011). Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252927
Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(6), 1482–1493. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.22.6.1482
Bresnan, J. (Ed.). (1982). The mental representations of grammatical relations. MIT Press.
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Blackwell.
Brickhouse, T. C., & Smith, N. D. (2010). Socratic moral psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X12000303
Brinton, L. J. (1988). The development of English aspectual systems: Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, L. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962
Brown, R. L. J. (1980). The pragmatics of verbal irony. In R. W. Shuy, & A. Shnukal (Eds.), Language use and the uses of language (pp. 111–127). Georgetown University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Bruni, E., & Fernández, R. (2017a). Adversarial evaluation for open-domain dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2017 Conference, 284–288. ://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-5534
Bruni, E., & Fernández, R. (2017b). Adapting the DRS schema for the needs of dialogue systems. In J. Hunter, P. Yang, & H. Ji (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) at ACL 2017 (pp. 1–6). Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-2601.
Bruntsch, R., & Ruch, W. (2017), Studying irony detection beyond ironic criticism: Let’s include ironic praise. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00606
Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2005). Is there an ironic tone of voice? Language and Speech, 48(3), 257–277. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/00238309050480030101
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
Bussanich, J., & Smith, N. (2013). The Bloomsbury companion to Socrates. Bloomsbury.
Bühler, K. (1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. John Benjamins. (Original work published 1934) https://doi.org/10.1075/z.164
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9
Bybee, J. L. (2003a). Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 602–623). Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
Bybee, J. L. (2003b). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 145–167). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, J. L. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82, 711–733. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
Bybee, J. L. (2010). Language, usage, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. ://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
Bybee, J. L. (2012a). Domain-general processes as the basis for grammar. In M. Tallerman, & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 528–536). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199541119.013.0055
Bybee, J. L. (2012b). Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization (pp. 69–78). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0006
Bybee, J. L., & Beckner, C. (2009). Usage-based Theory. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 827–855). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0032
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. (Eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45
Bybee, J. L., Pagliuca, W., & Perkins, R. (1991). Back to the future. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 2, pp. 17–58). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.2
Bybee, J., & Thompson, S. (1997). Three frequency effects in syntax. Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 378–388. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293
Byrne, R. M. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(10), 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01974-5
Byrne, R. M. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
Carston, R. (1996). Metalinguistic negation and echoic use. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00109-X
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell.
Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2015). Hyperbolic language and its relation to metaphor and irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 79, 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.011
Carvalho, P., Sarmento, L., Silva, M. J., & De Oliveira, E. (2009). Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh…!!it’s “so easy”;-). In Proceedings of the 1st International CIKM workshop on topic-sentiment analysis for mass opinion, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/1651461.1651471
Champagne-Lavau, M., & Joanette, Y. (2009). Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22(5), 413–426. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.02.002
Chandler, D. (2017). Semiotics: The basics (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315311050
Chang, J. (2005). Can’t stop won’t stop: A history of the hip-hop generation. St. Martin’s Press.
Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Chen, P. (1986). Referent introducing and referent tracking in Chinese narratives (Publication No. 8621039) [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Chierchia, G., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2000). Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Childs, C. (2021). Mechanisms of grammaticalization in the variation of negative question tags. Journal of English Linguistics, 49(4), 419–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242211044837
Chisholm, R., & Feehan, T. (1977). The intent to deceive. Journal of Philosophy, 74(3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025605
Chollet, F. (2017). Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. In H. Hirschmüller, & S. Roth (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 1251–1258). IEEE. Retrieved from https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2017/papers/Chollet_Xception_Deep_Learning_CVPR_2017_paper.pdf.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884166
Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory. In K. Hale, & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.
Chuang, A. H. C. (2020). How to die (死: sǐ) properly in Mandarin Chinese. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, V. Monello, & M. Venuti (Eds.), Language, heart, and mind: Language at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp. 199–218). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b16874
Chuang, A. H. C. (2022). Refashioning Chinese búshì rhetoricals. International Review of Pragmatics, 14, 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402006
Chuang, A. H. C. (in press). What a “Zéi-licious” Meal! — A Cultural-Pragmatic Approach to Chinese Positive Irony. In Judit Baranyine Koczy, Diana Prodanovic Stankic & Olga Panić Kavgić (Eds.), Cultural Linguistics and the Social World. Springer.
Clapin, H., Staines, P., & Slezak, P. (Eds.). (2004). Representation in mind: New approaches to mental representation. Elsevier.
Clark, A. (1996). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. MIT Press.
Clark, E. V. (2003). Fist language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000903225939
Clark, H. H. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58(2), 332–373.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levin, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10096-006
Clark, H. H., & Gerrig, R. J. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 121–126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.121
Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite knowledge and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). Cambridge University Press.
Cole, P. (1981). (Ed.). Radical pragmatics. Academic Press.
Coletta, A. (2021). He mocked a disabled boy in a comedy bit. Canada’s Supreme Court found his words were “disgraceful” but not discriminatory. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/10/29/canada-supreme-court-joke-ward-gabriel/.
Colston, H. L. (1997). Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticisms. Discourse Processes, 23(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980
Colston, H. L. (2000). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition, 8, 277–324. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1075/pc.8.2.02col
Colston, H. L. (2007). On necessary conditions for verbal irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14(2), 277–324. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.8.2.02col
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W. (2002). Are irony and metaphor understood differently? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(1), 27–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1701_5
Colston, H. L., & Keller, S. B. (1998). You'll never believe this: Irony and hyperbole in expressing surprise. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(4), 499–513. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/A:1023229304509
Colston, H. L., & Lee, S. Y. (2004). Gender differences in verbal irony use. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 289–306. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327868ms1904_3
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole. Discourse Processes, 30(2), 179–199. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15326950DP3002_05
Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Corbett, E. P. J., & Connors, R. J. (1999). Classical rhetoric for the modern student (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1510–1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840579
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
Croft, W. (2006). Typology. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 337–368). Blackwell.
Croft, W. (2010). The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics, 48(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.001
Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Cruse, A. (2000). Aspects of the micro-structure of word meanings. In Y. Ravin, & C. Leacock(Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches (pp. 30–51). Oxford University Press.
Cruse, A. (2011). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cuddon, J. A. (2013). The Penguin dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (5th ed.). Penguin.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349– 367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
Cummins, R. (1991). Meaning and mental representation. MIT Press.
Curcó, C. (1995). Some observations on the pragmatics of humorous interpretations: A relevance-theoretic approach. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 7, 27–47.
Dahl, Ö. (2004). The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.71
Dancygier, B. (2012). Negation, stance verbs, and intersubjectivity. In B. Dancygier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 97–111). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727.006
Dancygier, B. (2012). The language of stories: A cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511794414
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge University Press.
Dare, S. A., & Sanni, M. A. (2019). A pragmatic study of verbal irony in selected Yoruba home videos. KIU Journal of Humanities, 4(4), 191–200.
Dasher, R. B. (1995). Grammaticalization in the system of Japanese predicate honorifics (Publication No. 9535574) [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Davidov, D., Tsur, O., & Rappoport, A. (2010). Semi-supervised recognition pf sarcastic sentences in Twitter and Amazon. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, 107–116.
Davis, E., & Marcus, G. (2015). Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701413
De Saussure, L. (2007). Procedural pragmatics and the study of discourse. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.10sau
De Smet, H., & J.-C. Verstraete. (2006). Coming to terms with subjectivity. Cognitive Linguistics, 17, 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.011
Desta, Y. (2022). How Will Smith and Chris Rock’s Oscar night became one for the history books. Vanity Fair. Retrieved from https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/03/how-will-smith-and-chris-rocks-oscar-night-became-one-for-the-history-books.
De Villiers, J. C., & Pyers, J. E. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding. Cognitive Development, 17(1), 1037–1060.
Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Long and Short Papers) (Vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186). Association for Computational Linguistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. (1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes, 19, 347–367. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01638539509544922
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995a). Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1001_2
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1995b). Obligatory processing of literal and nonliteral meanings in verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1579–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00005-3
Dews, S., & Winner, E. (1997). Attributing meaning to deliberately false utterances: The case of irony. Advances in Psychology, 122, 377–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80142-2
Diewald, G. (2011). Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics, 49(2), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2011.011
Diewald, G, Kresic, M., & Smirnova, E. (2009). The grammaticalization channels of evidentials and modal particles in German: Integration in textual structures as a common feature. In M.-B. Mosegaard Hansen, & J. Visconti (Eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics (pp. 189–209). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_011
Dik, S. C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar (2nd ed., Vol. 1). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110218367.fm
Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. Free Press.
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805­–855.
Du Bois, J. W. (2003). Discourse and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (Vol. 2, pp. 47–87). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Du Bois, J. W. (2014a). Motivating competitions. In B. MacWhinney, A. L. Malchukov, & E. Moravcsik (Eds.), Competing motivations in grammar and usage (pp. 263–281). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198709848.003.0016
Du Bois, J. W. (2014b). Representing discourse. Linguistics Department, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Du Bois, J. W. (2017). Ergativity in discourse and grammar. In J. Coon, D. Massam, & L. D. Travis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.2
Dynel, M. (2013). Irony from a neo-Gricean perspective: On untruthfulness and evaluative implicature. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10, 403–431. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0018
Dynel, M. (2016). Two layers of overt untruthfulness. When irony meets metaphor, hyperbole meiosis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 23(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.2.03dyn
Dynel, M. (2018). Irony, deception, and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501507922
Dworkin, S. (2010). Lexical change. In Maiden, J. Smith, & A. Ledgeway (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Romance Languages (585–605). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521800723.014
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1972). What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior? In P. Ekman (Ed.), Emotion in the human face: Guidelines for research and an integration of findings (pp. 67–65). Pergamon Press.
Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003
Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction. Routledge.
Evans, D. (Ed.). (2014). Language and identity: Discourse in the world. Bloomsbury.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315864327
Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3–4), 283–304. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1419544.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Fahnestock, J. (2012). Rhetorical style: The use of language in persuasion. Oxford University Press.
Feinberg, L. (1996). Transgender warriors: Making history from Joan of Arc to Dennis Rodman. Beacon Press.
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘Good Enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
Filik, R., Turcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2016). Sarcasm and emotions: Comprehension and emotional impact. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(11), 2130–2146. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F17470218.2015.1106566
Filippova, E., & Astington, J. W. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development, 79(1), 126–138. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01115.x
Filippova, E. A., & Astington, J. W. (2010). Children's understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony. Child Development, 81(3), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.x
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach, & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976a). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Origins and evolution of language and speech, 280(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x
Fillmore, C. J. (1976b). The need for frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 12, 5–29.
Fillmore, C. J. (1977). Scenes-and-frames semantics. In A. Zampolli (Ed.), Linguistics Structure Processing (pp. 55–81). North Holland.
Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111-137). Hanshin.
Fillmore, C. J. (1997). Lectures on deixis. CSLI publications.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of LET ALONE. Language, 64, 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
Fine, G. A. (1983). Shared fantasy: Role-playing games as social worlds. University of Chicago Press.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvard University Press.
Forman, M. (2002). The ’hood comes first: Race, space, and place in rap and hip-hop. Wesleyan University Press.
Forman, M., & Neal, M. A. (Eds.). (2012). That’s the joint!: The hip-hop studies reader. Routledge.
Fowler, H. W. (1965). A dictionary of modern English usage (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2005). The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax, 8(2), 121–174. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9612.2005.00077.x
Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1218
Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton University Press.
Fujii, S. (2000). Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. John Benjamins. Retrieved from https://www.degruyter.com/database/COGBIB/entry/cogbib.4115/html.
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers’ assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.62.3.378
Gallagher, S. (2001). The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or primary interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7), 83–108.
Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2008). Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C., Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 17–38). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.04gal
Garmendia, J. (2010). Irony is critical. Pragmatics and Cognition, 18(2), 397–421. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar
Garmendia, J. (2018). Irony. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316136218
Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.
Geeraerts, D., Grondelaers, S., Bakema, P. (1994). The structure of lexical variation—meaning, naming, and context. Cognitive Linguistics Research 5. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110873061
Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and relationships: Soundings in social construction. Harvard University Press.
Ghosh, A., Guo, W., & Muresan, S. (2015a). Sarcastic or not: Word embedding to predict the literal or sarcastic meaning of words. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1003–1012. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1116
Ghosh, A., Li, G., Veale, T., Rosso, P., Shutova, E., Barnden, J., and Reyes, A. (2015b). SemEval-2015 task 11: Sentiment analysis of figurative language in Twitter. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval2015), 470–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/S15-2080
Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862
Gibbs, R. W. (2002). A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(4), 457–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00046-7
Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844
Gibbs, R. W. (2014). Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In M. Landau, M. D. Robinson, & B. P. Meier (Eds.). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 17–40). American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/14278-002
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779
Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., & Francuzo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.009
Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brien, J. (1991). Psychological aspects of irony understanding. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(6), 523–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90101-3
Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(7), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01187-5
Giora, R. (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes, 19(2), 239–264. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01638539509544916
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.3.183
Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1998). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 13(1), 15–31. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1075/upal.35.11gio
Giora, R., Zaidel, E., Soroker, N., Batori, G., & Kasher, A. (2000). Differential effects of right-and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1–2), 63–83. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15327868MS151&2_5
Givón, T. (1979a). From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy (pp. 207–233). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-285451-4.50011-4
Givón, T. (1979b). On understanding grammar. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10728-3
Givón, T. (1980). From discourse to syntax: Grammar as a processing strategy. In T. Givón (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (Vol. 12, pp. 81–112). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_005
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.17
Givón, T. (1989). Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and grammar. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.74
Givón, T. (2001). Syntax: An introduction (Vol. 2). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.syn2
Givón, T. (2009). The genesis of syntactic complexity. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.146
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine De Gruyter.
Glenwright, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2010). Development of children's ability to distinguish sarcasm and verbal irony. Journal of Child Language, 37(2), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000909009520
Glucksberg, S. (1995). Commentary on nonliteral language: Processing and use. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10(1), 47–57. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327868ms1001_5
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Pantheon Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldacre, B. (2009). Bad science: Quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks. Fourth Estate.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphor and primary scenes [Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley]. eScholarship.
Gray, J., Jones, J. P., & Thompson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Satire TV: Politics and comedy in the post-network era. New York University Press.
Green, D. H. (1980). Irony in the medieval Romance. Cambridge University Press.
Greimas, A. J. (1984). Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1966)
Greimas, A. J., & Courtês, J. (1982). Actants, actors, and figures. University of Minnesota Press.
Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning, and word meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 225–242.
Grice, H. P. (1969). Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review, 78, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184179
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 183–198). Academic Press.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Logic and conversation. In H. P. Grice (Ed.), Studies in the way of words (pp. 1–143). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1967)
Gries, S. T., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65, 228–255. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/lang.12119
Grundy, P. (2014). Optimality in neo-Gricean pragmatics: The challenge for E2L users [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNT4uorPEVM&t=1130s
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O
Gumperz, J. J. (1971). Language in social groups: Essays by John Gumperz; selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611834
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge University Press.
Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. Hale, & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). MIT Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English (English language series 9). Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hanks, W. F. (1990). Referential practice: Language and lived space among the Maya. University of Chicago Press.
Hanks, W. F. (2011). Deixis and indexicality. In W. Bublitz, & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (pp. 315–346). De Gruyter Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260.315
Harris, A. (2022). Will Smth apologizes to Chris Rock after Oscar slap. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/28/movies/will-smith-chris-rock-oscars.html.
Harris, D. (1998). From Abba to Zoom: A pop culture encyclopedia of the late 20th century. Andrews McMeel.
Haspelmath, M. (2004). On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Peridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization (pp. 17–44). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.59.03has
Haspelmath, M. (2016). Understanding morphology. Routledge.
Haverkate, H. (1990). A speech act analysis of irony. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90065-L
Hay, J. (2000). Functions of humor in the conversations of men and women. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(6), 709–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00069-7
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell.
Heine, B. (1992). Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language, 16(2), 335–368. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16.2.05hei
Heine, B. (2003). Grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 575–601). Blackwell.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.
Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J. L. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278107.001.0001
Hennen, P. (2005). Faeries, bears, and leathermen: Men in community Queering the Masculine. University of Chicago Press.
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional changes in English: Developments in Allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206
Himmelmann, N. P. (2004). Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In W. Bisang, N. P. Himmelmann, & B. Wiemer (Eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its components and its fringes (pp. 21–41). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197440.1.21
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essence: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. Basic Books.
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. MIT Press.
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1, pp. 17–36). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hop
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd Ed). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525
Horn, L. R. (2009). Implying and inferring. In K. Allen, & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 69–86). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.005
Huang, S. (2013). Chinese grammar at work. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.1
Hurley, M. M., Dennett, D. C., & Adams, Jr., R. B. (2011). Inside jokes: Using humor to reverse-engineer the mind. MIT Press.
Husserl, E. G. A. (1952). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second Book (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer. (Original work published 1913 as Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution)
Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony's edge: The theory and politics of irony. Routledge.
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz, & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ide, D. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8, 223–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.223
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. MIT Press.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. Henry Holt & Company.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
Jorgensen, J. (1996). The functions of sarcastic irony in speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 613–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4
Josephson, J. R., & Josephson, S. G. (Eds.). (1996). Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press.
Joshi, A. K., Levy, L. S., & Takahashi, M. (1975). Tree adjunct grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 10(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0000(75)80019-5
Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Blackwell.
Kalandadze, T., Norbury, C., Nærland, T., & Næss, K.-A. B. (2018). Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism, 22(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316668652
Kasher, A. (Ed.). (1998). Pragmatics: Critical concepts (Vol. 1–6). Routledge.
Katz, A. N., Blasko, D. G., & Kazmerski, V. A. (2004). Saying what you don’t mean: Social influence on sarcastic language processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(5), 186–189. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00304.x
Katz, A. N., & Lee, C. J. (1993). The role of authorial intent in determining verbal irony and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8, 257–279. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327868ms0804_1
Kay, P. (1997). Words and the grammar of context. CSLI.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y construction. Language, 75, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.2307/417472
Kecskes, I. (2008). Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
Keller, R. (1994). On language change: The invisible hand in language (B. Nerlich, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1990)
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge University Press.
Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(2), 46–50. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175613
Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00064-7
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Kissine, M. (2012). Pragmatics, cognitive flexibility and autism spectrum disorders. Mind & Language, 27(1), 1–28. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2011.01433.x
Kitaev, N., Kaiser, L., & Levskaya, A. (2020). Reformer: The efficient transformer. In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, & R. Garnett (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR2020). Retrieved from https://openreview.net/attachment?id=rkg NKkHtvB&name=original_pdf.
Kitamura, N. (2000). Adapting Brown and Levinson’s ‘politeness’ theory to the analysis of casual conversation. Proceedings of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.als.asn.au/proceedings/als2000/kitamura.pdf
Klein, D. E., & Murphy, G. L. (2001). The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 259–282. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1006/jmla.2001.2779
Klepousniotou, E. (2002). The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language, 81(1–3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2518
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000–1009. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/BF03195762
Knox, N. (1961). The word irony and its context, 1500–1755. Duke University Press.
Knox, D. (1989). Ironia: Medial and Renaissance ideas on irony. Brill.
Konvička, M. (2019). Grammaticalisation clines: A brief conceptual history. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences. Retrieved from https://hiphilangsci.net/2019/03/06/grammaticalisation-clines/
Köder, F., & Falkum, I. L. (2021). Irony and perspective-taking in children: The roles of norm violations and tone of voice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 624604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624604
Kövecses, Z. (2003). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and Body in human feeling. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1
Kreuz, R. J., & Glucksberg, S. (1989). How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(4), 374–386. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.118.4.374
Krims, A. (2000). Rap music and the poetics of identify. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-2075
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Kumon-Nakamura, S., Glucksberg, S., & Brown, M. (1995). How about another piece of pie: The allusional pretense theory of discourse irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(1), 3–21. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(2), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
Kuryłowicz, J. (1965). The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes, 13(51), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219216501305105
Kuteva, T., Heine, B., & Narrog, H. (2019). Word lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316479704
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980a). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980b). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453–486. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025464
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511620607
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
Langacker, R. W. (1991a). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Descriptive application (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991b). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/infodaf-1993-202-359
Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
Langacker, R. W. (1995). Raising and transparency. Language, 71, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/415962
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Losing control: Grammaticalization, subjectification, and transparency. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 147–75). De Gruyter Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110804195.147
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Langacker, R. W. (2010). Grammar and conceptualization. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524
Langacker, R. W. (2011). Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity (pp. 17–40). De Gruyter Mouton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110892970.17
Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Ward, P. B. (2006). Empathetic perspective-taking is impaired in schizophrenia: Evidence from a study of emotion attribution and theory of mind. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800444000218
LaPolla, R. J. (1990). Grammatical relations in Chinese: Synchronic and diachronic considerations [Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley]. eScholarship. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8330f4pk.
LaPolla, R. J. (1995). Pragmatic relations and word order in Chinese. In P. Downing & M. Noonan (Eds.), Word order in discourse (pp. 297–329). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.30.11lap
Leech, G. N. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. Longman.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of politeness. Longman.
Leech, G. (2007). Politeness: Is there an East-West divide? Journal of Politeness Research, 3(2), 167–206.
Lehmann, C. (1985). Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile, 20, 303–318.
Lehmann, C. (2004). Theory and method in grammaticalization. In g. Diewald (Ed.), Grammatikalisierung. Special Issue of Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 32, 152–187.
Lehmann, C. (2015). Thoughts on grammaticalization (3rd ed.). Language Science Press. (Original work published 1982) https://doi.org/10.17169/langsci.b88.99
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Contextualizing “contextualization cues.” In S. L. Eerdmans, C. L. Prevignono, and P. L. Thibault (Eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz (pp. 31–39). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.117.04lev
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2007). Polysemy, prototypes, and radical categories. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 139–169). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0006
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis, D. (1975). Languages and language. In K. Gunderson (Ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 7, pp. 3–35). University of Minnesota Press.
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00258436
Li, A.-R., & Huang, C.-R. (2019). A method of modern Chinese irony detection. In Q. Su, & W. Zhan (Eds.), From minimal contrast to meaning construct (pp. 273–288). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9240-6_19
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1979). Third-person and zero-anaphora in Chinese discourse. In Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Discourse and syntax (Vol. 12, pp. 311–335). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_014
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press.
Littlemore, J. (2003). The effects of cultural backgrounds on metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_4
Liu, M.-C., & Hu, C.-Y. (2013). Free alternation? A study on grammatical packaging of excessive predication in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 14(1), 47–90.
Liu, M.-C., C.-Y. Hu, & S.-C. Huang. (2008). A study on xianmu si wo le (羨慕死我了) construction. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL-16), May 30-June 2, 2008. Peking University.
Liu, Y. (2014). A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Degree Adverbs “Zéi” and “Chāo” (程度副词“贼”和“超”社会语言学调查分析). Journal of Suihua University, 34(9), 68–72.
Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74(4), 1130–1144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00597
Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., & Ryder, N. (2007). Development of pragmatic language comprehension in Finnish-speaking children. First Language, 27(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723707076568
Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157–176). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.11lou
Lucariello, J. M., & Nelson, K. (1985). Slot-filler categories as memory organisers for young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39(1), 28–59.
Mao, R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6
Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2004). “There’s millions of them”: Hyperbole in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 149–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00116-4
McGraw, P., & Warner, J. (2014). The humor code: A global search for what makes things funny. Simon & Schuster.
MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll, & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49–67). Oxford University Press.
Malle, B. F., & Hodges, S. D. (2005). Other minds: How humans bridge the divine between self and others. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3084
Mandel, D. R., Hilton, D., J., & Catellani, P. (2005). The psychology of counterfactual thinking. Routledge.
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1
Matlock, T. (2011). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In J. E. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 221–234). Cambridge Scholars.
Matsumoto, Y. (1989). Politeness and conversational universals: Observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8, 207–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.207
McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0038
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
Meibauer, J. (2014). Lying at the semantics-pragmatics interface. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510840
Meillet, A. (1958). L’évolution des forms grammaticales. In A. Meillet (Ed.), Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Champion. (Work originally published 1912)
Menninghaus, W., Bohrn, I. C., Knoop, C. A., Kotz, S. A., Schlotz, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition, 143, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.026
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1954). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Michaelis, L., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based theory of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72, 215–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/416650
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Saldaña, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Miller, D. N. (2011). Positive Affect. In S. Goldstein, & J. A. Naglieri (Eds), Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development (pp. 1121–1122). Springer.
Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press.
Morzycki, M. (2015). Modification. Cambridge University Press.
Muecke, D.C. (1970). Irony and the Ironic. Methuen.
Muecke, D. C. (2020). The Compass of Irony. Methuen. (Original work published, 1969)
Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. MIT Press.
Myers Roy, A. (1977). Towards a definition of irony. In Ralph W. Fasold, & R. Shuy (Eds.), Studies in language variation (pp. 171–183). Georgetown University Press.
Myers Roy, A. (1981). The function of irony in discourse. Text, 1(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1981.1.4.407
Neeleman, A., Van De Koot, H., & Doetjes, J. (2004). Degree expressions. The Linguistic Review, 21(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2004.001
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Cognitive and chance: Thy psychology of probabilistic reasoning. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610836
Noh, E-J. (1998). Echo questions: Metarepresentation and pragmatic enrichment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, 603–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1005361528891
Noh, E-J. (2000). Metarepresentation: A Relevance-Theory approach. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.69
Norde, M. (2002). The final stages of grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 45–65). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.06nor
Norde, M. (2009). Degrammaticalization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207923.001.0001
Norrick, N. R. (2001). Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Toward a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 1, 29–50. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/02699938708408362
Oakley, T., & Pascual, E. (2017). Conceptual blending theory. In Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 423–448). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316339732.027
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1984). Language acquisition and socialization: Three developmental stories and their implications. In R. A. Shweder, & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 276–320). Cambridge University Press.
Oring, E. (1994). Humor and the suppression of sentiment. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 7, 7–26. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1515/humr.1994.7.1.7
Östman, J.-O., & Fried, M. (Eds.). (2005). Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3
Pagliuca, W. (1994). Perspectives on grammaticalization. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.001.0001
Papafragou, A. (1998). The acquisition of modality: Implications for theories of semantic representation. Mind & Language, 13, 370–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00082
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicature: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition, 86(3), 253–282. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8
Paradis, C. (2001). Adjectives and boundaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.1.47
Park, J. H., Shin, J., & Fung, P. (2018). Reducing gender bias, in abusive language detection. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2799–2804. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1302
Partington, A. (2004). “Utterly content in each other’s company”: Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1075/IJCL.9.1.07PAR
Partington, A. (2006). The linguistics of laughter: A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203966570
Partington, A. (2007). Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(9), 1547–1569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2006). Critical thinking: Learn the best tools the best thinkers use. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Payne, T. E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge University Press.
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. J. Buchler (Ed.). Dover Publications.
Pelletier, F. J. (1994). The Principle of Semantic Compositionality. Topoi, 13, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00763644
Pelletier, F. J. (2001). Did Frege believe Frege’s principle? Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10, 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026594023292
Perlmutter, D. M. (Ed.). (1983). Studies in Relational Grammar 1. University of Chicago Press.
Pexman, P. M. (2008). It’s fascinating research: Th cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x
Pexman, P. M., Ferretti, T. R., & Katz, A. N. (2007). Discourse factors that influence online reading of metaphor and irony. In R. W. Gibbs, & H. J. Colston (Eds.), Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader (pp. 231–251). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pexman, P. M., & Olineck, K. M. (2002). Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes, 33(3), 199–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303_1
Piaget, J. (1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000056
Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik, & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Theories of emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 3–33). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7
Poggi, I., & D’Errico, F. (2010). Social signals: A framework in terms of goals and beliefs. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0512-6
Popa-Wyatt, M. (2020). Hyperbolic figures. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, & Herbert L. Colston (Eds.), The diversity of irony (pp. 91–106). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110652246-005
Popper, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Portner, P., & Partee, B. H. (Eds.). (2002). Formal semantics: The essential readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Potts, C. (2014). (2nd ed). Pragmatics. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 157–178). Oxford University Press.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavior and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0140525X00076512
Provine, R. R. (2001). Laughter: A scientific investigation. Penguin.
Quinn, E. (2006). A dictionary of literary and thematic terms (2nd ed.). Facts on File.
Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog, 1(8), 9. http://openai.com/blog/better-language-models/
Ramat, P. (1992). Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 30, 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.3.549
Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel.
Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of being: Phenomenology, psychiatry, and the sense of reality. Oxford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1093/med/9780199206469.001.0001
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge University Press.
Reddy, M. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge University Press.
Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Harvard University Press.
Reyes, A., Rosso, P., & Veale, T. (2013). A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-012-9196-x
Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford University Press.
Richards, I. A. (1961). Principles of literary criticism. Routledge.
Ricks, C. (1964). The force of poetry. Oxford University Press.
Ritzer, G, & Stepnisky, J. (2018). Sociological Theory (10th ed.). Sage.
Roese, N. J. (1994). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 133–148. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60015-5
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, & B. B Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 28–49). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rosch, E., & Mervis C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
Rose, T. (1994). Black noise: Rap music and black culture in contemporary America. University Press of New England.
Rossman, V. (1975). Perspectives of irony in medieval French literature. De Gruyter Mouton.
Roth, W.-M. (2013). On meaning and mental representation: A pragmatic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-251-8
Ruiz-Gurillo, L., & Alvarado Ortega, M. B. (Eds.). (2013). Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.231
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xiv.4.479
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–2). Blackwell.
Samanani, F., Crockford, S., Knight, D. M., Stensrud, C., Daswani, G., Tuters, M., & Chaviara, I. (2023). Animating irony: The force of irony in online and offline political movements. Public Cultures, 35(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-10575859
Sanka, C. G., Issaka, C. A., & Kofigah, F. E. (2022). Keeping the community together in one unit: A study of irony as communicative tool in selected Sisaala personal names. Journal of Language and Communication, 9(1), 41–59.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1916)
Saxe, R., & Kanwisher, N. (2003). People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” NeuroImage, 19(4), 1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00230-1
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 101–114. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2786745
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/CBO9780511791208
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, Harvey. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/LAN.1977.0041
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Harvard University Press.
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. E. (Eds.). (2005). The handbook of discourse analysis. Blackwell.
Schilbach, L. (2010). A second-person approach to other minds. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(6), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2805-c1
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. W., & Jones, R. H. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach (3nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
Seedhouse, P., & Young, R. F. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
Seto, K. (1998). On non-echoic irony. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance Theory: Application and implications (pp. 239–255). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.37.13set
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inferences. Houghton Mifflin.
Sharifian, F. (2016). Cultural pragmatic schemas, pragmemes, and practs: A cultural linguistics perspective. In K. Allen, A. Capone, & I. Kecskes (Eds.), Pragmemes and theories of language use (pp. 505–519). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_26
Sharp, C. J. (2009). Irony and meaning in the Hebrew Bible. Indiana University Press.
Sheng, L. (2015). A comparison between zéi in Northeastern dialect and hěn in Standard Chinese (东北方言“贼”与普通话“很”之比较). Northern Literature, 17.
Shi, D. (1989). Topic chain as a syntactic category in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 17(2), 223–262.
Shibata, M., Abe, J., Terao, A., & Miyamoto, T. (2007). Neural mechanisms involved in the comprehension of metaphoric and literal sentences: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1166, 92–102. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040
Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498350
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. H. Basso, & H. A. Selby (Eds.), Meaning in anthropology (pp. 11–55). University of New Mexico Press.
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621031.004
Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology, and point of view. Routledge.
Sinclair, J. (Ed.). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge University Press.
Smortchkova, J., Dołęga, K., Schlicht, T. (Eds.). (2020). What are mental representations? Oxford University Press.
Sorensen, R. (2007). Bald-faced lies! Lying without the intent to deceive. Pacific Philosophy Quarterly, 88, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0114.2007.00290.X
Sperber, D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind & Language, 12, 67–83. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1468-0017.00036
Sperber, D., & Noveck, I. A. (Eds.). (2004). Experimental pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057%2F9780230524125
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 295–318). Academic Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986a). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986b). Loose talk. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86(1), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/86.1.153
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language, 17(1–2), 3–23. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/1468-0017.00186
Spotorno, N., Koun, E., Prado, J., Van Der Henst, J. B., & Noveck, I. A. (2012). Neural evidence that utterance-processing entails mentalizing: The case of irony. Neuroimage, 63(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.046
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 315–332). Academic Press.
Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5–6), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020867916902
Steels, L. (Ed.). (2011). Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.11
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge University Press.
Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Su, L. I.-W. (2002). What can metaphors tell us about culture? Language and Linguistics, 3(3), 589–613.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Harvard University Press.
Sweetser, E. E. (1988). Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 389–405). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1774
Sweetser, E. (2012). Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground up. In B. Dancygier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective (pp. 1–22). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084727
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vols. 1–2). MIT Press.
Tannen, D. (1984). Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Ablex.
Tao, L. (2011). A study of the grammaticalization of the degree adverb “zéi” (程度副词“贼”的语法化分析). Journal of Kaili University, 29(4).
Tao, L. (2020). Usage, media, and grammaticalization: The rhetorical question “bu35shi51...ma” in Mandarin Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse, 11, 55–83.
Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Clarendon Press.
Taylor, J. R. (1990). Schemas, prototypes, and models: In search of the unity of sign. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp. 521–534). Routledge.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. R. (2003). Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences, 25(6), 637–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(03)00031-7
Taylor, J. R. (2006). Polysemy and the lexicon. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibánez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 51–80). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761.1.51
Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2001). Generalization, similarity and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4), 629–640. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1017/S0140525X01000061
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction. Longman.
Thompson, S. A., & Mulac, A. (1991). A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Focus on types of grammatical markers (Vol. 2, pp. 313–329). John Benjamins.
Timberlake, A. (1977). Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change (pp. 141–177). University of Texas Press.
Tissari, H. (2012). Integrating naming, claiming and story-telling: Towards a broader cognitive linguistic understanding of emotion. In Paul A. Wilson (Ed.), Dynamicity in emotion concepts (pp. 95–122). Peter Lang.
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2009). The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In E. Bavin (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of child language (pp. 69–87). Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M., & Carpenter, M. (2007). Shared intentionality. Developmental Science, 10(1), 121–125.
Tomkins, S. S. (1984). Affect theory. In K. R. Scherer, & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 163–196). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Toop, D. (1991a). Rap attack 3: African rap to global hip hop. Sepent’s Tail.
Toop, D. (1991b). The rap attack: African jive to New York hip hop. Pluto Press.
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann, & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (pp. 245–271). John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 406–416). https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1784
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57, 33–65.
Traugott, E. C. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In D. Stein, & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectification: Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 31–54). Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (1997). Subjectification and the development of epistemic meanings: The case of promise and threaten. In T. Swan, & O. J. Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages (pp. 185–210). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C. (1999a). The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: A study in subjectification. In A. Blank, & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 177–196). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C. (1999b). The role of pragmatics in a theory of semantic change. In J. Verschueren (Ed.), Pragmatics in 1998: Selected papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 93–102). International Pragmatics Association.
Traugott, E. C. (2002). From etymology to historical pragmatics. In D. Minkova, & R. Stockwell (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective (19–49). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C. (2003a). Constructions in grammaticalization. In B. D. Joseph, & R. D. Janda (Eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 624–647). Blackwell.
Traugott, E. C. (2003b). From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp. 124–140). Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2008). Grammaticalization, constructions and the incremental development of language: Suggestions from the development of Degree Modifiers in English. In R. Eckardt, G. Jäger, & T. Veenstra (Eds.), Variation, Selection, Development: Probing the evolutionary model of language change (pp. 219–252). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C. (2010). (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–74). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C. (2012a). Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In B. Heine, & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2012b). Pragmatics and language change. In A. Allen. & K. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 549–566). Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2013). Grammaticalization. In S. Luraghi, & V. Bubenik (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics (pp. 271-285). Bloomsbury.
Traugott, E. C. (2014). Semantic change. In L. Cheng, & R. Sybesma (Eds.), The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book: The latest in linguistics (pp. 385–406). De Gruyter Mouton. (Original work published 2000)
Traugott, E. C. (2015). Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization. In J. Barðdal, E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer, & S. Gildea (Eds.), Diachronic construction grammar (pp. 51–80). John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. (2018). Rethinking the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of interactional texts. Open Linguistics, 4(1), 19–34.
Traugott, (2022). Ten lectures on a diachronic constructionist approach to discourse structuring markers. Brill.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2004). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 2001)
Traugott, E. C., & König, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1, pp. 189–218). John Benjamins. (Original work published 1988)
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2010). Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. In E. C. Traugott, & G. Trousdale (Eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization (pp. 19–44). John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Trapp, M. (Ed.). (2017). Socrates from antiquity to the Enlightenment. Routledge.
Traverso, V. (2009). The dilemmas of third-party complaints in conversation between friends. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2385–2399.
Traverso, V., & Colleoni, E. (2016). Irony in everyday life conversations among Italians. International Review of Pragmatics, 8(1), 49–74.
Trevarthen, C. (1998). The concept and foundations of infant intersubjectivity. In S. Bråten (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 15–46). Cambridge University Press.
Tsur, R. (2015). Irony and the ironic. John Benjamins.
Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517
Utsumi, A. (2000). Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(12), 1777–1806.
Van Deemter, K. (2010). Not exactly: In praise of vagueness. Oxford University Press.
Van der Auwera, J., & Plugian, V. A. (Eds.). (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2(1), 1–126.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Hout, A., & Janssen, T. (2018). How to do things with words: The use of mental state verbs in language production in theory of mind tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 915.
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (Ed.). (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge University Press.
Van Valin, R. D. Jr., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax, structure, meaning and function. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2018). Attention is all you need. In I. Guyon, U. von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. M. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Jegelka, D. M. Blei, & K. Muandet (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurLPS) (pp. 6000–6010). Curran Associates.
Verhagen, A. (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford University Press.
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Edward Arnold.
Verschueren, J. (2004). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. In A. Jaworski, N. Coupland, & D. Galasinski (Eds.), Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives (pp. 53–74). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907377.53
Vlastos, G. (1991). Socrates: Ironist and moral philosopher. Cornell University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, H., & Li, Z. (2005). Grammatical features of adverbial zéi and beyond. (副词“贼”之语法特征及其他). Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences (Social Sciences Edition), 5, 745–748.
Warren, L. (2103). Towards redefining Socratic irony. Akroterion, 58(1), 1–17.
Webb, E. J. (2018). The rhetoric of authenticity: Celebrity, citizenship, and the late-night talk show. Oxford University Press.
Weinreich, U. (1963). On the semantic structure of language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language. Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13–15, 1961. MIT Press.
Wellman, H. M., Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523–541.
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of human Interaction (2nd ed.). De Gruyter Mouton.
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge University Press.
Whitsitt, S. (2005). A critique of the concept of semantic prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(3), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1075/IJCL.10.3.01WHI
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2016). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (12th ed.). Pearson.
Wilson, D. (2000). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (Ed.), 2000 Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective, (pp. 411–448). Oxford University Press.
Wilson, D. (2006). The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretense? Lingua, 116(10), 1722–1743.
Wilson, D. (2012). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 230–258). Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, D. (2017). Irony, hyperbole, jokes and banter. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language: Applications in interdisciplinary contexts (pp. 201–220). Springer.
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230–259). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1–2), 1–25.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1998). Pragmatics and time. In R. Carston, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 1–22). John Benjamins.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Blackwell.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press.
Winner, E., & Leekam, S. (1991). Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 257–270.
Winner, E., Brownell, H., Happé, F., Blum, A., & Pincus, D. (1998). Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 62(1), 89–106.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Macmillan.
Woodward, J. F. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.
Woofter, K. M. (2017). “Reading is fundamental”: The role of reading in drag queen performance. Performance Research, 22(2), 53–60.
Yahr, E. (2022). Will Smith and Chris Rock’s onstage altercation at the Oscars: Everything you need to know. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/03/28/will-smith-chris-rock-oscars/
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Yus, F. (2016). Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics and Cognition, 23(1), 92–116.
Zahavi, D. (2001). Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7), 151–167. http://10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646814.003.0016
Zeng, S. M. (1996). A pragmatic study of Chinese interrogatives (Publication No. 9713998). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Zhang, R. (2016). A preliminary study of the degree adverb “zéi” in Northeaster Mandarin dialect. (试析东北方言程度副词“贼”). Journal of Chifeng University (Philosophy and Social Science Chinese Edition), 37(4).
Zhang, Y., Sun, S., & Wong, K. F. (2020). Conversational AI: Dialogue systems, generative models, and beyond. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 21(6), 763–779.
Ziegeler, D. (2003). Redefining unidirectionality: Insights from demodalisation. Folia Linguistica Historica, 24, 225–266.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE