根據國外立法例，時效取得地上權係為懲罰讓自己權利睡眠者的一種制度，以尊重現存的法律秩序，維護交易安全、增進公共利益和避免在訴訟上舉證困難。然而，台灣時效取得地上權之設計，卻限於憲法對個人財產權之保護而悖離立法意旨，導致實務上的時效取得地上權登記如緣木求魚。為了防止民主化後的新地主階層高舉個人財產權之保護旗幟而運用民法第767條，以物上請求權排除他人之占有而大炒地皮；導致，時效取得地上權制度形同虛設。由於台灣的土地總登記發生嚴重的行政瑕疵，其登記效力有待商榷？面對龍井區蚵寮莊110戶村民的陳情，執政者是否應重啟調查機制，揭開當時土地總登記之作業真相、透過政策立法等…..方式。在憲法保障個人財產權之制度下，賦予占有人時效取得地上權，以平衡所有權人和占有人雙方之財產權益，讓人民獲得一條平反的活路，以落實土地轉型正義。

According to foreign legislation, the acquisition of land rights by statute of limitations is a system for punishing those who neglect their rights in order to respect the existing legal order, maintain transactial security, enhance public interests, and avoid difficulties in providing evidence in legitimation. However, Taiwan’s design of obtaining superficies by statute of limitations is limited to the protection of personal property rights in the Constitution and goes against the legislative intent, resulting in actual Obtaining the registration of superficies is like asking for fish in a timely manner. In order to prevent the new landlord class after democratization from holding high the banner of protecting personal property rights and using Article 767 of the Civil Code to speculate on land by excluding others from occupying it with physical claims, the system for obtaining surface rights by prescription is ineffective. Due to serious administrative flaws in Taiwan's general land registration, the validity of its registration is still open to question? Faced with the petitions of 110 villagers in Hailiaozhuang, Longjing District, should the rulers restart the investigation mechanism to uncover the truth about the general land registration operation at that time, through policies and legislation, etc.? Under the system in which the constitution guarantees personal property rights, the possessor is given a statute of limitations to obtain superficies to balance the property rights of both the owner and the possessor, allowing the people to find a way to redress and implement land transformation justice.