:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:技術型高中學生與教師自主學習歷程之敘事研究
作者:賴沛綸
作者(外文):Lai, Pei-Lun
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育學系
指導教授:胡茹萍
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2024
主題關鍵詞:自主學習技術型高中Self-directed learningvocational high school
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
自主學習的兩個關鍵要素是準備好、能夠並願意為自己的學習負責的學習者。其次,學習者是積極參與者,而非被動接受者。本研究主要目的透過理解學生進行述說的語彙與表述方式,可以揭露學生本身的學習歷程以及在自主學習中的思維過程。主要研究目的有二,包括深入探討一位就讀私立技術型高中的學生在兩學年度內完整參與自主學習與一位指導教師的教學引導歷程,以及暸解技高學生在自主學習中的學習經驗與困難,從個人層面提出相對應的啟示和建議;並省思教師在學生自主學習中的角色與功能,探討教師如何更有效地引導和支持學生的自主學習,以促進更有意義的學習體驗,本研究選擇質性研究的敘事研究法對技高學生與指導老師分別進行訪談。並針對學生自主學習的部分,形塑了協助學生自主學習更好的實作方式:一、調整自主學習計畫申請書的撰寫方式、二、 引導善用網路教材資源、三、因應學生在學習歷程中的學習需求給予鷹架支持。對於教師在引導自主學習時也提出了所需扮演的角色和功能等,老師的功能在自主學習中主要是引導,幫助學生在沒有具體指令的情況下找到方向,確定學習目標,並選擇適合的學習資源和工具。透過自主學習,學生有機會涉足多個學科領域,這有助於培養跨學科的思考和解決問題的能力。培養自主學習能力對學生未來的發展有著深遠的影響。把技高原有的專業能力學習再加上新課綱的素養能力引導,這才真正地對技高學生未來有幫助,帶著他們去學習將來生活要面對問題的態度,以適應快速變化的工作環境,才能真正展現技高學生的核心價值。
The main purpose of this study was to explore the learning experiences and think processes of a student engaged in self-directed learning over two academic years in a private vocational high school, along with the guidance provided by a teacher. The research aimed to reveal the student's learning journey and difficulties in self-directed learning, offering insights and suggestions at the individual level. Additionally, it seeked to reflect on the role and functions of teachers in facilitating effective guidance and supported for students' self-directed learning, promoting meaningful learning experiences.
The qualitative narrative research method was chosen for interviews with both the vocational high school student and the guiding teacher. In terms of supporting students in self-directed learning, practical strategies were shaped, including adjusting the writing format of self-directed learning plans, guiding the effective use of online learning resources, and providing scaffold support based on students' learning needs.
For teachers guiding self-directed learning, their role primarily involved directing and helping students find direction, determined learning goals, and chose suitable learning resources and tools without specific instructions. Through self-directed learning, students had the opportunity to engage with multiple disciplines, fostering interdisciplinary thinking and problem-solving skills.
The cultivation of self-directed learning abilities had a profound impact on students' future development. Integrating existing technical competencies with the new curriculum's essential skills guidance truly benefits vocational high school students, preparing them to face challenges with the right attitude and adapt to rapidly changing work environments, showcasing their core values.
壹、 中文部分
丁凡(譯)(2018)。T. D. Walker著。像芬蘭這樣教(Teach like Finland)。臺北市:遠流。
王文科、王智弘(編譯)(2002)。質的教育研究-概念分析。臺北市:師苑。
王麗雲(2000)。自傳/傳記/生命史研究在教育的應用。載於質的研究法。高雄:麗文。
丘愛鈴 (2024)。以「思覺行盼」理念啟動自主學習力: 國中學習輔導教學設計案例特色與未來展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,13(1),124-131。
田振榮(2003)。我國技職教育體系能力標準建構之可行性研究。臺北市:教育部。
江吟梓、蘇文賢(譯)(2010)。M.Lichtman著。教育質性研究:實用指南(Qualitative Research in Education:A user’s Guide)。臺北市:學富。
李坤崇(2001)。綜合活動學習領域教材教法。台北:心理。
李蕙蘭(2005)。臺灣地區技職教育相關研究所學位論文內容分析之研究。未出版論文。臺北科技大學,台北市。
宋修德、李懿芳、林清南 (2021)。技術型高級中等學校自主學習的理念與 實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(2),133-141。
宋文里譯(2001)。教育的文化(J. Bruner 原著,1996 年出版)。臺北:遠流。
何縕琪(2008)。《敘事探究:質的研究中的經驗和故事》導讀與評論。課程研究,3(2),117-122。
吳璧純(2018)。學生自主學習,老師「做什麼」?國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,9(15),1-7。
林吟霞(2009)。德國適性教育實務篇: 中小學自主學習取向教學法之運用。教師天地,159,16-23。
林純如、丘愛鈴(2019)。符合適性教育理念之自主學習案例對十二年國教的啟示。台灣教育,719,67-76。
林騰蛟(2003)。技職教育的現況、問題與發展策略。技職及職業教育雙月刊,73,2-9。
范信賢(2003)。課程改革中的教師轉變:敘事探究的取向 (未出版博士論文)。國立台北師範學院,台北市。
范信賢(2005)。敘說課程實踐的故事:一種敘事性觀看教師經驗的方式。教育研究月刊,130,45-55。
范信賢(2013)。敘事探究的社會學想像:個體經驗與社會脈絡的交織。課程與教學季刊,16(1),139-158。
洪詠善(2017年11月)。自主學習的探究與實踐,國教課綱向前行電子報。取自www.newsletter.edu.tw
洪詠善、林佳慧、楊惠娥(2018)。十二年國教課綱自主學習之實踐探究。教育脈動,15,20-28。
洪詠善、盧秋珍(2017)。國中理解與實踐自主學習之案例研究。教育研究月刊,278,30-45。
姚美華、胡幼慧(2009)。一些質性方法上的思考: 信度與效度? 如何抽樣? 如何收集資料、登錄與分析?。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究、理論、方法及本土女性研究實例(第二版),117-132。台北市: 巨流。
紐文英(2015)。研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉。
高明瑞、蔡敦浩、林慧音(2012)。社會創業者的育成與實踐: 敘說探究之觀點。創業管理研究,7(1),55-81。
高寶玉、徐慧璇(2018)。自主學習課堂實踐之張力: 香港個案研究。課程與教學季刊,21(2),33-58。doi:10.6384/CIQ.201804_21(2).0002
梁雲霞(2006)。自主學習理論到學校實務-概念架構與方案發展。當代教育研究,14(4),171-206。
梁雲霞(2017)。自主學習:教師觀點的探究分析。教育論叢,5,169-190。
梁雲霞(2020)。善教樂學: 新課綱脈絡下的自主學習。教育研究月刊,309,4-22。
董家君(2021)。自主學習理論應用於大學英語課程設計之研究-以中部某大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中教育大學,台中市。
簡菲莉(2019)。十二年國教課綱高中自主學習建制化之實踐研究 (未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,台北市。
簡菲莉,陳佩英(2020)。探究高中自主學習課程話之學習者視角。教育研究月刊,309,24-39。
教育部(2013)。高級中等教育法。臺北市:教育部
教育部(2021)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市:教育部
教育部統計處(2019)。107學年高級中等學校教育消費支出調查概況。臺北市:教育部。
張仁家、陳琨義(2017)。從技術及職業教育法看我國技術型高中的發展與因應。技術及職業教育學報,7(2),61-75。
張添洲(2018)。技術型高中(高職)彈性學習時間的規劃與實施。商業職業教育季刊,142,2-16。
陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市: 五南。
陳棟樑、黃明一、周瓊瑤(2017)。臺中市教師專業學習社群與教師專業發展之研究。管理資訊計算,6(1),34-43。
潘世尊(2002)。教學上的鷹架如何搭。屏東師院學報,16,263-294。
潘淑滿(2003):質性研究理論與應用。台北:心理。
龐維國(2001)。論學生的自主學習。華東師範大學學報,20(2),78-83。

貳、英文部分
Abele, A. E., Wiese, B. S. (2008). The nomological network of self-management strategies and career success. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4): 733-749. doi: 10.1348/096317907X256726
Areglado, R. J.,Bradley R. C., & Lane, P. S. (1996). Learning for life:Creating classrooms for self-directed learning. Corwin Press, Inc.
Brandt, W. C. (2020). Measuring student success skills: A review of the literature on self-direction. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
Bruijn, E. & Leeman, Y.A.M.. (2011). Authentic and self-directed learning in vocational education: Challenges to vocational educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 694-702.
Caine, V. , Estefan, A., & Clandinin, D. J. (2013). A return to methodological commitment: Reflections on narrative inquiry. Scandinavia Journal of Educational Research, 57(6), 574–586.
Catterall, S. (2000). Promoting learner autonomy through the curriculum: Principle for designing language course. ELT journal, 52(2), 109-117.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methodsin education (4th ed.). London: Routledge
Costa,A.L. amd Kallick, B. (2003) Assessment stratigies for self-directed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and education. NAMTA Journal, 22(2), 2-35.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum
Ejaz S. et al. (2018). Readiness for self-directed learning nursing students in Lahore, Pakistan. International Journal of Graduate Research and Review, 4(2), 44-53
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21, 516-525. Doi:10.1054/nedt.2001.0589.
Francis, H. (2017). The Role of Technology in Self-Directed Learning: A Literature Review. Surrey, England: ACS Center for Inspiring Minds. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/35278698/The_role_of_technology_in_self-directed_learning_A_literature_review
Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An Analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148. doi: 10.1177/074171369204200302
Garrison, D. R. (1997) Self-directed learning: toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 18-33.
Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., Boshuizen, H., & van de Wiel, M. (2010). The challenge of self-directed and self-regulated learning in vocational education: A theoretical analysis and synthesis of requirements. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 62(4), 415-440
Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merrienboer, J. & Slot, W. (2009). Design and evaluation of a development portfolio: How to improve students' self-directed learning skills. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 37(5), 453-473.
Kincannon, S. D. (2010). A study of professional learning communities and science achievement in large high schools (Doctoral dissertation). Baylor University, Waco, Texas.
Knowles, M. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy New York: New York Association Press.
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago: Association Press/Follett.
Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education (Revised and Updated). New York: Cambridge.
Knowles, M. (1986). Using learning contracts: Practical approaches to individualizing and structuring learning. London: Jossey-Bass Publications.
Kranzow, J & Hyland ,N. (2016) Self-directed learning: Developing readiness in graduate students. International journal of self-directed learning, 13(2), 1-14.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: reading, analysis, and interpretation. Tousand Oaks: Sage.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: definition, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Lunyk-Child, O.I., Crooks, D., Ellis, P.J., Ofosu, C., O’Mara, L., & Rideout, E. (2001). Self-directed learning: faculty and student perceptions. Journal of Nurse Education, 40(3), 116-123.
Lyons, N., & LaBoskey, K. V. (2002). Narrative inquiry in practice: Advancing the knowledge of teaching. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
Morris, T.H. (2018). Vocational education of young adults in England: A systemic analysis of teaching—learning transactions that facilitate self-directed learning. Journal of Vocational Education & Training.70(4), 619-643
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nolan J,& Nolan M. (1997a). Self-directed and student-centred learning in nurse education: 1. Brithish Journal of Nursing, 6(1), 51‐55.
Nolan J & Nolan M. (1997b). Self-directed and student-centred learning in nurse education: 2. Brithish Journal of Nursing, 6(2), 103‐107.
Powers, M. N. (2017). Self-regulated design leaning: A foundation and framework for teaching and leaning design. NY: Routledge.
Roberts, M. (2011). Improve student achievement through professional learning communities. Saarbrucken, Germany: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing GmbH & Co.KG.
Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. Columbus, Ohio: A Bell &Howell.
Reeve, J., R. Deci, E. L. & Jang, H. (2008). Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In D. H. Schunk& B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp.223-234). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Teurlings, C., & Van der Sanden, J. M. M. (1999). The workplace as learning environment: Learning in internships. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press
Tough, A. (1971). The Adult’s Learning Projects: A fresh aApproach to theory and practice in adult education. Accessed January 2017. http://ieti.org/tough/books/alp.htm
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3), 73-86
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. (2nd edition). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Lebeau, R. B. (2000). A commentary on self-directed learning. In D. Evesen, & C.E. Hmelo (Eds.), problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 299-313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawremce Erlbaum Associates.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top