|
1. Cuddigan, J. and R.A. Frantz, Pressure ulcer research: pressure ulcer treatment. A monograph from the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Adv Wound Care, 1998. 11(6): p. 294-300; quiz 302. 2. Garcia-Sanchez, F.J., V. Martinez-Vizcaino, and B. Rodriguez-Martin, Patients' and Caregivers' Conceptualisations of Pressure Ulcers and the Process of Decision-Making in the Context of Home Care. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019. 16(15). 3. Rodrigues, A.M., P.L. Ferreira, and C. Ferre-Grau, Providing informal home care for pressure ulcer patients: how it affects carers' quality of life and burden.J Clin Nurs, 2016. 25(19-20): p. 3026-35. 4. Arora, M., et al., Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based support versus usual care for treatment of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury in low-income and middle-income countries: study protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 2015. 5(7): p. e008369. 5. Sood, A., et al., The Role of Telemedicine in Wound Care: A Review and Analysis of a Database of 5,795 Patients from a Mobile Wound-Healing Center in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016. 138(3 Suppl): p. 248S-256S. 6. Mahoney, M.F., Telehealth, Telemedicine, and Related Technologic Platforms: Current Practice and Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2020. 47(5): p. 439-444. 7. 洪啟盛, 遠距醫療在偏鄉醫療照顧的應用. 台灣醫學, 2021. 25(5): p. 634-642. 8. Moore, Z., et al., TIME CDST: an updated tool to address the current challenges in wound care. J Wound Care, 2019. 28(3): p. 154-161. 9. Marijanović, D. and D. Filko, A Systematic Overview of Recent Methods for Non-Contact Chronic Wound Analysis. Applied Sciences, 2020. 10(21). 10. Zahia, S., et al., Pressure injury image analysis with machine learning techniques: A systematic review on previous and possible future methods. Artif Intell Med, 2020. 102: p. 101742. 11. Li, F., et al., A Composite Model of Wound Segmentation Based on Traditional Methods and Deep Neural Networks. Comput Intell Neurosci, 2018. 2018: p. 4149103. 12. Lucas, Y., et al., Wound Size Imaging: Ready for Smart Assessment and Monitoring. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2021. 10(11): p. 641-661. 13. Chang, C.W., et al., Deep learning approach based on superpixel segmentation assisted labeling for automatic pressure ulcer diagnosis. PLoS One, 2022. 17(2): p. e0264139. 14. Filko, D., D. Antonić, and D. Huljev. WITA — Application for wound analysis and management. in The 12th IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services. 2010. 15. Lu, L., et al., Deep learning and convolutional neural networks for medical image computing. Advances in computer vision and pattern recognition, 2017. 10: p. 978-3. 16. Garcia-Zapirain, B., et al., Classification of pressure ulcer tissues with 3D convolutional neural network. Med Biol Eng Comput, 2018. 56(12): p. 2245-2258. 17. Ohura, N., et al., Convolutional neural networks for wound detection: the role of artificial intelligence in wound care. J Wound Care, 2019. 28(Sup10): p. S13-s24. 18. Zahia, S., B. Garcia-Zapirain, and A. Elmaghraby, Integrating 3D Model Representation for an Accurate Non-Invasive Assessment of Pressure Injuries with Deep Learning. Sensors (Basel), 2020. 20(10). 19. Anderson, J.A. and P. Willson, Clinical decision support systems in nursing: synthesis of the science for evidence-based practice. Comput Inform Nurs, 2008. 26(3): p. 151-8. 20. Mebrahtu, T.F., et al., Effects of computerised clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review of experimental and observational studies. BMJ Open, 2021. 11(12): p. e053886. 21. Fossum, M., et al., An evaluation of the usability of a computerized decision support system for nursing homes. Appl Clin Inform, 2011. 2(4): p. 420-36. 22. Schaarup, C., L.B. Pape-Haugaard, and O.K. Hejlesen, Models Used in Clinical Decision Support Systems Supporting Healthcare Professionals Treating Chronic Wounds: Systematic Literature Review. JMIR Diabetes, 2018. 3(2): p. e11. 23. Khong, P., L. Lee, and A. Dawang, Modeling the Construct of an Expert Evidence-Adaptive Knowledge Base for a Pressure Injury Clinical Decision Support System. Informatics, 2017. 4(3). 24. Khong, P.C., et al., Nurses' Clinical Decision Making on Adopting a Wound Clinical Decision Support System. Comput Inform Nurs, 2015. 33(7): p. 295-305. 25. Tsai, H.H., et al., Teleconsultation by using the mobile camera phone for remote management of the extremity wound: a pilot study. Ann Plast Surg, 2004. 53(6): p. 584-7. 26. Chen, C.H., et al., Patient-centered wound teleconsultation for cutaneous wounds: a feasibility study. Ann Plast Surg, 2014. 72(2): p. 220-4. 27. Pak, C., et al., A smartphone-based teleconsultation system for the management of chronic pressure injuries. Wound Repair Regen, 2018. 26 Suppl 1: p. S19-S26. 28. Chang, C.W., et al., Deep Learning-Assisted Burn Wound Diagnosis: Diagnostic Model Development Study. JMIR Med Inform, 2021. 9(12): p. e22798. 29. Nguyen, D.-k., et al., A Deep Learning Model for Wound Size Measurement Using Fingernails, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics. 2022, Association for Computing Machinery: Virtual Event, Japan. p. 141–146. 30. Uijlings, J., et al., Selective Search for Object Recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2013. 104(2): p. 154-171. 31. Bochkovskiy, A., C.-Y. Wang, and H.-y. Liao, YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection. 2020. 32. Thompson, N., et al., Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2013. 26(8): p. 360-73. 33. Gorecki, C., et al., Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2013. 11: p. 95. 34. Basra, M.K., R. Sue-Ho, and A.Y. Finlay, The Family Dermatology Life Quality Index: measuring the secondary impact of skin disease. Br J Dermatol, 2007. 156(3): p. 528-38. 35. Stoyanov, S.R., et al., Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2015. 3(1): p. e27. 36. Chen, L., et al., Telemedicine in Chronic Wound Management: Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 2020. 8(6): p. e15574. 37. Anisuzzaman, D.M., et al., Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Wound Assessment: A Systematic Review. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 2021. 38. Jiang, S.W., et al., Quality and Perceived Usefulness of Patient-Submitted Storeand-Forward Teledermatology Images. JAMA Dermatol, 2022. 158(10): p. 1183-1186. 39. Grzybowski, A., K. Jin, and H. Wu, Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Dermatology. Clin Dermatol, 2024. 40. Scheibner, J., et al., Revolutionizing Medical Data Sharing Using Advanced Privacy-Enhancing Technologies: Technical, Legal, and Ethical Synthesis. J Med Internet Res, 2021. 23(2): p. e25120. 41. Huang, Y., et al., Investigation of the status and influence factors of caregiver's quality of life on caring for patients with chronic wound during COVID-19 epidemic. Int Wound J, 2021. 18(4): p. 440-447. 42. Ferreira, F., et al., A Systematic Investigation of Models for Color Image Processing in Wound Size Estimation. Computers, 2021. 10(4): p. 43.
|